Author: Grumpy
Skeeter’s Dream Gun
Skeeter’s handgun potpourri results in an attractive, effective gun designed for lifetime service.
|
The editor of this fine magazine has posed an intriguing problem: If the facilities of the great handgun manufacturers were thrown at my disposal to create one handgun to keep and use for the rest of my days, what would my tastes combined with the skills of the designers produce?
I have no ideas for a new cartridge that would be feasible with existing propellants, so the round would have to be one that is already in the book. My hunting and law enforcement work would dictate that it be a powerful load, and one that is readily obtainable everywhere. I would want to reload for my new gun, so plentiful brass and long case life would be factors.
No automatic cartridge is as powerful as the .357 Magnum. The autos throw their brass around a bit too promiscuously to please the handloader. Although production autoloaders are generally less accurate than good revolvers, this is not an issue here because I am planning a tool room job, and the auto could certainly be brought up to top accuracy if it were otherwise acceptable.
It’s no secret that I am fond of single-action revolvers, but a double action has a slight edge as an all-purpose gun. My .357 will be a double action. The DA .357 sixguns now available are all excellent, and I could live with any of ’em if I had to, but there is always room for a little improvement.
For many years I carried the standard Smith & Wesson heavyweight Model 27, fitted out with a 5-inch barrel, 0.1-inch front sight, and Roper grips that were tailored to my hand. Over the seasons I had a total of four of these guns put together to the same specifications, and fine pieces of machinery they were.
Five or six years ago I stated that if I could have only one gun, it would be a Model 27 S&W. This view has relaxed somewhat, and I now more frequently find myself carrying a Model 19 S&W Combat Magnum.
When the Combat Magnum .357 was first introduced more than 10 years ago, I didn’t care much for it. It recoiled more with heavy loads, and the smaller diameter cylinder didn’t give a boost to fast double-action shooting as did the massive cylinder of the older Model 27. Too, when the little revolver first appeared, many shooters had their doubts about its ability to stand up under continued firing of heavy loads.
These fears proved groundless, and the Model 19 is accepted as being as sturdy as any other Magnum when loads within the normal pressure limits of the .357 are used.
My dream gun prototype would have a slightly larger frame and heavier cylinder than the Model 19, mainly to give it a little extra weight to dampen recoil. The frame of the Colt Python is that of Colt’s ancient .41 Long Colt double action and is about right in bulk and weight.
I don’t care for the Colt’s lack of a front cylinder latch and would employ the Smith & Wesson front and rear latch. Some nitpickers claim that the counterclockwise rotation of the S&W cylinder causes the movement of the hand to push the cylinder against its latches, eventually loosening the crane, and that a Colt locks the cylinder in place more tightly because the hand pushes the cylinder toward lock position. I have never seen any tangible evidence to this theory, but as a concession to those who believe in it, I will make my cylinder rotate clockwise.
This will require some changes in the lockwork. The S&W system of a separate trigger rebound spring assembly lends to smoothness of trigger pull, so let’s retain that. I have never broken a mainspring in an S&W, and their leaf springs are certainly smoother than the coil mainsprings in their pocket revolvers. Still, I think Bill Ruger’s idea for an all-coil-spring interior in his single action has produced the most trouble-free revolver yet, so I’ll go the same route. Surely, if they put their minds to it, my gun designers can conjure up a coil mainspring assembly that is smooth on double action.
Rounding out the inner workings of my hybrid, I would adopt the rebounding firing pin of the Colt Python and Ruger Blackhawk. This is a better deal for the handling of hot loads and prevents anyone trying to use your gun’s hammer for a leather punch.
