Categories
Some Scary thoughts

Some Red Hot Gospel there!

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Grumpy's hall of Shame Gun Fearing Wussies Paint me surprised by this Some Scary thoughts You have to be kidding, right!?!

Highland Park Lawsuit Subpoenas James Reeves, Treats Gun Reviews as ‘Advertising’by Duncan Johnson

Subpoena beside an AR-15-style rifle, notebook and microphone representing litigation reaching into firearms media.
James Reeves says the Highland Park lawsuit against Smith & Wesson has subpoenaed records concerning his firearm reviews and treats unpaid social-media content as advertising. Original illustration by AmmoLand News using OpenAI.

A lawsuit attempting to hold Smith & Wesson responsible for the crimes committed during the 2022 Highland Park parade shooting is now reaching beyond the firearm manufacturer and into the gun media.

Firearms reviewer and attorney James Reeves disclosed on X that he was served with a subpoena demanding years of records and analytics concerning Smith & Wesson and reviews he has produced.

The most troubling part for firearm journalists and content creators is how broadly Reeves says the subpoena defines advertising. According to Reeves, the plaintiffs’ definition includes “even unpaid organic social-media content.”

In other words, an independent review of a lawful firearm could be treated as corporate advertising merely because the reviewer received, tested, or discussed the product.

That is a dangerous theory with implications extending well beyond Smith & Wesson or the firearm industry.

 

Everytown Lawsuit Targets Smith & Wesson Marketing

The subpoena arises from Roberts v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., No. 22-LA-00000487, pending in the Circuit Court for Illinois’s 19th Judicial Circuit in Lake County.

The case was filed by Keely and Jason Roberts, individually and on behalf of their twin sons. The family attended the July 4, 2022, parade in Highland Park when murderer Robert Crimo III fired 83 rounds from a rooftop, killing seven people and injuring dozens more.

The Roberts family suffered horrific injuries. According to the complaint, Keely Roberts was shot through the foot, one son was struck by shrapnel, and the other suffered catastrophic injuries that left him unable to walk.

Those facts are tragic. They do not, however, make Smith & Wesson or independent firearm reviewers responsible for the deliberate actions of a murderer.

The 78-page First Amended Complaint—signed by attorneys from Everytown Law and several private firms—names Smith & Wesson, Budsgunshop.com, Red Dot Arms, Crimo, and Crimo’s father as defendants.

The lawsuit advances 11 counts, including alleged violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, deceptive trade practices, negligence, battery, assault, and emotional distress.

Its central theory against Smith & Wesson is that the company unfairly marketed the semiautomatic M&P15 to adolescent and young adult men through military imagery, appeals to excitement and adrenaline, first-person-shooter aesthetics, and social-media influencers.

The complaint repeatedly describes the M&P15 as an “assault rifle” and a “weapon of war.” It alleges that Smith & Wesson’s marketing influenced Crimo’s decision to select the rifle for his attack. That is an allegation, not a finding by the court.

Gun Media Named as Discovery Respondents

The complaint does more than attack Smith & Wesson’s advertising. It separately names Cybear Interactive, Watauga Group, and Clandestine Media Group as “respondents in discovery.” They are not listed as defendants.

The complaint contains only two paragraphs addressing these companies. It alleges that they may possess information “essential” to determining the parties or issues and asks that they answer interrogatories, produce records, and appear for depositions.

Reeves now says the plaintiffs have followed through by serving him with a subpoena seeking years of information concerning Smith & Wesson and his reviews.

AmmoLand reviewed the First Amended Complaint and Reeves’s public statement. The subpoena itself was not included with the documents reviewed, so its precise language and demands are being reported based on Reeves’s account.

According to Reeves, the requested material potentially reaches nearly any YouTube video discussing the M&P15 during the relevant period—even content produced independently and without payment from Smith & Wesson.

“If a manufacturer sends a journalist or creator a product to independently test, that does not magically transform the resulting review into advertising,” Reeves wrote.

That distinction should be obvious. A favorable firearm review does not become an advertisement merely because the manufacturer supplied a sample. Nor does a manufacturer control every conclusion, criticism, or demonstration published by an independent reviewer.

Treating journalism as advertising could allow plaintiffs to drag reporters and creators into litigation simply for covering firearms someone later misused.

Lawsuit Seeks Restrictions on Smith & Wesson Speech

The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages, but they also want the Illinois court to impose sweeping restrictions on Smith & Wesson’s marketing.

The requested injunction would prohibit Smith & Wesson from targeting AR-15-style rifle marketing at children and young adults and from using military branding, imagery, or references. It would also require age gates on social media, warnings in advertisements, and disclosure whenever an advertisement features actors.

The complaint relies heavily on the claim that Smith & Wesson created a misleading association between its M&P rifles and the United States military. It further alleges that marketing rifles with military themes encourages civilians to engage in unlawful military, militia, or paramilitary activity.

The argument effectively treats ordinary images of lawful rifle use, tactical training, or military heritage as evidence of wrongdoing. Now, based on Reeves’s description of the subpoena, plaintiffs appear prepared to apply that same theory to independent firearm coverage.

Another Attempt to Plead Around the PLCAA

Reeves characterizes the case as another attempt to circumvent the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

Congress enacted the PLCAA to prevent firearm manufacturers and sellers from being held civilly liable for harm caused by criminals who misuse lawful products. The law contains specific exceptions, including cases involving defective products, negligent entrustment, and knowing violations of laws governing firearm sales or marketing.

Gun-control organizations have increasingly attempted to fit their cases within those exceptions by framing traditional product advertising as consumer fraud or unlawful marketing.

Reeves compared the Roberts case to the litigation brought against Remington following the Sandy Hook murders. He also connected the subpoena to his work on proposed state legislation intended to clarify and reinforce protections against lawsuits based on third-party criminal misuse.

Regardless of how the Illinois court ultimately rules, the effort to classify independent reviews as advertising should concern every journalist and content creator.

The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. The First Amendment protects the right to speak, publish, and report about them. Anti-gun litigants should not be permitted to evade one constitutional protection by attacking the other.

Reeves advised firearm-media professionals who receive similar subpoenas not to ignore them—and not to delete records. That is sound advice. A subpoena is a legal demand requiring a serious and timely response.

