Categories
Allies War

ell I found it interesting! – German veterans form a paramilitary unit after WWII to protect West Germany.

Image result for ww2 german uniform insignia
The Germans were trying to find themselves after 12 years of rule under the Nazi’s.   The communist and socialist parties were having a rebirth during this time, and there were many Germans that joined those groups.
There was a worry about a 5th column assisting the Soviets if they decided to invade especially when the United States earlier had disarmed their military after WWII, then got involved in Korea.
GERMAN VETERANS CREATED ILLEGAL ARMY

Newly discovered documents show that in the years after World War II, former members of the Nazi Wehrmacht and Waffen-SS formed a secret army to protect the country from the Soviets. The illegal project could have sparked a major scandal at the time.

For nearly six decades, the 321-page file lay unnoticed in the archives of the BND, Germany’s foreign intelligence agency — but now its contents have revealed a new chapter of German postwar history that is as spectacular as it is mysterious.

 The previously secret documents reveal the existence of a coalition of approximately 2,000 former officers — veterans of the Nazi-era Wehrmacht and the Waffen-SS — who decided to put together an army in postwar Germany in 1949.
They made their preparations without a mandate from the German government, without the knowledge of the parliament and, the documents show, by circumventing Allied occupation forces.
The goal of the retired officers: to defend nascent West Germany against Eastern aggression in the early stages of the Cold War and, on the domestic front, deploy against the Communists in the event of a civil war.
It collected information about left-wing politicians like Social Democrat (SPD) Fritz Erler, a key player in reforming the party after World War II, and spied on students like Joachim Peckert, who later became a senior official at the West German Embassy in Moscow during the 1970s.
The new discovery was brought about by a coincidence. Historian Agilolf Kesselring found the documents — which belonged to the Gehlen Organization, the predecessor to the current foreign intelligence agency.
While working for an Independent Historical Commission hired by the BND to investigate its early history. Similar commissions have been hired by a number of German authorities in recent years, including the Finance and Foreign Ministries to create an accurate record of once hushed-up legacies.

Kesselring uncovered the documents, which were given the strange title of “Insurances,” while trying to determine the number of workers employed by the BND.
Instead of insurance papers, Kesselring stumbled upon what can now be considered the most significant discovery of the Independent Historical Commission. The study he wrote based on the discovery was released this week.

An Ease in Undermining Democracy
The file is incomplete and thus needs to be considered with some restraint. Even so, its contents testify to the ease with which democratic and constitutional standards could be undermined in the early years of West Germany’s existence.

 Image result for world war 2 german soldiers

According to the papers, German Chancellor Konrad Adenauer didn’t find out about the existence of the paramilitary group until 1951, at which point he evidently did not decide to break it up.
In the event of a war, the documents claimed, the secret army would include 40,000 fighters. The involvement of leading figures in Germany’s future armed forces, the Bundeswehr, are an indication of just how serious the undertaking was likely to have been.
Related image
Among its most important actors was Albert Schnez. Schnez was born in 1911 and served as a colonel in World War II before ascending the ranks of the Bundeswehr, which was founded in 1955.
By the end of the 1950s he was part of the entourage of then Defense Minister Franz Josef Strauss (CDU) and later served the German army chief under Chancellor Willy Brandt and Defense Minister Helmut Schmidt (both of the SPD).
Statements by Schnez quoted in the documents suggest that the project to build a clandestine army was also supported by Hans Speidel — who would become the NATO Supreme Commander of the Allied Army in Central Europe in 1957 — and Adolf Heusinger, the first inspector general of the Bundeswehr.Image result for Kesselring
Kesselring, the historian, has a special connection to military history: His grandfather Albert was a general field marshal and southern supreme commander in the Third Reich, with Schnez as his subordinate “general of transportation” in Italy. Both men tried to prevent Germany’s partial surrender in Italy.
In his study, Kesselring lets Schnez off easily: He doesn’t mention his ties to the right-wing milieu, and he describes his spying on supposed left-wingers as “security checks.”
When asked about it, the historian explains that he will deal with these aspects of the file in a comprehensive study in the coming year. But the BND has recently released the “Insurances” files, making it possible to paint an independent picture.
The army project began in the postwar period in Swabia, the region surrounding Stuttgart, where then 40-year-old Schnez traded in wood, textiles and household items and, on the side, organized social evenings for the veterans of the 25th Infantry Division, in which he had served. They helped one another out, supported the widows and orphans of colleagues and spoke about times old and new.

