
Author: Grumpy
Discovering old writings by top handgunners in their day is always educational for many reasons. When I recently ran across some very old magazines from nearly 50 years ago in a corner office, the honest-to-goodness first story to grab my attention was by the late Skeeter Skelton extolling the virtues of — wait for it — the Colt Diamondback.
Here’s a dandy — in my humble opinion — little sixgun which some folks have wrongly disdained as being a little on the delicate side for reasons I cannot fathom. Reading his decades-old article, it appears Skelton didn’t share that opinion either, as he described this particular Colt as having “performed beautifully.”
“Properly loaded,” Skelton observed at the time, “the .38 Diamondback is good medicine for medium animals such as coyotes, porcupines, and javelina out to 75 yards or so.”
He said the Diamondback “is the epitome of light trail guns.” I’ve written essentially the same thing, and have come to really enjoy packing my 4-inch specimen along in the woods when a .38 Special might come in handy for potting a rabbit or putting the hurt on a coyote. I also knocked together an IWB holster for concealed carry.
More than a year ago, I shared the story of my Diamondback acquisition with readers. It happened the same week my mother passed more than ten years ago, and I recalled the transaction gave me something else to think about during a difficult time. Things like that get some people through.
As noted by the late Mr. Skelton, who I met briefly at the National Rifle Association convention in Seattle in 1985 — a pleasant fellow capable of carrying on a quick conversation in a noisy exhibit hall — the Diamondback was a “modernized, deluxe version of the Police Positive Special.” That gun “evolved” into the Detective Special, he wrote, and I’ve always considered the “D-frame” Diamondback to be a beefed-up Dick Special with adjustable sights and an eye-catching full underlug barrel topped by the vent rib to capitalize on the eye candy appeal of the legendary Colt Python.
Empty, this sixgun weights only 28.5 ounces, and I’ll say with no misgivings it’s the lightest 28 ½-ounce wheelgun I’ve ever carried. Maybe it’s because the Diamondback (when is Colt going to reintroduce this gem?) is very well balanced.
Diamondback owners know this revolver has a shortened butt frame, around which the factory and aftermarket grip makers have wrapped some remarkably functional grips.
Many years ago, I worked up a .38 Special load using 4.7 grains of HP-38 pushing a 125-grain JHP at about 900 fps, initially to use in my 6-inch Model 19 Smith & Wesson, but it turns out this round works rather well in my little snake gun as well. Recoil is manageable, and with an ample sight radius, it is satisfactorily accurate for small game.
The ‘Bad Rap’
Maybe the bad rap about the Diamondback is that it won’t take a pounding with hot loads, and let’s be honest: some guys just can’t resist pushing the envelope to see how much of a “boom!” they can get out of a revolver.
I’ve known such people and they make me nervous because one never knows when one of their hot loads is going to disintegrate a handgun while I’m standing close enough to get hurt. I’m quite content with my mid-range .38 Special loads, which — based on my reading of Hodgdon’s Annual Manual — can also be produced with such propellants as AutoComp, Titegroup and CFE Pistol. I’ll be a happy camper if I can conk a cottontail for the winter pot.
Let’s talk a moment about handloading for the .38 Special. Way too many people want that +P power in their sidearm when it’s a bad idea. A lot of older handguns don’t handle +P pressures, but one can load up completely adequate standard pressure loads that work just fine, thanks to modern bullet design and composition.
There are some sizzling loads, which push 110-grain bullets above 1,110 fps, and that kind of punch is going to immediately get so — or someone’s — undivided attention. One caveat here is that such loads, even within acceptable pressures, are going to have very snappy recoil, and I’m being polite. In a lightweight such as the Diamondback, recoil is no small concern.
My recommendation for anyone loading the .38 Special for older medium or light-framed revolvers is to consult more than one reloading manual. You will find several load suggestions and DO NOT EXCEED them.
Not long after obtaining my Diamondback, I pulled the factory grips and installed a set of Detective grips crafted by my friend Rod Herrett. These are superb grips for concealed carry and they fit my hand very well, and also help tame recoil.
Every ammunition company offers standard pressure loads in .38 Special, which will work just fine in the Diamondback or similar revolvers.
Charles Allan “Skeeter” Skelton was one of the premier gunwriters of his era. During his life, he served in the Marine Corps, worked as a lawman at various levels including a term as sheriff of Deaf Smith County, Texas. He was a masterful storyteller and having grown into early adulthood reading his articles, it was a treat to meet him back in ’85. Sadly, he passed on less than three years later, far too early for someone with his wit and wisdom. I would have dearly enjoyed spending more time chatting with him.
Stumbling across his Diamondback essay was a delight. He covered all the bases, including felt recoil, powder selection for handloads, his recommendation that the action be smoothed a bit, his dislike of the hammer size because it pinched his hand, and other points. He didn’t care for the factory grips, considering them too large for the size of the gun.
Back to the Present
It’s always informative to see the monthly FBI/NICS check data, particularly because the numbers repeatedly demonstrate America hasn’t given up on the right to keep and bear arms.
According to data for April, the National Instant Check System (NICS) ran a total of 2,607,477 checks, though readers are reminded the statistic does not represent the number of firearms sold.
