Categories
War

I Went To Ukraine’s Killzone Frontline

Categories
Soldiering This great Nation & Its People War

A Contested Legacy: The Men of Montford Point and the Good War by Cameron McCoy, PhD

Top Photo: US Marine Corps Corporal Edgar R. Huff inspects a weapon at Montford Point Camp, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. He enlisted in the Marine Corps in June 1942. Huff became a legend among the Marines who were trained there by earning the rank of First Sergeant in less than two years. He retired in 1972 as a Sergeant Major. Photo: National Archives

On January 23, 1942, the 17th Commandant of the Marine Corps, Major General Thomas Holcomb, testified to the General Board of the United States Navy:

There would be a definite loss of efficiency in the Marine Corps if we have to take Negroes. [The] Negro race has every opportunity now to satisfy its aspirations for combat, in the Army—a very much larger organization than the Navy or Marine Corps—and their desire to enter the naval service is largely, I think, to break into a club that doesn’t want them.

Unwilling to step beyond the significant fact of having Black men in fighting units, the US Army and Marine Corps took the position that their respective organizations should not be laboratories for “social experimentation.” The common belief among senior military officials in both services was that integration would be detrimental to unit effectiveness, combat efficiency, and preparedness and create unnecessary racial friction. This reassertion of white supremacy corresponded to a broader ideological campaign to preserve whiteness and exclusivity.

After he made this statement, Holcomb soon had to adjust his notions: Four months later, Howard P. Perry became the first Black man officially listed on a duty roster at Camp Montford Point and recorded as “Montford Point Recruit #1.” After more than 80 years of tracing the significance of the Marines of Montford Point as military pioneers of courage and bravery, these men of legend remain largely unknown.

In the fall of 1944, during the Battle of Peleliu, in one of the most bitter battles of World War II for the Marines, a platoon of African American Marines fought their way to capture an airstrip and save a company of embattled white Marines. This company of white Marines knew that their time on the small coral island would be painful and short without the support of reinforcements.

Despite being saved by a platoon of Black Marines, leaders of the company of white Marines refused to recognize these Montford Pointers for saving their lives: It would have been an embarrassment if word had gotten back to the company’s senior officers of this incident. This level of prejudice and discrimination had a crippling ripple effect on the combat service of Black Marines for the rest of the war.

 

After Peleliu, no one heard about the African American unit’s heroic deeds. Like in so many other wars, these Black heroes received no medals, no front-page news stories covering the events on the tiny coral island; there weren’t even any rumors or tales of their actions.

After World War II, these men returned to the United States only to have the merits of their wartime achievements vigorously questioned. Unlike white Marines, these men were suspects. To many, the audacity these men had in donning the Marine Corps uniform and emblems was a direct affront to the sacredness of those who earned the title “Marine” in a bygone era.

Moments like the Battle of Peleliu and the institutional and social opposition these men experienced were rampant. Consequently, Black Marines’ humanity, manhood, and rights to full citizenship were always under intense scrutiny by white commanders. The efforts of senior military officials to undermine their service compromised their right to be counted among the elite, sidelining their story to the fringes of Marine Corps and American history.

 

Howard P. Perry

Howard P. Perry. Photo: Roger Smith

The opportunity for Black Marines to rightfully cement their legacy as decorated American heroes and icons of the Pacific war like John Basilone and Lewis “Chesty” Puller was such an embarrassment to the Marine Corps that its high character leaders quickly compromised their integrity to protect a false image of unified bravery and combat valor.

Firsthand accounts of the Battle of Peleliu disproved white racist assumptions about Black servicemembers’ tactical abilities in the crucible of war. However, the lack of genuine and unbiased leadership subjected Black valor to historical scrutiny and subsequent erasure.

Hence, the dearth of accurate accounts such as these only served to reinforce popular notions and biased studies that Black men were unable to withstand the rigors of intense warfare. In a sense, this made it implausible for war planners and government officials to believe in the prospect of Black bravery during combat. As a result, the figure and image of the Black Marine remained in the shadows.

Despite their commendable service during World War II, the Marines of Montford Point would regularly contend with societal forces that vehemently resisted all measures taken toward racial integration.

