Categories
All About Guns

You could do a whole lot worse than this Combo!

Categories
Our Great Kids Soldiering The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People War

Vietnam War: 1/503 of 173rd Infantry On Patrol in September 1970

Categories
All About Guns

Refurbishing a Carry Revolver by CHRISTOPHER MACE

If you didn’t just start carrying a handgun recently, and have been doing so for a while, you probably have noticed that carrying a particular pistol every day can be hard on it. Everyday carry pistols get worn on the finish, dirt in the internals, sweat, pocket lint, you name it. Depending upon your particular practice routine, they may also be fired quite regularly and have internal wear as well-which is accelerated by the aforementioned crud that gets inside them.

A lot of handguns that are carried daily emit a plume of lint and dust when the first round is fired out of them on the range, from all of the crud they collect. Most people I know end up replacing their daily carry piece every few years-usually when something they like better comes along. And that’s probably just as well, given how hard daily carry can be on a firearm. But it doesn’t have to be like that if you really like what you have.

This is the starting point for this project; a well worn carry revolver.

The subject of today’s article is a former everyday carry piece of mine. It’s a Taurus 445ti revolver, chambered in .44 Special. It was my everyday carry for several years. It had some fairly significant finish wear as a result. The original rubber grip really needed to be replaced. It had worn down considerably, and the rubber itself had degraded significantly. It also needed the internals cleaned out, as carry pistols tend to accumulate dirt and crud inside (or at least mine always do). I also wanted to do something to improve the front sight. But this particular revolver has a ported barrel, so unfortunately I couldn’t come up with a good option for improving the front sight because the ports are right at the front sight and would likely damage a sight insert (to that end, if someone reading this has any suggestions, I’d love to hear them). In spite of this, it is still in very good shape mechanically speaking. It locks uptight and is still properly timed, so I didn’t need to do any major internal work. The reasons it appealed to me years ago, still do. And so, I decided to refurbish it.

It’s amazing how much crud accumulates inside of a daily carry handgun!

At one point I took it to a local gunsmith where I lived at the time to see about modifying the hammer. I wanted him to modify the hammer to make the pistol a bit more user friendly for carry. Specifically, I wanted to have the hammer shortened, and then the stub built up. Basically, I was trying to mimic the “pocket hammer” that was on some of the older Charter Arms .44 Special revolvers from a few decades ago. I guess I didn’t make my request clear enough as this gentleman simply bobbed the hammer, and serrated the small stub he’d left.

Unfortunately, this didn’t give me enough leverage to cock the hammer for single-action, which was a capability I really wanted to retain. At the time I didn’t have the skills or equipment to do this job myself. Every time I looked at the hammer, it irked me. So when the grips started showing real wear, I set this revolver in the back of the safe. As part of this project, I am going to rework the hammer to what I had originally envisioned.

Don’t pry the side plate off of any revolver: you’ll damage it. Tap the frame with the handle of a screwdriver and it’ll pop out.

The first step was to disassemble the revolver. If you’ve never worked on a revolver, it is a bit intimidating. But they’re really not that complicated if you understand how the particular model functions. Most Taurus revolvers are similar in operation to Smith and Wesson revolvers. The grip and screw were the first parts to remove. After that, I removed the sideplate. Removing the sideplate has a few considerations of its own.

First, keep track of which sideplate screws came from which hole, as they are not all the same. Then to actually remove the sideplate, tap the frame with a screwdriver handle. A couple of raps and the plate will pop out. Do not try to pry the sideplate out; you WILL damage it. I went further with disassembly than what’s normally necessary because I wanted to refinish it. With everything operating how it should, and the fact that this particular revolver isn’t that old relatively speaking,

I didn’t replace any of the internal parts or springs. I didn’t feel it was necessary in this case. If you are working on something older or with more wear, I would go ahead and replace the springs while you have everything apart anyway. Once it was disassembled, I proceeded to give everything a good cleaning.

I TIG welded material onto the hammer spur, in order to build it up. I added enough material to give me enough leverage to cock the hammer without difficulty.

As I mentioned, I wanted to reconfigure the hammer to be more to my liking. I wanted a hammer that was not prone to snagging like a regular spur hammer because this is a carry piece. But I also wanted to have single-action capability for the same reason. As I mentioned earlier, my inspiration came from the “pocket hammers” Charter Arms put on some of their revolvers at one point. The modification done previously didn’t allow for enough leverage to cock the hammer. So I needed to build up the hammer spur in order to get that leverage. I TIG welded the hammer to accomplish this task. But obviously, the hammer is a heat-treated part. So it was necessary to control where the heat was allowed to go. I used heat stop paste from Brownells to assist with this task. I applied it liberally around the surfaces that contact the fire control components. I basically welded in layers, allowing the part to cool between them. This also helped in keeping the heat out from where I didn’t want it. Once the hammer had enough material added, it was time to file it into the final shape and size. Then, I used a checkering file to serrate the hammer both for a better gripping surface and general aesthetics. Lastly, I used cold blue to put a finish on the freshly welded metal.