Fears of Attack from the East
But their debates always returned to the same question: What should be done if the Russians or their Eastern European allies invade? West Germany was still without an army at the time, and the Americans had removed many of their GIs from Europe in 1945.
At first, Schnez’ group considered allowing themselves to be defeated and then leading partisan warfare from behind the lines, before relocating somewhere outside of Germany.
In the event of a sudden attack from the East, an employee with the Gehlen Organization would later write, Schnez wanted to withdraw his troops and bring them to safety outside of Germany. They would then wage the battle to free Germany from abroad.
To prepare a response to the potential threat, Schnez, the son of a Swabian government official, sought to found an army. Even though it violated Allied law — military or “military-like” organizations were banned, and those who contravened the rules risked life in prison — it quickly became very popular.
The army began to take shape starting at the latest in 1950. Schnez recruited donations from businesspeople and like-minded former officers, contacted veterans groups of other divisions, asked transport companies which vehicles they could provide in the worst-case scenario and worked on an emergency plan.
Anton Grasser, a former infantry general who was then employed by Schnez’ company, took care of the weapons.
In 1950, he began his career at the Federal Interior Ministry in Bonn, where he became inspector general and oversaw the coordination of German Police Tactical Units in the German states for the event of war. He wanted to use their assets to equip the troop in case of an emergency.
There is no sign that then Interior Minister Robert Lehr had been informed of these plans.
Schnez wanted to found an organization of units composed of former officers, ideally entire staffs of elite divisions of the Wehrmacht, which could be rapidly deployed in case of an attack.
According to the lists contained in the documents, the men were all employed: They included businesspeople, sales representatives, a coal merchant, a criminal lawyer, an attorney, a technical instructor and even a mayor.
Presumably they were all anti-Communists and, in some cases, motivated by a desire for adventure. For example, the documents state that retired Lieutenant General Hermann Hölter “didn’t feel happy just working in an office.”

Most of the members of the secret reserve lived in southern Germany. An overview in the documents shows that Rudolf von Bünau, a retired infantry general, led a “group staff” out of Stuttgart.
There were further sub-units in Ulm (led by retired Lieutenant General Hans Wagner), Heilbronn (retired Lieutenant General Alfred Reinhardt), Karlsruhe (retired Major General Werner Kampfhenkel), Freiburg (retired Major General Wilhelm Nagel) and many other cities as well.
Schnez’s list wasn’t passed on, but the documents state he claimed it included 10,000 names, enough to constitute the core staff of three divisions. For reasons of secrecy, he inducted only 2,000 officers.
Still, Schnez had no doubts that the rest would join them. There didn’t seem to be any dearth of candidates for the units: After all, there was no lack of German men with war experience.
It remained to be determined where they could relocate to in case of emergency. Schnez negotiated with Swiss locations, but their reactions were “very restrained,” the documents state he later planned a possible move to Spain to use as a base from which to fight on the side of the Americans.

 Contemporaries described Schnez as an energetic organizer, but also self-confident and aloof. He maintained contacts with the League of German Youth and its specialized organization, the Technischer Dienst (Technical Service), which were preparing themselves for a partisan war against the Soviets.
The two groups, secretly funded by the United States, included former Nazi officers as members, and were both banned by the West German federal government in 1953 as extreme-right organizations. Schnez, it seems, had no qualms whatsoever associating himself with former Nazis.
Schnez also maintained a self-described intelligence apparatus that evaluated candidates for the “Insurance Company,” as he referred to the project, and determined if they had suspicious qualities.
A criminal named K. was described as “intelligent, young and half-Jewish.”US documents viewed by SPIEGEL indicate that Schnez negotiated with former SS Obersturmbannführer Otto Skorzeny.
The SS officer became a Nazi hero during World War II after he carried out a successful mission to free deposed Italian dictator Benito Mussolini, who had been arrested by the Italian king.
The former SS man had pursued plans similar to those of Schnez. In February 1951, the two agreed to “cooperate immediately in the Swabia region.” It is still unknown today what precisely became of that deal.

In his search for financing for a full-time operation, Schnez requested help from the West German secret service during the summer of 1951.
During a July 24, 1951 meeting, Schnez offered the services of his shadow army to Gehlen, the head of the intelligence service, for “military use” or “simply as a potential force,” be it for a German exile government or the Western allies.
A notation in papers from the Gehlen Organization states that there had “long been relations of a friendly nature” between Schnez and Reinhard Gehlen.
The documents also indicate that the secret service first became aware of the clandestine force during the spring of 1951. The Gehlen Organization classified Schnez as a “special connection” with the unattractive code name “Schnepfe,” German for “snipe”.

Did Adenauer Shy Away?
It’s likely that Gehlens’ enthusiasm for Schnez’s offer would have been greater if had it come one year earlier, when the Korean War was breaking out. At the time, the West German capital city of Bonn and Washington had considered the idea of “gathering members of former German elite divisions in the event of a catastrophe, arming and then assigning them to Allied defense troops.”

