Categories
All About Guns

I Have This Old Gun: French Model 1935A by GARRY JAMES

At the beginning of the Great War in 1914, France’s primary handgun was the cunning 8 mm double-action Modèle 1892 revolver, also known as the “Lebel” or “St. Étienne.” As well-made as it was, the gun’s main problem was there just weren’t enough of them.

This sent authorities scurrying in an attempt to supplement meager stores of ’92s with just about anything they could find. As well as bringing old French 11 mm Model 1873s back into service, a hodgepodge of semi-automatic pistols and revolvers was accumulated from other sources, primarily Spain and the United States.

After the war ended, the French government, wishing to update its armament and to standardize things, in the 1920s authorized a series of trials testing several arms from a variety of applicants. Curiously, ordnance types became enamored of the American .30 Pedersen cartridge and decided a similar cartridge would be just the ticket for France’s new semi-automatic pistol. After some fits and starts, a list of guidelines was issued for a new set of cartridges beginning in 1933.

The ideal repeater would be single-action, chamber the Pedersen 7.65×20 mm Longue round, have a firing mechanism that could be removed in its entirety for cleaning and servicing, employ a firing pin-block manual safety, and permit simple fieldstripping accomplished by removing the slide stop. It also needed an easily removable inertial firing pin, magazine safety and tapered chamber. Weight was expected to be 1 lb., 7 ozs., or 1 lb., 8 ozs.

Two guns ended up in the final 1935-’37 competition, one submitted by Société Alsacienne de Constructions Mécaniques (SACM), a company heretofore specializing in heavy machinery, and the well-known arms-building entity Manufacture d’Armes de Saint-Étienne (MAS).

Helming the project at SACM was Charles Petter, a Swiss engineer who, in a busy early life had, among other endeavors, served as an officer in the French Foreign Legion. His pistol was a handy, well-thought-out, eight-shot, short-recoil design employing a Browning-style dual-swinging link arrangement that, when the gun was fired, tugged the barrel downward, unlocking it from the slide. It incorporated a captive recoil spring, external hammer and safety lever, which, when rotated upward, rolled a block between the striker and hammer, preventing the latter from contacting the former when the trigger was pulled.

Measuring 7.7″ overall with a loaded weight of 1 lb., 13 ozs., it was svelte, comfortable in the hand and simple in operation and construction. The pistol tested favorably and was accepted as the Pistolet automatique modèle 1935A, the “A” in the semi-automatic’s designation referring to “Alsacienne.” Concurrently, the gun submitted by MAS (which though looking much like the 1935A was not interchangeable) was also adopted as the Pistolet automatique modèle 1935S, “S” standing for “Saint-Étienne.”

Production of the M1935A began in October 1937. The pistol was finished with a sturdy baked-enamel finish and fitted with finely checkered Bakelite stocks. Manufacture continued apace, and arms were issued to French forces. With the fall of France in 1940, the M1935A was turned to use by the German conquerors and Vichy forces as the Pistole 625 (f). Those guns made under German occupation, as well as falling within a certain serial number range, will be found with either a “WaA 655” (early) or “WaA 251” Waffenamt code.

After World War II, M1935As continued to be built until 1950, by which time some 874,000 had been made. Though not as widely seen on the collector market as some other foreign guns of their period, enough M1935As (and M1935Ss) show up to keep prices reasonable. The German-era M1935A seen here is in good, original condition with most of its original finish and is worth $700.

Gun: Pistolet automatique modèle 1935A
Manufacturer: Société Alsacienne de Constructions Mécaniques (SACM)
Chambering: 7.65 Longue
Manufactured: 1942
Condition: NRA Very Good (Modern Gun Standards)
Value: $700

Categories
All About Guns

M777 155mm Howitzer: The Ultimate Artillery Weapon

Categories
All About Guns

Back in the day, you could do a whole lot worse than this team!

Categories
N.S.F.W.

Today is Impersonate Authority Day NSFW

Categories
All About Guns

A Springfield Model 951 Shotgun in 410ga

Categories
Uncategorized

10 BEST Full Size Handsguns In 2024!

Categories
All About Guns

A Remington 700BDL with a 3-9x40mm scope in caliber .30-06 Springfield

My Wonderful Grandmother Alice gave me one of these a VERY long time ago. Of which I very stupiditly traded for a divorce. ( I should of sold another gun instead. But then I am an idiot) Anyways, this rifle was in ’06 and kicked like a mule. Especially since it had NO recoil pad to speak of.

