Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Pennsylvania Senate Bill Would Make State 30th to Adopt Constitutional Carry by Mark Chesnut

Pennsylvania state capitol building during debate over constitutional carry legislation

A constitutional carry bill that would eliminate Pennsylvania’s concealed firearm permit requirement cleared the state Senate Judiciary Committee on May 6, advancing to the full Senate as supporters press for a floor vote.

Senate Bill 357 would allow lawful Pennsylvania gun owners to carry a concealed firearm without obtaining a License to Carry Firearms (LTCF) or paying the associated fee. The bill keeps the LTCF available as an optional license for residents who want reciprocity when traveling to states that require a permit. It does not change who is legally prohibited from possessing firearms under existing state and federal law.

The committee approved the measure on a 9-5 vote. The bill received first consideration the same day, but has not yet been scheduled for a full Senate vote.

If enacted, Pennsylvania would become the 30th state to allow permitless carry, joining a list that has grown rapidly over the past decade as more state legislatures have rolled back permit requirements following the 2022 Bruen decision.

Supporters press for floor vote

Gun Owners of America, which is lobbying for the bill, told members in a news release that the current permit system amounts to a tax on a constitutional right.

“For too long, the anti-gun elite in Harrisburg have forced law-abiding gun owners to pay a ‘permission tax’ just to exercise their right to defend themselves, and it is a clear infringement on our constitutionally protected rights,” GOA wrote. “Currently, 29 states have already embraced permit-less carry and have seen their citizens become safer and freer. It is time for Pennsylvania to join its ranks by passing SB 357 without delay.”

Pennsylvania Gun Rights distributed a member alert the same week, encouraging gun owners to contact senators and sign a petition supporting the measure.

“Law-abiding gun owners should not have to beg for government permission or pay outrageous fees to exercise their Second Amendment rights,” the alert stated. “With 29 states already recognizing Constitutional Carry as law of the land, it’s long past time for Pennsylvania to become the 30th Constitutional Carry State.”

Opposition lines up

Gun control groups, including CeaseFirePA, Giffords, and Everytown for Gun Safety, oppose permitless carry legislation, arguing that the LTCF permit process provides meaningful background screening and training requirements that reduce risk. CeaseFirePA has historically lobbied state lawmakers against similar measures, framing the permit system as a public safety baseline rather than an infringement on lawful gun ownership.

The Pennsylvania House, controlled by Democrats, is widely viewed as the steeper climb for the bill even if it clears the Senate. Governor Josh Shapiro, also a Democrat, has previously expressed support for stricter gun regulations and would be expected to veto a constitutional carry bill if it reached his desk.

What’s next

The bill awaits a full Senate vote, with no date set. If it passes the Senate, it would move to the House, where it faces longer odds. A separate pro-gun measure, Senate Bill 822, is also under consideration in the state Senate. That bill would strengthen Pennsylvania’s firearms preemption law by establishing that the General Assembly occupies the entire field of firearm regulation in the state — a measure aimed at preventing local jurisdictions from passing gun ordinances that exceed state law.

 

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Well I thought it was funny!

Some good news for a change (Babylon Bee)

Associated Press Warns That Trebuchets Are Exempt From U.S. Gun Laws

Media·May 16, 2026 · BabylonBee.com
Image for article: Associated Press Warns That Trebuchets Are Exempt From U.S. Gun Laws

U.S. — The Associated Press has warned that despite their deadly nature, medieval trebuchets are mostly exempt from firearm regulations in the United States.

The AP cautioned its audience that a full-sized counterweight trebuchet is capable of throwing 400-pound stones at a speed of one hundred miles per hour, and the government has done almost nothing to limit trebuchet access.

“The founding fathers simply did not envision a private citizen with his own trebuchet,” said AP reporter Dana Wexler. “Our laws were never written to take into account these instruments of death. There are no federal background checks, no mandatory waiting periods, and in some jurisdictions, you can even build one in your own backyard using publicly available instructions from the internet.”

