Categories
All About Guns Darwin would of approved of this! Gear & Stuff

Alaskan Bear Rifles by PHIL MASSARO

When in brown bear country, you need an utterly dependable rifle.

I am recently home from a wonderful hunt in coastal Alaska for both black and brown bears; if you’ve never had the opportunity to hunt the Forty-Ninth state, I highly recommend it. I was hunting with my buddy Bob Jewett of Top Gun Treks (www.topguntreks.com); he is a veteran Registered Alaskan Guide with plenty of experience hunting both kinds of bears. We were on native lands in Tyonek, Alaska, on the north shore of Cook Inlet, where the bears have plenty of food and especially protein. They stay out of hibernation longer and grow larger than their inland counterparts. Bob and his assistant guide Pat Donelson, have guided a large number of clients for Alaskan animals of all sorts, and are well-versed in what it takes to anchor a bear at distances from 300 yards to those measured in feet. Invariably, the conversation turned to rifles and cartridges, and I wanted to get their take on suitable Alaskan bear rifles and compare and contrast them with the choices made by their clients, including Yours Truly.
As Bob told me when preparing for the hunt, there is a big difference between killing a bear and stopping a bear, and in the thick willow and alder jungle of coastal Alaska, you may very easily have a brown bear rear up out of the brush inside of twenty yards, or have one appear at your bear station seemingly out of thin air. “They make very little noise when they circle a bait station, and while the common .30 calibers have been used to hunt them, I personally prefer something a bit bigger,” Jewett related, and I personally agree with him. As you’ll see, I’m not alone in my choice of caliber, as well as the setup of the rifle. Let’s begin with the guide’s rifles, and move onto the client’s.

  1. Bob Jewett’s .338 Winchester Magnum

    Bob Jewett’s .338 Winchester Magnum, a Model 70 Classic Stainless topped with a Leupold Stainless 2.5-8x40mm

I love to look at Professional Hunter’s firearms; they show the rigors of day-to-day hunting life and are often beat nearly to death. While we all have our safe queens, I appreciate those beat up, well-hunted guns that invariably have a story to tell, be it that one shot that even surprised the owner, of those hair-raising tales of dangerous game at close quarters. Bob Jewett’s daily rifle is exactly that, a gun which bears (proudly) the scars of daily use, and has been tested ad nauseam. In terms of being a highly valuable or collectible piece, it probably doesn’t hold a ton of value, but it is an American staple; I had to chuckle because I have the same rifle chambered in .300 Winchester Magnum, and while neither of them is much to look at, they certainly perform.

The .388 Winchester Magnum makes a wonderful choice for all of North America.

Bob’s rifle is Winchester Model 70 Classic Stainless, with the controlled-round-feed configuration and a 26-inch stainless barrel, set in a black synthetic stock. Like my own rifle, Bob’s rifle has a sweet trigger, three-position safety, and hinged floorplate. The pre-’64 style action uses the Mauser-style non-rotating claw extractor, which so many Professional Hunters and experienced clients have come to depend upon. This rifle spends its life in and out of aircraft, boats, and trucks, it’s carried along with frame packs and other assorted gear that a guide is responsible for, and shows it, but is utterly dependable. It is topped with a Leupold Stainless 2.5-8x40mm scope – partially covered in the remnants of camo tape – allowing Bob to handle close-in backup shots on a client’s bear, or to dispatch a caribou at 400 paces. “That old girl has been with me through thick-and-thin. She ain’t pretty, but she shoots.”

With a Leupold 2.5-8x scope, Bob’s rifle can handle all sane hunting ranges

Bob prefers the 250-grain Nosler Partition bullet for his .338; he reported that it has handled a brown bear inside of ten yards, as well as sheep, goats and caribou at respectable distances. He runs a candy stripe of electrical tape up the barrel to minimize glare while out in the field.

  1. Pat Donelson’s .338 Winchester Magnum

    Donelson’s Ruger Model 77 MkII in .338 Winchester Magnum, a sensible, weather-proof Alaskan combination

Pat’s setup isn’t far off from Bob Jewett’s; it’s a Ruger stainless M77 MkII in .338 Winchester Magnum, topped with a Burris Fullfield II 3-9x40mm scope. “When I started guiding, I didn’t have a lot of money to spend on a rifle, and needed something that would not only handle the day-to-day rigors of Alaskan hunting, but could also save my bacon in the thick stuff, or save a client’s trophy at longer distances.”

