Categories
All About Guns Allies

The Real Wonder-Nines by KIM DU TOIT

Way too much fluff has been written about the silly 9mm Europellet (a.k.a. 9mm Luger), the most egregious being its appellation as the “Wonder-Nine” [eyecross] , the only “wonder” being how people can believe all that crap.

So today I’m going to look at the two real wonder-nine cartridges that came out of Europe, i.e. the 9.3x47R and the 9.3x62mm, both well over a hundred years old and both the only serious contenders to the equally-venerable .375 H&H Magnum (blessings be upon it).

 

Both cartridges have a bullet diameter of .366″ with a typical weight of 285/286gr, and despite the different casing lengths, they are to all intents and purposes ballistically identical.  The 9.3x47R is, as the nomenclature suggests, a rimmed cartridge intended for use in double rifles such as the Beretta 689:

…while the rimless 9.3x62mm (sometimes called the 9.3x62mm Mauser) is available for both the Mauser Model 12 and 98:

…the Sako 85 Bavarian:

…the CZ 550 line:

…and SIG Sauer’s Model 100 XT plastic rifle is also available in this caliber:

No prizes for guessing which rifle I’d pick, but let’s just say that full-length stocks make me twitch in all sorts of places, while plastic stocks… never mind.

The 9.3x62mm is expensive to shoot, not so much because of the ammo cost (inexpensive Prvi Partizan sells for around $26 per box, while premium hunting ammo runs around $90 — in other words, pretty much the same as .300 Win Mag) but because the rifles thus chambered are generally super-spendy (with the exception of the Sauer 100 XT rifle, for around $700-$800;  the wood-stocked “Classic” is about $200 more).  CZ-USA doesn’t even issue the 557 in 9.3mm, which is a pity.  (American hunters are already well served with other cartridge choices, which is no doubt the reason CZ didn’t extend the offering.)

As to why the smaller 9.3x62mm is often preferred over the .375 H&H, here’s a decent look at its ballistics.  Also, because the 9.3x62mm can be fired from a “standard” length bolt-action rifle, it’s still cheaper than  the longer “magnum” or “Safari” rifles — and, as the linked article suggests, its sectional density / penetration is pretty much the equal of the .375H&H, for considerably less recoil.

It’s even worse for the rimmed 9.3x47R cartridge (see here for an example), although I note that you can find the excellent Ruger #1 Medium Sporter chambered thusly, for about the same price as a regular quality bolt-action rifle.

 

I don’t think that anyone reading this is going to rush out and buy a rifle in either chambering anytime soon, but should you come across one for a decent price in a garage- or estate sale sometime, know that you won’t be making a bad buy, or buying something shooting an inadequate cartridge.

Categories
Allies

Colion Noir: Gun Nuts | Real Time with Bill Maher (HBO)

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Here Are the House Republicans Who Voted for the Red Flag Laws in the NDAA Bill By Jeff Charles

House Democrats, in their ongoing quest to make it more difficult for Americans to possess firearms, managed to sneak a red flag provision into the latest iteration of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The legislation was passed last week and is headed to the Senate.

Bearing Arms’ Cam Edwards explained:

The military version of the red flag law proposed by Democrats looks a lot like the civilian version found in more than a dozen states. Without being charged or even accused of a crime, a service member could have their right to possess a firearm taken away from them by a military court, and the subject of the red flag order wouldn’t even have a chance to provide any evidence on their behalf for up to 30 days after the court’s order was issued.

Edwards noted that there are “fundamental flaws” with the legislation. He wrote:

Just like with the red flag laws in place in states from California to Connecticut, if a person is found (through a lowered standard of review than what is used in a criminal proceeding) to be a danger to themselves or others by a judge, there’s no actual mental health component to the order removing guns. A supposedly dangerous person can be left with knives, pills, poison, gasoline and matches, and any other tool they might use to take their own life or the lives of others as long as any legally owned guns are taken away.

Edwards also pointed out that each state and the military already have “civil commitment laws on the books.”

But what is noteworthy about the passage of this legislation is that 135 Republican lawmakers voted for it. Gun Owners of America (GOA), a gun rights advocacy group, addressed some of the excuses these Congress members used to justify their “yes” vote. They tweeted:

Some House RINOs who supported Red Flag laws in the #NDAA on Thursday are falsely claiming the bill doesn’t really have gun confiscation orders for the military.