In spite of the warnings, many law-abiding trebuchet owners are not going to give up their medieval siege weapons without a fight. “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a trebuchet is a good guy with a trebuchet,” said local man Bart Womack as he polished a 16-foot oak throwing arm. “If they want to come for me, bring it on. I’ve got a Honda Civic loaded up in the sling ready to fire.”

At publishing time, the Associated Press had released a follow-up article warning that finger guns are also notably exempt from current U.S. gun laws.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California

California Gun Owners Are Tired of This Double Standard

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Keane: The Trace Is Playing ‘Name-And-Shame’ Game After Assassination Attempt by Mark Chesnut

When a liberal Trump hater legally purchased a budget pistol and pump shotgun, hauled them across the country and stormed the White House Correspondence Dinner in an attempt to kill President Donald Trump and other administration officials, many gun-ban advocates reacted by blaming “lax gun laws.”

That claim holds no water, however, as California, where many purchased the guns, and Washington, D.C., where he used them in the violent attack, have some of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation.

 

The Bloomberg-funded anti-gun media mouthpiece The Trace, however, chose to place the blame in another place it didn’t belong—on the California retail chain that sold the would-be assassin his guns. Thankfully, David Keane, senior vice president and general counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), is calling out The Trace for its dishonesty in using that despicable tactic.

 

In its report, The Trace tries to make it sound like Turner’s Outdoorsman in Torrence, California, was somehow responsible for the attack simply because the violent attacker purchased his firearms there.

“Eight months before Cole Tomas Allen sprinted past a security checkpoint with his shotgun in an alleged attempt to kill President Donald J. Trump, he walked into Turner’s Outdoorsman in Torrance, California, and purchased the weapon, a Mossberg pump-action 12-gauge,” The Trace reported. “If convicted, Allen would join a long list of criminals armed with guns from the Turner’s Outdoorsman chain.

 

With over 30 outlets across California, Turner’s Outdoorsman is the biggest gun seller in the nation’s most populous state. A first-of-its-kind analysis of California Department of Justice data by The Trace shows that Turner’s is connected to more crime guns than any other California dealer or chain.”

As NSSF Keane pointed out in his report on the deceptive story by The Trace, the entire story is based on a claim that isn’t even remotely true.

“There’s no proof that the firearm retailer did anything illegal,” Keane wrote. “The firearms sold were transferred after the purchaser filled out the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Form 4473. That’s the form that requires the transferee, or purchaser, to verify that they are not a prohibited person, a fugitive from the law, dishonorably discharged from the U.S. military and that individual taking possession of the firearm is the true, intended recipient of the firearm. Individuals lying on that form risk a felony conviction, which carries a 15-year prison sentence and a $250,000 fine.”

As Keane further pointed out, the sale also must be approved by the FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). When firearm retailers ensure that these steps are completed and any accompanying state requirements are met, firearm transfers are legal. In California, that means a firearm retailer also runs a background check through the California Department of Justice (Cal DOJ), the purchaser must wait 10 days to take possession of the firearm purchased at retail, must obtain a permit to purchase a firearm and must register that firearm with law enforcement.

“What’s shady are The Trace’s assertions,” Keane wrote. “Don’t take our word for it. Take the word of the ATF, the bureau that regulates the firearm industry and puts illegal gun traffickers in prison.”

Buried deep in the article is the admission that large retailers, especially chain stores, are “unlikely to engage in risky sales, much less trafficking.” But it’s unlikely most people will get to that part of the story, even though it directly contradicts the theme of the headline and the rest of the story.

Ultimately, Keane wrote that the shoddy, misleading reporting rests directly on shoulders of The Trace and its decisively anti-gun slant.

“The shame here belongs to Bloomberg’s anti-gun mouthpiece, The Trace,” he concluded. It’s clear, though, they have no shame when it comes to ignoring the truth.”

Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Why Are Guns Banned In Australia?

