Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

Florida Baby, You will never forget your 1st time there!

Having been there a few times. I can safely say that this State is just as wild & crazy as California. Maybe even slightly more!
Enjoy
GrumpyImage result for crazy florida memes


Image result for crazy florida memes

Image result for crazy florida news
Image result for crazy florida news Image result for crazy florida memes

Categories
All About Guns

RPA QUADLOCK .300 WIN MAG

Image result for RPA QUADLOCK .300 WIN MAG
Image result for RPA QUADLOCK .300 WIN MAG
Image result for RPA QUADLOCK .300 WIN MAG
Image result for RPA QUADLOCK .300 WIN MAG
 

Categories
All About Guns

Who Doesn't Like a Judge?

Categories
Cops

Congress Stands With the Blue, Against the Constitution The lopsided House vote for treating assaults on cops as federal crimes is a bipartisan portrait in cowardice. Jacob Sullum | May 23, 2018

Jacob Sullum | May 23, 2018
Last week the House of Representatives, by a margin of more than 10 to 1, approved a completely gratuitous, blatantly unconstitutional bill that would make assaulting a police officer a federal crime. The lopsided vote was a bipartisan portrait in cowardice that vividly showed how readily politicians forsake their oaths of office to keep their hold on power.
The Protect and Serve Act prescribes a prison sentence of up to 10 years for anyone who “knowingly assaults a law enforcement officer,” thereby “causing serious bodily injury,” or “attempts to do so.” Such conduct is, of course, already illegal in all 50 states, and there is no reason to think local law enforcement agencies are reluctant to arrest and prosecute people guilty of it.
Nor does the problem addressed by the bill seem to be on the rise, notwithstanding all the overheated talk of a “war on cops.” The number of law enforcement officers who are feloniously killed each year is small and volatile, but according to the FBI it dropped by 30 percent last year, and the average for the last 15 years (51) is lower than the average for the previous 15 (65).

In any event, the Constitution does not give Congress the authority to fight local crime, and the interstate angles mentioned by the bill are so oblique that they could justify federal prosecution of pretty much any assault (or attempted assault) on a cop. If the alleged assailant drove on an interstate highway or used a weapon produced in another state, for instance, that would be enough to make a federal case out of it.
“A tenuous connection to economic activity cannot transform a criminal law that has nothing to do with economic activity—and that is explicitly for the purpose of public safety—into a regulation of interstate commerce,” the House Liberty Caucus noted before the vote. “If it could, the Commerce Clause would destroy the Constitution’s design for a very limited federal role in criminal law enforcement, covering only a few crimes that are clearly federal in nature.”
The Protect and Serve Act explicitly allows federal prosecution of someone who is acquitted in state court, or who is convicted but receives a penalty the Justice Department deems too light. According to the Supreme Court’s “dual sovereignty” doctrine, such serial prosecutions do not violate the Fifth Amendment’s ban on double jeopardy, but they clearly offend the principle of fairness embodied in that rule.
These issues should be familiar to anyone who has followed the debate over federal prosecution of hate crimes, which occur when the victim is picked “because of” his “actual or perceived” membership in a protected group. The Senate version of the Protect and Serve Act takes that analogy and runs with it, targeting assaults and attempted assaults committed “because of the actual or perceived status of the [victim] as a law enforcement officer.”
Under that bill, someone who takes a swing at a guy he mistakenly thinks is a cop has committed a federal felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison—even if he misses. This approach, which takes a page from the “Blue Lives Matter” laws that at least four states have adopted in recent years, effectively punishes people not just for their conduct but for their anti-cop attitudes, just as hate crime statutes effectively punish people for their bigoted beliefs.
In addition to these problems, the possibility of federal felony charges based on garden-variety tussles between cops and people they detain, on top of state charges for assault and resisting arrest, gives police more leeway to abuse their powers. The Protect and Serve Act would protect and serve cops who hassle innocent people or use excessive force, giving them a new legal threat to use against their victims.
With 35 brave exceptions, these objections did not faze the House, where “Defend the Constitution” was no match for “Stand With the Blue.”
Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason magazine and a nationally syndicated columnist.
Categories
All About Guns Allies Darwin would of approved of this! Gun Info for Rookies

Some possible Good news for Ohio!

