

THE 240-YEAR EVOLUTION OF THE ARMY SIDEARM
The weapons that won a revolution and defended a republic.
In late January of this year, the U.S. Army selected a new pistol to replace the Beretta M9, a gun that’s served the Armed Forces for 30 years.
But like every weapon in the U.S.’s arsenal, the Army pistol has gone through a slow evolution, from slow-loading flintlocks that helped create a country to polymer-framed, semi-automatic pistols used in conflicts around the world today.
The U.S. Army has come along way in 242 years.
The Flintlocks That Made America
America’s very first sidearm was a copy of a British one. Based on the British Model 1760, the Model 1775 was a muzzle-loading, .62-caliber smoothbore flintlock.
The American pistols were made by the Rappahannock Forge in Virginia (pictured above), a key manufacturing base and arsenal for the Continental forces that produced 80,000 muskets during the American Revolution.
Copies of the Model 1775 pistol were later made at Harper’s Ferry. This gun was renamed the Model 1805 and was the weapon choice during the War of 1812.
After the Revolution, Connecticut gunmaker Simeon North won a contract to manufacture a new pistol. Based on French pistols of the period, North’s new weapon was smaller than the earlier 1775 model with a side-mounted ramrod and a fired a larger .72-caliber ball.
In 1813, North received another contract for 20,000 pistols from the U.S. Military. These were to have a full stock, fire a .69-caliber ball and most importantly use interchangeable parts, one of the first contracts to request such a feature.
Having these pistols could sometimes mean the difference between life and death. During the War of 1812 while fighting Tecumseh’s Shawnee warriors, Colonel Richard Johnson was wounded in the arm.
Although the veracity of this account is still debated, one story says that Johnson barely had time to cock his flintlock pistol and shoot Tecumseh, a native leader “of undoubted bravery.” Johnson would capitalize on the episode, launching his career as a politician and becoming the ninth U.S. vice president.
North continued to make pistols, manufacturing the Model 1826 for the Navy. The last U.S. flintlock pistol came in 1836, the same year Samuel Colt patented his revolutionary new revolving pistol. Gunsmith Asa Waters produced the Model 1836 until the early 1840s, a weapon used widely during the Mexican-American War.
For almost a century the flintlock had been the dominant ignition system for firearms, but being susceptible to the elements.
They were too unreliable and by the 1840s many of the major European powers, like Britain and France, began transitioning away from increasingly obsolete flintlock pistols to new percussion-lock pistols.
These new guns used fulminate of mercury percussion caps to ignite the gunpowder instead of a flint. The U.S. used the old flintlock system throughout the 1830s and 40s before slowly transitioning to the new percussion cap revolvers.
The Birth of the Revolver
Formally adopted in 1848, percussion revolvers represented a massive leap forward in firearms technology. It’s most basic improvement was simple math— a soldier now had six shots before reloading rather than only one.
But the firepower of these new pistols was also highly sought after, and revolvers became one of the most iconic weapons of America’s bloodiest conflict.
The U.S.’s first revolver was the Colt Dragoon, initially designed for the Army’s Regiment of Mounted Rifles. The Dragoon improved on the earlier Colt Walker, a gun used heavily during the Mexican-American War. The Dragoon would be the first of a series of Colt pistols used by the U.S. throughout the 19th century.
Then came the Civil War, and a plethora of percussion revolvers were soon found their way into the hands of Union and Confederate soldiers alike.
The Union predominantly issued Colt and Remington revolvers. Approximately 130,000 .44-caliber, Colt Army Model 1860s were purchased along with considerable numbers of Colt 1851 and 1861 Navy revolvers.
Following a fire at Colt’s Connecticut factory in 1864, the Army placed significant orders for Remington Model 1858 pistols to fill the gap.
The solid-frame Remington was arguably a better, more robust pistol than the open-frame Colt revolvers. Remington continually improved the Model 1858 based on suggestions from the U.S. Army Ordnance Department.