Topped with a Burris Fullfield II 3-9×40, Donelson’s rifle can handle the day-to-day activities of an Alaskan guide

The guide’s collective choice of the .338 Winchester Magnum isn’t shocking to me, as I’ve long considered it the crossover cartridge between the flat-shooting .30s and the high horsepower .375 H&H. Pat Donelson agreed: “The .338 allows me to get the job done, whether I’m guiding for a distant moose, a ram on the scree slopes, or a caribou across the tioga. Thankfully, I have good clients and I don’t need to shoot it very often, but it has served me very well.”

All the metal on Donelson’s rifle is stainless steel, which will survive in the salty air of the Alaskan coast

 
Pat also like the Nosler Partition bullet, though recently he has begun to use the 225-grain Barnes TTSX. Note that both guides have what many would call “commonplace” rigs – regarding both rifle and optic – and they have performed perfectly.

Donelson (with Ruger Model 77 MkII on shoulder), Jewett, and Massaro checking Alaskan bait stations

  1. My own .404 Jeffery

    A Mark Bansner custom rifle in .404, topped with a Leupold VX5-HD 1-5x24mm, in Talley Rings.

It’s not every day that I have the opportunity to hunt Alaskan bears, and even rarer is the possibility of one of the big coastal brownies. I have more than one rifle that could’ve filled the bill – depending how you look at it – so I thought long and hard about which gun would make the long trek with me. I wanted a rifle that would handle the worst situation first and foremost – a brown bear at spitting distance – and that would also withstand the elements that coastal Alaska has to offer: the salt air, the dust of logging roads, and the intermittent rain showers that frequent the area. To my mind, a synthetic stock and rust-proof metal made all the sense in the world.

The M704 action is a controlled-round-feed design, without the claw-style extractor.

 
For a cartridge, anything equal to or larger than the .375 H&H would be perfect, as shots would generally be inside of 200 yards. I settled on my Mark Bansner .404 Jeffery, as the rifle itself would be perfect for this hunt – Bansner makes a great synthetic stock, and as the rifle began life as a Legendary Arms Works Big Five, all the metal is Cerakoted – and the cartridge has been very good to me on more than one continent, while hunting the largest beasts that walk.

The Bansner custom rifle and the claws of an Alaskan black bear

 
This particular rifle wears a Leupold VX-5HD 1-5x24mm scope, set in Talley detachable rings, and it loves the Norma African PH .404 Jeffery load. Driving a 450-grain Woodleigh Weldcore softpoint to a muzzle velocity of 2,150 fps, for over 4.600 ft.-lbs. of energy, the rifle will print one-MOA groups, so accuracy was no issue. A three position wing safety and the M704 controlled-round-feed action make for a very reliable setup, especially with all the loading and unloading involved with checking bait stations daily.

Phil and Suzie Massaro with an Alaskan black bear, taken with his Bansner .404 Jeffery

 
I didn’t get a shot at a brown bear, but took a very nice black bear boar, and the rifle stood up to the test just fine. As a matter of fact, I became very fond of this rifle during this hunt, and though I own other dangerous game rifles, this will be my Alaskan bear rig. I can quickly switch between the excellent Leupold scope and the rifle’s iron sights, and with this level of horsepower, I feel very confident traversing the willow thickets.

  1. Dan McDowell’s .50 Alaskan.

    Dan McDowell’s Wild West Guns lever-action .50 Alaskan

Daniel McDowell – better known as The Last Frontiersman (www.lastfrontiersman.com) – is an Alaskan fishing guide, born in Alaska before it was a state. He has a lifetime of experiences hunting and fishing the 49th state, including running a set of boats modeled after a landing craft, fully equipped to handle wheelchairs. You see, Dan has done extensive work with paralyzed veterans, putting smiles on many faces while sharing a common interest with those who have sacrificed for our country. Dan is also an accomplished hunter, having hunted Alaska as a resident since his youth; he has an impressive trophy room, including a beautiful black bear that squares over seven feet.

