Categories
All About Guns COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HUH!

Winchester Just Dropped a $100 CO2 Western Revolver – How Many You Buying?

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

Sorry folks but these are some mighty strange looking pistols to me!

Categories
All About Guns This great Nation & Its People War

This just screams America to me!

Categories
All About Guns

History of the Trapdoor Rifle By Cory Ross

My passion has been collecting and acquiring representative United States Service rifles. That includes items like the 1898 Krag-Jorgensen, 1903 Springfield (and its variants), the M1 Garand and the M1 Carbine.

However, one of my favorites in that collection is the Springfield Model 1884 Trapdoor Rifle. Why? Because it’s such a strange gun! It’s a rifle of two eras — muzzleloading and breechloading. It’s such an oddity in the development of military arms.

demonstrating how to reload a trapdoor rifle
According to the author, the manual of arms for the Trapdoor rifle is simpler than it may seem. Here, he is demonstrating how to reload it.

While Europe was developing all-new weapon systems around the idea of a self-contained cartridge, the United States decided to mash the concept together. This was all in an effort to save money in a post-bellum world. And that’s what makes this bit of firearms history so interesting.

Allin’s Alterations

Before I begin, yes, both sides of the Civil War produced models of breech-loading rifles. Just not on a large scale. Civil War-era breech-loading carbines, like the Spencer and Sharps, were issued to some cavalry units but served mainly as a temporary solution and did little to arm the infantry. After the war, a solution was needed to modernize the army — within certain limits.

trapdoor rifle with 45-70 Government ammunition
There’s nothing like owning — and shooting — a 140-year-old rifle that is rich in American history.

Erskine S. Allin, the chief armorer at Springfield Armory in Massachusetts, faced the challenge of converting the Army’s large reserve of .58-caliber muzzle-loading percussion muskets into breechloaders.

This effort led to the creation of the Model 1865 Springfield, popularly called “Allin’s Alteration.” Although the Civil War demonstrated the superiority of breechloading rifles, postwar budget cuts drastically limited funding, preventing the purchase of new weapons as tens of thousands of usable muskets — some never issued — were in storage.

range markings to 1400 yards
The target rear sight on this rifle has range markings to 1,400 yards. For a standard infantry rifle, accurate shooting at that range might seem implausible.

To solve this problem, Allin devised an innovative conversion system. He milled away part of the top rear of the barrel and installed a hinged breechblock equipped with a firing pin and extractor-ejector mechanism, transforming outdated muzzleloaders into practical breechloaders.

Similar hinged breechblock mechanisms had been made by both foreign and domestic gunmakers with varying success. Although other gunmakers had attempted similar hinged-breech designs, Allin’s approach proved successful. The resulting Model 1865 Springfield was widely nicknamed the “Trapdoor Springfield.”

Early Models: 1865, 1866, 1868 & 1870

The early models weren’t as refined as later versions, but they are important to the Trapdoor’s development. The first pattern, the Model 1865, or the “Allin Conversion,” saw 5,000 units produced. These took the Model 1861 .58-cal. rifle muskets and converted them to breech loaders using Allin’s design. The guns kept their original 40” barrels and were chambered for a .58-cal. rimfire metallic cartridge, but were otherwise mostly unchanged from the original Civil War muzzleloaders.

But, like many first-generation models, there were challenges. The breechblock mechanism and rimfire cartridge of the Model 1865 proved to be less than ideal, so the Model 1866, sometimes called the “Second Allin Conversion,” was developed and adopted. The new version kept the original 40” barrel but reamed it out and brazed a .50-cal. sleeve in place to accommodate a new cartridge.

author prepares to shoot the trapdoor rifle
The author prepares to shoot his Trapdoor rifle. Shooting classic firearms helps to bring history alive.

The complicated “First Allin” breechblock was replaced with a simpler, stronger breechblock assembly. Additionally, a significantly improved .50-caliber centerfire cartridge, the .50-70 Government (or, as I like to call it, the “Big Fifty”), was developed for the new design. This marked a major step toward what we now recognize as the “Trapdoor.”