The grip straps of the frame will have to be altered. This feature of our centerfire revolver frames hasn’t changed in this century. The few efforts made to fashion a better-feeling gun handle have produced bulky “target” stocks that simply cover up the poor profile of the steel straps.
High Standard had the right idea when it carved the little Sentinel 22. Instead of the usual dished-out arch behind the trigger guard that lets the fist grab much too deeply, leaving the third finger prey to the raps of the guard, the Sentinel’s strap comes into the guard at a much lower point, lowering the grip, protecting the knuckle, and leaving the trigger finger pulling from a more natural angle. This in turn allows the use of much smaller, more attractive grips and is an altogether comfortable handle. But even the High Standard should fill in more of the gap between the guard and the strap.
The backstrap of the Colt doesn’t have the pronounced inward curve at its top that the S&W does, and I prefer this. Although the heel of my palm is quite fleshy, I find that it tends to slide over this depression in the S&W backstrap, especially when Magnum ammo is fired. Also, I have somewhat better control when the space is filled by custom stocks that are joined behind the backstrap.
My grip frame will be lowered behind the guard, with a slight forward flare at the bottom of the frontstrap. The backstrap will approximate that of the Colt DA, perhaps toeing forward slightly at its bottom as does the old Colt Shooting Master.
I’ve never been completely satisfied with our selection of revolver barrels. The barrels of the S&W Model 27 and Highway Patrolman magnums are too thin and light for so heavy a gun, leaving a preponderance of weight in the rear and being conducive to unnecessary sight wiggle.
Colt first brought out a large diameter “gas pipe” tube for its .38 Officer’s Model Target, then later carried it over to a special lot of U.S. Border Patrol 4-inch Official Police .38s made up for the immigration service. When it was finally adapted to the Python, this big barrel was gussied up with a full-length lug under its belly to enclose the extractor rod and a ventilated rib. The result is pleasingly muzzle heavy but has a cluttered look.
S&W’s Combat Magnum is made with a choice of 2½-, 4-, or 6-inch barrels, and these are of the most handsome configuration. For both appearance and the desirable heaviness for good pointing, these bulky barrels lack only two things I want–even more diameter and weight and a 5-inch length. This length has been my favorite for maximum in power and sight radius while staying within reasonable bounds for a revolver to be carried in a holster.
The Baughman ramp front sight on S&W guns leaves little to be desired. I prefer the plain, blued style of 0.1-inch width. The S&W Micrometer rear is also excellent. It rides closer to the axis of the bore than most other models and, once the corners of the rear leaf are rounded, is less prone to catch on clothing.
My hammer and trigger will be conservative. The hammerspur will be no wider than the remainder of the part and will bear checkering that is coarse but not sharp enough to make the thumb sore when put through long strings of dry fire. These great, wide platforms called “target” hammers are no surer or faster for single-action work once you’ve mastered the narrow kind, and they slow down locktime.
Wide triggers are all right for single-action shooting, giving the illusion of a lighter pull. A better way to attain lighter single-action pull is to make the proper adjustment on the rear and hammer notch, not relying on such crutches as the wide trigger, which is impossible in fast double-action shooting. Single-action trigger pull should register around 2½ pounds.
Every metal part of my new “lifetime” gun will be crafted from stainless steel, which resists rust and corrosion better than any blued or plated gunmetal.
For stocks, I’m going to indulge myself a little. Although there are more durable handles, I will leave practicality behind and trouser my sixgun in elephant tooth, perhaps with my old T cattle brand inlaid in gold.
My stainless-steel, 5-inch, Colt-S&W-Ruger-High Standard .357 may not be your dish, and if the saints are willing, you may never have to choose just one gun to serve you. But a little advance cogitating never spoiled a mulligan stew. Try your own recipe–you might brew up a prize winner.








