Categories
Being a Stranger in a very Strange Land Blessed with some of the worst luck Born again Cynic!

Shocking news – except to Africans, Africa wins again! From Bayou Renaissance Man

A South African hotelier is believed to have been eaten by a 15ft crocodile after human remains were found inside the swollen reptile.

 

The animal was shot from a helicopter and airlifted from the crocodile-infested Komati River in a daring police operation before a post-mortem examination was carried out.

A ring was found inside the belly of the 500kg apex predator and is thought to have belonged to Gabriel Batista, 59.

 

The businessman was swept away in floodwaters while trying to drive across the Komati River in the north-east of the country a week ago.

Investigators will carry out DNA tests on the bones and flesh found inside the crocodile.

 

. . .

 As well as the body parts, six different types of shoes were found, according to Capt Potgieter.

 

There’s more at the link, including images.

The comments from friends and acquaintances in the USA have been amusing.  A surprising number are absolutely horrified that a man who’d just escaped drowning had promptly been eaten by a wild animal.  It’s almost as if it was unfair, somehow.

They weren’t comforted by my assurance that in large parts of Africa, that sort of thing happens on an almost daily basis.  As for the “six different types of shoes” . . . yeah, I’d say Mr. Batista was far from the only human meal that croc had enjoyed.  Local tribespeople were doubtless greatly relieved by the news that it had been caught.

Rural Africa remains a very dark continent, filled with very deadly animals.  Actual examples:

  • A man visits a neighboring village, gets drunk, and decides to walk back to his village along a deserted path at night.  Halfway there, a passing leopard finds him and decides that he’ll make a satisfactory supper.
  • A man goes looking for a lost cow along a river bank.  A hippo, grazing on long grass a short distance away, decides that she doesn’t want him (or anyone else) getting between her and the water, which is her security blanket.  She bites him in half.
  • A hunter gets too close to an elephant, which promptly tramples him into pink slush in the mud.  He isn’t able to shoot her in time to save himself, and in the stress of the moment, only wounds her.
  • While she’s recovering from the bullet wound, she kills several local villagers who get too close to her, on the general principle that if a man did this to her, she’s going to presume that any man she sees is going to try to do likewise.
  • An armored personnel carrier is driving through thick brush and trees.  The vehicle commander is standing with his head and shoulders outside the turret, trying to see through the thick growth to plot his course. boomslang (tree snake) is jarred off its branch by the APC as it brushes against the tree.  It falls onto the vehicle commander, bites him (injecting a full dose of poison, which proves fatal) and then falls through the turret hatch into the interior of the vehicle, biting two other soldiers before it’s killed by a rain of rifle butts.
  • The two survive, but only because it had already injected much of its venom into the vehicle commander.  They’re sick for several weeks.
All those incidents were personally known to me.  I was nearby when they all happened.  That’s the norm in wild rural Africa.
The cities can be a lot tamer, but not always.  A few decades ago, I remember two leopards who set up house in the concrete basement and utility spaces of the biggest soccer stadium in Soweto, surrounded by hundreds of thousands of people.
They lived off local cats and dogs.  When their presence was deduced (due to the rapid decline in other local pets and wildlife, and the presence of their tracks after rain) the local police were asked to hunt them down and shoot them.
Freely translated and interpreted, the local cops’ reply was along the lines of, “You want us to go into a concrete labyrinth, with no light at all, to hunt two big cats that can see in the dark?  Oh, hell, no!  Here, take our rifles and show us how it’s done.  We’ll watch.  In fact, we’ll sell tickets on pay-per-view!”

 

I’m very sorry for Mr. Batista, and for his family, of course . . . but that’s Africa:  and in Africa, the good guys don’t always win.  It goes with the territory.

Categories
All About Guns Born again Cynic! California Grumpy's hall of Shame Gun Fearing Wussies Paint me surprised by this Some Sick Puppies! You have to be kidding, right!?!

California Bill Would Require 4-Hour Course and Firearm Registration for New Residents by Mark Chesnut

If you needed yet another reason not to move to California, a new proposal in the state legislature should make the growing list.

