Categories
This great Nation & Its People Well I thought it was funny!

Ministers

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Anti-Gun Partisan Lawfare? GWACS Sues KE Arms et al.

Categories
All About Guns

General Atomics Hypersonic Blitzer

Categories
All About Guns Art

Vickers Machine Gun – In The Movies

Categories
All About Guns

What I call having a lot of fun!

Categories
All About Guns

Combat Shotguns of the Vietnam War | Collector’s and History Corner

Categories
California

Back in the Glory days of Los Angeles!

The Motormat drive-in in Los Angeles, 1948. The food tray was sent out on rails right to your car. The little awnings provided a shade for your food.

HISTORIC LOS ANGELES
The Track
What could go wrong? One of the most intriguing L.A. architectural novelties we’ve ever seen was this take on the drive-in. It’s The Track, with “Motormat” technology, “Track” apparently a reference to racetrack—hence the striped service trolleys that were sent out to cars at 120 feet per minute, each unit named after a famous racehorse.
A theme, however, was not enough in the face of Rube Goldberg technology. You just know the crazy trolley system must have hit snags constantly, with burgers and fries and chicken wings and cokes flying all over the hoods of Hudsons and DeSotos…and yet at one time there seems to have been as many as three outlets in the Los Angeles area, for however long they lasted. Here’s a description of the operation from The American Drive-In, by Michael Karl Witzel:

“Debuted in 1949, a Los Angeles innovation promised total elimination of carhops. At a new drive-in called “The Track,” it attracted customers from as far as Santa Monica with its unique type of service. Like a group of horses at a trough [there’s a gracious image], cars ringed around a central building, forming a circular pattern. Twenty semicircular parking spaces bridged a center kitchen by means of metal tracks. Food and condiments rode the rails within carrying…compartment[s] each powered by a small ½-horsepower motor…. The mechanical setup was reminiscent of the wackiest Rube Goldberg device. Positioned in a pre-determined [?] parking space, the diner rolled down the car window and was greeted by a stainless-steel bin that could be made flush with the door. Inside the box were plastic cups, a water bottle, menu, order pad, and change tray. It was large, too. Food for six people could be ferried back and forth on the elevated platforms. Patrons would jot down their orders and with the push of a button, the unit scooted a return to the kitchen…. When the empty bin arrived at the kitchen, an attendant put through the order and added up the bill. As hamburgers and other entrées were prepared, the rail box made its second journey to the automobile to collect the money. By the time it returned to the preparation area, the food was ready to go—loaded into the compartment along with condiments and the customer’s change. According to inventor Kenneth C. Purdy, the spoke-and-wheel-track arrangement sped service 20-25 percent.”

Well, needless to say, we wanted to know where this madcap drive-in was. There was a 1951 phone-book listing for a “The Track No 3” at 3816 Sepulveda Boulevard in Culver City, now the site of a Carl Jr’s, but current visual cues there don’t jive with the vintage shots seen here. So we squinted at the pics, especially the one at top, and decided that the sign on the Herman-Something real estate office must have said “Herman Shrager”—who, it turns out, dealt in cemetery real estate, as in plots.

Anyway, after more digging we found that Herman had an office at 8152 Beverly Boulevard…and eureka! It all fell into place. Across from Herman’s one-time haunt, at the northwest corner of Beverly and Kilkea Drive, the distinctive Welch’s Candy building still stands…and so across Kilkea from Welch’s would have been The Track, at 8123 Beverly.
The mini-chain’s other locations may have survived longer, but with maintenance obviously a nightmare and profits hindered with what was clearly too much real estate given over to servicing too few cars, it was all over in a few years. Advertisements for an auction of the pieces of The Track appeared in the Times in February 1952.

The view from the kitchen, above. Below:
Assuming that the contraption made it out to his car,
the driver received his order in this box:

As seen in the Los Angeles Times on February 17, 1952
 Looking north today at Beverly Boulevard and Kilkea Drive

The Track
PLEASE ALSO SEE OUR COMPANION HISTORIES
FOR AN INTRODUCTION TO HISTORIC LOS ANGELES, CLICK HERE
What could go wrong? One of the most intriguing L.A. architectural novelties we’ve ever seen was this take on the drive-in. It’s The Track, with “Motormat” technology, “Track” apparently a reference to racetrack—hence the striped service trolleys that were sent out to cars at 120 feet per minute, each unit named after a famous racehorse. A theme, however, was not enough in the face of Rube Goldberg technology. You just know the crazy trolley system must have hit snags constantly, with burgers and fries and chicken wings and cokes flying all over the hoods of Hudsons and DeSotos…and yet at one time there seems to have been as many as three outlets in the Los Angeles area, for however long they lasted. Here’s a description of the operation from The American Drive-In, by Michael Karl Witzel:

“Debuted in 1949, a Los Angeles innovation promised total elimination of carhops. At a new drive-in called “The Track,” it attracted customers from as far as Santa Monica with its unique type of service. Like a group of horses at a trough [there’s a gracious image], cars ringed around a central building, forming a circular pattern. Twenty semicircular parking spaces bridged a center kitchen by means of metal tracks. Food and condiments rode the rails within carrying…compartment[s] each powered by a small ½-horsepower motor…. The mechanical setup was reminiscent of the wackiest Rube Goldberg device. Positioned in a pre-determined [?] parking space, the diner rolled down the car window and was greeted by a stainless-steel bin that could be made flush with the door. Inside the box were plastic cups, a water bottle, menu, order pad, and change tray. It was large, too. Food for six people could be ferried back and forth on the elevated platforms. Patrons would jot down their orders and with the push of a button, the unit scooted a return to the kitchen…. When the empty bin arrived at the kitchen, an attendant put through the order and added up the bill. As hamburgers and other entrées were prepared, the rail box made its second journey to the automobile to collect the money. By the time it returned to the preparation area, the food was ready to go—loaded into the compartment along with condiments and the customer’s change. According to inventor Kenneth C. Purdy, the spoke-and-wheel-track arrangement sped service 20-25 percent.”

