Categories
All About Guns

Now that would settle the hash of most creatures in the lower 48

Categories
EVIL MF HUH!

From the Fine Blog – Bayou Renaissance Man

Things are getting interesting in narco-Mexico…

According to a report in the Atlantic (paywalled, but an archived version is here), the politicians in Mexico who have for years – probably for generations – been bribed and/or cajoled and/or threatened by the drug cartels into turning a blind eye to their criminal activities, appear to be changing their tune.

(BIAS WARNING:  The Atlantic is notoriously anti-President Trump and routinely criticizes the policies and actions of his administration.  This article appears to be unusually positive, despite that reservation.)

 

… the governor of the strategically important border state of Baja California was just caught on tape offering to become an FBI informant. The remarkable thing here is that she would not be the first; the list of current and former Mexican officials and drug traffickers who have offered to cooperate with the U.S. government is now lengthy.

. . .

Since his second term began, Trump has periodically threatened military action inside Mexico, alluding to air strikes or operations that would “take out the cartels.” Mexican officials have repeatedly rejected the possibility. “There will be no invasion of Mexico,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said last year. But quietly, Mexican officials have discussed what it would mean if they were attacked by their neighbor and largest trading partner. Would it be a special-forces operation, like the one that seized former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro? A drone strike on a fentanyl lab? Some Mexican officials are reading books about the Mexican-American War, searching for historical precedent.

Because the threat of military intervention is so dramatic, not enough attention has been paid to a type of intervention that is already taking place, one that could pave the way for strikes.

 

In a break with long-standing precedent, American prosecutors have used informants to pursue members of the Mexican government, apparently “moving up the food chain,” as one U.S. official described it to me … Several former Mexican officials facing U.S. charges have turned themselves in, apparently agreeing to cooperate with authorities to reduce their sentences.

 

Dozens of newly extradited drug traffickers, too, are believed to be cooperating. Their accounts appear to have allowed U.S. investigators to build cases against members of Sheinbaum’s Morena political party. At least four have been indicted. Many more have had their visas revoked.

 

It’s a high-risk escalation in the Trump administration’s fight against narco corruption—and possibly also a pretext for a unilateral attack. Trump could use evidence of the government’s links to organized crime in an attempt to justify using force in Mexico. This week, the Trump-appointed head of the Drug Enforcement Administration, Terry Cole, gave a speech describing “the deadly connection between cartel networks and the Mexican government.”

“They are one [and] the same,” he said.

. . .

Last week, the State Department designated two lesser-known drug cartels—the Juárez Cartel and Los Viagras—as “foreign terrorist ⁠organizations” and “specially designated global terrorists.” Some within the Trump administration believe that those designations would offer some kind of legal authority for an attack, though international-law experts largely differ … The campaign against cartel leaders has been so successful that, even if the United States wanted to decapitate a drug-trafficking organization, it’s unclear whom they would target.

 

There’s more at the link.

This has mostly been taking place “under the wire”, so to speak.  We’ve known for years that the entire government structure of Mexico – local, regional and national – is corrupted by drug money from the cartels, who effectively run most of the country.

However, if the cartel leaders, and political leaders, are rendered ineffective (or imprisoned), what’s going to happen to the social fabric of Mexico?  So much of it is cartel-corrupted (including almost every element of the police and armed forces, the emergency services, etc.) that ordinary citizens have learned to live without most of the social structure we take for granted.

If the replacement structures of the cartel are suddenly removed, will Mexico survive in its present form?

I think there are three possibilities.

  1. Mexico will collapse into a “failed state”, with widespread chaos and anarchy.  It will be almost impossible for business to function without paying massive bribes to local strongmen, but those strongmen will be at war with each other, so that an effective regional or national government simply won’t be possible.
  2. Mexico will limp along as it does at present.  The cartel structures will continue to use their financial wealth (very considerable, having amassed it over decades) to buy the cooperation of the civil authorities.  However, the competition between cartels to take over those resources will devolve into civil war in parts of the country, and will likely spill over into the southern United States.                                                                                                                                                                                      I’d expect southern California, Arizona and New Mexico to become very dangerous areas, even more so than at present.  (I daresay Texas will probably cope better than they do, because Texas law enforcement authorities aren’t handcuffed by liberal politicians who’ll do everything in their power to restrict them.)
  3. Mexico may break into several smaller nation-states, based on divisions that go back centuries.  Don’t forget, “modern” Mexico was “created” out of a series of revolutions and civil wars that imposed unity out of the barrel of a gun, and killed anyone who argued with the concept.  With the number of guns in circulation there now, it’ll be harder to impose authority in that way.
I could be completely wrong, of course.  Time will tell . . .

 

Peter

Categories
Fieldcraft

Does this Reflective spray really work?

Categories
All About Guns

The Webley ‘Kaufmann’ Improved Government Revolver with firearms expert Jonathan Ferguson.

Categories
All About Guns Grumpy's hall of Shame Paint me surprised by this Some Sick Puppies! that’s too bad” You have to be kidding, right!?!

The atrocity of the year! A SCCY CPX2 in 9mm

Categories
War You have to be kidding, right!?!

Tiny M8 Greyhound Kills Massive King Tiger Tank – The Impossible Defense of St. Vith

Categories
Soldiering

Why Were Army Officers of the 17th Century So Fashionable?