It is also a warning that the gun-control lobby’s campaign against the firearm industry is expanding. The target is no longer limited to manufacturers and dealers. The people who review, explain, and report on lawful firearms are now being pulled into the fight.

=============================================       For the Record my Blog “You will shoot your eye out.com has gotten ONE Penny from the Public or the Gun Industry. This is just a hobby of mine and should be protected by the 1st Amendment of the US Federal Constitution.

Also it should be noted that I am dirt poor! So to all the blood thirsty lawyers out there. I kind of doubt that you would make much money off of me! Grumpy

Categories
Paint me surprised by this Some Red Hot Gospel there! Some Scary thoughts

The 5 Places In America You DON’T Want To Be When Society Begins To Collapse by John Walter

Between the moment a system begins to crack and the moment people realize something has broken beyond repair exists a window of delusion. You notice the signs but interpret them as temporary anomalies.

The supermarket shelves that sit empty for a day, two, then refill with different products, packaging you don’t recognize. The electricity bill that jumps from two hundred to four hundred dollars in one July. That news story about a California city running dry for three days, quickly replaced by a political scandal or a championship game. Collapse doesn’t scream. It whispers.

When we speak of the end of the world as we know it, we usually imagine spectacular explosions: nuclear bombs, killer pandemics, cyber attacks that extinguish the lights in an instant.

But history teaches us that civilizations more often die in whispers, through gradual erosion, through the accumulation of micro-failures that, on a certain morning, transform into catastrophic system failure.

The supply chain that has delivered your breakfast cereal every Tuesday for twenty years simply stops. The water treatment plant that has purified your tap water since 1967 shuts down because a replacement part that used to take three days to arrive is now back-ordered for eighteen months. The pension check that has arrived reliably for fifteen years bounces.

If—when—these systems begin to cascade into mutual failure, your coordinates will matter more than your preparations, more than your supplies, more than your intentions. Geography becomes destiny in ways that no amount of individual resilience can overcome.

The United States contains approximately 3.8 million square miles of territory, yet the majority of its population clusters in regions that share common vulnerabilities: dependence on distant supply chains, exposure to extreme weather events, limited local food production, and infrastructure maintained on budgets that have been deferred since the 1970s.

What follows examines five such regions where the convergence of these factors could create conditions that overwhelm individual and community capacity to adapt. The selection criteria include population density metrics, infrastructure fragility assessments, supply chain dependency ratios, and environmental risk factors.

However, the analysis also incorporates something less quantifiable: the quality of constraint. Some places trap their inhabitants through geography, others through economics, still others through the sheer inertia of accumulated human settlement that cannot be unwound quickly.

These are not prophecies. They are inventories of possibility, weighted by current data and expert projections. The scenarios described represent what could happen, what experts warn might happen, if the systems we take for granted begin to falter in earnest. The observations come from extensive travel through these regions, conversations with residents, engineers, emergency managers, and the growing number of people who sense that the ground is shifting beneath their feet.

So where does that leave us? Five places stand out—places where, if the wrong domino falls, getting out may be harder than anyone expects:

Northeastern Density: The Trap of Interdependence

 

Approximately fifty million Americans occupy the corridor stretching from Washington D.C. to Boston, packed into a settlement pattern that represents less than two percent of the nation’s landmass. Drive this route on an ordinary Tuesday and you will encounter something cartographers rarely emphasize: the absence of empty space.

One metropolitan area bleeds into the next with only the thinnest membrane of suburbia separating them. Baltimore becomes Philadelphia becomes Trenton becomes Newark becomes the Bronx, and somewhere around Stamford you realize that you have not seen uninterrupted horizon for hours.

This density creates a particular vulnerability that rural preppers rarely grasp. When the systems that feed this organism hiccup, the hiccup becomes strangulation. Consider the Port of New York and New Jersey, which processes roughly thirty-two percent of the East Coast’s container traffic.

In 2026, this facility operates on infrastructure that engineers have assessed as “functionally obsolete” at rates exceeding forty percent in some corridors. The phrase sounds technical, almost reassuring. What it means is that the roads, bridges, and rails were built for a different era—lighter trucks, less traffic, more forgiving maintenance schedules—and have been kept in service through patches and emergency repairs that accumulate technical debt.

A transportation planner I interviewed in New Haven explained the mathematics that keep her awake. The just-in-time delivery networks that keep supermarket shelves stocked now operate with margins so thin that a three-day delay triggers cascading shortages. “We used to have warehouses full of backup,” she noted, gesturing toward the stacked containers visible from her office window. “Now we have algorithms. Algorithms don’t eat, but they also don’t care if you do.”

One scenario that emergency management officials have modeled involves a moderate hurricane—Category 2 or 3—making landfall near Sandy Hook and tracking northward. Such storms have occurred historically and will occur again. The difference now lies in the margin of error.

Previous decades maintained redundancy that could absorb localized damage. Today, according to a 2025 report from the American Society of Civil Engineers, the Northeast’s infrastructure operates with minimal redundancy and maximal interdependence.

Damage to particular bridges, specific switching yards, certain pumping stations could propagate failure across networks that residents assume are separate but are in fact intimately connected.

The electrical grid presents similar fragility. The Northeast operates as an integrated system managed by regional transmission organizations. In theory, this allows power to flow from surplus areas to deficit areas.

In practice, according to power systems researchers, the grid has become increasingly brittle. The addition of renewable sources has introduced variability that aging infrastructure struggles to balance.

Transformers that step voltage up for transmission and down for distribution have average ages exceeding forty years. Replacement parts for some models are no longer manufactured and must be scavenged from decommissioned facilities or fabricated to order, extending outage durations from days to weeks.

If such an outage occurred during winter—and climate scientists suggest that extreme cold events may become more frequent as Arctic warming disrupts the jet stream—the consequences could exceed emergency response capacity.

During the 2024 cold snap affecting Buffalo and Rochester, approximately two hundred thousand residents lost power. Most were restored within seventy-two hours. But edge cases revealed systemic fragility: elderly residents in high-rise buildings unable to descend stairs to reach warming centers, individuals dependent on electrically powered medical equipment, apartment complexes where frozen pipes burst and rendered buildings uninhabitable even after power returned.

