Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Cops

Some Good Information for the Virginian Readers out there!

A State Of Emergency Does Not Affect Gun Rights In Virginia

Hurricane Shotgun Double Barrel
A State Of Emergency Does Not Affect Gun Rights In Virginia

Virginia – -(AmmoLand.com)- With the pending hurricane warnings it is a good time to remind Virginians that their right to keep and bear arms is unchanged, even in a declared state of emergency.
After the gun confiscations that took place in Louisiana immediately after Hurricane Katrina, Virginia Citizens Defense League pushed for protections in Virginia law against such a thing happening here.

The following year those protections were signed into law. In Virginia, a state of emergency has no effect on our right to keep and bear arms, unless you are in a government-run shelter:

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title44/chapter3.2/section44-146.15/

§ 44-146.15. Construction of chapter.
Nothing in this chapter is to be construed to:

(3) Empower the Governor, any political subdivision, or any other governmental authority to in any way limit or prohibit the rights of the people to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by Article I, Section 13 of the Constitution of Virginia or the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, including the otherwise lawful possession, carrying, transportation, sale, or transfer of firearms except to the extent necessary to ensure public safety in any place or facility designated or used by the Governor, any political subdivision of the Commonwealth, or any other governmental entity as an emergency shelter or for the purpose of sheltering persons;


Virginia Citizens Defense LeagueAbout Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. (VCDL):
Virginia Citizens Defense League, Inc. (VCDL). VCDL is an all-volunteer, non-partisan grassroots organization dedicated to defending the human rights of all Virginians. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a fundamental human right.
For more information, visit: www.vcdl.org.

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Darwin would of approved of this! Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom Grumpy's hall of Shame

Obviously the man did not do his home work!

Trump Derangement Syndrome is REAL! Professor Shoots Himself in Protest of Trump

Evidence strongly suggests the loon professor intended on killing himself, taping a $100 bill on the school’s bathroom mirror which read, “for the janitor.” Apparently the aftermath of the shooting was to be so gory that he felt bad for the clean-up person. Alas, his firearm ability only managed a shot to his arm.
Before we get to the story I want to say that, sadly, Trump Derangement Syndrome is real, and the afflicted are a real danger. This guy brought an illegal gun into the school. There’s really no telling what he was capable of doing. It is time to take this disease seriously, and the first step is awareness.

At iOTW report we want to do our part and recognize an organization that is spreading the word about this mental disorder.

I believe it is a national security issue.
Be a good citizen and display the ribbon. Put it on your car. Put it on your mailbox. Wear it on your shirt. Send the ribbon to the people in your life that may be afflicted, signaling to them that you support them and are hoping they get the help they need.
Tell them that you don’t want them to be desperate, in a bathroom with a gun, because they might accidentally shoot a Trump supporter, and that wouldn’t be good.
Go HERE to get your stickers. Keep them in your wallet and hand them to people when they go into their spittle-flecked rants, inanely disparaging the best president this country has seen in decades.
(Full disclosure: This project has been initiated by an iOTWreport reader who wants to remain anonymous. We are happy to publicize this project for them and if you are a blogger, tweeter, facebooker, etc., we encourage you to do the same.)
Review Journal-
Mark J. Bird was charged last month with discharging a gun within a prohibited structure, carrying a concealed weapon without a permit and possessing a dangerous weapon on school property, court records show.
He was found bleeding from a self-inflicted gunshot wound to his arm about 8:15 a.m. on Aug. 28 outside a bathroom in the Charleston campus K building.
The sociology professor was hired Aug. 26, 1993, and was an emeritus faculty member at the time of the shooting, college spokesman Richard Lake said. Bird was not scheduled to teach any courses during the fall 2018 semester.
Bird was employed with the college as of Tuesday, although Lake said it was not clear what disciplinary actions, if any, would be taken against him.
A 911 call was made after several CSN employees and at least one student saw Bird stumble out of the bathroom, bleeding, before he collapsed, the report said.
None of the witnesses — who later told police they only recalled hearing “a loud noise” — initially knew that Bird was armed and had shot himself, according to the report.
One college employee told police that he held Bird’s hand to calm him down as others tried to stop the bleeding. While waiting for authorities to arrive, Bird said he had shot himself in protest of President Donald Trump, police noted in their report. The report did not elaborate.
ht/ js
________________________________     Having seen a few suicides in my life.
Here is a little bit of advice. Mind you I am not condoning this or saying that you should do this!
But the only really effective way to do this follow these simple rules
A. Be Sober as booze really effects your aim a lot!
B. Do it outside as it is a lot easier to clean up afterward. But I have to give Bonus points for leaving a Tip. That did show some class!
C. Use the right gun that you have some experience with!
D. I suggest using any caliber above size of the 44 caliber.
E. That and if possible use either hollow points or semi wad cutters. Since they seem to ricochet less and lessen the chances of taking out somebody else. As the bullet might otherwise hit somebody else by accident.
F. Place the gun under the jaw, then press up & toward the back of your throat.
G. Squeeze the trigger don’t jerk it or you might miss!
H. When you get to Hell as a Suicide. (Hey, it is a Mortal Sin in most religions!)  Don’t be a pussy because you belong here now for all eternity. So be a man and act like one!You idiot!
By the way, most of your friends and family are going to be really pissed off at you. Even if you do write the Suicide Note of all time.
Since most Folks hate Cowards & because most suicides are a cowardly acts of a very selfish & self centered jerk.
Grumpy – By the way this part is only a attempt at humor and in no way codons or encourages other to try & snuff them selves!
 