I used a 30 LPI checkering file to cut the serrations into the hammer.
I used a cold blue to put a finish on the welded material.

While I had everything apart, I figured I’d go ahead and clean up the trigger a little. There is a commonly held opinion that trigger work could potentially result in legal trouble if it were used in a defensive shooting. I’m not one to argue such things, as I really would rather not be a test case, so I don’t consider major trigger work on “duty weapons”. So this being something I will probably carry again, all I really wanted to do here is to remove a few rough edges or burrs to smooth things up a little. I used stones and other abrasives to polish out machining marks and other roughness on the interior surfaces of the frame where the various fire control parts function. In all reality, this would happen naturally through wear to some degree just by the action being cycled. This work I did just accelerated the process by manually “wearing” these surfaces smooth. At any rate, this sort of work does smooth out the trigger pull rather nicely. Really, a lot of internal revolver work involves this concept.

I polished the surfaces inside the frame where the fire control parts have contact. I find that these things from the beauty department of your local store work very well for polishing up hard to reach spaces.

Since this revolver had some finish wear from years of daily carry, I decided to refinish it. Because of the titanium frame and components, regular bluing was out as was parkerizing. So I really felt like the only options were more modern spray-on finishes. I used Alumahyde from Brownells for this purpose, since I had some on hand. This actual process I will describe in a future article. However, I should go over a couple of considerations for refinishing this particular firearm. Since this is a double-action revolver, care should be taken not to rough up the internal surfaces. Those surfaces need to be smooth to have a decent trigger pull. Part of the prep work for applying this, or most other modern spray on finishes, involves sandblasting the metal surfaces to allow the finish to adhere. Obviously, this would indeed rough up those critical surfaces. You also really want to take care with a number of surfaces of a revolver if you’re going to refinish it with these types of finish, such as the portion of the crane the cylinder actually rotates on, the ejector rod, the inside of the frame, etc. So while you absolutely can refinish a revolver with these types of finishes, some thought and care is required if you want good results.

Pay attention to the sideplate screws, as you remove them; specifically which one came from which hole. They are not all the same, as you can see. The screw that actually retains the cylinder assembly is almost always different from the rest and must go back into the same place for things to work.

After the parts were refinished, I reassembled them. Obviously, this is basically done in the reverse order of disassembly. Just like when you took it off, exercise some care putting the sideplate back on. With revolver internals not typically accessible during routine cleaning, it’s a good idea to lubricate them while you have everything disassembled anyway. I usually don’t get too far down the rabbit hole that is firearm lubricants, but this time I’ll recommend something specific. I really like Froglube for lubricating revolver internals. Unlike oils and solvents, it stays where you put it and doesn’t dry up; two excellent qualities for this particular task. I’ve had very good luck with it in revolvers. However, you definitely want to apply it sparingly due to all of the crud and dirt that gets into carry revolvers as I mentioned earlier. And to finish it off, the last thing I did was install the new grip. I chose a rubber grip from Hogue. I feel as though a nice cushioned rubber grip helps keep this revolver comfortable enough to shoot regularly.

Here is the completed revolver, after reworking.

Sometimes all it takes is a little tune-up, and it’s like you have a whole new firearm. I took a revolver languishing in the back of the safe with some wear and quirks and reworked it into something a lot more to my liking. If you have a daily carry piece, I would recommend that you detail disassemble it, clean it out, and replace springs at regular intervals to keep it in the best shape possible. An occasional refinishing when it needs it isn’t a bad idea either. You are trusting your life with it after all. Of course, these techniques will be also applicable to a variety of other firearms that might not be daily carry pistols. Until next time, Happy ‘Smithing!

Categories
Gear & Stuff

ZF-41: Germany’s Worst Sniper Scope

Categories
All About Guns

Chinese C96 “Wauser” Broomhandle

Categories
All About Guns

SAKO Model 85 Bavarian Rifle 270

Categories
All About Guns

Pumpkinhead vs Desert Dog (Colt .357 Peacekeeper)

Categories
All About Guns

Browning BLR .300 WinMag

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California Cops

LAPD chief blames guns for California’s gun control failures By Tom Knighton (Gee I am so “shocked” by this! Grumpy)

(AP Photo/Reed Saxon)
California has the toughest state-level gun control laws in the nation. They heavily restrict pretty much every category of firearm imaginable and they’re constantly looking at how they can further restrict them.

And yet, cities in the state aren’t necessarily safer than anywhere else in the nation.

Despite that, the chief of the LAPD blames…wait for it…guns.

Thirty-four people were shot in Los Angeles last week, a bloody spike in what is already shaping up to be a violent month and year in the City of Angels, according to authorities.