Multiply these edge cases across fifty million residents, and you begin to see why experts warn that sustained outage could trigger population movements overwhelming remaining infrastructure.

The highways serving as evacuation routes—primarily I-95 and tributaries—operate at capacity during normal traffic. During the 2021 evacuation ahead of Hurricane Ida, portions of I-95 experienced stationary traffic for fourteen hours. If such conditions persisted for days, with vehicles running out of fuel and occupants unable to reach shelter, humanitarian implications become severe.

Water infrastructure presents equally concerning vulnerabilities. New York City’s aqueduct system includes the Delaware Aqueduct, completed in 1944, which has been leaking approximately thirty-five million gallons daily since at least the 1990s.

Engineers have proposed a bypass tunnel, but construction has faced delays due to geological challenges and funding constraints.

If the original tunnel were to fail before bypass completion—a scenario that the city’s Department of Environmental Protection acknowledges as possible—the city would have approximately sixty to seventy-two hours of stored water before distribution would need rationing or suspension.

The social dimensions prove harder to model but equally important. The Northeast Corridor contains extreme wealth alongside concentrated poverty. Manhattan’s Upper East Side and the Bronx’s South Bronx exist within the same administrative boundaries but experience radically different service levels.

If municipal capacity degraded, social control would likely degrade unevenly, with private security and wealth concentration providing insulation for some while others faced increasing precarity. Historical precedents from other urban crises suggest that social order can deteriorate rapidly when expectations of response are violated.

Gun laws throughout this region vary but tend toward restriction. Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, and Maryland maintain licensing requirements, magazine capacity limits, and assault weapon bans that would complicate armed self-defense for residents who had not navigated these requirements in advance.

If law enforcement capacity degraded alongside other systems, residents would face security dilemmas with constrained options.

For those considering relocation from this region, geography itself presents challenges. The Appalachian Mountains form a barrier to the west that funnels movement into limited corridors. The coastal plain to the east offers no escape from sea-level rise and storm surge. The corridor’s residents are committed to infrastructure that supports them, dependent on its continued functioning in ways that preclude easy exit.

California’s Agricultural Mirage: When the Water Stops

 

The view from the airplane window reveals the contradiction immediately. Descending into Los Angeles, you see brown mountains giving way to dense urbanization stretching to the horizon, a carpet of development that seems to deny the aridity beneath it.

Then you notice the emerald golf courses, the shimmering swimming pools, the imported vegetation requiring constant irrigation to maintain the illusion of garden climate. This civilization was built on the premise that water can be made to flow uphill, toward money, indefinitely.

Three weeks in the Central Valley during spring 2026 revealed the reality behind the mirage. Towns that coastal Californians never visit—Mendota, Firebaugh, Dos Palos—sit surrounded by some of the most productive agricultural land in the world.

Or rather, they used to. Unemployment rates in these towns exceed thirty percent, not because residents lack work ethic, but because the work has evaporated. Water allotments that made the region’s agriculture possible have been cut, then cut again, as the Colorado River entered its third decade of drought and Sierra Nevada snowpack declined to fractions of historical averages.

A third-generation farmer in Mendota showed photographs on his phone of his family’s former orchards. The almond trees had been removed in 2024, shredded and buried because no water existed to support them and no market for the wood.

The land now lies fallow, blowing dust that coats windows and lungs alike. “We used to feed the country,” he said, though the phrase seemed as much ritual as statement of fact. Now the region imports food from Mexico and Central America, the irony apparently lost on policymakers who spent decades restricting the immigration that made the agricultural economy possible.

The Central Valley produces approximately one-third of the nation’s vegetables and two-thirds of its fruits and nuts. This output has been made possible by the largest water engineering project in human history—dams, aqueducts, and pumps that move water from the wet north to the dry south, from the Colorado River eastward across desert, from underground aquifers being pumped faster than natural recharge can replace.

Aquifer depletion has caused land subsidence—the ground literally sinking—as voids left by extracted water collapse. In some areas, land has dropped more than two feet in a single year. This subsidence damages the very infrastructure—canals, roads, pipelines—that makes water movement possible, creating feedback loops of degradation.

If water deliveries were significantly disrupted—and multiple scenarios could produce such disruption, from earthquake damage to aqueducts to political conflict over Colorado River allocations to electrical grid failures disabling pumps—the agricultural economy would collapse within a single growing season.

The implications extend far beyond the Central Valley. The nation’s food system has become concentrated to a degree unrecognizable to previous generations. Four companies control approximately eighty percent of beef processing. Three companies dominate grain exports. The lettuce appearing in Maine in January comes from this valley, transported by logistics assuming continuous fuel availability and functioning refrigeration.

Los Angeles and San Diego present different but related vulnerabilities. These cities exist in permanent water deficit, maintained only by imports traveling hundreds of miles. The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has warned that if imports from the Colorado River and Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta were simultaneously reduced—a scenario climate models suggest becomes more likely as warming progresses—the region would face shortages that local supplies and conservation cannot address.

Desalination plants have been proposed and partially constructed, but these facilities require enormous energy inputs and cannot scale quickly enough to replace lost imports.

The wildfire situation has evolved beyond catastrophic into chronic. The 2025 fire season burned approximately 4.5 million acres in California alone, and smoke from these events created air quality hazards extending across state lines.

Insurance companies have begun withdrawing from high-risk areas, making homeownership impossible without state-backed coverage that may itself prove unsustainable.

If a fire season coincided with water shortages and grid instability—if, for example, a major transmission line were disabled by fire, cutting power to pumping stations that could not be restored because of ongoing fire danger—the confluence could overwhelm emergency response capacity.

The San Andreas fault system presents seismic risks extensively studied and inadequately addressed. The USGS estimates approximately seventy percent probability of a magnitude 6.7 or greater earthquake in the San Francisco Bay Area before 2045, with similar probabilities for Southern California.

Such an event would damage not merely buildings but the infrastructure making urban life possible. Aqueducts crossing the fault zone would likely rupture. Ports handling forty percent of the nation’s imports would face liquefaction damage. Buildings constructed before modern seismic codes—numbering in the hundreds of thousands—would experience failure rates rendering hundreds of thousands homeless simultaneously.

