Categories
Other Stuff Some Scary thoughts

Things to Look For…

Things that seem disconnected but aren’t.  The thirteen bullet points below are the issues we will first notice as the general food supply chain begins show signs of vulnerability.  This outline explains why it is happening and how long it can be expected.

In the previous October, November and December warnings we emphasized preparation and counted down the 90-day window.  Now, as we enter the final two weeks before mid/late January, the date of our original prediction, it appears that some media are starting to catch up and the larger public is starting to notice.   [NOTE: We nailed the timeline almost to the week]

Feel free to note in the comments section what is happening in your area.  Hopefully, most of us are much better positioned than the average person who has not been following this as closely over the past several months.

Initial food instability signs in the supply chain.  Things to look for: 

(1) A shortage of processed potatoes (frozen specifically).

And/Or a shortage of the ancillary products that are derivates of, or normally include, potatoes.

(2) A larger than usual footprint of turkey in the supermarket (last line of protein).

(3) A noticeable increase in the price of citrus products.

(4) A sparse distribution of foodstuffs that rely on flavorings.

(5) The absence of non-seasonal products.

(6) Little to no price difference on the organic comparable (diff supply chain)

(7) Unusual country of origin for fresh product type.

 

(8) Absence of large container products

(9) Shortage of any ordinary but specific grain derivative item (ex. wheat crackers)

(10) Big brand shortage.

(11) Shortage of wet pet foods

(12) Shortage of complex blended products with multiple ingredients (soups etc)

(13) A consistent shortage of milk products and/or ancillaries.

These notes above are all precursors that show significant stress in the supply chain.  Once these issues are consistently visible, we are going to descend into food instability very quickly, sector by sector, category by category.

At first, each retail operation will show varying degrees of the supply chain stress according to their size, purchasing power, and/or private manufacturing, transportation and distribution capacity.

♦ BACKGROUND – Do you remember, the dairy farmers in 2020 dumping their milk because the commercial side of milk demand (schools, restaurants, bag milk purchasers) was forcibly locked down?   Plastic jugs were in short supply, and the processing side of the equation has a limited amount of operational capacity.

Potato farmers and fresh food suppliers were also told to dump, blade or plough-over their crops due to lack of commercial side demand.  These issues have longer term consequences than many would understand.  These are fresh crops, replenishment crops, which require time before harvest and production.

The retail consumer supply chain for manufactured and processed food products includes bulk storage to compensate for seasonality. As Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue noted in 2020, “There are over 800 commercial and public warehouses in the continental 48 states that store frozen products.”

Here is a snapshot of the food we had in storage at the end of February 2020: over 302 million pounds of frozen butter; 1.36 billion pounds of frozen cheese; 925 million pounds of frozen chicken; over 1 billion pounds of frozen fruit; nearly 2.04 billion pounds of frozen vegetables; 491 million pounds of frozen beef; and nearly 662 million pounds of frozen pork.

This bulk food storage is how the total U.S. consumer food supply ensures consistent availability even with weather impacts.  As a nation, we essentially stay one harvest ahead of demand by storing it and smoothing out any peak/valley shortfalls. There are a total of 175,642 commercial facilities involved in this supply chain across the country

The stored food supply is the originating resource for food manufacturers who process the ingredients into a variety of branded food products and distribute to your local supermarket. That bulk stored food, and the subsequent supply chain, is entirely separate from the fresh food supply chain used by restaurants, hotels, cafeterias etc.

Look carefully at the graphic.  See the fork in the supply chain that separates “food at home (40%)” from “food away from home (60%)”?

Food ‘outside the home’ includes restaurants, fast food locales, schools, corporate cafeterias, university lunchrooms, manufacturing cafeterias, hotels, food trucks, park and amusement food sellers and many more. Many of those venues are not thought about when people evaluate the overall U.S. food delivery system; however, this network was approximately 60 percent of all food consumption on a daily basis.

The ‘food away from home‘ sector has its own supply chain. Very few restaurants and venues (cited above) purchase food products from retail grocery outlets. As a result of the coronavirus mitigation effort, the ‘food away from home’ sector was reduced by 75% of daily food delivery operations. However, people still needed to eat. That meant retail food outlets, grocers, saw sales increases of 25 to 50 percent, depending on the area.

Covid regulations destroyed this complex supply chain in 2020.  It takes time to recover because the replenishment is based on harvest cycles.  This stuff must be grown.

When the food at home sector was forced to take on the majority of food delivery, they immediately hit processing constraints.  The processing side of the supply chain to funnel food into suppliers for the grocery store has “x” amount of capacity.  That system cannot (not feasible) and did not expand to meet the 20 to 50% increase in demand.

Think about potatoes.  A potato farmer sells into one of the two paths “food at home” (retail stores, or a processing supplier) or “food away from home” (commercial food or commercial food processors).   Other than bulk raw potatoes, the harvest goes into: (1) processing or (2) storage.

(1a) processing for retail sales (40%), ex. Ore Ida frozen potatoes, canning, or any of the other thousand retail products that use potatoes, whole or mashed.

