This is a Winchester Model 92 rifle that someone went to a lot of trouble to look like a Winchester Model 53.
The barrel was replaced with a M53 barrel from 1929, the magazine tube was replaced with a button mag, the markings were ground off the upper tang, the lower tang was replaced with a pistol grip tang, and both stocks were replaced, the buttstock with one having a checkered pistol grip.
When the Model 53 rifles were first made, some used M92 receivers and some had serial numbers from the M92 range, but this receiver was made in 1907, long before the Model 53s were produced. The bore is bright with sharp rifling and no erosion.
Big bore guns are a way of life in Alaska. Whether handgun or rifle the need is the same: stopping large animals quickly. Wild West Guns began building the Co-Pilot lever gun over 20 years ago. The take-down rifle is designed to easily fit in a plane, boat, vehicle, pack, or scabbard and stop the largest of North America’s game.
Shielded rear peep sight and XS WWG front sight add reliable backup for the removable scope.
WWG takes a standard stainless steel 18” barreled Marlin 1895 lever gun and works it over from one end to the other. Assembled, the Co-Pilot’s overall length is 36 ¾ inches. In just a minute’s time, it is in two halves. The longest half is 19 inches, which is small enough to fit in a leather or canvas satchel or pack.
The take-down feature is accomplished by adding a plate to the rear of the barrel half that holds the barrel, forearm and magazine tube assembly, as well as the barrel-mounted scout scope. The plate acts as the mating surface to the machined front of the receiver. The magazine tube is held in place at the muzzle end by a thumb screw threaded into an insert in the bottom of the barrel.
The barrel porting works exceptionally well at taming the muzzle rise.
Unscrewing the thumb screw allows pulling the magazine tube out past the muzzle, which pulls it out of the receiver, allowing the barrel section to unscrew from the receiver. The bottom end of the magazine tube is tapered and acts as a large alignment pin to center the barrel section with the receiver. The clearance between the mating faces of the two sections is almost nonexistent and unnoticeable if you’re not looking for it.
Exacting tolerances ensure fit of the two halves, flawless function, and accuracy.
The barrel threads into the receiver to rigidly hold the two halves together. The magazine tube fits into the recess of the receiver, locking the halves. All the work on the alignment, mating surfaces, and threading enhances the accuracy of the Co-Pilot and makes it a compact travel package.
Barrel mounted scope allows disassembly of rifle without loss of zero.
The work done on the Co-Pilot does not end at the take-down feature, which is just the beginning. To say the action of the Co-Pilot is smooth would be an understatement. With some factory guns, you can almost feel every process happening when you cycle the lever through the range of motion. This is not the case with the Co-Pilot. The action glides through the lever stroke swiftly, smoothly, and reliably. The large cases feed in and out of the action as if they were greased.
I was lucky enough to take the Co-Pilot on a hog hunt and though the hogs were nowhere to be found during the day, I did get to try it out on a couple after darkness fell. During the heat of the moment, while firing three shots at a running hog, I didn’t even notice that I was shooting a lever gun instead of my usual semi-auto. The action is that smooth and reliable.
After downing the second hog I found myself checking the action to make sure I had chambered a fresh round and was ready for another. Both hogs were in the 140-150 pound range and never made it 50 yards before dropping.
The lightning-fast handling nature of the gun made it a pleasure to carry and use for the hunt. At less than eight pounds it was no problem carry for miles of walking, stalking, waiting and watching during the day or for the stalks to the hogs when we located them at night. I guess I need to invest in a .45 caliber suppressor because the thunderous roar that it lets out in the still of the night would make Thor himself tremble.
Friends with cool equipment helped put the Co-Pilot to the hog test.
The Co-Pilot obviously uses a WWG big loop lever, trigger, and ejector. The action has been polished and tuned to give the best performance possible. The trigger broke cleanly at 3 lbs. That’s the kind of trigger that you don’t typically find on lever guns. The fine trigger made breaking shots at the running hogs reflexive rather than a conscious action, and instantly it was ready to shoot again—never a glitch or hang-up of any kind in feeding or ejecting.
WWG scope mount allowed rock-solid mounting of the scope or laser used for night hunting.
The Co-Pilot can be had with a standard handguard or the modified Midwest Industries tactical style as on the test gun. The forearm can be used for mounting lights, lasers or whatever accessories the user needs.
The thick reticle was quick to pick up and excellent for engaging close range targets.