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

The Prison No President Can Close

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

DOJ Sues Denver Over Semi-Automatic Ban by Mark Chesnut

The city of Denver has infringed upon the rights of its citizens for decades by banning the ownership of common, constitutionally protected semi-automatic rifles. Now, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is taking the city to task over the infringement.

Passed back in 1989, the ordinance makes it illegal to carry, store, keep, manufacture, sell, or otherwise possess what it calls “assault weapons” in the city. On May 5, the DOJ filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado seeking to have the ban ruled unconstitutional and stricken from the books.

“The Constitution is not a suggestion and the Second Amendment is not a second-class right,” Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said in a news release announcing the action. “Denver’s ban on commonly owned semi-automatic rifles directly violates the right to bear arms. This Department of Justice will vigorously defend the liberties of law-abiding citizens nationwide.”

In 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court, in its landmark decision District of Columbia v. Heller, held that the Second Amendment protects the right of law-abiding citizens to possess weapons that are in common use for lawful purposes. In the complaint, the DOJ argues that Denver’s law directly violates that critical aspect of the ruling.

“In reality, the firearms the City calls ‘assault weapons’ include ordinary semi-automatic rifles possessed by millions of law-abiding Americans,” the complaint explains. “Indeed, Americans own literally tens of millions of AR-15 style rifles, the paradigmatic ‘assault weapon’ covered by the Ordinance. As the Supreme Court has recently recognized, the AR-15 is the most popular rifle in America.

 

When the City banned AR-15 style rifles with standard capacity magazines, it banned an arm in common use for lawful purposes by law-abiding citizens. Therefore, the Ordinance violates the Second Amendment, and the United States brings this action to vindicate the rights of Denver citizens whose rights have been—and are continuing to be—violated by Defendants.”

Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon, head of the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division,  said her office stands ready to fight this ordinance and any unconstitutional gun laws throughout the nation.

“I have directed the Civil Rights Division, through our new Second Amendment Section, to defend law-abiding Americans from restrictions such as those we are challenging in these cases,” Dhillon said.

 

“Law-abiding Americans, regardless of what city or state they reside in, should not have to live under threat of criminal sanction just for exercising their Second Amendment right to possess arms which are owned by tens of millions of their fellow citizens.”

Ultimately, the DOJ is asking the court to declare the law unconstitutional under the Second Amendment, enjoin defendants and their agents from enforcing the ordinance to the extent it bans the possession of AR-15-style rifles with standard-capacity magazines, and “such other and additional relief as the interests of justice may require.”

 

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

After Nine Months in Limbo, North Carolina’s Constitutional Carry Override May Finally Get a Floor Vote by Scott Witner

Man carrying concealed handgun with the north carolina flag on his belt.

If you’ve been following the saga of North Carolina’s Senate Bill 50 — the “Freedom to Carry NC” Act — you know the drill by now. The bill passes the Senate. The bill passes the House. The Democratic governor vetoes it. The Senate overrides. And then the House does… nothing. For months. For nearly a year.

That may finally be changing.

According to comments made by Grass Roots North Carolina President Paul Valone to ABC11 on April 28, North Carolina House Speaker Destin Hall now sees “a path forward” for bringing SB50 to the House floor for an override vote. After more than a dozen instances of the bill being placed on the House calendar and quietly withdrawn since last summer, that’s the closest thing to actual movement the override fight has had since the Senate did its job back on July 29, 2025.

If — and at this point it’s still an “if” — the House finds the votes, North Carolina becomes the 30th state to recognize that exercising a constitutional right doesn’t require permission from the state.

The Quick Recap for Anyone Not Already Tired of This Story

SB50 was filed in February 2025. It would let any law-abiding North Carolinian who can legally own a firearm and is at least 18 years old carry concealed without first paying for a permit. It does not change who can legally possess a firearm. Felons, fugitives, prohibited persons, and anyone else barred under federal or state law remains barred. The existing concealed handgun permit system stays in place for anyone who wants one for reciprocity in other states or to streamline future firearm purchases.

