Category: Uncategorized

The Springfield Armory M1A Tanker represents the synergistic combination of a compact, full-power rifle with a timelessly attractive aesthetic. Pushing a full-sized 7.62x51mm/.308 Win. round in a chassis that lends itself to maneuverability and easy portage, the M1A Tanker also captures some of that classic inimitable Parkerized steel and stained walnut of a bygone era.

For the American shooter looking for practical utility with a spritz of class, the M1A Tanker is your iron.

Why Do We Do This, Anyway?

The modern American enthusiasm for firearms usually distills down to three different discrete attributes — practicality, appeal and nostalgia. Most of us select our working guns based upon their effectiveness as defensive tools. First and foremost, if I might conceivably use this thing to defend my family, it has to run perfectly and shoot straight.

Additionally, guns are cool, but they also need to be fun. If the shooting experience isn’t enjoyable, that’s a disincentive to train. The fanciest, most expensive defensive firearm in the world is little more than ballast if you haven’t practiced with it enough to run it well. A working gun needs to seduce you into range time.

Lastly, we Americans enjoy a heritage of shooting that is unparalleled anywhere on the planet. Revisionist rantings of the less durable members of our society notwithstanding, guns are an integral part of our cultural DNA. Personal ownership and lawful use of firearms have been foundational parts of the American experience since the very beginning.

In my humble opinion, the Springfield Armory M1A Tanker checks all three of these blocks admirably.

Specifications

Here are the Springfield M1A specs:

Chambering	.308 Win
Barrel Length	16.25″
Weight	8 lbs, 9 oz
Overall Length	37.25″
Sights	Ghost ring
Stock	Walnut
Action	Semi-auto
Magazine Capacity	10 (one included)
MSRP	$2,026

Practical Tactical

The M1A Tanker packs the unrivaled reliability and downrange horsepower of the classic government-issue M14 into a semi-auto-only package that is a full 7″ shorter and 10 oz. lighter than the standard G.I. rifle. The Tanker is faster in enclosed spaces while retaining much of the downrange performance of the larger, heavier, longer firearm. This format has been proven in the high-tech Springfield Armory M1A SOCOM 16 CQB rifle.

I have maintained a nicely accessorized M1A SOCOM 16 CQB rifle next to the door in my own home for years now. The M1A Tanker is essentially the same rifle without so much Information Age polymer bling.

The operating system of the M1A Tanker is the same combat-proven, gas-operated design that defined the M14 rifle. The operating rod drives the rotating bolt that locks the action in place at the moment of firing by means of a cam. The weapon feeds semi-automatically from a detachable steel box magazine.

The M1A Tanker features a tuned two-stage National Match trigger that sports a crisp 5-lb. break. The front sight includes a radioactive tritium insert, while the rear is a ghost ring for rapid engagements. The stubby muzzle brake helps tame the chaos up front. The gun comes with a single ten-round magazine, but accepts any G.I.-standard 20-round boxes or increased-capacity drums.

Springfield Armory also offers a range of tactical accessories to make your great gun even greater. Two different scope mounting solutions thread in place without any gunsmithing and let you mount up any sort of tactical optic. Slings, bipods and cleaning gear expand the utility of the M1A Tanker as well.

Reaching Out

The M1A Tanker is hefty enough to manage the recoil from those big .308 cartridges, but still sufficiently svelte as to facilitate easy portage. The M1A Tanker runs quickly and well at bad breath ranges but also readily accepts a proper telescopic sight should you wish to stretch its legs a bit. In the hands of a skilled marksman with some proper glass, the M1A Tanker becomes a 500-meter rifle.

The traditional M1A rifle that inspires the M1A Tanker is an integral part of the American shooting experience. Long-range competitors compete with this gun all the time, and it is a fixture at American firing ranges from sea to shining sea. Show up at your local shooting facility with an M1A Tanker in tow, and you’ll likely make a few new like-minded friends.

Whether your mission is to draw smiley faces at fifty meters, shred a silhouette across the room or ring steel at half a kilometer, the M1A Tanker will do all those things and look good in the process. The limiting factor is your willingness to invest the resources and time to accomplish these goals. As with much of life, getting there really is half the fun.

History of the Tanker

There’s just something viscerally appealing about stained walnut and Parkerized steel. The M1A Tanker draws its inspiration and its name from the elusive “Tanker” M1 Garand. After a little homework, it turns out the Tanker Garand was never actually a real thing — at least not for tankers.