Within a year, the situation had defused somewhat, and Adenauer had retreated from this idea. Instead, he pushed for West Germany to integrate more deeply with the West and for the establishment of the Bundeswehr. Schnez’s illegal group had the potential to threaten that policy — if its existence had become public knowledge, it could have spiraled into an international scandal.
Still, Adenauer decided not to take action against Schnez’s organization — which raises several questions: Was he shying away from a conflict with veterans of the Wehrmacht and the Waffen-SS?
There were misgivings within the Gehlen Organization, particularly surrounding Skorzeny. According to another BND document seen by SPIEGEL, a division head raised the question of whether it was possible for the organization to take an aggressive stance against Skorzeny. The Gehlen Organization man suggested consulting “the SS”, adding, the SS “is a factor and we should sound out opinions in detail there before making a decision.”
Apparently networks of old and former Nazis still exercised considerable influence during the 1950s.
It also became clear in 1951 that years would pass before the Bundeswehr could be established. From Adenauer’s perspective, this meant that, for the time being, the loyalty of Schnez and his comrades should be secured for the event of a worst-case scenario.
That’s probably why Gehlen was assigned by the Chancellery “to look after and to monitor the group.”
It appears Konrad Adenauer informed both his American allies as well as the political opposition of the plan at the time. The papers seem to indicate that Carlo Schmid, at the time a member of the SPD’s national executive committee, was “in the loop.”

Little Known about Disbanding of Army
From that point on, Gehlen’s staff had frequent contact with Shnez. Gehlen and Schnez also reached an agreement to share intelligence derived from spying efforts. Schnez boasted of having a “particularly well-organized” intelligence apparatus.
From that point on, the Gehlen Organization became the recipient of alert lists including the names of former German soldiers who had allegedly behaved in an “undignified” manner as Soviet prisoners of war, the insinuation being that the men had defected to support the Soviet Union. In other instances, they reported “people suspected of being communists in the Stuttgart area.”
But Schnez never got showered with the money he had hoped for. Gehlen only allowed him to receive small sums, which dried up during the autumn of 1953. Two years later, the Bundeswehr swore in its first 101 volunteers. With the rearmament of West Germany, Schnez’s force became redundant.

It is currently unknown exactly when the secret army disbanded, as no fuss was made at the time. Schnez died in 2007 without ever stating anything publicly about these events. His records on the “Insurance Company” have disappeared.
What is known stems largely from documents relating to the Gehlen Organization that made their way into the classified archive of its successor, the BND.
It appears they were deliberately filed there under the misleading title “insurances” in the hope that no one would ever find any reason to take interest in them.

Categories
Allies This great Nation & Its People

We need more MEN like this Good Pastor!

R-E-S-P-E-C-T: Black Reverend Hilariously Calls Out Black Criminality at Aretha Franklin’s Funeral

Respect.
“Respect” is a black preacher going to a funeral for a purported black legend and calling out the black community in America for creating all the problems for blacks commonly and habitually blamed on structural inequality, implicit bias, white supremacy and the debilitating impacting of white privilege.
[Aretha Franklin’s family blasts ‘black-on-black crime’ eulogy, SFGate.com, 9-4-18]:

As Aretha Franklin’s eight-hour funeral drew to a close last week, the Rev. Jasper Williams Jr. rose from his seat and picked up the microphone.

 

Reverend Williams embarrassed blacks with a truthful eulogy for Aretha Franklin

Clad in a black suit, accented by a bright red tie and pocket square, the Atlanta-based pastor began eulogizing the Queen of Soul with an impassioned rendition of the popular hymn, “Father, I Stretch My Hands to thee.” A large silver cross swung from his neck.

“This is my subject as I attempt to eulogize Aretha Franklin; my subject is Aretha, the Queen of Soul,” Williams said as the song’s final notes faded on Friday.

But in the roughly 40 minutes that followed inside Greater Grace Temple in Detroit, Williams would devote more time to voicing criticisms about black parenting and “black-on-black crime” than Franklin’s life and legacy. His words prompted swift backlash on social media, many slamming him for being “homophobic,” “misogynistic” and disrespecting other black people.

Among those who didn’t appreciate Williams’s eulogy were Franklin’s family members, who called his comments “offensive and distasteful,” the Detroit Free Press reported.

“Rev. Jasper Williams spent more than 50 minutes speaking and at no time did he properly eulogize her,” Vaughn Franklin, the late singer’s nephew, said in a statement on behalf of his family. He told the Associated Press that the eulogy “caught the entire family off guard.”