For that information, we always turn to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, which invariably produces an “NSSF-adjusted” figure more closely reflecting the number of actual gun transactions that did occur. In this case, the NSSF-adjusted figure for April, according to Mark Oliva, public affairs director for the organization, was 1,359,908.
Any way one looks at that number, it is significant. Over the past two years, U.S. citizens have purchased a lot of guns. There is no small irony this surge in gun buying began as the 2020 election loomed and the Democrat in that race was very public about his plan to ratchet down on Second Amendment rights. Gun sales were fueled by the “defund police” movement, the summer of rioting in 2020 and an uncertain future. They stay healthy because Joe Biden has not abandoned his plan to curtail gun rights, and this summer may be his last opportunity to advance that agenda.
Fatal Error
When a man identified as Roman Rodriguez allegedly broke into the San Antonio, Texas home of a mom with three children inside, the last thing he probably expected was that this was the last thing he would ever do.
According to Fox News, the mom heard someone breaking in, and instead of panic, she became her own first responder. She reportedly grabbed a gun and shot the intruder twice in the chest. Police found him sitting in a chair in the backyard, and he subsequently died at a local hospital.
While other news agencies treated the shooting with some objectivity, the New York Post headlined its report thusly: “Texas mom guns down home intruder as kids sleep: cops.”
The final paragraph in the Post’s story: “The probe continues, but the unidentified homeowner is not facing charges because of the so-called Castle Doctrine, which allows a person to use force against an intruder who breaks into their home, News 4 San Antonio reported.”
In Memoriam: John Ross
John Ross authored what has become an “underground” classic novel, “Unintended Consequences,” more than two decades ago, weaving together a fantasy plot with actual historical facts relating to the gun control crusade in the U.S.
The 860-plus page novel grabbed the gun rights movement with a tale of resistance to government overreach. I finished the final ten chapters while stuck at an airport overnight in Michigan, grounded by a storm enroute to that year’s National Rifle Association convention in Charlotte, N.C.
I spoke only once with Ross, via telephone, at the time tracking down a rumor he was working on a sequel. As I recall, it was a pleasant, albeit brief, chat.
Ross passed away suddenly on April 29. He was 64.
Born June 17, 1957, he was a graduate of John Burroughs High School in Ladue in 1974 and attended Amherst College in Massachusetts, graduating in 1979 with a B.A. in English. He worked for the E.F. Hutton company as a broker for about ten years, and then took up full-time writing. According to a short obituary, he was a private pilot, firearms expert, instructor and activist.
OLD SCHOOL — BUT STILL A TOP-DOG!
Live long enough and you’ll see many changes. For example I just read at least two Apache warriors who rode with Geronimo died in car wrecks in later life. Who’d a thought? When guys like me and John Taffin and Clint Smith were young, the .357 Magnum was by far the most famous of revolver cartridges. Times and things change, don’t they?
Younger folks today may not realize it, but in the 1960s you couldn’t just walk into any gun store and have your pick of all the handguns listed in manufacturers’ catalogs. Perhaps the shortage was caused by the Vietnam War, but new double-action Colt and Smith & Wesson .357 Magnum revolvers were nigh on impossible to find. That made me crave one. Finally in 1969, I bought a used S&W Model 28 “Highway Patrolman” with 6″ barrel.
In the early 1970s, and joyfully free from college, I began traveling about the west and actually packing a handgun on my person at times. That caused me to replace the heavy Model 28 with a lighter Model 19 .357, also with 6″ barrel. That .357 traveled thousands of miles with me, both on horseback and in vehicles, and was fired tens of thousands of rounds. I don’t think I have shot any handgun more accurately. At one cow-pasture turkey shoot in 1977 I came away with four “Butterballs.” I’m ashamed today because I cannot remember what eventually became of it.
Some Background
The .357 Magnum was developed primarily as a result of troubled times in this country. Introduced in 1935 by Smith & Wesson, it actually had its roots about 5 years earlier. During prohibition and the Great Depression crime became an epidemic. Much of it entailed automobiles chases. Most cops in 1930 carried .38 Special revolvers and their 158-gr. lead roundnose bullets at about 850 fps were near helpless against stout steel as then used in vehicle construction. Those bullets often did not even penetrate car window glass.
Higher velocity for handguns was considered the answer. As early as 1929 Colt put the .38 Super with 130-gr. FMJ bullet at over 1,200 fps in their Model 1911 autoloader. Smith & Wesson’s tact was to make the .38 Special better. They introduced .38 Special caliber revolvers built on their large N-frame, normally used for .44 and .45 caliber rounds. For those big .38s a factory load headstamped “.38-44” was introduced. They looked exactly like ordinary .38 Special loads, even the same 158-gr. lead bullet, but were moving 300 fps faster. They were not meant for firing in smaller .38 Special handguns made by either S&W or Colt, but the latter company’s New Service and Single Action Army .38 Special sixguns were strong enough for them. What a wonderful era it must have been when gun manufacturers could rely on the cognitive ability of their customers to put the proper ammunition in their revolvers!
