Categories
All About Guns

Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon: The Machine Gun Approaches By Kurt Allemeier

Benjamin Berkeley Hotchkiss was born in 1826 to a family of inventors in Connecticut, the hotbed of gun creation in the 19th century. The family had a business that manufactured many of their inventions, including an early variation of a monkey wrench.

Early in his career Hotchkiss worked as a gun maker for Colt and Winchester. He patented a cannon shell for rifled cannons. More of his shells were used for rifled cannons during the American Civil War than from any other munitions maker.

The main heavy machine gun used by the French Army in World War I bore his name, but before the machine gun was the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon. A 37 mm gun with five barrels, a Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon will be available in Rock Island Auction Company’s Feb. 14-17 Sporting & Collector Auction.

Hotchkiss-Revolving-Cannon-facing-rightThis late prototype of the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon will be available in Rock Island Auction Company’s Feb. 14-17 Sporting & Collector Auction.

Machine Guns Predecessors

A rapid-fire gun was long a dream of military leaders.

The Puckle gun, designed and patented in 1718 by London attorney James Puckle, is considered one of the earliest predecessors of the machine gun. Designed for naval defense against smaller, faster ships, the Puckle gun was a single barrel flintlock with a revolving cylinder that could fire off a whopping nine shots per minute before swapping out the cylinder for a freshly loaded one. In military tests it was found to be unreliable.

Other guns, like the Chambers Flintlock, came and went until the Gatling gun of 1862 arrived, firing from 200 rounds per minute to as many as 1,200 rounds per minute as improvements were made.

Colt-1874-Gatling-auc-78-lot-3134This U.S. Army Colt Model 1874 Gatling gun realized $149,500 in Rock Island Auction Company’s December 2019 Premier Auction.

Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon

After the Civil War, the U.S. Government wasn’t interested in new munitions, so Hotchkiss went to Europe where it seemed in a perpetual state of war. He established a factory in France on the eve of the Franco-Prussian War in 1870 where he made metallic cartridges for small arms. It was here that the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon was born.

Hotchkiss saw shortcomings in the Reffye Mitrailleuse, the French volley gun that fired ammunition from a 25-cartridge magazine in separate barrels within a cannon sleeve. He saw the French weapon had a fragile firing mechanism and a narrow cone of fire.

Since it also has a crank handle, the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon is often compared to the Gatling gun but has a number of differences. The most starkly obvious difference was the size of the rounds. The Gatling gun fired small firearm rounds but the Hotchkiss fired a 37 mm round. The St. Petersburg agreement of 1868 forbid exploding ammunition that weighed less than 14 oz., but the Hotchkiss projectile weighed 16 oz.

Hotchkiss-Revolving-Cannon-facing-leftThis late prototype Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon will be available in Rock Island Auction Company’s Feb. 14-17 Sporting & Collector Auction.

The Gatling gun had a bolt for each barrel, but the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon had an immovable breech block with a bolt. One rotation of the crank handle was a firing cycle for the revolving cannon that stops the barrel in place for firing accuracy.

The Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon used what one 1879 publication called 10-round “feed cases” to load cartridges into the gun. With an assistant gunner to load ammunition, it could fire about 60-80 rounds per minute out to a range of about 4,000 meters. The gun offered no recoil so one gunner could fire it with accuracy if it was suitably mounted.

Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon Trials

The gun was produced too late for use in the Franco-Prussian War but faced trials by the French Ministry of Marine as a maritime weapon. As a naval gun, the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon could fire about 15 shots a minute aimed at a fast-moving target, like a torpedo boat.

During testing, 1,136 rounds were fired with only five malfunctions. The gun destroyed a boat during trials, hitting the ship 70 times out of 119 shots aimed at it.

As a field gun, the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon was considered as an anti-personnel weapon because the shells weren’t very powerful. Firing canister shot could spray 7,000 balls per minute with an effective range of 2,000 yards. It was also considered for use arming railway cars guarded by steel shields to protect from small arms fire.

Hotchkiss-auc-82-lot-119This U.S. Navy Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon offered in Rock Island Auction Company’s May 2021 Premier Auction realized $149,500.

The naval model revolving cannon was adopted by the French Navy in 1877. By 1880, the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon was adopted for naval use by Brazil, China, France, Holland, Greece, the United States, Chile, Argentina, Russia, and Denmark.