The Co-Pilot utilized a Leupold FX-II 2.5x 28mm Scout style scope. The low power and heavy reticle of the Leupold aren’t made for long distance shooting; they are designed for up-close quick shooting. This scope weighs only 9 ½ ounces. The lightweight helps maintain a nice balance on the rifle and keeps the handling more like an iron sighted gun than a top-heavy scoped one.
Specifications
Caliber: 457 WWG or 45-70
Barrel Length: 18 inch, ported
Weight: 7lbs. 13 oz.
Length Assembled: 36 ¾ in
Length Disassembled- 19 in
Capacity: 6+1
Trigger pull: 3 lbs.
Finish: Stainless Steel with Black Nitride (test gun)
Stock: Composite (tested) or laminated wood
Price from $3277
The heavy coarse reticle doesn’t mean that the Co-Pilot isn’t capable of shooting well. The Co-Pilot shot almost one hole groups at 50 yards with Hornady 250 grain 45-70 LEVERevolution ammunition. The flyer was probably due to the reticle and my focus. The Remington 405 grain bullets shot almost as well the Hornady 45-70 loads.
The test gun was chambered in the SAMMI approved 457 WWG cartridge, a longer variant of the original 45-70 chambering. The 457 WWG packs in some extra punch for those potential close encounters in heavy brush. In addition, the 457 WWG chambering still allows shooting the 45-70 Government cartridge and also single loading 2 1/2 inch 410 shot shells for close range small game or pests.
The Co-Pilot shot some amazing groups with multiple ammunition types and easily hit steel out to 150 yards.
The 250 grain Hornady load, which is sufficient for hunting most game, was actually pleasant to shoot in the Co-Pilot. The barrel porting and Pachmayr Decelerator recoil pad working together even tamed the 350-grain Corbon WWG loads allowing me to shoot reasonable groups. I have certainly shot less comfortable guns and felt that for the energy of the rounds and weight of the rifle it performed very well.
The energy of the Corbon 457 WWG load is something worth a quick look in itself. At 4112 ft-lbs. of muzzle energy, it is in the class with the 300 Weatherby and 338 Winchester Magnum rounds. This is about 2 ½ times the energy of the original slow moving 405 grain 45/70 loads; impressive power in a light-fast rifle.
Even with the low power optic and thick post, hunting accuracy is no problem for the 457 WWG Co-Pilot.
Due to weather and time constraints, the 457 WWG loads were shot for groups as darkness was falling and I know I did not do it justice. I feel I had some variance in getting a consistent hold with the point of the reticle on the target center as the light was fading and this probably accounts for the vertical stringing of the groups. My apologies to the Wild West Team.
Due to the wide range of bullet weights and velocity differences, the point of impact for every load tested was several inches different. So as always be sure to zero with the ammunition you will be using on a hunt and tailor the bullet type to the game you will be shooting.
The difference in length of the high energy 457 WWG rounds and the Hornady brass cases is easily seen here.
The Co-Pilot can be had almost any way you want it, from finely engraved with beautiful wood to finished with the most durable coatings to keep it working in the harshest environments.The gun I tested was a Black Nitride finished stainless steel rifle with a composite buttstock, though mostly they sell stainless with laminated wood stocks carrying the WWG’s logo. You can have it with a ported barrel such as the test gun or without ports and threaded for use with a suppressor. You can literally have it your way.
This no-nonsense performer is ready to hunt anything you are.
Final Thoughts
The Wild West Guns Co-Pilot is a short, light, fast handling, accurate, easily shootable, hammer of a rifle that has an awesomely smooth action, fine trigger and easily disassembles down to a compact travel size package. The workmanship is obvious in the tuning, precision, and assembly of the rifle.
We don’t all have a float plane so it may not be a gun we all need, but if you’re a lever gun fan, it’s surely one you will want. I hate to send it back. This design is all about function and performance.
Townsend Whelen was one of the great American riflemen of the past. He’s one of the people who worked to bring us some of the best of riflery. Germán Salazar has a nice biography of him here. Thewikipedia entry is appallingly brief, but it does tell us that his friends called him “Townie” and that “An expert rifleman with few peers, Whelen could reportedly hit man-sized target at 200 yards using the bolt action, open-sighted M1903 Springfield.30/06 service rifle, scoring six hits in ten seconds flat, and could do it on command.” That’s pretty fast shooting with good accuracy for the speed. I decided to take the challenge up for myself.