According to a report at CalMattersSenate Bill 948 would require gun owners moving to California to complete a four-hour course with live-fire training in order to receive the state-required Firearm Safety Certificate — and to register their firearms within 180 days of their arrival. The measure would also require existing state residents to complete the training and obtain the certificate before purchasing any firearm in the future.

Current law requires only a written exam for the Firearm Safety Certificate.

The measure, introduced in a state that already has among the most restrictive gun laws in the nation, was approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee on a party-line vote, with no Republicans supporting it. The only silver lining: the training requirement was cut in half from the eight hours originally proposed earlier in the session.

State Sen. Jesse Arreguin, who authored the measure, said the bill is critical for the safety of California citizens.

“Firearm safety is essential in preventing firearm-related incidents, especially those involving children,” Arreguin said during a legislative hearing. “By strengthening training requirements and closing gaps in current law, SB 948 will ensure responsible gun ownership to keep Californians and the community safe.”

What Arreguin didn’t present was any evidence that firearms accidents among new state residents have actually been a problem. That’s because no such evidence exists. The proposal is yet another solution looking for a problem.

Opponents called the bill what it is. Adam Wilson, speaking for Gun Owners of California and Gun Owners of America, called it “a misguided piece of legislation that masquerades as gun safety, but in reality wreaks an insurmountable barrier to exercising a constitutional right.”

“This bill will transform California’s existing FSC into a de facto licensing scheme,” Wilson said at the hearing.

Wilson also noted that SB 948 would saddle license applicants with an estimated $400 cost, disproportionately harming women, people of color, and lower-income residents — many of whom live in higher-crime neighborhoods where the right to self-defense matters most.

“SB 948 is a modern-day poll tax on the Second Amendment, and at its core, SB 948 raises serious constitutional issues,” he said.

Having cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee, the measure now heads to a vote on the Senate floor.

Categories
All About Guns Born again Cynic! Paint me surprised by this Soldiering that’s too bad” The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People You have to be kidding, right!?!

The 24th, Buffalo Soldiers, and the Houston Mutiny of 1917 | Based on a True Story

Categories
Born again Cynic! California

This sums up my State of California well !

Categories
Born again Cynic! The Green Machine War Well I thought it was funny! You have to be kidding, right!?!

Somebody paid attention in school!

Categories
Born again Cynic! Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom

And now you know!

Categories
Born again Cynic!

How Big Tech Killed Local News and Targeted our Second Amendment Freedoms by Scott Witner

How Big Tech Killed Local News

Here’s something the mainstream media won’t tell you about the mainstream media: its anti-gun bias isn’t just ideological. It’s structural. And it was built by Silicon Valley’s ad machine, not by a shadowy cabal of editorial writers sitting around plotting your disarmament.

The Numbers Don’t Lie

In 2000, newspapers accounted for roughly 53 percent of U.S. ad spending. By 2020, that number had collapsed to about 5 percent, according to the Congressional Research Service. The revenue didn’t disappear — it moved to Google, Meta, Amazon, and TikTok.

The fallout was immediate and severe. More than a third of U.S. newspapers operating in the mid-2000s are no longer in operation. Newsroom employment dropped by about 26 percent between 2008 and 2020 — roughly 30,000 jobs. Newspaper newsrooms alone shrank by 57 percent.

Few industries have seen that kind of collapse outside of video rental stores or one-hour photo shops.

The Local Press Was the Counterweight

Local newspapers were never flashy, but they mattered. They balanced the national narrative coming out of outlets like the New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. A paper in rural Ohio or central Texas was written by people familiar with firearms — people who hunted, carried, or grew up around guns.

As those papers disappeared, so did that viewpoint. What replaced it was national wire coverage from AP and Reuters, filtered through editorial frameworks that often treat common firearms as anomalies or threats.

Local journalism functioned as a decentralizing force, the media equivalent of federalism. It kept coverage grounded in reality. That check is largely gone.

Who’s Left in the Newsroom

What replaced it? Centralized newsrooms staffed by people who are statistically less likely to have ever held a firearm, let alone owned one. These newsrooms look to the Times as their style guide on everything from grammar to gun politics. They want to be in the cool crowd. And the cool crowd, as any gun owner can tell you, thinks you’re a problem to be solved.