In 1944, with the world in flames, Springfield Armory engineers were tasked to develop a shortened version of the M1 Garand as part of a broader effort to adapt and improve various infantry weapons for the anticipated invasion of the Japanese home islands. The original Garand was everything the legends made it out to be, but it was nearly four feet long and weighed as much as a modest microwave. American G.I.’s might need something handier.

That initial effort was classified as the M1E5, and it was fairly disappointing. The M1E5 incorporated an uncomfortable folding steel pantograph stock and produced a simply breathtaking muzzle flash from its 18” barrel when fired after dark. Testing at Aberdeen Proving Ground demonstrated that accuracy out to 300 yards was not appreciably diminished over that of the full-sized rifle. However, the complicated folding stock did not hold up terribly well, and the noise and muzzle flash were brutal to the operators.

Meanwhile, the Pacific Warfare Board (PWB) tasked the Ordnance Division of the 6^th Army in the Philippines to create some 15,000 shortened M1 rifles for use in confined jungle and urban environments. The result was 150 field-modified samples. The PWB conversions also featured 18″ barrels along with standard wooden buttstocks.

In October of 1944, an ad hoc testing unit consisting of three platoon leaders assigned to the 503d Parachute Infantry Regiment Combat Team carried three of these stubby prototype rifles into combat on Noemfoor Island in New Guinea. As expected, the compact geometry was appreciated, but the massive muzzle flash that resulted when the rifles were fired at night was notable. The ending of the war in 1945 ensured that the project faded into obscurity. And a great irony of what we know as the “Tanker Garand” is that it was created for paratroopers.

A couple of these modified weapons did make it back to the Massachusetts Springfield Armory and inspired the similar but different T26. The T26 was the result of the armory receiving a request from the PWB to produce 15,000 shorty M1s for the anticipated invasion of Japan. The T26 also had its barrel shortened from 24″ to 18″. Unlike the M1E5, the T26 used a standard wood Garand stock. As noted earlier, the ending of the war scuttled the long-term viability of this project.

In the unique civilian firearms milieu that followed World War II, the country was awash in freshly minted combat veterans and surplus weapons without a whole lot of extraneous gun laws. As a result, enterprising gun sellers chopped back G.I.-surplus M1 rifles to produce the infamous “Tanker” Garand. The novelty of the thing made them brisk sellers. The practical motivations were quite sound.

And, whatever the historical background of the concept, the benefits of a short, handy and powerful .30-cal. semi-automatic rifle are hard to ignore. This leads us to the M1A Tanker we are reviewing here now.

Shooting Results

The following loads were shot through the M1A Tanker for this review. Here is what was measured:

	Velocity	Group Size
Federal Ammunition 175 gr Gold Medal MatchKing BTHP	2,447 fps	2.0″
Gorilla Ammunition 175 gr MatchKing BTHP	2,312 fps	1.1″
Winchester Ammunition 150 gr Deer Season XP Copper Impact	2,590 fps	2.4″

The group size is the best four of five shots measured from center to center. These rounds were shot from a simple rest with the stock ghost ring sights at a distance of 50 meters.

Velocity measurements were made with a Caldwell Ballistic Chronograph. The chronograph was set up at 10′ from the muzzle. Velocity measurements reported are an average of three shots.

Practical Applications

The M1A Tanker brings along unrivaled real-world practicality. This compact rifle would reliably put venison on the table for both sport and survival. It is easy to tote and sufficiently powerful as to give a polar bear pause. Whether it is strapped to the handlebars of your ATV or slung across your shoulder while you’re trekking in the wilderness, the M1A Tanker is the sort of insurance that really is always there for you, come what may.

Shooting is fun and shooting such a rarefied rifle all the more so. Putting a couple of boxes of .308 brass on the ground on a pretty Saturday afternoon at the range will reliably dissolve the stresses of the previous week. Save that brass and you can acquaint yourself with the many-splendored joys of handloading. The stubby barrel does produce some prodigious muzzle blast, but the rifle doesn’t beat you to death despite its full-power chambering.

Lastly, if the unthinkable happened and you had to grab a gun for real, the M1A Tanker checks all the boxes. This stubby rifle is short enough to serve as a truck gun yet sufficiently comfortable and accurate to reliably reach out at any reasonable defensive engagement distance. Additionally, nobody who brought a semi-automatic magazine-fed .308 rifle to a fight has even once been accused of packing too little gun.

