Categories
All About Guns

The Big Stick – Theodore Roosevelt’s Safari Rifle

Categories
Soldiering

Behind the scenes of the Coronation | British Army – Just like ours a VERY busy group of folks!

Categories
All About Guns

404 Jeffery CZ versus the Blaser R93 416 Remington Magnum Big Game Rifles

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Being a Stranger in a very Strange Land Born again Cynic! Gun Fearing Wussies You have to be kidding, right!?!

I see that ATF has some personnel problems

Categories
All About Guns

A Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel in 12 GA

Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 2

Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 1

Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 3
Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 4
Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 5
Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 6
Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 7
Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 8
Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 9
Berika Arms Model FLN, Lever Action, 4+1 Tube Fed, 18.5 Inch Barrel, Factory new in box. 12 GA - Picture 10

 

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" You have to be kidding, right!?!

Nope!

Categories
Real men This great Nation & Its People

I just found out that one of my Teacher Friends has died, So here is to you Don! You tried to do your best all the time

Categories
All About Guns

Dirty Harry’s Hogleg — S&W Model 29 .44 Magnum BY WILL DABBS

Smith and Wesson Model 29 .44 Magnum right profile

“I know what you’re thinking. ‘Did he fire six shots or only five?’ Well to tell you the truth, in all this excitement, I kind of lost track myself. But being that this is a .44 Magnum, the most powerful handgun in the world, and would blow your head clean off, you’ve gotta ask yourself one question: ‘Do I feel lucky?’ Well do ya, punk?”

Will Dabbs shooting the Smith and Wesson Model 29 revolver
If ever there was a firearm that should receive title billing in a movie, it was the Smith and Wesson Model 29 .44 Magnum used in Dirty Harry.

Words can be powerful. Nations go to war over words. People fall in love over the turn of a phrase. Words can be frivolous, powerful, dangerous or inane.

These particular words, likely penned by the legendary John Milius and spoken by Clint Eastwood in character as Dirty Harry Callahan, are some of the coolest ever captured on film.

But for a remarkable turn of fate, they could have been uttered very differently.

Dirty Harry defined Clint Eastwood’s career. Harry was originally supposed to be played by Frank Sinatra. The role was also offered to John Wayne, Burt Lancaster, Steve McQueen, George C. Scott, and Paul Newman.

They all passed on the project citing its excessive violence. It was on the strength of Newman’s recommendation that the producers offered the role to Eastwood.

If ever there was a firearm that should receive title billing in a movie, it was the Smith and Wesson Model 29 .44 Magnum used in Dirty Harry.

The synergistic combination of Eastwood’s inimitable presence and the Model 29’s unparalleled power created an enduring cinematic icon.

At a time when the Age of Aquarius threatened to castrate American virility, Dirty Harry gently reminded the world that we Americans were still the baddest boys on the block.

Smith and Wesson Model 29 with multiple boxes of ammunition and target
The Smith and Wesson Model 29 .44 Magnum is capable of fine combat accuracy.

Origin Story

Elmer Keith was the father of the .44 Magnum.

In the early 1950s, Elmer began experimenting with the .44 Special cartridge to produce something more powerful, and therefore better suited, for big-game hunting.

Once he devised the round, he approached Smith and Wesson and Remington about producing a gun to fire it.

The S&W Model 29 first drew breath on December 15, 1955, and was offered for retail sale a month later with an MSRP of $140. That’s about $1,280 today.

The S&W Model 29 evolved through 10 different sub-variants between the mid-1950s and the present.

The gun has always been popular, but the 1971 release of Dirty Harry made it difficult for dealers to keep them stocked.

While the pistol and cartridge have been subsequently eclipsed by such beasts as the .454 Casull and .500 S&W Magnum, in its day, the .44 Magnum was indeed the most powerful production handgun in the world.

The Model 29 starts with a carbon-steel frame and includes a fixed red ramp in front and an adjustable rear sight.

The single-action/double-action trigger is wide and comfortable, sporting the same slick greasy mechanicals for which Smith is justifiably revered.

The 6.5-inch carbon-steel barrel gives the gun an overall length of an even foot.

The Model 29 has been produced in a variety of barrel lengths, but this one was Harry’s.

Smith and Wesson Model 29 .44 Magnum with loaded cylinder open
The Model 29’s greasy smooth action makes reloads fast by revolver standards.

The cylinder, frame and barrel are all beautifully blued, while the unpretentious walnut grips exude a timeless American power vibe.