 

The bulk of the shootings — 23 — of them occurred in a “remarkably small area” of the Los Angeles Police Department’s 77th Street and Southeast divisions, Chief Michel Moore told the Los Angeles Police Commission Tuesday. Moore called last week a “troubling week,” in a year when violent crime has increased 7.1% year-to-date. So far this year, the LAPD has responded to 575 more violent crimes than this time last year.

 

Barely halfway through the month, 70 people have already been shot in Los Angeles, up from 55 during the same period last year. There have been 107 homicides so far in 2022, while at this point in 2021 there were 109.

 

While the number has decreased slightly in 2022, Moore said it represents a 37% increase over a two-year period. Overall, violent crime — aggravated assaults, street robberies, and commercial robberies — have climbed 15.2 percent over a two-year period.

“The problem that we have throughout Los Angeles is too many guns in too many hands,” Moore said, reiterating a belief he frequently shares with the commission. The added enforcement in the 77th Street Division resulted in 16 gun arrests involving 20 firearms, including “a number of assault rifles,” Moore said.

So, the issue is guns in the most heavily gun-controlled state in the nation?

Sounds to me an awful lot like all the copious amounts of gun control has managed to accomplish is just make the state more hostile toward law-abiding gun owners, rather than actually do much to curb gun possession by violent criminals.

This isn’t much different than the gang heyday of the 1990s when LA was the epicenter of criminal culture.

Since then, the state has passed tons of gun control, ostensibly to impact those same criminals.

As we can see, it worked like a charm.

Look, I get the desire to do something. I also get that people think the problem is the wrong people having guns. I’m not going to argue about armed criminals.

But the laws on the books were designed to stop precisely them from having them, yet it doesn’t appear to have accomplished a blasted thing. Meanwhile, Californians who want to comply with the law are treated like criminals for even wanting a firearm.

It’s just not right.

Then again, it’s never been right to restrict the rights of the ordinary citizen because of the actions of a handful of criminals.

Yet when the LAPD chief talks about too many guns in too many hands rather than the wrong hands, what do you think he’s proposing? Is he acknowledging that gun control has failed the state, or do you think he’s suggesting more of the same?

Well, since he says the problem is “too many hands” and nothing about criminals in possession, it’s clear where he stands on the issue.

It’s also clear that more of the same isn’t going to make things better.

————————————————————
By the way, 77th Station is right in the middle of the meanest, toughest Gang Neighborhood in Southern California. I should know as I got a lot of students from there for my class in Juvenile Hall. Grumpy

 

 

 

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California

Bill allowing gun lawsuits in California passes committee By Tom Knighton (The only ones who will win from this is the Lawyers! Grumpy)

Daniel6D / Pixabay
Federal law says that you cannot sue a gun company or licensed dealer for the actions of a third party unless they somehow broke the law in providing that firearm. It’s been on the books for years now, even if anti-gunners don’t like it.

However, California has decided to model a bill after the Texas law that allows people to sue abortion providers that would, in theory, circumvent precisely that law.

And now, it’s passed committee.

 In response to recent gun violence across the state and nation, lawmakers are pushing ahead with efforts to strengthen gun laws in California.

Two bills aiming to bolster California’s gun laws cleared key committees on Tuesday.

“While in California we pride ourselves having fairly strict gun control laws, we’ve done better than other states but still, not good enough,” said Assembly Member Phil Ting, D-San Francisco.

Assembly Bill 1594 passed its first hearing in the Assembly Judiciary Committee in a 7-2 vote.

The bill would allow private citizens, local governments and the state attorney general to sue gun makers and sellers. Supporters said the measure would make sure the gun industry faces accountability like every other industry.

“I don’t think it’s very fair that the toy industry has a lot more liability than the gun industry,” Ting said.

Except, that’s not remotely accurate.

If a firearm malfunctions and causes injury, it can be sued just like any other company can if its product malfunctions and causes harm.

What protections it has only protect them from lawsuits stemming from the actions of other parties. In other words, you can’t sue Glock because a criminal with a Glock shot you unless you can show Glock did something wrong that contributed to that shooting.

California is trying to run an end-around that law and pretending their holding gun companies to the same standards.

However, as gun rights advocates have pointed out for years, no one is trying to sue Toyota for drunk drivers.

In other words, yes, gun companies have protections other companies don’t have, but only because they’ve needed protections other industries haven’t.

For what it’s worth, I don’t see this law surviving challenge because federal law supersedes it.

Yet that’s going to be a costly fight that shouldn’t have to be waged. Further, since few criminals are lawfully buying guns, it’s clearly not the place to look.

Then again, this is California. They’re not known for disagreeing with gun control measures. They’ll pass this not because they think it’ll make the state safer, but because they just don’t want people being able to buy guns in the state.

If they can make it more costly to do business in California, they may well hope that companies will just opt not to sell guns in California.

Then again, with the rules already in place, not many actually are.

Frankly, this law is going to be a complete trainwreck and I really, really wish the state of California could be punished for passing it knowing damn good and well it goes beyond their authority. Since they can’t, we’ll just have to be content to see it overturned by the courts.