For both sides pistols were often a soldier’s last line of defense. One Confederate newspaper reported that a badly wounded captain commanding a battery of artillery at the Battle of Valverde “with revolver in hand, refusing to fly or desert his post… fought to the last and gloriously died the death of a hero.”
On the other side of the frontline, one Union calvaryman recalled:
“I discharged my revolver at arm’s length at a figure in gray and he toppled onto the neck of his mount before being lost in a whirl of dust and fleeing horses… I found that both my pistols were emptied… there were five rebels who would not trouble us anymore and many others who must have taken wounds.”
It was not uncommon for cavalry to carry multiple revolvers, as another Union cavalryman wrote “we were all festooned with revolvers. I carried four Colts, two in my belt and two on my saddle holsters but this was by no means an excess. Some of my compatriots carried six because we were determined in a fight not to be found wanting!”
The industrial might of the North ensured that the Union had an advantage throughout the war, and the Confederacy were forced to use imported pistols from Europe and locally produced copies.
These included Adams, LeMat and Kerr pistols and copies of Colts and other revolvers made by Spiller & Burr and Griswold & Gunnison.
By the end of the Civil War, self-contained metallic cartridges were becoming more and more popular. The late 1860s and early 1870s saw another small arms revolution with percussion pistols giving way to cartridge revolvers like the Smith & Wesson Model 3 and the legendary Colt Single Action Army.
The Gun of the West
In 1870, the military purchased its first metallic cartridge revolvers from Smith & Wesson. The Model 3 was a top-break revolver, meaning the barrel and cylinder could be swung downwards to open the action and allow the user to quickly reload the weapon.
The new metallic cartridges removed the need for loose powder and percussion caps and greatly increased the revolver’s rate of fire with a skilled shooter firing all six-rounds in under five seconds. However, Colt, Smith & Wesson’s principal rival, were not far behind.
In 1871, Colt introduced their first cartridge revolver, the year after a patent held by Smith & Wesson expired. Colt turned to William Mason, the experienced engineer who had worked on Colt’s earlier pistols.
Mason designed a pistol which outwardly resembled many of Colt’s earlier revolvers, but the new design included a rear loading gate and Mason’s patented extractor rod offset to the side of the barrel, a feature later used in the Single Action Army.
The Colt 1871 “Open Top” was chambered in the popular .44 Henry rimfire cartridge. When the Army tested Colt’s new pistol, they complained that the .44 rimfire round was too weak and that the open-top design wasn’t as robust as rival pistols from Remington and Smith & Wesson. The Army demanded a more powerful cartridge and a stronger solid frame.
Colt quickly obliged producing a run of three sample pistols for testing and examination. This new revolver was the prototype for the now legendary Colt Single Action Army.
The new pistol, developed by William Mason and Charles Brinckerhoff Richards, had a solid frame and fired Colt’s new .45 caliber center-fire cartridge. This gun is still manufactured today.
After successful testing, the Army adopted Colt’s revolver as the Model 1873. The new Colt Single Action Army had a 7.5 inch barrel and weighed 2.5lbs, and an initial order for 8,000 M1873s replaced the Army’s obsolete Colt 1860 Army Percussion revolvers.
The Army also ordered a several thousand Smith & Wesson Model 3s.
These revolvers had a more advanced top-break design and could be loaded much faster than the Colt. For a number of years, the two revolvers served side by side but used different ammunition.
Eventually, the army favored the more robust, accurate, and easier to maintain Colt, and over the next 20 years purchased more that 30,000 of them.
TheColt M1873 Single Action Army would go on to see action in every U.S. military campaign between 1873 and 1905. They were even clutched in the hands of General Custer and his men at the Battle of the Little Bighorn.
Despite its hallowed status, the Single Action Army still wasn’t the apex of handgun technology. While the Single Action Army had excellent stopping power, reliability, and a simple action, it was slow to reload and a slow rate of fire.