This poor thing looks like it was rode hard and put away wet to me. Grumpy

Laying prone at the Crusader Range at the SAAM Shooting School on the FTW Ranch in Barksdale, Texas, I was presented with the challenge of making two consecutive shots: the first at 325 yards, and the second at 500 yards, with only 10 seconds between the two. Upon report of the first, the countdown began.
While the first was steep downhill to my left, the second was much flatter, but almost 90 degrees to my right. It would require setting up for the first shot, and making not only a scope adjustment to compensate for the difference in trajectory, but completely realign my shooting position to punch the steel plate.
All this to simulate a game animal moving at varying distances, and to teach the skills needed to make the shot—or sometimes to teach you what shots are beyond the shooter’s capability.

Having been to this facility several times, and being familiar with the ever-changing winds which flow through those canyons, I’ve found that a flat-shooting cartridge with a decent velocity and a high ballistic coefficient (BC) can make your life much easier. This particular day I was shooting the classic Remington Model 700 rifle, chambered for the brand-new Hornady 7mm PRC; this new design certainly got the job done.
Hornady has made waves with their 6.5 PRC (Precision Rifle Cartridge), which was based on the now-obscure .300 Ruger Compact Magnum, as well as the .300 PRC, based on the .375 Ruger; both parent cases were designed by Hornady in conjunction with Ruger.
While the .300 PRC has a maximum cartridge overall length of 3.700 inches and requires a magnum action for best performance, the 6.5 PRC has a 2.955-inch overall length and can fit in a short-action receiver, the new 7mm PRC sits right in the middle—clearly designed for the long-action receiver, and putting the cartridge smack in the middle of the previous two releases.

The 7mm PRC maintains the same 0.532-inch rim and base diameter as its older siblings; you cartridge hounds may recognize that number as the H&H Belted Magnum rim and belt diameter, but the PRC family and many other Hornady designs use that for the body diameter. Being a rimless design, the 7mm PRC will headspace off the shoulder, and it keeps the same 30-degree shoulder angle as its relatives. The 7mm PRC’s case length comes in at 2.280 inches, with a maximum cartridge overall length of 3.340 inches, the same as the .30-06 Springfield.
There are currently three loads available, but at the time of this writing, the only one I could get my mitts on for testing was the 180-grain ELD Match, cruising along at a muzzle velocity of 2975 fps. The also a 175-grain ELD-X Precision Hunter softpoint running at 3000 fps, and a 160-grain CX Outfitter at a muzzle velocity of 3000 fps.
Measuring the factory cartridges, I observed an average overall length of 3.2910 inches, which means there might be a bit of room to seat that long, sleek bullet out even further, but based upon the way it shot, I see no reason to do so. That long sleek bullet has a G1 BC value of 0.796, and the folks at FTW clocked it at 2955 fps—certainly in step with advertised velocities. And for starters, the 100-yard accuracy was certainly sub-MOA, with some groups running as tight as ½-MOA during our range sessions to zero the rifle.

As per the usual FTW routine, targets are engaged at all sorts of distances, from sane hunting scenarios to next-zip-code shots, and the 7mm PRC handled them all well. Our rifles were topped with Swarovski Z8i 3.5-28x50mm scopes, with the BRX-1 reticle; while larger in both magnification and objective lens size than I would normally choose on a hunting rifle, these were good choices for reaching out past 1,200 yards. While the scope’s elevation turret was marked in mils (with a series of raised yardage markers, which I felt were absolutely perfect for hunting), I will describe the trajectory in inches of drop, just to illustrate the point.
With a 200-yard zero, the 7mm PRC will rise 1.4 inches at the 100-yard mark, dropping 6 inches at 300 yards, 17.1 inches at 400 yards and 33.7 at 500 yards. Being completely honest, with a cartridge of this velocity and trajectory I’d prefer to use a 250-yard zero. Doing that will see a rise of 2.50 inches at 150 yards, but a 2-inch drop at 300 yards, and a 6-inch drop at 350, giving me a dead-hold on a deer’s heart to roughly 325 yards. If simplicity appeals to you, a trajectory like this will cover the vast majority of you hunting shots. With this zero, 400-yard shots will drop 13 inches, and 500-yard shots drop 27 inches.

While I personally have no business shooting at unwounded big game past 500 yards (a self-imposed limit, based on my real-world experiences), we did have fun stretching the 7mm PRC’s legs on steel targets, taking it all the way out to 1,500 yards confidently, and making several hits just past the one-mile mark. Bottom line? The 7mm PRC has the goods to make long range shots confidently, and as this is American Hunter, our concerns are targets much closer than that of the true long-range competition shooter.
Recoil? I found the 7mm PRC to be totally manageable, though some folks who don’t regularly shoot magnum cartridges proclaimed it to be a bit stiff. I have had some 7mm Remington Magnum rifles beat me up much, much worse than did the Model 700 in 7mm PRC, and putting 60 to 75 shots per day from the prone position didn’t crush my shoulder. In a hunting situation, where you’d spend a bit of time zeroing the rifle, and then firing a few shots at game, I can honestly say that you wouldn’t feel the recoil at all.

