Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Gun Fearing Wussies

Gun Owners of America Warns Texans About Senate Candidate James Talarico’s Gun Control Record by Jose Nino

 

When Gun Owners of America took to social media to warn Texans about James Talarico, they did not mince words. “James Talarico has opposed constitutional carry, while supporting ‘universal background checks’ & red flag laws,” the organization posted. “Now he wants to represent Texas in the U.S. Senate. Talarico will find out at the polls this November that Texans will never accept tyranny.”

The warning reflects growing alarm among Second Amendment advocates as Talarico, a Democratic state representative from Round Rock, advances toward the November 2026 general election against Republican incumbent John Cornyn. A former teacher who frequently invokes his Christian faith when discussing policy, Talarico won the March 2026 Democratic primary and now stands as his party’s standard-bearer in one of the most closely watched Senate races in the country.

Talarico’s legislative record on firearms leaves little doubt about where he stands. In 2021, he voted against HB 1927, the landmark constitutional carry bill that eliminated the requirement for a License to Carry for adults 21 and older to carry handguns openly or concealed.

On his Vote Smart political courage test, he answered Yes to both “Should a license be required for gun ownership?” and “Do you generally support gun-control legislation?”

In that same questionnaire, Talarico explained his philosophy. “I respect the Second Amendment rights of our constituents and believe that Texas should lead the way in promoting safe firearm regulations,” he wrote. “The uptick of violence — from deadly domestic abuse to suicide and school shootings — our state and nation have experienced is simply due to the fact it is too easy for the wrong people to gain access to guns.

Texans agree we need to make our communities safer through common-sense gun safety measures and greater mental health resources. This means ensuring universal background checks and restricting gun purchases for people convicted of felonies or violent misdemeanors.”

The Freedom Index, which measures legislative fidelity to constitutional and limited government principles, gave Talarico a cumulative score of just 9 percent across his four legislative sessions. In 2023, Talarico voted No on HB 2837, a bill prohibiting credit card companies from surveilling, reporting, or tracking the purchase of firearms, ammunition, and accessories through merchant category codes

Talarico’s most viral moment on gun policy came in May 2023, days after the Allen outlet mall shooting that killed eight people. Texas Republicans brought HB 2960 to the House floor, a bill to loosen gun regulations. Talarico delivered an impassioned floor speech against it.

“We’re the only country in the world that allows this to happen,” he declared. “Globally, we are not an outlier in mental health. We’re not an outlier in school security. We’re an outlier in the number of readily accessible weapons of war in our community.”

He continued, “You can’t offer thoughts and prayers on Monday and then debate a bill to loosen gun regulations on Tuesday.”

After the March 2026 Austin mass shooting on West Sixth Street, Talarico again called for gun restrictions. “We prayed, and God sent lawmakers with common-sense gun safety proposals like universal background checks, red flag laws and closing the gun show loophole,” he stated.

His Senate campaign platform makes his priorities explicit. According to his official website, Talarico supports universal background checks for all gun sales, prosecuting firearms traffickers, safe storage requirements for firearms around children in the home, and raising the age to purchase semi-automatic rifles with military-style features like high-capacity magazines.

Texas Gun Rights described him as “the more dangerous” of the two Democratic Senate candidates in the primary, describing him as someone who “plays the ‘reasonable’ gun control advocate — the type who thinks disarming you is an act of Christian charity.”

TXGR President Chris McNutt’s assessment was blunt, stating, “Anyone — Democrat or Republican — who thinks they can run for office in Texas while supporting a gun confiscation agenda is about to get the political fight of their life.”

Texans who value their Second Amendment rights should take Talarico at his word. His legislative record tells a consistent story.

He opposed constitutional carry and voted against protecting gun owners from financial surveillance.

He supports universal background checks, red flag laws, safe storage mandates, and age restrictions on rifle purchases. Pro-gun organizations such as Texas Gun Rights and Gun Owners of America have all sounded the alarm.