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Cops Hard Nosed Folks Both Good & Bad

Getting Rid of the Trash!

The next time some whining liberal tells you that capital punishment doesn’t prevent murder, feel free to quote this article (once you have done kicking them in the balls, that is):

In March, two men were convicted in Newcastle Crown Court of the murder of a 29-year-old mother of two, Quyen Ngoc Nguyen. In a pre-meditated crime of unimaginable depravity, Stephen Unwin and William McFall robbed, raped and bludgeoned this 5ft-tall nail bar manager.
They dumped her — possibly still alive — in her own car, which they then set alight. They posed for ghoulish selfies at the scene.
Both men were already convicted killers, released as a result of parole board hearings.
McFall, now 51, had been freed after serving 13 years for battering to death with a hammer an 86-year-old woman whose home he had burgled.
Unwin, ten years younger, had been released after serving 14 years of a ‘life sentence’ for stabbing to death a 73-year-old retired pharmacist in the course of a burglary — on Christmas Day, 1998. Unwin had sought to cover up his tracks by setting fire to his victim’s bungalow.
There is no parole board on earth which can know if someone is truly remorseful (pictured: Nick Hardwick, former Parole Board chair) +6
There is no parole board on earth which can know if someone is truly remorseful (pictured: Nick Hardwick, former Parole Board chair)
He was released in 2012, because the parole board had believed his claim to feel ‘deep remorse’.

Yeah, he was remorseful, all right.  It bears no reminding that had these two bastards (and the others in the article) been executed, their subsequent victims would still be alive.  Prevention at its finest.
Frankly, I think that the parole boards who freed these animals should also face the needle / chair / gallows.  This was a basic precept of Hammurabic Law, and I for one regret its passing, in this respect at least.
Remember too that our Liberal Class want us to be more like Europe or Britain, and the modern-day “democratic socialists” have included the abolition of the prison system in their election manifesto.
Communistatis delenda est.
***From Splendid Isolation

Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom

Firearms: The Great Equalizer

Fifty-five years ago today, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech in front of the Lincoln Memorial in our nation’s capital.
While Dr. King’s speech is well-known, what is not so widely recognized are his views on firearms.
People who visited Dr. King’s home described it as an arsenal. One journalist came to his house and later reported that while sitting down in an armchair, he almost landed right on a handgun.