Maybe they didn’t read the bill, but we did.

 

This is not the first time anti-gun Democrats attempted to hide a red flag provision in the NDAA. They did the same thing last year.

Here is a list of each Republican Congress member who voted in support of the NDAA with the red flag provision intact:

Rick W. Allen – Georgia

Mark E. Amodei – Nevada

Don Bacon – Nebraska

James R. Baird – Indiana

Troy Balderson – Ohio

Jim Banks – Indiana

Andy Barr – Kentucky

Cliff Bentz – Oregon

Jack Bergman – Michigan

Stephanie I. Bice – Oklahoma

Gus M. Bilirakis – Florida

Mike Bost – Illinois

Kevin Brady – Texas

Vern Buchanan – Florida

Larry Bucshon – Indiana

Ken Calvert – California

Kat Cammack – Florida

Jerry L. Carl – Alabama

Earl L. “Buddy” Carter – Georgia

John R. Carter – Texas

Madison Cawthorn – North Carolina

Liz Cheney – Wyoming

Tom Cole – Oklahoma

Eric A. “Rick” Crawford – Arkansas

Dan Crenshaw – Texas

Rodney Davis – Illinois

Scott DesJarlais – Tennessee

Mario Diaz-Balart – Florida

Neal P. Dunn – Florida

Jake Ellzey – Texas

Pat Fallon – Texas

Randy Feenstra – Iowa

Drew Ferguson IV – Georgia

Scott Fitzgerald – Wisconsin

Brian K. Fitzpatrick – Pennsylvania

Charles J. “Chuck” Fleischmann – Tennessee

Virginia Foxx – North Carolina

Scott Franklin – Florida

Matt Gaetz – Florida

Mike Gallagher – Wisconsin

Andrew R. Garbarino – New York

Bob Gibbs – Ohio

Carlos A. Gimenez – Florida

Tony Gonzales – Texas

Anthony Gonzalez – Ohio

Kay Granger – Texas

Garret Graves – Louisiana

Sam Graves – Missouri

Mark E. Green – Tennessee

Brett Guthrie – Kentucky

Diana Harshbarger – Tennessee

Vicky Hartzler – Missouri

Jaime Herrera Beutler – Washington

French Hill – Arkansas

Ashley Hinson – Iowa

Trey Hollingsworth – Indiana

Richard Hudson – North Carolina

Darrell Issa – California

Ronny Jackson – Texas

Chris Jacobs – New York

Mike Johnson – Louisiana

Bill Johnson – Ohio

Dusty Johnson – South Dakota

David P. Joyce – Ohio

John Joyce – Pennsylvania

John Katko – New York

Fred Keller – Pennsylvania

Trent Kelly – Mississippi

Mike Kelly – Pennsylvania

Young Kim – California

Adam Kinzinger – Illinois

David Kustoff – Tennessee

Darin LaHood – Illinois

Doug Lamborn – Colorado

Robert E. Latta – Ohio

Jake LaTurner – Kansas

Julia Letlow – Louisiana

Billy Long – Missouri

Frank D. Lucas – Oklahoma

Blaine Luetkemeyer – Missouri

Nancy Mace – South Carolina

Nicole Malliotakis – New York

Tracey Mann – Kansas

Kevin McCarthy – California

Michael T. McCaul – Texas

Lisa C. McClain – Michigan

Patrick T. McHenry – North Carolina

David B. McKinley – West Virginia

Peter Meijer – Michigan

Daniel Meuser – Pennsylvania

Carol D. Miller – West Virginia

Mariannette Miller-Meeks – Iowa

John R. Moolenaar – Michigan

Blake D. Moore – Utah

Gregory F. Murphy – North Carolina

Dan Newhouse – Washington

Devin Nunes – California

Jay Obernolte – California

Greg Pence – Indiana

August Pfluger – Texas

Tom Reed – New York

Guy Reschenthaler – Pennsylvania

Cathy McMorris Rodgers – Washington

Harold Rogers – Kentucky

David Rouzer – North Carolina

Maria Elvira Salazar – Florida

Steve Scalise – Louisiana

Austin Scott – Georgia

Michael K. Simpson – Idaho

Adrian Smith – Nebraska

Christopher H. Smith – New Jersey

Victoria Spartz – Indiana

Pete Stauber – Minnesota

Michelle Steel – California

Elise M. Stefanik – New York

Bryan Steil – Wisconsin

Claudia Tenney – New York

Glenn Thompson – Pennsylvania

Michael R. Turner – Ohio

Fred Upton – Michigan

David G. Valadao – California

Jefferson Van Drew – New Jersey

Beth Van Duyne – Texas

Ann Wagner – Missouri

Tim Walberg – Michigan

Jackie Walorski – Indiana

Michael Waltz – Florida

Brad R. Wenstrup – Ohio

Bruce Westerman – Arkansas

Joe Wilson – South Carolina

Robert J. Wittman – Virginia

Steve Womack – Arkansas

Don Young – Alaska

It is not yet clear whether the red flag provision will survive the Senate. While GOP lawmakers in the House might believe they will get away with supporting the legislation, Senate Republicans might not be willing to take such a risk — given the slim lead the Democrats have in the upper chamber. Moreover, there could be some Democrats who oppose the bill for various reasons.

Either way, it is important to keep an eye on this particular proposal. If the Democrats get their way, it could set a precedent that would make it easier for them to enact federal red flag laws on the rest of the country.