So learn from my mistakes! In that one should be very careful of who or what you marry. Also that one should NEVER sell a classic rifle unless your back is to the wall. That & a good recoil pad is a solid investment! Grumpy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

Khyber Pass Martini Pistol

Categories
Some Scary thoughts War

Thoughts on Ukraine’s drone strike against Russia’s strategic bombers by Bayou Renaissance Man

We haven’t seen any independent reports about Ukraine’s drone strike yesterday morning against Russia’s strategic bomber force (Tupolev Tu-95‘s, Tu-22‘s and Tu-160‘s).  Ukraine claims that 40 or more of these aircraft were hit by its drones;  if so, that would mean that up to a third of them have been damaged or destroyed.  (Since the factories that produced these aircraft, and components for them, have mostly been shut down or drastically reduced in capacity, a severely damaged aircraft will take so long to repair and restore that it might as well be written off as destroyed anyway.)

My first thought is that this attack is not a surprise.  Anyone studying military history and current military technology could have (and in many cases did) predict such a strike against Russian assets.  The only surprise to me is that it’s taken so long to do it.  I thought it would come within the first couple of years of the war.

Second, this should be an extremely urgent wake-up call to the West.  Drone flights over our air bases have been publicly reported for years;  I’ll be very surprised indeed if some, if not most of them were operated by potential enemies such as China, Russia, Iran and others.  Some may also have been operated by terrorist groups or drug cartels looking for potential high-profile targets.  A strike similar to Ukraine’s could be launched against the USA at any time by almost anyone, because there will be no difficulty getting drones and their explosive payloads into this country and right up to the boundaries of the air bases concerned.  Our internal security measures are laughably poor (and I speak as one who had extensive experience of anti-terrorism measures in another country for the best part of two decades).  I hope Defense Secretary Hegseth and his top brass are alert to that possibility, and I hope they’re doing something very concrete about it – because if they’re not, we could lose half our Air Force overnight.  I mean that literally.  The same could happen to any or all NATO country(ies).

My third thought is that this might escalate the Russia-Ukraine war to a new level of viciousness.  Russia’s strategic bomber force, one of the “nuclear triad” legs that safeguard its independence and national pride, has suffered a severe blow.  That might be enough to make already paranoid Russian politicians and military leaders even more so.  How might they retaliate?  There are a number of ways, up to and including tactical nuclear weapons.  Will they go that far?  Who knows?  I suspect we may be about to find out.

Fourth, where did the containers holding those drones come from?  I don’t think they were all smuggled clandestinely across an active war zone to penetrate Russia.  I suspect at least some of them were shipped into Russia through third parties, perhaps as outwardly innocent-seeming commercial containers containing normal goods and products.  Can that have been done without the involvement of the intelligence and/or customs officials in those third party nations?  Possibly . . . but I’d be more inclined to believe that a certain degree of officially blind eyes were involved.  If Russia can determine the ingress routes of those containers, it may be able to use its own extensive intelligence resources to find out whether official tolerance was given to their passage.  If so, I won’t be at all surprised if Russia does something nasty to discourage those nations from further meddling.  What might that be?  Who can say?

Finally, this highlights how parlous is the international security situation at present.  From Ukraine’s point of view, this strike was a no-brainer.  Ukraine’s already losing on the battlefield, slowly but steadily.  A big propaganda success like this, causing severe damage to its enemy, can only look positive from the loser’s perspective.  However, for the nations supporting Ukraine, it’s a lot more difficult and dangerous.  If it leads to Russian retaliation against, not just Ukraine, but every nation that supports it, that may drag the entire region into the war whether they like it or not.  The almost suicidal fixation of some nations to support Ukraine no matter what is another aspect of this problem (for example, Germany’s recent removal of restrictions on its weapon exports to Ukraine, allowing the latter to use them to attack anywhere in Russian territory).  In physics, Newton’s Third Law of Motion assures us that “to every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”.  In war, the reaction is equally guaranteed, but not that it’ll be equal.  It can be a lot more than equal, to make a point.  If Russia hits out at any and every nation it believes might have been involved with or supported the Ukraine drone strike, that may drag the whole of NATO into the war – and right now, NATO is in no condition to sustain a conflict of that nature for any length of time.

So . . . a propaganda and military success for Ukraine, but producing a much more volatile and dangerous situation for the wider region.  Was that a win, overall?  We’ll find out . . .

Peter

Categories
Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom Gear & Stuff

The Brutal Weapons of the Vikings – Historical Curiosities