You Will Shoot Your Eye Out

Can fit people have large waists? Are skinny people automatically in shape? Is it OK to suck in the gut?

These matters have been prompting considerable navel-gazing in the nation’s military, along with such questions as—where should the tape measure even go, and is it the right tool for modern days?

The Pentagon hasn’t been able to conclusively decide where a person’s waist is, which presents one problem.

The Army says it is at a soldier’s belly button, which is easy to find but kind of high. The Navy says it is at the iliac crest, which makes sense, if one has heard of an iliac before. The Air Force and Space Force says it is between the lowest rib and the top of the hip bone. And the Marine Corps, when measuring female Marines, uses an intricate formula that for some reason takes into account the sternum—which even a person without a Ph.D. in physiology knows is closer to the shoulders than to what most people consider to be the waist.

“There was a whole meeting on this,” said Dr. Karl E. Friedl, a senior research scientist for the Army, recalling a 1998 National Institutes of Health gathering. “It was just a hilarious talk.”

The military definition of a waist is actually a weighty topic. A few extra inches of girth around the midsection can mean a person has to start a remedial exercise program or can even get kicked out for being overweight.

While the Department of Defense appears to be the quintessential top-down bureaucracy, the only real guidance it gives the services is that they come up with fitness and body-composition standards “consistent with established scientific principles of physical training,” according to a Pentagon official. Every branch of the armed forces is supposed to figure it out for itself, making for a bureaucratic mess.

The humble tape measure has loomed large over military life because it is something that many soldiers, no matter how fit and accomplished, have had to stomach. Troops don’t just have to be able to pass fitness tests, they have to not be overweight and that is where the punctilio of waist measurement comes in.

Jarred Rickey has been an infantryman, Black Hawk helicopter pilot and currently serves as spokesman for the Rhode Island National Guard. Rickey, 44, is just over 6-feet tall and regularly tips the scales at more than 200 pounds, he said. He’s always breezed through the Army’s fitness tests, but for decades has had to face the tape measure to boot.

“It doesn’t matter if your boss is cool,” he said, because the tape-measuring system was designed to prevent people playing favorites.

Strategies to prevent shenanigans have included having tape measure-wielding troops come from a different unit to prevent friends from giving each other breaks, or enemies from going hard on each other.

The history of military fitness standards shows it has always been as much art as science when it comes to judging whether a corporal is considered too corpulent to serve.

European militaries in the 1800s made sure a fellow’s chest was in good proportion to the rest of his body. In the U.S. during the Civil War era, a doctor only checked to make sure a soldier’s gut didn’t stick out too far, according to a statistics the military published in 1875.

By the advent of World War I, the military was more concerned with keeping underweight and weak soldiers out of uniform than screening out overweight ones, although there was guidance that overweight people weren’t suitable for cavalry service.

After World War II, the Army had Harvard professor Earnest Hooton apply the now discredited pseudoscience of somatotyping to try to determine what makes the best soldier. The idea was that body shape would reveal not fitness levels but personality traits. (Hooton’s study was later consigned to the scientific scrapheap)

Over time, as Americans got heavier, concern shifted from scrawny soldiers to their heftier counterparts.

 “Each soldier is a representative of the United States Government,” said a 1976 revision of physical-fitness and weight-control regulations. “Waistlines that stretch the front of an otherwise well-fitting blouse or shin, and ‘pot-bellies’ detract from good military appearance.”

In recent years, fitness has gotten wrapped up in measuring tape, and the top brass is wondering if that is the best we can do.

 The military measures waistlines to determine its version of a body-mass index, or BMI, an estimate of how much excess flesh a person is carrying. The calculation typically involves gauging a service member’s height against waist girth.

While waistline measurements, when done correctly, can be pretty accurate for estimating BMI, it is hard to make sure people aren’t holding in their guts or that tape measures are applied to the correct place.

Expanding knowledge about fitness—and the American physique—is also changing things. A former football linebacker with a large waistline, for instance, might be the fittest person in a unit.

And one problem the Army faces these days, according to Friedl, a specialist in physiological performance, is a high number of “skinny-fat” recruits. These people don’t look out of shape but, indeed, are because of sedentary lifestyles that have left them with low muscle mass and frail bones and connective tissue. At Ft. Moore in Georgia, new soldiers are given calcium supplements to counter a recent uptick in broken feet and bones in the legs, according to several senior soldiers in charge of training.

“It’s guys who look good in skinny jeans, but they have high fat because there’s no muscle,” Friedl said.

Further confusing matters is the growing number of women in uniform. For men, a chest-to-waist ratio is a decent determinant of body composition, but women carry weight differently than men, according to Friedl.

And so after centuries of militaries trying to figure out who is fit to be in uniform, the U.S. is turning to technology.

The Marine Corps still uses tape measures, but as of this year, if someone is thought to be overweight they are given either a “bioelectrical impedance analysis” or “dual energy X-ray absorptiometry” scan to figure out if the person is, technically speaking, overweight. Marine Corps officials said the Corps may soon only use such scanners, ditching the tape measurements altogether. The Marine Corps fitness tests rely on more than just running and pull ups, and if a Marine aces the multipart tests then they can forego the tape no matter their body shape.

And the Army has also come up with a new multipart fitness test, with six different exercises. A top score likewise gets even a stout person a waiver to avoid the dreaded measuring tape. In these cases the service can be confident such a physical specimen definitely is in shape.

“In the Army’s wisdom, incentivizing you to score well on the fitness test, they tricked me,” Rickey said. “I work out hard anyway, but now I’m pushing hard on a daily basis to score well. I like competing with 20-year-olds.”

————————————————————————————     I myself was always on weight control but I always got the job done. The thing that gets me that if you do a few weeks in the field. Almost everyone gets down to their fighting weight. Plus not everyone is out there pulling triggers and inserting bayonets into other folks bodies.

Now would I and the Generals love to have everyone as fit and trim as a 19 year old freshly minted Airborne Ranger. You bet! But it is never going to happen anytime soon.  As it is I applaud the Army & The Marines for doing their fat man programs and following it up. So maybe there is hope for us bubble buts out there that want to serve. Grumpy