Jeff Charles

Jeff Charles is the host of “A Fresh Perspective” podcast and co-host of the Red + Black Show.

Jeff is also a freelance writer and political contributor who has appeared on Fox Soul and the First TV Network.

He enjoys reading, binging TV shows, learning to play the banjo (badly), and all things nerdy.

If you wish to reach out to him for tips on stories or just to yell at him, send an email to jeff@afreshperspectiveshow.com.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Biden Administration Asks the U.S. Supreme Court to Judicially Nullify the Right to Bear Arms (Good luck on that one!)

Biden Administration Asks the U.S. Supreme Court to Judicially Nullify the Right to Bear Arms

On September 21, the Biden Administration filed an amicus brief in the pending U.S. Supreme Court case of New York Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, supporting New York’s draconian and unconstitutional restrictions on the right to bear firearms in public for self-defense.

This NRA-supported challenge to New York’s “may-issue” licensing scheme for public handgun carry is the first Second Amendment challenge to a firearm law to reach the high court since 2010.

New York’s law presumptively denies the right to bear arms for self-defense unless a license applicant can demonstrate a special need for self-protection that distinguishes the person from the general population.

In practice, this means the rich and well-connected can get unrestricted carry licenses but ordinary people cannot, even if they actually face a greater risk of being violently victimized while going about their daily lives in public. The law effectively nullifies for most New Yorkers what the Supreme Court has already characterized as “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.”

New York’s “may-issue” scheme in fact gives authorities so much discretion that it has fostered a culture of corruption, particularly within the Licensing Division of the New York City Police Department (NYPD). There have been repeated scandals involving the NYPD Licensing Division’s application process, with “facilitators” offering gifts and bribes to licensing personnel to approve or expedite their clients’ applications.

In some cases, this has resulted in the issuance of carry licenses to applicants with otherwise disqualifying criminal histories and in criminal convictions for NYPD officers. In other locales, licenses are issued by elected sheriffs, with preference given to political donors and supporters.

The entire point of the New York scheme is not simply or primarily to screen out applicants who fail to meet objective standards of responsible and law-abiding behavior. It is to give authorities complete control over who gets to exercise the right and who does not.

This, of course, is wholly incompatible with the idea of a fundamental right, which exists, as the Supreme Court said in the Second Amendment context, “to take certain policy choices off the table.” If the starting point for a carry licensing scheme is presumptive denial, then there is no right at all, only a privilege administered to the favored few.

And this is absolutely fine for the Biden Administration, at least when it comes to the Second Amendment.

After all, as we’ve reported, Biden’s own son Hunter has the manifest privilege of violating with impunity various federal gun control laws the government brief insists are so necessary to protect public safety. This is in addition to his apparent immunity to other laws against things like drug possession and distribution, prostitution, and the list continues.

The government’s brief, filed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Justice, also gives complete vindication to the NRA’s opposition to now Attorney General Merrick Garland’s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016, when he was a federal appellate judge.

Anti-gun pundits had mocked that opposition at the time, falsely claiming there was no legal basis for it, even though Garland had voted to rehear a case that had ruled an outright ban on handgun possession violated the Second Amendment. Yet, as we had explained, the only plausible reason to support such a “do-over” was that the court had come to the wrong conclusion. Why repeat something already done correctly?