Does the hunting and shooting world need a 7mm PRC? Well, I think the answer to that question is yes. Yes, the .300 PRC offers heavier bullet weights, yet it requires a longer action and comes at the price of much stiffer recoil. The 6.5 PRC is a great cartridge, but with bullet weights south of 145 grains, I feel it is limited in the game species for which it is applicable.
A 175-grain lead-core hunting bullet, or perhaps a 160-grain monometal, will allow the 7mm PRC to join the “all-around” club, being able to take all North American game shy of the huge coastal grizzlies, and the majority of African species with the exception of the true heavyweights. All this in a beltless case which won’t have any of the stretching issues that the belted cases have, which offers great concentricity and excellent accuracy; I can’t see any reason not to choose the 7mm PRC.


This feature article, “Ruger: Hencho en Mexico,” appeared originally in the July 2005 issue of American Rifleman. To subscribe to the magazine, visit the NRA membership page and select American Rifleman as your member magazine.
Colonel Rex Applegate was born in Yoncalla, Oregon, in 1914. He graduated from the University of Oregon in 1939 with a degree in business administration. That same year he joined the U.S. Army as a second lieutenant in the Military Police Corps and eventually rose to the rank of colonel. Applegate had an interesting and colorful career in the service. He was the head close-combat trainer for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) during World War II and became the acknowledged expert in close combat, working on the design of combat knives with British Commandos. After returning to the States, Applegate was assigned to special duty at “Shangri La,” now known as Camp David, Md., to guard President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
After a distinguished military career, Col. Applegate retired from the regular Army with a combat disability in 1946. A residence with a dry, warm climate was recommended. While in the military Applegate became acquainted with an officer who had retired to Mexico. On his recommendation Applegate visited Mexico and decided the climate was right and commercial opportunities there looked promising. During this time the officer who recommended Mexico to Applegate had obtained a distributorship and opened an assembly plant for Nash Motors, in Mexico City, called “Nash Motors of Mexico.” Applegate was employed in 1947 as service manager.
The colonel’s interests did not lie in automobile production but in what he knew best: firearms, or at least a firearm-related business. During the war, Applegate became very well acquainted with the management at Smith & Wesson. It was through that acquaintance that he was able to break into the firearm business. Dave Murray, S&W sales manager, contacted Applegate in Mexico. The timing was perfect. Applegate was able to obtain 1,000 .22 S& W K22 revolvers. The new K22 Masterpiece, a replacement for that model, had been introduced in the States and Smith did not want these 1,000 revolvers on the U.S. market. Applegate marketed the guns in Mexico. The venture was highly profitable as the Mexican population was eager for any type of firearm.
Applegate resigned his position at Nash Motors to form his own company, Cia Compania Importada Mexicana (The Mexican Importing Company). Financing was furnished by Frank Sanborn, owner of the famous Sanborn Drug and Restaurant of Mexico City. Applegate operated in Mexico from 1948 to 1955 as factory representative for S&W, Remington, and Peters Ammunition, as well as a U.S. chemical company that produced a line of tear gas. He also served as representative for a number of U.S. fishing tackle firms, as well as other allied firms in the sporting goods industry.
Laws governing import duties in Mexico were changed in 1955. Prior to that time import duties were quite low. Afterward, not only were import duties raised, but products sold in Mexico were required to be 40 percent manufactured in Mexico. A manufacturing and assembly facility was needed, and Applegate established Armamex, S.A. The Armamex manufacturing and assembly plant was located in the city of Pachua, State of Hidalgo, approximately 90 miles north of Mexico City. He was president and in charge of sales and retained all U. S. contracts. Financing was furnished by W.O. Jenkins, a wealthy American residing in Puebla, Mexico. Eugene Everhert, an American gunsmith and long-time Pachua resident, was hired as plant manager.
Everhert was an engineer at a local silver mine until that time. P.O. Ackley was brought in for assistance in setting up the new plant and to perfect Armamex’s barrel making operation, and Ackley’s employment was on a temporary basis. Another American gunsmith, who also lived in Mexico, was in charge of assembly and quality control. Management was basically American, while the labor force was Mexican. Firearms assembled in the plant were stamped “armamex, mexico” and/or “hecho en mexico” (made in Mexico).