Talarico dresses his gun control agenda in the language of faith and reasonableness, but the policies he advocates would infringe on the rights of law-abiding Texans while doing nothing to stop criminals who already ignore the law.

In a state that enshrined Constitutional Carry into law, Talarico represents the opposite vision, one where the government decides who may exercise their natural right to self-defense and under what conditions. For gun rights to continue to prosper in the Lone Star State, candidates like Talarico must be defeated at the polls

About José Niño

José Niño is a freelance writer based in Charlotte, North Carolina. You can contact him via Facebook and X/Twitter. Subscribe to his Substack newsletter by visiting “Jose Nino Unfiltered” on Substack.com.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Gun Fearing Wussies

The Fits They’ll Throw When They Lose a Gun Case

Categories
All About Guns Gun Fearing Wussies You have to be kidding, right!?!

Virginia Passes Its Assault Weapon Ban

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Gun Fearing Wussies

New Mexico’s Sweeping Gun Ban Dies in the House—But Advocates Warn It’ll Be Back

Gun owners in New Mexico dodged a significant threat when the legislative session adjourned before SB 17 could clear the House. The bill would have banned commonly owned gas-operated semi-automatic firearms, .50-caliber rifles, and magazines holding more than 10 rounds under the broad label of “extremely dangerous weapons.”

It had passed the state Senate 21–17, with all Republican senators and three Democrats voting against it. The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) celebrated the outcome but warned members to stay vigilant—supporters of the ban have made clear they intend to bring it back next session.

Categories
All About Guns Cops Gun Fearing Wussies You have to be kidding, right!?!

Cops Bust Senior Citizen for Homemade Guns

Categories
All About Guns Gun Fearing Wussies

Where NY State Gun Laws Are Headed

Categories
Allies Gun Fearing Wussies You have to be kidding, right!?!

Prohibited Canadian Firearms

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California Gun Fearing Wussies

Nuance: The Real Cost of Owning a Gun in California

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Gun Fearing Wussies

Boeing Bails on Anti-Gun Virginia — And Gun Owners Should Be Paying Attention by Scott Witner

Virginia Gun Bills Surge as Boeing Exits

Elections have consequences. Sometimes those consequences show up fast — like when one of the nation’s largest defense contractors decides it’s seen enough and heads for the exits barely a month after the new governor takes office.

That’s exactly what happened in Virginia this week. Boeing announced it’s yanking its Defense, Space & Security headquarters out of Arlington and heading back to St. Louis — the same division it moved to Virginia in 2022 when business-friendly Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin was making the Commonwealth an attractive place to build things that go boom in defense of this country. Youngkin’s gone now. Abigail Spanberger is in charge. Boeing didn’t need to wait for a second term to read the room.

And here’s the part that should have every Virginia gun owner sitting up straight: the same agenda that sent Boeing packing is the same one coming for your AR, your standard-capacity magazines, and anything else Democrats have decided you don’t need.

Spanberger wasn’t in office five minutes before Virginia Democrats came out swinging with roughly 40 gun-related bills this session. The crown jewel is House Bill 217 — a flat-out ban on so-called “assault firearms,” targeting semiautomatic centerfire rifles equipped with magazines over 20 rounds, folding stocks, or the ability to accept a suppressor. Violators face Class 1 misdemeanor charges. The legislature also advanced a 10-round magazine cap that would instantly criminalize thousands of law-abiding Virginians who currently own perfectly legal standard-capacity mags. They’re also pushing a $500 state tax on suppressors — right after the federal $200 NFA tax was zeroed out. Because nothing says “we respect your rights” like a punitive tax on a hearing protection device.

Let’s be clear about where Spanberger comes from on this. She’s a former volunteer for Bloomberg’s Moms Demand Action. Everytown for Gun Safety dropped $1 million in paid media to put her in the governor’s mansion and personally contacted a quarter-million Virginia voters to make it happen. This isn’t a politician who stumbled into gun control. This is a true believer with a compliant legislature and a pen that’s itching to sign everything Youngkin kept in the trash.