(1b) processing for commercial sales (60%), ex. McDonalds french fries, or any of the thousand restaurant, lunchroom and cafeteria needs that use potatoes, whole or mashed.

♦ Processing – When 1b was shut down in 2020, 1a quickly reached maximum retail processing capacity.  Massive multi-million machines and food processing systems have a capacity. The supplies they use also have a capacity: plastic bags, cardboard, trays, bowls, etc.  The 1a processing system can only generate “X” amount of retail product at maximum capacity.

The remaining 1b commercial product was shut down.  A massive percentage of 1b (commercial) potatoes have nowhere to go, except waste.

♦ Storage – Each processor in 1a stores product (deep cold or frozen storage) for 365-day processing and distribution.   Those storage facilities have a limited amount of capacity.   The 1b customers need fresh product for the majority of their outlets. Ergo storing for 1b customers who might eventually be allowed to open later only works for a short period of time.  The fresh potato sales missed by 1b outlets = the 1b discard by potato farmers.

When you restart 1b suddenly the 1b short-term (fresh) storage product is quickly depleted.  Refilling that 2020 storage is dependent on a new 2021 harvest, which simultaneously has a greater immediate demand because the supply chain on the processing side was boxcar’d (over capacity) and then reset to a higher capacity playing catchup.

The amount missing from 2021 storage, because it was used instead of saved, is essentially equal to the amount that was wasted in 2020.

Now you end 2021 will less reserves because storage is depleted, because a greater percentage of the current harvest was immediately used.  You enter into the beginning of 2022 (winter) in a race to try and spread out the stored potatoes as you cross your fingers and race against the clock for the next harvest before running out.

You probably noticed – but attached to this issue is yet another motive to keep people (employees) away from large industrial cafeterias and even students from school lunchrooms.   The total food supply chain needs time, and harvests, to catch up.

In the example above you can replace *potato* with just about any row crop or retail/commercial food commodity like milk.

The reason I list the shortage of potatoes as the #1 precursor is because every food outlet sells a potato in some form.  Every supermarket and every single restaurant (fancy, sit down or fast food) sells some form of potato.   Potatoes are demanded by every single food outlet; therefore, a shortage of potatoes is the first noticeable issue.

The 2020 demand disruption problem now becomes a 2021/2022 supply chain problem on both the fresh and processing side (depleted inventories), with each vector now competing for the same raw material: wheat, soybeans, grains, beans and stored row crops.

Making matters worse, the protein suppliers also need grain as feed for cattle, pigs, cows, chickens, etc.

[Note: who gets the short straw? The pet food manufacturers]

That’s the nub of the background supply chain issue in the food sector.   Additionally, recovery is not a single-issue problem.

The recovery price and shortages relate to everything from current oil and gas prices to diesel engine oil prices, to fertilizer and weed killer costs, to plastic costs and petroleum packing shortages (Styrofoam especially), to cardboard and sustainable packaging costs, to energy costs and transportation/delivery costs.   All along this complex supply chain there’s also workers and higher payroll costs.

Thus, we get the double-edged sword of higher prices (inflation) and simultaneous shortages.

Here’s what you can do to offset grocery store shortages (while possible):

(1) Buy the generic or store brand equivalent (sub-set inside retail supply chain)

(2) Purchase the organic version (another sub-set inside retail supply chain)

(3) Purchase the powered/dehydrated version (potatoes, milk, etc) and experiment (jazz it up).

Each retail operation, or chain of stores, will show varying degrees of the supply chain stress according to their size, purchasing power, and/or private manufacturing, transportation and distribution capacity.

This is where field to fork supplier relationships can make a big difference.  However, every outlet regardless of their operational excellence, is going to have significant shortages in their inventory.   It’s an unavoidable outcome of the previous chaos.

On average the retail shortages will last for about as long as one full harvest schedule (4 to 6 months) depending on the commodity.   By September of 2022 the various sector should be relatively recovered.

However, government intervention could make the issues worse, or the recovery time take longer, depending on how they respond when people get seriously stressed in a few weeks.  The densely populated urban areas are going to be making a lot of noise and demanding the government fix the crisis.

Final note on INFLATION – The short-term prices will go up again, another 10, 20 up to 50% should be expected depending on the item.  Those prices will eventually level off, but it’s doubtful they will be able to come back down until supply and demand find some equilibrium again, if ever.  Right now, predicting future retail prices is too far off to even fathom.

I hope this outline provides you with information to help you make decisions for your family.

Categories
Manly Stuff This great Nation & Its People

Something that I like to hear on Gray Days like this one

Categories
All About Guns

Another someday I will get one of these Guns

Categories
Allies

What a Real American looks like

Categories
All About Guns

A couple of Non California M1As with some great looking wood on them!