Categories
All About Guns Allies War

The Bren: The Machine Gun British Soldiers Trusted With Their Lives

Categories
This great Nation & Its People War

They Were Born in the North. So Why Did They Fight for the South? | U.S. Civil War

Categories
All About Guns Darwin would of approved of this! Fieldcraft You have to be kidding, right!?!

Handgun Proficiency: Could You Have Out-Shot Wild Bill? by Richard A. Mann

Handgun Proficiency: Could You Have Out-Shot Wild Bill?

If you could go back and duel Wild Bill Hickock, are your handgun skills good enough that you would walk away alive?

Legend has it that Wild Bill Hickock was a “very good” pistol shot, but what does that mean, exactly? I don’t think we will ever know, but legend also tells us that during a gunfight with Davis Tutt in Springfield, Missouri, in 1865, Wild Bill shot Tutt through the heart at 75 yards with either a 0.36-caliber Navy Colt or a 0.44-caliber Colt’s Dragoon. The gun he used is not that important, but most anyone would agree hitting a target smaller than a soft ball at that distance with a cap and ball revolver would require some fine marksmanship. Of course, we have no idea what Wild Bill was aiming at (maybe he was aiming at Tutt’s head?).

We of course lack evidence—provenanced evidence—but we do have a story from the October 1937 issue of the American Mercury magazine. The following quote is from the article, “The Myth of the Two-Gun Man,” written by Charles B. Roth:

“The best Marksman of the Old West was a mild little soldier you have probably never met in your readings for the good reason he doesn’t appear there. He was too busy with his job to talk to newspaper correspondents. But the annals of Nebraska history write him large.

Major Frank North was his name, and he was commanding officer of the Pawnee Scouts, a body of Indian soldiers that served during the Indian campaigns. His brother, Luther North, was associated with him. Often I have queried Luther North about frontier marksmanship.”

“Did you ever see Wild Bill Hickock shoot?”

“Many times.”

“Was he pretty good?”

“Yes. But Frank [Frank North] was better. Even Bill said so.”

“Just how well could they shoot?”

“About as well as anyone, with the guns they had. They both could live up to the test of good marksmanship. Frank better than Bill. You put an envelope 10 paces away, and if you could keep all six shots in the envelope you were counted good. One of the shots had to be in the stamp, which was pasted on the back of the envelope in the center.”

“How big were the envelopes?”

“Five inches square. And the stamp an inch square.”

Handgun Proficiency Old Wests Shootists Challenge SAA
This Old West Challenge is still a great drill for precision practice with your strong hand only.

The article goes on to say that Luther never witnessed Frank fail to out-shoot Hickock, who always took the losses good-naturedly. But according to Luther, Wild Bill once said, “Frank, you can sure beat me when it comes to shootin’ at these little black dots, but I can beat you when it comes to hitting men.” The author goes on to theorize that it was nerve more than marksmanship that kept men like Hickock, Jesse James and Bat Masterson alive.

Measuring Handgun Marksmanship

The reason I share this article is that the practice of shooting a 5-inch square with a 1-inch hidden square on the middle of the backside of the target has evolved into what is known as the Old West’s Shootist’s Challenge. You place that target at 25 feet and shoot with your strong hand only with no time limit. The goal is to get all six shots inside the 5-inch square, and one must hit the 1-inch square—stamp—on the back side.

default
The Old West Challenge is intended to be shot strong-hand only, the same way a lot of the shooting back in the day was done.

This is not a terribly difficult test, and it’s a drill I do on occasion to make me focus on accuracy more than speed. After all, you cannot miss fast enough to win a gunfight. I emailed the challenge to another Bill—Bill Wilson of Wilson Combat—and less than 30 minutes later he sent me back a photo of his target shot with one of his 4-inch 1911 compact pistols. All six shots were in the 5-inch square—envelope—and four hit the 1-inch square. Of course, Hickock never saw a Wilson Combat 1911, and Wilson is a fantastic pistol shot. A little humbled, I didn’t bother to send Wilson a photo of the target I shot with my Single Action Army revolver with all five shots in the square but only one in the stamp.

In another blast from the past, I have in my archives a photograph of a playing card shot in 1894 by William G. Baldwin, who was the founder of the Baldwin Felts Detective Agency. It shows 10 hits from 52 feet—17.3 yards—with a S&W revolver, and the note says, “When I was a shootist.”

Handgun Proficiency Old Wests Shootists Challenge
The playing card challenge at 17 yards—shooting both hands—is a great precision practice drill. Shooting with the strong hand only, it’s a supreme test of marksmanship.

Baldwin survived multiple gunfights during his career, put numerous bad guys in the ground, and died of old age in 1936. However, we have no way of knowing the conditions in which he fired those 10 shots. At that time, shooting with the strong hand only was common practice, but did Baldwin use one hand or two?

Either way, it was good shooting; try it.

We will never know the factual truth regarding the marksmanship abilities of those legendary gunfighters, but maybe the most poignant evidence of their skill is that they survived the gunfights they were in. Well, mostly. Wild Bill was playing poker in Deadwood on August 2, 1876, when Jack McCall shot him in the back of the head with a Colt Single Action Army chambered in .45 Long Colt. I suppose McCall lacked the courage, or, just as likely, he had enough sense not to face Wild Bill and try to kill him. Regardless, situational awareness might be as much if not more important than marksmanship skill. I imagine if we could dig him up from his South Dakota grave and ask him, Wild Bill would probably agree.