Categories
Allies HUH! You have to be kidding, right!?!

The world without Europe by Rafael Bardají

This is the sad fate of a continent that has bet on its own demise. It wanted to be the great regulator and beacon of the world but is instead committing suicide homeopathically.
Family photo of European authorities during an event for Ukraine.

Family photo of European authorities during an event for Ukraine.AFP

In recent years (and more recently in the Trump era), strategic and international affairs experts have spent tons of ink and paper trying to predict what the world would be like without America. Diplomatic gurus, prestigious essayists, former political leaders, and reputable publishers have dedicated blood, sweat and money to warn of all the bad things that lay ahead for Europeans when Washington looked the other way, over their heads, or retreated into itself.

Titles like “The Return of the Jungle” or “The End of the West” or “A World Without America” illustrate this trend.

But we have to admit that these attempts at warning and, at the same time, expressions of fear, have turned out to be all wrong. What we are experiencing in Donald Trump’s second term is not America’s retreat into strategic introspection.

Let them tell that to Khamenei or Maduro without going any further. Nor is it strategically a languishing of the West towards irrelevance. Today, America is stronger, richer and better prepared for today’s technological revolution than it was four years ago.

No. What the pundits have been unable or unwilling to see, possibly motivated by their excess of mental Eurocentrism, is the reality of the situation:

It is not America that is leaving the world, it is Europe, in fact, that is leaving it.

Instead of writing about a world without America, it would have been better if they had thought about a world without Europe. They would have better prepared us for the challenges that all Europeans have to face.

First of all, Europe has a serious military problem for which it has no solution: Ukraine. Eager to satisfy Joe Biden, they launched into a rhetorical escalation of support for Zelensky to the end and, logically, of confrontation with the Kremlin, without having the will or ability to deliver on their promises.

Without the United States—and Zelensky knows this well—Ukraine is lost. But E.U. leaders keep talking as if they are ready to launch us into World War III, except that they have neither the weapons nor the soldiers to wage it.

But instead of seeking a de-escalation in rhetoric and accepting the inevitable, that only Donald Trump could force a peace agreement, however painful it might be for Ukraine, Europe continues to jump on the bandwagon of bellicosity, putting fear into its population and painting apocalyptic scenarios but little else.

Secondly, Europe has a very serious social problem that dates back decades but has been especially aggravated by the nefarious decisions of the person who was considered to be the beacon of Europe, Chancellor Angela Merkel.

And that problem has a name and last name: uncontrolled immigration and Islamism.

There is no country or city that does not suffer an increase of an Islamist religious minority and that does not try to impose its rules on traditional European traditions and beliefs.

We see it every day in the crime figures and, very particularly, in the attacks against the integrity and safety of women. But we have also just suffered it this past Christmas with the multiple attacks on Christian symbols and in the places where families usually spend these days, Christmas markets and public squares.

It is not surprising that the new U.S. security strategy warns that if Europe does not change course by 2040, it will no longer be Europe.

Third, Europe suffers from a serious problem of economic and technological backwardness. Instead of being a paradise of development, it has only known how to regulate and regulate until it completely suffocates any hint of innovation.

It is neither in the A.I. race, nor in space, nor in energy. The fight against the big American tech companies and the E.U.’s eagerness to tax them, more a product of its own impotence than of a desire for retributive justice, drives the Old Continent further and further away from the future.

Worse still, the fear of American abandonment, if not disgust at the figure of President Trump, leads to a suicidal embrace of China, as if electric cars from Xi Jinping did not come burdened with totalitarianism and desires for global domination. As long as the E.U. bureaucracy remains the dominant source of industrial legislation, European nations are doomed to fail.

Fourth, Europe is a prisoner of its bad energy decisions and its commitment to the so-called “energy transition,” which was supposed to put Europe at the forefront of decarbonization.

What was never said is that in addition to the trillion-dollar bill for that step, the whole scheme rested on guaranteed access to Russian gas and liquefied natural gas from the Gulf. The confrontation with Russia and the sanctions closed that access and the taxes on hydrocarbons of all kinds threaten the main supplier, Qatar, to stop selling to Europe.

Either the E.U. gives up its ambitious energy agenda or it runs out of energy. There are no other options.

For the moment, it has already backtracked on the ban on combustion cars set for 2030, just around the corner. The allergy to nuclear power fueled by Merkel and the entire European left doesn’t help either.