Dan McDowell, the Last Frontiersman, with his favorite bear rifle

 
Dan’s chosen bear rifle is a Wild West Guns lever-action .50 Alaskan, and a sweet rifle it is. It began life as a Marlin 1895GS, rechambered to the big rimmed .50 Alaskan, and outfitted with a peep sight, large lever loop and a MagnaPorted barrel, and converted to a takedown. “I’m on the rivers quite often, and I appreciate the takedown rifle; it fits neatly into its small case, yet has the horsepower to any bear,” McDowell related, “and I’ve come to rely on it.”

The .50 Alaskan – based on a blown-out .348 Winchester – makes a good bear stopper

The .50 Alaskan is based on the rimmed .348 Winchester cartridge (which was the only cartridge offered in the Winchester Model 71), and will drive 500-grain bullets to a muzzle velocity of over 1,600 fps. The quick-handling nature of the narrow lever guns is a definite benefit in the thick coastal regions of Alaska, and when equipped with a peep sight, target acquisition is fast; that’s a good thing when encountering a bear of any color in thick brush. “I love those heavy, wide bullets at moderate velocities, and that large loop fits my hand very well;” McDonell told me, “for hunting coastal Alaska it’s my favorite rifle.”

  1. Doug Warren’s .375 Holland & Holland Magnum

    Doug Warren’s .375 H&H, known as “Bear Medicine”

“Bear Medicine” is the inscription on Doug Warren’s rifle, and rightfully so. The Winchester Model 70 – aptly nicknamed ‘The Rifleman’s Rifle – has been one of the most reliable, dependable and sound designs ever to come out of an American factory. It has many of the features of the classic 98 Mauser, and has served hunters very well since 1936.

No words needed here!

 
Couple those features with a cartridge that is – in the opinion of this author – possibly the single most useful cartridge ever to grace the hunting fields, and you’ve got a recipe for success. Doug’s rifle started out as a Winchester Classic Stainless, but there has been some serious custom work done to it. Doug sent the rifle out to gunsmith Brad Stair for a complete makeover, including cutting the barrel down to 20-inches and re-crowning, installing a Timney trigger, lapping the bolt, bedding the action into a new Bell & Carlson fiberglass stock and Cerakoting the exposed metal. Fiber optic sights were affixed to the barrel, and a Trijicon 1.25-4x24mm scope completed the package.

The Cerakoted receiver of Warren’s Winchester Model 70

 
This rifle loves the 260-grain Nosler AccuBond – a fine choice for the .375 H&H, especially at longer distances – making for a true do-all combination. The .375 H&H may be one of the best choices for big bears, as there are bullets available from 235 to 350 grains, and despite the cartridges inexorable connection with large African game, it is a relatively flat shooting cartridge, especially when mated with a spitzer boat tail bullet. Doug Warren spent years organizing outdoor events for the Paralyzed Veterans of America, bringing a multitude of veterans for both hunting and fishing trips – working closely with both Bob Jewett and Dan McDowell – so his .375 has seen plenty of action. “When I head to Alaska to hunt bears, this rifle gets the nod. It handles bears of all sorts, whether at 10 or 210 yards,” Warren told me. I’ve seen the accuracy of this rifle, and wouldn’t hesitate to carry it myself; it’s a rock-solid piece of gear.

Doug Warren with an Alaskan black bear


 
I saw a common thread among the rifles, with the exception of McDowell’s slick lever gun, in that controlled-round-feed bolt guns were preferred. My own choice was based upon the performance of this style of rifle in the wild places of North America, Africa and Australia, but the other three bolt-action rifles have seen a considerable amount of time in Alaska. The cartridges represent a cross-section of cartridge choices suitable for the largest North American game; there are those that prefer even larger cartridges, such as Phil Shoemaker’s famous ‘Old Ugly”, a Mauser in .458 Winchester Magnum, but I think the .338 Winchester Magnum, .375 H&H Magnum, and the .404 Jeffery (and you could easily substitute one of the .416s) offer enough cartridge for any traveling sportsman headed to Alaska for the largest bears. Both the guides had a definite preference for cartridges larger than .30-caliber, regarding the brown bears, and please realize that when you’re hunting coastal Alaska, you’re in brown bear country, irrespective of what your intended quarry may be.

A trio of Alaskan rifles: a Winchester 70 in .338 Win Mag, a Bansner custom in .404 Jeffery, and a Ruger 77 MkII in .338 Win Mag

Categories
Allies

Something for My Great Readers when it just seems that the world is getting to be too much!

