Categories
All About Guns

SMITH & WESSON INC MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE .22 LR

SMITH & WESSON INC - MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE!
SMITH & WESSON INC - MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE! - Picture 2
SMITH & WESSON INC - MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE! - Picture 3
SMITH & WESSON INC - MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE! - Picture 4
SMITH & WESSON INC - MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE! - Picture 6
SMITH & WESSON INC - MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE! - Picture 7
SMITH & WESSON INC - MODEL 41 W/5.5 INCH HEAVY BARREL TARGET MINT-BORE! - Picture 8
Image result for SMITH & WESSON INC MODEL 41
Image result for SMITH & WESSON INC MODEL 41
 

Smith & Wesson Model 41

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Smith & Wesson Model 41
Smith and Wesson Model 41 - 1972.jpg
Smith & Wesson Model 41
Type Semi Automatic Pistol
Place of origin United States
Specifications
Weight 41 oz
Length 1012
Barrel length 512” or 7″

Cartridge .22 long rifle
Action blowbacksingle action only
Rate of fire Semi-automatic
Feed system 10-round single column, detachable box magazine

The Smith & Wesson Model 41 is a semi-automatic pistoldeveloped by Smith & Wesson after World War II as a competitive target pistol.
It was designed with a 105 degree grip angle, the same as the Colt M1911 pistol, to maintain a consistent grip angle.[1]

Production history[edit]

In July 1947 two prototypes, numbered X-41 and X-42 were produced, tested, and improved for the next 10 years. In 1957 the Model 41 was made available to the public for sale when S&W produced 679 units.[2]
At the end of 1958, they had built 9,875 Model 41 pistols. A lighter 5″ barrel was offered in 1958 for field use. The Model 41-1 was introduced in 1960 and was chambered in .22 Short for International Rapid Fire competition.
Only 1000 were made using light aluminum slides necessary for function with the lower powered .22 Short.
In August 1963, the 5″ heavy barrel version came into the market. Stoeger’s Shooter’s Bible of 1964 shows a 7 3/8″ barrel grooved for Olympic center weights.
The cocking indicator and 7 3/8″ bbl were dropped in 1978. The 7″ bbl was introduced in 1978 with no provision for a muzzle brake.
A 6″ barrel was offered for a few months in 1991. In 1992 the Model 41 was dropped from production. In 1994 Smith & Wesson returned it to production as the Model 41 (New Model).[3]

Model 46[edit]

In 1957, Smith & Wesson offered a “no frills” version of the Model 41 designated the model 46. In 1959 it was selected by the U.S. Air Force for basic marksmanship training.
About 4000 units were made in total: 2500 with a 7-inch barrel, 1000 with 5 inch barrels and 500 5 1/2 inch barrels.
The pistol lacked the checkering, polished blue finish, and other refinements of the Model 41.
It proved to be a commercial failure with consumers who preferred the more costly Model 41 and production ceased in 1966, according to firearm historian Sam Fadala.[4]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up^ Hartink, A.E. (2002). The Complete Encyclopedia of Pistols and Revolvers. Edison, New Jersey: Chartwell Books, Inc. pp. 271–272. ISBN 978-0-7858-1519-8.
  2. Jump up^ Jinks, Roy G.; Krein, Sandra C. (2006). Smith & Wesson (MA) (Images of America). Boston: Arcadia Publishing. p. 128. ISBN 978-0-7385-4510-3.
  3. Jump up^ Supica, Jim; Richard Nahas (2007). Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson (3 ed.). F+W Media, Inc. p. 279. ISBN 978-0-89689-293-4.
  4. Jump up^ Fadala, Sam (2002). “Smith & Wesson’s Model 41: collectibles, edibles, and a lesson in history”. American Handgunner22(6): 83.
Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

Cats

Image result for i hate cats memes
Related image
Image result for i hate cats memes

Categories
Uncategorized

A Field Guide to Gun Shop Salesmen

Dear Reader,
                     As I was looking thru the internet since I have no life it seems. Anyways this guy seems to this “Old Fart” . That he knows what he is talking about.
So I hope that you enjoy it.
Grumpy
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video A Field Guide to Gun Shop Sales Men: Beware of the Douchebag

Categories
N.S.F.W.

More of the Friday Anatomy Lessons NSFW

Related image
Chicks with Guns Rock!
garyglamour: Gary Glamour
Kate Upton
| Buffy Sinclair with tan lines ass

Chicks with Guns...
Inline image 7
Inline image 5
 

 Inline image 3
Inline image 4
Inline image 1
Categories
Other Stuff

The American Human Cost of Vietnam

 Vietnam War Casualties
by Race, Ethnicity and Natl Origin

Permission granted to link this site to your Webpage
http://www.americanwarlibrary.com/vietnam/vwc10.htm

V’nam Casualties by Race, Ethnicity and Natl Origin

Enlisted USA USMC USN USAF
White 28044 (83.5) 11888 (85.5) 1823 (94.7) 735 (81.1)
Black 5095 (15.1) 1860 (13.3) 78 (4.0) 82 (9.0)
Amer.Ind. 138 (.4) 73 (.5) 7 (.3) 1 (0.5)
Asian 241 (.7) 76 (.5) 17 (.8) 9 (1.0)
Unknown 26 (.07) 1 (.007) 79 (8.7)

Of all Enlisted Men who died in Vietnam, Blacks made up 14.1% of the total.

This came at a time when they made up 11.0% of the young male population nationwide. If we add officer casualties to enlisted then the black percentage is reduced to 12.5% of all casualties. 
Of the 7262 Blacks who died, 6, 955 or 96% were Army and Marine enlisted men.
The combination of our selective service policies, our AFQT testing of both drafted and volunteers, the need for skilled Enlisted Men in many areas of the US Armed Forces.
All conspired to assign Blacks in greater numbers to the combat units of the Army and Marine Corps. Early in the war, when Blacks made up about 11.0% of our Vietnam force, Black Casualties soared to over 20% of the total (1965, 1966).
Black leaders protested and Pres Johnson ordered that black participation should be cut back in the combat units. As a result, the Black Casualty rate was cut to 11.5% by 1969.
The DoD database contains no info on Hispanic-Amer casualties. Hispanics can be of any race, but the 1980 census revealed that only 2.6% regard themselves as black. In a massive sampling of the database we were able to establish that between 5.0% and 6.0% had Hispanic surnames.
These were Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban and other Latino-Americans with ancestries based in Central and South Amer. The 1970 census which we are using as our V’nam era population base, estimated Hispanic-Americans at 4.5% of the US population.
Thus we think it is safe to say that Hispanic-Americans were overrepresented among Vietnam Casualties. An estimated 5.5% of the casualties against 4.5% of the 1970 population.
These casualties came largely from California and Texas with lesser numbers from Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Florida and New York and some from many states across the country.
During the Vietnam war, the Navy and Air Force became substantially white enclaves. Of the 4953 Navy and Air Force casualties, both officer and enlisted, 4, 736 or 96% were white.
Officer Casualties of all branches were overwhelmingly white.
Of the 7877 officer casualties, 7595 or 96.4% were white, 147 or 1.8% were black; 24 or .3% were Asian, 7 or .08% were American Indian and 104 (1.3%) were unidentified by race.
In terms of national origin/ancestries. Our massive sampling of the database reveals that Americans of Italian, French Canadian, Polish and other Southern and Eastern European surnames made up about 10% of the Casualties.
These casualties came largely from the Northeast and North Central regions, many from the Traditionally Patriotic Working Class Neighborhoods.
It becomes apparent that the remaining 70% of Vietnam Enlisted casualties were of English/Scottish/Welsh, German, Irish, and Scandinavian-Amer ancestries.
More from the South and Midwest than the other regions. Many from the small towns with a family military tradition.
The officer corps has always drawn heavily on English, German, Irish and Scandinavian-Amer ancestries from Lower-Middle and Middle class white collar homes.
With other large percentages from ambitious Blue-Collar and Career military families.
By region, officer casualties came more from the South and West (4.1 per 100000 population) to 3-5 from the Northeast and North Central.
Data compiled William F. Abbott from figures obtained shortly after the construction of the Vietnam War Memorial
 

Categories
Cops

The Texas Rangers

The Texanist: Are the Texas Rangers for Real?

