A little TLC & this would be a real sight to see on the firing line or in the field!
Edward W. Stack is chief executive of Dick’s Sporting Goods.
Throughout history, the United States has been a beacon of hope for the world — especially for people who appreciate and respect that we are a country founded on laws that have been enacted to guard our freedom and keep us safe.
As a gun owner, I support the Second Amendment and understand why, for many, the right to bear arms is as American as baseball and apple pie. But I also agree with what Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in his majority opinion in 2008’s landmark Heller case: “Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.” It is “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”
It is clear we have a problem with the gun laws in this country. They are not squarely focused on keeping all of us safe — especially our children.
There continue to be mass shootings — at our schools, churches and entertainment venues. Following each of these senseless, tragic events there’s a great deal of idle, fruitless talk in the halls of Congress, and then the conversation quickly comes to an end.
It’s our great hope and belief that this time will be different. It has to be different.
Maybe it’s because the survivors of the Parkland, Fla., massacre — and the thousands of students who made their feelings known for 17 minutes last week — are standing up and shouting “enough is enough” and “never again.” They are demanding that our elected officials come together to find solutions. These brave young men and women are not going away.
In the weeks since we at Dick’s Sporting Goods announced plans to stop selling assault-style rifles, plans to only sell firearms to those over 21 and other new policies, we have been striving to keep this conversation going. We have met with a number of lawmakers and have talked with many of our peers in the retail industry. We have spoken with strong-willed advocacy groups and visited with families in Parkland.
It is becoming increasingly apparent through our conversations that there continues to be deep skepticism that anything of substance will be done.
Some members of Congress are committed to change, but not enough are willing to set aside partisanship to find a solution. I continue to call on lawmakers in both parties to talk with each other with the expressed intent to act.
What’s also surprising is how many citizens and leaders in our government are not aware of the loopholes and inconsistences in our firearms laws.
Here are some to think about:
●You can’t buy a handgun until you’re 21, but you can buy an assault-style rifle at 18.
●You can buy a gun on the Internet from someone in your state without a background check, but a background check is required to buy a gun on the Internet from someone in a different state.
●Few states provide a list of those in their state who are banned from buying a gun to other states.
●A person deemed too dangerous to fly on a commercial plane is nonetheless legally permitted to purchase a gun.
We understand this is a complex issue and Congress has a number of constituencies with broad agendas. But we hope Congress will take notice of not only what students are saying but also what the private sector is telling it. Two of the three largest firearms retailers in the country have publicly said we are implementing our own policies for the sale of firearms.
This issue transcends our company’s bottom line. We suspected that speaking out would have a negative impact on our business. But this was about our values and standing up for what we think is right.
After we announced our new firearms policy, we were gratified that Walmart, Kroger, L.L. Bean and REI showed courage and leadership by announcing their own new policies. We hope others in the private and public sectors join us in this effort.
A group of us in corporate America have taken a stand, made hard choices and enacted reforms on our own because we firmly believe it’s the right thing to do for our kids and for our country.
The kids in Florida and across the nation have taken a stand and been brave enough to make their voices heard.
The majority of Americans are demanding that members of Congress take a stand and be brave enough to do their jobs.
Well Edward, you’ve thrown a number of red herrings around in your arguments. For one thing, we and you know that the whole internet purchasing issue is ridiculous, since it’s just another means of communicating other than calling them on your cell phone, meeting someone in a parking lot, meeting them at a gun show, work, home or on the side of the road, and selling them one of your guns. In common parlance, it’s called a “person to person transfer.” It’s legal as it should be, but you already know that. I’m just pointing out that we aren’t fooled by your corporate communications department.
What you’re really telling us is that you oppose the right and liberty of person to person transfers, or in other words, you favor universal background checks, which not only runs contrary to the second amendment, but wouldn’t have done anything about the event you claim to be the catalyst for your positions.
Next up, the issue of the no-fly list galls me because what you’re really saying is that you favor leaving men and women in the country who are dangerous enough to warrant that kind of scrutiny, but opposed to deportation. In other words, you’re just using them as an excuse for more gun control like the rest of the progressives. You don’t want the country to be safer by deporting them – you’re just setting them up as a prop for more statist control over common, ordinary, peaceable men and women.
And you also know all about the wonderful lives saved as a result of having those AR-15s available to them. Since you know all about this, what you’re really saying by your self-imposed ban of AR-15 sales is that you don’t want anyone to have what they might consider to be the best weapon available for defense of home and hearth. You’re a cruel elitist and you don’t really care about others.
I could go on, but I’m just writing these things down to show you how badly your corporate communications department sucks and how badly they botched this commentary. They really didn’t do a good job on this one, but of course, they are writing talking points rather than really knowing what they’re talking about.
So here’s the scoop for me and Dick’s Sporting Goods. I had begun to visit less frequently, and most of the time if I was there with a family member I walked over to the firearms section only to notice that no one was manning the counter (if anyone wanted to buy anything an employee had to be paged), the ammunition was fairly run of the mill and not really all that cheap, you had a few shotguns, a few bolt action rifles and not much else, your gun cleaning supplies pretty much sucked, and it was in general a depressing place to be. Everyone else there seemed to shake their head and walk away too.
Dick’s Sporting Goods is like the little child who doesn’t know what he wants to be when he grows up. You don’t know what you want, except to make some money. But you’ve let your progressive viewpoints get in the way of that, Edward.
