Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Lockdown Under (Poor OZ!)

September 02, 2021

Lockdown Under

“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it,” George Santayana famously wrote. Apart from a few garbled anecdotes about Captain Cook and Ned Kelly, and something about Aborigines, Australians are, by and large, quite ignorant of their history. Is it any wonder that we’re repeating it?

Many Americans will have seen the shocking images from last weekend in Melbourne. Tear gas, pepper spray, heavily armored police chanting like soccer hooligans and firing rubber bullets. “The world’s most livable city” suddenly looks more like Belfast in the 1990s.

This sort of brutal state power has never been seen in Melbourne before. Not even when hundreds of African migrants fought pitched battles in the Melbourne CBD during the annual Moomba festival, the city’s premier family event, in 2016. When tens of thousands of BLM protesters swarmed in defiance of lockdowns last year, none were arrested or even fined. Instead, police joined in the ritualistic abasement of “taking the knee.”

“After 230 years, Australia has reverted to being an island prison.”

But the brutality of premier “Dictator Dan” Andrews, the Australian equivalent of a governor in Melbourne’s state of Victoria, is only the tip of the medically induced dictatorship that has seized Australia in the wake of the Wuhan pandemic.

Like Soviet citizens, Australians are prevented from even leaving their country. After 230 years, Australia has reverted to being an island prison.

The key to understanding what’s going on in Australia lies in our history. When Australia became a nation in 1901, the seven former colonies were determined, as states, to still cling to as many of their powers and privileges as they could. So, states retained the right to run hospitals and schools, for example. Emergency management also remained a state’s right.

That means that, under a pandemic, the states suddenly have tremendous power, wielded through public health bureaucracy and under “state of emergency” declarations. The federal government in Canberra has been rendered mostly helpless. In fact, thanks to state border closures, Prime Minister Scott Morrison is a virtual prisoner in Canberra, forbidden to travel anywhere else in the country he is supposed to be running.

The states have also effectively wrested the running of the national economy from the Commonwealth. When premiers like Daniel Andrews have shut down their entire states for weeks on end, they have demanded that the Commonwealth bail them out with emergency welfare payments. Facing an election next year, the Morrison government has not dared say no.

So Australia is racking up tens of billions of national debt, solely to protect state premiers from the economic consequences of their authoritarian policies.

Victoria, Melbourne’s state, is far and away Australia’s COVID capital. 1980s Australian rock band Little Heroes might have sung that Melbourne Just Isn’t New York, but “Dictator Dan” is Australia’s Andrew Cuomo.

Despite the harshest restrictions in Australia (Melbournians have spent 200 of the past 500-odd days under lockdown, with no end currently in sight), Victoria has easily the worst record of Covid deaths: five times as many Covid deaths as the rest of Australia combined.

All courtesy of Andrews’ staggering, inept hotel quarantine scheme.

In a grim echo of Cuomo’s aged-care cock-up, the Andrews government made a series of shocking blunders with hotel quarantine. The security contract was granted to a technically insolvent firm, solely because it was an “indigenous enterprise.” Security guards were hired via WhatsApp. None of them were given training in infection control or wearing protective gear, but they were required to undergo “diversity and inclusion” training. Quarantine staff took their meal breaks in a nearby KFC. Medical waste was stored in open bins in a public car park.

“Dictator Dan” has steadfastly refused to accept any responsibility. Instead, his government has ground the bootheel ever harder on the state’s citizens.

The violence in Melbourne last weekend was just the culmination of months of increasing authoritarianism. The city has been placed under curfew—twice—for the first time in its history. Even during the darkest days of WWII, Melbournians were freer than they are now.

Andrews has vastly increased state power under a “state of emergency” that was promised to run for four weeks. It’s now been in place for over a year, with no end in sight. The only sunset clause in Victoria is that the premier has declared it out-of-bounds to sit on the beach to watch the sunset.

Police in Victoria may now detain any person or group for as long as “reasonably necessary,” restrict the movement of any person in the state, close any premises, and “require the destruction or disposal of anything.” Police can enter homes and seize property without a warrant.

Police and army patrol the Murray River—the border between Victoria and New South Wales—like Stasi watching over the Berlin Wall. Drones buzz in the Melbourne skies, and snitches diligently scan social media for WrongThink.

So it was that pregnant Zoe Buhler found herself being handcuffed in her pajamas, in her own home, in front of her children, for posting on Facebook. Journalist Avi Yemini was visited at home by police, warning him to stay away from covering protests. When he ignored them, he was crash-tackled by a squad of riot police. His cameraman and security guard have both been arrested.

