Smith & Wesson Model 25-5 .45 Colt
A S&W 29-2 in caliber 44 Magnum
6.5 Grendel vs 5.56 By CTD Blogger

If you own an AR-15, you are well acquainted with the 5.56 NATO. Along with its civilian sibling, the .223 Remington, this round makes up a massive portion of the ammo market for the AR platform.
Because of the AR’s popularity, manufacturers have created numerous rounds for this rifle. AR cartridges include, among many others, the 6.5 Grendel. The 6.5 may not carry the same level of fame, but it has an active, loyal fanbase.
Why?
Because it delivers excellent downrange capability and extended hunting potential from the popular AR platform.
Should you make the switch from 5.56 to 6.5? Should the Grendel be your next hunting round? Let’s take a close look to find out…
5.56mm NATO or 6.5 Grendel: Quick Comparison
Now that we understand the performance capabilities, we can identify the advantages of each cartridge…
Advantages of the 6.5 Grendel:
- Stronger energies, especially downrange.
- A slightly wider bullet creates larger wound channels.
Advantages of the 5.56 NATO
- Faster speed, especially within 200 yards.
- A large market of affordable ammunition makes it better for high-volume target shooting.
6.5 Grendel vs 5.56: Side by Side
6.5 Grendel |
5.56 NATO |
|
Bullet Diameter |
0.264 inches |
0.224 inches |
Neck Diameter |
0.293 inches |
0.253 inches |
Base Diameter |
0.439 inches |
0.377 inches |
Case Length |
1.52 inches |
1.76 inches |
Overall Length |
2.26 inches |
2.26 inches |
Case Capacity |
0.151 cubic inches |
0.13 cubic inches |
Bullet Weights |
90 – 130 grains |
55 – 77 |
Typical Firearm |
AR-15 semiautomatic rifles |
AR-15 semiautomatic rifles |
How are They the Same?
The obvious similarity (and the reason we are comparing these rounds) is that they are both loaded into the AR-15 rifle. This firearm, which has been called “America’s rifle,” has many advantages, including nearly unlimited customizability and practical versatility. 5.56 ammo (and we’ll include .223) is the standard load for the AR-15, while the 6.5 Grendel attempts to give AR shooters enhanced ballistic capabilities.
Physically they are different, but there is one notable similarity: the length. Both fit into the AR chamber at 2.26 inches in length, although other measurements, such as bullet diameter and case width, make them easily distinguishable.
Physical Specs
The physical differences are obvious. The 6.5 Grendel’s bullet is wider, although it’s not a major difference. The most notable difference is the bullet weights. With a wider projectile, the 6.5 Grendel packs bullets weighing as much as 130 grains, and they can be even higher with specialty-load ammunition. The 5.56 NATO mostly tops out around 77 grains, while the majority of rounds are a standard 55-grain.
There is also a difference in case length (the 5.56’s is longer) and case width (the Grendel’s is wider). This creates a difference in total capacity, with the Grendel having a bit more room for propellant.
What’s Cheaper to Shoot?
You might assume that the 5.56 NATO would have a massive advantage in ammo availability. This is sort of, but not completely true. 6.5 Grendel ammo, essentially, is just as readily available as the 5.56 NATO, if you are strict about not including .223 in the calculation. Since a 5.56 chamber can also load the .223 Remington. (.223 Remington rifles, it should be noted, should not load the higher-pressured 5.56.) This gives 5.56 users access to the vast assortment of .223 ammunition, which is one of the most widely sold cartridges on the planet.
With the availability of bulk and military surplus ammo, the 5.56 is often a cheaper option, although many 6.5 Grendel rounds have comparable prices.
6.5 Grendel vs 5.56 Ballistics
To compare these two rounds, we took a simple approach. We selected five products from each cartridge, tallied the manufacturer stats, and calculated the average. This approach, while imperfect, provides a decent method for comparing the two rounds.