A California transplant wonders if the state’s most legendary law enforcement officers exist only on the small screen.

by 20 COMMENTS

ILLUSTRATION BY TIM BOWER

Q: I grew up in California and shamefully admit that everything I know about the Texas Rangers I learned from TV, mainly Lonesome Dove and Walker, Texas Ranger. But I moved to Houston almost five years ago and haven’t ever seen a Texas Ranger. At least, I don’t think I have. Do they wear uniforms or drive patrol cars? What is their jurisdiction and what kind of authority do they have? I guess my question for you is, are the Texas Rangers for real?
Ronald McNamara, Houston
A: The fact that you have not had any personal interactions with the actual Texas Rangers since your arrival is not an entirely bad thing. Crossing paths with your new state’s most iconic law enforcers could serve as a clue that you are a dirty, lowdown, villainous crook of such ill repute that the Texanist would be forced to withhold his assistance on both legal and moral grounds. Thankfully, it appears that you are just curious about your new home, and are not up to no good. So let’s proceed.

The Texas Rangers are indeed for real and they have been for as long as Texas has been for real. Way back in 1823, just two years after Anglo-American colonization of the territory that would eventually become Texas formally began, Stephen F. Austin, the “Father of Texas,” engaged ten experienced frontiersmen to “act as rangers for the common defense.” Today, under the auspices of the Texas Department of Public Safety, there is a force of some one hundred and sixty commissioned Texas Rangers who are aided by an additional sixty or so support personnel.
Between then and now lies a history so rich and colorful as to have spawned an entire genre of television shows, big-screen movies, and books. Among the numerous depictions are the two you mentioned: 1989’s TV miniseries Lonesome Dove (based on the fine Larry McMurtry novel, a book you really should read), and Walker, Texas Ranger, the TV series starring Oklahoma native Chuck Norris that ran from 1993 to 2001 (and is not, to the best of the Teaxnist’s knowledge, based on a book you need to read). But let’s not forget the Lone Ranger franchise, which started on radio back in 1933 and has seen a dizzying number of iterations, remakes, and reruns (around the Texanist’s house we do not speak of the 2013 big-screen version). Let’s not forget, either, such memorable silver-screeners as 1983’s Lone Wolf McQuade, which starred a younger Chuck Norris, and the 1969 (Glen Campbell) and 2010 (Matt Damon) versions of True Grit.
Every one of these versions, however, even with their fanciful fictionalizations, pales in comparison to the actual tales of the real-life men who chased, captured, and killed more than their fair share of marauders, bandits, and outlaws.
Among the hall-of-fame-level Texas Rangers (FYI, there is an actual Texas Ranger Hall of Fame, located in Waco) are such characters as John Coffee “Jack” Hays, the prototype Ranger; Samuel Walker, of Colt Walker six-shooter fame; Bigfoot Wallace, who survived the Mier Expedition’s infamous Black Bean Episode and is also reputed to have once gobbled down twenty-seven eggs in a single sitting; John S. “Rip” Ford, who, as regimental adjutant during the Mexican War, earned his nickname after shortening his usual “rest in peace” closing of the mounting casualty reports to “R.I.P;” Manuel Trazazas “Lone Wolf” Gonzaullas, who, in the oil fields and along the borderlands, singlehandedly chased gamblers, bootleggers, and drug runners; and Frank Hamer, a Ranger noted for the ambush and killing of murderous celebra-gangsters Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow.
And there are so many more, with so many more notches to their credit. Dastardly gunman John Wesley Hardin was apprehended by Rangers in Florida in 1877. Notorious train robber Sam Bass was felled by Ranger bullets in Williamson County in 1878. And jailbreaking rapist spree murderer Animal McFadden was captured by Rangers in 1986. The list goes on.
Over the decades, beginning with the ten original Rangers who lit out in 1823 and continuing with those who fought in the Texas Revolution, those who fought in the Mexican War, those who assisted in the taming of the frontier, and those who protected the oil fields and the borders, the Rangers have endured—and, let’s acknowledge, engaged in the occasional bouts of ugliness, including the persecution of Hispanics. But they have adapted and evolved.
Today, the Texas Rangers, who are posted in six companies that are HQed in Houston, Garland, Lubbock, Weslaco, El Paso, and Waco/San Antonio, are the state’s lead crime investigators, tasked with handling major incidentsunsolved crimes, serial crimes, public corruption and violations of public integrity, officer involved shootings, and border security.
Simply put, they are the state’s top cops.
It’s not all that surprising that you’ve never spied one. There are, as the Texanist already said, a mere one hundred and sixty of them. And carrying on the stand-apart traditions that the Rangers began with, today’s Rangers wear a uniform that is decidedly uniform, officially consisting of “a western hat, a dress shirt, a tie, a dress coat, appropriate pants, western belt, western boots, and the official Texas Ranger badge pinned above the left shirt pocket.” Their official vehicle is an unmarked Chevrolet, Dodge, or Ford pickup truck.
So if you want to spot one, keep your eyes peeled. But don’t hold your breath. If you continue to mind your Ps and Qs, you may never see a real-life Texas Ranger in the flesh. And that’s okay.
Here is some more about these Hard Noses:

Texas Ranger Division

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
TxDPS, Texas Ranger Division
Texas
TX - Ranger.png

Patch of the TxDPS, Texas Ranger Division
Texas rangers crest.jpg

Logo of the TxDPS, Texas Ranger Division
Badge of the Texas Ranger Division.png

Official 1962 design of Texas Ranger badge
Flag of Texas.svg

Flag of the State of Texas
Agency overview
Formed October 17, 1835; 182 years agomodeled after Stephen F. Austin‘s 1823 ranger companies
Preceding agency Texas State Police
Legal personality Governmental: Government agency
Jurisdictional structure
Operations jurisdiction* State of TexasU.S.
Texas Ranger Division companies map.png
Map of TxDPS, Texas Ranger Division’s jurisdiction.
Size 268,820 square miles (696,240 km2)
Population 27,469,114 (2015 est.)[1]
General nature
Operational structure
Headquarters Austin, Texas
Texas Rangers 162[2]
Support Employees 60[2]
Agency executive Randall Prince, Chief
Parent agency Texas Department of Public Safety
Companies 6
Website
Official Texas Rangers website
Footnotes
Divisional agency: Division of the country, over which the agency has usual operational jurisdiction.