Social fabric has been strained by housing costs that have driven the middle class inland or out of state entirely. Coastal cities have become increasingly bifurcated, with technology wealth concentrated in specific neighborhoods and poverty spreading in others.

The homeless population in Los Angeles County exceeded seventy-five thousand in the 2025 count, many living in encampments that have become semi-permanent settlements. If municipal services degraded, these populations would face immediate survival crises, and geographic constraints of the coastal plain would limit options for dispersal.

Gun laws in California are among the most restrictive in the nation, with assault weapon bans, magazine capacity limits, and waiting periods complicating armed self-defense for residents who had not navigated these requirements in advance. If law enforcement were overwhelmed by crisis conditions, residents would face security challenges with constrained options.

For those considering exit from this region, geography presents the barrier of the Sierra Nevada to the east and the Mojave Desert to the southeast. Routes out—Interstate 5 northward, Interstate 15 eastward—would likely become congested quickly in any mass movement scenario. The assumption that one can simply drive to safety may not hold when millions attempt the same journey simultaneously.

Florida’s Sinking Peninsula: The Physics of Water and Salt

 

The real estate listing described the property as “waterfront” without specifying that water now laps at the foundation during high tides. This particular house in Miami Beach’s Sunset Harbour neighborhood had begun flooding on sunny days with increasing regularity.

The asking price was $2.3 million, down from $3.1 million two years prior, though the seller’s agent preferred emphasizing “opportunity” rather than trend. The garage had been converted to living space after flooding made parking impossible, and the ground floor sat empty, tiled and waterproofed against the inevitable.

Florida’s vulnerability begins with geology. The peninsula sits atop porous limestone, karst topography resembling Swiss cheese more than solid rock.

This porosity means sea level rise does not simply advance across land like a wave; it percolates upward through bedrock, contaminating freshwater aquifers from below.

The Biscayne Aquifer, providing drinking water to approximately six million South Florida residents, has experienced saltwater intrusion as far as fifteen miles inland in some areas. The boundary between fresh and salt water moves inland at rates varying with rainfall and pumping, but the trend is unambiguous.

A hydrogeologist at the University of Miami explained that standard responses to saltwater intrusion—building desalination plants—face insurmountable energy constraints. Reverse osmosis requires approximately ten megawatt-hours per million gallons produced. At scale, this would require power generation capacity that does not exist and cannot be built quickly enough to address accelerating intrusion.

“We are not facing a technological problem,” she noted. “We are facing a thermodynamic problem. The energy required to maintain this population in this location exceeds available supply.”

Hurricane risk is well understood but inadequately prepared for. The 2024 season demonstrated that even moderate storms can produce cascading failures when intersecting with aging infrastructure. Hurricane Helene, a Category 4 storm, caused approximately $85 billion in damage and left portions of the state without power for weeks.

The 2026 hurricane season, according to NOAA’s forecast, is expected to be “extremely active,” with eight to ten major hurricanes predicted. Warm water temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic—reaching ninety degrees Fahrenheit in some measurements—provide fuel for storms that could exceed historical intensity records.

If a major hurricane made direct landfall on Miami or Tampa, storm surge could reach heights overwhelming existing seawalls and surge barriers. Evacuation routes—primarily Interstate 75 north and Interstate 95 north—would face immediate congestion.

Unlike other regions, Florida’s peninsula geography offers no lateral escape. Residents cannot drive west to avoid a storm approaching from the east; the peninsula is only a few hundred miles wide at its broadest point. The Keys are connected by a single highway that becomes impassable with moderate surge, trapping residents who did not evacuate early.

The insurance market has already begun retreating from Florida. Most major carriers have stopped writing new policies in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach counties.

State-backed Citizens Property Insurance has become the insurer of last resort for hundreds of thousands of properties, creating risk concentration that could bankrupt the state if a major storm season occurs. If the insurance market collapsed entirely, property values would plummet, destroying wealth residents have accumulated and potentially triggering financial crisis extending beyond the state.

Heat and humidity create dangers often underestimated by those who have not experienced them without air conditioning.

Wet-bulb temperature—a measure combining heat and humidity to indicate the body’s ability to cool through sweating—has approached dangerous thresholds in South Florida during recent summers. If the electrical grid failed during a heat wave, elderly and vulnerable populations would face immediate health risks.

The 1995 Chicago heat wave killed approximately seven hundred people; Florida’s larger vulnerable population and higher baseline temperatures suggest that a similar event could produce casualties in the thousands.

Social dynamics include a large elderly population that retired to the state for climate and tax advantages. This population is particularly vulnerable to service disruptions, dependent on electricity for medical equipment, air conditioning, and mobility.

Gun laws are relatively permissive compared to the Northeast, but concentration of population in coastal areas would complicate any attempt at self-sufficiency through hunting or fishing, as game populations would be quickly exhausted by millions attempting to subsist.

For those considering exit from Florida, geography presents barriers of the Gulf of Mexico to the west and Atlantic to the east. Evacuation must occur northward, through Georgia and Alabama, which would face their own challenges absorbing millions of refugees. The assumption that one can wait for FEMA to arrive may not hold when disaster affects the entire peninsula simultaneously.

The Desert Southwest: Phoenix and the Thermodynamic Ceiling

 

The swimming pool had evaporated to a greenish puddle at the deep end, surrounded by cracked concrete suggesting abandonment rather than disuse.

This particular house in a Phoenix suburb had seen foreclosure rates spike in 2025 and continue climbing through 2026. The “For Sale” sign had bleached in the sun, the phone number faded to illegibility. The realtor had stopped returning calls months ago. The house represented a bet on permanent abundance that had been lost.

Phoenix exists in violation of thermodynamic common sense. The metropolitan area has grown from approximately 100,000 residents in 1950 to nearly five million today, all living in a valley receiving less than eight inches of rainfall annually and experiencing summer temperatures reaching 120 degrees Fahrenheit.

This existence has been made possible by the Central Arizona Project, a 336-mile canal system pumping Colorado River water uphill across desert, and by air conditioning systems consuming electricity generated primarily by plants requiring water for cooling.