Ohio Self Defense Reform Bill Passes House Committee

Ohio Self Defense Reform Bill passes House Committee
Ohio Self Defense Reform Bill passes House Committee

Arizona -(Ammoland.com)- Ohio bill HB 228 has passed out of the House Federalism and Interstate Relations Committe on a seven to three vote. The vote was along party lines, with seven Republicans voting for the bill and the three Democrats voting against the bill.
The Ohio legislature is looking to reform Ohio law on self-defense. Currently, Ohio appears to be the only state where the burden of proof in a self-defense case rests with the defender. When a person claims self-defense in Ohio, the defender has to prove that they acted in self-defense. In nearly every other state, the burden of proof is on the prosecution. They have to prove that the defender did *not* act in self defense. From the nraila.org:

HB 228 would place the burden of disproving a self-defense claim onto the prosecution, similar to how it is in almost every other state. Further, House Bill 228 would expand the locations that a person has no duty to retreat from before using force to defend themselves under both civil and criminal law.

Arizona flirted with this reversal of the traditional burden of proof for a decade. Prosecutors lobbied the legislature and reversed the ordinary burden of proof in 1996. It is much easier for prosecutors to obtain a conviction when the burden of proof is shifted to the defendant.
Harold Fish paid the price for the prosecutor’s power grab.
Harold Fish killed a man who was charging at him and yelling that he was going to kill him. The first investigator on the scene reported it was such an open and shut case, he classified it as self defense and did not arrest Harold. The county prosecutor did not like that assessment, so they replaced the first investigator and arrested Harold Fish.
After much public outcry, involving three separate bills passed by the Arizona legislature to change the law, a long appeals process, two vetoes by Democrat Governor Janet Napolitano (a former prosecutor), $700,000 dollars spent on legal defenses, and three years in prison for Harold Fish, the trial court was found to be in error, and Fish was freed. He died three years later.
It is this type of abuse within the legal system that HB 228 is meant to prevent.
Prosecutors in our society have enormous power. They can lie. They can recruit false witnesses. They can have obvious conflicts of interest. They can repeatedly bring prosecutions against people who have committed not crime, for personal reasons. The Supreme Court has ruled that they can not be sued for any of this. They have absolute immunity.
Prosecutors have incredible levels of power. Shifting the burden of proof in self defense cases away from the defendant is a small step in placing limits on that power.
Jim Irvine of Buckeye Firearms says that Ohio is the only state in the United States that has this burden of proof placed on the defender. From buckeyefirearms.com:

“Ohio is the ONLY state in the U.S. with this absurd requirement for burden of proof,” said Jim Irvine, Chairman of Buckeye Firearms Association. “It has been talked about in legal seminars around the country for years. It is an embarrassment to Ohio.
“People under attack should be able to defend their life. They should not have legal hurdles to jump before acting to defend themselves. They should not be second-guessed for years over a decision they were forced to make in a second. Ohio law should protect the victim, not the aggressor. This bill corrects this problem with Ohio law.”

HB 228 has 34 sponsors in the House, and one in the Senate. The Ohio House (the legislative assembly) has 99 members, of which 66 are Republicans. The Ohio Senate has 33 members, of which 24 are Republicans.
The Ohio governor is Republican John Richard Kasich, Jr.
Governor Kasich has been making noises about supporting various restrictions on gun ownership. Those restrictions include outlawing private sales, allowing police to confiscate guns on the basis of basis of “gun violence protection orders” without any due process, and others.  It is unknown if Governor Kasich would sign this self defense reform bill.
©2018 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch


About Dean Weingarten:Dean Weingarten
Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of constitutional carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering, and recently retired from the Department of Defense after a 30 year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

 
 
 

Categories
Gun Info for Rookies

Some more good stuff from hickok45

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Why am I NOt surprised by this?

Ron Paul: Republicans, Democrats Teaming Up for Federal Gun Confiscation Bill

A source inside the US Senate has reported that Republicans and Democrats are teaming up and using the recent tragedy in Texas as the impetus to push through a massive federal gun control bill.

gun
In an email Tuesday night, former Congressman and presidential candidate Ron Paul released an ominous statement claiming that a source they have in the Senate revealed Democrats are teaming up with Republicans to push through a massive gun control bill.

According to their source, as Paul explained, “Senators Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) are teaming up with Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) to ram through one of the worst nationwide gun confiscation schemes ever devised.”