Finally, Europe has a serious political problem. Having been created as the paradise on earth of freedom and welfare, its continuous problems in making its promises a reality have led to growing authoritarianism, an institutional system that tends to fortify the establishment and to condemn any other option that does not agree with what has been called the “social democratic consensus,” namely less nation, more State, more taxes, more regulation and more social control.

But if all that seemed to be accepted by citizens, it was in exchange for two vital things: security and prosperity. None of that is offered today.

On the contrary, Europeans are becoming less rich and more poor and feel assaulted on their soil and threatened by another foreseeable great war. Without a change in the continent’s political elites, it is very difficult for Europe to emerge from the current impasse.

Unfortunately, E.U. leaders are hellbent on preventing such a change. Hence their growing authoritarianism and their disdain for the deep values of democracy. Spain is a particularly acute case in this area, as its current prime minister has transformed Spanish democracy into a completely hollow shell of values and respect for democratic procedures.

But the United Kingdom is going in the same direction, not to mention France and Germany. People are being arrested for praying in the streetbut only if they are Christians; people are being fined and imprisoned for giving opinions contrary to government policies because any criticism is judged a hate crime, especially if it deals with immigration.

It aspires to judicially eliminate opposition leaders outside the establishment and promotes the illegalization of parties that are not part of the grand consensus born after World War II.

But while this incipient “cold civil war” is taking place, Europe has become invisible as an actor in the rest of the world. It is not a player in the Middle East (for the better); it aligns itself against dictatorial change (see statements on the capture of Maduro or on the Iranian regime); and it believes that by getting cocky in front of its main ally, the United States, it becomes stronger. In Moscow and Beijing, there must be many people laughing loudly.

And worst of all, a world without America would be uninhabitable, but a world without Europe would hardly suffer.

This is the sad fate of a continent that has bet on its own demise. It wanted to be the great regulator and beacon of the world but is instead committing suicide homeopathically, all while the rest of the world yawns indifferently.

Categories
HUH! Paint me surprised by this

Or how to organized for a low density insurrection

Minneapolis has been planning its insurrection for a long time

Through a couple of links on the Internet, I came across this tweet from Insurrection Barbie.  I’ve checked out some of the references she gave, and they’re legitimate.  I’m going to reproduce it in full here, because I think it deserves the widest circulation.

 

Minnesota has spent years building an infrastructure of ICE watch patrols, NGO backed rapid response teams, and politically wired nonprofits that can flip from ordinary life to street mobilization in minutes.

 

The key to Minnesota’s rapid mobilization is not Twitter activism. It is an on the ground surveillance and response network that local reporters have already documented in detail. A Star Tribune investigation into the “organized resistance to ICE” in Minnesota reads like a field manual for modern grassroots intelligence operations.​

 

In south Minneapolis, volunteers spend hours driving what they openly call ICE patrols. Phones are mounted on dashboards. Every sighting of a suspicious SUV, every cluster of federal jackets, is recorded and dropped into Signal and WhatsApp groups that run silently in the background of daily life.​

 

Those chats are not small. A single Spanish language group described by local reporting grew from a few dozen members to hundreds as the federal crackdown began. One message that ICE is at a gas station, grocery store, or apartment complex can draw a crowd in minutes.​

 

Volunteers position themselves near schools, mosques, and high risk housing, phones ready. Their job is to film, warn, and, when they choose, physically interpose themselves between agents and targets.​

 

When roughly 2,000 federal agents arrive in a region that has spent years quietly building an anti enforcement machine, confrontation is not a question of if but when.

The sequence looks like this:

 

  • ICE surge and visible raids trigger heightened patrols and chat activity.
  • A lethal incident happens. Video, rumors, and initial reports hit group chats and local media at the same time.
  • ICE watch networks push urgent alerts, including locations such as the Whipple Federal Building and specific hotels.
  • Within hours, local NGOs and national groups issue public calls to action. Protest times and locations spread across social media and encrypted channels simultaneously.

 

One organization appears repeatedly in any serious look at Minnesota’s anti ICE apparatus: COPAL, short for Comunidades Organizando el Poder y la Acción Latina. COPAL is not just another advocacy group. It runs a formal immigrant defense “rapid response” program that sits at the heart of Minnesota’s ICE watch system.

 

By late 2025, COPAL’s immigrant defense program had trained more than 10,000 people, a staggering number in a single state. Those trainees do not just sit at home.

