Categories
All About Guns Some Scary thoughts

The Future of American Policing

Written by: Greg Ellifritz
I had two different friends send me messages last weekend requesting my thoughts on what policing is going to look like in the future.  I thought about it quite a bit and here are my predictions.
We have to recognize that police are a part of our society as a whole.  Our society is changing and those changes will drive all future changes in police work.  As I see it, there are four primary cultural drivers that will affect police work in the future.
1) Protests/Police Hate- It’s becoming ever harder to be a cop.  Two decades ago, there was an unwritten rule.  Cops dealing with criminals was “business.” Very few folks got offended on either side. We knew the crooks were going to commit crimes. They knew we would try to catch them.
When we caught them, they usually complied. If they ran or took a poke at the officer there were no hard feelings. If you hit a cop, you knew you were going to get beaten down by his buddies or struck with a baton. That was the cost of doing business.
I remember several of the criminals with whom I threw down shaking my hand afterwards and saying “I know you were just doing your job, and you know I had to try to get away. Get me some ice for this bump on my head and I’ll cooperate with the slating process. We’re all good.”
That spirit of fair play is gone now. Now every use of force is a complaint and/or a lawsuit. Now every police shooting involves threats and protests at the officers’ houses and a doxxing of his entire family.  Often these protests and threats are organized by uninvolved virtue signaling “community activists” who have no connection to the event and lack even a fundamental knowledge of the legal rules by which officers operate.
A couple decades ago there were also a few more unstated assumptions.  The first is that unless an officer did something criminal or especially heinous, the community generally supported the police.  Most officers believed their administration would stand up for them if they did the right thing.  Now neither assumption is in play.  In most communities, the residents distrust the police.  Administrators now bow to community pressure to suspend or fire every officer who gets involved in some politically distasteful event.
How do you think these changing trends will affect our police force?  Would you like to be a police officer in today’s environment?  There will be fewer quality police candidates in the future.
2) General government “defunding” due to pandemic economic decline/collapse.  The economic effects caused from Covid-19 are just beginning to become apparent.  I think the economy will get far worse in the next couple years.  Fewer people working means less tax money going to cities and states.
Government revenues are going to drop significantly.  That effects police budgets.  Then we have the active efforts to “defund” the police by cutting budgets even further.  Both of these conditions will reduce police numbers, police salaries, and police equipment budgets.  That will drive even more officers away from police careers.

Stats from BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-51706225

3). Distrust for and politicization of all government entities.  Public approval of almost all government functions is at an all time low.  The generalized distrust of government  and politicians will further erode the public’s support of the police and young applicants’ desire to become part of the system.
4). The rise in technology (especially surveillance and AI facial recognition technology).  Within the next decade, we will see more surveillance cameras in public areas.  Use of drones and “shot spotter” type systems will increase.  Future criminals will not be caught by cops on patrol.  They will be identified by a guy sitting at a desk running surveillance video through facial recognition software.

 

Once the criminal is identified, his mobile tracking device (cell phone) will be accessed with a search warrant or some type of commercial database software.  Teams of armed cops will know where the criminal is at all times and will make plans to arrest him in the safest way possible.

 

Many of our future “cops” will be computer analysts.  Those specialized analysts will be paid less than they would in the private market.  They will supplement their salaries by taking bribes from wealthy constituents to use the surveillance systems to gather dirt on political enemies.  Trust in the police will further erode and many police jobs will be highly politicized.

When I look at those four trends all occurring simultaneously, I can predict the generalized future of policing in America.  Here’s what I prognosticate…
 
Fewer and fewer people will want to be cops. That will further lower hiring and training standards.  Tax revenue losses and “defunding efforts” will drive salaries down and make working conditions more difficult.  The only folks who will become cops in the future are those people who have no other career options.
 
As more and more low quality candidates are hired, public trust for the police will further erode.  The police will become continually more corrupt and inept until they are almost useless.
The really good cops (and a lot of former soldiers) will move on to better paying private security positions. The rich will hire those security people as bodyguards and neighborhood patrols.
 
The middle class and poor well have to contend with the corrupt police system or take care of things themselves (either by vigilante or gang action.)
 
This is essentially how it works in many third world countries. I have lots of experience traveling in Peru, so I’ll use the capital city of Lima as an example.
 