Hence, their legacy and contributions to a country that would not accept them as equals remained in question, minimizing their public profile. As a result, the harshest eyes scrutinized their combat service with agendas based on dubious science, arguing that Black men were innate cowards.

What their legacy means today is still difficult to appreciate because it is mixed with distinct emotions, motivations, and poignant reactions. For activists, their legacy has not received enough attention; for some senior Marine officials, the reaction typically manifests in the question: “What else are we supposed to do?” The history of the first Black Marines walks a painful path to validation and legitimacy.

Before Congress had to intervene in recognizing the Marines of Montford Point, did the Marine Corps miss an opportunity? Did the Marine Corps genuinely want to herald a group of young Black men who could have left a legacy defined by immense courage, discipline, and bravery? Maybe.

A platoon of black "boot recruits" listen to their drill instructor

A platoon of black “boot recruits” listen to their drill instructor, Sgt. Gilbert Hubert Johnson, whose job is to turn them into finished Marines at Montford Point, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, N.C., April 1943.  Photo: DVIDS

Unfortunately, the measures civilian and Marine officials took to restore organizational integrity based on a foundation of white supremacy harmed the Marine Corps across two more wars. Because of institutionalized racism, the Marines of Montford Point would be subject to comments like, “I did not realize that a war was going on until I returned to the States. [But when] I saw you people wearing our uniform, [the] globe and anchor, [I knew we were in trouble].”

Incredulous of the sight of Black Marines in uniform, Brigadier General Henry L. Larsen continued: “[I’ve now] seen dog Marines, women Marines, and you people [as a result of the war].” This remark by Larsen at Camp Montford Point in the summer of 1943 was not only insulting and insensitive, but it made Montford Pointers question their very existence in an institution that took pride in being the first to fight.

The legacy of the Marines of Montford Point is tremendous. These men are finally viewed as royalty, heroes, icons, and trailblazers of the highest class. Their military achievements are recognized as groundbreaking and a testament to their long suffering during an era of extraordinary racial and social tension.

After Congress passed legislation in 2011 for them to receive the Congressional Gold Medal, America’s first Black Marines were awarded the nation’s highest civilian honor during the summer of 2012. The Congressional Gold Medal is only awarded to persons “who have performed an achievement that has an impact on American history and culture that is likely to be recognized as a major achievement in the recipient’s field long after the achievement.”

For the men of Montford Point, flags waved, bands played, and their status was VIP at every event. This long overdue recognition has led Marine Corps officials to begin reevaluating earlier military decorations awarded to African American Marines, which prejudiced eyes may have colored.

For their outstanding perseverance and courage that inspired change in the Marine Corps, an accompanying cover story for USA Today read: “At last, honors for the first black Marines: Montford Point Marines to become part of Corps’ story.” Since June 1, 1942, Black Marines had officially been part of the Marine Corps story—69 years later, they had moved from footnote to front page.

Despite this appalling historical oversight, the Senate had now recognized them as “liberators of the people of the Pacific,” proclaiming them members of the inner circle of America’s Greatest Generation.

This belated validation, however, has done little to compensate for the Marine Corps’ past behaviors, during which the organization—a branch that believed in its own initiative and pioneering spirit—missed opportunity after opportunity to lead by example in validating these pathbreakers for the world to see.

The legacy of these men of legend brings up hard feelings primarily because the Marine Corps recognizes how its historical treatment of the Marines of Montford Point has had residual effects on the 21st-century Marine Corps. Many Black Marines, especially those serving as Marine officers, point to Frederick C. Branch, the Marine Corps’ first Black officer, commissioned on November 10, 1945, as a benchmark for a lack of progress in the officer ranks. Instead, the Marine Corps successfully denied its Black trailblazers multiple opportunities to be recognized as members of America’s publicly acclaimed Greatest Generation when it mattered most.

Despite this flagrant negligence, no longer would the past be contested for the first Black Marines. Quite the opposite is occurring as institutional doors open to more significant opportunities to recognize the legacy of the Marines of Montford. And while the intense sting of bigotry may be fading, and their numbers dwindling in their ultimate post-military life, many Montford Pointers have never felt the “mission was accomplished.” Their battle continues today.