To address some of these issues, the Army requested a new double action revolver. The Colt Model 1892 became the first double-action revolver ever issued to the U.S. Army and Navy. Replacing the venerable .45-caliber Colt M1873, the M1892 had a six-chamber cylinder and fired a new .38 Long Colt round.
It had a double-action trigger which improved the pistol’s rate of fire, and unlike the earlier single action Colt, the new revolver chambered, cocked, and fired a round with each pull of the trigger.
Another improvement over the earlier Colt was the M1892’s swing out cylinder, this allowed troops to quickly extract spent cases and reload much faster than the M1873’s hinged loading gate.
While the pistol proved sturdy and reliable in the field, now with a faster rate of fire and easier reload, the Army found that the .38-caliber cartridge lacked the stopping power of the previous .45-caliber Colt.
In 1905, during the Philippine Insurrection a prisoner, Antonio Caspi, attempted to escape and was shot four times at close range with a .38 pistol—he later recovered from his wounds.
Although Colt tried to increase the power of the .38-caliber round, the Army began looking for a new pistol that would chamber the .45 Colt round, and in 1904, the Board of Ordnance began a series of tests to discover what sort of ammunition its next service pistol should use.
The Colt Pistol and a World at War
It would fall to Colonel John T. Thompson (who later designed the iconic Thompson submachine gun) and Major Louis Anatole LaGarde of the Army Medical Corps to investigate the effectiveness of various calibers.
Thompson and LaGarde decided that testing on live cattle and on donated human cadavers would be a suitably scientific method of finding which bullet would put a man down.
The experiments were pseudo-scientific at best and horribly cruel to the animals, especially since they would time how long it would take for them to die.
But finally, the report concluded:
“After mature deliberation, the Board finds that a bullet which will have the shock effect and stopping power at short ranges necessary for a military pistol or revolver should have a caliber not less than .45.”
The Thompson-LaGarde tests were followed by Army trials between 1906 and 1911. The trials tested nine designs, but the competition quickly identified three main contenders. The Savage 1907, designed by Elbert Searle, faced Colt’s John Browning-designed entry and the iconic Luger designed by Georg Luger.
All three pistols were chambered in the new .45 ACP cartridge. In 1908, the Luger withdrew from the trials, leaving only the designs from Colt and Savage.
While both pistols had their problems during the trials, the Savage 1907 pistols were substantially more expensive.
The testing reported a catalogue of issues including a poorly designed ejector, a grip safety which pinched the operator’s hand, broken grip panels, slide stop and magazine catch difficulties, deformed magazines, and a needlessly heavy trigger pull.
During this time, the Colt 1905 Military Model went through a series of changes and design improvements, eventually giving it the edge over its rival. Following final testing on March 3, 1911, the trials board reported: “Of the two pistols, the Board is of the opinion that the Colt is superior, because it is the more reliable, the more enduring, the more easily disassembled, when there are broken parts to be replaced, and the more accurate.”
Colt’s pistol was quickly adopted as the ‘Pistol, Semi-automatic, .45 caliber, Model 1911’.
John Browning’s iconic M1911 used a locked breech, short-recoil action, feeding from a seven round magazine.
It weighed 2.4lbs (1.1kg) unloaded and was just over eight inches long. Ergonomically, its controls were easy to manipulate and included magazine and slide releases and both a manual and grip safety.
The M1911 remained in service for over 70 years and saw action during both World Wars, the Banana Wars, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the Invasion of Grenada.
Perhaps one of the most famous uses of the M1911 came when Alvin York was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor.
In October 1918, during the battle of Meuse-Argonne, York was charged by a squad of Germans. As they came into pistol range, York drew his M1911 and killed six attackers. That day he single handedly killed a total of 25 German soldiers and captured 132 more.
In 1926, after some lessons learned during World War One, Colt overhauled the M1911 by including a shorter trigger and frame cut-outs behind the trigger, a longer spur on the pistol grip safety, an arched mainspring housing, a wider front sight, and a shortened hammer spur.
