Category: Gun Fearing Wussies

by Lee Williams
Patrick “Tate” Adamiak was arrested more than four years ago even though he never committed any crime. More than 40 officers led by ATF Agents kicked down his doors and ripped apart his home.
They found nothing illegal—not a thing—yet he’s starting the fourth year of his 20-year federal prison sentence.
Bottom line: He is completely innocent.
For those of you who have asked, here’s Tate’s address:
Patrick Tate Adamiak
#95252-509
Federal Correctional Institution Fort Dix
PO Box 2000
Joint Base MDL NJ, 08640
So far, we’ve written 44 stories about Tate, his family and what they are facing.
Here they are:
What Pennsylvania lawmakers are not doing for Patrick Tate Adamiak, May 19, 2026
Tate Adamiak’s letter to the new ATF director, May 13, 2026
Tate Adamiak’s upcoming ‘Diesel Therapy’ cancelled—he won, May 10, 2026
UPDATED: Tate Adamiak to receive 50 days of ‘Diesel Therapy’ punishment, May 06, 2026
SAF files amicus brief urging Supreme Court to review Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s case, May 04, 2026
How you can help free Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak, April 20, 2026
How Tate Adamiak’s 20-year sentence compares to 10 other ATF cases, Apr 14, 2026
It’s been four long years since ATF arrested Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak, Apr 08, 2026
An interview with The AK Guy, GOP candidate for U.S. House, Brandon Herrera, Apr 01, 2026
How President Trump’s ATF can help Tate Adamiak, Mar 12, 2026
Adamiak remains behind bars, guiltless but ignored by the Trump Administration, Feb 17, 2026
Behind bars: A day in the life of Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak, Dec 11, 2025
Expert firearm witness criticizes ATF’s treatment of Patrick “Tate” Adamiak, Nov 18, 2025
Even the ATF now admits inert RPGs—including Adamiak’s—are not firearms, Nov 11, 2025
How Adamiak received 20 years in prison for semi-auto Uzis and other legal guns, gun parts, Nov 04, 2025
Adamiak’s attorney strikes back at his criminal charges, Nov 01, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s criminal case now depends on his appellate attorney, Oct 21, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s appeal was quick, inconclusive, Sep 12, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s appeal relies solely on the truth, Sep 09, 2025
While gun owners strongly support Adamiak, politicians don’t, Sep 04, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s appeal will be heard in 10 days, Sep 02, 2025
Hey, ATF! Nothing you found in Tate Adamiak’s home is illegal, Aug 19, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s asks President Trump for a pardon, July 30, 2025
Adamiak: ATF’s machinegun charges are complete fiction, July 8, 2025
Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak: ‘Thanks for the help, New Jersey!’ July 1, 2025
Former ATF official: ‘Adamiak should not be in prison’ Jun 26, 2025
ATF prepping the same untruths, toy guns for Adamiak’s appeal, Jun 24, 2025
Judge unknowingly admits Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak’s inert RPGs were legal Jun 10, 2025
How Patrick ‘Tate’ Adamiak received a 20-year prison sentence May 20, 2025
How ATF falsely charged former sailor with possessing destructive devices May 13, 2025
Former sailor should be pardoned, ATF agents should be charged Apr 29, 2025
Meet the man whose lies put an innocent sailor in prison for 20 years Apr 25, 2025
How ATF used inert RPGs to imprison American sailor for two decades Apr 22, 2025
ATF wanted former sailor to serve an additional 10 years in prison for 100% legal MAC flats Apr 15, 2025
Q&A: Former sailor discusses his 20-year prison sentence, the ATF and his hope for the future Apr 08, 2025
Federal prosecutors now using ATF’s lies and fake evidence to harm former sailor’s legal appeal Apr 01, 2025
Trump should pardon innocent sailor jailed by Biden administration for 20 years Mar 18, 2025
One of the worst things ATF has ever done Feb 24, 2025
Sailor serving 20-years in prison for legal semi-auto collectibles Feb 18, 2025
How a replica STEN gun led to a sailor’s 20-year prison sentence Feb 14, 2025
Free Patrick Tate Adamiak Jan 31, 2025
ATF lied to convict sailor now serving 20 years in prison for selling legal gun parts — A SPECIAL REPORT Jan 29, 2025