So this is all going to be decided for you by the consumers. You’re basically going to become nothing but a store for women’s clothing and pansy-ass golf gear. But here’s the thing: women can find their clothing anywhere, and you won’t survive as a golf shop.
The only product I have bought recently at Dicks, some outdoor shoes, I will now buy at Bass Pro Shop or Cabela’s. Yes, I’ll avoid REI as much as I can as well. Going to Bass Pro Shop or Cabela’s will be just a little extra drive for me, but it’ll be worth it to watch Dick’s spin down the drain.
Congratulations. You just consigned your company to doom.
What you’re really telling us is that you oppose the right and liberty of person to person transfers, or in other words, you favor universal background checks, which not only runs contrary to the second amendment, but wouldn’t have done anything about the event you claim to be the catalyst for your positions.
Next up, the issue of the no-fly list galls me because what you’re really saying is that you favor leaving men and women in the country who are dangerous enough to warrant that kind of scrutiny, but opposed to deportation. In other words, you’re just using them as an excuse for more gun control like the rest of the progressives. You don’t want the country to be safer by deporting them – you’re just setting them up as a prop for more statist control over common, ordinary, peaceable men and women.
And you also know all about the wonderful lives saved as a result of having those AR-15s available to them. Since you know all about this, what you’re really saying by your self-imposed ban of AR-15 sales is that you don’t want anyone to have what they might consider to be the best weapon available for defense of home and hearth. You’re a cruel elitist and you don’t really care about others.
I could go on, but I’m just writing these things down to show you how badly your corporate communications department sucks and how badly they botched this commentary. They really didn’t do a good job on this one, but of course, they are writing talking points rather than really knowing what they’re talking about.
So here’s the scoop for me and Dick’s Sporting Goods. I had begun to visit less frequently, and most of the time if I was there with a family member I walked over to the firearms section only to notice that no one was manning the counter (if anyone wanted to buy anything an employee had to be paged), the ammunition was fairly run of the mill and not really all that cheap, you had a few shotguns, a few bolt action rifles and not much else, your gun cleaning supplies pretty much sucked, and it was in general a depressing place to be. Everyone else there seemed to shake their head and walk away too.
Dick’s Sporting Goods is like the little child who doesn’t know what he wants to be when he grows up. You don’t know what you want, except to make some money. But you’ve let your progressive viewpoints get in the way of that, Edward.
So this is all going to be decided for you by the consumers. You’re basically going to become nothing but a store for women’s clothing and pansy-ass golf gear. But here’s the thing: women can find their clothing anywhere, and you won’t survive as a golf shop.
The only product I have bought recently at Dicks, some outdoor shoes, I will now buy at Bass Pro Shop or Cabela’s. Yes, I’ll avoid REI as much as I can as well. Going to Bass Pro Shop or Cabela’s will be just a little extra drive for me, but it’ll be worth it to watch Dick’s spin down the drain.
Congratulations. You just consigned your company to doom.
If you let it. This 22 caliber rifle can teach just about anybody a lot about precision shooting!
Good article – thanks!
I may have a line on an Enfield. I’ll think I’ll pursue it…
Reply
Weetabix,
For someone who wants to keep the rifle in as close to original condition as possible, the Enfield represents the best way to go. Given your priorities, I think you ought to get that Enfield.
Just don’t forget to put the parts from the rear sight into their own ziplock baggie and LABEL IT, lest the pieces get sucked into the vortex of unidentifiable little metal doo-dads that junk drawers get filled with. I’ve learned that lesson the hard way.
Reply
I received the photos via email yesterday and inquired about the price. It’a a No 4, Mk 1. Bent bolt handle and all.
I haven’t done too well with the baggie thing to date. I haven’t changed out many parts, yet, on things, so it’s not too late, but I’d better get started!
Reply
There are a lot of Mausers that already have a bent bolt (model 98, M48, etc). Also you forgot to mention the ATI scope rail integrated stock that you can use with most fully bent bolt Mausers. You can find them as low as $70. The scope mounts high enough that the safety clears. So rifle plus the stock plus scope and rings.
I would think the Enfield would be a good choice for value but go with a Mauser if you want to put some money into it later down the line to rechamber or spruce up. It will retain more value than the Nagant.
There is a reason why most modern hunting rifles follow the Mauser action. Heck the USA plagiarized the design of the Mauser to create the 1903 Springfield rifle!
You may have a hard time finding a Nagant that will achieve 2 MOA. If you decide to go that route, you can get a cut, drill and tap bolt handle and a do it yourself drill and tap scope mount for the Nagant which are about $50 for both.
Reply
I concur You are a collector like myself,who shoots,You want a Enfield #4 MKI or II This is the rifle that has been there.More than likely the proofs will be real and the numbers matching.You may have to work on the stock,and the bore may need a little tlc,but this rifle will perform for you
Reply
Great review and great help. Thanks to you.
Reply
I’ve never owned a Mosin Nagant but I’ve owned the Enfield and a few Mauser sporters. I agree with everything said about the Enfields, which is one of two centerfire rifles I decided that I couldn’t part with when I downsized my collection.
I will say this though, for consistant accuracy I think the Mauser 96 cant be beat. They’ve got the same complications as the 98 in regards to scope mounting, but I’ve never seen one in half decent shape that wasn’t a tack driver.