Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Military Generals Who Awarded Themselves LOTS Of Medals

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Gun Fearing Wussies You have to be kidding, right!?!

Minnesota ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Includes ‘Fixed Magazine’ .22s Holding More Than 10 Rounds by David Codrea

s shown below, I’d change this graphic to show the silhouette of a Marlin. (MN Gun Owners Caucus/X)

“[Minnesota’s] House File 3570 was referred to the House Committee on Public Safety Finance and Policy and would ban so called ‘assault weapons by expanding upon an existing statute used to define these firearms,” NRA-ILA reported Wednesday. “The bill would also prohibit the sale or transfer of ‘assault weapons’, establish a buyback program, and call for an appropriation from the general fund.”

“HF 3570 uses a broad list of different firearms to define ‘semiautomatic military-style assault weapon’,” NRA continued. “Additionally, varying models of a specific gun or models similar to those listed in the bill are prohibited. Modifications and accessories like protruding grips and barrel shrouds, are features that would also cause a gun to be banned. The transfer of semiautomatic military-style assault weapons is prohibited, with very limited exceptions for law enforcement and the military.”

It’s like Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party Second Amendment haters have taken all the various iterations of semi auto bans from “by name” to “by characteristics” and added steroids to the mix.  Whereas 1994’s federal ban included semi-automatic rifles able to accept detachable magazines with two or more of the “evil” mods like folding stocks, pistol grips, flash hiders and the like, taking a page from California, HF 3570 reduces rejection criteria to “one or more.”

It also lines out a section ceding that “a firearm is not a ‘semiautomatic military-style assault weapon’ if it is generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes under United States Code.” While Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership was the first to warn about the Nazi origins of the “sporting purposes” term, the elimination of even that tells us much about the authoritarian mindset of Minnesota’s violence monopolists.

HF 3570 adds another curious disqualifier, “thumbhole stocks.” That’s because initially, thumbhole stocks were offered as stability and comfort workarounds to the federal pistol grip ban. So, California and other Democrat states decided their priority was for firearms to be less steady and therefore less accurate, ludicrously in the name of “commonsense gun safety.”

And naturally, no attack on armed citizens would be complete without special carveouts for the “Only Ones” expected to enforce the infringements.

There’s one other disqualifier though that should clear up ATF Director Steve Dettelbach’s inability to define what an “assault weapon” is, itself reminiscent of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson taking a pass on defining “woman.” He should have just said “A Marlin 70620 Model 60 .22 Long Rifle.”Read

After all, the bill text says on line 2.26:

(b) Semiautomatic military-style assault weapon also includes any…

Then go down to line 3.5 and it includes:

…rimfire rifle with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition;

And the Marlin advertises a 14 + 1 capacity.

This is what these maniacs are demonizing as a “weapon of war” that “has no business on our streets” and no other purpose but the mass slaughter of innocents. After all, you can’t hunt deer with it!  All that’s missing is some lefty vet saying it’s the same gun he carried in Iraq and Afghanistan.

No matter how much they scoff, deny, and lie, of course they’re talking about taking your guns.

And Minnesota’s not alone—California’s right with them on “large capacity magazines,” albeit they exempt “.22 caliber tube ammunition feeding devices or tubular magazines contained in a lever-action firearm” (emphasis added)—at least until the grabbers decide otherwise. And it would appear to be the same in New York, while Illinois, surprisingly, hasn’t “caught up” yet.

It’s interesting to note the backgrounds of the bill’s authors, Leigh Finke, Esther Agbaje, Alicia ‘Liish’ Kozlowski, Larry Kraft, and Samantha Sencer-Mura, DFL stalwarts and darlings of the prohibitionists all, and not a farmer or a laborer in the bunch. (That’s OK—it’s not like Antifa is comprised of those workers” they say they champion.) Ask them about the specifics of what they’re banning, aside from “everything,” and it’s highly likely that an on-the-spot challenge would result in a “shoulder thing that goes up” answer.

