Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Being a Stranger in a very Strange Land California You have to be kidding, right!?!

Gun Control Fan Charged With Shooting at California ABC Affiliate By Cam Edwards

Image by Janmarcustrapp from Pixabay
The FBI re-arrested a California man accused of firing multiple shots at the ABC affiliate in Sacramento, California over the weekend, hours after the man was first arrested by Sacramento police but allowed to post bond.

64-year-old Anibal Hernandez Santana is facing state-level charges of assault with a deadly weapon, shooting into an occupied building and negligent discharge of a firearm, as well as the federal charges related to interfering with a federally licensed broadcast statios that led to him being taken into custody not long after he posted bond and left the Sacramento County jail on Saturday.

Though authorities have not officially said what Hernandez Santana’s alleged motive might have been, there are suspicions that the shooting was tied to ABC’s decision to yank Jimmy Kimmel off the air last week over his comments that portrayed the man accused of assassinating Charlie Kirk as a right-wing MAGA supporter of President Donald Trump.

Variety reports that Hernandez Santana’s social media contains a steady stream of anti-Trump postings, but Second Amendment Foundation Director of Legal Research and Education Kostas Moros says Hernandez-Santana is also a big fan of gun control.

On X, Hernandez Santana has, among other things, spoken out in favor of California’s ban on “large capacity” magazines, advocated for limiting gun sales to single-shot rifles for adults under the age of 25 , and an outright ban on so-called assault weapons.

More recently, Hernandez Santana posted “Where is a good heart attack when we need it the most?? Please Join in my thoughts and prayers for the physical demise of our fearful leader,” and “The authoritarian oligarchy is now complete. CBS+ caving, big law firms in DC, the subservients FBI and AG, university presidents stepping own, fan boys SCOTUS, public radio, ICE goons. We are going to have to ‘fight like hell’. Rules don’t apply if election was stolen. FIGHT!”

To the best of my knowledge, not a single media outlet has reported on Hernandez Santana’s support for gun control, though the Sacramento ABC affiliate shared a post where he claimed to have started carrying a gun after Donald Trump was elected in 2016.

“I haven’t seen [the posts]… It’s not completely uncommon. I mean, I’m on social media a lot and reading comments and from both sides really, there are some comments that I wouldn’t say are extreme, but that show a lot of passion,” said [Hernandez-Santana’s attorney Mark] Reichel. “I understand the concern that people would have, but they’re not uncommon.”

With the FBI now involved, Reichel believes politics are at play.

 

“If his social media points are considered radical by you, I guess it depends on your perspective. There’s a lot of this stuff that’s said by the President and you’d have to consider that radical also,” said Reichel. “I think the President and the Trump Justice Department and Pam Bondi aren’t going to let this one go by… Of course, they’re going to grab it and try to bring it into federal court as soon as they can because they’ve got somebody who is an educated liberal who they believe shot at the building.”

I know that Reichel has a duty to defend his client, but c’mon now. It’s not Hernandez Santana’s social media posts that landed him behind bars. It’s the suspicion that he fired multiple shots at a television station just a few days after Kimmel was yeeted from the airwaves.

There are plenty of people on the left and the right who’ve taken issue with the implied threats by FCC Chair Brendon Carr to go after ABC and its parent company Disney, but as far as I know none of them decided to take out their frustrations by firing multiple shots at their local ABC station.

Hernandez Santana’s posts on X might help explain his mindset and motive if he is, in fact, responsible for the shooting, but I don’t think anyone has said his “radical” speech amounts to criminal activity in and of itself.

Hernandez Santana is entitled to his views on all kinds of issues, including his support for California’s gun control laws and a desire to see more restrictions on our Second Amendment rights.

But if the news media is going to highlight his prolific posts on X, they shouldn’t hide his many comments in support of gun control while highlighting his animosity towards Donald Trump and the current administration. Hernandez Santana isn’t just an “educated liberal”; he’s a staunch advocate for restricting our right to keep and bear arms who, according to authorities, had no qualms about using a gun of his own to target those he disagrees with.

Editor’s Note: The mainstream media continues to deflect, gaslight, spin, and lie about our Second Amendment rights. 

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Huh! (And the toughest too)

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

The Worst U.S. Generals That Nearly Cost Us Our Freedom

Categories
All About Guns COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You have to be kidding, right!?!

I Hunted Wild Hogs with a M249 SAW!

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Don’t shoot we’re Republicans!!!!!!!!

Categories
Born again Cynic! You have to be kidding, right!?!

The Great Betrayal of the Cossacks

Categories
A Victory! You have to be kidding, right!?!

On this one at least the US Taxpayer really got their money’s worth on this one!

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Now I REALLY feel like an old f@rt!

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Thats gotta hurt!

Categories
Cops You have to be kidding, right!?!

You Can’t Make This Stuff Up Written By John Connor

Okay, maybe my life’s been a little different. I guess not too many people have taken advanced scatology studies from bronze-age warriors — how to identify “friend or foe” by takin’ apart their poop with a twig — or had a monkey pee down their shirt collar while leaning against his tree, tryin’ to grab some Zs.

