FORT WORTH, TX — In a regrettable fashion faux pas, two Texans came to a wedding wearing the same gun.
The social awkwardness was apparent right from the get go as the two men arrived together at the venue wearing their formal cowboy wear consisting of big boots, big hats, and big six-shooters.
As they emerged from the same vehicle, it became noticeable right away that they were both wearing the same big showy Colt Single Action Army “Peacemaker” in .45 Colt. Both guns even featured the same nickel-plating and custom engraving of a Texas Star with their own initials.
“Hi Ted! It’s so good to see you! My, that’s a big gun!” said a relative of the bride.
“Everything is bigger in Texas!” Ted replied with a cowboy braggadocio.
“Oh wow! And your friend Tim is wearing the same gun! You see him over there? Did you guys plan on twinning today? That’s so cute!”
“What? No! Uh, of course not!” replied Ted.
“Are you guys together?” asked the wedding coordinator which caused some awkward glances between Ted and Tim.
“Yes! Uh, I mean, no! I mean, we came together in the same car, but we’re not together together!” both stammered out before finding out she was just asking if they were assigned to the same table for the reception.
At publishing time, 18 more people had asked if Ted and Tim were together since they were wearing the same gun.
If you hang out in this hallowed space, you clearly like guns. If you like guns and you don’t live under a rock someplace, you already know the news. President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill”, which recently passed the House, includes a snippet of language that removes sound suppressors from the purview of the 1934 National Firearms Act (NFA). This came about by the bill including Section 2 of the Hearing Protection Act. Trust me, this is a really big deal.
Sound suppressors are not actually silencers, they just make you a more neighborly shooter. In many parts of Europe, suppressors are sold over the counter and are even made mandatory.
I’m not a lawyer. I took civics in high school, but that’s the extent of my practical education on the American legislative process. However, I have been a gun nerd for as long as I can remember. Live in this space long enough, and you start to pick up some things about how the American legislative system works. My mission today is to mine the details and explore a few what-if’s regarding how this could all shake out.
American Governance 101
My source is the Internet, but I have done a fair amount of reading. If I miss a few details, please forgive me in advance. As I said, I’m not a lawyer.
A good suppressor makes shooting more pleasant and less potentially damaging to your hearing. It can also reduce perceived recoil and increase accuracy.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act is House Resolution 1 (HR1) for the 119th Congress. The bill was introduced in the House of Representatives. To become law in America, a bill is debated in one house, tweaked as needed to gain sufficient consensus, and then passed. Then it goes to the other chamber, where the same thing happens.
These two approved bills are usually, by this point, pretty different. A conference committee then hammers out those differences into something both chambers can tolerate, and there is a final vote. If that final bill passes both the House and the Senate, it then goes to the President’s desk for signature. If signed by the President, the bill then becomes law.
A suppressor can actually make it easier to shoot a firearm — especially those with shorter barrels, yet chambered for serious cartridges like this .308 SOCOM 16 CQB. Less blast and noise means more focus.
Passage in the House or the Senate requires a simple majority. However, in the Senate, the minority party can filibuster a bill. The sordid details don’t matter, but when that happens, it takes a 60-vote majority to override the filibuster. The filibuster was originally supposed to be a nuclear option that was used only in extreme cases. In our currently polarized world, the filibuster is seemingly used on a whim. As a result, many things can’t get through the Senate without a 60-vote supermajority.
Republicans currently outnumber Democrats in the House 220 to 212. The Republicans hold the Senate 53 to 47. Those 47 include two Independents who traditionally caucus with the Democrats. HR1 passed 215-to-214 in the House.
A Springfield Armory XD-M Elite pistol with a threaded barrel shown with a suppressor attached.
The consensus seems to be that if your team is in power, the filibuster is a travesty. If the other team is driving, it’s a blessing. The filibuster is one of the biggest reasons so little gets done in Washington these days. However, HR 1 is not a conventional bill. It is a budget reconciliation. Budget reconciliations are immune to the filibuster and pass via a simple majority. That is the only reason we might now see sound suppressors taken off of the NFA. Let me explain.
Details
As I currently understand it, the primary language in HR 1 that concerns sound suppressors simply removes them from the purview of the NFA completely. Should this pass, suppressors would be treated like Title 1 firearms. You would transfer them through an FFL dealer with a NICS check and a Form 4473. That means no more transfer taxes, fingerprints or processing time. More importantly, I believe it should also mean no more national registry of suppressor owners.
A highly accurate Springfield Armory Model 2020 rifle like this one can serve as an exceptional host for a suppressor.
As you can imagine, the opponents are apoplectic over this. Expect them to do everything they can to get this removed in the Senate. It could get better, however. Stuff can yet still be added to this bill once it hits the Senate. Who knows, maybe a 2A-friendly senator manages to get the NFA restriction on short-barreled rifles and shotguns removed so the only thing the NFA would regulate would be machine guns, destructive devices like cannons and grenade launchers, and AOWs (Any Other Weapons). AOWs can be things like handguns with vertical foregrips, guns that don’t look like guns, pistol-gripped short-barreled shotguns, and similar stuff.
Potential Outcomes
This could shake out along a spectrum from bad to awesome. Worst case, all of the gun stuff comes out of the bill and we’re stuck with things just like they have been since 1934 — draconian transfer taxes, scads of paperwork and massive artificial impediments to silencer ownership. If that happens, the legislators who are ultimately responsible for that will earn the righteous ire of tens of millions of thoroughly energized voters.
The 4th British Hussars around 1820