In the statement to the Detroit Free Press, Vaughn Franklin said Williams was asked to perform the eulogy because he had eulogized other family members, including the singer’s father, the Rev. C.L. Franklin. But, he added that, “there were several other people that my aunt admired that would have been outstanding individuals to deliver her eulogy.”

“We feel that Rev. Jasper Williams Jr. used this platform to push his negative agenda, which as a family, we do not agree with,” the statement said.

During his eulogy, Williams drew outcry for his views on single-parent households run by black mothers and the Black Lives Matter movement.

He described raising children in a fatherless home as “abortion after birth.”

“Seventy percent of our households are led by our precious, proud, fine black women,” he said. “But as proud, beautiful and fine as our black women are, one thing a black woman cannot do. A black woman cannot raise a black boy to be a man. She can’t do that.”

Franklin was a single mother of four boys.

Kei Williams Not Related to Rev. Jasper tweeted “How do you turn Aretha Franklin’s funeral into a dragging of Black women? HOW DARE YOU….”

Rep. Chaz Beasley tweeted “No disrespect to Jasper Williams, but my single mother raised me to be a man pretty well. . . #ArethaFranklinFuneral”

When Williams spoke about the Black Lives Matter movement, he used it to critique black-on-black violence.

“When we kill one hundred of us, nobody says anything,” he said. “Nobody does anything.”

He added: “Black-on-black crime. We’re all doing time. We’re locked up in our mind. There’s got to be a better way. We must stop this today.”

Then, he said if he were asked today ‘Do black lives matter,’ he would answer, ‘No, black lives do not matter.”

“Black lives will not matter. Black lives ought not matter,” he said as the crowd applauded. “Black lives should not matter. Black lives must not matter. Until black people start respecting black lives and stop killing ourselves, black lives can never matter.”

Though some supported Williams’s stance, his comments were met with immediate reaction at the funeral when singer Stevie Wonder reportedly shouted, “Black lives matter.”

On Twitter, some described the eulogy as a “disaster” and a “disgrace.”

 

A ‘disgrace’?
No, it’s called the truth.
White people are absolved from the problems black people create for themselves. We owe blacks nothing.
Absolutely nothing.
Reverend Williams spoke the truth and it doesn’t matter what blacks think about it, because blacks should have absolutely no impact on any policy governing white lives.
They can’t even govern their own community without blaming imaginary white ghosts for haunting every aspect of their lives.
Categories
Allies

I would to see her & my lovely wife share a cup of coffee! It would be an interesting conversation to say the least!

Grunts & Squeals in the Dark Not as Scary as Imagined, My Texas Wild Hog Hunt

by Laura Mooney
This was my very first try at Texas wild hog hunting at night, and now I can not wait to go back.

Thermal Hog Hunting
Thermal Hog Hunting

Texas – -(AmmoLand.com)- If you met me at the grocery store on my way home from work, you probably wouldn’t guess that I am an outdoorsy type of woman – let alone a woman who enjoys shooting guns.

I’m very comfortable dressed up in my high heels and tight jeans, but I also enjoy getting outdoors for fresh air and adventure in my hunting boots and camo. So when my husband asked if I’d be interested in joining him on a hog hunt in Texas, I was excited to go.

I’ve gone hunting with him a few times since I learned to shoot several years ago, and it’s been a fun activity to share. But I’d never been on a hog hunt before, and I have to admit that the thought of hunting wild hogs in the dark late at night made me a little uneasy.
I was glad to know that we were scheduled to hunt with Texas’ own Three Curl Outfitters, a guide service that is located within an hour’s drive from Dallas. Going out with an experienced guide would make a big difference in helping me feel safe and give us a better chance for success.

As I packed for my flight, I could feel my comfort zone tugging at me. Why would I want to leave my home to trudge around a Texas field at night? Before getting married and having children, I had been pretty fearless. Then, after years of being responsible for a family, creating a safe and comfortable home filled with daily routines and making sure everyone was fed and got to their activities on time, I could feel my comfort zone starting to shrink.

Then I remembered what someone had once taught me. Comfort zones are like rubber bands. If we don’t pull them, they don’t expand. I thought of old rubber bands I’d found over the years, usually wrapped around decks of cards that had been tucked away in a drawer for a very long time and often so dried up that they just crumbled. That’s not how I want my life to be!

Why hog hunting?

As much as I was looking forward to the adventure, I wondered how I would feel shooting a wild hog. Would it be easy to pull the trigger, or would I hesitate? Shooting animals is quite different from shooting targets. If I’m going to hunt an animal, I want to understand the reasons for taking its life.
So I did some research and I learned that wild hogs cause a lot of damage and destruction, especially in rural areas where they destroy crops and push out other animals. They have no natural predators, and their population in Texas is out of control, with some estimates ranging up to almost three million hogs. And it is increasing at a tremendous rate. Sows can breed when they are as young as six months, and they can give birth to two litters of four to eight piglets (even up to 12) every 12 to 15 months.

