Disclaimer—It was a metaphorical slap.
After independence, Nehru appointed General Lockhart, British army personnel, as the chief of the Indian Army.
After a year, when the credibility of Gen. Lockhart was questioned, he resigned.
So, Nehru called a meeting along with the top security personnel and the leadership of the country.
He again wanted to appoint some British personnel as chief of the Indian army.
He said—
Since Gen. Lockhart is has resigned, we need to point a new army chief. And I think it is better to appoint a British man because we don’t have a capable and experienced Army man in our country.
His statement hurt the army people who were there. Of course, it would because there were many capable army officers sitting.
Then a brave, bold man stood up and said—
“We also don’t have a man enough experience to lead our nation. Shouldn’t we appoint someone from Britain as our prime minister?”
So, yeah, it was a tight, metaphoric slap for insulting the Indian Army Officers.
The man was Thakur Nathu Singh Rathore
He served as Division Commander in Burma during World War II, and he was a key person in India-Pakistan 1947 war.
In 1947, he was offered the position of Commander-in-chief of the Indian Army.
He declined the position saying—General K. M. Cariappa is my senior and more eligible than me; He should be the chief.
In 1951, he was appointed as the commander of the Eastern Army.
The Donner Party was a group of American pioneers who became trapped in the Sierra Nevada mountains during the winter of 1846–1847. The group’s journey to California was delayed by mishaps, including a fateful decision to take an ill-advised shortcut called the Hastings Cutoff.
Stranded by heavy snow, members of the party faced starvation and were forced to resort to cannibalism to survive. With about 40 of the 87 travelers eventually dying from starvation, illness, and exposure.
Categories
The M1919A1 Browning machine gun
Categories
Astra A60
Categories
A very tempting idea!
Categories
Ukraine: Rifle Periscopes Return
New York isn’t moving toward constitutional carry, but the demand for firearms in New York City is exploding.Gun shops and instructors are slammed with residents trying to navigate the state’s maze of requirements just to exercise a basic constitutional right.
What many first-time buyers are discovering is that they can’t simply walk into a store, buy a gun, and walk out. Not that day. Not that week. Sometimes not even that year. The delays and layers of red tape are by design. New York’s political class has spent decades building a system that frustrates lawful citizens into giving up.
Fear Is Driving the Surge
After the Supreme Court struck down New York’s restrictive “may issue” carry scheme in Bruen, interest skyrocketed. But the rush started earlier. Crime spiked during the pandemic. Riots and looting hit the city. Police budgets were cut. Cashless bail kept violent offenders on the street. Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg’s policies turned the revolving door even faster. Add a wave of officer retirements, and many residents decided they were on their own.
Then came October 7, 2023. The Hamas attacks on Israel, paired with a rise in antisemitic crime at home, pushed many Jewish New Yorkers to start the permit process immediately. The election of avowed anti-gun, anti-police mayor Zorhan Mamdani sent another shockwave through the city. Police retirements spiked again.
Before Bruen, fewer than 100 New Yorkers per month applied for a carry permit. After Bruen, the monthly average climbed to 400–600. After October 7, applications hit an all-time record of more than 1,270 in a single month. Since then, 700–800 residents are applying monthly.
The New Gun Owner Is No Longer Who New York Politicians Pretend
The last several years have reshaped America’s gun-owning population. New York reflects that shift. New applicants include Jewish residents, Black and Hispanic residents, Asian Americans, and members of the LGBT community. The Second Amendment is for everyone, and people who never imagined owning a gun now see the value of self-reliance.
But the process is still a gauntlet. New York’s permit and purchase rules can drag out for a year or more. Mandatory courses are inconsistent and unstandardized, despite their length and cost. Buying a gun in the city is nothing like the experience in most of the country.
Instructors and Retailers Are Seeing a Full-Scale Awakening
Longtime firearms instructor Lance Dashefsky says the surge is tied directly to city leadership. “We ain’t fleeing. We’re here to stay. We’re not victims anymore,” he told the New York Post.
Brooklyn gun shop owner Michael Bergida sees the same concerns. “The NYPD is all retiring – we have to fight for ourselves,” he said.
Instructor Ross Den reports that even rabbis are preparing to carry. Synagogues are frequent targets, and congregations are no longer willing to depend on outside help that may not arrive in time. “People are beginning to wake up and realize they have to defend themselves,” Den said.
The Industry Stands With New Yorkers Who Want to Take Responsibility for Their Own Protection
Despite the hoops residents must jump through, gun shops across the city continue helping first-time buyers understand the process and get the training they need.
Anyone “gun curious” will find an industry ready to answer questions and help them navigate the system built to slow them down.
“We are Jewish and we will protect ourselves,” one woman told the Post. “We will have a say in our protection and not have to rely on others.”
That mindset is becoming more common across New York City. The right to keep and bear arms belongs to every law-abiding American, and more New Yorkers are deciding they’re done letting the city decide for them.