Let’s examine the difficulties. I don’t know what they mean by “man-sized target”. If we omit the legs of a man, we might have a target of approximately 36” in height. As far as width, I’m guessing about 24” to the edge of each shoulder. Because Townie was a world class rifleman, let’s assume that his target was a bit smaller, something on the order of 18” x 28”. At 200 yards your accuracy standard should be better than 9 moa. Not hard at all until you factor in the rate of fire.
His rifle was a long action turnbolt, essentially a copy of the Mauser K98. The internal magazine held 5 rounds. Since he fired 6 times, I’m guessing he also had one in the chamber prior to starting. That means that part of his 10 seconds is going to involve working the bolt at least 5 times. Townie was apparently somewhat of an authority on bolt work. Let’s examine that aspect of the problem. The length of pull (LOP) for the 1903 is known as being “short”. I searched for dimensions and came up with “short” everywhere I looked. I’ll call my LOP “long” at 14.25”. With my long LOP I can get by working the bolt while keeping my cheekweld without getting hit in the face by the bolt shroud.
In prone I have trouble reaching the bolt knob, which leaves me working it without using my thumb, or leaning right. Leaning to the side increases the reach and leverage of the hand working the bolt. For an odd task such firing rapidly at a single target from a relatively long (in combat terms) distance, the faster technique must be favored at the expense of maintaining a perfect sight picture throughout the bolt cycling.
I’m not sure exactly why, call it rifleman’s instinct, but for some reason I assumed without thinking about it that Townie would have used the prone position for this feat of skill. I didn’t question that assumption until I started working at it. Now I’m not sure if another position would better balance the accuracy and speed needed for this specific skill.I’m still working it in prone, but leaving my options open.
If we can take the wikipedia entry at face value (it is the internet after all, what could go wrong?), Townie was using open sights. This would seem to place him at a disadvantage to an aperture sight or optic. I don’t think this would have been too great a disadvantage to him in this case. First, he doesn’t need to be close to the rear sight, as when using an aperture, so it gives him enough eye relief to have plenty of “bolt relief”. Secondly, once he has his NPA, he really doesn’t need to realign his sights; he just needs to verify that his sight picture is still acceptable. Note that all you need is a hit; it doesn’t need to be a perfect shot. Hitting a “man size” target at 200 yards, even with open sights, is not too much of a problem in the way of sighting.
After a lot of guessing based on a sentence from a Wikipedia article, I found one of his books at the library. He never mentioned “man sized target” or 6 shots in 10 seconds, but he did mention, in a discussion of bolt action rifles that “Six shots in 12 seconds, all of the striking within a 20 inch bull’s eye at 200 yards was a common and not particularly remarkable performance on the part of members of the Army Infantry Rifle team during the years 1907 to 1909, with the Springfield rifle which has a Mauser type of mechanism” (The Hunting Rifle; 39).
When I originally read about this, I thought, “Cool, something else to try, then write about.” I knew that I currently was not able to do it, so it gives an opportunity for improvement. The problem for me would be to find a way to operate the bolt in a slung prone position as quickly as I could in offhand.
My equipment is a little bit different than Townie’s. I don’t own a 1903, or I would try it with one. I have #1 (my Sako 75). Like the 1903, it’s chambered in 30-06. The action length is similar. The differences would be that the Sako has a shorter bolt lift. I also have a scope instead of open sights. This is a big advantage that I can’t really do anything about. The only thing that comes to mind is to reduce the size of the target.
I found that one of the main problems I had in live fire was that the butt has a tendency to slip from the shoulder. Townie had some advice for me. One tip was to utilize the support hand to pull the butt into the shoulder while working the bolt. Good. That will help. Another tip was to use the cheek to press into the rifle. I had already stumbled into that for offhand, but had not thought to apply it here. Another tip was to wet the stock so that it will adhere slightly to the shoulder. Interesting…
I spent a couple weeks dry firing to get my speed together in prone with the sling. This was not a fast combination up to this point, but I figured out what I needed to do to get the bolt going, which was basically to compromise my position after each shot. Luckily, this was not a super precise shot.
I used the metronome to build my speed in dry fire. I got up to about 72 BPM. I wasn’t sure if this was fast enough. I had a feeling that I might not make the 10 second time limit, but that it would be close. I wanted to at least make the 12 second limit that I had read about in Townie’s book.
I tried a couple of practice runs at 100 yards on a 10” paper plate. On about shot 4, the butt would slip out of the shoulder pocket. My accuracy was fine, just under 4”, but my time was a bit over. I tried to work on the slipping problem in dry fire after this.