Categories
All About Guns

A Llama Mod IXA in 9mm

Categories
All About Guns Allies

“Presentism”, Whiskey, Clips, & Museums: A Chat With Ashley Hlebinsky

Categories
Art

Wait until the end

Categories
All About Guns Ammo

Tested: Big Horn Armory Model 89 Carbine by AMERICAN RIFLEMAN STAFF

horn.jpg

The lever-action rifle stands tall within America’s gun culture. Much of this esteem stems from the days of westward expansion, when the lever-action repeater was the gun of choice. Even long after the frontiers were conquered, the appeal of the slim, tube-magazine repeaters from Marlin and Winchester remained strong.

Of all the various models of that late-19th-century era, none are better remembered than the Winchesters, whose origins can be traced back to the fertile imagination of John Browning. While the later Models 94 and 95 were highly regarded for their marriage of smokeless powder and traditional operation, the earlier Winchester lever guns were appreciated for their smooth operation.

Browning’s first Winchester repeater was the 1886, built for the longer blackpowder cartridges of the day, and six years later he scaled and shortened the Model 86 to produce the Model 92 for short blackpowder cartridges. Both guns were successful in their day and have been replicated in modern times.

In those days, the variety of cartridges available was not as broad as it is now. At present, we have an amazing array of cartridges, a few of which are intended for revolvers. Some are powerful enough to require special long-cylinder wheelguns—such as the .500 and .460 S&W magnums. Both of those cartridges are rimmed and would be right at home in a lever-action rifle. And while the Browning-designed Winchester Models 86 and 92 would seem to be interesting mates for such cartridges, their actions are not of appropriate length, the slick little 92 being too short and the 86 being too long.

Enter a completely new version of a timeless design, made by a new firm in Cody, Wyo., Big Horn Armory, and called the Model 89—which denotes the mathematical difference between 86 and 92. The BHA 89’s action is intermediate in size, although it retains all the same contours, manner of operation and locking system of its predecessors. Big Horn Armory makes the gun in its Wyoming plant using modern CNC-machining techniques.

There are no cast or forged parts in the gun, and, except for the black walnut buttstock and fore-end, BHA rifles and carbine components are cut from stainless steel bar stock. The test sample, an 89 Carbine, was finished in the company’s Hunter Black, appropriately matte and non-reflective for hard use afield.

An open-top design, the Model 89 has a bolt that reciprocates on rails machined into the inner walls of the receiver.

In addition to the physical resemblance of the BHA 89 to the Winchester 86 and 92, the operating system is also essentially the same. This is a manually operated rifle that cycles by the shooter’s operation of a lever that also serves as the trigger guard. An open-top design that ejects fired cartridges straight up, the BHA 89 has a bolt that reciprocates on rails machined into the inner walls of the receiver.

When the action is closed, locking blocks at both sides of the receiver engage mortise cuts in the bolt as well as matching recesses in the receiver walls. In this system, the blocks serve to lock the bolt firmly in place against the rearward thrust of a fired cartridge. When the shooter strokes the lever downward and forward, the first bit of motion pulls those blocks downward and out of contact with the bolt.

Further movement of the lever retracts the bolt to the rear to extract the fired case from the chamber and eject it out the top of the gun. At this point, a fresh round feeds rearward from the tube magazine under the barrel and onto the cartridge carrier. When the shooter strokes the lever back and up, the carrier moves the cartridge up into the path of the bolt.

When the bolt closes, the round feeds into the chamber and the locking blocks slide into place. The BHA rendering of this classic design seemed initially a bit stiff, but smoothed out with firing and handling—which is exactly how original 86s and 92s behaved.

Our test gun was an 18″-barreled carbine with a pistol grip buttstock and a full magazine tube. There are no traditional carbine barrel bands, which never did anything worthwhile for the accuracy of the original carbines anyway. Instead, the magazine tube is attached to the underside of the barrel by means of a dovetailed lug.


In essence, the gun is a marriage of traditional rifle and carbine features. Since it is a modern sporting firearm, there are several points on the gun that reflect a respect for the traditional, but not at the expense of practicality. The sights, for example, combine a front unit of modern green fiber-optic material on a ramped post with a rear comprised of a large aperture on a period-correct angled ramp, and both are shaped to resist snags on kit or brush. An optional forward rail for the mounting of a scout scope is also available. Traditional stock design would not well serve a little brush buster like this, so the stock is a bit thicker in the butt and fuller in the fore-end. Checkering on the sample was well-executed 20 l.p.i., and there is a thick Pachmayr recoil pad to help with the .500 S&W Mag.’s substantial recoil.

The BHA 89 is intended for taking large animals at close range. The .500 S&W Mag. is a rimmed revolver cartridge powerful enough that many shooters could not tolerate it in the revolvers for which it was designed, but it adapts well to this longer and heavier firearm. Available in several options, all made of stainless steel, the BHA 89 Carbine has an offspring in the BHA 90. It’s the same gun in Smith & Wesson’s other long magnum cartridge, the .460 S&W Mag.

Everywhere you look on BHA’s products, you see strong, heavy, well-made and carefully fitted components. Big Horn Armory may be a relatively new gunmaker, but it builds for rough use—with an obvious respect for tradition.

Categories
All About Guns

A Sako Finnwolf 308 Winchester VL63 Made 1975 Vintage Lever