The irony is that even the big coastal papers are showing some cracks. The Times, the Post, and the LA Times have all recently parted ways with their most stridently anti-gun opinion editors — not out of any sudden respect for the Second Amendment, but because the political winds shifted with the 2024 election cycle and they didn’t want to look completely out of touch.

They haven’t hired pro-gun replacements. But a few almost-moderate takes on firearms have squeaked through lately, which by recent standards counts as progress.

The Ecosystem has Shifted

The media ecosystem hasn’t disappeared — it’s reorganized. Independent outlets, podcasts, and subscription platforms have filled part of the void.

Pro-Second Amendment voices have more direct access to audiences than they did two decades ago.

But the broader landscape is more segmented. Media alignment now mirrors political alignment. The middle ground that once existed — including pro-gun Democrats and regionally diverse newsroom perspectives — has narrowed significantly.

Bottom Line

The mainstream media’s hostility toward the Second Amendment isn’t just about bias. It’s about who survived the economic apocalypse that Big Tech brought down on local journalism, and who didn’t.

The people still shaping the narrative are, in many cases, far removed from the communities and culture they’re covering.

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Cops

TSA Was Never Really About Your Safety…

Categories
Born again Cynic! Cops

A Law to Jail Bad Politicians? – Washington Gun Law

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Cops

Don’t Abuse the Word ‘Protester’ By Rich Lowry

A gun shot perforation in a window pane can be seen in front of a makeshift memorial for Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, Minn., January 26, 2026.(Roberto Schmidt/AFP via Getty Images)
That’s not what Alex Pretti was.

Alex Pretti wasn’t killed while “protesting.”

This is the most common description of what he was doing on that Minneapolis street last weekend when he got in a confrontation with federal immigration agents that ended in his tragic shooting.

But if Pretti was merely a protester, we need to change the definition.

A protester, as typically understood, is someone who is making a point, often as part of a gathering of other like-minded people and, usually but not always, in opposition to something.

A protester might hold a sign outside a coal-fired power plant calling for it to shut down.

He might go to Union Square Park in New York City to hear speeches from bullhorns whenever something happens that outrages the left.

He might march against the Iraq War, or the Vietnam War — or in favor of Hamas.

This kind of activity is not to everyone’s taste — personally, I hate the drums and the chants — but there is no doubt that it is a legitimate form of political advocacy.

Depending on the cause, it can even be admirable.

What we are seeing in Minneapolis, though, is often quite different. Run-of-the-mill protesters don’t seek out federal agents and harass and obstruct them. They don’t follow and block their vehicles or establish a robust communications network to deploy resources creating maximum disruption of their operations.

We all are very familiar with how clashes between protesters and police usually go: A contingent of cops faces an unruly crowd along a skirmish line, and the advance guard of the crowd gets more and more aggressive, or the cops begin to move in to disperse the crowd. One way or the other, mayhem ensues. We’ve all seen it hundreds of times.

This is different. Opponents of ICE are, in an organized effort, tracking agents and showing up at operations to stop them from doing their job or make it as difficult as possible. This is more a form of low-level, (by and large) nonviolent insurgency than conventional protest.

And Pretti was part of this effort. It’s more accurate to describe him as an agitator, or — depending on the level of his involvement in the ICE network — even as an operator, than a protester.

The point is to influence events, by direct involvement, rather than simply observe or protest them.

It is telling that, according to CNN, Pretti was injured in a prior confrontation with ICE agents a week before his death.

The fact of the matter is that if Pretti had indeed been only protesting last weekend, he’d still be alive today. He would have stayed on the sidewalk and held up a sign, or chanted “ICE go home,” and the officers might have been annoyed, but they presumably wouldn’t have interacted with him, and there wouldn’t have been any encounter with the potential to go catastrophically wrong.

The calculation in Minneapolis has been that this kind of benign activity is less effective than direct action, and unfortunately — with public opinion swinging against Operation Metro Surge and Trump apparently looking for a climb-down — this assessment looks to be accurate.

We can disagree about the desirability of the goal that Pretti was pursuing, but there’s no doubt about how he was pursuing it, and it wasn’t through conventional protest.