My target at 200 yards was steel, so I could document this in video and give the viewer instant feedback. The target is a humanoid steel target approximately 13” wide, 23” from top of the head to bottom of target, and approximately 18.5” in height not counting the head, which was not part of my intended target. I was shooting #1, my Sako 75 Hunter, chambered in 30-06 Springfield. My Leupold Vari-X 3 was set to the minimum zoom setting, ~3.5. I was using a TAB gear standard sling. I had 5 rounds in the mag and one in the chamber. On my first run, the butt slipped again on shot 4. I only had a little daylight, a little time, and enough ammo for one more run. I then remembered that one of Townie’s tips was to wet the shoulder to butt interface. Check out my bottle of Aquafina in the following video:
You can time it like I did and it should come out to just over 11 seconds from the 1st shot to the 6th. All shots hit steel. I didn’t measure my group at the time, but from a photo, it appears as though it’s approximately 9.75”, which would make it in the ballpark of 4.6 MOA.
A photo of me and my buddy Steele. About the new face: a reader, who is also a well respected rifleman, suggested something more dignified than blacking my face out. Ask, and you shall receive…
Obviously this is over the 10 second limit, but according to Townie it’s good enough to hang with him on his team. Also, figure in that I’m not the commander of the Frankford Arsenal or a member of an armed forces shooting team, and there you have it. It was the gap between shots 1 and 2, and 4 and 5 that got me. I tend to be a little slow out the gate, and the bolt work following shot 4 was slightly flubbed. Even if I’d have gotten it, I can’t do it “on command” yet.
Watching the video is interesting for me, because I clearly break my cheekweld. I don’t notice this in practice, in fact I can still see through the scope. I had also expected more body movement (reaching for the bolt knob) than there actually is. I recommend recording a video of yourself so you can nitpick.
Here’s the rating system breakdown for a clean run:
Over 30 seconds: Why did you even try this, get to workin’ that bolt son!
Over 20 seconds: See above.
Over 15 seconds: More dry fire in the future for you I see, hmm, yes.
Over 12 seconds: Nice try kid.
Over 10 seconds: He’s good… with my help he could be the best
Under 10 seconds: May your shooting career be glorious and your wikipedia
entry brief, Mister Rifleman!
Under 7 seconds: STANGSKYTER!!!
Here’s someone who can get 6 off in under 7 seconds, then reload and fire another 2 under 10 seconds, with a higher degree of accuracy than I was trying for:
What’s the point of all this? It’s fun, and it’s a challenge. Is it worth it to get to the stangskyting level? Not for me. Is it useful? That’s a better question to ask in order to guide our practice. Here’s an easy test question to get to the bottom of this: Ten crows are sitting around a dumpster. You shoot one. How many are left around the dumpster? If you answered 9 your math is fine but your common sense needs work. The practice of firing rapid fire at a single target is really only useful in order to develop the consistency to be assured that your first shot is going to hit, and the speed to be ready for a second shot. That’s really it. The first shot is worth more than all the others combined.
I may revisit this type of shooting, but for now I’ll be moving on to less conventional, more practical type shooting.
It’s a banner day for pump shotguns.
We have waited a long time for this. Today, I am happy to report about the greatest leap forward in pump shotguns I have seen in my lifetime. This miracle of engineering is named the Remington 870 DM (Detachable Magazine). This has been a long time coming, and I am beyond excited to see it come from Big Green.
As an American, we tend to fall into one of two camps with pump guns. Either you are a Remington 870 fan, or a Mossberg 500 fan, which usually comes down to where you like the safety. I have been in the Remington camp since an early age. I don’t hate Mossbergs. I just like Remington better. And God knows Remington needed a win. There have been more than a few debacles over the last few years, some of which I have reviewed for GunsAmerica. Because of my longstanding love of the 870, I expect a lot from Big Green. And today, it looks like they delivered.
New Age for the Remington 870
Full disclosure, this gun has my full faith not because I pulled it out of the box and shot a couple rounds. Let’s be honest, such a radical departure for a pump gun requires more in-depth testing than a few days. I can say without question this shotgun will run because I did some of the Beta testings with it months ago. Given my reputation for speaking the truth, I told Remington from day one I would be beating the absolute living shit out of this gun if they wanted my stamp of approval.