Following these changes, the pistol was designated the M1911A1, a weapon that would also fight a world war—just like its predecessor.
A More Modern Weapon
The Colt soldiered on into the 1980s until the U.S. launched the Joint Service Small Arms Program, which aimed to select a new pistol that could be used by all of the armed services.
After a tough competition between designs from Colt, Walther, Smith & Wesson, Steyr, FN, and SIG, a winning design was selected, the Italian Beretta 92. The Beretta formally replaced the M1911A1 in 1986 as the M9.
Even though the military had found its new gun, the 1911 still remains in use by some units such as the U.S. Marine Force Recon Units and Special Operation Command as the refurbished M45, surpassing a century of service.
But the M9 beat out the venerable Colt because it fired the smaller 9x19mm round, which made learning to shoot easier, and it had a much larger magazine holding 15 rounds while using a single-action/double-action trigger. While some complained it lacked the 1911’s .45 ACP stopping power, the M9 served the U.S. military well for over 30 years.
It has seen hard service during the Gulf War, the War in Afghanistan, and the Iraq War.
In March 2003, during Operation Iraqi Freedom Marine Corporal Armand E. McCormick was awarded the Silver Star when he drove his vehicle into an Iraqi position before dismounting and clearing enemy defenses with his M9.
But as technology advanced and new pistol designs emerged, the Army needed a new sidearm to match the times. In the early 2000s, a series of trials led eventually to the Modular Handgun System program.
The Army wanted a lighter, more adaptable pistol which could be fitted to individual soldiers. After several years of testing entries from Glock, Beretta, FN, and Smith & Wesson, the SIG P320 won out.
The new pistol, designated the M17, is lighter, more compact, has a standard 17-round magazine capacity, and is fully ambidextrous. It has a fiberglass-reinforced polymer frame with an integrated Picatinny rail to allow lights and lasers to be mounted, much like the M9’s slide-mounted manual safety.
But the most innovative aspect of the M17 is its modular design. The pistol’s frame holds an easily removable trigger pack, which along with the barrel and slide, can be removed and simply dropped into another frame.
This gives troops in different roles with different requirements some much needed flexibility.
The SIG P320 is completely unrecognizable from M1775, held in the hands of American founding fathers. Much like America itself, the soldiers’ handgun has evolved massively over the last 240 years, but the principle of the sidearm remains the same—the absolute last line of defense.
Wars may not be won with pistols, but a soldier’s sidearm can still be the difference between life and death.
Editor’s note: Even when you have a map and compass, and even when you’re following marked trails, it’s possible to take a wrong turn, head in the wrong direction, stray from your intended path and destination, and become lost when trekking in the wilderness. Following the tips below from FM 21-76: Survival, an Army field manual published in 1957, will help you stay on course. (Note that a few of the tips apply specifically to soldiers who need to avoid attracting the attention of potential enemy combatants in the area; however, most apply equally to all hikers and explorers.)
Keeping a Course
When clouds obscure the sun or stars, you need other methods to help you maintain your direction.
a. In strange country, study outstanding terrain features as you travel, and concentrate on keeping your course. Climb to a high point and look at the general pattern of the land, character of the vegetation, the drainage patterns, and the trend of mountains and ridges. Choose a prominent landmark that you can see while you travel. As you near this landmark, line up another one.
b. If you are traveling in a dense forest, you probably won’t be able to spot distant landmarks. You can hold a course by lining up two trees forward of your position in your direction of travel. As soon as you pass the first one, line up another beyond the second. You might find it helpful to look back occasionally to check the relative positions of landmarks or ground slope and contour.
c. You can usually use streams, ridges, and trees as guides in open country and as a means of retracing your route. On overcast days, in areas where the vegetation is dense, or whenever the country appears the same, mark your route with bent bushes, rocks, or notches cut in tree trunks. Make bushmarks by cutting vegetation or bending it so that the under and lighter side of the leaves is facing upward. These signs are especially conspicuous in dense vegetation but should be used with discretion because the risk of discovery involved in plainly marking your route.