However, its time was short as a naval weapon as torpedo boats grew larger and were better protected. The Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon was also made in 47 mm and 53 mm sizes, but the multi-barrel guns increased in weight and could no longer be mounted aboard ships where they were most effective. The revolving cannon was out of vogue by the early 1890s with the advent of the machine gun.

Hotchkiss-and-drawing-of-naval-gunBenjamin Berkeley Hotchkiss is seen at right, next to a drawing of a naval Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon.

Hotchkiss Machine Gun

Benjamin B. Hotchkiss began working on an automatic machine gun to compete with the Maxim that came out in 1884.  Designed in England by Hiram Maxim, his machine gun was used by every major power. Hotchkiss never got to see a working machine gun from his company. He died in 1885 before a design could be developed.

Before the turn of the century, Hotchkiss’s company eventually developed the Model 1897 that went through three variations before becoming the Model 1914. The era of automatic weapons had begun. In World War 1, the Germans fought with the MG 8 that was a version of the Maxim machine gun, while the British used the Vickers machine gun, also based on Maxim’s weapon.

The French Army used the Hotchkiss Model 1914 machine gun starting in the second half of World War 1 and continued to use it through World War 2. The Model 1914 was a sturdy, air-cooled weapon that was one of a number of modifications made to the Hotchkiss Model 1897. When the United States joined in World War 1, it was underprepared so relied on France for automatic weapons so the American Expeditionary Force used the Hotchkiss Model 1914 and Savage-made Vickers.

Legendary gun maker John Moses Browning would soon provide a machine gun for the U.S. military but production couldn’t ramp up fast enough to get his M1917 in the war until late 1918. His Browning Automatic Rifle, or BAR, was also adopted by the United States as a light machine gun and was in the hands of doughboys by the end of the war.

Hotchkiss-M1914-Auc-82-lot-491This Hotchkiss M1914 machine gun achieved $11,500 in Rock Island Auction Company’s May 2021 Premier Auction.

Hotchkiss Revolving Rifle Available

This particular Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon looks more like a Gatling gun, with its nine smaller caliber barrels as opposed to the five 37 mm barrels on the U.S. Navy Hotchkiss shown earlier. However, a peek inside the receiver shows a single bolt, rather than the multiple bolts inside the Gatling. This unmarked prototype is chambered to fire .6335 caliber ammunition (approximately 16 mm), and is likely from the turn of the 20th century. A Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms letter that accompanies the gun concludes that the receiver is similar to to the original design of the Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon and the the barrels are chambered for a one-of-a-kind black powder cartridge that is no longer manufactured in the United States.  In scouring our library, we were unable to find any similarly chambered Hotchkiss cannons, leaving an air of mystery around this model.

While Benjamin B. Hotchkiss may not land among the great gun inventors like Browning, Samuel Colt, or Daniel Wesson, his vision of the revolving cannon helped bridge early attempts at automatic weapons to the machine guns used in World War 1. This piece of history is part of the evolution of full auto guns born out of 19th century European land wars.

Sources:

Roads to the Great War

The Strange Early History of American Machine Guns: Hotchkiss Browning, by Gene Fax The Artilleryman Magazine

Forgotten Weapons

“The Hotchkiss Revolving Cannon” by Alfred Koerner, published in 1879

Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

My Great Wife is looking at me for some strange reason with a gleam in her eyes!

May be an image of text that says 'I made a huge to do list today... just can't figure out who's going to do it.'

Categories
All About Guns

Zastava M12 “Black Spear” .50 Cal Sniper Rifle

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Cops You have to be kidding, right!?!

VIDEO: ATF Agents Going Door-to-Door to Confiscate FRTs… ‘We have to Pick ‘Em Up’ by S.H. BLANNELBERRY

 

A video posted to Twitter this week by Mr.GunsNGear shows government agents making the rounds to confiscate forced reset triggers.

One of the individuals who was targeted recorded his interaction with the agents. It wasn’t immediately clear when the video was taken.

“So, the reason why we’re here is, as I’m sure you’re aware, the ATF recently classified FRTs — the forced reset triggers — as machineguns,” says the female agent.

“We are aware that you may have purchased some of these FRTs,” she continues. “So now basically the whole agency is reaching out to these purchasers and we have to pick ’em up. You know they’re evil.”

The citizen responds by saying he won’t be answering any questions regarding their inquiry nor will he be turning anything over.

“Are you refusing to give us the triggers,” asks the male agent.

“I’m not refusing anything and I won’t be answering any questions,” the citizen says.