Still, the .38 Super and .38-44 were simply not enough. There was a general consensus handguns needed more power. Not only so law enforcement would have better results fighting crime, but also because somebody even got the far-fetched idea handguns could be used for big-game hunting. Smith & Wesson had the perfect vehicle for such a cartridge with their N-frames.
Winchester was put to work developing the new cartridge. Not wanting to trust too much in cognitive ability factors, the .38 Special’s case length was increased from 1.16″ to 1.29″ precluding their entering chambers of weaker guns. The new cartridge was named .357 S&W Magnum and initial velocity was rated at 1,515 fps with 158-gr. bullets, according to the History of Smith & Wesson by Roy Jinks.
The .357 Magnum
From its introduction in 1935, this revolver was simply known as the “.357 Magnum.” When the company adopted model numbers in 1957 it became the Model 27. The idea at the Smith & Wesson factory between 1935 and 1938 was for .357 Magnum revolvers to be special handguns. They got extra finish, and buyers could order any length barrel between 3½” and 8¾”. Each revolver was registered with the company and sold with a certificate saying so. Price was also special at $60, when no other S&W handgun sold for more than $45. That did not stop purchasers, even in the midst of a depression. By 1938 S&W had sold 5,500 Registered Magnums. In that year they stopped the “registered” gambit, but still manufactured .357 Magnums to the highest standards. Another 1,100 were made before production ceased due to World War II.
Colt was quick to recognize a good thing and soon began chambering both New Service and SAA models for the .357 Magnum. Colt dropped SAAs in 1941 and New Services in 1944, but got back on the .357 Magnum track in 1953, first with a model named Trooper. In 1955 the Python appeared. It was considered Colt’s top-of-the-line sixgun for decades. SAA reintroduction happened in 1955, but .357 Magnum wasn’t offered again until 1960. By the time I could walk into a gun store, plunk down money and my driver’s license to prove I was 21 years of age, Colt only made SAAs as .45s and .357s. The very first handgun I ever acquired over a gun store counter was a Colt .357 Magnum SAA with 4¾” barrel. I sold that Colt .357 Magnum twice, but bought it back twice.
The “.357 Magnum” was reintroduced in 1948, and Smith & Wesson eventually saw some folks were more interested in shooting than paying for exquisite finish. In 1954 they introduced the Highway Patrolman, which was merely a less finished version of the “.357 Magnum.” Also at that time they decided .357 Magnums could be accommodated in a slightly beefed-up K-frame revolver, which they named Combat Magnum. These two newer .357s became Model 28s and Model 19s in 1957.
Handloading
It’s been written by others early .357 Magnum factory loads were responsible for more new handloaders than any other cartridge development. I think it’s true because the soft-lead-swaged bullets used by ammunition factories lead-fouled revolver barrels horribly. Good cast bullets poured of a reasonably hard alloy and gas checked easily alleviated the problem. From my very first day as a .357 Magnum shooter I was a .357 Magnum handloader using my own homecast bullets. Quite a bit of my shooting was also done with .38 Special loads, although eventually I decided best accuracy came with full length .357 cases because bullets didn’t have so far to travel before engaging the barrel’s forcing cone.
In fact, the very first article I wrote for American Handgunner, appearing in the spring of 1981, concerned building target loads for .357 Magnum revolvers. What I did was couple deep-seated 148-grain full wadcutter bullets (Lyman #358091) with 4.0 grains of Bullseye powder. Seated deeply, wadcutter bullets ate up case capacity, in turn making ballistics very consistent with light powder charges. Groups from a variety of Smith & Wesson pistols were mere ragged holes at 25 yards.
Other than for the purpose of supplying data for magazine articles, there was only one other .357 Magnum handload for me. It used any 150- to 160-grain semiwadcutter bullet over 14.5 grs. of 2400. Velocity from 4″ to 6″ barrels ran about 1,250 to 1,350 fps.
Duke’s .357s Today
Scanning my lifelong notes I found over two-dozen .357 Magnum handguns have passed through my hands in the past 44 years — only three stuck. One is the Colt SAA mentioned before, which brings us to an interesting tidbit on Colt .38/.357 barrels. I have a Colt factory specification sheet dated 1922. It gives groove diameter of .38 Special barrels as minimum of .353″ and maximum of .354″. Slugging my 1970 vintage SAA’s barrel revealed it to be exactly .354″. No wonder it spit lead with those .358″ bullets I always shot!
Another of my .357s should never have been one in the first place. That is S&W’s little Model 360, a 12-ounce, scandium-frame 5-shooter. Shooting .357s in it will damage your hand! Then there’s one given to me by a friend a few years back. It’s one of those exquisite S&W .357 Magnums, factory lettering to 1939. It even has someone’s name engraved on it. The factory letter says he ordered an identical pair. Its barrel length is 6½” and its custom hammer is cocked slightly to the left, making it easier to reach when firing single action.
As things stand now, I’ll not be buying anymore .357 Magnum revolvers. Mine cover my needs and desires. In essence, I grew up with .357 Magnum revolvers so I’ll never turn my back on them.





























