The Texas Ranger Division, commonly called the Texas Rangers, is a law enforcement agency with statewide jurisdiction in Texas, based in the capital city of Austin. Over the years, the Texas Rangers have investigated crimes ranging from murder to political corruption, acted in riot control and as detectives, protected the Governor of Texas, tracked down fugitives, and functioned as a paramilitary force at the service of both the Republic (1836–45) and the state of Texas.
The Texas Rangers were unofficially created by Stephen F. Austin in a call-to-arms written in 1823 and were first headed by Captain Morris. After a decade, on August 10, 1835, Daniel Parker introduced a resolution to the Permanent Council creating a body of rangers to protect the border.[3] The unit was dissolved by the federal authorities during the post–Civil WarReconstruction Era, but was quickly reformed upon the reinstitution of home government. Since 1935, the organization has been a division of the Texas Department of Public Safety; it fulfills the role of Texas’ state bureau of investigation. As of 2015, there are 162 commissioned members of the Ranger force.[4]
The Rangers have taken part in many of the most important events of Texas history, such as stopping the assassination of Presidents William Howard Taft and Porfirio Díaz in El Paso, Texas, and in some of the best-known criminal cases in the history of the Old West, such as those of gunfighter John Wesley Hardin, bank robber Sam Bass, and outlaws Bonnie and Clyde. Scores of books have been written about the Rangers, from well-researched works of nonfiction to pulp novels and other such fiction, making the Rangers significant participants in the mythology of the Wild West. The Lone Ranger, perhaps the best-known example of a Texas Ranger-derived fictional character, draws his primary alias both from having once been a Texas Ranger himself and from being the only surviving member of a posse of six Texas Rangers whose other five members (including his own older brother, a Texas Rangers captain) were killed in a massacre at Bryant’s Gap.
During their history, a distinct Ranger tradition has evolved; their cultural significance to Texians and later Texansis such that they are legally protected against disbandment.[5] There is a museum dedicated to the Texas Rangers in Waco, Texas.

History

An early depiction of a group of Texas Rangers, c. 1845

The rangers were founded in 1823 when Stephen F. Austin, known as the Father of Texas, employed ten men to act as rangers to protect 600 to 700 newly settled families who arrived in Texas following the Mexican War of Independence. While there is some discussion as to when Austin actually employed men as “rangers”, Texas Ranger lore dates the year of their organization to this event.[6] The Texas Rangers were formally constituted in 1835 and, in November, Robert McAlpin Williamson was chosen to be the first Major of the Texas Rangers. Within two years the Rangers comprised more than 300 men.
Following the Texas Revolution and the creation of the Republic of Texas, newly elected president Mirabeau B. Lamar, (the second elected president of the Republic of Texas), raised a force of 56 Rangers to fight the Cherokee and the Comanche, partly in retaliation for the support they had given the Mexicans at the Cordova Rebellion against the Republic.[7] Ten rangers were killed in the Battle of Stone Houses in 1837.[8] The size of the Ranger force was increased from 56 to 150 men by Sam Houston, as President of the Republic, in 1841, (the 2nd time he was elected president of the Republic.)
The Rangers continued to participate in skirmishes with Native Americans through 1846, when the annexation of Texas to the United States and the Mexican–American War saw several companies of Rangers mustered into federal service. They played important roles at various battles, acting as guides and participating in Counter-guerrilla warfare, soon establishing a fearsome reputation among both Mexicans and Americans. At the Battle of Monterrey in September 1846, famous Texas Rangers such as John Coffee “Jack” HaysBen McCullochBigfoot Wallace, and Samuel Hamilton Walker played important roles in the battle, to include advising General William Jenkins Worth on the tactics required to fight inside a Mexican city. Richard Addison Gillespie, a famed Texas Ranger, died at Monterrey, and General Worth renamed a hill “Mount Gillespie” after him.[9] Colonel Hays organized a second regiment of Texas Rangers, including Rip Ford, who fought with General Winfield Scott in his Mexico City Campaign and the Anti guerrilla campaign along his line of communications to Vera Cruz.[10]:60
John Jackson Tumlinson Sr., the first alcalde of the Colorado district, is considered by many Texas Ranger historians to be the first Texas Ranger killed in the line of duty.[11] One of his most urgent issues was protection of settlers from theft and murder by marauders. On his way to San Antonio, in 1823, to discuss the issue with the governor, Tumlinson was killed by Native Americans. His traveling companion, a Mr. Newman, escaped. Tumlinson’s body was never found.[12]

Texas Rangers (1860s)

Following the end of the war in 1848, the Rangers were largely disbanded, but the election of Hardin Richard Runnels as governor in 1857 meant $70,000 was allocated to fund the Rangers under John Salmon “Rip” Ford,[10]:223 a veteran of the Mexican war. The now 100-strong Rangers participated in campaigns against the Comanche and other tribes, whose raids against the settlers and their properties had become common. Ford and his Rangers fought the Comanche in the Battle of Little Robe Creek in 1858 and then Juan Cortinain the Battle of Rio Grande City the following year.[10]:236,275
The success of a series of campaigns in the 1860s marked a turning point in Rangers’ history. The U.S. Army could provide only limited and thinly-stretched protection in the enormous territory of Texas. By contrast, the Rangers’ effectiveness when dealing with these threats convinced both the people of the state and the political leaders that a well-funded and organized state Ranger force was essential. Such a force could use the deep familiarity with the territory and the proximity with the theater of operations as major advantages in its favor. This option was not pursued, in view of the emerging national political problems (prelude to the American Civil War), and the Rangers were again dissolved.[13]

Texas Historical Marker for Texas Ranger Camp Roberts in Blanco Canyon

Many Rangers enlisted to fight for the Confederacyfollowing the secession of Texas from the United States in 1861 during the Civil War. In 1870, during Reconstruction, the Rangers were briefly replaced by a Union-controlled version called the Texas State Police, disbanded only three years later.[14]The state election of 1873 saw newly elected Governor Richard Coke and the state legislaturerecommission the Rangers.[15][16] During these times, many of the Rangers’ myths were born, such as their success in capturing or killing notorious criminals and desperados (including bank robber Sam Bass and gunfighter John Wesley Hardin), their involvement in the Mason County War, the HorrellHiggins Feud, and their decisive role in the defeat of the Comanche, Kiowa and Apachepeoples. The Apache “dreaded the Texas Rangers…whose guns were always loaded and whose aim was unerring; they slept in the saddle and ate while they rode, or done without…when they took up our trail they followed it determinedly and doggedly day and night.”[17] Also during these years, the Rangers suffered the only defeat in their history when they surrendered at the Salinero Revolt in 1877. Despite the fame of their deeds, the conduct of the Rangers during this period was questionable. In particular, Leander H. McNelly and his men used ruthless methods that often rivaled the brutality of their opponents, such as taking part in summary executions and confessions induced by tortureand intimidation.[18]

Capt. Monroe Fox and two other Rangers on horseback with their lariats around the bodies of dead Mexican bandits, after the Norias Ranch Raid August 8, 1915