House Minority Leader Terry Kilgore called HB 217 exactly what it is — a direct defiance of Bruen and a blatant attempt to criminalize the most commonly owned rifles in America. He’s right, and the lawsuits will fly. But that’s the point. These people don’t care if their laws get struck down eventually. They want them on the books now, and they want Virginians living under the threat of prosecution in the meantime.

Meanwhile, Boeing is heading to Missouri — a constitutional carry state — where Secretary of War Pete Hegseth showed up at the St. Louis plant to congratulate the workers and call them “patriots that are key elements to ensuring peace through strength.” Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe called it a “win for the heartland.” Hard to argue.

The connection here isn’t subtle. The political environment that makes Boeing decide Virginia is no longer worth the risk is the same environment that looks at a law-abiding gun owner and sees a criminal-in-waiting. Both are targets of the same ideological project. Both are being told that their presence — whether as a defense manufacturer or as an armed citizen — is no longer welcome in the new Virginia.

Youngkin kept the wolves at bay. Spanberger opened the gate. Virginia gun owners knew this was coming. Now it’s here.

Stand your ground, Virginians. The Virginia Citizens Defense League, Gun Owners of America, and the NRA-ILA all have active campaigns running right now. Use them.

Sources:

Categories
All About Guns Cops Gun Fearing Wussies

Gun-Rights Organizations Continue Battle Against DOJ Over 2 NFA Court Challenges by Mark Chesnut

A conglomerate of gun-rights organizations is pushing back hard against the Trump Administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) for its continued aggressive defense of the National Firearms Act (NFA) in a court challenge to the law.

The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and its partners on January 20 filed a response brief in the second of the organization’s two lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the National Firearms Act (NFA) registration scheme, Brown v. ATF. Filed with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, the brief voices the organizations’ opposition to the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case.

As SAF pointed out in a news release on the filing, until President Donald Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the NFA established a $200 tax and registration regime on certain classes of firearms including silencers, short-barreled firearms and NFA designated any other weapons (AOWs), drawing from Congressional authority to levy taxes.

SAF and its partners filed lawsuits challenging the remaining registration requirements because, without the tax, Congress’s reliance on its taxing authority is no longer justifiable.

The DOJ, however, continues to argue in court to keep the rest of the NFA intact, despite no more taxes on the NFA items.

“The passage of the Big Beautiful Bill kicked the already questionable constitutional authority for the NFA right out from under the ATF,” said SAF Director of Legal Operations Bill Sack.

 

“With its actual purported authority now eliminated, the government has resorted to borrowing taxation authority from elsewhere in the statute, or entirely different constitutional authority rarely asserted to justify the NFA. Today’s brief explains exactly why neither tactic is persuasive.”

Alan M. Gottliebe, SAF founder and executive vice president, echoed Sack’s thoughts, adding that the government must stop defending the NFA.

“For the second time this week, SAF and its partners have filed opposition briefs in response to the government’s insistence on defending the NFA,” Gottlieb said. “We’re better situated now than we have been in almost 90 years to relegate significant chunks of the unconstitutional NFA to the dustbin of history. Today’s brief is a major step toward that goal.”

Joining SAF in the case are the American Suppressor Association (ASA), National Rifle Association (NRA), Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), Prime Protection STL Tactical Boutique and two private citizens.

Gun-rights groups are also battling the federal government in the other case Gottlieb mentioned, Jensen v. ATF. In fact, FPC, a party to that lawsuit, said in a recent news release that the DOJ is acting against the president’s promises in defending the NFA lawsuits.

“President Trump promised to end unconstitutional gun control like the NFA, but his DOJ is in court fighting to keep every bit of it,” said FPC President Brandon Combs.

 

“If the Trump Administration is at all serious about restoring the right to keep and bear arms, it should immediately stop spending taxpayer resources to defend unconstitutional laws that treat peaceable gun owners like criminals. The President can end the government’s reign of terror with a call. He should pick up the phone and do it.”