Hunting is a widely supported means for controlling their population. In fact, feral hogs are considered an invasive species in Texas and can be hunted all year round.

Knowing that hunting wild hogs provides food is important to me as well. Their meat is leaner and richer in flavor than commercially raised pork, and you don’t have to worry about antibiotics that might be used in farm-raised hogs.

Three Curl Outfitters Outfitters’ Lodge

As we drove from Dallas to the lodge, I was asked over and over again, “So do you think you’re ready for this?” I started to wonder if I should be afraid of what I was getting myself into.

Charles Spiegel and Stephen Miley of Three Curl Outfitters
Charles Spiegel and Stephen Miley of Three Curl Outfitters

We pulled up to Three Curl Outfitters at about 5:30 PM, just before sunset. Charles, one of the owners, and Steven, a guide who has been a friend of Charles’ family for years, greeted us at the door. The lodge wasn’t the Ritz Carlton, but it was very welcoming and clean. The main room was a comfortable place to relax after our day of travel, and the hog’s head and duck mounted on the wall added nice decorative touches.
With my husband working in the firearms business, most of the conversations were about AR-15 and AR-10 platforms and appropriate hog hunting ammunition. Three Curl Outfitters uses a variety of AR platform rifles, most of them AR-10’s chambered in 308.
This larger AR platform is a little heavier to carry compared to its AR-15 cousin, but the 308 round offers tremendous knockdown power on a feral hog. I was fortunate to carry a smaller AR-15 chambered in 6.5 Grendel. The Grendel round is also very effective on hogs, and the lighter platform is much more user-friendly to carry.

Laura Mooney with an AR-15 chambered in 6.5 Grendel
Laura Mooney with an AR-15 chambered in 6.5 Grendel

After a while, our conversation turned to the weather forecast and the threat of wind and rain, which was not very promising for hunting. But we had only one night to stay and no control over the weather, so we gathered our gear and hoped for the best.
When the sun went down, we headed outside for some pre-hunt safety training. Steven led us through important rifle-handling instructions for night hunting and worked with each of us individually as we practiced lifting our rifle, setting it on a tripod, and finding a target through the scope. He also explained how he would communicate silently with us during the hunt. His emphasis on the importance of safety and clear communication put me at ease.

On the Hunt

It was about 7:30 PM when we took off for our hunting adventure, a little earlier than normal since we were trying to get out ahead of the bad weather.
From time to time, we pulled over to the side of the road, and Steven used his Pulsar Thermal Imaging Monocular to scan the fields. All of the rifles were outfitted with the Pulsar Trail XP50 Thermal Riflescope. This is an impressive optic packed with amazing features like 13 digital reticles, the ability to detect human-sized heat at 2,000 yards, built-in video recording with recoil activation, water-proofing, and white-hot and black-hot modes. The thermal unit’s performance was outstanding in terms of picking up the target even during our wet weather. Thermal units notoriously struggle in humid conditions, but not this Pulsar.

As our guides had feared, there was not much animal activity. Steven had explained to us earlier that we were more likely to find a large hog standing alone in a field during bad weather than a sounder of hogs gathered together.

When he finally spotted a hog, we got out of the truck, shutting our doors as quietly as possible, and walked in a single file following Steven’s lead. It was dark, but there was enough light to make silhouettes visible. Our goal was to create the smallest image possible in case a hog spotted our movement.
I was surprised that I wasn’t afraid of being out in the dark. There were so many things to pay attention to that I wasn’t worried about what I couldn’t see. At one point I realized the zipper on my jacket was clanking against my rifle as I walked, so I concentrated on taking each step quietly.
We continued walking directly behind Steven across the muddy farmland, occasionally stopping and holding very still. We were all following closely together, so I didn’t feel alone or scared. I was just super focused on following directions and being prepared to set up my rifle whenever I was told we were close enough to our target.
Unfortunately, before we could take aim, the hog decided to move on. We relaxed and whispered a little to each other as we headed back to the truck. That’s when I realized how far we had walked out into the field. And how much mud was caked onto the bottom of my hiking boots! Fortunately, the rain had been light and the ground wasn’t too wet, but the mud that stuck to my boots made me feel like I was walking in very heavy platform shoes.
When we arrived back at the truck, Steven took our rifles and put them safely inside. After driving past a few more fields we found a sounder of hogs at a feeder. Again, we did our best to sneak up on them, but they left before we could get close enough for a shot.