There is just something mystical about the synergy of all these graceful lines that causes an inevitable surge in serum testosterone. Just gazing upon it will make your heart race.

Range Report

Question my manhood if you must, but I do not find running the Model 29 .44 Magnum to be a particularly enjoyable experience.

The Model 29 will push less energetic .44 Special rounds as well, and those are indeed fun. Full-power .44 Magnum loads, however, peg my fun meter in fairly short order.

The greasy, smooth, double-action/single-action trigger should hang in the Louvre as the very physical manifestation of mechanical art.

The gun’s particulars such as the cylinder release, ejector, cylinder fit and sights are the embodiment of ballistic perfection.

Prodigious recoil notwithstanding, the gun shoots better than do I out to 50 meters or more.

Technical Specifications

Smith and Wesson Model 29
Caliber .44 Magnum
Barrel Length 6.5 Inches
Overall Length 12 Inches
Weight 47.7 Ounces
Capacity Six Rounds
Sights Red Ramp/Adjustable Rear
Finish Blued
Grips Wood
MSRP $1,169

Denouement

The classic blued Model 29 with its Dirty Harry-esque 6.5-inch barrel is currently offered on the Smith and Wesson website with an MSRP of $1,169.

Adjusted for inflation, this is about what they cost back in 1956. You don’t typically buy one of these massive wheelguns to really shoot much.

Most of us just stare lovingly at ours. Simply hefting the thing will reliably give you the tiniest little twitch to your eye and sprinkle a little gravel in your voice.

In a pinch, it will also likely blow a man’s head clean off.

Performance Specifications

Smith And Wesson Model 29 .44 Magnum

Load Group Size (Inches) Velocity (Feet Per Second)
Federal 240-Grain Hydra-Shok 1.25 1,387
Federal 280-Grain Swift A-Frame 1.25 1,127
Federal Fusion 240-Grain JHP 0.5 1,462
Hornady 240-Grain JHP XTP 1.5 1,643
Hornady 225-Grain FTX 0.6 1,433

*Group size is the best three of four rounds measured center to center, fired from a simple rest at 15 meters. Velocity is the average of three rounds fired across a Caldwell Ballistic Chronograph oriented 10 feet from the muzzle.

 

Categories
All About Guns

FN 510 Tactical 10mm

Categories
Some Scary thoughts The Green Machine

On Command: A Confession BY ANGRY STAFF OFFICER

I don’t want to be a battalion commander. I don’t want to be a brigade commander. I don’t want to command anything, ever again.

For an Army officer to say, this is well nigh on heresy. I nearly expected George C. Marshall himself to descend from his lofty throne on Mount This We’ll Defend and smite me down with his Army Strong Scepter as I typed those words. As officers, we are taught from our very beginnings as second lieutenants that battalion command is the end-all goal of our careers. And I believed it, too. I wanted it.

I wanted to wear the silver oak leaves and receive the colors from my brigade commander, seeing all the campaign streamers and unit awards, and knowing that was entrusted to me. That weighty responsibility, all in my hands. And then, I could make positive changes in soldiers’ lives. We could make the Army fun again. My staff and I, we could cut through the BS and show soldiers that their lives in the Army didn’t have to suck. We could make a difference. I truly wanted that.

And then I had company command. Well, command(s). Like battalion command, I had yearned for company command for years. For years, people had told me, “Oh, just wait for company command, you’ll love it.” I was sure I would. Command was a privilege, not a right, I was told. Damn right, and I wanted that privilege. Like all senior lieutenants, I was champing at the bit to take the guidon and run with it. And I did. And it was a blast.

For about a year and a half.

Then the running became a slog. Then the slog became a morass. And then I began to feel like I was drowning. I was exhausted. I was tired of fighting ridiculous battles with higher echelons to do the simplest of things. I was tired of the late-night texts and the phone calls, wondering what one of the soldiers in my unit had done this time. I was tired of the endless meetings, the signatures on an infinity of forms, of constantly feeling like for every step forward, I took two steps back. I was tired of fighting personnel battles, trying to ensure soldiers got to go where it worked best for them and the Army, only to get slapped down. Of building training plans which had to be changed less than a month out because someone above me failed to plan correctly. Of receiving conflicting guidance, where somehow even the most basic things became complicated. Of constantly balancing peoples’ egos and personalities with each other. Of acting as recruiting officer and commander, simultaneously. I was exhausted.