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Cops

FBI Refusing Appeals on NFA Denials

Ammoland Inc. Posted on 

Again and again those of us who simply want to exercise rights supposedly protected by the Constitution find the biggest perpetrators of infringements are its “guardians.”

USA – -(Ammoland.com)- “The FBI has taken the position that it will not allow you to appeal your FBI background check and denial for an NFA [National Firearms Act] Transaction,” attorney Stephen Stamboulieh announced Monday. “Yes, the FBI conducts the background check, denies you, and provides the NTN [NICS Transaction Number] for your denial, but… no appeal for you!”

“[T]he Appeal Services Team (AST) of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division’s NICS [National Instant Criminal Background Check System] Section does not process appeal requests for the NFA background checks,” appellant Kevin Francisco Borquez was told in an unsigned letter from the FBI dated June 12. “We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused.”
“A NICS check is not required on the transfer of NFA items,” Historic Arms, LLC President Len Savage advised (See Section B, item 20 on page 2 of ATF Form 4473 and corresponding instructions on page 6).  “However, the FBI does receive fingerprints and does a more extensive background check that includes use of the NICS prior to ATF NFA branch even beginning the transfer process.”

In the case of NICS appeals, a Freedom of Information Act request submitted by Stamboulieh produced the admission that the FBI “stopped processing front-end [appeals] mail on 11/25/2015.”
In Borquez’s NFA case, he maintains he has wrongly been denied a fundamental right by gatekeepers that got it wrong. And based on their response, FBI bureaucrats apologized but won’t do anything about it except return materials he submitted in his inquiry.

Does failure to tell an inquiring citizen who does process such appeal requests mean no one does?

“I didn’t believe it until I saw the document. I’m not sure how this is legal or proper, but we are looking into it,” Stamboulieh responded. “So basically, the FBI is denying you based on its database, and then wholesale refuses to allow you to appeal it. Smells like a due process violation.”


About David Codrea:David Codrea
David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating / defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament.
In addition to being a field editor/columnist at GUNS Magazine and associate editor for Oath Keepers, he blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

Categories
All About Guns

Sig Sauer Model 220, .45 ACP (The Most Boring & Accurate Pistol That I have ever shot!)

SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 1

SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 2
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 3
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 4
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 5
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 6
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 7
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 8
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 9
SIG Sauer - MODEL 220, .45 ACP FULL SIZE PISTOL, 2 MAGAZINES, SIG LITE SIGHTS, EXCELLENT CONDITION-ACCURATE, POWERFUL - Picture 10

 

Categories
War

life In England just before WWII with the Gas Warfare Scare

Image result for gas mask world war
May this never happen to this Country!

Categories
War

What a waste of fine Infantry!

The Ghosts of the Somme

97 years ago today, nineteen Allied divisions went over the top in an all out assault on the Somme.  When the sun set at the end of the day, 20,000 men lay dead.  Another nearly 60,000 were wounded, many stranded in no-man’s land.
  Stretcher bearers dared the machine gun fire to bring the fallen back to safety and medical aid, earning two of the nine Victoria Crosses awarded that day.  Wounded were recovered for the next seven (!) days from this day’s assault, and then found that there were only 10,000 hospital beds for the 60,000 wounded.

The 1st Newfoundland Regiment had to leave the safety of the trenches 200 yards behind their own front lines, because the closer trenches were choked with dead.  The German machine guns mowed them down: the Regiment suffered 90% casualties in minutes.  Newfoundland may never have recovered from the loss of so many of its sons.
It was said that day that Lions were led by Donkeys. The ghosts of those lions are seen in this astonishing video from the battle.  You see one soldier shot just as he goes over the top.  His body slides back into the trench.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

The Somme was perhaps the most stark example of the futility of the Great War.  By the end of the battle, a million men were dead or wounded.  For this cost, the Allies pushed the front lines six miles towards Germany, a cost of 31 men per foot gained.

This was the day that Europe committed suicide.  It’s been a long, slow motion self-immolation, but that is now fair complete.  Sic transit Gloria Mundi.

Stolen from

Borepatch

Categories
All About Guns

Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope in Caliber 22LR

Now this is what I call a rifle!

Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 7

Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 2
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 3
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 4
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 5
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 6
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 7
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 8
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 9
Kimber Model 82 Super America, Blue 22.25 - Bolt Action Rifle & Leupold Scope, MFD 1983-88 - Picture 10

Categories
N.S.F.W. War Well I thought it was funny!