Three Curl Outfitters Lodge
Three Curl Outfitters Lodge

 
It was getting late and we were all feeling tired, so we agreed to call it a night. Somehow, those Texas fields had found a way to hide three million wild hogs from us. There was no need for Steven to apologize for not getting any hogs, but he did. The wind, rain, lightning, and thunder made it a tall challenge to stalk and shoot a lot of hogs. That’s why they call it hunting, and not shooting.
After a good night’s sleep and a cup of coffee in the morning, we packed up and headed home. In the end, I didn’t get to find out if I was ready to pull the trigger on a wild hog, but I do know that it was a fun adventure and it felt good to push myself outside my comfort zone. Everyone in our group had a great time.
If you are interested in exploring hunting opportunities, I highly recommend using an outfitter.
Whether you are looking to hunt duck, dove, deer, or wild hogs in the Dallas area, I trust that Three Curl Outfitters will make sure you are comfortable and will take care of everything from beginning to end.

I would agree with the message on their website: “You won’t find a better bunch of guys or guides.”

 


Laura Mooney
Laura Mooney
Categories
All About Guns Allies Hard Nosed Folks Both Good & Bad Well I thought it was funny!

Gunny & Glock – Wrong Taxi – Extended Version


Well I liked it! Grumpy

Categories
Allies

Some thoughts on Heller

Each Generation, Interpreting the Text of the Constitution

Oliver Wendell Holmes
Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was an American jurist who served as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1902 to 1932, and as Acting Chief Justice of the United States from January–February 1930

Fayetteville, AR –-(Ammoland.com)- I am told by gun control advocates that the Heller decision was a radical reinterpretation of the Second Amendment, a reading that is not to be found anywhere in legal thinking or rulings before 2008.
While the case law is thin, in fact, there always have been two understandings of the text: protection of individual rights or collective powers of the state.

It is true to say that the 2008 ruling shifted the presumption away from the claim that ordinary Americans had to prove their need toward one that accepts ownership and carry of firearms as something that belongs to each of us.

Does that negate the force of the ruling?

To people who favor control, it does, though they should ask themselves how far they are willing to go with this line of thinking. The modern reading of several amendments seem apparent to many today, but this is not, in fact, the reality.
Take as an illustration of this the First Amendment. It’s protections of free speech, and a free press is foundational to a democratic society, but that is a measure of enlightenment that has taken us centuries to work out.
In the view of the English jurist, William Blackstone, free speech simply meant that no prior restraint could be imposed.
You couldn’t be stopped from speaking your mind, but if what you said displeased those in power, you could be punished afterward. Think of Mel Gibson’s William Wallace shouting, “freedom!” before being relieved of his head.
Initially, the Bill of Rights did not apply to the states. The framers were under the impression, erroneous as it has proved to be, that the states were the more reliable guarantor of fundamental rights.
The ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment was in part a response to the gap in the protection of rights, and over time, more and more of the first ten amendments have been incorporated under the due process clause of the Fourteenth against the states.
But even then, the old thinking about what free speech means remained until Oliver Wendell Holmes, the turn of the twentieth century’s Anthony Kennedy, went through an evolution of his understanding.
As Thomas Healy discusses in his book, The Great Dissent, Holmes initially had no love for the idea of individual rights.
It was his association with Harold Laski, at the time a democratic socialist, and others who convinced him that the promise of the progressive movement could only be fulfilled if each member of a society can offer points of view that are contrary to the settled beliefs of the majority.

All of this is to say that we have gone in a promising direction in our thinking about more than one right. And since each generation must come to terms with what the Constitution means, it’s good to see that we’re headed in the right direction.

The claim is often made that we have a living document as if that excuses any re-imagining that anyone desires, but the life of a free society will last only if the growth we go through preserves and expands the value of individual rights.
That growth is to be celebrated, not opposed, and as with the First Amendment, so with the Second, we are going where we should.


Greg Camp
Greg Camp

About Greg Camp
Greg Camp has taught English composition and literature since 1998 and is the author of six books, including a western, The Willing Spirit, and Each One, Teach One, with Ranjit Singh on gun politics in America. His books can be found on Amazon. He tweets @gregcampnc.

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Care to guess on who got a new toy yesterday ?

Image result for ruger 10/22

That’s right Dear Friends & Readers! Seems that I was finally able to find me a really nice Ruger 10/22 at one of my favorite gun shops – American Gun Works in Glendale*.Image result for ruger 10/22

In that I have always wanted one for the past 40 odd years. But I never had the cash or the opportunity to get one. So I guess that God has finally taken pity on this old Sinner.
Hopefully I am planning to take it to the range and get it zeroed in. Hopefully I we see some of you guys at the Angeles Range soon!
As to the shop American Gun Works, that I bought it from.