In the most affluent neighborhoods you don’t see many cops. But there are professional armed security guards at all banks, many public businesses and on roving patrol in marked vehicles in the neighborhood at night.
 
In the poorer neighborhoods, you don’t see many cops either. They’ll respond to something serious, but don’t expect them to investigate some kind of minor property crime without a significant bribe.
 
Most of the lower class residents ignore any petty criminal stuff.  They band up with family or friends to handle any serious business. Sometimes the residents will pay the local criminal gangs to take care of such problems instead if they have some extra cash.  The bad guy gets beaten or taken out.  The cops don’t work hard to find the perpetrators of these crimes because they know exactly what is happening.

Note safety differences between neighborhoods in Lima, Peru. The green zones are wealthy areas that hire private security patrols.

I predict this type of public/private division will be the most likely way things will evolve.  The wealthy will take care of themselves by paying private security and bribing corrupt cops to gather dirt on enemies and political rivals.  The poor will be left to handle things themselves without significant productive police presence.
It could, however, shake out another way.  Instead of the public/private divide, we might see a geographical division.  There will likely be pockets of effective law enforcement (generally managed by publicly elected county sheriffs) left around the country.  The well off may simply move to those “safe” areas that have invested in quality public servants.  Property values and home values will rapidly rise in those areas, crowding out many of the low income residents.
The wealthy will be cared for.  They will either import private security to the areas where they currently live or move to the locations where a professional policing has been maintained.  The middle and lower class residents will be victimized more frequently and will engage in low-key vigilante actions to handle most criminal problems.

Poorer neighborhoods in South America embed glass atop concrete walls to serve as a theft deterrent. We’ll start seeing things like that here within the next decade.

Most of you will be forced to take care of yourself and your family.  Unless you are wealthy or politically connected, the cops won’t be coming to help you in the future.  Your options are to improve individual skill levels to be able to personally handle violent actors, band up with friends or family to create a numerical advantage for vigilante action, or increase your economic status enough to live in a “protected” area.
I believe things are going to look very different in America 10 years from now.  Most of those changes will be negative.  I don’t see any way to stop it or alter the trends.  Most of our country will look more like the developing world than the environment we currently enjoy.  Be ready for when that occurs.  It will happen far more rapidly than you might think.
Categories
Some Scary thoughts

Why is Japan Fortifying its Small Islands, and why is it such a big deal? | Foreign Correspondent

Categories
Interesting stuff Some Red Hot Gospel there! Some Scary thoughts War

Peace At Any Price by Laughing Wolf

Earlier this week, the always excellent and interesting Baldilocks shared a thread on Twitter dealing with the perceptions and thoughts of a certain class of Russians in regards the war. The thread is well worth reading, as are some of the comments to her tweet and my retweet.

What was reported matches what I am seeing and hearing from that class, and from others. For all that one must support the war in public, or face draconian consequences, even in private it has a lot of support. As in a WAG on my part of better than fifty percent. Yes, there are segments that don’t support and are not thrilled with things, and they tend to fall more on ethnic lines from what I’m seeing. Overall, the war has a surprising strong, wide, and deep level of support within Russia. Not universal, but pretty darn significant.

Support for Vladimir remains quite high. This varies as one goes through demographics and ethnicities, but overall strong. Two areas where this may not be true are in what I call the political oligarchia: the politicians, power brokers, oligarchs, and wanna-be oligarchs who make up the upper levels of power. The old nomenklatura concept is dead and gone. In public, this upper level is very pro-Vladimir. In private, well, it’s still not clear to me if some of what is going on behind the scenes is simply preparation for his retirement or death, or if there is something more active going on. To be fair, there are days I’m not sure those playing the great game in Russia truly know themselves. The other area is the bottom of the demographics pile, which tends to be ‘yeah, support, whatever; none of them give a damn about us.’ That may be as close to a universal concept across cultures as anything.

An important point within this is the response of that educated class to the pushback by Ukraine, NATO, and others. Note the surprise, shock even, that Europe and others not only opposed the invasion, but that they are helping Ukraine (most of whom are sadly misled and should be welcoming the return of Russia) resist. That they would potentially gut their economies to do so. This is seen as bigotry and ignorance by that class of Russians. And by others within Russia, to be honest.