"T" Bomb

It’s True!

A toilet was used as an aerial bomb during the Vietnam War

 Jack

US Navy photo
SHARE:
On November 4, 1965, some Vietnamese came across a very strange object that looked as if it had been dropped from the sky. Was it a bomb? Well, it had tail fins and a nose like a bomb. But it was white, and shaped like – a toilet?
It was a toilet in fact. It had been dropped by a VA-25 A-1 Skyraider on a mission to the Mekong Delta in South Vietnam. It had come from Dixie Station, an aircraft carrier base in the South China Sea. The plane’s pilot was CDR Clarence ‘Bill’ Stoddard.
As Stoddard approached his target, he began preparations for attack. He read the ordnance (list of weapons the aircraft carried) to Forward Air Control. At the end of the list, he read ‘and one codenamed Operation Sani-flush.’ What was Stoddard talking about?

va25specbomb-0008b
US Navy Photo

 
The story of the toilet drop was told by Captain Clint Johnson, the pilot of another VA-25 A-1 Skyraider. The toilet was a damaged one that was going to be thrown overboard anyway.
But some plane captains decided to rescue it, dress it up to look like a bomb, and drop it in commemoration of the 6 million pounds of ordnance that had been dropped by the U.S. Air Force.
The Air Control team said it made a whistling sound as it came down, and that it had almost struck the plane as it came off. A film was made of the drop using a video camera mounted on the wing.
Just as the toilet was being shot off, Johnson said,’ we got a 1MC message from the bridge, “What the hell was on 572’s right wing?”
There were a lot of jokes with air intelligence about germ warfare. I wish that we had saved the movie film.’
va25specbomb-017b
When the Vietnam War began the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, which had been introduced into the U.S. Air Force in 1946, was still being used.
It was a medium attack aircraft based on an aircraft carrier. There were plans to replace the Skyraider with the A-6A Intruder jet-engine attack aircraft.
Nevertheless, Skyraiders participated in the naval attack on North Vietnam on 5th August 1964, as part of Operation Pierce Arrow. They struck enemy fuel depots at Vinh, where one Skyraider was damaged, and another was lost.
By 1973, all U.S. Skyraiders had been transferred to the South Vietnamese Air Force. The A-6A Intruder replaced it as America’s principal medium attack aircraft.

Categories
All About Guns

The Owen Submachine Gun

Related image
Related image
Related image
Image result for the owen smg
Image result for the owen smg
Related image
Image result for the owen smg
Image result for the owen smgHere is the Designer of this strange looking but effective SMG
Image result for the owen smg
 
Owen, an inventor from Wollongong, was 24 years old in July 1939 when he demonstrated his prototype .22 calibre “Machine Carbine” to Australian Army ordnance officers at Victoria Barracks in Sydney.
The gun was rejected for two reasons. The first was because the Australian army, at the time, did not recognise the value of submachine guns.
The second was the basic construction of the prototype was completely unsuited as a military weapon, especially as it lacked a proper trigger or any safety device, was of small calibre, and the “magazine” was effectively a giant revolver cylinder which could not be exchanged to reload.
Following the outbreak of war, Owen joined the Australian Army as a private.

Private Evelyn Owen Circa 1941

Gen. Sir Harry Chauvel lined up with a group of officers for practice with an Owen gun

Christmas parade in Sydney, 1942

 New Britain, April 1945

 
In September 1940, Owen’s neighbour, Vincent Wardell, discovered Owen’s prototype in a sugar bag.
Wardell was manager of a large steel products factory at Port Kembla. He showed it to Owen’s father who was distressed at his son’s carelessness, but explained the history of the weapon.
Wardell was impressed by the simplicity of Owen’s design. Wardell arranged to have Owen transferred to the Army Inventions Board, to re-commence work on the gun.
The army continued to view the weapon in a negative light, but the government took an increasingly favourable view.
The prototype was equipped with a “magazine” which consisted of a steel ring drilled with holes for .22 cartridges, and this was revolved through the action using the power of a gramophone spring. This arrangement later gave way to a top-mounted box magazine. This better allowed shooting while prone.
The choice of calibre took some time to be settled. As large quantities of Colt .45 ACP cartridges were available; it was decided to adopt the Owen Gun for it.
Official trials were organised, and the John Lysaght factory made three versions in 9×19mm.38-200 and .45 ACP. Sten and Thompson submachine guns were used as benchmarks.
As part of the testing, all of the guns were immersed in mud and covered with sand to simulate the harshest environments in which they would be used.
The Owen was the only gun that still operated after the treatment. Although the test showed the Owen’s capability, the army could not decide on a calibre, and it was only after intervention from the higher levels of government that the army ordered the 9×19mm variant.
During the gun’s life, its reliability earned it the nickname “Digger‘s Darling” by Australian troops and it was rumoured to be highly favoured by US troops. General Douglas MacArthur proposed placing an order for some 45,000.