Ruminations

The M1A Tanker is not for everyone. Some folks could never make practical use of the Tanker’s range and power. Springfield Armory has an entire stable of 5.56mm rifles just standing by should that be the case. Others are just not cool enough to rock a rifle this awesome. To those of my brethren take heart, keep working at it and someday you could yet become this cool.

The Springfield Armory M1A Tanker comfortably addresses the gun nerd’s triad of practicality, appeal and nostalgia. No matter the application, the Tanker performs reliably and well. It is a classic rifle nicely upgraded for the Information Age that is as attractive as it is effective. The M1A Tanker runs well and looks great.

 

A poll conducted by University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics shows nearly one-third of American voters believe they may have to take up arms against the United States government.

The poll of 1,000 registered voters was conducted from “May 19 to May 23 among 1,000 registered voters. The margin of error is plus or minus 3.53 percentage points,” The Hill reports.

“Republican pollster Neil Newhouse and Democratic pollster Joel Benenson with input from students at the [Institute of Politics]” conducted the survey.

On July 24, the Hill reported the pollsters found that “twenty-eight percent of all voters, including 37 percent of gun owners, agreed ‘it may be necessary at some point soon for citizens to take up arms against the government.’”

When responses were broken down by party affiliation, the poll showed 33 percent of Republican voters and 35 percent of Independent voters believe it may be necessary to take up arms.

One in every five Democrat voters believe they may have to take up arms as well.

The poll shows that nearly half of American voters–49 percent–agree with the statement that they “more and more feel like a stranger in my own country.”

A majority of American voters agree with the statement claiming the United States government is “corrupt and rigged against everyday people like me.” While this view was most prominent among Republicans and self-identified conservatives, even “51 percent of voters who call themselves ‘very liberal’ also agreed.”

AWR Hawkins is an award-winning Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and the writer/curator of Down Range with AWR Hawkins, a weekly newsletter focused on all things Second Amendment, also for Breitbart News. He is the political analyst for Armed American Radio and a Turning Point USA Ambassador. Follow him on Instagram: @awr_hawkins. Reach him at awrhawkins@breitbart.com. You can sign up to get Down Range at breitbart.com/downrange.

.

 

Marines zig-zagged across the valley, dodging bullets and explosions in a sea of utter chaos. Men lunged towards any cover they could find and crouched, frozen. Others lay motionless, dead, their lifeblood draining in that godforsaken hellhole. The sounds of exploding shells and cries of imminent death were deafening.

Marine sniper, Daniel W. Cass, and his spotter, Corporal Clarence Carter, along with their unit, were assigned to rescue marines pinned down in the Wana Gorge Valley by Japanese machine guns.  Cass was a nineteen-year-old grunt then, Carter just two years older. It would be their first run as snipers.

As they peered over a ridge overlooking the valley, 1,200 yards separated Cass and Carter from enemy nests below a coral ledge. It would be a long shot, with wind, heat waves and fog distorting the scope’s visibility. No time to look for a better position. Marines below were being ripped to shreds.

Using his rifle scope, Cass surveyed the area, scanning for movement or smoke. Looking through his spotter scope, Carter suddenly said, “I found them.” Cass followed his spotter’s point and saw the distinct muzzle flame flickering through the fog. He dropped his scope elevation until his crosshairs were directly on a speck of gray uniform.

Deep breath. Let half out. Hold. Crosshair, crosshair, squeeze.

The bullet hit the enemy’s nest. “I fired and worked the bolt, fired and worked the bolt, pouring accurate fire into Japanese defenses.” At some point, the machine gun fire stopped. The Japanese retreated. Slowly, the marines rose cautiously to their feet and trudged forward. One turned and waved thanks. [1]

                        ___________________

Such are the experiences of military snipers. Though the historic settings and missions have differed, the courage, sense of duty, the infallible bond with his comrades in arms remain the raison d’être for soldiers in the pits of hell. The psychology of combatants’ willingness to kill has filled volumes and is too complex to cover in brief, but Lt. Col. Dave Grossman, in his seminal work, On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society, states, “A tremendous volume of research indicates that the primary factor that motivates a soldier to do the things that no man wants to do in combat is not the force of self-preservation but a powerful sense of accountability to his comrades on the battlefield.” [2]

Sniper Training 

Armed with weapons designed for accuracy and long-range targets, snipers are highly trained in precision shooting. But marksmanship is only part of a sniper’s skill set. They are masters of camouflage, concealment, infiltration, reconnaissance, navigation, and survival, making the task of locating them a daunting and frustrating ordeal for the enemy. A sniper is capable of inflicting heavy losses on opposing forces, and in many cases, an entire unit can be brought to a halt by the presence of a single sniper.