They are one of the few Gun Shops out here that have both an excellent selection of firearms. That and they have a great Gunsmith, who really has his shit together!  Plus & most Importantly a great attitude toward their Customers!

* Here is their website. If you are in the Area. It would behoove you to check them out, as it would worthy of your time.
Related image

American Gun Works – Glendale, California USA

americangunworks.net/

Variety of firearms Lots of ammunition Accessories by the handful All American, All The Time. Welcome to our new website! We are under new ownership, with a …

Contact

Contact Us. phone: 818.956.6010 fax: 818.548.8606. 1837 W …

Links

Accu-Tek: Accu-Tek pistols are manufactured by Excel …

Image result for American Gun Works in Glendale
 

Categories
Allies

Burt Reynolds, Movie Star Who Played It for Grins, Dies at 82

The World is a little Less Funny now! – Grumpy

Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

From the NRA – In Wake of Jacksonville Shooting, “News” Outlet Recycles Article Calling for Firearm Confiscation

In Wake of Jacksonville Shooting, “News” Outlet Recycles Article Calling for Firearm Confiscation
It’s sometimes said that insanity can be defined as doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
If that’s true, it doesn’t speak well of gun control advocates’ mental health, insofar as they repeat the same ritual after every high-profile firearm-related crime, with little or no lasting impact on public opinion or national policy.
Their standard procedure is: immediately misreport basic facts of the incident; unleash the indignation of anti gun politicians and celebrities on social media;
condemn the NRA and anyone else who offers thoughts and prayers while awaiting reliable information;
demand the same types of gun controls that failed to prevent the incident; insist that the gun debate has reached a turning point;
and abruptly stop talking about the incident when emotions cool and facts emerge that show how existing gun controls failed.
The defining tactic in this whole chain of events is to seize and define the narrative in the immediate aftermath of the event before anybody actually knows what happened.
The website Vox.com, however, took this tendency to new depths by using a double-murder/suicide that took place at a video game competition in Jacksonville, Florida, to re-run nearly word-for-word an article the outlet had published in May after a firearm-related crime in Sante Fe, Texas.
In both cases, the author used his limited propaganda window to express opinions that gun control advocates usually shun in the calm, cold light of reasoned debate.
“What America likely needs,” he wrote, “is something … like Australia’s mandatory buyback program — essentially, a gun confiscation scheme — paired with a serious ban on specific firearms (including, potentially, all semiautomatic weapons).”
Yet if it’s crazy for gun control advocates to expect different results from doing the same thing, it’s equally crazy for Second Amendment supporters to ignore what the opposition says when they believe they have the leeway to really speak their mind.
Simply put, when someone tells you he wants to take your guns, the only safe bet is to take him at his word.
This is the reality of the gun control agenda: its adherents see guns as the problem and the absence of guns as the solution. Everything they do is geared toward the goal of reducing and eventually eliminating civilian firearm ownership.
The only variable is the speed at which they’re willing to accomplish this objective. Sometimes they’re willing to do it by attrition, with an eye toward the gradual tapering off of new gun owners.
But the temptation to extol mass firearm confiscation is one many simply cannot resist when their outrage is in full bloom.
To be fair, the Vox author admitted that his plan is not viable in the short term and that “[p]art of the holdup is the Second Amendment.” He was quick to endorse whatever “milder” gun control the U.S. will tolerate in the meantime, while it works up the will “to take the action it really needs.”
But again, let’s not kid ourselves about what this “milder” gun control really accomplishes.
It’s certainly not public safety, a fact illustrated by the Jacksonville incident itself. According to media accounts, the alleged perpetrator bought the pistol he used in his crime in Maryland, which has one of the nation’s strictest gun control regimes.
He then reportedly used that pistol to commit a multiple-murder/suicide in a state known for a more lenient approach to gun control. The scene of the crime was also a gun-free zone.
And while the media is indulging in its usual obsession about what “should have” stopped him from buying gun, the alleged perpetrator cleared every “evidence-based polic[y]” the Vox author suggested might at least lead to “reduced injuries and deaths.”
This includes Maryland’s licensing and background check requirements, its expansive mental health disqualifiers for firearm ownership, and even its “assault weapons” and “large capacity” magazine bans.
This was “state of the art” gun control in 2013. It was Maryland’s “solution” to “preventing” something like what happened the year before in Newtown, Connecticut.
And now that it has failed so publicly, the Maryland legislature is said to be considering – you guessed it – even more restrictive gun control.
Because, ultimately, the only thing that gun control accomplishes is conditioning the public to accept ever more gun control under the false premise that we’re somehow just a few laws short of overcoming the problem of human evil.
Come to think of it, that’s a pretty good definition of insanity, as well.