Not only that, after Dr. King’s home was bombed, he applied for a concealed carry permit in Alabama in 1956. But he was denied.
All of this just underscores the dangers of gun control. It turns our rights into privileges, allowing prejudiced officials to revoke the rights of decent people at will.
We see this in the Black Codes which either prevented or discouraged the ability of African-Americans to protect themselves with firearms.
This, of course, made them easy prey for the lynch mobs.
One African-American journalist, Ida Wells, documented many of the lynchings that took place in the 19th Century.
But she also noted that the only time blacks actually escaped the lynch mobs was when they “had a gun and used it in self-defense.”
Click here to see more GOA News articles like this one.
This is why the Second Amendment is so important. It not only safeguards our right to defend ourselves against thugs, it protects that right when the thugs are wearing badges.
The best-known example of this in American history is the colonists’ spirited defense against the British attempt to confiscate weapons and powder at Concord, Massachusetts, on April 19, 1775.
But this was not the last time that armed civilians would use their weapons to protect themselves against corrupt officials.
In 1906, a white mob worked itself up into a frenzy and started a race riot in Georgia. Over a thousand men walked through the streets of Atlanta, indiscriminately beating black men and women, black teenagers, and black businessmen.
The scene was gruesome. The best estimates record that dozens of blacks were murdered. Hundreds were wounded.
The rioters spilled from one area of Atlanta into another, until they reached one neighborhood, known as “Darktown,” where African-Americans were armed and shot back. That’s where the riot was stopped in its tracks.
Armed blacks forced the mob to retreat and they prevented a second bloodbath.
All this happened on a Saturday night. The riots were paused because of the armed response, but then they resumed again on Monday.
Only this time, to make matters worse, state law enforcement officers went into south Atlanta and tried to disarm the blacks.
One of the preeminent historians who has covered the 1906 riots, John Dittmer, had this to say about what happened next:
[The lead officer] James Heard, was shot out of his saddle and died instantly. Three other officers … were wounded in the initial exchange before the outgunned troops fled, leaving Heard’s body behind. (John Dittmer, Black Georgia in the Progressive Era (1900-1920), p. 128).
Once again, the riot was abruptly stopped.
In his 1963 speech, Dr. King spoke of the Declaration of Independence as the great promissory note which guaranteed the unalienable rights of ALL people.
This right of self-protection is the freedom which protects all our other rights against official abuse. We’ve seen this in practice time and again.
Former Secretary of State to George Bush, Condoleezza Rice, tells the story of how her dad would take his shotgun — and with other armed African Americans in the neighborhood — would form nightly patrols to protect the town’s people from the KKK.
This was common during the difficult days of the civil rights movement. African Americans would use their firearms to protect themselves against the KKK when the Southern Democrat police departments were looking the other way.
So therein lies the rub — government agents don’t always act in the best interests of its citizens.
And that’s why there is a Second Amendment — a guarantee which protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms without infringement.
Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Grumpy's hall of Shame

Know your Enemies ! (Now they have a right to their opinion, but I don't think that I am going to send them any of my hard earned cash real soon!)