While HF 3570 is in its initial stages and has a long way to go, the dominant DFL is using momentum it gained getting due process-denying “red flag” gun confiscations mandated beginning this year. Meanwhile, Minnesota’s denying 18 to 20-year-old adults their right to carry firearms is being challenged.

Don’t look to formerly NRA-endorsed Gov. Tim Walz to honor any of the promises he made before he decided he didn’t need them anymore. That’s what happens when gun owners are led to believe a Democrat Fudd believes in their rights or has anyone’s interests at heart but his own.

The question now is, when is the Supreme Court going to use Bruen to put a stop to this nonsense? They will, won’t they?


About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

For when the entire Red Chinese Army shows up at your house.

Or when you live in the wrong side of the tracks neighborhood! Anyways if you can afford this. Then you can afford to move! Grumpy

Categories
Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom Well I thought it was funny! You have to be kidding, right!?!

After a really bad day in my classroom, I would think “Hey I should of stayed in the Army… Nah!”

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California You have to be kidding, right!?!

1 million rounds of ammo, hundreds of illegal firearms seized in Bay Area home, AG Bonta says

RICHMOND, Calif. (KGO) — California Attorney General Rob Bonta Thursday announced the arrest of a suspect in the city of Richmond with a large cache of illegal firearms.

This includes assault weapons, high-capacity magazines, and approximately one million rounds of ammunition. Officials say the suspect is allegedly not legally allowed to own firearms.

“This arrest demonstrates exactly why the Armed and Prohibited Persons System is vital for the safety of our communities,” Bonta said in a press release. “In our efforts to retrieve guns from a prohibited individual, we found hundreds of allegedly illegal weapons and approximately one million rounds of ammunition.”

Bonta’s office said on Jan. 21, investigators from multiple agencies assisted in serving a search warrant at the suspect’s residence in Richmond. During the search, several suspected grenades were discovered and the Walnut Creek Police Department Bomb Squad and Travis Air

Force Base Bomb Squad were asked to respond. The grenades were found to be inert.

Officials say they seized approximately 11 military-style machine guns, 133 handguns, 37 rifles, 60 assault rifles, 7 shotguns, 20 silencers, 4 flare guns, 3,000 large capacity magazines, approximately one million rounds of miscellaneous caliber ammunition, and dozens of rifle receivers and pistol frames.

In 2006, California became first state to establish the Armed and Prohibited Persons System – which tracks firearm owners who are prohibited from owning weapons.

It is not clear why the suspect in this case is prohibited from owning weapons.


From link – “It is not clear why the suspect in this case is prohibited from owning weapons.”

It’s not clear because they’re blowing smoke up your ass. Here’s some back story from another web site I visit (frugalsquirrels.com) –

Bud was living the dream we all have..

But, there was nothing illegal about his collection. Here is the real story.

This is from a similar article and if true the state is lying to everyone.

My friend is a local FFL that does contract work for the Police Department and Sheriff’s Department where this happened and he gave me some background to this case a few days ago. The man who this stuff belonged to is in his 90s and a relative of his had to obtain legal guardianship over the man because he is suffering from advanced dementia which is why he is no longer legally allowed to possess firearms.

The man has not lived in the house where his collection was stored for the better part of 6 years because he’s living in a nursing home. The majority of the firearms have been owned for more than 40 years well before they were ever regulated in California and the man has possessed a special federal firearms license called a Curios and Relic license for the better part of 60 years that allowed him under California law to possess machine guns.

The actual machine guns that were in the man’s possession are ones that are legally owned and are registered with the NFA and the tax has been paid on them. The authorities have been well aware of what was in his possession because he registered them with the state when they required it. They’re simply pretending like this man is a criminal once they found out he was no longer mentally fit to possess the firearms and gleefully seized his collection.

Seems the state is lying about the circumstances of this case and tried to make it look like they made a huge bust.