Now, as AG, Garland is advocating that the U.S. Supreme Court effectively remove the right to “bear arms” from the U.S. Constitution.  The administration’s brief additionally argues for what it calls a “reasonable regulation” standard for other types of gun control and for its implementation via “intermediate scrutiny.” Activist and anti-gun courts have used this standard to uphold not just may-issue licensing schemes but sweeping bans on some of America’s most popular types of firearms and magazines.

Fortunately, the United States Senate blocked Garland’s Supreme Court appointment in 2016. Thus, while his noxious view of the Second Amendment will still be put forth before the court, he at least won’t have the opportunity to cast a vote against the right to bear arms himself, as he undoubtedly would have.

While no outcome at the Supreme Court is ever guaranteed, Second Amendment advocates should if anything be in an even stronger position this time around than during the court’s prior visitations of the Second Amendment in 2008 and 2010.

And Merrick Garland –Barack Obama’s handpicked choice to replace the legendary Justice Antonin Scalia, author of the landmark Second Amendment opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller – will have to watch from the sidelines as just another lawyer.

Categories
All About Guns

Why buy a Mossberg 500

Categories
Uncategorized

Most Firearm Offenses in Illinois are for Firearms Possession by Black Men by Dean Weingarten

Facts Truth Fake Bogus Research

Paper: Most Firearm Offenses in Illinois are for Firearms Possession by Black Men IMG iStock

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- In a paper published at Loyola University Chicago, describing the make-up of people convicted for firearms possession, few surprises are found. These are the major findings listed in the executive summary of the paper, published in July of 2021. From luc.edu:

1) The majority of felony firearm possession convictions in Illinois occur in Cook County, primarily involve Black men, and are disproportionately concentrated in specific Chicago neighborhoods;

2) The majority—52%–of felony firearm possession convictions in Illinois involved Class X, 2, or 3 felony offenses of a person with a prior felony conviction possessing a firearm; 34% involved a Class 4 felony offense;

3) For the least serious felony firearm possession offense (e.g., a Class 4 felony), one-third (33%) of the statewide convictions stemmed from arrests in 11 of Chicago’s 77 neighborhoods. Of those convicted of a Class 4 felony firearm possession offense, 74% were 18-24 year-olds;

4) As a result of increased arrests, and mandatory prison sentences for most firearm possession offenses, prison admissions for these crimes increased 27% between 2014 and 2019, while admissions for all other crimes fell 38%;

5) Legislative changes in 2011 and 2018 to Class 4 felony firearm possession offenses primarily impacted sentencing practices in Cook County;

6) Of those firearm possession offenses where prison is not mandatory under all circumstances (i.e., the Class 4 felony offenses), those convicted in Cook County were more likely to be sentenced to prison than in the rest of Illinois;

7) The vast majority of those sentenced to prison for firearm possession offenses were not arrested for a violent crime within 3 years of release from prison. Having a prior conviction for a violent crime was a stronger predictor of a subsequent arrest for a violent crime, and the majority of those convicted and sentenced to prison for firearm possession offenses do not have prior convictions for violent crimes;

8) Those sentenced to probation or prison in Cook County for a Class 4 firearm possession offense had similar, and relatively low, rates of arrests for a violent crime within 3 years of sentencing after taking into account other characteristics correlated with recidivism, including age, sex, and prior criminal history.

Many young black men are being arrested for firearms possession. These men are mostly from the most dangerous neighborhoods in the United States. Most of these men would rather take the chance of being arrested compared to the chance of being defenseless when attacked. Some of these cases are arrests when the firearm is being used in defense of self and others. We do not know the percentage.

Firearm Possession Sentencing in Illinois by AmmoLand Shooting Sports News on Scribd

From AmmoLand.com:

On Monday, 22 March, in Chicago, 15 people were recorded as being shot. Three of them were killed. One of those shot is recorded as acting in self-defense, on the South Side of Chicago.

In the gun culture, the phrase is: better tried by 12 than carried by 6.

Many of the arrests are for not having a Firearms Owner Identification card (FOID). The requirement to apply to the state to obtain permission to own a firearm is repugnant to the Second Amendment. From AmmoLand.com:

Judge T. Scott Webb, of White County, Illinois, Found the requirement to obtain a (FOID) before owning a firearm in Illinois, to be unconstitutional.