The Rangers next saw serious action at the summit of William Howard Taft and President Porfirio Díazin 1909, preventing an assassination of both presidents, and during the subsequent Mexican Revolution.[19][20] The breakdown of law and order on the Mexican side of the border, coupled with the lack of federal military forces, meant the Rangers were once again called upon to restore and maintain law and order, by any necessary means. However, the situation necessitated the appointment of hundreds of new special Rangers by the state, which neglected to carefully screen aspiring members. The Rangers were responsible for several incidents, ending in the January 28, 1918, massacre of the male population[21](15 Mexican men and boys ranging in age from 16 to 72 years) of the tiny community of Porvenir, Texas, on the Mexican border in western Presidio County. Before the decade was over, thousands of lives were lost, Texans and Mexicans alike. In January 1919, an investigation launched by Texas lawmaker JT Canales found that from 300 to 5,000 people, mostly of Hispanic descent, had been killed by Rangers from 1910 to 1919, and that members of the Rangers had been involved in many acts of brutality and injustice.[22] The Rangers were reformed by a resolution of the Legislature in 1919, which saw the special Ranger groups disbanded and a complaints system instituted.
The Great Depression forced both the federal and state governments to cut down on personnel and funding of their organizations, and the number of commissioned officers was reduced to 45, with the only means of transportation afforded to Rangers being free railroad passes or using their personal horses. The agency was again damaged after supporting Governor Ross Sterling in his re-election campaign — but after his opponent Miriam Amanda “Ma” Ferguson won, she proceeded to discharge all serving Rangers in 1933.
The ensuing disorganization of law enforcement in the state caused the Legislature to engage a firm of consultants to reorganize the state security agencies. The consultants recommended merging the Rangers with the Texas Highway Patrol under a new agency called the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS). This change took place in 1935, with an initial budget of $450,000. With minor rearrangements over the years, the 1935 reforms have ruled the Texas Rangers’ organization until present day. Hiring new members, which had been largely a political decision, was achieved through a series of examinations and merit evaluations. Promotion relied on seniority and performance in the line of duty. Today, the historical importance and symbolism of the Texas Rangers is such that they are protected by statute from being disbanded.[23]

Old West image

From its earliest days, the Rangers were surrounded with the mystique of the Old West. Although popular culture’s image of the Rangers is typically one of rough living, tough talk and a quick draw, Ranger Captain John “Rip” Ford described the men who served him as thus:

A large proportion … were unmarried. A few of them drank intoxicating liquors. Still, it was a company of sober and brave men. They knew their duty and they did it. While in a town they made no braggadocio demonstration. They did not gallop through the streets, shoot, and yell. They had a specie of moral discipline which developed moral courage. They did right because it was right.[24]

As it happened with many Old West myths like Billy the Kid or Wyatt Earp, the Rangers’ legendary aura was in part a result of the work of sensationalistic writers and the contemporary press, who glorified and embellished their deeds in an idealized manner. While some Rangers could be considered criminals wearing badges by a modern observer, many documented tales of bravery and selflessness are also intertwined in the group’s history.[25]
Despite the age of the agency, and the many contributions they have made to law enforcement over their entire history, Texas Rangers developed most of their reputation during the days of the Old West. Of the 79 Rangers killed in the line of duty, 30 were killed during the Old West period of 1858 through 1901. Also during this period, two of their three most high-profile captures or killings took place, the capture of John Wesley Hardin and the killing of Sam Bass, in addition to the capture of Texas gunman Billy Thompson and others.[26]
American historian Andrew Graybill has argued that the Texas Rangers resemble the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in many ways. He argues that each organization protected the established order by confining and removing Native Americans, by tightly controlling the mixed blood peoples (the African Americans in Texas, and the Métis in Canada), assisted the large-scale ranchers against the small-scale ranchers and farmers who fenced the land, and broke the power of labor unions that tried to organize the workers of industrial corporations.[27]

“One Riot, One Ranger”

Texas Rangers gathered at El Paso to stop the illegal Maher–Fitzsimmons fight, 1896. At the front row from the left are Adj. General W Mabry, and Capts. J Hughes, J Brooks, Bill McDonald (coiner of the phrase) and J Rogers.

A famous phrase associated with the Rangers is One Riot, One Ranger. It is somewhat apocryphal in that there was never actually a riot; rather, the phrase was coined by Ranger Captain William “Bill” McDonald, who was sent to Dallas in 1896 to prevent the illegal heavyweight prize fight between Pete Maher and Bob Fitzsimmons that had been organized by Dan Stuart and patronized by the eccentric “Hanging Judge” Roy Bean of Langtry, Texas.[28] According to the story, McDonald’s train was met by the mayor, who asked the single Ranger where the other lawmen were. McDonald is said to have replied: “Hell! Ain’t I enough? There’s only one prize-fight!”[29]
Although some measure of truth lies within the tale, it is largely an idealized account written by author Bigelow Paine and loosely based on McDonald’s statements, published in Paine’s 1909 book Captain Bill McDonald: Texas Ranger. In truth, the fight had been so heavily publicized that nearly every Ranger was on hand, including all captains and their superior, Adjutant General Woodford H Mabry. Many of them were undecided on stopping the fight or attending it; and other famous lawmen, such as Bat Masterson, were also present. The orders of the governor were clear, however, and the bout was stopped. Stuart then tried to reorganize it in El Paso and later in Langtry, but the Rangers thwarted his attempts. Finally, the fight took place on the Mexican side of the Rio Grande near Langtry.[30]
The motto appears on the pedestal of the bronze Texas Ranger statue at the Dallas Love Field airport, contributed in 1961 by Earle Wyatt and his wife.[31]

High-profile cases

The Texas Rangers have assisted in many high-profile cases throughout the years. Most of them had a short-lived repercussion, while others have received wide coverage by the press and writers alike. However, there are some cases that are deeply entrenched in the Rangers’ lore, such as those of outlaw John Wesley Hardin, bank robber Sam Bass, and Bonnie and Clyde.

Sam Bass[edit]

Bank robber Sam Bass

In 1878, Sam Bass and his gang, who had perpetrated a series of bank and stagecoach robberies beginning in 1877, held up two stagecoaches and four trains within 25 miles (40 km) of Dallas. The gang quickly found themselves the object of pursuit across North Texas by a special company of Texas Rangers headed by Captain Junius “June” Peak. Bass was able to elude the Rangers until a member of his party, Jim Murphy, turned informer, cut a deal to save himself, and led the law to the gang. As Bass’ band rode south, Murphy wrote to Major John B. Jones, commander of the Frontier Battalion of Texas Rangers.
Jones set up an ambush at Round Rock, where the Bass gang had planned to rob the Williamson County Bank. On July 19, 1878, Bass and his gang scouted the area before the actual robbery. They bought some tobacco at a store, and were noticed by Williamson County Sheriff Caige Grimes, who approached the group and was shot and killed. A heavy gunfight ensued between the outlaws and the Rangers and local lawmen. A deputy named Moore was mortally wounded, as was Bass. The gang quickly mounted their horses and tried to escape while continuing to fire, and as they galloped away, Bass was shot again in the back by Ranger George Herold. Bass was later found lying helpless in a pasture north of town by the authorities. They took him into custody; he died from his wounds the next day.

John Wesley Hardin

One of Texas’ deadliest outlaws, John Wesley Hardin, was reputed to be the meanest man alive, an accolade he supposedly earned by killing a man for snoring. He committed his first murder at age 15, and admitted to killing more than 40 men over 27 years. In May 1874, Hardin killed Charles Webb, the deputy sheriff of Brown Countyand a former Texas Ranger. John Barclay Armstrong, a Texas Ranger known as “McNelly’s Bulldog” since he served with the Special Force as a sergeant and Captain Leander McNelly’s right hand, received permission to arrest the outlaw. He pursued Hardin across Alabama and into Florida, and caught up with him in Pensacola.