Production and use

The Owen went into production at the John Lysaght factories at Port Kembla and Newcastle.
Between March 1942 and February 1943, Lysaght’s produced 28,000 Owen Guns. However, the initial batch of ammunition turned out to be the wrong type and 10,000 of the guns could not be supplied with ammunition.
Once again the government overrode military bureaucracy, and took the ammunition through the final production stages and into the hands of Australian troops, at that time fighting Japanese forces in New Guinea.
Approximately 45,000 Owens were produced from 1942 to 1944.[1] During the war the average cost to manufacture the Owen submachine gun was $30.[2]
Although it was somewhat bulky, the Owen became very popular with soldiers because of its reliability. It was so successful that it was also ordered by the United States and New Zealand.
 New Zealanders fighting in the Guadacanaland Solomon Islands campaigns swapped their Thompson submachine guns for Owens, as they found the Australian weapons to be more reliable.[4]
The Owen was later used by Australian troops in the Korean and Vietnam Wars,[5] particularly the scouts in infantry sections. It remained a standard weapon of the Australian Army until the mid-1960s, when it was replaced by the F1 submachine gun.

Design

The Owen has a simple blowback design, firing from an open bolt. It was designed to be fired either from the shoulder or the hip.
It is easily recognisable, owing to its unconventional appearance, including the top-mounted magazine, and the side-mounted sight required to allow the firer to aim past it.
The placement of the magazine allows gravity to assist the magazine spring in pushing cartridges down to the breech, which improves feeding reliability.
Another unusual feature is the separate compartment inside the receiver, which isolates the small-diameter bolt from its retracting handle by means of a small bulkhead.
This prevents dirt and mud from jamming the bolt, and makes the Owen a highly reliable weapon. Foreign dirt entering the gun would collect at the back of the receiver, where it will drain out or be expelled through a small opening.
When tested, the Owen gun was able to continue firing despite being dipped in mud and drenched with sand, while a Sten gun and a Thompson also tested stopped functioning at once.[6]
In jungle warfare where both mud and sand were frequent problems, the Owen gun was highly regarded by the soldiers.[7]
To facilitate cleaning, the ejector is built into the magazine, rather than the body of the gun. This allows the barrel to be removed rapidly, by pulling up a spring-loaded plunger in front of the magazine housing.
After removing the barrel, the bolt and return spring are removed in a forward direction, completely dismantling the gun. Like the Sten, and Austen, the Owen had a non-folding wire buttstock, but also had pistol grips.
Two horseshoe magazines were constructed in the field, of 60 and 72 rounds. Little information exists as to the success of these experiments.[8]
In 2004, an “underground weapons factory” was seized in Melbourne, Australia, yielding, among other things, a number of silenced copies of the Owen submachine gun.
These had magazines inserted underneath rather than overhead, and were suspected of having been built for sale to local gangs involved in the illegal drug trade.[9]

Users

References[edit]