Lake Mead, the reservoir storing water for the Lower Colorado River Basin, reached “dead pool” status in May 2026. This term does not mean the lake is empty; it means the water level has dropped below intake valves feeding the Las Vegas Valley and Central Arizona Project.

The Southern Nevada Water Authority has been extending “straws” deeper into the reservoir, but they are now approaching bedrock. When water can no longer be pumped—and this could occur within years if current trends continue—cities of the desert Southwest will face a reckoning that no technology can postpone.

A week in Phoenix in July 2026 revealed the reality behind the air conditioning. Staying in a motel where cooling functioned only intermittently, when it failed the room temperature rose to 95 degrees within an hour.

Outside, pavement radiated heat making walking impossible after 9 AM. The heat was not merely uncomfortable; it was hostile, an active force pressing against skin, making breathing laborious, transforming every task into an ordeal of endurance. And this was with a functioning grid. When power fails in Phoenix—and it does, with increasing frequency as demand outstrips capacity—the city becomes lethal within hours.

Important below:

You might be living in one of America’s deathzones and not have a clue about it

What if that were you? What would YOU do?

In the next few minutes, I’m going to show you the U.S. Nuclear Target map, where you’ll find out if you’re living in one of America’s Deathzones.

The human body cannot survive temperatures above approximately 95 degrees Fahrenheit for extended periods without cooling mechanisms.

In dry heat, evaporation provides cooling as long as water is available to replace sweat. Phoenix combines dry heat with extreme intensity, creating conditions where shade provides only partial relief. The elderly, the very young, and those with cardiovascular conditions face immediate risk. Hospitals fill with heatstroke victims. Morgues require additional refrigeration capacity.

Water situation compounds thermal danger. Phoenix has approximately three days of water in local reservoirs if Colorado River imports cease.

Groundwater has been pumped so aggressively that land is subsiding, cracking infrastructure carrying water and power. When taps run dry, there is no alternative source. The desert offers no streams to drink from, no springs to tap. Water that exists is deep underground, requiring energy to pump that will not exist when the grid fails.

Evacuation routes from Phoenix lead through desert that kills the unprepared. I-10 east toward Tucson, I-17 north toward Flagstaff, US-60 toward Globe—all pass through terrain where a broken-down vehicle becomes a death sentence in summer. When collapse comes, and fuel deliveries stop, and vehicles break down, roads out of Phoenix will become dotted with the stranded and the dead. The desert does not forgive miscalculation.

Social fabric has been strained by housing boom and bust cycles, by influx of retirees seeking affordable living, by concentration of poverty in areas with least tree cover and highest heat exposure. Gun laws are relatively permissive, but the environment itself provides the most severe constraints. One cannot hunt what does not exist; desert game populations are sparse and would be quickly exhausted by residents attempting to subsist.

For those considering exit from this region, timing presents the crucial variable. Leaving in October, when temperatures moderate, is feasible. Leaving in July, when heat makes outdoor exposure lethal within hours, may be impossible. The desert creates a window of opportunity that closes with the rising sun.

The Industrial Midwest: When the Pensions Run Dry

 

Snow fell on streets where streetlights had not worked for months, transforming the urban landscape into something resembling a nineteenth-century lithograph rather than a twenty-first-century city.

Walking through this South Side Chicago neighborhood in February 2026 revealed vacant lots stretching for blocks, former residential areas now returned to prairie, buildings demolished for code violations and never replaced. Remaining structures were fortresses, barred and boarded, occupants huddled against cold seeping through walls no matter how high thermostats were set.

Chicago’s crisis is financial before environmental, though environment compounds difficulties. The state of Illinois owes approximately $140 billion to retired public workers and has roughly $25 billion in assets to cover these obligations.

The city of Chicago owes another $47 billion. In 2026, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled that pension benefits cannot be reduced constitutionally, effectively guaranteeing municipal bankruptcy within two years. When Chicago declares bankruptcy—and most municipal finance experts agree this is inevitable—it will become the largest municipal failure in American history.

Implications extend beyond abstract realms of bond ratings and credit defaults. Police and fire departments will face cuts rendering them unable to respond to routine emergencies, let alone systemic shocks.

Snow removal keeping streets passable in winter will become unreliable. Water infrastructure, already ancient and leaking, will face deferred maintenance accelerating failure. Schools, already struggling, will close or operate on reduced schedules. Social services maintaining safety nets for vulnerable populations will fray.

A firefighter with twenty-three years of service described equipment shortages already beginning: engines that cannot be repaired because parts are no longer manufactured, protective gear exceeding rated lifespan, training curtailed for budgetary reasons.

“We are one bad fire away from catastrophe,” he said, immediately qualifying: “Actually, the disaster is already here. People just don’t see it yet.”

Winter weather of the Midwest presents dangers coastal residents often underestimate. The polar vortex collapse of February 2026 brought temperatures of minus thirty-two degrees Fahrenheit to Chicago, with wind chills of minus sixty-five.

The electrical grid failed for eighteen hours in some areas. Two hundred forty-seven people froze to death in their homes, most elderly, many discovered only when neighbors noticed mail accumulating. This event was not an anomaly. Climate models suggest Arctic warming may destabilize the jet stream, causing more frequent intrusions of polar air into mid-latitude regions.

If such cold events coincided with infrastructure failures—if natural gas pipelines supplying heating fuel failed, or the electrical grid collapsed under demand—death tolls could reach thousands.

Emergency warming centers have capacity for thousands, not tens of thousands. Hotels that might serve as backup require functioning infrastructure and payment mechanisms. Social networks allowing neighbors to shelter each other have been attenuated by decades of population loss and neighborhood abandonment.

Detroit presents an even starker vision of municipal failure. The city has lost approximately sixty percent of its population since 1970, leaving a sprawling urban area with infrastructure sized for nearly two million residents serving fewer than seven hundred thousand.

The water department has shut off service to entire neighborhoods where maintenance costs exceeded revenue from ratepayers. Streetlights do not function in many areas. Police response time in some districts exceeds an hour.

When collapse accelerates, Detroit will not have a riot problem; it will have a “feral city” problem, where entire districts operate under autonomous control and remaining infrastructure is stripped for scrap by organized crews.