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

The Maharaja of Cooch-Behar, or, Why is there no hunting in India?

For a Throwback Thursday, we’ll roll the time back 110 year ago, when India was a big-game hunter’s heaven on Earth. Deer and blackbuck antelope, ibex and ram, wild buffalo and gaur, leopard and tiger, the Indian Shikar was the principle jewel in every international hunter’s crown. сборы на охоту индия 2

Today there’s no hunting in India, as everyone knows. Well, not quite. “Hunting”, in the strict sense of the word, is forbidden by law. But farmers whose crops are damaged by wildlife, can get cull licenses and employ other people to combat the depredations. They say that quite a few fields are only planted to have legit reason to apply for a cull license. Even though gun permits are hard to obtain, there’s still a small but stubborn gunmaking industry, with small shops building double and single barreled shotguns the traditional way. And the game rangers have to track down man-eating tigers and leopards just as Jim Corbett did in the last century.

The hunting ban is there, according to the official version, because Indians used to live in harmony with the nature until the White Man arrived, and taught the Maharajas to hunt for sport. Then the colonizers together with local collaborators destroyed the tigers, leopards and rhinos.магараджа - вицекороль индии керзон с тигром

This idyllic vision does not quite explain why, after half a century of hunting ban, the tiger along with a large share of other Indian wildlife, is still endangered. Nor why, under the facade of vegetarian Hinduist paradise, people still have to kill animals – out of necessity and for sport, that’s not always easy to tell apart. And as for how much the official politically correct half-truth matches the historical fact, let’s turn to just one shikar book, Thirty Seven Years of Big-Game Shooting by Sri Nripendra Narayana, the Maharaja of Cooch-Behar (1862-1911).

In Cooch-Behar, Sri Nripendra is still honored as the best ruler of the state ever. His reign saw numerous advances in all areas of life from railroad construction to education and women’s liberation. The only thing that might mar the image of this multicultural and enlightened prince – not in our eyes, of course – was that he was an avid hunter. In the best traditions of the Raj his “shooting parties” featured dozens of elephants acting as drivers and guests included the Viceroys of India.

The elephants – “one always requires a line of at least 40 Elephants to do any good in the jungles I have shot over” , he wrote – were a necessity rather than a luxury, as the “jungle he has shot over” is not the rainforest you see in Disney’s Jungle Book cartoons, but a level plain, intersected by a network of rivers and marshes, and covered by grass and reeds tall enough to conceal an elephant!магараджа цепь загонщиков

On a tour to Britain Sri Nripendra became friends with the cream of the British shooting public, headed by the future King Edward VII, and so impressed them with his stories that they persuaded him to publish them as a book. It runs for nearly three hundred pages, covering methodically almost every beast ever bagged by the Maharaja’s shooting parties – a treasure trove for a researcher – but I fear you, dear reader, are getting bored, so before we turn to the big question, let’s recount a few cases of the Indian classic: a close call with a tiger.

We found a real good fighting Tigress close to camp on the 9th. The day before, we had seen a dead cow and we started operations by inspecting the place. I saw pug marks and fancied they belonged to a Tiger and not to a Leopard as some thought.

 

The first two beats were blank, and we then tried a small patch on the other side of the nullah, out of which a Tigress came out to Ezra. He fired, and on receiving the shot she charged at once, Ezra’s elephant swinging round and making off. The Tigress then swam the nullah and Burgess and Ashton got shots at her as she was crossing. Believing the ­beast was wounded and meant mischief, I only sent on four guns as stops, joining the line myself with Smyth, Perree and Ashton.

 

We hadn’t gone very far when I heard a roar, and the next moment ­Elephants were flying round in all directions. Unfortunately she had singled out a pad elephant on which to wreak her vengeance and she got well home on him, giving him a nasty bite over the eye. The Elephant carried her on his head for a few seconds and then chucked her off. She next began charging the Elephants indiscriminately and presently came in my direction.