John Barclay Armstrong

After Armstrong, Colt pistol in hand, boarded a train that Hardin and four companions were on, the outlaw shouted, “Texas, by God!” and drew his own pistol. When it was over, one of his gang members was killed, and his three surviving friends were staring at Armstrong’s pistol. Hardin had been knocked unconscious. Armstrong’s hat had been pierced by a bullet, but he was uninjured. Hardin was charged for murder, convicted, and sentenced to 25 years in prison. Seventeen years later, Hardin was pardoned by Governor Jim Hogg and released from prison on March 16, 1894. He moved to El Paso, where he began practicing law. On August 19, 1895, he was murdered during a poker game at the Acme Saloon over a personal disagreement.[32]

Taft-Díaz Assassination Attempt[edit]

In 1909, Private C.R. Moore of Company A, “performed one of the most important feats in the history of the Texas Rangers”.[33] William Howard Taft and Porfirio Díaz planned a summit in El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, a historic first meeting between a U.S. president and a Mexican president and the first time an American president would cross the border into Mexico.[34] But tensions rose on both sides of the border, including threats of assassination, so the Texas Rangers, 4,000 U.S. and Mexican troops, U.S. Secret Service agents and U.S. marshals were all called in to provide security.[35] Frederick Russell Burnham, the celebrated scout, was put in charge of a 250-person private security detail hired by John Hays Hammond, a nephew of Texas Ranger John Coffee Hays, who in addition to owning large investments in Mexico was a close friend of Taft from Yale and a U.S. Vice-Presidential candidate in 1908.[36][37] On October 16, the day of the summit, Burnham and Private C.R. Moore discovered a man holding a concealed palm pistolstanding at the El Paso Chamber of Commerce building along the procession route.[38][39]Burnham and Moore captured, disarmed, and arrested the would-be assassin within only a few feet of Taft and Díaz.[33][20]

Bandit War

The Bandit War, a small but major campaign during the Border War, was fought in 1910-1915 in Texas.[40] The conflict was a series of violent raids conducted by Mexican revolutionaries in the American settlements of Tamaulipas, Coahuila and Chihuahua. The Texas Rangers became the primary fighting force and protection of the Texans during the operations against the rebels. The Mexican faction’s incursion in the territory were carried out by the Seditionistas and Carrancistas, led by major political leaders such as Basilio Ramos and Luis de la Rosca. However, the Seditionistas were never able to launch a full-scale invasion of the United States so they resorted to conducting small raids into Texas. Much of the fighting involved the Texas Ranger Division though the United States Army also engaged in operations against the rebels. The Texas Rangers were led by Captain Harry Ransom on the orders of the Governor of Texas, James E. Ferguson.[41][42]

Bonnie and Clyde

Frank Hamer, the longtime Ranger captain, left the Rangers in 1932. In 1934, at the request of Col. Lee Simmons, head of the Texas prison system, Hamer was asked to use his skills to track down Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow, whose Barrow gang had engineered a successful breakout of associates imprisoned at the Eastham Prison Farm in Houston County. Prisoner and Barrow friend Joe Palmer had killed a guard while escaping, and the Barrow gang was responsible for many murders, robberies, and car thefts in Texas alone. Nine law enforcement officers had already died in confrontations with the gang.
After tracking the Barrow gang across nine states, Hamer, in conjunction with officials in Louisiana, learned Bonnie and Clyde had visited a home in Bienville Parish on May 21, 1934, and that Clyde had designated a rendezvous point in the vicinity with gang member Henry Methvin, in case they were later separated. Methvin, allegedly cooperating with law enforcement, made sure he was separated from them that evening in Shreveport, and the posse set up an ambush along the route to the rendezvous at Highway 154, between Gibsland and Sailes. Led by former Rangers Hamer and B. M. “Manny” Gault, the posse included Sheriff Henderson Jordan and Deputy Prentiss Oakley of Bienville Parish, Louisiana, and Dallas County Deputies Bob Alcorn and Ted Hinton. They were in place by 9:00 that night, waiting all through the next day, but with no sign of Bonnie and Clyde.
Around 9:00 a.m. on May 23, the posse, concealed in the bushes and almost ready to concede defeat, heard Clyde’s stolen Ford V-8 approaching. When he stopped to speak with Henry Methvin’s father (planted there with his truck that morning to distract Clyde and force him into the lane closest to the posse), the lawmen opened fire, killing Bonnie and Clyde while shooting a combined total of approximately 130 rounds.

Irene Garza Murder

The Texas Rangers have received widespread coverage for their role in the investigation of the death of Irene Garza, a Texas beauty queen. In this murder from 1960, there has been one primary suspect, Father John Feit, but the case stalled for many years as the Hidalgo County district attorney did not feel that the evidence was sufficient to secure a conviction. Texas Ranger Rudy Jaramillo has been working on the case since 2002.[43] In 2015, under a new district attorney, Feit was indicted for murder. As of 2016, he awaits trial.[44]

Duties

The duties of the Texas Ranger Division consist of conducting criminal and special investigations; apprehending wanted felons; suppressing major disturbances; the protection of life and property; and rendering assistance to local law enforcement in suppressing crime and violence. The Texas Ranger Division is also responsible for the gathering and dissemination of criminal intelligence pertaining to all facets of organized crime. The Texas Ranger Division joins with all other enforcement agencies in the suppression of the same; under orders of the Director, suppress all criminal activity in any given area, when it is apparent that the local officials are unwilling or unable to maintain law and order; also upon the request or order of a judge of a court of record, Texas Rangers may serve as officers of the court and assist in the maintenance of decorum, the protection of life, and the preservation of property during any judicial proceeding; and provide protection for elected officials at public functions and at any other time or place when directed. The Texas Rangers, with the approval of the Director, may conduct investigations of any alleged misconduct on the part of other Department of Public Safety personnel.[45]

Organization

The Texas Rangers’ internal organization still maintains the basic outlines that were set in 1935. The agency is divided into seven companies: six District Companies lettered from “A” to “F”, and Headquarters Company “H”. The number of personnel is set by the Texas Legislature; as of 2014, the Texas Rangers number 150 commissioned officers, one forensic artist, one fiscal analyst and 24 civilian support personnel.[46] The Legislature has also made a provision for the temporary commissioned appointment of up to 300 Special Rangers for use in investigative or emergency situations. The statewide headquarters of the Texas Rangers is located in Austin at the Texas DPS headquarters. As of 1 October 2014, the Chief of the Texas Rangers is Assistant Director of DPS Randall Prince.
The District Companies’ headquarters are distributed in six geographical locations:[47]

  • Houston is the headquarters for Company A, commanded by Major Jason Taylor.
  • Garland is the headquarters for Company B, commanded by Major Grover Huff.
  • Lubbock is the headquarters for Company C, commanded by Major Todd Snyder.
  • Weslaco is the headquarters for Company D, commanded by Major Brian Burzynski.
  • El Paso is the headquarters for Company E, commanded by Major Crayton McGee.
  • Waco is the headquarters for Company F, commanded by Major Chance Collins.

Division Headquarters:

  • Austin is the home of Division Headquarters, commanded by Chief Randall Prince. The Special Operations Group commanded by Major J.D. Robertson include Special Weapons and Tactics Team (SWAT), Bomb Squad, Ranger Reconnaissance Team, Special Response Teams (SRT), Crisis Negotiation Teams (CNT), and Border Security Operations Center (BSOC) – Joint Operations and Intelligence Centers (JOIC). Specialized Programs include the Unsolved Crimes Investigation Program and Public Corruption Unit.

Uniforms

The modern-day badge of a Texas Ranger is compared to the obverse and reverse of a 1948 cinco pesos coin from which it is made.