Well, needless to say, we wanted to know where this madcap drive-in was. There was a 1951 phone-book listing for a “The Track No 3” at 3816 Sepulveda Boulevard in Culver City, now the site of a Carl Jr’s, but current visual cues there don’t jive with the vintage shots seen here. So we squinted at the pics, especially the one at top, and decided that the sign on the Herman-Something real estate office must have said “Herman Shrager”—who, it turns out, dealt in cemetery real estate, as in plots. Anyway, after more digging we found that Herman had an office at 8152 Beverly Boulevard…and eureka! It all fell into place. Across from Herman’s one-time haunt, at the northwest corner of Beverly and Kilkea Drive, the distinctive Welch’s Candy building still stands…and so across Kilkea from Welch’s would have been The Track, at 8123 Beverly. The mini-chain’s other locations may have survived longer, but with maintenance obviously a nightmare and profits hindered with what was clearly too much real estate given over to servicing too few cars, it was all over in a few years. Advertisements for an auction of the pieces of The Track appeared in the Times in February 1952.

The view from the kitchen, above. Below:
Assuming that the contraption made it out to his car,
the driver received his order in this box:

As seen in the Los Angeles Times on February 17, 1952
 Looking north today at Beverly Boulevard and Kilkea Drive
Categories
All About Guns Gun Info for Rookies

Brownells AR-15/M-16 Magazine Maintenance

Categories
The Green Machine

Just another reason why I am so Happy that I did not go to John Wayne High School!!

https://youtu.be/5EQp4r3I6iI

Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Canada imposes import ban on handguns By Cam Edwards

(AP Photo/AJ Mast, File)
Back in May, the Trudeau administration announced support for a bill that would halt the legal sale, purchase, and transfer of all handguns in Canada and allow for municipalities to ban the possession of pistols outright. In the months since sales of handguns have surged across the country; a development that should surprise no one. If people are told they won’t soon be allowed to buy something, that tends to increase their desire to get it before it goes away. This particular “limited time offer,” however, has not only prompted thousands of Canadians to purchase a handgun for the very first time, it’s led to the Canadian government to up its anti-gun stance by banning outright the importation of pistols into the country.

Such guns “have one purpose and one purpose only and that is to kill people,” Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino told a press briefing announcing the move.

Global Affairs Canada added in a statement that the ban for businesses and individuals was a temporary measure, set to “last until the national freeze comes into force,” which is expected to happen by the fall.

The announcement was welcomed by arms control group PolySeSouvient, which called it an “important and innovative measure that will undoubtedly slow the expansion of the Canadian handgun market pending the passage” of the handgun freeze.

Experts remain skeptical about the effectiveness of gun control measures taken by Ottawa, pointing to the smuggling of guns from the neighbouring United States as the real problem.

On Wednesday, the Canada Border Services Agency announced two major seizures in western Canada of “ghost guns,” which have no serial numbers and are difficult to trace.

Just like with gun control laws here in the United States, criminals are going to shrug off Trudeau’s backdoor gun ban because they’re not getting their guns through legal means in the first place.

Unlike the United States, however, there is no right to keep and bear arms in Canadian law, at least according to the country’s highest court.

“Canadians, unlike Americans, do not have a constitutional right to bear arms,” the high court stated in 1993, in a decision over the possession of convertible semi-automatic weapons.

“Indeed, most Canadians prefer the peace of mind and sense of security derived from the knowledge that the possession of automatic weapons is prohibited,” said the court.

The rights issue was tested again in the case of an Ontario firearms dealer and manufacturer.

Bruce Montague was charged with several weapons offences after police found more than 200 firearms and 20,000 rounds of ammunition at Montague’s home in northwestern Ontario.

Montague didn’t renew the registrations on his weapons, convinced that he had a constitutional right to bear arms without government interference or regulation, despite the passage of Bill C-68, the Firearms Act, in 1995.

Montague argued that he had “a constitutional right to possess firearms for self defence” derived from the constitution of Britain.

He pointed to the preamble of the Constitution Act, 1867, Canada’s founding constitutional document, which in his view imported the English Bill of Rights of 1689, which states in Article 7: “That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.”

Montague further argued that in 1982, this historical right was shielded from any ordinary legislation by section 26 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which reads: “The guarantee in this Charter of certain rights and freedoms shall not be construed as denying the existence of any other rights or freedoms that exist in Canada.”

His convictions were upheld in the Ontario Court of Appeal and in September 2010, the Supreme Court of Canada refused to hear a final appeal, without offering reasons.

We may see a lawsuit filed by one or more gun shop owner over the import ban, but I think any litigation hoping to undo the move is unfortunately going to face long odds in court.

I also doubt that Trudeau is going to stop here. When (not if) this ban fails to stop violent criminals from illegally using guns in violent crimes it’s likely that the prime minister will finally adopt what gun control activists in Canada have been calling for all along: an outright ban on the possession of all handguns. The Trudeau administration is already moving ahead with its compensated confiscation of so-called assault weapons, and Canadian gun owners are right to be concerned about a similar push to confiscate handguns from law-abiding citizens in the not-too-distant future.