On August 6, 2022, however, General David H. Berger, the 38th Commandant of the Marine Corps, promoted Michael Langley, who became the Marine Corps’ first Black four-star general in the military service’s 246-year history.

Langley paid homage to the men of Montford Point and Frederick C. Branch, adding that this “milestone and what it means to the Corps is quite essential. Not just because [of] the mark in history, but what it will affect going forward, especially for those younger across society that want to aspire and look to the Marine Corps as an opportunity.”

During the promotion ceremony at the Marine Corps Barracks Washington, Berger made a powerful statement in honoring the late Lieutenant General Frank E. Peterson—the first Black Marine three-star general and aviator—while recognizing Langley’s historic accomplishment: “43 years we go from our first African American general to now our first—I think leading to many more—four-star African American generals.” Langley’s achievement of four stars is monumental, but it is a stark reminder of the astonishingly slow evolution of Marine Corps leader’s management of Black Marines since their inception in 1942.

Categories
This great Nation & Its People War

Royce Williams: America’s First Stealth Ace by Will Dabbs

Fighter pilots are invariably obnoxious extroverts. I’ve known a few. The profession selects for those particular character traits. They honestly earn that.

When your job is to climb all by your lonesome into a machine filled with kerosene that will propel you faster than some bullets so you can go fight to the death with some comparably capable dude in another similar craft, well, you have my respect. However, those guys are notorious for wanting to publicize their accomplishments.

top gun poster
Most military pilots are fairly off-putting. I certainly was. However, some are admittedly worse than others.

Military flying is invariably edgy. That’s one of the reasons I loved it so. You learn the limits of your machine and then go out and explore them. That’s also one of the reasons most military aviators are fairly young. Old guys have accumulated way too much sense. However, when you hit that sweet, crazy spot, magic happens…

The Guy

Elmer Royce Williams was born in April of 1925. He went by Royce. Royce and his brother aspired to be pilots from a young age. When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and dragged the United States into World War 2, the boys were just too young. However, as soon as the military would have them, Royce and his brother enlisted and trained as Aviators.

Royce Williams
Royce Williams was one seriously hard-core Naval Aviator. (Photo/Public domain)

Royce Williams pinned on his Naval Aviator wings in Pensacola in August of 1945, around the same time that the two atomic bombs ended the war. It looked like he had missed it. However, he soon qualified as a fighter pilot in F9F Panther jets. With things heating up across the Korean peninsula, Royce deployed aboard the USS Oriskany to do his bit.

The Plane

I always thought the Grumman F9F Panther to be an objectively beautiful airplane. Developed in the closing months of WW2, the Panther was a single-engine day fighter that was armed with four 20mm cannon in addition to an assortment of air-to-ground munitions. Most production variants were powered by a Pratt and Whitney J48-P-2 turbojet engine.

Grumman F9F
The Grumman F9F Panther was a gorgeous airplane. (Photo/Public domain)

The Panther was cleared for carrier operations in September of 1949. Panthers were deployed to Korea from the very outset of the war. The F9F was the first US Navy fighter aircraft to see air-to-air combat in that theater.

The Situation

Things were still pretty weird over and around Korea in November of 1952. It had only been seven years since the United States and the Soviet Union stood side-by-side to defeat the Nazis. Now the two nations reviled each other. This clash of cultures came to a head across the 38th Parallel.

The Korean War ran for three years from June 1950 through the summer of 1953. The communist North battled the free South for dominance of ideologies. Once it began looking like the South might be gaining the upper hand, Red China came pouring across the border with tens of thousands of fresh combat troops. In the winter of 1952, Korea was all frozen chaos and blood.

F9F panther. Royce Williams
The F9F Panther was used primarily for ground attack missions in Korea. (Photo/Public domain)

On 18 November 1952, Lieutenant Royce Williams was serving in VF-781 “The Pacemakers” as part of Task Force 77 supporting ground operations in Korea. His first mission of the day was unremarkable.

