Categories
War

Ukraine in maps: Tracking the war with Russia By the Visual Journalism Team BBC News

It is almost two years since Russia’s invasion but the situation on the ground has changed little in recent months – despite Ukraine’s counter-offensive, which began in June.

Here are the latest developments:

  • Ukrainian forces have continued ground operations on the eastern bank of the Dnipro River – a foothold that could allow it to transfer vital equipment across the river
  • Russian forces in the east have made confirmed advances north east of Kupiansk, north of Bakhmut, and south west of Avdiivka
  • Russian forces have also advanced near Robotyne, a southern village that was retaken by Ukraine early in its counter-offensive
line

Ukraine maintains foothold across river

Ukraine has continued ground operations on the eastern bank of the Dnipro River with heavy battles reported to be ongoing in the area around the village of Krynky, about 30km (19 miles) from the city of Kherson.

Map highlighting where Ukrainian and Russian forces are around Krynky and Kherson

Ukraine first announced it had made a breakthrough in mid-November – the river had separated Ukrainian and Russian forces since Moscow’s troops withdrew from Kherson a year ago.

Analysts at the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW) say Ukrainian forces have retained their positions despite Russian counterattacks.

If Ukraine can continue to hold the area it could be a significant advance as it may be able to begin transferring armoured vehicles and air defence systems across the river, putting it a step closer to breaking through to Crimea, the peninsula illegally annexed by Russia in 2014.

The village of Robotyne in the Zaporizhzhia region could offer a similar stepping stone but Russian forces are reported to have made some advances in the area.

When Ukraine retook Robotyne in August it was hoped that its forces would be able to cut the land corridor to Crimea, making Moscow’s supply lines more complicated.

The ISW does note that Russia’s advances might be the result of Ukrainian forces withdrawing to “more defensible positions” near Robotyne.

Russian advances in the east

Russia has also made advances north east of Kupiansk, north of Bakhmut, and south west of Avdiivka, according to the latest ISW assessment.

Map showing position of Russian troops on the eastern front of Ukraine, highlighting the positions of Kupiansk, Bakhmut and Avdiivka

Perhaps most significant is the activity around Avdiivka, a strategically important town on the front line in eastern Ukraine.

The town is sometimes described as the gateway to the city of Donetsk, which has been occupied by Russia and its proxy forces since 2014. Taking Avdiivka – which lies close by – would allow Russia to push the front line back, making it harder for the Ukrainian forces to retake the territory.

The Ukrainian General Staff says its forces have repelled Russian attacks near Avdiivka itself, as well as from settlements to the north west, south west, and directly west of the town.

However, the ISW says Russia has made confirmed advances near the town and notes that several Russian sources claim its forces are trying to push Ukrainian troops out of positions in the Avdiivka Coke Plant, which occupies a key tactical position.

Map showing Russian and Ukrainian positions around Avdiivka and highlighting the coke plant

The plant, on the north-western outskirts of the town, dominates the main road into Avdiivka and, the UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) believes if Russian forces were to secure it, resupplying the town would “become increasingly difficult for Ukraine”.

It notes the building gives Ukraine a “localised defensive advantage” and says Russian forces will probably suffer significant losses if they attempt to assault the facility.

The battle for Bakhmut

The city of Bakhmut, which has endured some of the heaviest fighting of the war, has been under Russian control for several months and, although Ukraine gained some ground in the surrounding areas over the summer, the battles continue.

Recent assessments by the ISW show Russian forces have made advances north of Bakhmut.

Map showing positions of Russian and Ukrainian forces around Bakhmut

The Ukrainian General Staff says settlements in the area – including Klishchiivka and Andriivka – are continuing to come under artillery and mortar fire.

Despite Russia’s reported recent advances along the front line, UK MoD says the individual attacks are relatively small – “rarely above platoon size”, and adds: “A major Russian breakthrough is unlikely and overall, the front is characterised by stasis.”

More than a year of fighting

Russia’s invasion began with dozens of missile strikes on cities all over Ukraine before dawn on 24 February 2022.