 

­I had her carefully covered with my ‘450, and was just on the point of firing when my Elephant suddenly turned tail and went for dear life, I holding on all I knew. After a bit the mahout managed to get my beast back, and as I did not want any more Elephants mauled, I called in all the howdahs, and forming line moved towards the place she was last seen. I was beginning to wonder if she had managed to sneak off, when, with another roar, she went for Perree and actually scratched old “Sagaria” on the trunk before Perree dropped her; for her size, 8’-4 1/2″, she certainly took a lot of beating as a fighter.

магараджа перед охотойThe Mahajara was keen on every novel invention in hunting guns, although on a few occasions he found himself wishing he’d stuck to older technology.

Khubber of Tiger, which proved good, was brought in on the 12th, and just at the end of the beat she walked out to me and I bowled her over, first shot. She rolled about a good bit, and ­I kept pulling at the trigger to finish her, not ­realizing till too late that I was not using a ­single-trigger gun. Suddenly recovering herself, ­she dashed down the bank out of sight. I knew ­she was badly hit, and on the line coming up, told ­Jemadar Asgar to take it in and, if dead, to pick ­her up or let me know if she was inclined to be ­’ ugly. ”

 

I was standing on the top of the bank ­at this time, and “Tangru” called out that the ­Tiger was lying on its side. I shouted out to ­them to back out the Elephants and let me have ­a look at the beast. The words were hardly out ­of my mouth when the Tigress drove out the ­elephants and charged home on the Jemadar’s ­mount. Her teeth were fastened on the pad, and ­the Jemadar, by the greatest piece of luck, ­was just clear of her. I told the Jemadar and ­mahout to jump off, which they did, and I put two ­shots into the Tigress while still hanging on to ­the pad.

 

The second one finished her, and as she ­dropped off dead, the Elephant set to work pound­ing her. The men, especially the Jemadar, had a very narrow squeak, but, beyond a scratch in the ear, the Elephant was uninjured. I found my first bullet, a 12-bore Paradox firing 4 drams of powder, had hit her exactly on the right spot, and why it did not kill her dead I cannot understand.

Reading the book, it’s evident that Nripendra wasn’t just monkeying his British “superiors”. He was a true hunter at heart, and second to none in the game – one of the hardest, the Oriental splendor notwithstanding. Try hitting anything with a bullet from a rocking howdah as the elephant is making full steam to or from the quarry it justifiably fears! But the biggest question we have to ask here is, were his hunts responsible for the decline in Indian wildlife?магараджа с тигром

Thirty-Seven Years of Big-Game Shooting comes with a complete list of trophies by year, and sometimes by trip. If colonial hunts were so devastating, one would expect the number and size of trophies decrease over the years. In fact, the “game book” proves quite the opposite. The years with the record bags are those at the beginning of the new century, but they are intermixed with ‘bad’ seasons. In fact, there’s very little variation in bags over the time frame, and those that are there correlate with time spent hunting, and the usual factors such as weather and plain bad luck.

In short, the Maharaja’s hunts were totally sustainable. As Nripendra himself writes, concluding the record for the year 1902:

We had by this date completed exactly a fortnight’s shooting at Lahapara, and though from 19th to the 22nd little or nothing was bagged, taking the whole 14 days together, thirty-three head of big game were killed. With such a bag one would naturally expect the country to be depleted of beasts worth shooting, but this was not so. So far as one could judge, the district remained full of big game, including a fair number of Tiger.

Indian maharajas could have continued hunting the tall grass jungle for centuries, without any noticeable effect on rhino, tiger, and other wildlife. As is the case in much of the world where wildlife is depleted, it was destruction of the jungle to make room for tea plantations that did the animals in. Wish anti-hunters gave it a thought each time they pour themselves a cup!

Categories
The Green Machine You have to be kidding, right!?!