The Senate passed it. The House passed it 59-48 on June 11, 2025. Governor Josh Stein vetoed it on June 20, trotting out the same tired script every Democratic governor uses for this kind of bill — “training requirements,” “lowered minimum age,” “endangering law enforcement” — none of which has any meaningful evidence behind it from the 29 states already operating under permitless carry. The Senate overrode the veto by a 30-19 vote on July 29.

And then the House sat on it.

Why It Has Lasted This Long

North Carolina requires a three-fifths majority of the chamber to override a gubernatorial veto. House Republicans have a comfortable majority on paper, but two Republicans — Rep. Ted Davis (New Hanover) and Rep. William Brisson (Bladen and Sampson Counties) — voted against SB50 on the original second reading. Ten others abstained.

To override, leadership needs every other Republican plus enough additional votes to clear three-fifths. Placing the bill on the calendar without locked-in commitments risks losing the override and killing the bill outright. Withdrawing it preserves the option. So leadership keeps shuffling it on and off the calendar while the whip count grinds forward — a process that’s now stretched across multiple delays since February and that has, understandably, frustrated North Carolina gun owners who were promised this bill would get across the line.

Speaker Hall’s “path forward” comment is the first time in a long time anyone in House leadership has signaled the votes might actually be there.

The Opposition Doesn’t Need a Path Forward — They Just Need One Republican

The usual suspects are organizing hard against the override. North Carolinians Against Gun Violence, Moms Demand Action, Students Demand Action, Giffords, and the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions held an event in Raleigh on April 28 specifically focused on running out the clock on the House override. Their case rests entirely on two arguments: SB50 eliminates the mandatory training requirement, and it lowers the carry age from 21 to 18.

Both arguments collapse under the slightest pressure.

On the training requirement: as Valone bluntly put it, “What other constitutionally guaranteed freedom are you required to seek mandatory training for?” You don’t need a state-issued certificate to vote, to publish, to attend a religious service, or to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. You don’t even need one to drive on private property. Mandatory training as a precondition for carry is a permission slip dressed up as a public safety measure, and it functions exactly like the literacy tests and poll taxes of an earlier era — the right itself is technically intact, but exercising it is gated behind a fee, a paperwork process, and the discretion of a bureaucrat.

On the age question: 18-year-olds can join the military and be handed an M4. They can be sent overseas and authorized to use deadly force on behalf of the U.S. government. Telling that same 18-year-old he can’t carry a concealed handgun for personal defense at home without first paying $80 and sitting through a four-hour state-approved class is — at best — an unprincipled position.

And on the public safety claim writ large: 29 states have already done this. The data from those states does not show the bloodbath gun control groups predict every single time. Same warnings. Same headlines. Same outcome. None of it materializes.

What Happens Next

If the House overrides Stein’s veto, North Carolina joins the 60% of states that have moved past the permission-slip era of concealed carry. North Carolinians who want a permit for reciprocity or for the streamlined firearm purchase process can still get one. The training and education infrastructure doesn’t disappear — anyone who wants instruction can still seek it, voluntarily, the way reasonable adults do for everything else in their lives.

If the override fails, gun owners in the Tar Heel State continue navigating a permitting system that 29 other states have already determined is constitutionally and practically unjustifiable. The fight doesn’t end — it just resets to the next session.

For now, every North Carolinian who supports SB50 should be on the phone with their state representative this week. Calls and personalized emails carry weight; form letters do not. If your representative is one of the two Republicans who voted no on second reading, or one of the ten who abstained, that contact matters even more. You can find your representative at ncleg.gov.

This is the closest constitutional carry has been to crossing the finish line in North Carolina. After nine months of procedural limbo, that’s worth getting fired up about — and worth getting on the phone about.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

BREAKING! Major Magazine Ban Ruling WIPED OUT! Supreme Court Now Set To Shape Outcome!

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Canada Is Moving Toward Door-to-Door Gun Confiscation