The Great Lakes, which seem like advantages, have become liabilities. PFAS “forever chemicals” have rendered most fish inedible, and algae blooms in Lake Erie now cover approximately forty percent of the lake’s surface annually.

The “fresh water” advantage is illusory when filtration technology requires energy and replacement parts that will not exist after supply chains break. Water is present but poisoned, accessible but undrinkable without treatment infrastructure that may not survive systemic shock.

Gun laws in Illinois are restrictive compared to national averages, with licensing requirements and waiting periods complicating armed self-defense for residents who had not navigated these requirements in advance.

Social dynamics include deep segregation, concentrated poverty, and history of industrial abandonment leaving many residents with skills mismatched to available economy.

For those considering exit from this region, geography presents the barrier of winter. Leaving in January requires functioning vehicles, clear roads, and destinations with heating capacity.

The assumption that one can simply drive south ignores the reality that millions may attempt the same journey simultaneously, overwhelming infrastructure of receiving regions.

The Geography of Survival

The five regions examined share characteristics making them particularly vulnerable to systemic collapse: high population density, infrastructure dependency, environmental stress, and limited exit options. They are not the only vulnerable regions in the United States, but they represent concentrations of risk exceeding national averages by significant margins.

For those finding themselves in these regions, questions become ones of timing and preparation. Relocation is optimal strategy, but it requires resources, flexibility, and willingness to abandon social networks and economic opportunities that may have taken decades to build.

For those who cannot relocate, preparation takes form of redundancy: water storage, food reserves, alternative heating or cooling, communication plans, and community networks providing mutual aid when formal systems fail.

But beyond the practicalities of preparation lies a deeper recognition that we have built our civilization on assumptions of permanence that geology and physics do not guarantee.

The Northeast Corridor assumes that water can be moved hundreds of miles indefinitely. California assumes that desert can be made to bloom through engineering will. Florida assumes that the ocean can be held back by pumps and walls. Phoenix assumes that heat can be air-conditioned into submission. The Industrial Midwest assumes that pension promises can be kept through financial alchemy.

These assumptions have persisted because, for decades, they have worked well enough. The water has flowed, the crops have grown, the cities have functioned, the checks have cleared.

But systems operating at the edge of their capacity have no margin for disruption. They are, in the terminology of engineers, “brittle”—strong under normal conditions but prone to catastrophic failure when stressed beyond design parameters.

What the next decade may bring is unclear. Perhaps the infrastructure investments that have been promised for generations will finally materialize.

Perhaps the climate models are too pessimistic, and the jet stream will stabilize, and the rains will return, and the aquifers will recharge. Perhaps the financial wizards will discover some mechanism for making the mathematics of pension obligations work. Perhaps.

But perhaps not. And if the systems do begin to cascade into mutual failure—if the water stops flowing, and the power goes dark, and the trucks no longer arrive, and the temperature does things that human bodies cannot survive—then your location will determine whether you are among those who adapt or among those who become statistics in a catastrophe that future historians will struggle to explain.

The choice, for now, remains yours. The window, according to those who watch these systems most carefully, may be narrower than we wish to believe. The ground is shifting. The question is whether we will feel it in time to move our feet.

The Mathematical Warning That Refused to Fade

When the shelves empty and the streets change, stockpiles may not be enough!!!

(What you’re about to see reveals just how quickly the world we know can unravel.)

Affiliate Disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you make a purchase through these links, I may earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. Thank you for your support!

Follow for more market & economic analysis:

📌 Pinterest — Charts, market insights & economic analysis.

📰 Flipboard — Follow my curated market & macro coverage.

Categories
All About Guns Ammo Some Scary thoughts You have to be kidding, right!?!

How to Kill a Robot Dog By Will Dabbs, MD

We live in the most amazing times. Someday soon when we are all living in caves wearing animal skins picking parasites off of each other, our children will ask why we no longer have cool stuff like the internet, running water, electricity, and food. When that time inevitably comes, you can at least tell your kids that you saw it coming.

The Terminator was Actually a Documentary

The people who work on artificial intelligence cannot cogently articulate exactly how AI works. The days of some computer geek settling in behind a keyboard to bang out code are gone never to return. Nowadays, computer programmers get their computers to write their computer code. It seems inevitable that those computers will eventually wise up and decide to cut out the middle man.

Unless you want to end up paying taxes to your microwave, it behooves us all to do a little sensible preparation. Chief among those post-apocalyptic chores is figuring out how to kill a robot dog. It’s not intuitive.

Know Your Enemy

Just in case you’ve been living underneath a bridge someplace, Google “scary robot dog” and get ready to have your world rocked. If you have an operational credit card, $9,420 will get you a flame-throwing robot dog over the Internet from ThrowFlame.com. The Unitree Go2 robot dog is only two grand. Uncle Sam has militarized versions sporting advanced sensors, thermal imagers, and machine guns. It just seems inevitable that we will someday go to war with these things.

For starters, the militarized versions are quite often armored. However, like tanks, extra armor means extra weight which means decreased agility. Such stuff is the perennial tactical tradeoff. With the right ammo, your typical defensive rifle should be up to the task, presuming you know where to shoot.

U.S. Air Force Tech. Sgt. Johnny Rodriguez, 321st Contingency Response Squadron force protection craftsman and lead defender for the CR team, walks with the robot dog during an agile combat employment exercise Sept. 3, 2020, at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. The robot dog is an experimental technology with the intent of aiding defenders in securing an airfield and is part of the Advance Battle Management System, which is being tested during the ACE exercise.

Feeding the Beast

GI green-tip M855 5.56mm ammunition incorporates a small tungsten penetrator into the bullet to offer better performance through light cover. It’s not armor-piercing per se, but it will still penetrate 3mm of mild steel at 600 meters. It’s even better up close. Think car doors and the like. That is likely adequate to deal with your typical robot dog.

I keep two PMags loaded with M855 next to my primary defensive rifle at the house. It doesn’t sport a label that says, “For use against armored robot dogs” or anything. However, yeah, it’s for use against armored robot dogs.

Mechanical Anatomy

It is tempting to concentrate on the head of the robot dog. However, robot dogs are anthropomorphically different from real dogs or carbon-based animals of any sort, for that matter. The head is just sensors. That’s not where the beast thinks.