Army RANGER Officer Charged With CONDUCT UNBECOMING! ZERO Accountability…

I still cannot believe that a “man” like this guy got an officers commission in the Regular Army. That and make it up to Lt. Colonel. I mean did’nt anybody notice anything strange  about this “man”?

But I can easily believe that the Army covered for him and let him slide out of any real potential punishment. Like trading his posting at lovely San Luis Obispo to say a place in Kansas (Ft. Leavenworth United States Disciplinary Barracks) Where a sex offender like him would be most warmly greated by the Staff and “Guests” of Uncle Sam.

Grumpy the disgusted by this!

Categories
All About Guns Another potential ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE You have to be kidding, right!?!

Mexico tries to fine gun manufacturers by David

We wrote a while back that Mexico is suing US gun manufacturers because their products are heavily used by drug gangs and criminals in Mexico. Got shot down, right?

Now, we in the US have a law passed a couple of decades back called the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). At that time, one of the key tactics used by gun-ban groups was to sue gun manufactures at the drop of a hat . Kid uses a 40 year old Colt to shoot someone? Sue Colt.  Gun store gets robbed and a stolen Glock is used to rob someone three states away? Sue Glock. The idea was that if they continually forced gun makers to defend these bull$hit suits, pretty soon they would go bankrupt from legal fees even if they never lost. PLCAA says that if the guns are legally manufactured and sold, the gun companies’ responsibility for wrong-doing ends there.

If the gun is defective or deceptively marketed, they are still liable. (This is the “protection gun makers from lawsuits no other manufacturer has” that Biden and company whines about. Most companies are already protected by case law – you can sue a bar for serving a drunk driver because they are a proximate cause, but not Ford because they made the drunk’s Mustang, right?) The plethora of suits caused Congress to pass PLCAA.

But here is how the gun groups describe it:

PLCAA is a law that protects the gun industry from civil liability for harm caused by negligence, defective products, or irresponsible behavior. It denies justice to victims and survivors of gun violence and perpetuates the flow of crime guns into communities of color.  Brady.org

So many lies…

Anyhoo, Mexico is suing seven manufacturers and a distributor, alleging negligence, defective product, barratry, piracy, simony, and for all I know indecent exposure. (They also want to know how Mexican Army guns wind up in the hands of the narco-gangs… cough cough ARMY CORRUPTION cough cough. Different article.)

Now, any normal person would say they can’t do that, right? They’ve already been shot down once. Oh no… the 1st Circuit steps in.

U.S. appeals court on Monday revived a $10 billion lawsuit by Mexico seeking to hold American gun manufacturers responsible for facilitating the trafficking of weapons to drug cartels across the U.S.-Mexico border.
The Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturnedThe Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned a lower-court judge’s decision dismissing the case on the grounds that a U.S. law barred Mexico from suing Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI.O), Sturm, Ruger & Co and others.
Mexico’s lawyers argued the law only bars lawsuits over injuries that occur in the U.S. and does not shield the seven manufacturers and one distributor it sued from liability over the trafficking of guns to Mexican criminals.
U.S. Circuit Judge William Kayatta, writing for the three-judge panel, said that while the law can be applied to lawsuits by foreign governments, Mexico’s lawsuit “plausibly alleges a type of claim that is statutorily exempt from the PLCAA’s general prohibition.”
He said that was because the law was only designed to protect lawful firearms-related commerce, yet Mexico had accused the companies of aiding and abetting illegal gun sales by facilitating the trafficking of firearms into the country.  Reuters
Knowing that other than warranty work, once gun companies sell their guns to a distributor they are legally protected, should be sufficient. But these judges (whose decisions were reversed two out of three times last year ballotopedia) are saying “well,  since it is not a US suit it can proceed” (?!)
Welcome to Ford getting sued for making that Mustang.  Kinda makes you want to sue Mexico for all that fentanyl coming from them…

 

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

1967 High Standard Gun Catalog Brochure

Categories
All About Guns The Green Machine You have to be kidding, right!?!

Coastal Defenses and The Endicott Era