The Model 1868 replaced the Model 1866. It used the same .50-70 Gov’t cartridge but had a new receiver. It also featured the same .50-cal. sleeved barrel, but it was shortened to 32½”. This made the rifle much more handy. While a longer barrel improved accuracy and ensured that all the powder burned, it was also bulky.

The final version of the .50-70 Gov’t Trapdoor Springfield was the Model 1870. While it closely resembled the earlier .50-70 Model 1868, it incorporated several refinements, such as a shorter receiver and a newly manufactured 32½” .50-cal. barrel. Unlike earlier conversions that involved modifying Civil War–era muskets, the Model 1870 was built with new major components rather than repurposed ones.

In many ways, it marked the culmination of earlier conversion efforts and signaled a shift toward a purpose-built breechloading service rifle.

The 1873 & 45-70 Gov’t

The Model 1870 rifle and carbine proved to be improvements over the previous Trapdoor Springfield models, but the .50-70 Gov’t cartridge was found to be less than ideal. A trial was held in 1872 to decide which rifle and carbine would be standardized for the U.S. Army’s infantry and cavalry units.

top down look at the breech of the trapdoor rifle
The author states that the “Allin Conversion” is what makes the trapdoor breechblock service rifle unique.

In 1873, slightly modified versions of the Model 1870 rifle and carbine, chambered for the newly developed .45-70 Gov’t cartridge, which was ballistically superior to the .50-70 Gov’t, were approved for adoption. The .45-70 Gov’t cartridge was loaded with 70 grains of black powder and a 405-grain lead bullet. A cartridge for the carbine was also developed that used the same 405-grain bullet, but contained only 55 grains of powder to reduce recoil (how thoughtful).

While 1873 marked a significant improvement in performance, another round of upgrades occurred in 1877. The stock, with the new .45-70 Gov’t cartridge, was prone to breaking. To address this, it was redesigned with a thicker wrist for added durability. Additionally, a recess for a three-piece, jointed cleaning rod was carved into the buttstock to hold it and other tools; this could be accessed through a buttplate with a hinged door. The updated version was called the “Model 1877,” but the breechblocks still bore the “1873” marking.

The Final Trapdoor

In 1884, the Model 1884 “Buffington” rear sight was designed for use with the Trapdoor Springfield rifle, carbine, and Cadet Rifle. Unlike earlier rear sights that were only adjustable for elevation, this new sight was fully adjustable for windage as well. Apart from that, no significant changes were made. The new version was designated the “Model 1884,” and the breechblock markings were updated accordingly. About 20,003 Model 1884 carbines were produced, along with 148,796 rifles and 13,500 Cadet Rifles. Production ended in 1893.

Trapdoor Ammunition

While learning the history of the Trapdoor is one thing, actually owning and shooting one is a completely different experience. Before discussing what it’s like to shoot a Trapdoor, however, it’s important to briefly discuss ammunition.

45-70 reloading components
The author uses these .45-70 reloading components when working up his own loads.

The Trapdoor rifle was designed, built, and issued during the black powder era, a distinction that is quite significant. The easiest way to understand the difference is to think of black powder as an explosive, while smokeless powder acts more like a propellant. Because of this fundamental difference, the two types of powder behave very differently in terms of burn rate, pressure levels, and overall performance inside a firearm.

Things become even more complicated when looking at the .45-70 Government cartridge. This round, now over a century and a half old, remarkably continues to survive in the modern era. In fact, it ranks among the oldest metallic cartridges still in continuous production, with new rifles manufactured and chambered for it today (its popularity coincides with the rise of “tactical” lever-action rifles and the adoption of straight-wall cartridges in previous “shotgun-only” states for deer hunting).

At first glance, this might seem like good news for shooters, since it means a wide variety of .45-70 ammunition is readily available. However, the reality is more complex, and some caution is needed when selecting ammunition for older rifles.

three different ammunition loads for the trapdoor rifle
The author shows three different “Trapdoor safe” current loads manufactured by the Steinel Ammunition Company.