d. Even if you have a map, don’t guide too confidently on manmade features or landmarks that are likely to change. The only safe landmarks are natural features such as rivers and hills. In the jungle, for example, when a village site marked on a map is investigated, it will often be an overgrown clearing. Similarly, one rainy season can change the course of a small stream or close an unused trail with dense shrub.
e. Guide on trails that lead in your general direction, and when you come to a fork, guide on the path that appears most traveled: If you guide on the wrong trail and find yourself lost, stop and try to remember the last time that you were sure of where you were. Mark your location and start “back tracking.” Sooner or later you will discover a recognizable feature with which you can pinpoint your position.
f. Travel at night is safe in the desert or open country, but not advisable in strange, wooded country. However, if you do travel at night, use a shielded light only when necessary to find your way over rough, dangerous spots, or to read a map or compass. Your eyes adjust to the darkness; a light blinds you to all but a small area that is illuminated. You can keep a fairly accurate course for short distances in open country by picking a bright star near the horizon (guide star) in your line of travel and lining it up with trees and other skyline landmarks ahead. Be sure you check your direction frequently with the North Star or Southern Cross and change your guide star accordingly.
g. You might have to detour frequently in rough country. Use the following methods to get back on your course:
(1) In short detours, estimate the distance and average angle of departure. On your return, gauge the angle and distance so as to strike your line again. For greater accuracy, count paces and use a compass (fig 7).

(2) Select a prominent landmark ahead and behind your line of travel. On return from your detour, walk until you are again “lined up” on the two landmarks; then follow your original course (fig 8).

(3) An easy way to compensate is by paces and right angles, although it requires more walking (fig 9).

SELECTING YOUR ROUTE ON THE GROUND
Study the Terrain
The route that you select to travel depends upon the situation in which you find yourself, the weather conditions, and the nature of the terrain. Whether you select a ridge, stream, valley, coastline, dense forest, or mountain range to follow, be sure it is the safest, rather than the easiest way. Experience has proved that the most difficult route is frequently the safest.
Following a Ridge
A route along a ridge is usually easier to follow than one through a valley. Game trails are frequently on top of ridges and you can use them to guide your travel. Also you find less vegetation, frequent high points for observing landmarks, and few streams and swamps to ford.
Following Streams
Using a stream as a route is of particular advantage in strange country because it provides a fairly definite course and might lead to populated areas; it is a potential food and water source and a vehicle for travel by boat or raft. However, be prepared to ford, detour, or cut your way through the thick vegetation lining the stream. If you are following a stream in mountainous country, look for falls, cliffs, and tributaries as check points. In flat country streams usually meander, are bordered by swamps, and are thick with undergrowth. Travel on them provides little opportunity to observe landmarks.
Following Coast or Shorelines
If you decide to follow a coastline you can figure on a long roundabout route. But it will be a good starting line, an excellent baseline from which to get your bearings, and probably a source of food.
Through Dense Vegetation
a. With practice you can move through thick undergrowth and jungle fairly silently by cautiously parting the vegetation to make your way.
b. Avoid scratches, bruises, and loss of direction and confidence by developing “jungle eye.” Disregard the pattern of trees and bushes directly in front of you. Focus your eyes beyond your immediate front, and rather than looking AT the jungle, look THROUGH it. Stoop occasionally and look along the jungle floor.
c. Keep alert. Move slowly and steadily in dense forests or jungles, but stop periodically to listen and take your bearings. You cover more territory, and birds and animals do not reveal your position by their cries.
d. Use a bayonet or machete to cut your way through dense vegetation, but do not cut unnecessarily. The noise caused by chopping carries a long distance in the woods. You can reduce this noise by stroking upward when cutting creepers and bush.
e. Many jungle and forest animals follow well established game trails. These trails wind and crisscross but frequently lead to water or clearings. If you use these trails do not follow them blindly. Make sure they lead in your direction of travel by checking your bearings frequently.