The gun confiscation bill, according to Paul, is designed to disarm Americans without any due process. The senators are using the recent tragic shooting in Texas as the impetus behind the law—in spite of the fact that this law would not have prevented the shooting at all.
As the Free Thought Project has previously reported, some states have already begun implementing laws like this one. Using mass shootings as a their ammunition, states have enacted “Red Flag” or “Risk Protection” laws which allow police to confiscate a person’s weapon before they are ever given a chance to defend themselves.
In both of the gun confiscation cases reported by TFTP, neither of the two men were suspected of committing a crime, nor had they committed a crime.
Under the fifth and fourteenth amendments, due process clauses are in place to act as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the government outside the sanction of law. What’s more, neither of the men were granted their sixth amendment rights to be confronted with the witnesses against them. In both cases, simple orders—under new laws—were issued, arguably arbitrarily, which stripped these two men of their property.
In spite of what officials and the media claim, when a person is stripped of their constitutional rights, albeit temporarily, without being given the chance to make their own case based on what can be entirely arbitrary accusations, this is the removal of due process.
As Ron Paul explains, this removal of due process could soon be a federal law.

Under so-called “Red Flag” or “Risk Protection” Orders, anti-gun family members, neighbors, or associates could have your guns taken away based on mere accusations without any real due process or trial.
In secret court proceedings, where only your accuser is present, judges could determine that you pose a “significant danger” to someone, including yourself.
Imagine your surprise when a heavily armed SWAT Team arrives to seize your lawfully owned firearms.
It would then cost you tens of thousands of dollars in court costs and weeks or even months to try and convince the court they made a mistake.

To be clear, no one here is advocating for people determined to be mentally unfit to be able to possess firearms. However, they need to be determined to be mentally unfit before they lose their rights.

To those who may be in favor of such laws, consider the following: There is no way to stop an estranged spouse from calling police repeatedly and telling them their ex is threatening to cause harm to others. While the man in Florida had his guns taken for being psychologically unfit, the man in Seattle simply open-carried a pistol and looked out of windows and his guns were taken because his neighbors thought it was strange.
Anyone, any time, now has the ability to claim someone else is a threat and have police take their guns. One does not need to delve into the multiple ‘what if’ scenarios to see what sort of ominous implications arise from such a practice. What’s more, police in some states now have the power to deem you a threat at any time and legally disarm you—due process be damned.
This is the exact scenario that Donald Trump advocated for in February.

NBC News

@NBCNews

WATCH: President Trump: “I like taking the guns early … Take the guns first, go through due process second.”

As Ron Paul explains, this is entirely unconstitutional.

The words of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution are so easy to grasp:
“. . . the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
There were no asterisks and no footnotes. There are no sentences that follow which start with the words “unless” or “however.” The right to defend your life and property shall not be infringed by the government.
Period.

Paul’s Campaign for Liberty has set up the Defend the Second Amendment Directive where citizens can sign a petition to demand their Senator not pass this blow to freedom and self-defense. You can sign it here.
Please share this article to let your friends and family that saying, “they are coming for our guns,” is not a conspiracy theory.

Categories
All About Guns

Orbea Hermanos Spanish Copy Of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4" SA/DA Double Action Revolver in 38 Special

Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4
Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4
Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4
Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4
Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4
Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4
Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4
Orbea Hermanos - Spanish Copy of Smith & Wesson Hand Ejector, Chrome 4 1/4

 

 In the early 20th century, foreign firearms manufacturers, particularly in Spain, looked to capitalize on the success of Smith & Wesson and Colt revolvers in the United States. Centered on the town of Eibar, a cottage industry sprung up with dozens of small manufacturers turning out imitations which ranged from having a passing resemblance to some which were near direct copies.
 This is one such revolver made by Orbea Hermanos, closer to a direct copy than many, with its side plate, 5-screw frame and even with a monogram logo which is strikingly similar to Smith & Wesson’s.
  It was for this reason that Smith & Wesson began marking their products with their Marcas Registradas address, to let customers know that it was the genuine article. Orbea Hermanos was considered one of the better manufacturers in Eibar, having made revolvers for export to the United States, England, France and Italy, some even being carried by soldiers.
Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Well I thought it was funny!

Poor Max, Folks are always picking on her!

Categories
All About Guns

Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” in 32-40

Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 7
Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 8




Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 4
Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 5













Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 10
Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 9
Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 6
Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 3
Winchester Model 94 “Duke One of One Thousand” Commemorative, Large Loop, Blue/Antique Gold 18 ¼” - Lever Action S.R.C, Box & Wood Case, MFD 1981 C&R - Picture 2
 
John Wayne was a legend, and loved and respected around the world as the symbol of America at is very best.
In more than 150 films, he captured the essence, strength, values and sense of purpose of a Western Hero.
In 1979, he became one of the few Americans ever to be awarded a Congressional Gold Medal for service to the nation. This rifle is a beautiful tribute to John Wayne,