As fast as I could shoot them, I burned up 600 rounds of mixed shells. Remington must’ve taken my previous review personally because over half of it was high brass pheasant loads. I did all kinds of terrible things to that gun. I tried to melt the plastic magazine follower. I pumped it by dropping it on the ground from eye level. I tossed it into a pond to cool it off so I could keep going. And it didn’t hiccup on me once.
Time will tell, but I think Remington has batted one out of the park here.
870 DM Tactical/Predator
Article Continues Below
I will refrain from describing a Remington 870 here. If you haven’t seen one, welcome to the United States. We also have grocery stores, air conditioning, and horse-less carriages you might want to check out.
SPECS — 870 DM
Type: Magazine-fed pump shotgun
Capacity: 6-Round Detachable Magazine
Features: Tactical Corn-cob forend
Barrel: 18.5 in. /w extended ported tactical choke
Sights: XS Steel (front); Ghost Ring (rear)
MSRP: $529
870 DM Magpul
Type: Magazine-fed pump shotgun
Capacity: 6-Round Detachable Magazine
Features: Magpul MOE M-LOK forend
Barrel: 18.5 in. /w extended ported tactical choke
Sights: XS Steel (front); Ghost Ring (rear)
MSRP: $799
870 DM Tactical/Predator
Type: Magazine-fed pump shotgun
Capacity: 3 & 6-Round Detachable Magazine
Features: Overmolded SurShot Thumbhole Stock w/ SuperCell Recoil Pad
Barrel: 18.5 in. /w two Trulock Extended Chokes (Boar Blaster & Turkey/Predator)
Sights: XS Steel (front); Ghost Ring (rear)
Finish: Kryptek Highlander Camo
MSRP: $799
870 DM TAC-14
Type: Magazine-fed pump shotgun
Capacity: 6-Round Detachable Magazine
Features: Shockwave Grip & Magpul Forend
Barrel: 14 in.
Sights: Bead sight
MSRP: $559
There are going to be many configurations available for the new 870DM, in the future probably as many as there are now for 870 regulars. We received a single test model, and I can’t find a single fault in the choices made for the tactical version. The furniture is Magpul, a fantastic choice.
A few years back, the Magpul 870 dress up kit made some serious waves. The stock is a perfect length out of the box for me and uses spacers to change the length of pull. Drop two spacers, and you are set up for shooting while wearing armor. The stock is ambidextrous, with sling attachment points on both sides. The angle of the grip is ergonomically improved, and in my opinion is better than a true pistol grip. The fore end feels great in the hand, has a hand stop at either end for rapid manipulation, and is M-LOK compatible for accessories.
Tactical Versions
The tactical version features an 18.5-inch barrel, to keep us on the legal side. This is obviously the best choice if you don’t want to deal with a Short Barrel Shotgun NFA ordeal, and I don’t. Neither do most people. Preinstalled is a tactical breacher choke in cylinder bore. This choke not only makes it easier to plant the barrel for blasting doorknobs, it is ported to help with recoil. A nice feature in a dedicated tactical gun. Instead of the usual bead front with a prayer for a rear, Remington installed XS ghost ring sights.
Maybe not ideal for flying birds, but they worked great for slugs and steel target engagements. If you have ever needed to take a rifle type shot with a shotgun, you know what a necessity a full set of sights are. Excellent choice Remington. I am impressed. Also in the positive category, this model comes with a Picatinny rail mounted on top of the receiver. The iron sights are nice, but most of us prefer a red dot. The 870DM is ready to accept your favorite holographic out of the box.
Magazines
Obviously, the big question is, “ How do the magazines work?”. Because this is a pump action, the traditional tube under the barrel remains. The pump has to have something to slide on, so why change this? The difference is, it’s no longer a magazine tube. Over the top of the old bottom load port is what looks like an overgrown magazine well. This is bolted on through the receiver, taking the place of what was previously one of the trigger pins.
The magazine fits in here, with the magazine retaining parts covering the old tube entrance. So basically, the magazine takes the place of the lifter and feeds shells directly to the bolt when you pump the gun. Overall, it adds a little bit of weight, but also distributes it in a different way. A fully loaded gun is no longer front heavy, at the cost of a few ounces of metal added to the middle. Because the magazine well would have almost covered the old action release lever, a new oversized lever takes its place. The same spot, so if you are an 870 shooter, the controls are familiar. In front of the magazine is a huge magazine release button. Exactly the opposite of an AK-47 magazine release as far as positioning goes. It works well but does require a bit of practice due to its location.