Gun Control in the United States has racist roots. The purpose of gun control was to disarm disfavored minorities, so the establishment could better control them. At first, this was mostly applied to black people. As time went on, it was applied to more and more people.

Black people have been severely discriminated against in their legal ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Once someone is convicted of felony gun possession, their chance of ever regaining their ability to legally exercise Second Amendment rights is almost non-existent.

This sets up a vicious feedback loop, where people in dysfunctional black communities do not trust the police. They do not get FOID cards or concealed carry licenses. They are arrested for carrying for self-defense. They are now felons. The distrust of the police and the system grows.

Shall issue permits only started gaining ground in the late 1980s. Constitutional Carry stated increasing in 2003.

The establishment in Chicago has done everything it can to perpetuate this cycle. There is not a single public range in Chicago, because of local government restrictions. Certified shooting instruction is required to obtain a concealed carry permit in Illinois. The wait time for concealed carry permits and FOID cards is measured in months, approaching years. For a young man of 18, who faces daily threats to his life in the worst of Chicago neighborhoods, carrying legally becomes an impossibility.

Because legal carry and training are exceedingly arduous in Chicago, maintaining a gun culture of responsibility and training becomes difficult, unlike much of the rest of the United States.

Training and legal exercise of Second Amendment rights could help reverse this cycle. From foxnews.com:

After last week’s appearance at CPAC, Toure told Politico that he began advocating for gun rights in the inner cities after seeing friends locked up for avoidable gun possession charges. He wants to continue the legacy of Malcolm X, the black nationalist who was assassinated in 1965, who expressed softer views on race following his pilgrimage to the holy Muslim city of Mecca.

“We go where there’s high violence, high crime, high gun control — high slave mentalities, to be perfectly honest — and inform urban America about their human right, as stated in the Second Amendment, to defend their life,” Toure told the magazine.

In spite of the barriers, some black people in the dysfunctional neighborhoods are legally arming themselves. They serve as examples of how people can protect themselves legally and have the police as allies instead of adversaries. Former Police Chief James Craig in Detroit, and Sheriff Clarke in Milwaukee County, earned much praise for championing concealed carry as a way to stop crime.

Trust in the police is paramount. Trust has to be earned. It is a feedback loop. Where there is trust in the police, crime drops too low levels. Where police are not trusted, crime rises astronomically.

The BLM and Antifa platforms seem calculated to destroy trust in the police. They appear designed to move the United States from a high trust nation to a low trust nation.

Examples of high trust nations would be Switzerland or Canada. Examples of low-trust nations would be Mexico or South Africa.

It is possible to have a high trust nation like the United States, with pockets of low trust communities, such as we exist today. Those who wish to see the United States in chaos or destroyed, are working hard to increase and spread distrust.


About Dean Weingarten:

Dean Weingarten has been a peace officer, a military officer, was on the University of Wisconsin Pistol Team for four years, and was first certified to teach firearms safety in 1973. He taught the Arizona concealed carry course for fifteen years until the goal of Constitutional Carry was attained. He has degrees in meteorology and mining engineering and retired from the Department of Defense after a 30-year career in Army Research, Development, Testing, and Evaluation.

Dean Weingarten

Categories
All About Guns

I like the way that this man thinks!

"'The Bill of Rights' is not 'The Bill of Needs'" T-shirt

Categories
Well I thought it was neat!

Tips and Tactics for Hunting the West by Aram von Benedikt

Tips and Tactics for Hunting the West

Many hunters dream of stalking the wild reaches of the American West; of hearing a bull elk scream his challenge to the dawn, witnessing a magnificent mule deer buck silhouetted against the sky, and glassing pronghorn antelope on the high-desert plains. It’s a worthy dream, and if you’re one who possesses it you should do your best to bring it to fruition.

However, hunting the public lands of the West is no longer a simple endeavor. Unless you’re a wealthy person, rising costs and fierce competition for tags have, in many cases, relegated your chances to the turn of a lottery wheel. It’s not good, and the prognosis for the future isn’t pretty either. However, for the hunter with courage, resourcefulness and a bit of skill, opportunity still exists. Here’s how to begin turning your dreams into reality:

Hunters with large bull elk


Lottery Tags and General Tags

The first thing to understand about hunting in most Western states is that the tags are divided into two basic types: lottery and general. The lottery tags must be applied for during a specific application period and are very prized (and very hard to draw). The general tags are often available over-the-counter (OTC), but in some states, such as Utah and Colorado, some or all of the general tags must be applied for during a specific application period as well. The key to developing a successful western hunting strategy is to weave both general and lottery tag hunts into the plan, thereby enabling you to go hunting and have great experiences, while at the same time developing your skills toward the time that you draw one of those prized lottery tags.