On paper, though, we were winning. Across two line company commands, we averaged the highest retention rates in the battalion and in some years, the whole state. We did this because we treated soldiers like human beings. We treated endemic unit issues and helped soldiers get into marriage, financial, or personal counseling. We destroyed other units’ metrics in training and were rated the best company of our type in our JRTC rotation. We somehow managed to have a robust and fun training schedule during the pandemic, while keeping soldiers safe. All the training paid off when we mobilized the company in 48 hours to get on the ground in DC after January 6. We won best unit in the battalion for years running. Officers, NCOs, and soldiers got to go to their dream schools. We helped so many soldiers get full time jobs in the National Guard so they could spread their skills around and build a solid financial base. We developed good relationships with other units and I got to work with some amazing leaders. And personally, I racked up top blocks on my OER for every year of command. On paper, I was best qualified and on track for battalion command. But I was exhausted.

I knew I needed to come out of command about four months before I actually did. But there’s that thing in your head, where you think, “to be a good leader, I have to give it my everything.” There’s a vivid picture in my memory of my conversation with my battalion executive officer, where I said I needed a break…”But if you really need me to, I can do four full years,” I heard myself say. Totally not like a masochist at all, nope.

I came out of command after 3 1/2 years and as I told someone when they asked me where I wanted to go next, I said, “A dark room where no one talks to me, and I can just read some doctrine or something.” The universe – or some kindly deity – came to my rescue and got me a dream assignment that took me far out of the universe of the operational force. Someplace I could finally take a knee and breathe. It felt weird. And on reflection, I came up with a troubling realization.

I did not love my company command. God knows, I wanted to. I loved the people I worked with, but command? Naw, I’m good. Then I began to think about battalion command and my brain basically shut down. Maybe I just had nothing more to give, or maybe…maybe it held nothing for me anymore. This was an embarrassing thought and I was reluctant to share it with anyone else, because it sounds like admitting failure and weakness.

Then I began to talk to my post-command peers, from across all components of the Army and a whole slew of branches. There were people who had deployed with their companies, some had commanded basic training companies, some who had incredibly specialized commands, and others who had basic branch commands. To a person, when we talked about if we wanted battalion command, the answer was, “Naw, I’m good.” Amazingly, we’d all had very similar experiences. Successful commands, top-blocked on evals, the works; but utterly and entirely drained, disillusioned, jaded, and with no desire to move to that next rung on the ladder. Precisely because they felt like they couldn’t actually make any meaningful changes – all while being ground down and kept away from their families.

So that’s why I write this. Not to complain about the Army. This is for all those other officers out there who might be thinking that you’re the anomaly, the aberration. That something’s wrong with you. Nope, you’re pretty damn normal from what I can see.

However, it should perhaps be sounding some alarm bells for the Army. If it was just me who had been feeling this way, as I thought for a while, then that’s a “me” problem – and I have no problem admitting that. Indeed, it took me so long to write this – I’m almost two years post-command – because I wanted to make sure this *wasn’t* just me being a cantankerous, salty moron. As, you know, I have the propensity to be from time to time. As it turned out, it’s not just a me problem.

Which then leads me to conjecture, that if you have thinking, capable, dynamic, engaged, and caring officers, who are rated among the best, but who are scrambling to find their ways out of their basic branches so as to not have to compete for command…that sounds like an Army problem. And it also means that those who are competing for battalion commands are either the very best of the best (and probably superheroes, to boot), or the egotistical, non self-aware narcissists that absolutely should never lead soldiers but somehow we keep meeting them in places of authority.

If you are looking at the conclusion, here, for a solution to this problem, I regret to inform you that I do not have one. Is there a way to make command less burdensome? Probably, but that would involve reforming the culture of the Army from the top down, which I don’t think I have the brainpower or the rank to call for, let alone the digital space to quantify.

Perhaps this can begin a dialogue, however, as we discuss how we treat command. The times ahead are not getting any simpler, and we will need the most capable minds in the Army to be in the best places for them in the years to come (not mine, it’s barely capable of holding two competing thoughts in it at the same time). As we discuss talent management, this needs to be part of that conversation.

As for me, who knows – maybe I’ll change my mind as I go through my other key duty positions. But I also know that if you do not want to be a commander, you should not be a commander. There’s plenty of fulfilment in the rest of the Army for me.

And hey, if you survived command and loved it, and were good at it, and aren’t some sort of absolute psychopathic micromanager who hates their families – good on you. I’m glad you exist. We need you.

For everyone else, you’re not alone.