The magazines themselves are also well thought out. The strength of any weapon is the magazine that feeds it. There is a reason so many other weapons use Glock or AR-15 magazines, and it isn’t just popularity. Those designs have proven to be extremely reliable and durable, ask anyone with a pre-assault weapons ban stack. I have magazines that old I still use, and so do many others. Magazine design is extremely important, especially in a platform that has never been done. The 870 DM magazine is like nothing else, which tells us Big Green thought this through. The mag is all steel, and not some thin sheet hunk of garbage. There is some heft to it, and in this case, I see that as a good thing. The bottom half of the magazine has a thick overlay of plastic, both to increase grip ability and insulate the internals from shock when dropped. The spring is resilient, it takes some force to load to capacity. From what I see so far, I give Remington an A+ on magazine design for this one.
Why is this design so novel?
So why exactly am I so hot and bothered by this new 870 DM? Aren’t I the same guy that said less than 2 years ago I prefer rifles for home defense and tactical use? Yes, I am. And generally speaking, if you have a choice, I stand by that. But there are many reasons to like this new gun.
For starters, I said I like rifles better than shotguns, but many people are still going to prefer a shotgun. You’re a grown assed man or woman, that is your choice. I prefer light coffee too, we are all entitled to our opinion. But this gun being magazine fed pretty much negates my reloading argument. You can reload this shotgun just as fast as you can your AR, or close enough to make the difference moot. Magazine fed also means you can change the type of shells in the gun without some 17 step tactical ninja move that only works on the range, and only at the best of times then. Pretty handy for police officers, that might need to go from riot rounds to lethal ones quickly. Or for tactical work, from buckshot to slugs quickly. The hardest part of any tactical shotgun course prior to this was keeping your beast fed. That is no longer an issue.
Saftey First Another Reason to Love the 870 DM
The other benefits are more specialized, but they do matter. When I was teaching CQB, the hardest part of the shotgun instruction was manual of arms. Soldiers pretty much only use shotguns for breaching doors. ( By the way, those guns were Remington 870’s too.) This is probably hysterical to the cops and duck hunters in our audience, but most SF soldiers have never shot a shotgun when they show up to CQB school. Hell, the first gun I ever bought was an 870, and I was far from an expert by the time I started kicking doors. The point is, if you really think about it, using a pump shotgun requires a lot of steps.
SOP where I taught, and most units I know of, was to run a shotgun with a dry husk in the chamber. That is cruiser ready for you LE guys. Tube loaded, chamber empty, trigger pulled on the empty, safety off. That way when you need to use it, all you do is rack the pump, shoot, and off you go. If you accidentally chamber a live round, safety goes on, stow the gun, and get it back to dry husk when you have time. Obviously, a lot can go wrong. I saw more negligent discharges with shotguns than any other three weapons put together. The magazine fed version will make this much easier on everyone. Drop magazine. Set up gun. Insert magazine. Now you are good to go. And clearing the weapon is now extremely similar to clearing an M-4.
Current Offerings
Magazines are currently a 6 round capacity, but I bet we see 10 and 3 very soon. This is another huge benefit to the soldier. Our breaching guns were extremely short, the tubes held 3. Looking at the new magazine, 3 would almost be a flush fit on the mag well, which is awesome. I, and many of my brethren have been to “block parties” in the GWOT that lasted all night. I preferred to call that trick or treating, but block party won the naming convention. Mountains of doors blown, and reloading the breach gun gets old quick. It would be awesome to have the 3 capacity for normal days, and go to 10 for the nights that get crazy. The 870 DM ships with 1 magazine, availability of extras not known at this time.
This also has a benefit for the young guy that needs an all-purpose gun. Current retail on the 870 DM is about $700, but that is still cheaper than a good rifle. Combine that with the fact that many states prohibit rifles for hunting, and you see why those light on cash might only have a 12 gauge. It does triple duty for deer, ducks, and home defense. The new 870 DM being magazine fed makes it a much better choice for the defensive role and propels it to a viable combat weapon. Not my first choice, but it would get the job done better than it’s predecessors.
Lasting Impressions
This is a great day for 870 fans, and I am happy to find myself applauding Remington. This gun works great, the magazine system is great, and shooting this thing is guaranteed to make you smile. The DM model is like a boyhood dream come true. This looks like a turning point for Big Green, and I recommend you get one of these quick. No way they are going to be able to keep up with the demand the 870DM creates.
To purchase a Remington 870 on GunsAmerica, click here.
For more information about Remington shotguns, click here.