At the time, I didn’t know I was gathering writing material. I just thought I had an interesting job. Fiction can be fascinating, but for sheer maniacal madness and loose screw lunacy, nothin’ beats reality. Here are some examples.

Weird Crime

Are you sick and tired of hearing about how guns commit crimes, and all the ills of man can be traced back to firearms? Historically, guns are relative Johnny-come-latelies in the field of human homicide. And, people bein’ the crafty kill-crazed critters they are, they’re constantly inventing new ways to whack each other without the benefit of powder and slug.

A new favorite of mine comes to us from Houston, Texas. There, Tammy Jean Warner, 42, was recently charged with killing her 58-year-old husband, Michael — by giving him a sherry enema.

Yep. She hooked up two bottles of sherry to an enema tube, pumped Michael to the max, and raised his blood-alcohol level to a lethal .47 percent, killin’ him deader’n a cockroach on the kitchen floor.

She said she did it because a throat ailment left him unable to drink his favorite sherry, and she was just helpin’ him out. She mighta gotten away with it, but the police learned she had burned Michael’s will the month before.

In that document, he had left the bulk of his assets to a daughter from a previous marriage. It seems Tammy wasn’t happy with that. They took another look.

Yeah, you might think that death by alcohol poisoning may be more pleasant than takin’ two 7.62s in the boiler room and losing your attempt to set a record in the “100-Meter Low Crawl With a Sucking Chest Wound,” but dudes, somehow, the mere thought of death by enema gives me the serious willies. I’ll take the incoming, thank you.

From Across the Pond

For sheer silliness in the Great Gun Debacle, you can’t beat our English cousins. You know about the “armed police” in England, right? After disarming the law-abiding citizens and leaving only criminals armed with guns,

Great Britain soon vaulted to the number-one spot among industrialized nations in armed assaults. This made life a bit sticky for the unarmed bobbies, so the Brits recruited and trained some officers to carry guns and deal with firearm-toting bad guys.

The basic premise is that when the regular “unleaded” bobbies step in some deep kimchee, they pull back and whistle up the armed troops. This should have made things jollier in Liverpool, but the problem is, the zoo is still overseen and operated by gun-hating bureaucrats and fuzzywigged liberal judges.

Time after time, legal decisions have come down against those armed police, ruining careers, emptying their bank accounts, and sometimes jailing them with the crooks they’ve fought. Recently, some of ‘em broke under the last straw.

Let The Games Begin

Police had a tip, including name and description, of an alleged armed Irish terrorist who would be exiting a bar carrying a sawn-off shotgun. The tip later proved to be false and apparently maliciously placed, but the confrontation occurred for real.

There was the suspect, carrying a short, wrapped cylindrical object, and although details are sketchy, it appears that he failed to comply with certain instructions, like dropping the packet and putting his hands up. The officers capped him and he later expired. When the scattergun-like object turned out to be a table leg wrapped in newspaper, the games began.

When the first inquest concluded, the officers were ruled justified, based on the fact that they had acted appropriately on the information they had and the situation they encountered.

This, of course, did not sit well with the Warm-‘n-Fuzzies, who felt that since the outcome was bad, the officers must have done something bad. A second inquest resulted in their suspensions, pending charges. That ruling also paved the way for civil suits with the potential to impoverish their great-grandkiddies. The Fuzzies were tickled. The armed police were not. The message was clear.

By the following Tuesday, 120 of London’s 400 armed police had turned in their guns and firearms authorization cards. Carry guns and incur grave risk for a society that wouldn’t back them up? No, thanks. They decided that the courts and bureaucrats were far more dangerous than the armed criminals they might face.

BBC Fuzz

The same week, I reviewed a news article about the explosive growth and “effectiveness” of Britain’s most feared and hated law enforcement agency — the Telly Police.

In England, if you own a TV, it is presumed you watch the BBC, even if you hate that crap and never tune in. Nonetheless, you are legally required to buy an annual “TV license” for about $233, which goes to subsidize BBC’s “politically approved programmes.”

If caught TV-owning without a license, first-time offenders can draw fines of $1,923 or even jail time. Repeat offenders get the Zenith thrown at ‘em, and 20 illegal TV-watchers went to prison last year.

Twenty people hittin’ the joint may seem small, but keep in mind it’s all about the money. If you’re in the Big House, you can’t pay the big bucks.

The real story lies in the fact that TV fee-evasion charges now make up 12 percent of magistrate cases nationwide, 1,000 illegal TV-watchers are caught per day — 380,000 per year — and the Telly Police are now equipped with hand-held electronic devices which can detect TV viewing while TP’s drive or stroll down the street outside.

And yes, Virginia, they do get warrants for “TV searches” based on high-tech sniffery. Nothing like having your public safety priorities in order, right?

All’s peachy unless and until they run into some armed, obstinate dude who refuses to cooperate. Then the bobbies are called. And if they’re met with a gun, they can call, ummm … well, maybe not the armed police. There may not be any around. Maybe “GhostBusters” or something.

Perhaps the suspect could be threatened with the administration of a sherry enema … See what I mean? Who needs an imagination when you’ve got the news?