 

They plug directly into the Signal chats, patrol rotations, and rapid response networks that are now colliding with ICE in Minnesota’s streets.

 

The Vice President of COPAL is a DACA recipient who sits on the Board of Directors as well. His name is Edwin Torres DeSantiago and he has served on the leadership teams for the campaigns of:

    1. Tim Walz
2. Peggy Flanagan
3. Senator Tina Smith
4. Senator Amy Klobuchar

 

He also sits on the Board of Trustees for the College of Saint Benedict and Saint John’s University, showing his integration into elite institutional circles as well as movement politics.

 

They have a direct earmark from leading Democrats.

COPAL publicly credits Representative Ilhan Omar and Senator Amy Klobuchar for securing federal funds for COPAL and partner ACER to develop the Primero de Mayo Workers Center in Minnesota’s 5th District.

COPAL’s own statement thanks Omar and Klobuchar for their leadership and notes that these federal dollars will be invested in worker organizing and community power on Lake Street.

From – Bayou Renaissance Man

___________________________________________________

Stuff like this has me VERY WORRIED for our Republic!

Grumpy

Categories
HUH! I am so grateful!!

The Story of United States Marine Don Adams (Maxwelll Smart)

Categories
HUH! You have to be kidding, right!?!

Money Laundering? – Why Are There So Many Mattress Stores

Categories
HUH!

Useful Shit

Categories
Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom HUH! War

Total War History: The Theodosian Walls

Categories
All About Guns HUH! This great Nation & Its People

Bill Ruger’s Prototype Rifle by EVAN BRUNE, EXECUTIVE EDITOR

Ruger may be celebrating its 75th anniversary in 2024, but the first firearm designed and built by William Batterman Ruger, the semi-automatic Savage Model 99 conversion seen above, came some 10 years before the Standard Model debuted in 1949.

At that time, though he had yet to embark on his career as a firearm designer, he was fascinated by the mechanical nature of guns, and he was especially enamored with the Savage Model 99 lever-action rifle. In Ruger & His Guns, Bill Ruger told author R.L. Wilson about his early exposure to firearms, saying, “I remember seeing them in the store windows, and they looked so beautiful, particularly the Savage 99 and the Winchester lever-action. The mechanics were so artistically designed. They absolutely thrilled me. I associated them with great adventure and great art.”

Ruger returned to the Savage Model 99 as a college student and endeavored to make something more of it. Ruger recalled that the conversion was done “sometime during 1938 or ’39 by the hacksaw and file method” and involved replacing the manually operated action lever with a gas-operated, reciprocating rod that passed through the center of the magazine rotor and cycled the action.

Despite acknowledging some issues with his gun’s extractor, Ruger considered the design to be an improvement over the original Model 99 and offered it to Savage Arms, which turned him down. Ruger later found employment with the Springfield Armory and then Auto-Ordnance during World War II, developing machine-gun prototypes that never came to fruition, but the Savage remained in his mind. In December 1943, he highlighted his conversion in a single-page article for The American Rifleman, concluding that “… after this war, there will be a great upsurge in the popularity of self-loaders, just as there was a great increase in the popularity of bolt-action guns after the last war.”

Ruger’s first commercially successful self-loader came, of course, in the form of a rimfire handgun rather than a centerfire rifle, first advertised in the August 1949 issue of The American Rifleman (seen below), but he kept the semi-automatic Savage. After Ruger’s death in 2002, Bill Atkinson, one of Ruger’s closest friends, was allowed to select a single gun from Ruger’s personal collection. He chose the Savage and immediately donated it to the NRA National Firearms Museum, where it remains on display today.

Categories
HUH! Leadership of the highest kind Manly Stuff Our Great Kids Real men Soldiering Some Red Hot Gospel there! The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People War