Modern-day Rangers (as well as their predecessors) do not have a prescribed uniform, per se, although the State of Texas does provide guidelines as to appropriate Ranger attire, including a requirement that Rangers wear clothing that is western in nature. Currently, the favored attire includes white shirt and tie, khaki/tan or gray trousers, light-colored western hat, “ranger” belt, and cowboy boots. Historically, according to pictorial evidence, Rangers wore whatever clothes they could afford or muster, which were usually worn out from heavy use. While Rangers still pay for their clothing today, they receive an initial stipend to offset some of the costs of boots, gunbelts and hats.
To carry out their horseback missions, Rangers adapted tack and personal gear to fit their needs. Until the beginning of the 20th century, the greatest influence was from the vaqueros(Mexican cowboys). Saddles, spurs, ropes and vests used by the Rangers were all fashioned after those of the vaqueros. Most Rangers also preferred to wear broader-brimmed sombreros as opposed to cowboy hats, and they favored square-cut, knee-high boots with a high heel and pointed toes, in a more Spanish style. Both groups carried their guns the same way, with the holsters positioned high around their hips instead of low on the thigh. This placement made it easier to draw and shoot while riding a horse.[48]

Badges

The wearing of badges became more common in the late 1800s. Historians have put forth several reasons for the lack of the regular use of a badge; among them, some Rangers felt a shiny badge was a tempting target. Other historians have speculated there was no real need to show a badge to a hostile Native American or outlaw. Additionally, from a historical viewpoint, a Ranger’s pay was so scanty that the money required for such fancy accoutrements was rarely available. Nevertheless, some Rangers did wear badges, and the first of these appeared around 1875. They were locally made and varied considerably from one to another, but they invariably represented a star cut from a Mexican silver coin (usually a five-pesos coin). The design is reminiscent of Texas’s Lone Star flag.
Although present-day Rangers wear the familiar “star in a wheel” badge, it was adopted officially only recently. The current design of the Rangers’ badge was incorporated in 1962, when Ranger Hardy L. Purvis and his mother donated enough Mexican five-pesos coins to the DPS to provide badges for all 62 Rangers who were working at that time as commissioned officers.[49]

Officers killed

Since the establishment of the Texas Department of Public Safety Texas Rangers Division, 108 Rangers have died in the line of duty. The following list also contains officers from the Texas Rangers, which was merged into the Texas Department of Public Safety.[50][51]
The causes of death are as follows:

Causes of death Number of deaths
Assault
24
Automobile accident
2
Duty related illness
7
Drowned
2
Gunfire
66
Gunfire (accidental)
3
Stabbed
1
Struck by train
2
Struck by vehicle
1

In popular culture

Chuck Norris portrayed a modern-day ranger in the television-series Walker, Texas Ranger

Numerous films and television series focus closely or loosely on the Texas Rangers. In addition, the Texas Rangers baseball team, when it relocated to the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex in 1972, took its name from the legendary force.
Tales of the Texas Rangers a Western procedural radio program that ran on NBC from 1950 to 1951, starring Joel McCrea, which was described as Dragnet with a Western flavor, and dealt with Ranger investigations in the 1930s and 1940s. The program was adapted to television in the mid-50s as a Saturday morning juvenile Western, again on NBC, including contemporary stories as well as stories from the old West.
The 1957-1959 CBS western series, Trackdown, starring Robert Culp as the fictional Ranger Hoby Gilman, even carried the official endorsement of the Rangers and the State of Texas. Trackdown episodes were set in both fictional and real locations in Texas though the series itself was filmed at the former Iverson Movie Ranch in ChatsworthCalifornia. Episodes focus on Gilman tracking down bank robbershorse thieves, swindlers, and murderers.[52]
John Horton Slaughter, a former Texas Ranger who later became a rancher in and the sheriff of Cochise County in southeastern Arizona, was the focus of the 1958-1961 Walt Disney miniseries Texas John Slaughter.
The Lone Ranger, which aired from 1949 to 1957 on ABC and was that network’s first hit series, is a tale of the Rangers too, starring Clayton Moore and for two seasons John Hart.
CBS had a children’s program from 1955 to 1959, Tales of the Texas Rangers, with Willard Parker and Harry Lauter as fictional rangers, which ran on the Saturday morning scheduleand later in rebroadcasts on ABC.[53]
From 1965 to 1967, NBC aired Laredo, a light-hearted look at a company of Rangers in the border city of Laredo. A spin-off of The VirginianLaredo starred Philip CareyPeter BrownWilliam Smith, and Neville Brand.
Rango (1967). Short-lived comedy series starring Tim Conway as the eponymous Rango, a bumbling Texas Ranger in the 19th century. Rango got the job only because his uncle is a high-ranking officer in the organization.
The syndicated western series Judge Roy Bean, with Edgar Buchanan in the starring role of Justice of the Peace Roy Bean, had a Texas Ranger character, Steve, played by Russell Hayden.
Both the novel series Lonesome Dove and its television adaptation focus on the Texas Rangers, among them Woodrow F. Call and Augustus McCrae.
The film Lone Wolf McQuade (1983) starring Chuck NorrisDavid CarradineBarbara Carrera and Robert Beltran follows Texas Ranger J.J. McQuade (Norris) as he investigates a ring of arms dealers.
Walter Hill‘s movie Extreme Prejudice (1987), starring Nick NoltePowers BootheMichael Ironside and María Conchita Alonso, focuses on the fight between a ranger and his former childhood friend, turned drug lord.
The television series Walker, Texas Ranger (1993-2001) followed the fictional Rangers Cordell Walker and James Trivette, played by Chuck Norris and Clarence Gilyard, Jr.. In the series, Walker and Trivette are assigned to B Company, stationed first in Fort Worth, and later in Dallas.
The animated television series King of the Hill (1997-2010) featured Jeff Boomhauer, whose profession was a long running secret (much like the state that houses Springfield, of the Simpsons’ residence in The Simpsons). In the final episode of King of the Hill that aired September 13, 2009, it was revealed that Jeff Boomhauer was indeed a Texas Ranger when his wallet revealed his badge and information.
The film Man of the House (2005), starring Tommy Lee Jones as a Texas Ranger.
In Harry Turtledove‘s alternative history novel, Settling Accounts: In at the Death (2007), Texas Rangers from the newly recreated Republic of Texas, detain and arrest Jefferson Pinkard, commander of Camp Determination.
The novel True Grit and the 1969 and 2010 films based on the novel include a Texas Ranger as a prominent member of the story.
In the television series From Dusk ’til Dawn (2014) includes Texas Rangers as the primary antagonists hunting the main characters and also discusses some of the history of racial tension along the Texas-Mexico Border and the suffering of the Mexican and Mexican American peoples of that area at the hands of “Los Rinches” or the Texas Rangers.
In the post-apocalypse television series Revolution (2012-2014), when Texas is once again an independent nation, the Texas Rangers appear in the second season and serve as the main military of Texas.
Ranger Molly Parker was portrayed in the eight-episode television drama (2014) Killer Women, created by Hannah Shakespeare and starring Tricia Helfer as Molly Parker. All of the criminals portrayed in the series were women, and the show highlighted how only a very few Rangers were women.
The film Hell or High Water (2016), an American neo-Western crime thriller film directed by David Mackenzie and written by Taylor Sheridan, features prominently the roles of two Texas Rangers (portrayed by Jeff Bridges and Gil Birmingham), who pursue two brothers (portrayed by Chris Pine and Ben Foster) engaged in a series of bank robberies throughout the small towns of the region known as West Texas (part of the greater Comancheria) in order to save their family ranch from foreclosure and repossession.
In 2016 Faber & Faber published the first in a series of novels featuring 1960’s Texas Ranger John Q, by JM Gulvin.