“Again, we are aware that you did purchase FRTs,” says the female agent. “You wouldn’t be in trouble if you gave those up to us. Or, if you sold them, you can tell me you sold them.”

The citizen holds firm in his stance. He tells them that if he’s not being detained or if he’s not being placed under arrest he is going to leave.

“Just to be clear, so that now you know, that if you were to be in possession of these FRTs then you would be basically breaking the law,” she says.

In the United States, the possession of an unregistered machine gun is a federal offense under the National Firearms Act (NFA) of 1934 and the Gun Control Act of 1968. Penalties for violating these laws are no joke.

For possession of an unregistered machine gun, the potential penalties include:

  1. Imprisonment: Convicted individuals can face up to 10 years in federal prison.
  2. Fines: Fines for possessing an unregistered machine gun can be substantial, with amounts up to $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for organizations.
  3. Forfeiture: Any machine guns and other firearms involved in the offense, as well as any property used to commit the crime or traceable to the crime, may be subject to seizure and forfeiture.
  4. Loss of gun rights: Convicted individuals may lose their right to own or possess firearms in the future.

Remember, not only are FRTs considered “machineguns,” but bump stocks fall under that classification as well.

It appears that Biden’s ATF is playing hardball. Sending agents door-to-door to confiscate forced reset triggers from law-abiding citizens is tantamount to declaring war on 2A advocates, not to mention a terrible use of limited government resources.

Seriously, there are hardened criminals terrorizing communities all across the country. Yet, the president believes the best use of ATF’s personnel is to send them out to seize aftermarket triggers from responsible gun owners and enthusiasts.

It’s insanity. Or, maybe, Mr.GunsNGear is right. It’s tyranny.

Update 5/10/22 — ATF Responds

GunsAmerica reached out to ATF to ask the following questions:

Is the ATF still actively doing this? How did it obtain the list of purchasers of FRTs? Also, does it plan to take a similar approach with respect to bump stocks, pistol braces, and/or unserialized frames and receivers?

Erik Longnecker, ATF’s Deputy Chief of the Public Affairs Division responded in the following manner:

We would direct you to this Open Letter in reference to certain unregistered machineguns: https://www.atf.gov/firearms/docs/open-letter/all-ffls-mar-2022-open-letter-forced-reset-triggers-frts/download.

Additional information about bump stocks, short barreled rifles and firearm frames and receivers can be found on our website at: https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/rulings.

Categories
All About Guns

Colt 45: Three Generations of Davy Colts

Categories
Uncategorized

I ccould see my son Willie doing that!

May be a doodle of text that says 'DON'T WANT YOU BRINGING THAT SWORD AROUND THE KIDS. ಶಠ 음 RELAX, IT'S NOT A REAL SWORD. BANG! BANG! BANG! SECRET GUN! SECRET GUN! SECRET GUN!'

Categories
Allies Gear & Stuff

The Old and the Bold: Toggle Rope

Categories
Uncategorized

A Mauser M98 Standard Expert in caliber 9.3×62

Yep at $14,000 plus tax etc. & the cheapest ammo for it is over $2 per pop. So now my lovely wife now knows why I buy a lottery ticket one in a while! Grumpy

Categories
All About Guns

The One That Got Away

Categories
Hard Nosed Folks Both Good & Bad I am so grateful!! Leadership of the highest kind Manly Stuff One Hell of a Good Fight Our Great Kids Real men Soldiering This great Nation & Its People War

What a stud!! He is a classic example of a real hard nosed American Soldier, who was let down by the system!

The Navy SEAL Who Went to Ukraine Because He Couldn’t Stop Fighting

Daniel Swift was in his element waging America’s war on terror from Afghanistan to Yemen. After his marriage failed back home, he found a new purpose: killing Russians.

by By Ian Lovett and Brett Forrest

Daniel Swift’s nerves were shot. By the start of 2019, his Navy SEAL colleagues said, he was hardly eating or sleeping.

He had separated from his wife. A court had barred him from seeing his four children, and he was facing legal charges for false imprisonment and domestic battery.

Mr. Swift told fellow SEALs in San Diego, where he was based, that he was planning to go to Africa to fight wildlife poachers. They brushed off the comment, convinced that Mr. Swift, a soldier’s soldier, would never abandon his post.

A week later, he disappeared. Navy investigators searched for him, but Mr. Swift was always a step ahead.