One of my few real heroes! General Matthew B. Ridgway

Matthew B. Ridgway stepped into a freezing Korean command bunker in January 1951, looked at a wall map covered in retreat arrows, and made a decision that stunned every officer in the room. The United Nations forces were outnumbered, outmaneuvered, and collapsing, yet Ridgway calmly said the collapse would end tonight. Then he clipped a grenade to his chest harness and walked toward the front.
When he took command of the Eighth Army, morale was broken and casualties were rising.
Officers whispered that the war was already lost.
Ridgway refused to accept it.
He visited wounded soldiers at field stations and asked what went wrong.
They told him leadership had vanished from the battlefield.
He promised to fix it.And he did it the only way he believed in: by showing up under fire.
Ridgeway traveled to front line foxholes where temperatures dropped below zero and Chinese forces attacked at night with overwhelming numbers.
He carried no illusions.He carried grenades, a Bible, and the belief that soldiers follow example, not slogans.
Men said the sound of his boots in the snow changed entire units.If Ridgway appeared at dawn, it meant the line would hold.
He reorganized divisions, replaced timid commanders, and restored the offensive mindset.
When the Chinese launched their Fourth Phase Offensive in early 1951, Ridgway countered with precision.
He ordered tactical withdrawals to stretch enemy supply lines, then struck with concentrated artillery and air power.
His decisions stabilized the front and forced Chinese forces back north, reversing weeks of panic.
President Harry Truman took notice.When General Douglas MacArthur openly challenged civilian authority, Truman relieved him and appointed Ridgway to command United Nations forces.Ridgway accepted without theatrics.
He viewed the job as duty, not spotlight.
Under his leadership, defensive collapse turned into a balanced stalemate that prevented a wider war and saved thousands of lives.
He refused pressure to escalate into China because he understood the cost.
He believed in victory, but never in reckless victory.
After Korea, Ridgway became Army Chief of Staff in 1953, where he argued against expanding conflicts without clear purpose.
He kept a framed note in his office.It read: “No soldier’s life is expendable. No mission justifies waste.”
Matthew B. Ridgway never chased headlines.He chased responsibility.
He took broken armies, broken plans, and broken morale and rebuilt them with presence, clarity, and courage.
Some generals win battles with strategy.
Ridgway won them by showing up where a commander was least expected and most needed.

Categories
HUH!

A very tempting idea!

Categories
HUH!

Anybody know anything about this? Asking for a friend!

OCTOBER 27, 2025: THE DAY AMERICA BECAME AN EMPIRE

The United States just executed the greatest economic coup in human history. 

China controls 80% of rare earth processing—the neurons of every weapon system, smartphone, and AI server on planet Earth. One element: neodymium. Without it, F-35s don’t fly. Teslas don’t move. Data centers go dark. 

Trump threatened to destroy $300 billion in Chinese exports with 100% tariffs. Beijing responded by threatening to choke the global technology supply chain. 

Then something impossible happened. 

THE 72-HOUR CHECKMATE: 

October 24: Malaysia signs mineral pact. 

October 25: Thailand signs processing deal. 

October 26: Framework announced. China blinks. 

Hidden in the fine print: $13 billion Australian rare earth processing. Cambodia extraction rights. Japan’s 2010 playbook—which cut Chinese dependency 30%—now deployed across $350 billion in American AI infrastructure. 

THE NUMBER THAT ENDS GLOBALIZATION: 

US-China trade: $758B (2018) → $578B (2024) 

That $180 billion didn’t vanish. It relocated to nations that bend the knee. ASEAN trade up 20%. Chinese rare earth market share dropping for first time in 30 years. American supply chains rerouting in real-time while Beijing realizes the trap. 

HERE’S WHAT THEY’RE NOT TELLING YOU: 

This isn’t trade negotiation. It’s tribute collection. 

Trump just converted the world’s largest consumer market from a trade partner into a weapon. Every nation now faces a choice: access to American markets, or access to Chinese supply chains. 

Not both. Ever again. 

The $20 billion soybean freeze—first since 2018—isn’t retaliation. It’s a demonstration. China can inflict pain. America can inflict extinction. 

THE PATTERN THAT BROKE REALITY: 

Seventeen times since 2018, identical playbook: Announce apocalyptic tariffs. Markets crater. China retaliates. Then—exemptions appear for allies. Pressure multiplies on Beijing. 

63% of Chinese goods face maximum tariffs. 

Allied nations: 4%. 

Every “chaotic” threat was a calculated bid. Every “impulsive” tweet moved supply chains. Every “Trade War” headline masked the systematic dismantling of Chinese technological sovereignty. 

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT: 

November 1: Xi meets Trump at APEC. 

The deal is already done. Rare earth access for tariff relief. American boots on Asian rare earth facilities. China gets to save face. 

America gets the future. 

Taiwan, AI dominance, technological independence, and the end of competitive multipolarity—all bundled into a “trade framework” the media will call a truce. 

THE TRUTH: Globalization didn’t collapse. It was conquered. 

Source – Rick Tabbott