Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

EVOLUTION: DECADES OF DEER TAKE YOUR PICK WRITTEN BY DAVE ANDERSON

Rifles from the ’50s and ’60s (from left) — Winchester 94 .30-30, Lee Enfield
.303 British, Savage 99 .250 Kollmorgen 4x, Winchester 100 .308 Kollmorgen 2 3/4x,
Remington 760 .257 Roberts Weaver 2 1/2x, Winchester 70 .308 Kahle 4x.

 

Big game rifles have evolved continuously with the introduction of new models, new cartridges, new manufacturing methods, changing hunting conditions and methods.

I’ve illustrated some of the changes with hypothetical gun racks from deer camps beginning with the 1950s, both heavy cover whitetail hunting and open country mule deer and antelope hunting, as I did plenty of both.

1950s

 

The post-WWII era was a time of tremendous economic growth in the U.S. with a corresponding increase in hunting and shooting. Converting surplus military rifles for sporting use was a major business. Several cartridges were introduced. The big change in my view was the shift from iron sights to scopes. In 1950 it was unusual to see a hunting rifle with a scope. After the early ’60s it was safe to assume a rifle that could be scoped would be scoped.

1960s

 

The big change I saw in the 1960s was increased interest in Magnum cartridges in large part due to the brilliant and tireless efforts of Roy Weatherby. Whitetail hunters liked semiautos and pump actions and began finding scopes useful even on running game in wooded terrain.

The Remington 700 7mm Rem. Mag., usually fitted with a 3-9 Redfield, was the hot set-up of the era. Both rifle and cartridge were in such demand they were often hard to find for sale.

 

Dave’s first “modern” hunting rifle (above) following a Winchester 94 .30-30
and Lee-Enfield .303 British — an early ’70s era Winchester 70A in .270 Win.,
Weaver 1.5 – 4.5 scope. Remington pump rifles have been taking deer reliably for 70 years.

1970s

 

This decade saw manufacturers trying to respond to the demands of rifle enthusiasts for better quality control, improved fit and finish, cut instead of impressed checkering and in general, a more aesthetic and less utilitarian approach. Computer-assisted manufacturing was taking its first baby steps.

 

1980s

 

The rifle trend I remember most from the 1980s was the demand for “mountain rifles” though there were never a lot of mountain hunters. Major manufacturers came out with lightweight/featherweight models — actually not very light by today’s standards — while quality control, fit and finish continued to improve. “Standard” cartridges made a comeback and major manufacturers began offering synthetic stocks.

 

1990s

The biggest change I recall from the 1990s was the rapid acceptance of synthetic stocks and stainless steel components.

 

2000s

Laser rangefinders were being used by the military in the 1960s. In the 1990s small personal-use laser rangefinders were being used by golfers and rifle shooters and rapidly got more accurate, more user-friendly and more affordable. New cartridges appeared so quickly it seems some got dropped almost before the shooting world knew of them.

 

Left is a ’50s era model in .257 Roberts. At right, essentially the same
rifle but a .243 with synthetic stock from around 2015.

2010s

Through the 2000s rifles became more accurate and more consistently accurate. Much of the improvement came from greater manufacturing precision in rifle barrels and triggers. A major and often overlooked improvement resulted from the application of computer design to bullets. The ballistic efficiency of modern bullets is astonishing.

Categories
Soldiering Some Red Hot Gospel there! War

Why did the North Africa Campaign Matter in WW2?

Categories
All About Guns

A S&W K38 Target Masterpiece

Categories
All About Guns

Model 1863 Allin Converted Musket | Ordnance TSF: An Inside Look

Categories
All About Guns Ammo

Merkel 140 AE Double Rifle Review – .470 Nitro Express

Categories
Uncategorized

You forgot to call him sir!

