
BELLEVUE, WA – Following Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy’s push for more gun control under the guise of declaring “gun violence” a “public health crisis,” the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms announced its support for the proposed Protecting the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Act, sponsored by U.S. Senator Mike Braun (R-IN).
Sen. Braun’s legislation is co-sponsored by Senators Thom Tillis, Kevin Cramer, Jim Risch, Mike Crapo, Cynthia Lummis, Joni Ernst, Cindy Hyde-Smith, John Hoeven, Steve Daines, Ted Budd, Roger Wicker, Rick Scott, Tom Cotton, Josh Hawley, John Thune, Mike Rounds, Joni Ernst, Markwayne Mullin, Ted Cruz, and JD Vance.
“Dr. Murthy’s declaration earlier this week was an outrage,” said CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb. “He has joined other Biden administration officials who have weaponized their positions and agencies against the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens. His contention that gun-related violent crime is a public health issue is nothing more than a scam to push Joe Biden’s extremist gun control agenda.
“In addition, we’re delighted that Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL) has announced she will work to strip power from the Department of Health and Human Services,” he continued, “and cut all funding for bureaucrats who are using their positions to erode our Constitutional rights.”
Gottlieb reiterated his earlier condemnation of Murthy’s declaration, noting, “Violent crime is not a disease, it’s a symptom of failed leadership, starting with Joe Biden and going all the way down through his administration.”
“From the moment Joe Biden stepped into the Oval office,” Gottlieb said, “he has used government officials and agencies to advance his gun ban agenda. The Surgeon General’s announcement this week is just the latest manifestation of this effort. Murthy even admitted this is the first time in history a Surgeon General has issued an advisory calling gun-related violence a public health issue, and it ought to be the last. Violent crime is a law enforcement issue, period. Dr. Murthy should stick to fighting flu bugs and stay away from firearms.”
Field Marshal Rommel was a formidable foe. Here’s what America learned from him.

Editor’s Note: For today’s #ThrowbackThursday, we’re examining the lessons the Allied powers learned in World War II from one of America’s most formidable enemies at the time.
Arguably the greatest general that Germany produced during WWII was Field Marshal Erwin Rommel (1891-1944), The Desert Fox. A career soldier, he fought during both World Wars, and became so revered for his tactical leadership skills and aggressive battlefield style that some Allied forces began to believe he was superhuman. To that point, the British Army Commander-in-Chief C.J. Auchinleck, issued the following order to his officers:
There exists a real danger that our friend Rommel is becoming a kind of magician or bogey-man to our troops, who are talking far too much about him. He is by no means a superman, although he is undoubtedly very energetic and able.
Even if he were a superman, it would still be highly undesirable that our men should credit him with supernatural powers. I wish you to dispel by all possible means the idea that Rommel represents something more than an ordinary German general.
The important thing now is to see that we do not always talk of Rommel when we mean the enemy in Libya. We must refer to “the Germans” or “the Axis powers” or “the enemy” and not always keep harping on Rommel. Please ensure that this order is put into immediate effect, and impress up all commanders that, from a psychological point of view, it is a matter of highest importance.
No, Rommel was not superhuman, but he did have what the Germans called (big-word warning) Fingerspitzengefuhl, an innate sixth sense of what the enemy was about to do. For instance, a German general, Fritz Bayerlein, Rommel’s Chief-of-Staff at the time, relates the following two anecdotes.
“We were at the headquarters of the Afrika Korps…when suddenly Rommel turned to me and said, ‘Bayerlein, I would advise you to get out of this [location]: I don’t like it.’ An hour later the headquarters were unexpectedly attacked and overrun.”
Bayerlein continues, “That same afternoon, we were standing together when he [Rommel] said, ‘Let’s move a couple of hundred yards to a flank, I think we are going to get shelled here.’ One bit of desert was just the same as another, but five minutes after we had moved, the shells were falling exactly where we had been standing. Everyone…who fought with Rommel in either war will tell you similar stories.”
Rommel also had the ability to quickly size up a battle in progress, and the decision-making skills to then seize the opportunity to attack when one presented itself. Consequently, he earned a reputation for, at times, making rash decisions, but those decisions seemed to pay off for him and his armies more times than not.
A trait that endeared Rommel to his vanguard troops was that he “led from the front,” spending nearly as much time with the frontline, everyday soldier as he did with his officers back at headquarters. As a result, his soldiers were willing to follow him anywhere.
Another characteristic that helped make Rommel the military legend he became was that he was constantly learning, not only from his victories, but also his defeats—especially his defeats, which seemed to haunt him. And he was open to new ideas, new equipment, new weapons, anything that would make his armies more efficient and in turn, more successful.
For example, Rommel did not invent blitzkrieg—a highly mobile style of warfare employing armored, motorized forces—but he and his 7th Panzer Division of tanks certainly perfected it in France during 1940. Later in the war, his Afrika Korps then continued using the technique in the deserts of North Africa to win battle after battle.
Rommel had always been a prolific writer, and following his time in Africa he authored a paper titled The Rules of Desert Warfare, the small portions below being just a few of the more interesting excerpts from the six-page document.
- The tank force is the backbone of the motorized army. Everything turns on the tanks, the other formations are mere ancillaries. War of attrition against the enemy tank units must, therefore, be carried on as far as possible by one’s own tank destruction units…[they] must deal the last blow.
- Results of reconnaissance must reach the commander in the shortest possible time, and he must then make immediate decisions and put them into effect as quickly as possible. Speed of reaction in Command decisions decides the battle. It is, therefore, essential that commanders of motorized forces should be as near as possible to their troops and in the closest signal communication with them.