Levi Strauss Forms Gun-Control Group with Bloomberg, Pushes Employees to Donate

Clothing company plans to spend millions advocating new gun-control laws

Levi Strauss CEO Chip Bergh / Getty Images

BY: 
Levi Strauss announced on Tuesday it would be creating a new gun-control group with billionaire Michael Bloomberg and donating millions of dollars to a collection of established gun-control groups.
The clothing company said it would be partnering with Everytown for Gun Safety and Michael Bloomberg to form Everytown Business Leaders for Gun Safety in a blogpost on their website.
It also said it would set up the Safer Tomorrow Fund, which Levi Strauss said would direct more than $1 million over the next four years to “fuel the work of nonprofits and youth activists who are working to end gun violence in America.”
The company went on to say it would begin doubling the amount it matches for employee donations to gun-control groups aligned with the fund and pushed employees to use their five hours a month in paid volunteer time at the gun-control groups.
Levi Strauss said while they had already requested customers not carry firearms in their store in 2016 and had supported gun-control initiatives in the past, they felt they needed to become more politically involved in the issue.
“We have a gun violence epidemic in America, and companies like ours—that operate in American communities—can no longer watch from the sidelines,” a Levi Strauss spokesperson told the Washington Free Beacon. “Although LS&Co. has taken some action to support gun-violence prevention over the last two decades, we believe there is a bigger role that business can play in affecting real change.
Through our newly established Safer Tomorrow Fund and involvement in the Everytown Business Leaders for Gun Safety coalition, we hope to catalyze others to join us and be part of stemming gun violence in this country.”
The company did not respond to questions about what specific gun-control laws it hopes to enact through its activism.
Levi Strauss announced the first grants from the Safer Tomorrow Fund would be going to three established groups that have advocated for myriad gun-control laws.
Everytown for Gun Safety, Live Free, and Giffords will be the first grant recipients under the company’s new plan. Those groups have supported expanding background checks to used-gun sales between private individuals, banning so-called assault weapons, and outlawing the possession of gun blueprints.
The company said the grant to Everytown would be used to support “a series of Youth Leadership Summits organized by volunteers from Students Demand Action.”
It said the grant to Live Free would go toward training “youth impacted by gun violence on successful gun-violence reduction strategies,” and the Levi Strauss Foundation would fund “a series of town halls in cities across the U.S. that are disproportionately impacted by gun violence.” The grant to Gifford’s will be used to “support business community engagement and education on the issue of gun-violence prevention.”
Chip Bergh, Levi Strauss president and CEO, justified the decision to become more deeply involved with the gun-control groups by saying it may be unpopular but he felt compelled to do it.
“We can’t take on every issue,” Bergh said in an op-ed. “But as business leaders with power in the public and political arenas, we simply cannot stand by silently when it comes to the issues that threaten the very fabric of the communities where we live and work. While taking a stand can be unpopular with some, doing nothing is no longer an option.”
Bergh went on to say he doesn’t “suggest we repeal the Second Amendment or to suggest that gun owners aren’t responsible,” but there are some weapons nobody should be allowed to own and that some people shouldn’t be allowed to own any weapons.
He did not elaborate on which guns he wants banned or which people should be banned from owning guns. Bergh did express support for “criminal background checks on all gun sales” as a “common-sense” step that “will save lives.”
Bergh then compared those who oppose the company’s gun-control stance to segregationists and those opposed to other moves the company has made.
“As a company, we have never been afraid to take an unpopular stand to support a greater good,” Bergh said. “We integrated our factories in the American South years before the Civil Rights Act was passed.
We offered benefits to same-sex partners in the 1990s, long before most companies did. We pulled our financial support for the Boy Scouts of America when it banned gay troop leaders.
While each one of these stands may have been controversial at the time, history proved the company right in the long run. And I’m convinced that while some will disagree with our stand to end gun violence, history will prove this position right too.”

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

maybe, maybe not but it is up to them to figure that one out!

Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

From the NRA – In Wake of Jacksonville Shooting, “News” Outlet Recycles Article Calling for Firearm Confiscation