Velocity Comparison
6.5 Grendel |
Muzzle (fps) |
100 Yards |
200 Yards |
300 Yards |
400 Yards |
500 Yards |
90-grain Varmageddon (Nosler) |
2,800 |
2,549 |
2,311 |
2,086 |
1,874 |
1,677 |
100-grain ELD-VT V-Match (Hornady) |
2,730 |
2,531 |
2,340 |
2,158 |
1,984 |
1,819 |
115-grain TAC-TX BT (Barnes) |
2,590 |
2,367 |
2,155 |
1,954 |
1,765 |
1,590 |
120-grain Fusion MSR (Federal) |
2,600 |
2,346 |
2,107 |
1,881 |
1,674 |
1,485 |
130-grain Premier Match (Remington) |
2,400 |
2,251 |
2,108 |
1,969 |
1,836 |
1,711 |
AVERAGE |
2,624 |
2,409 |
2,204 |
2,010 |
1,827 |
1,656 |
|
||||||
5.56 NATO |
Muzzle (fps) |
100 Yards |
200 Yards |
300 Yards |
400 Yards |
500 Yards |
55-grain Target & Practice (Winchester) |
3,180 |
2,786 |
2,425 |
2,092 |
1,787 |
1,516 |
62-grain FMJ Frontier (Hornady) |
3,060 |
2,714 |
2,394 |
2,095 |
1,820 |
1,571 |
68-grain BTHP Match Frontier (Hornady) |
2,960 |
2,697 |
2,449 |
2,215 |
1,993 |
1,786 |
70-grain TSX-BT (Barnes) |
2,850 |
2,568 |
2,303 |
2,054 |
1,822 |
1,609 |
75-grain BTHP Match (Hornady) |
2,910 |
2,675 |
2,452 |
2,240 |
2,039 |
1,848 |
AVERAGE |
2,992 |
2,688 |
2,405 |
2,139 |
1,892 |
1,666 |
The 6.5 Grendel was created to increase the performance capabilities of the AR-15. As we’ll see, it achieved this goal in many respects. But in velocity, at least close range, it appears to fall short. From the muzzle averages, it’s about 250 feet per second slower than the 5.56 NATO. There is plenty of overlap, but the light 55-grain 5.56 rounds deliver speeds over 3,100 fps, which makes it blazing fast compared to most AR rounds.
Downrange, however, the 6.5 Grendel is catching up. At 500 yards, the difference in averages narrows to a mere 10 fps, which is, for all practical purposes, insignificant. Downrange the stats are similar, but the 5.56 wins this comparison thanks to better muzzle and short-range speeds.
Energy
6.5 Grendel |
Muzzle (t-lbs) |
100 Yards |
200 Yards |
300 Yards |
400 Yards |
500 Yards |
90-grain Varmageddon (Nosler) |
1,567 |
1,298 |
1,067 |
869 |
702 |
562 |
100-grain ELD-VT V-Match (Hornady) |
1,655 |
1,422 |
1,216 |
1,034 |
874 |
735 |
115-grain TAC-TX BT (Barnes) |
1,713 |
1,431 |
1,186 |
975 |
796 |
646 |
120-grain Fusion MSR (Federal) |
1,801 |
1,467 |
1,183 |
943 |
747 |
588 |
130-grain Premier Match (Remington) |
1,663 |
1,463 |
1,282 |
1,119 |
973 |
845 |
AVERAGE |
1,680 |
1,416 |
1,187 |
988 |
818 |
672 |
|
||||||
5.56 NATO |
Muzzle (ft-lbs) |
100 Yards |
200 Yards |
300 Yards |
400 Yards |
500 Yards |
55-grain Target & Practice (Winchester) |
1,235 |
948 |
718 |
534 |
390 |
281 |
62-grain FMJ Frontier (Hornady) |
1,289 |
1,014 |
789 |
604 |
456 |
340 |
68-grain BTHP Match Frontier (Hornady) |
1,323 |
1,098 |
906 |
741 |
600 |
482 |
70-grain TSX-BT (Barnes) |
1,263 |
1,026 |
825 |
656 |
516 |
402 |
75-grain BTHP Match (Hornady) |
1,410 |
1,192 |
1,001 |
836 |
692 |
569 |
AVERAGE |
1,304 |
1,056 |
848 |
674 |
531 |
415 |
We now see the purpose of the 6.5 playing out in the stats. It’s more powerful from start to finish, and demonstrates a superior level of energy that makes it more capable for long-range hunting.
With a wider bullet and energies hovering around 1,000 ft-lbs at 300 yards, it clearly makes a better option for moderate game like deer and hog. Four out of five of the Grendel rounds were above 900 ft-lbs at 300 yards; at this distance, the 5.56 maxed out at 741 ft-lbs. Thumping long-range power was never the goal of the 5.56, so this is little surprise.