f. When you climb a tree to observe or get food, be sure you test each limb before putting your weight on it, and always have a good handhold on something sturdy. Climb close to the trunk because limbs are strongest at this point (fig. 10).
Man Killed By Armed PSU Officers Had Valid Concealed Carry Permit
Two of Washington’s colleagues and at least one witness say Washington, 45, was black.
Keyaira Smith, a witness who took video of the moments leading up to Washington’s death, told OPB that he was “trying to be a good Samaritan” by breaking up a fight.
Video footage shows what appears to be a black object attached to Washington’s right side as he’s seen pulling one man off another. Two PSU police officers can also be seen.
“The gun slipped out of the holster when he had fallen, and I think he may have tried to retrieve it,” Smith said. “Then they said ‘gun.’”
That’s when police fired, she said.
Sgt. Brent Laizure, a spokesman for the Multnomah County Sheriff’s Office, confirmed that Washington had a valid concealed carry permit.
Washington was a Navy veteran and an employee with the United States Postal Service since 1998. He worked with the collections unit as a letter carrier at the main office in downtown Portland, where he also served as the union shop steward.
Washington was married with three kids and one grandchild.
“He loved those kids, he was crazy about them,” said David Norton, president of the National Association of Letter Carriers, Branch 82. Norton knew Washington for seven years.
“He was a big personality. He always had a lot to say. He kind of had a larger-than-life personality. He was always very animated and exuberant. And if you ever worked with the guy or knew the guy, you would never forget him.”
Norton said Washington was with co-workers the day he was shot.
PSU officials are already preparing to defend the university against a lawsuit. Leaders convened a closed-to-the-public executive session Friday afternoon to discuss potential litigation. The session came even as leaders knew little about the victim, other than that he likely wasn’t a PSU student.
Multiple agencies, including the Multnomah County District Attorney’s Office and the Portland Police Bureau Homicide Detail, are conducting an investigation into the incident. PSU and PPB have not officially identified Washington or provided many details about the incident.
University President Rahmat Shoureshi said he’s asked the university’s Campus Public Safety Chief to conduct an internal assessment and evaluation of the incident.
The Portland State University Student Union is calling on the University to disarm campus officers with a rally scheduled for Sunday — the three-year anniversary of when the university first armed Campus Public Safety Officers.The university’s board of trustees cast a controversial vote in 2014 to employ sworn armed police officers on campus.
“Everyone who has expressed dissent over the years to the armament of CPSO and creation of a police force knew that one day this decision would result in deadly violence, and we know that it will continue to happen so long as campus security remain a deputized and armed police force,” PSUSU wrote on its Facebook page. “There’s no way around it – this is how policing works.”
Rob Manning and Amelia Templeton contributed to this report
Some of my thoughts
1. When you are under arms, one must think Tactical at all times.
2. I was not there. But unless the fight is totally out of control. I.E Use of say a use of rock or knife. Or that somebody is completely out of the fighting skill league. It is best to let the Cops handle it.
3. A sad fact is that a lot of Cops today are very trigger happy.
4. While it was admirable & honorable to want to help. One has to remember to weight the cost & risks AT ALL TIMES!
Bottom line-I really feel bad for the family. But later on they can take pride in this incontestable fact. That they had a good man in their family. Who tried to do the right thing!
Grumpy
Guns were everywhere. If you could afford it, it would be shipped to you. In 1884, you could get a rifle to carry on your bicycle. I bet it felt like freedom.
From –Random Acts of Patriotism
Ruger Model 1A .270 with scope.















Thought I forgot huh?






Been there, done that!


![]()