Hall of Fame and Museum

The Texas Ranger Hall of Fame and Museum opened in Waco in 1968.

Notable Texas Rangers

Categories
All About Guns

Remington Backs new Model 700 PCR with 3-Shot Sub-MOA Guarantee by MAX SLOWIK on JANUARY 18, 2018

Big Green put a lot of great features in their new PCR.  (Photo: Remington)

 
 
 
 
 
 
Remington is announcing a new Model 700 bolt-action rifle with a custom-style modular precision chassis chambered for .260 Remington, 6.5mm Creedmoor and .308 Winchester. Each rifle is tested using Remington’s military-proven Computer Aided Targeting System, or CATS, to ensure a 3-shot sub-MOA guarantee.
Remington Defense developed the CATS program as part of their mission to supply accuracy-proven rifles to military and police snipers around the world. Paired with some of the best components on the commercial market, Remington is pleased to introduce the Model 700 PCR, or Precision Chassis Rifle.
“This is the same system used to confirm the accuracy of Remington Defense sniper rifles currently serving in theatres worldwide,” said Remington in their announcement. “By removing the human element, this process delivers unwaveringly precise and repeatable results. A printed copy of each Model 700 PCR’s CATS accuracy test is included in the box before it leaves our engineers’ hands.”
Remington’s not the first company to develop a custom-style production rifle for commercial and police markets. But it’s clear they paid attention to their competition developing the PCR. The gun is priced right for target shooting, hunting, competition, and duty.

Old-school meets next-gen with this black bolt gun. (Photo: Remington)

If it wasn’t in the name it would be hard to recognize this as a Model 700 rifle. The PCR is paired with an advanced, modular aluminum chassis and free-floating handguard. The handguard features SquareDrop slots, a KeyMod variant, for use with a huge range of accessories like bipods, sling points, lights and pointers.

SEE ALSO: Remington 870 DM (Detachable Magazine)— Full Review

The chassis is weather-proof hard-anodized aluminum with a matte black Teflon finish for added protection. It incorporates AR-pattern components and comes with a Magpul Gen 3 PRS stock. The stock is fully-adjustable for cheek and buttpad height and length of pull. Additionally, the PCR uses AR pistol grips and Magpul magazines.
In all three chamberings, the PCR sports a 24-inch barrel that’s threaded for use with muzzle brakes and suppressors. Every barrel has 5R threads to reduce bullet deformation and to promote accuracy. Other solid features include an oversized, down-turned bolt handle and X-Mark Pro externally-adjustable trigger.
With all of these components standard, the PCR has a $1,199 MSRP. With real-world prices less than that, the PCR is sure to take a bite out of the fast-growing practical-tactical bolt-action market.

Thinking about getting a next-generation 700? Let us know in the comments!

***Shop GunsAmerica for Your New Remington Today***

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Well I thought it was funny!

How to interpret Gun Violence

Inline image 1

Categories
Cops

I like this guys style

Categories
N.S.F.W.

1984 is alive & well!

George Orwell was an absolute genius back in 1948. As he predicted this stuff in his book “1984”.
When I read it back in school, I thought it would never happen here. More the Fool am I!
GrumpyRelated image

The Disaster Myth Narrative: No One Panics, No One Loots, No One Goes Hungry

Tyler Durden's picture
Authored by Daisy Luther via The Organic Prepper blog,

The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.  ~ George Orwell

A few years back, I was doing some research about the aftermath of some natural disasters that took place here in America. I was shocked to find that the articles I was looking for – ones that I had read in the past – were pretty hard to find, but articles refuting the sought-for pieces were rampant.  Not just one event, but every single crisis aftermath that I looked up, had articles that were written after the fact stating in no uncertain terms that the hunger, chaos, and unrest never happened.

A Blended, Active Approach: Quantitative Analysis Plus Human Skill

A blended approach to investment management combines the complementary strengths of quantitative analysis and the power of human judgment in pursuit of risk-adjusted returns.

Apparently we, the preparedness community, are all wrong when it comes to the belief that after a disaster, chaos erupts and civic disorder is the rule of the day. That is only a disaster myth, and the public narrative belies it all.
Listen to the “experts” and they will confirm, it never happens.
looters2

Panic?  What panic?

According to newspaper articles written after Superstorm Sandy devastated the East Coast and after Hurricane Katrina caused countless billions in damage in New Orleans, people were calm, benevolent and peaceful.  Heck, they were all standing around singing Kumbayah around a campfire, sharing their canned goods, calming frightened puppies, and helping the elderly.
Apparently, studies prove that the fear of anarchy, lawlessness, and chaos is nothing but the “disaster myth”.  Reams of examples exist of the goodness and warmth of society as a whole after disaster strikes. All the stories you read at the time were just that – stories, according to the mainstream media:

Yet there are a few examples stubbornly fixed in the popular imagination of people reacting to a natural disaster by becoming primal and vicious. Remember the gangs “marauding” through New Orleans, raping and even cannibalizing people in the Super-Dome after Hurricane Katrina? It turns out they didn’t exist. Years of journalistic investigations showed them to be racist fantasies. They didn’t happen. Yes, there was some “looting” — which consisted of starving people breaking into closed and abandoned shops for food. Of course human beings can behave atrociously – but the aftermath of a disaster seems to be the time when it is least likely. (source)

Looting?  Only hungry people getting food from unmanned stores. Who wouldn’t do that?
Beatings and assaults?  Didn’t happen. Disturbed people made these stories up for attention.
Gang rapes?  No way. You watch too much Law and Order: SVU.
Murder, mayhem, and gangs of youth on the streets?  Silly readers – we just made that up.
loot
The Disaster Myth is a narrative created by the establishment and delivered by their stoolies in the mainstream media The Disaster Myth points fingers at many of the things that are commonly believed to be true by the preparedness community.  Included in this narrative:

  1. People do not panic after a disaster – instead, they pull together.
  2. The official government response is always speedy and appropriate – unless you are a person of color, in which case you will be denied assistance based on your race, because racism is the current agenda
  3. You will be taken care of if you simply comply peacefully with authorities.
  4. There is little increase in post-disaster crime.

These statements all stand in direct opposition to the stories we hear from news sources during the crisis.  We heard terrible stories from eyewitnesses who suffered from hunger, thirst, and unsanitary condition in the Superdome after Katrina.  We heard about citizens being robbed of their 2nd Amendment rights by police after the crisis, and we heard about gang rapes, looting, and mayhem.  Fast forward to Sandy where people were defecating in the hallways of their high rise apartments and digging through garbage to find food just a few days after the storm.  As for the official response, who can forget the FEMA shelter that closed because of inclement weather?  Of course, the weather was inclement – it was a freaking weather-related disaster!
Mac Slavo of SHTFplan wrote of the unrest, discomfort, and mayhem after Superstorm Sandy ransacked the East Coast:

For tens of thousands of east coast residents that worst case scenario is now playing out in real-time. No longer are images of starving people waiting for government handouts restricted to just the third-world.
 
In the midst of crisis, once civilized societies will very rapidly descend into chaos when essential infrastructure systems collapse.
 
Though the National Guard was deployed before the storm even hit, there is simply no way for the government to coordinate a response requiring millions of servings of food, water and medical supplies
 
Many east coast residents who failed to evacuate or prepare reserve supplies ahead of the storm are being forced to fend for themselves.
 