A good illustration of this appears in my Hornady Handbook of Cartridge Reloading, Vol. 11. In it, .45-70 load data is divided into three separate rifle categories: Trapdoor, Marlin 1895, and Ruger No. 1. In addition to those, there is also a section covering handgun ammunition for the T/C line of single-shot pistols. The reason for this separation is that the .45-70 Government cartridge offers exceptional versatility for shooters and hunters alike.

That flexibility becomes even more pronounced for reloaders, who can tailor loads using a wide variety of bullet weights and powder charges depending on the intended purpose, whether it be historical shooting, hunting, or modern high-performance applications. That said, modern .45-70 loads are not suitable for historic .45-70 rifles like the Trapdoor.

Steinel Ammunition for the trapdoor rifle
Shown with the factory packaging, these Steinel Ammunition .45-70 Government loads are tailor-made for the Trapdoor rifle.

Fortunately, there are companies that produce historically appropriate ammunition for collectors and enthusiasts who shoot vintage firearms. In a recent article, I discussed Steinel Ammunition, a company that specializes in exactly this.

Steinel offers several .45-70 loads specifically designed for Trapdoor rifles. Among these is a 405-grain RNFP load that averages around 1,300 fps, depending on barrel length. They also offer a 500-grain RN load that runs at approximately 1,320 fps. These cartridges use Starline brass and cast projectiles, and they are intentionally loaded to remain within safe pressure levels for Trapdoor rifles.

As a reloader myself, I have developed a similar load using a 405-grain cast bullet, Starline brass, and Trail Boss powder — although that powder has unfortunately become difficult to find in recent years. All this to say, when shooting a historic rifle like the Trapdoor, make sure you are using “Trapdoor-safe” ammunition.

Shooting a Trapdoor Today

Shooting a historical rifle truly brings history to life. That’s the joy of collecting historical firearms. When shooting the Trapdoor, history feels tangible. There’s a romanticized view that harkens back to the late 1800’s and the Wild West — a different era when things were done with purpose.

author shooting trapdoor rifle
The author finds that recoil is mild with low-pressure loads. He describes it as more of a push than a kick.

That’s the best way to describe shooting my Model 1884 Trapdoor. It transports me to a different time. While I don’t shoot it very often, I do shoot it. Before it was history, it was a tool and a battle implement. Shooting this rifle is a connection to that past.

Conclusion

The Trapdoor Springfield was manufactured from 1865 (Alin Conversion) to 1893 (Model 1884) before being replaced by the repeating bolt-action Model 1892 Krag-Jørgensen, which entered production at the Massachusetts-based Springfield Armory in 1894 and was chambered for the smokeless .30-40 Krag cartridge. Its service life marked the end of the U.S. Army’s black powder era and the beginning of a new age of modern military firearms.

Yet the Trapdoor remains a fascinating bridge between two periods of technological change. It reflects a nation balancing innovation with practicality in the years following the Civil War. Today, whether studied as a historical artifact or fired on the range, the Trapdoor continues to tell the story of that transition.

Categories
All About Guns

My New Snubbie is Great!

Categories
All About Guns

577 t rex

Categories
This great Nation & Its People

Could You Live Below Deck On An Aircraft Carrier Like Sailors Do?

Categories
All About Guns

Smith & Wesson Frame Sizes and Comparison

Categories
All About Guns

A Remington Model 721 in .30-06 Sprg

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

Ayoob: Is the 1911 Wrong for CCW? By Massad Ayoob

There are reasons why the full-size 1911 pistol is often described as “iconic,” and the gun’s long and successful history on battlefields, in the streets and at pistol championships isn’t the only reason. It’s slim for its power level, an important dimension for both comfort and concealment. When properly built, it’s also remarkably accurate, and its trigger system and grip shape adapt well to a broad range of hand sizes.

The 1911 is not seen as often in holsters as polymer-framed, striker-fired pistols. Why is that?
The 1911 is not seen as often in holsters as polymer-framed, striker-fired pistols. Why is that?

But you do not see it as often in holsters as you do striker-fired, polymer-framed pistols. Why is that? Is there something about the pistol that made it good for combat on the battlefield, but poor for civilian EDC?

What’s Wrong?