Trajectory
6.5 Grendel |
200 Yards |
300 Yards |
400 Yards |
500 Yards |
90-grain Varmageddon (Nosler) |
0 |
-8.5 |
-25 |
-51.4 |
100-grain ELD-VT V-Match (Hornady) |
0 |
-8.3 |
-24.2 |
-48.9 |
115-grain TAC-TX BT (Barnes) |
0 |
-9.9 |
-28.9 |
-59.1 |
120-grain Fusion MSR (Federal) |
0 |
-10.1 |
-30.5 |
-63.1 |
130-grain Premier Match (Remington) |
0 |
-10.4 |
-29.7 |
-59.8 |
AVERAGE |
0 |
-9.4 |
-27.7 |
-55.5 |
|
||||
5.56 NATO |
200 Yards |
300 Yards |
400 Yards |
500 Yards |
55-grain Target & Practice (Winchester) |
0 |
-9 |
-26.7 |
-55.3 |
62-grain FMJ Frontier (Hornady) |
0 |
-7.7 |
-23.4 |
-49.7 |
68-grain BTHP Match Frontier (Hornady) |
0 |
-7.5 |
-22 |
-45.4 |
70-grain TSX-BT (Barnes) |
0 |
-8 |
-24.2 |
-51 |
75-grain BTHP Match (Hornady) |
0 |
-7 |
-21 |
-43.4 |
AVERAGE |
0 |
-7.8 |
-23.5 |
-49 |
The Grendel has reliable downrange power, but if you are looking for the straightest trajectory, if you simply want to hit the target and don’t care how hard it hits, the 5.56 NATO appears to excel.
The differences are not massive, but we see less drop from the classic 5.56. Overall the 6.5 Grendel shows more drop while the 5.56 NATO displays straighter trajectories.

If you shoot an AR-15, visit our site to find the affordable rounds you deserve. We have a full selection of top-quality rounds from the top brands in the country, all supported by our superior service!
Springfield Armory just expanded its SAINT Victor lineup with the launch of the new SAINT Victor 8.5” 9mm Pistol. This AR-pattern pistol packs 9mm power into a compact package designed for reliability and solid performance.
The pistol features forged 7075 T6 aluminum upper and lower receivers, both dedicated to 9mm. It runs a direct blowback system, so shooters can expect rugged simplicity without gas system complexities.
The 8.5-inch Melonite-treated barrel aims to squeeze out strong ballistic performance from the 9mm chambering while staying maneuverable.
At the muzzle sits Springfield’s SA Muzzle Drum, tucked neatly under the free-floating handguard. The handguard itself comes with M-Lok slots for accessories and an included M-Lok handstop. There’s also a QD mount at the receiver end plate for sling options.
Feeding the pistol is a 32-round Colt-pattern magazine. Other notable features include an adjustable SB Tactical SBA3 pistol brace, B5 Systems polymer trigger guard, B5 Systems Type 23 P-Grip, and a 45-degree, short-throw ambidextrous safety.
Steve Kramer, Springfield Armory’s VP of Marketing, called it an “appealing new addition” that combines compact dimensions with solid 9mm performance, whether for defense or fun range days.
The SAINT Victor 8.5” 9mm Pistol hits the market at an MSRP of $1,099.
is a seasoned outdoorsman, lifelong hunter, and the kind of guy who’d rather track whitetails than scroll social media. As an editor for GunsAmerica, he’s got a sharp eye for spotting both solid gear and bad gun laws.
Whether he’s deep in the woods or deep in editorial deadlines, Larry brings a no-nonsense, tell-it-like-it-is approach to firearms, hunting, and the great American tradition of self-reliance. If there’s a hot debate on gun rights or the latest in hunting tech, you can bet Larry’s got an opinion—and it’s probably backed up with both facts and field experience.
In the Belly of the Beast
I’m surprised, but pleased:
Second Amendment Advocates Score Victory In New Jersey
An initiative spearheaded by the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) and the New Jersey Firearms Owners Syndicate (NJFOS), with the robust backing of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA), has seen Englishtown, New Jersey, pass a resolution to refund the municipal portion of permit to carry fees to applicants.
This success marks the beginning of a concerted effort by the three organizations to replicate the refund resolution across the entire Garden State.
At the heart of this movement are New Jersey’s current permit-to-carry fees, which stand at $200. A significant $150 of this fee goes directly to the local municipality.
Critics argue that a negligible amount of these funds actually covers the administrative costs of issuing permits, strongly suggesting the fee is “strictly punitive in nature” and designed to discourage citizens from exercising their Second Amendment rights.
This is in New Jersey!