Category: Grumpy’s hall of Shame
Now normally I avoid talking about Politics in this blog of mine. As I figure that we all need a break from that BS.
Plus I really DON”T want to alienate any of my wonderful readers out there. But w.t.f. did California do to get this “man” as its Leader?
So in closing, all I can say is that I am just so happy to be out of that Nut House! That and may God protect my readers out there in my birthplace! Grumpy

by Lee Williams
Patrick “Tate” Adamiak was arrested more than four years ago even though he never committed any crime. More than 40 officers led by ATF Agents kicked down his doors and ripped apart his home.
They found nothing illegal—not a thing—yet he’s starting the fourth year of his 20-year federal prison sentence.
Bottom line: He is completely innocent.
For those of you who have asked, here’s Tate’s address:
Patrick Tate Adamiak
#95252-509
Federal Correctional Institution Fort Dix
PO Box 2000
Joint Base MDL NJ, 08640
So far, we’ve written 44 stories about Tate, his family and what they are facing.
Here they are:
What Pennsylvania lawmakers are not doing for Patrick Tate Adamiak, May 19, 2026
Tate Adamiak’s letter to the new ATF director, May 13, 2026
Tate Adamiak’s upcoming ‘Diesel Therapy’ cancelled—he won, May 10, 2026
UPDATED: Tate Adamiak to receive 50 days of ‘Diesel Therapy’ punishment, May 06, 2026
SAF files amicus brief urging Supreme Court to review Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s case, May 04, 2026
How you can help free Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak, April 20, 2026
How Tate Adamiak’s 20-year sentence compares to 10 other ATF cases, Apr 14, 2026
It’s been four long years since ATF arrested Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak, Apr 08, 2026
An interview with The AK Guy, GOP candidate for U.S. House, Brandon Herrera, Apr 01, 2026
How President Trump’s ATF can help Tate Adamiak, Mar 12, 2026
Adamiak remains behind bars, guiltless but ignored by the Trump Administration, Feb 17, 2026
Behind bars: A day in the life of Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak, Dec 11, 2025
Expert firearm witness criticizes ATF’s treatment of Patrick “Tate” Adamiak, Nov 18, 2025
Even the ATF now admits inert RPGs—including Adamiak’s—are not firearms, Nov 11, 2025
How Adamiak received 20 years in prison for semi-auto Uzis and other legal guns, gun parts, Nov 04, 2025
Adamiak’s attorney strikes back at his criminal charges, Nov 01, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s criminal case now depends on his appellate attorney, Oct 21, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s appeal was quick, inconclusive, Sep 12, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s appeal relies solely on the truth, Sep 09, 2025
While gun owners strongly support Adamiak, politicians don’t, Sep 04, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s appeal will be heard in 10 days, Sep 02, 2025
Hey, ATF! Nothing you found in Tate Adamiak’s home is illegal, Aug 19, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s asks President Trump for a pardon, July 30, 2025
Adamiak: ATF’s machinegun charges are complete fiction, July 8, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak: ‘Thanks for the help, New Jersey!’ July 1, 2025
Former ATF official: ‘Adamiak should not be in prison’ Jun 26, 2025
ATF prepping the same untruths, toy guns for Adamiak’s appeal, Jun 24, 2025
Judge unknowingly admits Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s inert RPGs were legal Jun 10, 2025
How Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak received a 20-year prison sentence May 20, 2025
How ATF falsely charged former sailor with possessing destructive devices May 13, 2025
Former sailor should be pardoned, ATF agents should be charged Apr 29, 2025
Meet the man whose lies put an innocent sailor in prison for 20 years Apr 25, 2025
How ATF used inert RPGs to imprison American sailor for two decades Apr 22, 2025
ATF wanted former sailor to serve an additional 10 years in prison for 100% legal MAC flats Apr 15, 2025
Q&A: Former sailor discusses his 20-year prison sentence, the ATF and his hope for the future Apr 08, 2025
Federal prosecutors now using ATF’s lies and fake evidence to harm former sailor’s legal appeal Apr 01, 2025
Trump should pardon innocent sailor jailed by Biden administration for 20 years Mar 18, 2025
One of the worst things ATF has ever done Feb 24, 2025
Sailor serving 20-years in prison for legal semi-auto collectibles Feb 18, 2025
How a replica STEN gun led to a sailor’s 20-year prison sentence Feb 14, 2025
Free Patrick Tate Adamiak Jan 31, 2025
ATF lied to convict sailor now serving 20 years in prison for selling legal gun parts — A SPECIAL REPORT Jan 29, 2025