The 1911 is big. It almost always fires a big round, is made of metal, and was designed as a military pistol more than a century ago. And because of these things, it’s also relatively heavy. Sure, a lightweight pistol can be easier to pack, and carrying a gun cocked-and-locked can scare off some EDC users. Some might say you could carry it with an empty chamber to offset that last concern, but let’s not even go there.

The 1911 is powerful and proven, as well as very slim. It is also large, and can be hard to conceal.
The 1911 is powerful and proven, as well as very slim. It is also large, and can be hard to conceal.

As with any choice in life, we go toward the strong points and do what we can to reinforce or offset the weak points. For concealing a full-size 1911 pistol, that means delving deeper than usual into the arcane art and science of comfortable, discreet gun concealment.

Your correspondent here is an average-size adult male, and one who began carrying full-size 1911 pistols concealed at the age of twelve when working part time in a jewelry store, legal in that time and place. In the decades that followed, I carried them concealed as an off-duty and plainclothes cop and as an armed citizen, won pistol matches with them, and killed large animals with them, all of which left me confident with the platform. And what I learned about carrying them concealed is what follows.

A belt by the same maker as holster helps assure a perfect, secure fit. ARG IWB holster, designed by author, and dress gunbelt here are both produced by Mitch Rosen.
A belt by the same maker as holster helps assure a perfect, secure fit. ARG IWB holster, designed by author, and dress gunbelt here are both produced by Mitch Rosen.

A Holster Wardrobe

Because most of us don’t wear the same clothes every day in all four seasons, a single holster may not always do for 24/7/365 carry, either. I travel frequently, teaching firearms and deadly force, and usually have three or four holsters with me. I’m habituated to strong-side hip carry, and will have one inside the waistband (IWB) and one outside the waistband (OWB) because some, but not all, of my pants are sized for IWB. We buy the pants to fit us, and shouldn’t be surprised when it’s uncomfortable to try to make the same pants encompass us and a holstered service pistol. I’d suggest those two styles for the first-time carrier, with a good OWB to start because by definition, the first-timer hasn’t adapted the wardrobe yet.

A magazine with an extended base can be “just right” for author’s spare carry. Arrows show where flange bottom mag (left) and GI-style mag (right) can “dig” uncomfortably against the body.
A magazine with an extended base can be “just right” for author’s spare carry. Arrows show where flange bottom mag (left) and GI-style mag (right) can “dig” uncomfortably against the body.

I add a couple of orthopedic holsters. Being right-handed, I’ll have either a dedicated left-hand holster or an ambidextrous one in the suitcase in case of an injury to the dominant upper limb. (Been there, experienced that.) Because I also have a past history of lumbar back problems and am old enough to recognize the word “relapse,” I try to also have handy a shoulder holster that takes the weight off lower back and hips if that becomes necessary.

Desirable Features

Unless you have really, really big hands, you’ve noticed that the butt of a full-size 1911 protrudes from the bottom of your fist when in firing grasp. In other words, it’s kinda long. That’s why the butt wants to protrude, or “print,” compromising the first word in “concealed carry.” Pro Tip: unless you’re built large with a good distance between back and belly, concealing a 5” barrel 1911 means you probably need a holster with “FBI tilt.” That is, the muzzle is pointed slightly behind you when the gun is holstered, also known as “forward tilt” (of the whole gun from the vertical plane) or “rearward cant” (which describes the orientation of the muzzle). This is true for both IWB and OWB hip carry.

Ayoob suggests one OWB and one IWB to start your concealment holster wardrobe. Both these and the belt are by Mitch Rosen.
Ayoob suggests one OWB and one IWB to start your concealment holster wardrobe. Both these and the belt are by Mitch Rosen.

IWB maximizes concealment because everything much below the bottom edge of the belt is hidden by the trousers if the torso garment rides up, and also because the belt is constantly holding it tight to hip and torso.

If you like the currently trending AIWB (Appendix Inside WaistBand) carry, be glad you chose the 1911. Since the muzzle is going to be pointed at your private parts and/or femoral artery, you’ll have (A) the engaged manual safety of the 1911’s mandatory cocked-and-locked carry, (B) the signature grip safety of the 1911 and (C) the ability to place your thumb on the face of the hammer to keep it from coming forward if all else fails (and to guarantee that the grip safety is not depressed). For AIWB you might want a slightly different holster cant to better allow a locked wrist from the beginning of the draw.