Categories
All About Guns

A Winchester 1873 Exhibition Deluxe Special Order .44-40 – 1 of 1000 RARE

Categories
Born again Cynic! The Green Machine

Why am I not surprised by this? The Secret Payment by The American Experience

Macarthur-Secret-Payment-1905-LOC.jpg
General Douglas MacArthur, 1905. Library of Congress.

One of the most controversial moments in the controversial life of Douglas MacArthur came in early 1942, when he received $500,000 from the Philippine government during the siege of Corregidor and Bataan. This fact remained a secret until historian Carol Petillo broke the story in a 1979 article, and while some of the details may never be known, the incident has received well-deserved attention.

The roots of the story go back to 1935, when MacArthur accepted the offer of Philippine Commonwealth President Manuel Quezon to become his country’s top military advisor. Before he left, MacArthur convinced the War Department to make an exception to the rule forbidding U.S. officers from receiving compensation from the countries they advised. Quezon then promised MacArthur a bonus of 46/100 of 1 percent of Philippine defense spending up to 1942.

When MacArthur retired from the U.S. Army in 1937 (but remained as advisor in the Philippines), Chief of Staff Malin Craig suggested to Franklin Roosevelt that he renounce the exception, but the President declined to do so.

Fast forward to Corregidor, on a grim New Years Day, 1942. Army Chief of Staff George Marshall sends a cable making it depressingly clear that Washington would be able to do little for MacArthur’s beseiged forces and advising that Quezon leave Corregidor as soon as possible to set up a government in exile in the States.

Two days later, after discussing it with MacArthur and his cabinet, Quezon issued Executive Order # 1 of the Philippine Commonwealth, awarding MacArthur $500,000, with lesser amounts going to members of his staff. The grandly worded order called the payment “recompense and reward” for the “magnificent defense” engineered by MacArthur’s Mission, whose “record of services is interwoven forever into the national fate of our people.” MacArthur, feeling abandoned by Washington, surely welcomed both the words and the reward.

Quezon’s reasons for offering, and MacArthur’s reasons for accepting, the fruits of Executive Order #1 will always remain something of a mystery, but Carol Petillo offers a compelling explanation. Regarding Quezon’s offer, she cites the Filipino concept of “utang na loob,” a kind of reciprocal bond of obligation between family or close friends.

From his Asian/Filipino perspective, Quezon was cementing an already close bond that existed on two levels: on a personal level, between MacArthur and himself; and on a national level, between their two countries. Thus the money was both a reward for MacArthur’s past service to the Philippines and a further guarantee that MacArthur (and by extension the U.S.) would do everything in his power to help the Filipinos in the days ahead. MacArthur, having spent many years living in the Philippines, could easily have seen the situation the same way. Yet his acceptance of the gift is more problematic.

As MacArthur biographer Geoffrey Perret has demonstrated, the payment was almost surely legal. And it’s also true that given the dire situation on Corregidor, MacArthur might have assumed he’d never live to spend the money (although he had been informed as early as February 4, more than a week before the money was wired, that FDR was considering ordering him out).

Nevertheless, MacArthur would have known that for any American military officer to accept such a large amount of money from a foreign government would cast doubt on his motivations and actions, particularly in a time of war. Eisenhower seemed to understand this when Quezon offered him $60,000 later that year. He refused, later writing, “I explained that while I understood this to be unquestionably legal, and that the President’s motives were of the highest, the danger of misapprehension or misunderstanding on the part of some individual might operate to destroy whatever usefulness I might have to the allied cause in the present War.” MacArthur either failed to see or chose to ignore the fact that accepting such a gift compromised him, and left him open to accusations — true or not — of being bought off.

Perhaps the most telling proof comes from the general himself. MacArthur assiduously avoided mentioning the award, even in his “Reminiscences,” where he names practically every other award he ever received. Only because his aide Richard Sutherland left a copy of the order in his papers was Petillo able to break the story.

Categories
All About Guns

Colt Model 1877 DA Delicate flower or gunfighting tool

Categories
A Victory!

Could the NRA Become Relevant Again?