If you needed yet another reason not to move to California, a new proposal in the state legislature should make the growing list.
According to a report at CalMatters, Senate Bill 948 would require gun owners moving to California to complete a four-hour course with live-fire training in order to receive the state-required Firearm Safety Certificate — and to register their firearms within 180 days of their arrival. The measure would also require existing state residents to complete the training and obtain the certificate before purchasing any firearm in the future.
Current law requires only a written exam for the Firearm Safety Certificate.
The measure, introduced in a state that already has among the most restrictive gun laws in the nation, was approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee on a party-line vote, with no Republicans supporting it. The only silver lining: the training requirement was cut in half from the eight hours originally proposed earlier in the session.
State Sen. Jesse Arreguin, who authored the measure, said the bill is critical for the safety of California citizens.
“Firearm safety is essential in preventing firearm-related incidents, especially those involving children,” Arreguin said during a legislative hearing. “By strengthening training requirements and closing gaps in current law, SB 948 will ensure responsible gun ownership to keep Californians and the community safe.”
What Arreguin didn’t present was any evidence that firearms accidents among new state residents have actually been a problem. That’s because no such evidence exists. The proposal is yet another solution looking for a problem.
Opponents called the bill what it is. Adam Wilson, speaking for Gun Owners of California and Gun Owners of America, called it “a misguided piece of legislation that masquerades as gun safety, but in reality wreaks an insurmountable barrier to exercising a constitutional right.”
“This bill will transform California’s existing FSC into a de facto licensing scheme,” Wilson said at the hearing.
Wilson also noted that SB 948 would saddle license applicants with an estimated $400 cost, disproportionately harming women, people of color, and lower-income residents — many of whom live in higher-crime neighborhoods where the right to self-defense matters most.
“SB 948 is a modern-day poll tax on the Second Amendment, and at its core, SB 948 raises serious constitutional issues,” he said.
Having cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee, the measure now heads to a vote on the Senate floor.

by Lee Williams
United States Congressman Rob Bresnahan is a young newly elected Republican serving Pennsylvania’s Eighth Congressional District, which is located in the northeast portion of the state and includes Patrick Tate Adamiak’s home where his father lives.
Bresnahan is the CEO of a construction company with 150 employees. According to his bio, the Congressman lives with his wife Chelsea and a cat named Blue.
Last week, Congressman Bresnahan’s staffers refused to allow him to be interviewed about Patrick Tate Adamiak, the weeks of “Diesel Therapy” he was recently saved from, or the 50-plus stories we’ve written about his wrongful prosecution, conviction and imprisonment.
Just minutes after killing the interview, Bresnahan’s staffers immediately called Adamiak’s father and questioned him once again about his son’s plight. The Congressman’s staffers have been talking to him for months but have done nothing substantive.
“We have been trying to get them on board for a long time. I first spoke to one staffer who blew me off. Basically, they said they don’t want to get involved with legal cases,” Dave Adamiak said Monday. “I was shocked and a little aggravated being a constituent that they can’t help in any way. A few weeks later, I was in touch with a different staffer. He was a little more responsive and said he’d get back to us. He never did. When you posted the tweet that’s when I got another call. He claimed it had nothing to do with the tweet.”
Late Monday afternoon, Congressman Bresnahan’s communications director, Hannah Pope, called and said, “We are looking into this issue.”
She still would not allow her boss to be interviewed, saying “We’re still looking into this. Try checking back in a few weeks.”
Congressman Bresnahan did not respond to interview requests.
Here’s the tweet Dave Adamiak referred to:

As of Monday, when the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari to Adamiak’s case, the role any federal or state lawmaker can take to help the 38-year-old former active-duty sailor became even more important.
Pennsylvania State Senator Lisa Baker is running for re-election to represent District 20. Another Republican, her current term ends in November.
Baker, who served as deputy chief of staff for two former Republican governors, did not respond to calls or emails seeking her comments about Adamiak’s plight, but her opponent did.

Tyler Meyers describes himself as Christian, a conservative Republican and a U.S. Army veteran, who was born and raised in northeastern Pennsylvania.
Both he and his daughter appreciate guns and are strongly opposed to what happened to Adamiak.
“Tate was arrested for selling gun parts, but the ATF couldn’t actually pin any type of crime on him, so they manufactured charges against him, got him convicted and then sentenced to 20 years in prison,” Meyers said Monday. “Even though the current ATF Director seems opposed to it, it’s ridiculous Tate’s still in prison. There are groups trying to get him out, but they were told he’d be home by Christmas. My opponent, Lisa Baker, is supposedly a ‘Second Amendment champion,’ but she’s been silent on this issue. I heard the story about Tate a long time ago. It’s insane this has been allowed to get this far.”
The Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project wouldn’t be possible without you. Click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support pro-gun stories like this.
Australia Is a Defenseless Victim Zone
The government likes it that way. Coroner reveals new details after 20-year-old intruder shot dead in Melbourne home invasion
A man is at home with his heavily, pregnant partner. Three men, armed with axes break in. They assault the pregnant woman. At least one of the three has a firearm. The homeowner wrestles the firearm away from the bad guy, and in the course of the fight said bad guy is shot in the chest, and dies of his wounds.
The cops arrest the homeowner, because you are not allowed to defend yourself in Australia. The law actually says that you are allowed, but you must use proportional response, and somehow, shooting a bad guy, with his own gun, after he and his buddies have attacked your pregnant girlfriend, is not proportional enough for the powers that be, Down Under.
And the pregnant woman was struck in the leg with an ax.
The homeowner was initially charged with murder in relation to the incident “however the prosecution did not progress due to the opinion of prosecutors that there were no reasonable prospects of a conviction,” according to Spanos’ findings.
Justice? Why would they worry about Justice?
Since law and order seem to be deteriorating in Australia, some of the states are trying to return some measure of self-defense. I don’t expect it to come to much. (They’re too “civilized” for that kind of thing.)
There is a push, however, to introduce laws to increase the rights of homeowners. The push is, in part, due to an increase in the number of home invasions in Victoria, driven in large part by young, recidivist offenders.
The demand for an overhaul of self-defence laws in Victoria is being led by Libertarian MP David Limbrick.
The law abiding are more than disarmed. They are forbidden, in any practical sense, from defending themselves.