After landing on the Oriskany for gas, Williams and three of his comrades launched again, this time to conduct a combat air patrol over the fleet off the coast in the Sea of Japan near Hoeryong, North Korea. The objective of the CAP was to identify enemy aircraft that might threaten the Task Force and kill them.

The Encounter

Williams spotted a flight of seven MiG-15s flying at about 50,000 feet high above the four-ship flight of Panthers. These primitive jet fighters were all fairly finicky machines. One of the four American aircraft experienced a mechanical failure and had to return to the carrier. That pilot’s wingman went back with him per protocol.

Soviet MiG-15 Royce Williams
The Soviet MiG-15 was a game-changing warplane when it was first introduced. (Photo/Public domain)

LT Williams and his wingman, LT (jg) Dave Rolands, climbed to intercept. It was now seven to two. In moments, Williams and Rolands were in the midst of a veritable swarm of hostile communist fighter planes.

F86 Sabre
The F86 Sabre could mix it up on even terms with the MiG-15, but not much else would. (Photo/Public domain)

The MiG-15 was a legend. Tiny, heavily-armed, fast, and eminently maneuverable, the MiG-15 was arguably the premier fighter aircraft in the world at the time. The F86 Sabre jet could give the nimble little warplane a run for its money, but only just. I’ve pawed over a MiG-15 before, and that thing seems like a toy. It is unnaturally small. In the skies above Korea, however, these vicious little monsters were killers.

The Fight

It’s tough to capture in print just how fast things can go pear-shaped in jet air combat. During head-on engagements, the combined closure rate was over 1,000 knots.

The MiG-15 packed 23mm and 37mm cannons, both of which fired deadly high-explosive shells. All it took was one in the wrong spot. Of that initial engagement, Williams said, “The four that had turned to the right came at us in a finger-four formation and started firing. All of them were shooting.” Now it was game on.

plane guns. Royce Williams
Given how small and maneuverable the MiG-15 was, it was exceptionally well-armed. (Photo/USAF photo)

LT Williams had a total of 720 rounds for his 20mm guns. With MiG-15s swarming everywhere, he knew he would have to make every round count. Wrenching his nimble Grumman fighter around, he found himself on the tail of one of the MiGs.

MiG-15

His first solid burst chewed that MiG-15 to pieces. One down. LT (jg) Rolands dove after that first crippled enemy plane and was out of the fight. Outnumbered six-to-one, LT Williams faced the remaining enemy aircraft alone.

old war plane
The MiG-15 was developed immediately following WW2 using advanced Luftwaffe jet technology. (Photo/Public domain)

Williams lacked the time to keep track of how he was doing. He just traded fire with the nimble little MiGs as the opportunity allowed.

In short order, a second MiG went down in flames, followed by a third and then a fourth. In his words, “I did not have the liberty of following them down. I had more of them shooting at me. I would aim, hit, do some damage, then maneuver defensively…Two of the kills were head-on, and the others were from the rear. They went past too fast to permit deflection shots, so I concentrated on getting on their tail.”

Struck!

Along the way, the communist MiGs were also shooting Williams’ plane to bits. One 37mm round struck his aircraft amidships. This explosive shell took out his hydraulic system and trashed his flight controls. Williams described the situation this way: “The 37 hit the accessory section of the engine and did a super amount of damage. I only had elevator control; fortunately, the landing gear extended from gravity.”

Now out of ammo and running on fumes in a fighter plane shot absolutely to pieces, LT Williams limped back to the Oriskany.

One MiG followed him back, but Rolands caught up before it could engage. Rolands’ guns had jammed, but he was nonetheless able to persuade this last communist fighter to head for home.

Coming Home

old navy war plane. Royce Williams
There wasn’t a great deal left of LT Williams’ F9F Panther when he finally planted that thing on the flight deck of the USS Oriskany. (Photo/Public domain)

With no flaps, Williams’ Panther approached the carrier at a blistering 170 knots. That’s around 200 mph. The Oriskany’s flight deck was only 911 feet long. Williams should have ditched his plane or ejected. However, this was winter in the Sea of Japan. Given the frigid nature of the water, there was no guarantee he could have survived.