But Victoria is far from unique. In West Australia, Premier Mark McGowan has sealed off the state for most of the past year. McGowan has also passed “emergency” legislation exempting himself from criminal law and civil liabilities. His decisions and actions cannot be appealed. The premier can also now make laws without reference to parliament, in direct contravention of Australia’s Westminster tradition of government.

Just to make it completely clear, McGowan has also ruled that individuals or organizations whose views “do not represent the views of the West Australian government” are barred from state-owned venues.

If Americans are astounded by what they’re seeing from Australia, many of us here never thought it could happen here, either. After all, our national anthem tells us “we are young and free.”

We were wrong.

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

The True Distance of a Typical Gunfight

Categories
All About Guns

A Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS in 12 GA

Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 2
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 3
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 4
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 5
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 6
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 7
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 8
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 9
Lefever NITRO SPECIAL SIDE BY SIDE SHOTGUN 30 INCH BARRELS WOOD STOCK DOUBLE TRIGGERS NICE 12 GA - Picture 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Good News for a change!

What I think that a Fighter Jet should look like – The F-86

Categories
All About Guns

I wonder what caliber it is?

Categories
All About Guns

A Winchester Model 1894 Pre-64 .30 W. C. F Dated 1908

Winchester Model 1894 Pre-64 .30 W. C. F Dated 1908 Superb Scoped Rifle + 1908 Tang Peep Rear Sight Marble Exc Bore .30-30 Winchester - Picture 2
Winchester Model 1894 Pre-64 .30 W. C. F Dated 1908 Superb Scoped Rifle + 1908 Tang Peep Rear Sight Marble Exc Bore .30-30 Winchester - Picture 3
Winchester Model 1894 Pre-64 .30 W. C. F Dated 1908 Superb Scoped Rifle + 1908 Tang Peep Rear Sight Marble Exc Bore .30-30 Winchester - Picture 4
Winchester Model 1894 Pre-64 .30 W. C. F Dated 1908 Superb Scoped Rifle + 1908 Tang Peep Rear Sight Marble Exc Bore .30-30 Winchester - Picture 5
Winchester Model 1894 Pre-64 .30 W. C. F Dated 1908 Superb Scoped Rifle + 1908 Tang Peep Rear Sight Marble Exc Bore .30-30 Winchester - Picture 7

 

 

 

 

 

Categories
Grumpy's hall of Shame

Boom time for Afghan arms dealers in Taliban heartland

Weapons dealers in Panjwai, Kandahar province, are flush with inventory after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan
Weapons dealers in Panjwai, Kandahar province, are flush with inventory after the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan JAVED TANVEER AFP
Panjwai (Afghanistan) (AFP)

The Taliban takeover may have plunged Afghanistan into uncertainty and economic pain, but arms dealer Khan Mohammad is making the most of it.

Sandwiched between a pharmacy and a general store, his shop in the Panjwai district of southern Kandahar province — the spiritual birthplace of the Taliban — is flush with fresh inventory.

Camouflage combat vests and bandoliers hung from the walls as Mohammed showed off his wares, including US-made Smith & Wesson pistols and ammunition belts.

More pistols, grenades, walkie-talkies and jars full of bullets lined the glass display in the front.

Pistols, ammunition belts and accessories are on sale in the Panjwai market
Pistols, ammunition belts and accessories are on sale in the Panjwai market JAVED TANVEER AFP

The end of the conflict has led many weapon-owners to conclude they no longer need them, Mohammad explained.

“People who have had guns at home for years bring us their weapons,” he said.

Mohammad has a customer lined up too.

“We buy them and sell… to the Mujahideen,” he said, referring to the Taliban.

“The Taliban don’t let anyone else take (the weapons).”

Mohammad did not just have weapons — there were accessories too.

The Panjwai arms dealers also have Taliban flags and accessories for sale
The Panjwai arms dealers also have Taliban flags and accessories for sale JAVED TANVEER AFP

White Taliban baseball caps with the Muslim proclamation of faith printed on them hung from the ceiling. The group’s flags were also on sale.

Another dealer in the dusty Panjwai market, whose shop was adorned with large Taliban flags and pictures of the group’s top leaders, had more potent offerings.

They included assault rifles — variants of the AK-47 as well as the US-made M4 and M16 — and even light machine guns.

The Taliban for years procured weapons and ammunition from the black market. They also captured arms and equipment from the battlefield and abandoned military posts, according to UN and Western monitors.

Pistols, hand grenades and ammunition are seen on display at a shop in Panjwai, Kandahar
Pistols, hand grenades and ammunition are seen on display at a shop in Panjwai, Kandahar JAVED TANVEER AFP

And the recent collapse of the Afghan military created an arms bonanza for the militants.