In a move that has triggered debate among gun rights advocates and lawmakers, West Virginia Senate Bill 1071, commonly referred to as the “Machine Gun Bill,” will not proceed in the current legislative session. Senate President Randy Smith (R-Preston) announced his decision to block the bill, citing what he calls significant legal and drafting issues rather than any opposition to Second Amendment rights.
The bill, introduced late in the session, aimed to expand access to fully automatic machine guns for eligible West Virginia residents.
Specifically, it advocated creating the Office of Public Defense within the West Virginia State Police, which would oversee the purchase, sale, and distribution of machine guns to individuals for state defense purposes. Supporters contend the bill aligns with Second Amendment protections, bolsters personal and community security, while complying with federal background check requirements.
SB 1071 initially cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday, March 2, following a contentious meeting that ended in confusion.
Committee Chairman Tom Willis called for a recess, and after discussions, the bill appeared to advance with strong support.
However, it never reached the full Senate floor or the Finance Committee, stalling ahead of the crossover day deadline on Wednesday, March 4, the point by which bills must pass their originating chamber to remain viable.
Smith explained his rationale in statements released today, describing the legislation as “poorly drafted” and submitted on the final day for Senate bills.
He consulted with multiple attorneys, members of West Virginia’s National Rifle Association, and the West Virginia Citizens Defense League (WVCDL), all of whom reportedly advised that the bill would likely fail in the House of Delegates and invite court challenges. “This bill, as it was submitted to us, would be unable to pass the House of Delegates and would face numerous judicial challenges to its implementation upon passage,” Smith stated.
Speaking to multiple senators, WVCDL lobbyist Art Thomm implied that the NRA does not support the bill.
Ammoland News spoke to NRA-ILA President John Commerford, who denied that the NRA had anything to do with killing the bill.
In fact, Commerford stated that the NRA is looking forward to working with the sponsor of the bill to improve it for next year.
Mr. Commerford also confirmed to AmmoLand News that Thomm does not work for the NRA and hasn’t worked for the gun rights organizations for a few years.
The NRA has a new West Virginia State Director starting Monday. The lawmakers AmmoLand News spoke to said they believed the NRA was opposed to the bill’s passage.
Critics of the decision, including bill sponsor Sen. Chris Rose (R-Monongalia) and Sen. Laura Chapman (R-Ohio), voiced frustration over the lack of transparency.
Rose noted that reviving the bill would require suspending constitutional rules and obtaining a two-thirds majority, a hurdle he deemed unlikely at this stage. “Traditionally speaking, this bill would be dead at this time,” Rose said. Chapman reiterated these sentiments, calling the process opaque: “The bill is dead, and it was killed without transparency and without consensus, despite the fact that this bill had overwhelming support by this body.”
Gun Owners of America (GOA) has mobilized supporters to pressure Smith for a floor vote.
In an urgent call to action, GOA claimed the bill “mysteriously disappeared” despite passing committee and urged constituents to contact the Senate President, pointing out that 93% of West Virginia gun owners reportedly support such measures. “We have an extremely small window to get this done,” GOA stated.
The bill’s failure emphasizes continuing tensions in West Virginia’s Republican-dominated legislature over gun rights legislation.
While the state has some of the most permissive gun laws in the nation, including permitless carry, efforts to challenge federal restrictions on machine guns, which have been tightly regulated since the 1934 National Firearms Act (NFA) and further restricted by the 1986 Hughes Amendment, commonly experience scrutiny for possible conflicts with national law.
During committee discussions, concerns were raised that the bill may unintentionally expose residents or state police to federal violations, with West Virginia Troopers Association President Lonnie Faircloth voicing concerns about transferring machine guns to private citizens.
Opposition within the committee was limited but notable. Sen. Ryan Weld (R-Brooke) voted against the bill, and Sen. Joey Garcia (D-Marion) questioned its adherence to federal regulations. Despite this, the measure had obtained considerable backing from gun rights groups and some lawmakers who viewed it as a stand against supposed federal overreach.
As the legislative session winds down, the fate of SB 1071 acts as a reminder of the procedural and statutory hurdles even popular ideas can face. Smith reasserted his commitment to Second Amendment issues, suggesting that a better-drafted version could be considered in future sessions.
For now, however, West Virginians seeking machine guns have to navigate the existing National Firearms Act licensing process, which remains stringent and costly.