While it is not unheard of for snipers to operate alone, they generally work in two- to four-man teams for greater efficiency: one man focuses solely on shooting, the other assists in observing the area and spotting other targets. The spotter is also tasked with maintaining communication with other units, observing the atmospheric conditions, providing security, and coordinating artillery and air support. Sniper teams typically operate independently but never far forward from their main units. [3]

“One man, one kill.”

Snipers are trained to observe. Concealed in their surroundings, they maintain visual contact with their targets to gather as much intelligence as possible while eluding the enemy’s detection. They may spend hours or even days, frozen in position, observing the area or stalking the enemy. Heat, vermin, snakes, nature’s call are challenges that often need to be ignored. A great deal of time is dedicated to reconnaissance before a sniper engages his target, and with the sensitive political nature of today’s urban conflicts, a sniper must always consider the potential of collateral damage.

All military branches train and utilize snipers, with service-specific training programs lasting five to twelve weeks. Sniper candidates volunteer for consideration and must be recommended by their unit commanders. They must meet criteria in the areas of marksmanship, physical condition including visual acuity, mental and emotional balance, ability to learn intelligence equipment and reports, and familiarity with the natural environment.

Origin of Term “Sniper”

The term “sniper” originated in British India in the 1770s, where British officers practiced their sharpshooting skills by targeting a highly elusive bird called a snipe. The earliest documented use of the word is found in a 1782 letter from George Selwyn to Lord Carlisle, in which he wrote, “Now people have been shot by platoons and in corps, the individual will be popped at or sniped, as they call it, from time to time…” [4]

In the United States, the art of sniping was first developed during the American Revolutionary War by Patriots fighting for independence from Great Britain. American colonists who displayed an aptitude for sharpshooting had typically spent years developing and honing their marksmanship skills through hunting in the rugged wilderness of the continent. Utilized as snipers, these men would first take out British field officers, thereby eliminating the enemy’s leadership. This tactic was extremely controversial because it went against the conventional doctrine of warfare at the time. The British considered it uncivilized and dishonorable, but it proved highly effective on the battlefield. While the weapons and tactics used since then have evolved, the concept behind a sniper’s mission remains the same. [5]

Riveting accounts of the longest shots and the deadliest ambushes have taken us to battlefields from the American Revolution to current combat zones. In the long history of the United States, there have been several warriors whose skills and notable feats have played a major role in the conflicts they fought. Click “Related Articles” below to learn of their incredible stories and how their actions made a major impact on the battlefields.

As always, the objective must be not to judge, but simply to understand. ~Lt. Col. Dave Grossman

Sources

1. Charles W. Sasser, Craig Roberts, One Shot One Kill (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1990) 66-77.
2. Dave Grossman, On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1995), 184.
3. United States Army, Sniper Training Field Manual 3-22.10, 19 October 2009. Ch. 1, sections 1-5.
4. Notes and Queries: A Medium of Intercommunication, Ninth series, Vol. III (London: John C. Francis, 1899), 138
5. Gregory Mast and Hans Halberstadt, To Be a Military Sniper (Minneapolis: Zenith Press, 2007), 17-23. Also: Martin Pegler, Out of Nowhere: A History of the Military Sniper from the Sharpshooter to Afghanistan (Oxford: Osprey Publishing, 2011).

Additional Sources

1. Christopher Woody, “The Grimy and Grueling Training of Army Snipers,” Business Insider, Dec. 13, 2017.
2. Peter J. Kiernan, “5 Things I Learned From The Marine Corps’ Scout Sniper School,” Task & Purpose, June 13, 2016.

Recommended

• Major John L. Plaster, The History of Sniping and Sharpshooting (Colorado: Paladin Press, 2008). Definitive illustrated volume with a wealth of information and little-known details  from a decorated military marksman and instructor. Pricey but worth it.
• Excellent videos on Marine Scout Sniper selection and training in three parts from Military.com
• Website: Sniper Central – everything from training and equipment to book reviews.