Leather gunbelt mates perfectly with Kydex IWB holster in this excellent combo, both from Precision Holsters.
Leather gunbelt mates perfectly with Kydex IWB holster in this excellent combo, both from Precision Holsters.

That emergency non-dominant-hand side holster I mentioned wants to be a mirror image of what you usually carry. Darn few of us have as many reps as we probably should have running the defensive handgun “weak-handed”; a movement mirror image to what we usually do has a sort of pantograph effect that helps speed the learning process. If you’re a 1911 person, have at least one with an ambidextrous safety, ready to go if you suddenly become a newborn southpaw. (Did I mention, “been there”?)”

For shoulder rigs, find one that’s handy for you to reach. Pure horizontal (muzzle straight to the rear) is probably the fastest shoulder rig orientation, but won’t conceal well with a full-size 1911 unless you have a really deep chest. This writer likes muzzle perpendicular to the ground orientation, particularly for access through heavy outer garments, with a belt loop at the bottom to keep it in place. Nothing beats the time-tested Bianchi X15 orientation for this.

Wilderness Instructor belt of heavy stitched nylon with Blade-Tech mag pouch and WC 47-series Wilson Combat .45 mag. Combo is very concealable, very secure, and very fast and sure.
Wilderness Instructor belt of heavy stitched nylon with Blade-Tech mag pouch and WC 47-series Wilson Combat .45 mag. Combo is very concealable, very secure, and very fast and sure.

Critical Factors

We’ve mentioned the (dis)comfort factor in IWB carry. For regular use, your pants need to be about two inches larger in the waistband to achieve acceptable comfort level. For OWB, the 1911 has all its ammo in that magazine in its grip-frame, and will want to tilt outward from the body. The 5” barrel and commensurate length slide actually helps to push it back toward you for better concealment and stability, since the front end of the gun has the lower body pressing it in that direction. For maximum tight-to-the-body profile, light a candle to the memory of Roy Baker, who designed the Pancake holster circa late 1960s with leather flaring fore and aft of the holster body for the belt slots. This created two more points for belt tension to snug the gun up against the wearer. It has become one of the most widely-copied features in the holster industry.

With IWB carry, the concealing garment can ride all the way up to belt without revealing a pistol like this full-size Springfield Armory Range Officer .45.
With IWB carry, the concealing garment can ride all the way up to belt without revealing a pistol like this full-size Springfield Armory Range Officer .45.

Don’t neglect magazine pouches. The vast majority of 1911s have single-stack magazines: good for slimness because of better concealment and the ability to get more hand around the gun when firing, but leaving you with no more than nine rounds in your .45 or eleven in your 9mm. The fewer rounds in the gun, the more you’ll be depending on reloads if things go really bad. That flared-edge Roy Baker concept helps pull a spare magazine in tighter to the body for concealment. The slimness of single-stack 1911 magazines also makes it easier and more comfortable to carry two instead of just one.

Spare magazine configuration is a consideration. I like a flush-bottom magazine in the gun if concealment under, say, a tailored suit is paramount, but in a vertical magazine pouch magazine length doesn’t seem to impact concealment or carry comfort at all. A magazine with a wide floorplate tends to dig into the ribcage area when carried snug to the body, and a “GI” style flush bottom has a sharp edge that does the same, but the Wilson Combat 47-series magazine has neither of those problems and is my “Mama Bear” compromise preference for concealed carry of spare 1911 mags.

Conclusion

If you find none of the above makes you comfortable in daily carry with your full-size 5” barrel 1911, don’t despair. A quick run through the Springfield Armory catalog will show you versions with shorter barrels, shorter butts and lighter weight. There’s even the rounded-rear-butt profile option on the 9mm EMP4, a lightweight 1911 designed expressly around the short 9mm cartridge and, in my experience, both accurate and reliable.

If you like the way a full-size 1911 shoots for you, the above advice can get you there with acceptable comfort and discretion. So, it looks like the full-size 1911 might be just about right for CCW.