That plays almost perfectly into the great Russian paranoia that everyone is out to get them. That has been a hallmark of Rus/Slav psychology going back into ancient times. They have always been treacherously set upon by others, even as they were peacefully raping, murdering, and pillaging those that set upon them. Now, Russia does have a few legitimate times when they weren’t doing something like that at the time they were attacked, but I am overall reminded of a certain criminal class here in the U.S. that was never ‘doing nothing’ when “attacked” by those they were robbing, etc.

It also brings to the fore a concept that seems to continue to elude far too many: outside reactions and considerations were not and are not a factor of consideration. The war was not started with Western or other reaction in mind, other than that it was felt that the Biden Regency and others would just go along with it and not do anything of significance against it. Token reparations maybe, but that was it. Given that the Regency and the Meat Puppet seemed to be egging it on at one point, I can see how they thought that. But, that was only a fleeting thought to them and not even a serious point of consideration.

The dynamics that drove the decision to invade are almost entirely internal. They are based in culture, politics, and other areas that create the internal dynamics that are not understood and not even being considered by far too many outside of Russia. There is no path to peace without taking those dynamics, and the overwhelming support for the war and for creating a new Russkiy Mir, into consideration.

Therein lies the problem. Outside opinions and even responses do not matter to the large majority of the population of the Russian Federation. At best, such are seen as bigotry and an attack. At worst, they were not even a consideration. That holds true for the leadership as well. For all intents and purposes, the people of the Russian Federation live in a bubble, and the upper leadership lives in an even more dense and impenetrable bubble.

Stephen Green, who does some truly great coverage I do recommend reading, has two (sadly VIP) posts up, here and here, on “Putin’s Stupid and Unnecessary War.” By our standards, completely true and valid statements. The war is stupid, unnecessary, and even foolish. From a Russian societal perspective, however, it is extremely necessary and even overdue. Stephen asks a good question that I can see before it hits the paywall, about the military leadership should have known the military was not ready and should have prevented the war as a result.

Again, by our standards and culture, an obvious point. By the standards of Russian culture, however, invalid. Keep in mind the two bubbles already mentioned, as there are more. Vladimir sacked a lot of real generals a while back so that various apparatchiks, oligarchs, and wanna-be oligarchs could get in on the fun of what we would see as outright corruption. Russians today just see it as how business is done. Those that were smart cut officers in on the take, and smart officers made sure the men didn’t starve. As it was, the troops often looted items to sell on the black so they got pay, food, etc. Gundecking reports has a long and honorable tradition in Russia going back almost to the very earliest days. Yet more bubbles, and people who needed to know things didn’t. Given the lack of esteem given to the military these days, the general public and leadership really didn’t care if they starved or not, or what was happening to them. Or what would happen if they had to go to war.

It was only when war came, and some people got a cold douche of reality, that anything began to change. Part of that change was that a number of people in demographics and ethnicity that meant they would be called up to fight decided to beat feet. Quite a few citizens of the Russian Federation, and not just the government, consider them traitors to be dealt with later and who should never ever think of returning to the Rodina. Understand, your average citizen of the Russian Federation has no problem with people dying for the war and the cause of Russkiy Mir — so long as it’s not them. Marginalized groups or ethnicities? Who cares, it will improve the gene pool.

Nuclear war? Go for it. Our mighty Russian military will protect us while devastating our enemies. We have far more bombs and missiles than they do. We have far greater, more powerful, and more accurate defenses against missiles and other attacks.

That their nuclear and nuclear defense forces might be in a shape similar to their other weapons and stockpiles has penetrated few if any bubbles as far as I can tell. How many will work (on either side)? Who knows, and I’d really rather not find out. That said, I’m in the camp of 20 percent, i.e. an 80 percent failure rate. In light of this, I also highly recommend reading this from Sgt. Mom. Our own military is in many ways in no better shape. We are not capable of fighting a one front war for more than a few days (if that), much less a two-front war as we are supposed to be able to do.

Which leads us, finally, to the growing “peace at any price crowd.” I’m seeing it a lot on social media these days, and from some surprising quarters. As I noted in posts before, putting in place a cease fire or a forced peace as things stand will only guarantee a far worse war with far worse consequences later. Even one that gives Ukraine the Donbas and Russia the Crimea will result in the same. See this post and this post for some of the previous discussion on outcomes.