Sales were through Cia Compania Mexicana. Applegate’s companies served a network of approximately 200 Mexican arms dealers. Firearms consisted of a single-shot .22 rifle manufactured entirely in the Armamex factory and a single-barrel, Iver-Johnson shotgun. Stocks and barrels for the shotguns were produced by Armamex to comply with the local 40 percent manufacturing law. These economical hunting arms seemed to fill the needs of the local population, and shotguns and .22 rifles were not considered a security threat by Mexican military officials. The Mexican military was the source for licenses and permits, and revolutions aren’t usually fought with either type of arm.
With the successful marketing of these economical long guns Applegate decided to offer a line of better-quality sporting arms. He made a trip north to the United States to meet with manufacturers in order to fill this new firearm line. This was either late 1955 or early in 1956. He struck a deal with Bill Donavan of High Standard for several hundred .22 Sport King pistols. In a meeting with Robert L. Hillberg, owner of Whitney Firearms, Inc., of New Haven, Conn.,
Applegate made a deal for 200 .22 Whitney Wolverine pistols. In a letter from Mr. Hillberg, he (Hillberg) recalled how the transaction was accomplished, “Bob Dearden was our key man and the entire transaction was with him. Bob devised a method of identifying the individual component parts and packaged them in a manner Applegate could receive and assemble the original guns without mixing any of the parts. Rex shipped the parts to a company in Texas. How he got them into Mexico, I have no idea.”

Applegate’s close friend W.H.B. Smith, firearm expert and author, arranged for a meeting with William B. Ruger, Sr., of Sturm, Ruger & Co. Ruger and the colonel struck up an instant friendship. The two men shook hands and made an informal agreement. Applegate purchased 200 Standard Model Ruger .22 pistols, and they were shipped to the American Firearms Company at Brownsville, Texas, (a company Applegate had organized with U. S. licenses for purchasing and exporting firearms). A representative of Armamex was sent to Texas to receive the shipment and they were disassembled there. Parts were marked and bagged with caution not to mix the parts from one gun with another. The parts were imported to Mexico, but Applegate’s Mexican import permits covered parts only, not complete firearms. The High Standard and Whitney pistols were shipped in a similar manner. These transactions were an experiment and not repeated.
On arrival at Armamex the pistol parts were roll-marked, blued, and assembled. The Ruger pistols were serially numbered with the letter prefix “r.” Rolled on receiver’s right was “hecho en mexico,” and the left side was marked “ruger cal. 22 l.r. armamex mexico.” The Whitney and High Standard pistols were marked “armamex mexico.”
The finished pistols were then shipped from Armamex to Cia Compania Mexicana and on through the Mexican network. All the Ruger pistols were shipped except one that Applegate put back and later gave to Bill Ruger for his personal collection. Although successful, Applegate—realizing the position he and his companies could be placed in with the Mexican authorities—elected to discontinue the importing of either complete U.S. handguns or parts. His Mexican firearm operation was built around rimfire single-shot rifles and shotguns, and Applegate decided to return to that. His degree in business administration had served him well.
Armamex operations continued until 1962 when Applegate was recalled by the military for special duties in relation to riots in the United States, and he left Mexico in 1963.
Armamex continued to operate for several more years, but it eventually folded due to poor management—along with increasing government interference. The Mexican government ordered seizure of all firearms in the early 1970s. Sporting goods stores were forcibly closed, and inventories were confiscated.
Rules can be bent in Mexico if the right generals are approached, and money put in the proper pockets. Some of the Armamex pistols have found their way out of Mexico, but fewer than a dozen Armamex Ruger pistols are known in private collections—and even fewer High Standard and Whitneys have been located. All of Applegate’s records and photographs on the Armamex operation along with guns from his personal collection were confiscated.
Sadly, Rex Applegate died on July 14,1998, at the age of 84. One of this great man’s many legacies remains a handful of Ruger pistols that were “hecho en mexico.”