Alongside a large haul of American-made infantry weapons, Afghanistan’s new rulers now possess equipment and vehicles — including humvees, armoured personnel carriers, and at least one functioning Black Hawk helicopter.

The militants are also making the most of their spoils.

One arms dealer told AFP that the Taliban purchase their stock, and do not let others buy weapons
One arms dealer told AFP that the Taliban purchase their stock, and do not let others buy weapons JAVED TANVEER AFP

The Taliban are cashing in on a wide variety of items from abandoned Afghan and Western military bases.

They seized Panjwai district in July as the withdrawal of US-led troops from Afghanistan gathered pace.

In the local market, everything from construction material to metal trays salvaged from the district’s Afghan military base was for sale.

“We bought all these things from the Taliban after they conquered the Afghan army base,” said vendor Murtaza, who gave only one name.

“Now we bring them to the market to sell.”

Categories
All About Guns

A Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver in caliber .38 Special

Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 2
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 3
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 4
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 5
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 6
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 7
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 8
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 9
Smith & Wesson Md-14 6 in. Bbl K 38 Revolver .38 Special - Picture 10
Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic!

Billions’ Worth of Equipment Left Behind, While Feds Purge Records on Afghanistan, Affirm Commitment to Gun Control

Billions’ Worth of Equipment Left Behind, While Feds Purge Records on Afghanistan, Affirm Commitment to Gun Control

As the Taliban celebrates the withdrawal of U.S. forces by parading their American-sourced tactical vehicles, aircraft, guns and other weapons, reports have emerged that the Biden Administration has ordered federal agencies to delete online information respecting the cost of this military equipment and related spending in Afghanistan, while proclaiming its support for more gun control.

Forbes article states that by August 23, at least “two key reports on the U.S. war chest of military gear in Afghanistan … had disappeared from federal websites,” including a Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit of U.S.- funded equipment for Afghan National Defense and Security Forces (GAO-17-667R, Aug. 2017).

A week later, Forbes reported that the U.S. State Department admitted the documents had been removed and had instructed other federal agencies to “review their web properties” for similar content and “remove [it] from public view.” The reason given was the need to ensure the “safety of our Afghan contacts” by deleting information that poses “a security risk.” A GAO spokesperson contacted by Forbes confirmed that “the State Department requested we temporarily remove and review reports on Afghanistan to protect recipients of US assistance that may be identified through our reports and thus subject to retribution.”

In the circumstances, this is a less than convincing justification. The deleted GAO Report, for one, lacks any personally identifiable information about members of the Afghan defense and security forces or other partners. Moreover (as pointed out in the Forbes article), the Biden Administration itself would have directly jeopardized such individuals already, when government officials allegedly provided the Taliban with the names of Afghan allies during the evacuation of Kabul.

A group of U.S. Senators is now demanding that the administration provide a full accounting regarding the U.S. military equipment left behind “as a result of our poorly executed withdrawal from the country,” questioning why such assets weren’t adequately secured prior to announcing the withdrawal from Afghanistan.

A cynic may be excused for believing that the Biden Administration is acting out of concern about the political blowback once the details of the unprecedented extent of state-of-the-art weaponry, paid for by American taxpayers and currently in the hands of the brutal Taliban, become more widely known.

One early casualty of Biden’s fast and furious exit from Afghanistan is the complete loss of credibility on gun control the President and his administration have as a result.

For decades, Joe Biden has pushed for strict gun control, hectoring Americans about the evils of guns in general and “assault weapons” in particular, yet a conservative estimate indicates that the weaponry left behind includes well over half a million rifles, handguns, shotguns and machine guns, together with an undisclosed amount of ammunition (the GAO report did not account for small arms ammunition and other ammunition was included with the billions spent in general “sustainment” expenditures). As NRA-ILA noted earlier, Biden’s “bungling of [the withdrawal] ensured that not just firearms but some of America’s more sophisticated military technology is now available to terrorists and other enemies who are and will continue to use them against Americans, American interests, and American allies.”

Even more jarringly, NRA witnessed – just a day after the August 30 pullout – a State Department official speak at the Seventh Conference of States Parties to the Arms Trade Treaty (“Promoting responsibility in international transfers of conventional arms”) to “underscore the continuing commitment” of the administration “to responsible international trade in conventional arms” and affirm its steadfast support for “strong and effective national controls on the international transfer of conventional arms.”

By now, Americans don’t believe in Biden’s policies or buy into his gun control agenda. A poll released at the beginning of this month shows that only 15% of U.S. voters polled “strongly approve” of President Biden’s handling of “gun policy,” compared to 35% who “strongly disapprove,” and over 60% thought the country had “gotten off on the wrong track.”

Categories
A Victory!

Some Good news for a change of pace

Yes I hate Cats! Grumpy Then there is this bit!