Russian ground troops moved in quickly and within a few weeks were in control of large areas of Ukraine and had advanced to the suburbs of Kyiv.

Russian forces were bombarding Kharkiv, and they had taken territory in the east and south as far as Kherson, and surrounded the port city of Mariupol.

Four maps showing how the situation has changed on the ground since Russia's invasion.

But they hit very strong Ukrainian resistance almost everywhere and faced serious logistical problems with poorly motivated Russian troops suffering shortages of food, water and ammunition.

Ukrainian forces were also quick to deploy Western supplied arms such as the Nlaw anti-tank system, which proved highly effective against the Russian advance.

By October 2022, the picture had changed dramatically and having failed to take Kyiv, Russia withdrew completely from the north. Since then, little has changed on the ground.

By David Brown, Bella Hurrell, Dominic Bailey, Mike Hills, Lucy Rodgers, Paul Sargeant, Alison Trowsdale, Tural Ahmedzade, Chris Clayton, Kady Wardell, Mark Bryson, Zoe Bartholomew, Sean Willmott, Sana Dionysiou, Joy Roxas, Gerry Fletcher, Jana Tauschinsk, Debie Loizou, Simon Martin and Prina Shah.

line

About these maps

To indicate which parts of Ukraine are under control by Russian troops we are using daily assessments published by the Institute for the Study of War with the American Enterprise Institute’s Critical Threats Project. To show key areas where advances are taking place we are also using updates from the UK Ministry of Defence and BBC research.

The situation in Ukraine is often fast moving and it is likely there will be times when there have been changes not reflected in the maps.

Categories
All About Guns Cops Well I thought it was funny!

And I was reloading when you showed up!

Categories
All About Guns Ammo

357 MAGNUM: History & Relevance

Categories
All About Guns

Arsenal Strike One: Russian Police Pistol Comes to the West

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Why The US Navy Wants BATTLESHIPS Again

Categories
All About Guns

Cannon Shooting Compilation: 20mm to 76mm

Categories
All About Guns

Why M855 Sucks!

Categories
Allies Well I thought it was funny! Well I thought it was neat!

Winston Churchill’s Greatest Insults And Jokes

Categories
All About Guns

Why was this the last Webley pistol? With firearms expert, Jonathan Ferguson.

Categories
All About Guns Ammo

The .300 Norma Magnum: History & Performance by DAVE CAMPBELL

300 Norma Magnum Lede

As the new millennium was coming, cartridge development centered around eliminating the belt that wraps around the base of the Holland & Holland magnum cartridges. The belt was found by some to be superfluous, and an increase of the diameter of the case allowed for more powder, which resulted in greater velocity. Remington was first out of the gate when it introduced the .300 Remington Ultra Mag (RUM). Based upon the .404 Jeffery case, the .300 RUM slightly exceeded velocity produced by the popular .300 Winchester Magnum (Win. Mag.), a .375 H&H Magnum (Mag.) derivative. Two years later, Winchester counterpunched with the .300 Winchester Short Magnum (WSM), giving shooters virtually identical performance in a shorter, lighter and stiffer receiver. The WSM cartridge is 0.75” shorter than the Remington offering and was immediately successful.

Meanwhile, the Swedish firm Norma Precision was looking to expand its cartridge lineup. Its .308 Norma Magnum (Mag.), developed in 1960 and based upon the .375 H&H Mag. case, by way of the .358 Norma Magnum (Mag.), had a following in the U.S. but was limited because few, if any, U.S. rifle manufacturers chambered their rifles in it. Schultz & Larson and Husqvarna chambered rifles for it, but if you wanted an American rifle in that chambering, it would have to have been a custom job. By 2009, long-range sniping was enjoying more popularity, and Norma decided to give itself a .33-cal. facelift.

cartridge comparsion two bullets vertical side by side .300 win mag left and 300 norma mag on right brass yellow white background

Long-range shooting competitor Jimmy Sloan designed a cartridge that would shoot the .338-cal., 300-grain Sierra MatchKing bullet in a Remington long-action receiver with the bullet seated out as far as possible so as to not impinge on powder capacity. His first efforts were based upon the .416 Rigby parent case, and later, he worked out an agreement with Norma to produce the .338 Norma Magnum (Mag.). The rifle/cartridge combo did well at long-range matches and became part of Norma’s commercial product line. It is similar to the .338 Lapua Magnum (Mag.), giving up some 120 f.p.s. to the Finnish round with a 300-grain bullet.