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Your basic Stuff that an Old School Gunfighter would carry!


Colt Cobra in Galco leather & a  Bianchi speed strip loaded with Hornady Critical Duty ammo.
Stolen from OldNFO

Categories
All About Guns Allies Ammo

Some useful Information from the NRA to California Deer Hunters / Bambi Busters

Reminder for California Hunters: Phase 2 of Non-Lead Ammunition Requirements Currently in Effect

With deer season underway in some parts of the state and fast-approaching in others, and upland game bird season just around the corner, including dove-opener this weekend, it is important for hunters to be mindful of California’s non-lead ammunition hunting requirements imposed by AB 711 (2013) which NRA opposed. NRA has previously alertedhunters about the first and second phase of AB 711, which drastically expanded California’s restrictions on hunters using lead ammunition from previous years. These restrictions remain in effect this season.
Given the drastic changes caused by AB 711, its provisions were decided to be phased in over time, up until July 1, 2019, when they will be expanded to apply to the taking of any wildlife with a firearm in California. The first phase, which has been in effect since July 1, 2015, requires all California hunters to use certified “non-lead ammunition” when taking: (1) Nelson bighorn sheep anywhere within the state; and (2) any wildlife within a state Wildlife Area or an Ecological Reserve.
Additionally, as of July 1, 2016, AB 711’s second phase has taken effect. It requires hunters to use certified non-lead shot when taking any upland game birds anywhere in the state, except for dove, quail, snipe, or any game birds taken under the authority of a licensed game bird club. In other words, it requires use of non-lead shot statewide for taking turkey, chukar, and pheasant that are not hunted on the grounds of a properly licensed club. This second phase restriction also applies to game birds taken with a shotgun under a depredation permit.
Dove hunters should be aware that various prominent locations for dove hunting are inside Wildlife Areas and Ecological Reserves where non-lead shot will be required. For example, the Imperial Wildlife area includes the Wister Unit, Hazzard Unit, and the Finney-Ramer Unit—some of California’s most popular dove hunting locations. The Camp Cady Wildlife Area near Barstow and the Ash Creek Wildlife Area in Lassen County are also very popular. For a map of California’s existing Ecological Reserves and Wildlife Areas, visit https://map.dfg.ca.gov/lands/. And for more detailed information about specific Ecological Reserves and Wildlife Areas, visit: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Lands/Places-to-Visit.
While those hunting dove, quail, snipe, or any game birds taken under the authority of a licensed game bird club need not worry about the “Condor Zone” and instead only Wildlife Areas and Ecological Reserves, deer hunters must worry about both. Deer hunters should be aware that the California Condor Range includes portions of zone A, as well as all of zones D7, D8, D9, D10, D11, and D13. Hunting deer in any of these areas will require the use of non-lead ammunition.
For your convenience, NRA and CRPA have put together a quick reference guide to determine whether a particular hunt will require using non-lead ammunition.

 
For a full-size downloadable version of this map, visit https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=122314&inline
 
We strongly encourage all hunters to contact the California Department of Fish and Wildlife before going out to the field to determine whether the area you plan on hunting requires use of non-lead projectiles. For more information, contact the Department’s Wildlife Branch – Game Management at:
1812 9th Street, Sacramento, CA 95811
Phone: (916) 445-0411
Additionally, you can also call or visit any one of the Department’s Field and Regional Offices, a list of which is available online at https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Explore/Organization/LRB.
 
 
Hunter’s Guide to Understanding and Complying with
California’s Lead Ammunition Ban Now Available on NRA’s Website
 
NRA and CRPA have been at the forefront of the fight to protect traditional ammunition in California for years and achieved important successes prior to the passes of AB 711. Despite this setback, NRA and CRPA are not giving up on protecting their members who hunt in California from the lead ammunition ban. They will continue to monitor its implementation and enforcement to make sure hunters are treated fairly and according to the law.
To that end, NRA and CRPA have now published the Guide to Understanding and Complying with California’s Lead Ammunition Restrictions, which can also be found on the California Stand and Fight web page.  This helpful and important guide serves as a comprehensive resource for hunters who need to know about California’s lead ammunition restrictions. The guide will aid hunters in navigating California’s complex lead ammunition regulations, especially when using traditional lead ammunition for hunting while doing so remains legal in certain areas for a limited time.
As explained above, the new law will require the use of non-lead ammunition for all hunting statewide beginning July 1, 2019. In the years leading up to the total statewide ban, lead ammunition used for hunting will be incrementally restricted in phases. The guide explains each of the three phases in detail and will help hunters comply with these patchwork restrictions as they take effect.