In Wake of Jacksonville Shooting, “News” Outlet Recycles Article Calling for Firearm Confiscation
It’s sometimes said that insanity can be defined as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
If that’s true, it doesn’t speak well of gun control advocates’ mental health, insofar as they repeat the same ritual after every high-profile firearm-related crime, with little or no lasting impact on public opinion or national policy.
Their standard procedure is: immediately misreport basic facts of the incident; unleash the indignation of anti gun politicians and celebrities on social media;
condemn the NRA and anyone else who offers thoughts and prayers while awaiting reliable information;
demand the same types of gun controls that failed to prevent the incident; insist that the gun debate has reached a turning point;
and abruptly stop talking about the incident when emotions cool and facts emerge that show how existing gun controls failed.
The defining tactic in this whole chain of events is to seize and define the narrative in the immediate aftermath of the event before anybody actually knows what happened.
The website Vox.com, however, took this tendency to new depths by using a double-murder/suicide that took place at a video game competition in Jacksonville, Florida, to re-run nearly word-for-word an article the outlet had published in May after a firearm-related crime in Sante Fe, Texas.
In both cases, the author used his limited propaganda window to express opinions that gun control advocates usually shun in the calm, cold light of reasoned debate.
“What America likely needs,” he wrote, “is something … like Australia’s mandatory buyback program — essentially, a gun confiscation scheme — paired with a serious ban on specific firearms (including, potentially, all semiautomatic weapons).”
Yet if it’s crazy for gun control advocates to expect different results from doing the same thing, it’s equally crazy for Second Amendment supporters to ignore what the opposition says when they believe they have the leeway to really speak their mind.
Simply put, when someone tells you he wants to take your guns, the only safe bet is to take him at his word.
This is the reality of the gun control agenda: its adherents see guns as the problem and the absence of guns as the solution. Everything they do is geared toward the goal of reducing and eventually eliminating civilian firearm ownership.
The only variable is the speed at which they’re willing to accomplish this objective. Sometimes they’re willing to do it by attrition, with an eye toward the gradual tapering off of new gun owners.
But the temptation to extol mass firearm confiscation is one many simply cannot resist when their outrage is in full bloom.
To be fair, the Vox author admitted that his plan is not viable in the short term and that “[p]art of the holdup is the Second Amendment.” He was quick to endorse whatever “milder” gun control the U.S. will tolerate in the meantime, while it works up the will “to take the action it really needs.”
But again, let’s not kid ourselves about what this “milder” gun control really accomplishes.
It’s certainly not public safety, a fact illustrated by the Jacksonville incident itself. According to media accounts, the alleged perpetrator bought the pistol he used in his crime in Maryland, which has one of the nation’s strictest gun control regimes.
He then reportedly used that pistol to commit a multiple-murder/suicide in a state known for a more lenient approach to gun control. The scene of the crime was also a gun-free zone.
And while the media is indulging in its usual obsession about what “should have” stopped him from buying gun, the alleged perpetrator cleared every “evidence-based polic[y]” the Vox author suggested might at least lead to “reduced injuries and deaths.”
This includes Maryland’s licensing and background check requirements, its expansive mental health disqualifiers for firearm ownership, and even its “assault weapons” and “large capacity” magazine bans.
This was “state of the art” gun control in 2013. It was Maryland’s “solution” to “preventing” something like what happened the year before in Newtown, Connecticut.
And now that it has failed so publicly, the Maryland legislature is said to be considering – you guessed it – even more restrictive gun control.
Because, ultimately, the only thing that gun control accomplishes is conditioning the public to accept ever more gun control under the false premise that we’re somehow just a few laws short of overcoming the problem of human evil.
Come to think of it, that’s a pretty good definition of insanity, as well.

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Grumpy's hall of Shame

David Hogg Threatens to ‘Destroy’ Smith & Wesson If It Doesn’t Donate $5M to Gun Control Research by S.H. BLANNELBERRY

David Hogg, the posterboy for the modern gun control movement. (Photo: Facebook)

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
While participating in an anti-gun march in Massachusetts over the weekend, gun-control crusader David Hogg posted a hair-raising and head-turning ultimatum to Smith & Wesson.
Hogg told the popular firearms and ammunition manufacturer, headquartered in Springfield, via Twitter, that it had to fund “gun violence prevention research” to the tune of $5 million annually and cease making certain black rifles or else…
Hogg and his posse of moonbat millennials would “destroy” S&W.
“We will destroy you by using the two things you fear most,” wrote Hogg.  “Love and economics 🙂 see you soon.”

David Hogg

@davidhogg111

Dear, Smith and Wesson should you not choose to be morally responsible by

1. By funding gun violence prevention research with 5 million dollars annually.
&
2. Stop manufacturing guns that are illegal under the 2004 Massachusetts assault weapons ban

David Hogg

@davidhogg111

We will destroy you by using the two things you fear most.

Love and economics 🙂 see you soon.