It’s not unreasonable to shoot for its legs. In tank parlance, this would be called a mobility kill. The thing might remain prickly, and it may yet still be relaying vital tactical information back to your doorbell camera or your dishwasher or whatever else is coordinating everything. However, shoot one of its legs off, and at least it won’t be chasing after you with quite so much enthusiasm.

The Vitals

Heat is the mortal enemy of computers everywhere. As a result, the CPU for a robot dog is most commonly carried inside the main upper electronics bay underneath the top shell. They often include mechanical heat sinks or cooling fans. The CPU will be protected by the main chassis cover and may be armored. It makes for a small target, but putting a round through the mother board is going to reliably take that robot dog out of the fight.

The other sweet spot is the battery. Most robot dogs use lithium-ion, lithium polymer, or lithium iron phosphate rechargeable batteries. Older toy-grade mechanical hounds might incorporate nickel-metal hydride batteries, but these are not the machines that are going to be trying to get all up into your business.

The Achilles Heel

The common thread to robot dog batteries is lithium. Lithium is a soft, slivery-white alkali metal. It is, in fact, the lightest of all metallic elements. However, like all alkali metals, lithium is both highly reactive and flammable. As a result, pure lithium, like its legendarily malevolent cousin sodium, must be stored in a vacuum, an inert atmosphere, or within a liquid like purified kerosene. Expose that stuff to water or even wet air, and it is going to get all conflagrated.

Pass a bullet through the battery, and your robot dog will most likely incinerate itself right sharpish. You will find the battery on most robot dogs in a secure slot in the bottom or rear part of the torso. The battery assembly is fairly heavy, so it is usually stored low in the chassis to improve stability.

Ruminations

So, there you have it. When you inevitably have to defend your home and family from a weaponized AI-driven robot dog, don’t waste your time shooting it in the head. That will likely just make it angry. Concentrate your fire on the center of mass either toward the top focusing on the CPU or at the bottom to rupture the battery. Or just blow its legs off. Connect with any of that stuff, and humanity gets to live another day.

All this seems silly right up until it’s not. Knowing how to efficiently kill a robot dog may someday be something we teach little kids in school, presuming our evil mechanical overlords still allow us to have schools. It’s a brave new world, and luck always favors the prepared.

Categories
Some Red Hot Gospel there! Some Scary thoughts

The boy crisis nobody talks about

Categories
Some Scary thoughts

The 6 American Regions That Will Become Ungovernable Within 30 Days of Collapse

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft Paint me surprised by this Some Scary thoughts that’s too bad”

Ouch & cringing at the same time !

Categories
Born again Cynic! Cops EVIL MF Grumpy's hall of Shame If I was in Charge Paint me surprised by this Some Scary thoughts You have to be kidding, right!?!

‘What about Tate?’ Dave Adamiak, Tate’s father, is nearing his wit’s end. by Lee Williams

by Lee Williams

Dave Adamiak, whose son Patrick “Tate” Adamiak has 17 more years left to serve in federal prison, is confused, perplexed and nearing his wit’s end.

While he appreciates all the support his son’s case has drawn—there are hundreds of videos and stories chronicled on his “Freedom for Tate” website—Tate remains is prison.

To date, there has been no formal move to secure his release—despite the kind words of more than a few elected officials.

Adamiak’s family sent a pardon request to Attorney General Todd Blanche and U.S. Justice Department Pardon Attorney Edward J. Martin Jr., along with nearly 2,000 signatures of supporters, who all believe Tate should never have been charged with a crime.

Tate’s name remains on President Donald Trump’s pardon list, unlike hundreds of others. In addition to 301 pardon denials, the Pardon Attorney has said that 5,908 clemency applications were also rejected.

His 20-year prison sentence, too, has received scorn, even from ATF Director Robert Cekada.

Cekada believes Adamiak was mistreated and massively over-sentenced.

“On the facts of this case, the sentence Mr. Adamiak received is excessive. Mr. Adamiak had no prior criminal history. He dealt with these weapons as curios. We have no evidence that he intended to use the weapons unlawfully or that he was part of a criminal organization. The extremely high sentencing guidelines likely reflect the paradigmatic cases of individuals possessing destructive devices, such as grenade launchers, and normally involve terrorism or organized criminal activity. No such conduct was present here. For me, unlawful possession of National Firearms Act items sentences approximately in the three-to-five-year range are common,” he told me just over a month ago.

Cekada is not alone. Six Republican lawmakers sent their own letter to Blanche and Martin seeking Adamiak’s release.

Congresswoman Jen Kiggans along with Congressmen Eli Crane, Eric Burlison, Paul A. Gosar, D.D.S., Rob Bresnahan, Jr., and Daniel Webster were very clear as to their intent:

“We, the undersigned Members of Congress, respectfully request that you work with President Donald Trump to give fair consideration to a commutation request for Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak. We believe that certain inconsistencies in the regulatory framework applied in his case as well as the broader enforcement environment at the time warrant careful review and consideration for executive clemency,” the lawmakers wrote.

The Representatives were extremely clear about Adamiak’s innocence, stating he had “maintained a well‑documented interest in military history and the lawful collection of historic artifacts, replicas, and training devices.”

“The items of concern in his case were inert collector pieces, nonfunctional replicas, and training aids that were incapable of firing,” the letter states.

Patrick “Tate” Adamiak as he was processed into the Western Tidewater Regional Jail on June 16, 2026. (Photo courtesy Western Tidewater Regional Jail).

For reasons that neither he nor his family understand, Adamiak remains housed in the Western Tidewater Regional Jail in Suffolk, Virginia—a county jail and a dangerous hellhole with none of the amenities of a federal prison.

On the day he first arrived at Tidewater, two guards pepper-sprayed an inmate for little or no reason, rammed his head into a metal door, and then dragged him through the jail until his neck and hand were broken. The jail’s medical staff said the inmate was “unlikely to regain limb control.”

The two guards were later fired and charged with malicious wounding; a Class 3 felony in Virginia involving intentional injury with the intent to maim, disfigure, disable, or kill. They each face up to 20 years in prison and $100,000 in fines.