- It is my experience that bold decisions give the best promise of success. One must differentiate between operational and tactical boldness and a military gamble. A bold operation is one which has no more than a chance of success but which, in case of failure, leaves one with sufficient forces in hand to be able to cope with any situation. A gamble, on the other hand, is an operation which can lead either to victory or to the destruction of one’s own forces. Any compromise is bad.
- One of the first lessons which I drew from my experiences of motorized warfare was that speed of operation and quick reaction of the Command were the decisive factors. The troops must be able to operate at the highest speed and in complete coordination. One must not be satisfied here with any normal average but must always endeavor to obtain the maximum performance, for the side which makes the greater effort is the faster, and the faster wins the battle. Officers and NCOs must, therefore, constantly train their troops with this in view.
- In my opinion, the duties of the Commander-in-Chief are not limited to his staff work. He must also take an interest in the details of Command and frequently busy himself in the front line.
- The Commander-in-Chief must have contact with his troops. He must be able to feel and think with them. The soldier must have confidence in him. In this connection there is one cardinal principle to remember: one must never simulate a feeling for the troops which in fact one does not have. The ordinary soldier has a surprisingly good nose for what is genuine and what is fake.
In the WWII movie Patton, released in 1970, actor George C. Scott portrays the brash and flamboyant American General George S. Patton. Near the end of the movie, after Patton and his army have defeated Rommel and his troops, Patton shouts loudly across the battlefield in victory, “Rommel, you magnificent b______, I read your book!”
The book he was referring to was Rommel’s Infanterie Greift An (Infantry Attacks). Published in 1937, it chronicles his experiences during World War I. If you’d care to read it, the treatise will give you a look into the mind of one of the greatest tactical military geniuses of the 20th Century. The Rommel Papers, edited by B. H. Liddell Hart and published in 1953, is also highly recommended, relating Rommel’s WWII experiences in his own words.



In the beginning there were those newly transferred in from the unwashed masses who for some reason — real or perceived — glimpsed the truth they might need to be responsible for their own well being. For some, this lesson was purchased at great price. They are the few lucky ones, lucky to have survived, but unlucky enough to have been roles players in a real life act of robbery, rape and even murder.
A student, a victim of an attempted kidnapping comes to mind, he recalled, “I shot him with my two-shot derringer and he just looked at me.” He now carries a 1911 with no prompting from me.
From another student: “He broke into my house and raped me in front of my children and it will never happen again… ever.” This female, a true warrior now, shoots a large-frame magnum revolver. And she shoots it very well.
Student three advised, “I came to school because two guys kidnapped my wife and murdered her.” Continuing, he said, “I need to be able to protect myself and my two kids now that I have to raise them by myself.”
For the novice all of this mayhem can seem somewhat overpowering. What gun should I have, what kind of ammunition should I carry? It can be truly mind-boggling.
Looking At Your Life
Review the “who, what, where and when” so to speak of your life. Break your daily life down into where you work, play and move about. By doing so you may be able to develop a plan for your training agenda. If your life revolves around kids, then dismount drills from vehicles — making sure the munchkins do not sling the vehicle doors open into oncoming traffic — is a good thought.
Too complicated you say? I just talked to a woman who carried one child inside and one outside her person while living in Rhodesia. Her driving accessories were an FN-FAL rifle on the front seat of the car and a glove box full of hand grenades. She managed to raise two good kids and is even now a grandmother. And rather an elegant one I might add.
Who you are and what you do will help you to decide how you should train.
Training
You can get formal training and it can be beneficial. Just make sure what you are getting is what you think you need. If you aren’t sure, ask questions from those you’re about to take training from. Just because somebody was in the Army or a cop for 20 years doesn’t necessarily mean you want to drop your personal protection anchor on his or her theoretical expertise.
I just had a guy sit in my house and tell me marksmanship wasn’t as important as tactics. Could be, but if you can’t hit anything when you shoot you won’t need tactical skills. If you buzz a 9mm through the head of your kid being held hostage at the end of your hallway it will probably ruin your day and Junior’s too.
Guns And Gear
If you don’t own a handgun, don’t know anything about them and are truly interested in personal defense, a solid, simple choice is a Glock. I prefer the mid-size Model 19 or 23 in 9mm or .40 caliber respectively. I would avoid vent holes in the barrel. All the latest models come with the built-in light rail so if you want to add a light to your pistol and training, the rail makes it easy.
Buy a good flashlight and consider whether or not a gun-mounted light serves any purpose for you. Buy only high quality lights and consider rechargeable types that may be kept readily available inside the home or vehicle. Streamlight, Inc. is a brand I have used successfully for both hand held and gun-mounted systems.
Blue Light Special
I had two different guns blow up on our ranges in March of 2004 because of people using reloaded and cheap, foreign made ammo. Economy is nice, but some things should not be scrimped on. Should I go on?
Buy good ammunition, Black Hills, Corbon, Federal, Remington or Winchester as examples. You can buy ball for practice and something exotic if you think you need it for personal defense. Buy, test, carry, shoot and use only good ammunition! And as always, while practicing, wear good eye and ear protection.
The Bottom Line
For those interested, a good handgun runs about $570 with night sights. The flashlights (hand-held and gun-mounted) run from $100 to $250 based on features such as recharge capability. A case of 1,000 rounds of 9mm ball is still affordable. So for around a minimal investment you can get good equipment and good ammunition to start your skills development.
Will you be one of the lucky ones? I don’t know, but I believe the harder you train the luckier you will get — and I would rather be good than lucky.