Right now, I do not see any easy, good outcomes. Far too much of what is being discussed and pushed is not in touch with the reality of Russian culture and internal dynamics, much less that of Ukraine. Anything that does not take such into consideration will fail. Spectacularly. Creating something viable, or at least make each step suck the least, requires strong, informed, and capable leadership. Looking at the Biden Regency, Castreaux, Macaroon, Charles/Sunak, Shultz, Vladimir, etc., yeah, right.

Prepare, pray, and hope for the best. It’s about all we truly can do right now.

Getting hit by lightning is not fun! If you w

Categories
Some Scary thoughts The Horror!

Just another way to end life as we know it

Categories
N.S.F.W. Some Scary thoughts

Auntie May !?!

Categories
Some Scary thoughts

Some Red Hot Gospel there!

Categories
Some Scary thoughts War

How A Secret War Between the USSR and Israel Almost Caused World War 3 | Unpacked

Categories
Some Scary thoughts

Polish military modernisation & why are they buying Korean tanks?

Categories
Some Scary thoughts War You have to be kidding, right!?!

Chinese robot attack dog with machine gun dropped by drone

https://youtu.be/bJRaLTvO3LU

Categories
Some Scary thoughts The Green Machine

‘The Big One Is Coming’ and the U.S. Military Isn’t Ready A U.S. flag officer talks candidly about the fading U.S. deterrent. by The WSJ

WSJ Opinion: The U.S. Military’s Growing Weakness
Review and Outlook: The Heritage Foundation’s latest ‘Index of U.S. Military Strength’ warns of declining power in the U.S. Navy and Air Force. Images: Department of Defence/Heritage Foundation Composite: Mark Kelly
Listen to article
Length(3 minutes)

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine revealed the fading power of America’s military deterrent, a fact that too few of our leaders seem willing to admit in public. So it is encouraging to hear a senior flag officer acknowledge the danger in a way that we hope is the start of a campaign to educate the American public.

OPINION: FREE EXPRESSION

“This Ukraine crisis that we’re in right now, this is just the warmup,” Navy Admiral Charles Richard, commander of U.S. Strategic Command, said this week at a conference. “The big one is coming. And it isn’t going to be very long before we’re going to get tested in ways that we haven’t been tested” for “a long time.”

How bad is it? Well, the admiral said, “As I assess our level of deterrence against China, the ship is slowly sinking. It is sinking slowly, but it is sinking, as fundamentally they are putting capability in the field faster than we are.” Sinking slowly is hardly a consolation. As “those curves keep going,” it won’t matter “how good our commanders are, or how good our horses are—we’re not going to have enough of them. And that is a very near-term problem.”

Note that modifier “near-term.” This is a more urgent vulnerability than most of the political class cares to recognize.

Adm. Richard noted that America retains an advantage in submarines—“maybe the only true asymmetric advantage we still have”—but even that may erode unless America picks up the pace “getting our maintenance problems fixed, getting new construction going.” Building three Virginia-class fast-attack submarines a year would be a good place to start.

The news last year that China tested a hypersonic missile that flew around the world and landed at home should have raised more alarms than it did. It means China can put any U.S. city or facility at risk and perhaps without being detected. The fact that the test took the U.S. by surprise and that it surpassed America’s hypersonic capabilities makes it worse. How we lost the hypersonic race to China and Russia deserves hearings in Congress.

“We used to know how to move fast, and we have lost the art of that,” the admiral added. The military talks “about how we are going to mitigate our assumed eventual failure” to field new ballistic submarines, bombers or long-range weapons, instead of flipping the question to ask: “What’s it going to take? Is it money? Is it people? Do you need authorities?” That’s “how we got to the Moon by 1969.”

Educating the public about U.S. military weaknesses runs the risk of encouraging adversaries to exploit them. But the greater risk today is slouching ahead in blind complacency until China invades Taiwan or takes some other action that damages U.S. interests or allies because Bejiing thinks the U.S. can do nothing about it.

A U.S. Navy walks on the deck of aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan where F-18 fighter jets are parked during a goodwill visit in Manila, Philippines, Oct. 14.PHOTO: ELOISA LOPEZ/REUTERS

Appeared in the November 5, 2022, print edition as ‘‘The Big One Is Coming’’.