Attempts to contact Adamiak in this facility were unsuccessful.

Case history

Adamiak, who at the time was an active-duty Navy E-6, was arrested and charged by the ATF during the height of the Biden Administration’s war on guns, gun owners, gun rights and the Second Amendment.

Adamiak had been accepted to attend BUD/S (Basic Underwater Demolition/SEAL training). Had the ATF left him alone, he would likely be leading a Navy SEAL platoon.

After ATF agents kicked down his doors, they found nothing illegal or even suspected of being illegal. As a result, the ATF brought in a specialist, ATF Firearm Enforcement Officer Jeffrey R. Bodell, who discombobulated the actual items that the agents had found—all of which are still sold legally online, most do not even require an ID—and turned them into machineguns and destructive devices.

Adamiak was charged with illegally possessing a machinegun for a toy STEN submachinegun found during the search warrant. He paid $75 for the non-firing Spanish replica—or toy—which was made by Denix and is still sold online. Bodell inserted a real STEN barrel and receiver, neither Bodell nor his assistant could make it fire more than one round at a time. Despite their hard work, the toy STEN would not even accept a real magazine. Still, Bodell officially ruled that the toy was a machinegun.

Adamiak was charged with illegally possessing two destructive devices, two inert RPGs that had holes drilled into their receivers and were stripped of internal parts. ATF’s “expert” added parts from real RPGs until they would fire a single subcaliber 7.62x39mm round. As a result, he classified the RPGs as destructive devices. The inert RPGs are still legally sold today without an FFL or any other paperwork.

Takeaways

Adamiak and his father are very concerned about an upcoming hearing, which is scheduled for next month before Arenda L. Wright Allen, the federal judge who oversaw his trial and sentenced Adamiak to serve 20 years in prison.

They both doubt Judge Allen will give Tate a fair hearing. She has already precluded his attorney from rehashing much of anything from the trial. Adamiak could actually receive even more time behind bars.

Every day seems to be a constant battle, Dave Adamiak said. While Tate receives verbal support, nothing official is ever done.

Dozens of politicians have said Adamiak should never have been charged, yet he remains in prison.

“What about Tate?” Dave Adamiak asked. “It appears he’s been swept under the rug after all the traffic about his case. Everyone seems to know about it, but nothing is ever done. He’s still in prison—for nothing illegal. He broke no law. He did nothing wrong.”

Categories
Some Scary thoughts War You have to be kidding, right!?!

WW3 Simulation: What Would Really Happen If World War 3 Started

Categories
Some Scary thoughts

From The Bayou Renaissance Man (A Great Blog by the way!)

The Saudi nuclear program: what else did anyone expect?

I’m cynically amused by the brouhaha over the US deal with Saudi Arabia to help that country develop a peaceful – underline, peaceful – nuclear energy program, including (it seems) enriching nuclear fuel.

Consider the facts of the current situation, in no particular order.

 

  • Saudi Arabia bankrolled much of Pakistan’s nuclear program, including its nuclear warheads and missiles.  It’s long been rumored among “those in the know” that Pakistan has guaranteed Saudi Arabia that it can have nuclear warheads at twenty-four hours’ notice, in an emergency.
  • Saudi Arabia has bought Chinese ballistic missiles that can carry nuclear warheads.  By strange coincidence, they’re the same type of ballistic missiles that Pakistan has in its nuclear silos.  Odd, that . . .
  • Iran has launched missile attacks on Saudi Arabian territory from the north, using cruise and ballistic missiles.  Its Houthi allies have done the same from Yemen in the south.
  • That would be enough to make any nation a little paranoid.  What if the Iranian Revolutionary Islamic Guard, or whatever it calls itself these days, were to figure out how to put nuclear payloads on those missiles – either a full-blown nuke warhead, or a “dirty nuke” using conventional explosives to spread radioactive material around, say, Riyadh or a major military base?
  • Israel has for decades maintained that it will neither confirm nor deny that it has nuclear weapons.  Anyone with two working brain cells to rub together is quite confident that they have more than a few, almost certainly including major thermonuclear weapons.  See my comments in these pages from time to time concerning the so-called “Vela incident”.
  • Given those various and sundry realities and threats, it was obvious that Saudi Arabia was going to go ahead and greatly expand its nuclear program(s).  It didn’t really have any choice but to do so, if it was to survive in an environment like that.
That being the case, why is anybody surprised that President Trump would try to get involved with Saudi Arabia’s plans and help them along?  Saudi was going to do it anyway.  We could have sat there and criticized, or expressed concern, or whatever – which would have bounced off Saudi’s national interests like water off a duck’s back.
This was a case of making the best of two very difficult and unpalatable choices, and I think the President acted wisely.  I’m sure he, and the US establishment, would rather not have made that choice, but as I said earlier, this was going to happen whether or not we were involved.

 

As for the fat-headed reports that the President was/is at odds with his Energy Secretary over what was done, and how it was done . . . yeah, right.

As if any Secretary in the President’s cabinet is going to land a surprise like that on his boss’s desk, without so much as a “by your leave”!  Sure, there may have been friction in the give-and-take between the White House and the Energy Department, but what else is new?  The very fact that the Energy Secretary still has his job is sufficient evidence that any such friction was relatively minor.

I’m also enjoying outraged suggestions from the left that the President is trying to stretch the agreement in new ways by pressuring Saudi Arabia to accept the Abraham Accords in exchange for US nuclear help.

There’s nothing new in this:  President Trump has been trying to persuade Saudi Arabia to sign on to the Accords ever since he took office.  It might be a very useful talking point to mention that if Israel finds Saudi Arabia diplomatically cooperative, some of the former’s nuclear warheads may no longer needed to be targeted at the Arabian peninsula.  In Saudi’s position, I’d find that a very thought-provoking consideration . . .

Overall, I think America joining Saudi’s nuclear program as a partner nation has far more positives than negatives.  It will also make Iran rethink its nuclear ambitions, given that the existing Saudi-Pakistan nuclear relationship might put them between two actinic fires, so to speak.

What’s next in the Middle East?  Your guess is as good as mine . . . but it’s likely to be “interesting”, in the sense of the fabled ancient Chinese curse!

Peter