If you needed yet another reason not to move to California, a new proposal in the state legislature should make the growing list.
According to a report at CalMatters, Senate Bill 948 would require gun owners moving to California to complete a four-hour course with live-fire training in order to receive the state-required Firearm Safety Certificate — and to register their firearms within 180 days of their arrival. The measure would also require existing state residents to complete the training and obtain the certificate before purchasing any firearm in the future.
Current law requires only a written exam for the Firearm Safety Certificate.
The measure, introduced in a state that already has among the most restrictive gun laws in the nation, was approved by the Senate Appropriations Committee on a party-line vote, with no Republicans supporting it. The only silver lining: the training requirement was cut in half from the eight hours originally proposed earlier in the session.
State Sen. Jesse Arreguin, who authored the measure, said the bill is critical for the safety of California citizens.
“Firearm safety is essential in preventing firearm-related incidents, especially those involving children,” Arreguin said during a legislative hearing. “By strengthening training requirements and closing gaps in current law, SB 948 will ensure responsible gun ownership to keep Californians and the community safe.”
What Arreguin didn’t present was any evidence that firearms accidents among new state residents have actually been a problem. That’s because no such evidence exists. The proposal is yet another solution looking for a problem.
Opponents called the bill what it is. Adam Wilson, speaking for Gun Owners of California and Gun Owners of America, called it “a misguided piece of legislation that masquerades as gun safety, but in reality wreaks an insurmountable barrier to exercising a constitutional right.”
“This bill will transform California’s existing FSC into a de facto licensing scheme,” Wilson said at the hearing.
Wilson also noted that SB 948 would saddle license applicants with an estimated $400 cost, disproportionately harming women, people of color, and lower-income residents — many of whom live in higher-crime neighborhoods where the right to self-defense matters most.
“SB 948 is a modern-day poll tax on the Second Amendment, and at its core, SB 948 raises serious constitutional issues,” he said.
Having cleared the Senate Appropriations Committee, the measure now heads to a vote on the Senate floor.

Less than a year after promising they weren’t “coming for anyone’s guns,” Rhode Island lawmakers just filed 18 gun control bills — including one that would criminalize possession of firearms purchased lawfully before their last ban even takes full effect.
Remember last year, when Rhode Island Democrats rammed through a sweeping ban on modern sporting rifles — the ones they love to mislabel “assault weapons” — and swore up and down they weren’t coming for anyone’s guns? They were just regulating future sales, they said. Law-abiding owners had nothing to worry about.
Yeah. About that.
At a recent House Judiciary Committee hearing, Ocean State lawmakers dropped 18 gun control bills in a single package. Not sales restrictions. Not waiting periods. Full-on possession bans. On firearms Rhode Islanders already own. Legally. Before the prior ban has even fully kicked in.
This is exactly what gun rights advocates have been screaming about for decades. And it’s precisely what the gun control crowd has been telling us would never happen.
What’s actually in the package
The 18-bill slate is a greatest-hits album of every Democrat’s wishlist:
- A direct assault on the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) via a “public nuisance” liability scheme — the same unconstitutional trick anti-gunners have been trying to run in half a dozen states, designed to bankrupt the industry through death-by-lawsuit.
- Gun rationing (because apparently the Second Amendment comes with a monthly quota).
- Background checks on ammunition.
- Mandatory training requirements.
- Mandatory liability insurance to exercise a constitutional right. Try to imagine them requiring this for voting or speech.
- And the headline-grabber: outright possession bans on commonly-owned semiautomatic rifles.
The PLCAA-targeting bill is particularly sneaky. It would force firearms manufacturers, distributors, and retailers to implement vague, undefined “reasonable controls” over how they make, sell, and market lawful products — opening them up to ruinous litigation every time a criminal misuses a gun. Which is precisely what Congress passed PLCAA to prevent.
Here’s the tell. A possession ban isn’t a regulation on commerce. It’s the confiscation of lawfully owned property, full stop.
You followed every law when you bought your rifle. You passed the background check. You filled out the 4473. You did everything they told you to do. And now Rhode Island wants to turn you into a felon for owning the same gun they approved you to buy.
Don’t take our word for it. Here’s Rep. Teresa Tanzi, the bill’s sponsor, telling the House Judiciary Committee exactly what she has in mind for firearms her constituents legally own: “We have defined which is dangerous and we have the right to regulate it into nonexistence.”
That’s not a gun safety policy. That’s an agenda.
And it comes less than a year after Governor Dan McKee signed last year’s ban with explicit assurance that the law “allows lawful owners to possess these firearms.” McKee himself has a track record on this — last year he quietly tried to slip an assault weapons ban into his budget proposal after failing to get one through the legislature the honest way.