  1. Jump up^ Bardwell, James O. (1995). “The Owen Gun”. Machine Guns News (4).
  2. Jump up^ “Submachine Gun Becomes Pistol by Detaching Butt.” Popular Mechanics, November 1945, p. 75.
  3. Jump up to:a b c “Owen SMG (Owen Machine Carbine)”. militaryfactory.com. Retrieved 2013-05-02.
  4. Jump up^ Larsen, Colin R. (1946). “Chapter XII — Guadalcanal”. Pacific Commandos: New Zealanders and Fijians in Action. A history of Southern Independent Commando and First Commando Fiji Guerrillas. Wellington: Reed Publishing. pp. 93–103.
  5. Jump up^ “Kokoda Track Tours – Home”. Kokoda Historical. Retrieved 2012-11-19.
  6. Jump up^ “Owen Machine Carbine vs MP 40 and STEN Submachine Gun (1943)” on YouTube
  7. Jump up^ Barber, Graeme. “Owen and Austen – The WW 2 ‘Aussie’ Machine Carbine Story”Mainland Arms. Retrieved 24 July 2014.
  8. Jump up^ “History of the Owen Machine Carbine (OMC)”. diggerhistory.info. Archived from the original on 13 March 2011. Retrieved 19 November 2012.
  9. Jump up^ Brendan Nicholson, Daniel Ziffer (23 July 2004). “Submachine-guns found in weapons factory”The Age. Melbourne.
  10. Jump up^ McNab, Chris (2002). 20th Century Military Uniforms (2nd ed.). Kent: Grange Books. ISBN 1-84013-476-3.
  11. Jump up^ Scarlata, Paul (20 April 2009). “Small Arms of the Koninlijk Nederlands-Indisch Leger, Part 2”. Shotgun News.
  12. Jump up^ Small Arms (Museum exhibit), SaxonwoldJohannesburgSouth African National Museum of Military History, 2012

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California

I guess they can't handle the Truth!

Image result for they can't handle the Truth! Sorry I just could not resist posting this meme! Grumpy

Ministry of Truth: California Bills Would Create Fake News Advisory Commission

California Democrats author numerous ‘Fake News’ bills
 
 
Democrat California lawmakers are pushing legislation to create jack-boot agents of government through a “Fake News Advisory Council” – an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’ for the news they don’t like.

After having my Capitol Press Credential revoked in 2015 and only reissued after an Open Records Act request of 10-years of press credential applications, and viable threats of a First Amendment lawsuit, it appears Democrats in the California Legislature still don’t believe in making no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.
Several of the proposed “fake news” bills say, “There is evidence to suggest that the dissemination of ‘fake news’ through social media influenced the outcome of the 2016 U.S. Presidential election,” as justification for attempting to create a government control of the media.
The ultimate plan is to expand beyond this unelected “advisory council” to create actual legislation authorizing state government to make this determination.
I know this because the original language in SB 1424 said just that: “This bill seeks to rein in the spread of false information through social media… putting the government in the position of determining what is or is not “false information…”, …and because I wrote about this in April.
In my article, Dem Sen. Richard Pan New Bill to Force News Sites to Use ‘Fact-Checkers, I explained: “Sen. Richard Pan (D-Sacramento) is the author of the “Online False Information Act,” a new bill that would require anyone who posts any news on the Internet to verify all information through ‘fact-checkers.’ Sen. Pan does not name who these ‘fact checkers’ are, but I’m sure the State of California will create a new unelected body of elite state employees to oversee this.
“Sen. Pan’s bill would ‘require social media Web sites to disclose their ‘strategic plan to mitigate the spread of false information’” (to the California Ministry of Truth?), the first bill analysis explained.
Apparently this sounded just a little too authoritarian for some Democrat committee staffers writing the analyses, so Pan accepted amendments with the understanding that eventually this advisory board would lead to legislation allowing the state to determine what news is fake or not.
Americans are already experiencing censorship on Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. “Censored! How Online Media Companies Are Suppressing Conservative Speech” exposes how these major tech companies work with groups that hate the right — such as the Southern Poverty Law Center.
The State of California Ministry of Truth
Today, as amended, SB 1424 “Would require the Attorney General, not later than April 1, 2019, to establish an advisory committee to study the problem of false information on Internet-based social media platforms and to make recommendations.”
This attempt to push state-authorized news media is not limited to California’s Bolsheviks lawmakers. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee signed a bill this year that directs schools to create a policy showing how they will implement media literacy instruction in schools. The law also calls for a survey to learn how educators are already teaching news and media literacy.
Sen. Hannah Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara), another Orwellian authoritarian, has authored Senate Bill 947 to authorize California’s schools to teach kids how to spot “fake news.” This bill requires the CA Superintendent of Public Instruction, by December 1, 2019, and with yet another unelected advisory committee, to identify best practices and recommendations for instruction in digital citizenship, Internet safety, and media literacy.
A similar California bill was introduced in January 2018 and has already passed the state Senate with no Republican votes. SB 830 by Sen. Bill Dodd (D-Santa Rosa) would establish the Instructional Quality Commission as another advisory board to the State Board of Education, and requires this new body to develop, adopt, modify, or revise, a model curriculum in media literacy. It requires the model curriculum to address, but not be limited to, the instruction of students in how to:

  1. a) Safely and responsibly use and consume media, b) Access relevant and accurate information through media, c) Analyze media content in a critical way, d) Evaluate the comprehensiveness, currency, relevance, credibility, authority, and accuracy of media content.