It didn’t take very long for folks on Twitter to point out the obvious flaw with Hogg’s plan.  For a boycott to be effective, the protesters must be active consumers of a company’s products.

David Hogg

@davidhogg111

We will destroy you by using the two things you fear most.

Love and economics 🙂 see you soon.

Amy Swearer@AmySwearer

You’re going to destroy Smith and Wesson by not buying their products, which you already don’t buy?

You really don’t know how economics or love work, do you?

What a joke!  Hogg stands about as much of a chance of shutting down S&W as PETA does McDonald’s.

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic!

Just another hasty "We gotta do something / Feel good Politics (Poor Rhode Island Responsible Gun Owners!)

Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo with school commissioner Ken Wagner.  (Photo: Fox RI)

The ruling class in Rhode Island this week banned guns in public schools with the exception of law enforcement.
Gov. Gina Raimondo made the announcement Wednesday alongside school commissioner Ken Wagner.
“It isn’t hard: Guns don’t belong in schools. Even Mississippi bans non-law enforcement officials from carrying guns onto school grounds,” said Raimondo in a press release.
Quick fact check. Raimondo’s wrong.  Mississippi does allow individuals with enhanced concealed carry permits to bring firearms onto public school property.
“As we start a new school year, our students cannot wait a minute longer for the General Assembly to take action on the Safe Schools Act,” she continued. “The Rhode Island Department of Education has issued a binding directive to every school district that immediately bans firearms from our kids’ schools.”
In other words, instead of allowing government to function the way it’s supposed to, with lawmakers making the laws, Raimondo enacted an order by executive fiat.

Gina Raimondo

@GovRaimondo

Guns don’t belong in schools.

This directive comes in response to uncertainty among education leaders and members of the community, and a lack of consistent practice across district lines.

RIDeptEd@RIDeptEd

Effective immediately, until such time as the underlying laws are clarified, no one other than active law enforcement is allowed to carry a firearm on school grounds.

Wagner backed up that play by suggesting there was some sort of confusion about the existing law.
“It’s our job to protect kids and their teachers,” said Wagner. “Inconsistencies among laws, regulations, and local policies and practices create confusion, producing the exact kind of unsafe environment the law is intended to prevent. As we start a new school year, this directive provides clarity, until such time that the underlying laws are reconciled.”
There was no confusion about the law. Concealed carriers were allowed to bring firearms into public schools. Plain and simple. Raimondo and Wagner just wanted to put a stop to that. The question is why? Because if it’s really about protecting kids and teachers then they have it all wrong. They should ban cops before they ban concealed carriers. Seriously.
Research shows that when compared to cops, concealed carriers commit fewer homicides, firearms violations, misdemeanor and felony offenses.  Concealed carries are more law-abiding than cops and are convicted at a lower rate. The question can be asked, then, who presents more of a threat to “the children”? The average cop or the average concealed carry?
Please, I’m not suggesting that law enforcement and armed student resource officers don’t belong in schools. Just pointing out that this assumption by government that all cops are White Knights has real limitations. When you break it down the truth is that Raimondo and Wagner aren’t against guns in schools, they’re just against armed citizens having guns in schools. And based on data and what we know about concealed-carry culture that position doesn’t hold water, especially if one accepts that armed resistance is the best way to foil a would-be killer.  What they need to recognize is that cops are not the only good guys with guns, they’re not the only ones willing and capable of confronting an armed attacker.
Suppose a young Rhode Island mother has a concealed carry permit because her crazy ex physically abused her and her son. When she goes to pick up her son from school, that crazy ex now knows that she is unarmed. She is vulnerable. What’s stopping him from attacking her in the parking lot?  The cop that’s way inside the building?  As they say, when seconds count…
Anyways, what’s not clear, at least at this point, is the penalty for those concealed carriers caught violating Raimondo’s order. I reached out to her office for clarification. We’ll see if she responds.

*

Categories
Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Grumpy's hall of Shame

Get the feeling that some Folks did not like the Old Boy?