He resurfaced in March of last year when he slipped into a group messaging chat of current and former SEALs. He was now fighting Russians in Ukraine, he texted. He petitioned the group for supplies, and later invited members to join him on the front lines. None did. Some advised him to come home. Others marveled as word of his exploits spread.

Mr. Swift was among thousands of young men who flooded to Kyiv from the West, including American veterans of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Many said they were drawn to the cause of a democratic country resisting a larger autocratic one.

But there was another side to Mr. Swift’s quest, as revealed in interviews with his colleagues and a memoir he published online under a pseudonym. Mr. Swift was part of a large group who spent years fighting America’s war on terror and have struggled to settle back into civilian life.

The military has acknowledged the impact on servicemembers and their families, particularly special forces, who suffered the outsized casualties during the later years of the U.S. war in Afghanistan.

Long deployments have pushed up divorce rates, while suicides among special forces spiked to the highest in the military. The government has launched programs to help lessen the psychological burden on spouses as well as troops.

Daniel Glenn, a psychologist who works with veterans at the University of California, Los Angeles, said many tell him that the U.S. military does a great job preparing them to go to war, but not to return from it.

“They’ve been in some of the most intense, dangerous, awful situations. They’re really good at that,” he said. “Comparatively, back in the civilian world, everything feels mundane. It’s hard to have anything that feels like a rush or makes you feel alive.”

Daniel Swift serving in Severodonetsk, Ukraine.

Many of the men who fought with Mr. Swift said this feeling was part of what drew them to Ukraine.

“A lot of people won’t admit it, but lots of people are here because war is fun,” said a 43-year-old U.S. Army veteran. Civilian life, he added, didn’t offer the same camaraderie or sense of purpose: “War is easy in many ways. Your mission is crystal clear. You’re here to take the enemy out.”

‘Viet Dan’

Mr. Swift had wanted to be a Navy SEAL since childhood. After graduating from high school in rural Oregon in 2005, he married his high-school sweetheart and enlisted in the Navy.

Two years later, he enrolled in the SEALs selection program, a grueling process highlighted by “Hell Week,” when candidates train physically for more than 20 hours a day, run more than 200 miles and sleep for about four hours total.

The vast majority of candidates wash out. Mr. Swift, just 20 years old, made it. Soon after, his wife gave birth to their first child.

A teetotaler, Mr. Swift sometimes drove fellow SEALs on bar crawls, though he often stayed in and studied tactics in military manuals.

On deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan, he won a reputation for dependability, a rare Legion of Merit award and a nickname, “Viet Dan,” inspired by his fondness for action.

“Tough kid, humble, quiet, and a little bit crazy,” said a SEAL who was the third in command of Mr. Swift’s first platoon.

In 2013, when his wife was pregnant with their fourth child, Mr. Swift decided to quit. “I thought maybe God was trying to tell me to settle down and be a family man,” he wrote in his memoir, which he self-published in 2020.

He joined the Washington state police and reveled in time off with his kids, exploring logging roads through the woods, cooking hot dogs and shooting guns.

The new job didn’t suit him, though. Police officers were rewarded for giving out tickets rather than helping people, he wrote in his book. Sitting in his cruiser scanning for speeders, Mr. Swift texted friends in the SEALs and told them he missed life among them, according to Navy comrades.

In 2015, a friend from the SEALs died, and Mr. Swift decided to re-enlist as a fight with Islamic State beckoned. “I wanted my piece of the pie,” he wrote.

In Iraq again, Mr. Swift took on Islamic State militants in city streets. Later, he deployed to Yemen.

Navy SEAL candidates train during ‘Hell Week.’ PHOTO: PETTY OFFICER 1ST CLASS ABE MCNATT/U.S. NAVY

Most candidates wash out of the SEALs selection program. PHOTO: PETTY OFFICER 1ST CLASS ABE MCNATT/U.S. NAVY

The overseas missions took a toll on his marriage. In October 2018, shortly after Mr. Swift returned from seven months in Yemen, his relationship with his wife collapsed.

In court documents, Maegan Swift said he’d returned home angry, prone to yelling at her. He disputed this account in his book, but both agreed that one night when they were arguing at home, she threatened to call the police if he prevented her from leaving with the kids.

Mr. Swift went to the bedroom and returned with a pistol.

He said in the book that it was unloaded and that he told her: “See what happens when the cops try and take my children from me.”