Hunters in Western timber


Trophy Hunting vs. Experience Hunting
Once you understand the tag situation it becomes obvious that, due to the lottery/general tag element, there are two types of experiences:

Lottery: If you draw a lottery tag, you can expect a great hunt for a big mature buck or bull. If you practice with your chosen weapon until you are very proficient, get yourself in really good physical condition and hunt hard, you have a very good chance of harvesting the buck or bull of your dreams. But the lottery system is not all roses. In most cases, your chances of drawing a tag are only one in several hundred, and in some cases one in many thousands. If you’re strategic and persistent you’ll probably draw one or more eventually, but it will entail a significant investment over the years.

Hunter placing tag on mule deer buck antler


General:
 If you purchase or draw a general tag, you should expect a great experience hunting the West for an iconic species, but mature animals will be very scarce and hunting pressure very high. The beauty of these hunts is that you can actually go elk hunting or mule deer hunting. Sure, you probably won’t kill a monster buck or bull, but if you’re well-prepared and hunt hard, you’ll likely have a chance to harvest a buck or bull. You’ll get to watch the sun rise over the Rocky Mountains, smell the high-country pines under the afternoon sun and stalk along a crystal mountain stream. You’ll harvest the experience, and with luck, some meat for the freezer and antlers for the memories. And there is always the chance, however small, that you’ll get a big mature animal despite the odds. It happens every year.

Hunter glassing Western mountains for game

Multi-Year Strategy
If you only want to hunt the West once, your best plan is probably just to save your money, hire a reputable outfitter and have a good time. However, if you thirst for adventure and enjoy DIY hunting, you should adopt a multi-year strategy involving tag applications in a handful of Western states, and general-season hunts in those same states. Here’s why:

Let’s say you hunger to hunt elk and mule deer. Drawing a premium lottery tag for either will take you a double handful of years to draw, or more. Applying for multiple states will up your odds, though, so you put in for Utah, Colorado and Idaho. Most states require you to purchase a hunting license prior to submitting your application, which will range from $65 to $160 per state. Each species you apply for will cost an additional $5 to $25 per state. So let’s say you’re looking at roughly $500 to apply for deer and elk in three states each year. Get it done, every year, and keep your fingers crossed. If you want you can add applications in Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Wyoming and for pronghorn, coues deer and so on. Eventually you will probably draw the tag of a lifetime.

Hunter with mule deer buck

The second part of your strategy is to apply for or purchase general-season tags each year in those same states. You’ve already bought your hunting licenses, so that cost is covered. You can draw a second or third season deer tag in Colorado every year as a nonresident, so hunt there while you build the required two or three preference points to draw a good general deer tag in Utah. Meanwhile, purchase an OTC Idaho archery elk permit, and hunt in the same territory that you hope to draw a lottery rifle tag in someday. That way you’ll know the area and be ready to hunt it effectively when that magic tag arrives in the mail. The same strategy is valid in Utah; you can hunt the rifle season with a general spike bull elk tag on the same unit where you hope to draw a trophy bull tag someday. Sure, it’s only a spike, but who cares? It’ll taste great, and you’ll get to hunt awesome country and see huge bulls. It’s rather ironic, but it’s still a fun challenge to pass up a bunch of big bulls in search of the littlest bull on the mountain. But the real point is, you’ll be learning the country and building skill as an elk hunter.

Hunters with spike bull elk

The beauty of this system is that your Western hunting adventures are only limited by the time you can spend afield and your imagination. It is entirely possible to hunt three or four states every fall for deer and/or elk. And if you do that, you’ll likely learn to kill big, mature animals on general, public-land, OTC units long before you draw one of those coveted lottery tags.

Young hunter with mule deer buck

Good States
Here’s a list of some of the best states for both general and lottery hunts. Giving a blow-by-blow breakdown of exactly what each state has to offer is beyond the scope of this article, but I’ll try to mention a couple strong points of each. Beyond that it’s up to you to do your research and decide what best fits your own strategy.