It was several years later, in 2012, Norma went to task modifying its .338-cal. cartridge. After necking it down to .30 cal., it was christened as the .300 Norma Magnum (Mag.) to differentiate it from its prior .308 Norma Magnum (Mag.). It launches a 230-grain Berger Hybrid bullet at 2,985 f.p.s. out of a 27″ barrel, with the bullet retaining supersonic velocities past 1,500 meters and more than 4,400 ft.-lbs. of energy, according to Norma. Accuracy is so good that the United States Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) adopted the cartridge for its Mk22 Mod 0 Advanced Sniper Rifle in 2017.

right side of barrett bolt-action rifle flat dark earth color with bipod

While the target and tactical successes of the .300 Norma Mag. garner most of the attention, a few stalwart souls have been using the cartridge in the hunting fields. A very good friend of mine is so impressed with the cartridge, he has bought two rifles chambered for it. One is the Barrett MRAD pictured here; the other is a Blaser R8. He has hunted with both rifles, taking several elk and deer with the Blaser and an Alaskan moose, mountain goat and a wolverine with the Barrett.

One of the elk was taken at a measured 500 yards. Here is his account, “[The] bull was exactly 500 yards facing me, quartering to my left. [One] shot entered just behind his left shoulder, taking out one lung, exited last rib and destroying liver. The bull did not take a step, fell over shook his head one time and expired. No bullet recovery, complete pass through.”

Norma 217 smokeless powder can jug jar red label black bottle gunpowder reloading ammunition

My friend is a superb and well-disciplined rifleman and carries the latest rangefinding and ballistic calculators with him when afield. He has taken several pronghorn from 150 to 450 yards with the .300 Norma Mag. He limits his shots on game animals to 500 yards, though he can ring steel considerably further than 1,500 yards. No animal, save one elk, required more than one shot. That single elk was hit in one lung at 300 yards and went down upon impact, though a moment later, it raised its head, signifying the need for one additional shot, which quickly finished the large-framed animal.

Norma MRP smokeless powder jug jar container black jug gunpowder red label red cap

Like its .30-cal. older sibling, the .308 Norma Mag., the .300 Norma Mag. hasn’t received mass attention from the general population of U.S. hunters and shooters. It gets more attention from the long-range crowd. However, reloaders are finding a lot to like about the cartridge. Much of its reputed accuracy comes from the Norma brass, which is very uniform. Case capacity is 103.0 grains of water.

As for gunpowder, Norma steers reloaders toward its own line of powders—no shocker—with MRP and Norma 217. Norma has data for bullets as light as the 150-grain Barnes TSX, starting with 86.6 grains of MRP at 3,343 f.p.s. and maxing out at 91.2 grains of MRP for 3,572 f.p.s. At the top end of bullet weights, 82.7 grains of Norma 217 will send that 230-grain Berger Hybrid out of the muzzle at 2,789 f.p.s., maxing out at 87.0 grains yielding 2,940 f.p.s. Most states require expanding bullets for hunting, and at these velocities strongly constructed bullets like Barnes TSX or Swift’s Scirocco II and A-Frame should be used. Softer cup-and-core bullets will almost always fragment excessively at these velocities.

Blaser R8 Professional black bolt-action hunting rifle with riflescope right-side view

The .300 Norma Mag. represents one of the latest efforts to explore the velocity spectrum’s upper threshold while maintaining a very high benchmark for accuracy. Experimenters will continually press the limits in that regard. While many magnum cartridges have fallen by the wayside, until something really different comes along, this one may be at the top of its class for a long time.