Ms. Swift moved the children to her sister’s house while Mr. Swift was traveling. When he returned, a scuffle ensued as he tried to put his younger daughter in his car and Ms. Swift and her sister tried to stop him. Mr. Swift said he was fending off the women as they attacked him; they said he choked Ms. Swift’s sister. The police arrived and arrested him.

Ms. Swift declined to comment for this article.

A Navy psychologist said Mr. Swift had adjustment disorder, a term for difficulty re-entering civilian life, Mr. Swift wrote in his memoir. He dismissed the diagnosis.

Mr. Swift was charged in state court with false imprisonment, child endangerment and domestic battery, which threatened his military career. If convicted of a felony, Mr. Swift would lose his right to carry a gun, and this prospect shook him, according to SEALs who knew him. Being a warrior was nearly all he’d known.

Most of all, he worried about losing his kids, the oldest of whom was  the oldest of whom was 11.

Mr. Swift wrote that while the U.S. government has helped veterans cope with war trauma, “what we don’t seem to care about is when they return home to things they’ve been fighting for, only to have them ripped away.”

“I have been face to face with death multiple times, and it has never been more traumatic than having my children taken away,” he wrote.

In the early months of 2019, Mr. Swift disappeared. His passport pinged at immigration control in Mexico, then in Germany, a former SEAL colleague said.

Mr. Swift tried to join the French Foreign Legion, according to another SEAL colleague, but was rejected because the recruiters worried his kids could be a distraction. He ended up in Thailand where he fought kickboxing matches and taught English.

He wrote his memoir, he said, to explain himself to his children. “If you ever want to talk to me just make a Facebook page,” he wrote, addressing his kids. “I look.”

He titled the book “The Fall of a Man.”

No retreat

After Russia invaded Ukraine in February of last year, news reports of the war’s child victims reminded Mr. Swift of his own children and stirred him to action, he later told friends.

He entered Ukraine in early March and joined a platoon running missions behind enemy lines near Kyiv, according to soldiers who fought with him there.

During his first operations, he taped body armor to his chest under a white Fruit of the Loom T-shirt because he arrived without a vest to hold bulletproof plates. His teammates called it the “Dan special.”

Conducting reconnaissance and hunting armored vehicles with a Javelin antitank missile, he soon developed a reputation as highly skilled, methodical and most comfortable in the middle of a firefight, according to men who fought with him.

Adam Thiemann, a former U.S. Army Ranger, recalled one mission, where he and Mr. Swift set off with five others to ambush a Russian barrack. Outside the compound, they surprised a handful of uniformed Russian soldiers and quickly killed them. The Ukrainian commander ordered a retreat. Mr. Swift, who’d been quiet up to that point, was incredulous.

“Retreat?” Mr. Swift said, according to Mr. Thiemann and another team member. “We didn’t even get shot at.”

When Russian troops pulled back from Kyiv at the end of March, many foreign fighters went home, feeling they’d helped fend off the existential threat to Ukraine. Mr. Swift stayed.

His foreign legion team—a unit of Ukraine’s military intelligence, made up of about 20 foreigners and a Ukrainian commander—was dispatched to the city of Mykolaiv in the country’s south.

There, Mr. Swift led the squad on aquatic missions, often using inflatable boats to travel across open sea at night to target Russian positions, according to several soldiers in his unit.

During down time, teammates said, he was quiet and uncommonly disciplined. He didn’t drink or smoke, and worked out obsessively. Even near the front, he’d go out for long solo runs.

Men fighting with Mr. Swift in Ukraine said he would accompany them for shawarma in Mykolaiv, walking around shirtless in jeans and sandals and getting waitresses’ phone numbers. In photos, he rarely smiled; he was more likely to crack a joke during missions, they said.

He told only a few comrades about his life outside the military.

One teammate, a 29-year-old American who goes by the call sign Tex, said Mr. Swift confided in him about his troubles at home.

“He loved his kids,” Tex said. “A lot of things didn’t bother Dan. But the thought of his kids maybe being told who he was and not actually knowing him, that worried him.”

Ukrainian soldiers in the eastern city of Bakhmut in January. PHOTO: EMANUELE SATOLLI FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

In early June, the team headed to the eastern city of Severodonetsk, which the Russians were flattening with artillery.

The group had earned a reputation for taking on missions that others turned down. As the situation in Severodonetsk grew worse, Mr. Swift joked that if they were surrounded, at least they could shoot in every direction.