• Colorado: Great OTC elk hunting and arguably the finest mule deer hunting on earth. Very high hunter pressure on public lands. Some good pronghorn hunting as well, though much of the pronghorn habitat is private property.

• Utah: Offers fantastic trophy elk hunting on lottery tags. The odds of drawing one of those tags are incredibly low, but you have to try. Average to poor mule deer hunting on most general areas, though some great bucks are killed on general areas each year. Good OTC general “spike only” elk hunting.

Hunter in snow near creek hunting the West

• Wyoming: Fantastic deer and elk hunting, but nonresidents must draw for everything and odds are not great. Wilderness areas are closed to nonresident hunters unless they have a guide. Arguably the best pronghorn hunting in the West.

• Idaho: Tons of pressure from other hunters is the first thing you will notice when hunting Idaho, but good hunting for mule deer, elk, black bear and wolves is available if you’re willing and able to work for it. Some tags are available OTC, the rest via a point-free lottery system.

• New Mexico: Great elk and pronghorn hunting via lottery or landowner tags. Coues deer in southwestern regions. Public lands are limited.

• Nevada: Awesome elk and deer hunting, mostly available only by lottery. Good high-country, early-season archery mule deer opportunities.

• Arizona: Some of the best elk and mule deer hunting in the west, but very hard to draw a tag in the great areas. Good Coues deer hunting over most of the southern portion of the state. Archery mule deer tags available over the counter for certain areas.

• Montana: Great Western hunting for elk, mule deer, whitetail, pronghorn and more. Tags can be hard to draw, but not like Utah or Arizona. Public lands more limited than some states.

Hunter glassing vast, open snow-covered mountains in the West

Conclusion
We apply for lottery tags because we must. We apply for and purchase general tags because we can, and therein lays the beauty of hunting our Western public lands. You and I have the right to buy our tags, shoulder our pack and rifle and sally forth into the wild territory of the West in search of adventure, meat and memories each year. God willing that right will remain, so let’s do our part to keep public lands clean, protect our wildlife and conserve our rights. Play fair with other hunters, exercise good ethics and maybe someday I’ll see you out there, stalking the same buck or bull that I am. You can have the first shot, unless he’s very big and very old. In that case you’ll have to beat me to it.

Want to read more from Aram von Benedikt? Check out the following articles:
• How to Prep for Elk Hunting: Physical Fitness, Mental Toughness, Shooting Skills and Shot Placement
• Hunting African Plains Game: How and Where to Place Your Shot
• Dream Hunt: How to Make an African Safari Come True
• Top 5 Backcountry Hunting Rifles
• Hunting Cartridges: Rising Starts of the New Millennium
• Tips and Tactics for DIY Hunting and Fishing in Hawaii
• Peccary Quest: Where and How to Hunt Javelina
• Tips and Tactics for Hunting Western Cottontails
• How to Convince Your Wife to Let You Buy as Many Guns as You Want
• Backcountry Survival Tips: How to Deal with Disaster
• DIY Backcountry Hunting Tactics and Gear
• How to Be an Ethical Long-Range Hunter
• Tips and Tactics for Hunting Coues Deer
• Essential Stalking and Still-Hunting Skills
• A Beginner’s Guide to Traditional Bowhunting
• 6.5 Creedmoor Proven: How Does It Actually Perform on Big Game?
• How Hunting Rifles & Gear Have Evolved Over the Last 50 Years
• How to Sharpen a Knife
• How to Set Up Your Rifle and Scope for Long-Range Dialing
• 7 Common Predator Hunting Mistakes to Avoid
• 6 Tips for Hunting Public-Land Mule Deer
• 10 Tips for Bowhunting Elk
 Tips and Tactics for Bowhunting Mule Deer
• How Do You Build the Ultimate Western Big-Game Rifle?
• 10 Ways to Prep for Your Next Western Big-Game Hunt
• Tips and Tactics for Hunting Canyon-Country Gobblers
• 12 Tips for Shed Hunting the West

Categories
All About Guns Well I thought it was neat!

It must be nice to be able to afford one of these!

Purdey Celebrates 200 Years With Commemorative Guns, Apparel and  Accessories - Shotgun Life

Categories
All About Guns

I myself haven’t a clue so does anybody have an answer?