Categories
A Victory! Allies

Idaho Bill Bans Public Contracts For Companies That Discriminate Against Gun Industry By Mark Chesnut

A measure recently introduced in the Idaho legislature seeks to keep companies that discriminate against firearms-related businesses or groups from receiving contracts from the state government.

Senate Bill 1291 was introduced in the state Senate earlier this week. The measure would prohibit public contracts with individuals or companies that are boycotting those that engage in or support the manufacture, distribution, sale or use of firearms, and would also require companies that contract with the state to disclose if their policies discriminate against the firearms industry.

Interestingly, the measure also includes the same protections for a few other industries that often find themselves in the crosshairs of so-called “progressives.”

Per the text of the measure, no company can be granted a state contract if it is engaged in, or plans to engage in, a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company: “(a) Engages in or supports the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy or agriculture; or (b) Engages in or supports the manufacture, distribution, sale or use of firearms, as defined in section 18-3302(2)(d), Idaho Code.”

As the legislation’s language explains, “boycott” means, “without a reasonable business purpose, refusing to deal with an individual or organization, terminating business with an individual or organization, or taking another action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with an individual or organization because the individual or organization: (i) Engages in a particular business sector; (ii) Engages in a particular business sector and does not commit or pledge to meet standards beyond applicable federal and state law; or (iii) Does business with an individual or organization that engages in a particular business sector.”

If the legislation passes, it will be in effect for contracts executed on or after July 1, 2024. As for contracts issued before that date, the legislation states: “Any contract executed prior to July 1, 2024, that violates the provisions of this section shall not be renewed unless the contracting authority obtains the written certification described in subsection (1) of this section.”

The measure will first be considered in the Senate State Affairs Committee.

 

Categories
All About Guns Allies

17HMR Any Good at 100 yards???

Categories
All About Guns Allies

New Channel

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Kinda sad in a way to have to live like that

Categories
All About Guns Allies Gun Info for Rookies

Installing Precision Sights on a Winchester 1885 | MidwayUSA Gunsmithing

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Sunday Shoot a Round

Categories
All About Guns Allies

I like a lot, how about you?

Categories
Allies Gun Fearing Wussies

Is Virginia the Next State to Ban Assault Weapons?

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Chalk Up the First Kill for a 50-Year-Old Gun by STEPHEN GREEN

Courtesy of Paramount Pictures.
“They say that the best weapon is the one you never have to fire,” fictional arms-maker/superhero Tony Stark said in the sales pitch for his Jericho missiles, “I respectfully disagree. I prefer the weapon you only have to fire once.” That was from “Iron Man” way back in 2008, but today’s story is so fresh, the barrels might still be hot.

One of the Navy’s oldest guns was finally fired in combat — and it scored its first kill in its first belated effort.

While Presidentish Joe Biden pretends, among other things, to have us at war with Houthi terrorists who are certainly at war with the civilized world, the U.S. Navy remains on station in the Red Sea for real — defending lives, ships, and property from Houthi predators.

Make no mistake about the danger our sailors face. Houthis might seem like ragtag hordes of criminals, but missile technology has evolved to the point where almost anyone with the means to obtain them can get gear that’s plenty accurate and deadly enough.

A couple of weeks ago, when the Red Sea Missile War had really heated up, Popular Mechanics published a detailed explainer on how the Navy shoots down missiles. Instead of boring my non-nerd readers with all the gory details, let me give you a quick rundown of life aboard a guide-missile destroyer when the missiles start flying.

ASIDE: Naval warfare for the past 50 years or so has increasingly become a contest of missiles vs. antimissile missiles. If the Battle of Midway were fought today, it would take place at greater distances and would be over in an hour or two instead of a day or two.

 

The winner would be determined not by who had the best planes, the best pilots, the best sailors, or the toughest ships, but by who had the best-integrated systems. Kinda takes some of the romance out of the bloody business, doesn’t it?

First, the AN/SLQ-32 electronic combat system (sorry for the gory detail!) has to detect a threat with its extremely sophisticated radar. Then the computer part of the system identifies the threat (“vampire”) and alerts the crew that something wicked this way comes. As the missile gets closer, the long-range radar hands off to the shorter-range SPY-1D.

At about 30 miles out, the ship finally has the chance to fire off two SM-2 missiles to destroy the vampire. If the SM-2 and the backup both fail, then the crew will fire off a pair of short-range Sea Sparrow missiles. Just to be safe, they’ll probably also engage a countermeasure — in this case, a Nulka antimissile decoy.

If all of those somehow fail and the vampire is still incoming, that’s when the Phalanx close-in weapon system (CIWS) kicks into gear. CIWS is a radar-guided Gatling gun that puts out 20mm armor-piercing tungsten penetrator rounds at a rate (depending on the model) of 50 to 75 per second — a veritable wall of steel a vampire must penetrate.

If you think CIWS is an ugly-sounding name, you should see one of the things. The nicest way I can describe one is that it looks a little like R2-D2 sporting an erection. (Now there’s something that’ll break the robo-censors at Google’s ImageFX…)

“In a landmark engagement last week in the Red Sea,” Popular Mechanics just reported, “a U.S. Navy destroyer shot down an incoming Houthi anti-ship cruise missile,” with CIWS for the first time, “suggesting the ship’s long-range weapons systems failed to neutralize the threat.” But that’s only a suggestion since “we don’t know the exact details of the engagement, so it’s unclear if the use of Phalanx over other systems was intentional.”

Until recently, CIWS had never been fired in combat. For that matter, the Sea Sparrow has never been called upon to do its thing, either, because the SM-2 has never once failed in its job to protect its ship at the extreme range. It’s nice that our surface warfare ships have four layers of missile defense but it’s impressive that they’d never before had to go more than one deep.

It’s even more impressive when you consider that the Phalanx CIWS began development in 1969 and was first deployed in 1978. That’s closing in on five decades of sentry duty without ever firing a shot — but was still alert enough to score a kill when asked to do so.

CIWS is the weapon we only had to fire once, and let’s hope the Navy can keep it that way.

Categories
Allies Soldiering War

Battle of the Somme | The Great War | Instruments of Death (Part 1 & 2)