On its last trip into the city, the team tried to hit a building where they believed about 10 Russians were hiding. As soon as they fired the first rocket, however, they found themselves under heavy assault. Dozens of Russians were in the building. Mr. Swift ended up trapped in a corner, trading machine-gun fire with a Russian.

The legion team’s Ukrainian commander, Oleksiy Chubashev, was shot through the neck.

With a Russian tank approaching, Mr. Swift laid down covering fire to free a group of pinned-down comrades, who put Capt. Chubashev on a stretcher and carried him out the back of the building.

Mr. Swift joined them outside to help carry the stretcher. A video seen by The Wall Street Journal shows them hauling the body through the city in daylight, without cover, while artillery shells whistle and crash around them.

After about a half a mile in the June heat, an exhausted young soldier dropped his corner of the stretcher.

“Dan just tore into him,” a member of the team from Minnesota recalled. “He never yells. But he screamed, like, ‘What are you saving your energy for?’ ”

Capt. Chubashev died before making it back to base.

The next morning, Mr. Swift sat down beside several teammates who were drinking coffee. He said he was thinking about calling his children.

The men were shocked. They didn’t know he had kids.

Soon after, Ukrainian forces started to retreat from Severodonetsk. Several of the men on Mr. Swift’s team decided they’d had enough. They went home.

‘I’ll walk out’

Mr. Swift, by contrast, began setting up for life in Ukraine. He was looking for an apartment in Kyiv and sorted out a Ukrainian visa for a Thai woman he’d met when he was living there. He spoke of establishing an academy in Ukraine after the war to teach military tactics.

He returned to Mykolaiv, where he again led aquatic missions into Russian-held territory.

In August, Mr. Swift led an attack on a Russian-held village across the Inhulets River. Working with Ukrainian special forces, the team forced the Russians to retreat, calling in a strike on a house full of enemy soldiers and taking seven prisoners.

But they ended up sheltering in a basement under Russian artillery fire. Mr. Swift called the unit’s new Ukrainian commander, asking to pull back, according to team members. The commander said no.

Mr. Swift pulled the team out anyway. In the middle of the night, he and the team medic swam upriver to retrieve a half-inflated boat to bring their comrades and gear back across to Ukrainian-held territory. When they got back to the base, Mr. Swift quit and moved to another foreign legion team.

A spokesman for Ukraine’s foreign legion declined to comment.

By the new year, Ukraine’s hold on Bakhmut, in the eastern Donetsk region, was tenuous. Mr. Swift’s unit, dispatched there, found Ukrainian troops scattered in basements around the city sheltering from withering Russian artillery fire.

“I’m just here in the basement,” Mr. Swift said in a phone call with a former Green Beret, who’d fought with him earlier in the war. “Trying to plan missions that are not going to get us killed.”

Mr. Swift was scheduled to leave Bakhmut later in January and planned to meet the Thai woman in Romania and bring her to Kyiv.

On the night of Jan. 17, Mr. Swift led a small team of Western fighters into a cluster of homes and began clearing them of fighters from the Russian paramilitary group Wagner, according to Mr. Swift’s unit commander. As Mr. Swift led his squad between buildings, a Russian soldier fired a rocket-propelled grenade.

A projectile, either shrapnel or a bullet, penetrated Mr. Swift’s helmet and lodged in his brain.

His commander found Mr. Swift lying prone, yet coherent. As the unit hurried to evacuate, Mr. Swift fought to remain lucid and asked for help getting to his feet. “I’ll walk out,” he said.

He lost consciousness and died three days later at a trauma center in Dnipro, a nearby regional capital. He was 35 years old.

A memorial service for Daniel Swift in Lviv, Ukraine. PHOTO: STANISLAV IVANOV/GLOBAL IMAGES UKRAINE/GETTY IMAGES

Mr. Swift died while still a SEAL, though AWOL, in a war to which the U.S. hasn’t committed troops. This has complicated his family’s effort to collect benefits from Washington.

A Navy spokesman said Mr. Swift was considered to be an active deserter at the time of his death, and that “we cannot speculate as to why the former Sailor was in Ukraine.” The Pentagon has yet to make a ruling on the family’s petition.

On Feb. 11, several SEALs attended Mr. Swift’s funeral in Oregon. In a video viewed by the Journal, one by one they punched metal SEAL pins into the surface of his casket, a SEAL ritual to the fallen.

Nikita Nikolaienko contributed to this article.