According to the legislation, the state’s Instructional Quality Commission would develop a model curriculum and create a list of resources and materials for teachers. It appears the commission is made up of some really radical teachers and “educators” throughout the state.
Some dubious organizations, the Media Literacy Now and Common Sense Kids Action, have been working to craft model legislation, inspired by the Washington State law, to make it easier for other states to adopt the same approach. (Former Senate President Darrell Steinberg (D) is on the board of directors of Common Sense Kids.) Media Literacy Now says its mission is “To spark policy change in every state and at the national level to ensure all K-12 students receive comprehensive media literacy education and skills.”
If memory serves, this is what public schools used to do before the left took over and started feeding our kids a steady diet of leftist pabulum.
“We will use the vehicle of legislation to raise awareness, ignite passion and generate action,” Media Literacy Now says.
Brookings Institute article on How To Combat “fake news” addresses the same. It is no coincidence that state Legislatures, and lefty think tanks only started caring about ridding the country of “fake news” after Donald Trump was elected. “Fake news is generated by outlets that masquerade as actual media sites but promulgate false or misleading accounts designed to deceive the public,” the Brookings Institute says. “When these activities move from sporadic and haphazard to organized and systematic efforts, they become disinformation campaigns with the potential to disrupt campaigns and governance in entire countries.”
“The constantly changing definition of fake news can give candidates and political parties a judicial weapon aimed at preventing the release of disturbing information during an election,” the Brookings Institute concludes.
The French Have a Law – what can I say?
A new French law aims to separate truth from fiction, but it will mostly just give the government more control over the media, Foreign Policy news reports. “The bill proposed by Macron would target a new category of fake news not currently covered by the existing law. Macron proposes rapid intervention to report, identify, and remove fake news by creating new implementations of référé, a special procedure that allows one party to refer a case to a single judge to ask for a provisional order.”

“Fake” Study
False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and Satirical ‘News’ Sources”, was compiled in November 2016, by Melissa “Mish” Zimdars, an Associate Professor of Communication and Media at Merrimack College in Massachusetts.
Included in the “fake news” list is Twitchy.com, truthrevolt.com, Gateway Pundit, The Federalist Papers, The Conservative Treehouse, The Blaze, Red State, Red County, Powerline blog, Pamela Geller, Lew Rockwell, Horowitz Freedom Center, frontpagemag,  DRUDGE Report, Daily Wire, Daily Signal, Conservative Tribune, CNS News, Center for Security Policy, Canada Free Press, Breitbart, American Thinker — all of these news sires she called either “fake, biased, unreliable, conspiracy and/or hate.” (and she calls alternet.org “reliable”)
Melissa “Mish” Zimdars‘ complete fake list is available HERE.
Predictably, many news articles ran with her list under headlines that said: “Here’s a handy cheat sheet of false and misleading ‘news’ sites.”
Why the need for legislation?
Democrats are so unhappy with the outcome of the 2016 Presidential election, the only answer they can deal with over the election of outsider Donald Trump is that most of America was too stupid to understand that fake news was being pushed at them by Conservative news outlets.
According to Sen. Bill Dodd, the author of SB 830, “The prevalence of fake news garnered national attention in the recent Presidential election, where false and misleading stories from hoax websites outperformed actual news stories in terms of social media engagement. This flood of content can make it difficult for the public to differentiate between reputable news sources and false or misleading claims. The practice of advertisements masquerading as news has also seen an increase in recent years.”
 
Supporting the California bills below, but not limited to:
Common Sense Kids Action
American Academy of Pediatrics
California Cable and Telecommunications Association
California School Boards Association
California School Library Association
Center for Media Literacy
Congressman Mike Thompson
Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom
National Association of Media Literacy Education
San Francisco Unified School District
Scientific Literacy Association
University of California, Los Angeles—Teacher Education Program
Yolo County Office of Education
 
Next: Net Neutrality California Style – More Ministry of Truth laws.