Frustration and anger have taken hold, as residents have no means of acquiring food or gas and thousands of trucks across the region remain stuck in limbo.
 
Limited electricity has made it possible for some to share their experiences:
 
Via Twitter:

  • I was in chaos tonite tryin to get groceries…lines for shuttle buses, only to get to the no food left & closing early (link)
  • I’m not sure what has shocked me more, all the communities around me destroyed, or the 5 hour lines for gas and food. (link)
  • Haven’t slept or ate well in a few days. Hope things start getting better around here soon (link)
  • These days a lot of people are impatient because they’re used to fast things. Fast food, fast internet, fast lines and fast shipping etc. (link)
  • Glad Obama is off to Vegas after his 90 minute visit. Gas lines are miles long.. Running out of food and water. Great Job (link)
  • Went to the Grocery store and lines were crazy but nail salon was empty so I’ve got a new gel manicure and some Korean junk food (link)
  • So f*cking devastated right now. Smell burning houses. People fighting for food. Pitch darkness. I may spend the night in rockaway to help (link)

garbage food
At the time of the event, even the mainstream reported on the affluent East Side residents dumpster diving in search of food. Was this NBC report, complete with video, a work of salacious fiction?
dumpster-diving-sandy
As far as civil unrest is concerned, the Twittersphere was jammed with people planning looting sprees in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy.  Those who were already of criminal leanings saw the disaster as a great opportunity. In the great North American Edit, however, these tweets are said to be part of the myth – apparently, they were just kids playing around Some reports pooh-poohed the very idea that looters had run amok.
looters_tweet
This article from Prison Planet refutes all of the refuting and says that the civil unrest DID occur and that it generally does, given evidence from past events.

Legends from the past? Every single extreme weather event in recent years in the United States has been followed by looting.
 
As MSNBC reported at the time, looting during Hurricane Katrina was so prevalent that it “took place in full view of police and National Guard troops.”
 
Residents described the scenes as being like “downtown Baghdad” as looters filled garbage cans full of stolen goods and floated them down flooded streets.
 
As Forbes’ Erik Kain points out, “looting and rioting…occur after most natural disasters,” including after Hurricane Irene as well as Hurricane Isaac.
 
Looters also targeted victims of the Colorado wildfires earlier this year.

Does this sound familiar?

This revision of inconvenient history will sound quite familiar to anyone who has read George Orwell’s masterpiece 1984 (which was not meant to be an instruction manual, by the way.)  In the novel, the main character, Winston Smith, worked for the Ministry of Truth, which was actually a department of propaganda whose job it was to rewrite any faction of history that did not make the government look omniscient.

In George Orwell’s novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, the Ministry of Truth is Oceania’s propaganda ministry. It is responsible for any necessary falsification of historical events. The word truth in the title Ministry of Truth should warn, by definition, that the “minister” will self-serve its own “truth”; the title implies the willful fooling of posterity using “historical” archives to show “in fact” what “really” happened. As well as administering truth, the ministry spreads a new language amongst the populace called Newspeak, in which, for example, truth is understood to mean statements like 2 + 2 = 5 when the situation warrants.
 
The Ministry of Truth is involved with news media, entertainment, the fine arts and educational books. Its purpose is to rewrite history to change the facts to fit Party doctrine for propaganda effect. For example, if Big Brother makes a prediction that turns out to be wrong, the employees of the Ministry of Truth go back and rewrite the prediction so that any prediction Big Brother previously made is accurate. This is the “how” of the Ministry of Truth’s existence. Within the novel, Orwell elaborates that the deeper reason for its existence is to maintain the illusion that the Party is absolute. It cannot ever seem to change its mind (if, for instance, they perform one of their constant changes regarding enemies during war) or make a mistake (firing an official or making a grossly misjudged supply prediction), for that would imply weakness and to maintain power the Party must seem eternally right and strong. (source)

We are watching narratives being created in front of our very eyes with the Vegas massacre. Every time something terrible happens, there’s a spin and that spin a) keeps us in the dark. b) encourages us to be dependent, and c) benefits someone.

But….WHY????

So why the vast effort to expunge tales of mayhem and to make it seem like our own national disasters really weren’t that bad? There are a few reasons, like pandering to an audience that wants to be blissfully unaware, but primarily, it’s about control.
Those who live a self-sufficient lifestyle are a threat to the status quo that those in power would like to see.  If you don’t NEED them, then there is no leverage to force you into compliance.  You don’t NEED to go to Camp FEMA in order to have 3 squares a day.  You don’t NEED to give up your guns in order to have a roof over your head and government supplied security.  You don’t NEED to get some kind of chip implanted in your arm to be scanned in order to receive “benefits” like medical care, food, and even money.
Self-sufficiency means freedom.  When you can feed yourself, clothe yourself, shelter yourself, and protect yourself, you are far less likely to need to cede your freedoms in order to stay alive. And in a police state that is frantically trying to withdraw our constitutional rights, this just won’t do.  They need leverage.
So the establishment has created a narrative that tells us what we are doing is silly and unnecessary.  They are rewriting history even though we only lived that history in the past decade.  Even though we know the truth of the matter because we watched it live, they are changing the facts to make us doubt our own perceptions. They are catering to the people who have no interest whatsoever in taking care of themselves.
This narrative was created to make a society of anti-preppers – of people who believe that all will be right with the world, the government is kind and benevolent, potential disasters aren’t really that big of a deal, and those crazy preppers are stark raving lunatics.  They want us to be perceived as extremists so that others are less likely to follow our examples. If they need a crazy bad guy at whom to point the finger, all they have to do is call someone a “Doomsday Prepper”. (Remember how poor Nancy Lanza was vilified after the Sandy Hook shooting?)
But…
If this civil unrest is not occurring, why is the National Guard called to keep the peace?  Why are state police riding around on tanks wearing body armor? Why were the guns of law-abiding citizens taken away in the aftermath of Katrina?
SWAT TEAM
Which version of reality are you going to believe?  The one that you actually witnessed or the perverted rewrite that the mainstream media is trying to push upon you?

Remember the things happening right now.

We have recently been hit with disaster after disaster in the United States. The aftermath of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma hit the mainland amidst stories of looters and people standing armed to protect homes and businesses. In the Carribean, lawlessness was rampant, and after Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico, the danger from armed people robbing those who still had some supplies was constant. As I write this, there are uncontrolled wildfires tearing through California wine country, and looters are striking the homes of evacuees.
Of course, we are seeing reports of this now, but later will these stories be “debunked” by “experts” like the stories from Katrina and Sandy?
It’s entirely likely because most people would prefer to live smug in the belief that the police are only seconds away, their neighborhoods are immune to looters and vandals, and that America is a place of exceptional order and civilization. It comforts them to believe these things.  They use it as ammunition so they can scoff at “doomsday” preppers and call them “conspiracy theorists.”
But we know differently, and today, bloggers and alternative media are also documenting these stories before history is erased. I have watched for years as supplemental links in stories I have written have disappeared. I have witnessed the changing narratives, and if you’re reading this, you probably have too.
So, don’t be discouraged in your efforts when you read all the “good news” stories that inevitably show up after a disaster. To be sure, there are some wonderful people out there helping their neighbors, but there is also a dark side that the media prefers to ignore.
You saw it when it was happening. You know the truth, even if the disaster myth narrative would have you believe otherwise.