As a pilot myself, I simply cannot imagine trying to land a shot-up airplane on a 911-foot runway at 170 knots. However, LT Williams caught the third wire and walked away without a scratch. Ground crewmen counted 263 holes in the mangled Panther before pushing it over the side.

The Aftermath

The entire dogfight went on for 35 minutes. That made this aerial engagement the longest in US Navy history. It was one of the longest single dogfights ever documented.

However, there was more to it than LT Williams realized. American intelligence officers had intercepted and translated the enemy pilots’ radio traffic. These were not communist Chinese warplanes. These seven MiGs were flown by seasoned Russian combat pilots. Everybody in the American chain of command took note of that.

U.s air force plane
Imagine LT Williams’ surprise when he found that he had been fighting for more than half an hour with half a dozen first-line Soviet fighter pilots. (Photo/Public domain)

Little was known about the MiG-15 at the time, and the fact that Williams had killed Russians was legitimately explosive.

LT Williams was exhaustively debriefed by intelligence officers onboard the Oriskany and then by a variety of Navy Admirals. He then had a sit-down with the Secretary of Defense.

A few weeks later, Williams was called upon to relate his story directly to President Eisenhower during his visit to the war zone. Then they all decided, as the Soviet Union was not a formal combatant in the war, that the entire engagement should be classified and covered up.

Details of the fight were removed from US Navy and National Security Agency records. LT Williams was sworn to secrecy. He took that oath seriously.

Nowadays, it seems like every Navy SEAL at Coronado is given some kind of podcast contract as soon as he completes Hell Week. By contrast, LT Williams never told anybody. Not his wife. Not his military pilot brother. He kept his secret sacred until 2002, when the records were finally declassified.

The Rest of the Story

At the time, LT Royce Williams was the top-scoring carrier-based Naval Aviator of the Korean War, but nobody knew about it. He was eventually credited with four kills that day.

However, once the Iron Curtain came down and Soviet records were examined, it was discovered that only one of those seven Russian jets made it back to base intact.

Grumman figher planes
LT Williams coaxed every scrap of performance out of his tough Grumman fighter plane. (Photo/Public domain)

The stealth ace reference in the title may be a bit of an exaggeration. However, it also might not. Williams was the only one to mix it up with those Russian jets, and six of them were ultimately lost.

Royce Williams went on to fly a further 100 missions in A4 Skyhawks and F4 Phantoms over Vietnam. He served as skipper of the USS Eldorado from 1969 through 1971 and retired from the Navy as a Captain in 1980. He is 100 years old and lives in Escondido, California, today, the very personification of the humble hero.

Addendum: I wrote this piece a good while back. There has been an ongoing effort to get Captain Williams the Medal of Honor for his extraordinary actions that fateful day in the skies over Korea.

In December of 2022, US Secretary of the Navy Carlos Del Toro awarded Williams the Navy Cross, that service’s second-highest award for valor in combat. The US House of Representatives approved specific legislation to waive the statute of limitations requirement so Williams could receive the MOH he so richly deserved.

Some pogues in the Senate subsequently removed the reference in conference. If my opinion counts for anything, it is past time to resurrect that initiative. That great old hero ain’t getting any younger.

Categories
All About Guns This great Nation & Its People War

every Deadliest AMERICAN Tanks Used in WWII

Categories
War

Lepanto 1571: Shattering the Idea of Ottoman Invincibility

Categories
This great Nation & Its People War

American Revolution: The Battle of Saratoga, 1777

Categories
Allies Soldiering War

British Mounted Infantry in Egypt

The British conquest of Egypt (1882), also known as the Anglo-Egyptian War

Categories
This great Nation & Its People War Well I thought it was neat!

Another, I think that this man is one hell of a STUD!!!!!!!!

Categories
Allies War You have to be kidding, right!?!

Gremlins And Masterdom – Britain’s Vietnam War

For most people, war in Vietnam means just one thing: the doomed US campaign of the 1960s and 70s. As Stuart Hadaway explains, there was a much earlier conflict involving the British and arising out of the post-war chaos in the region. Bizarrely, it also involved surrendered Japanese forces and aircraft in support of British operations.

A Spitfire Mk. XIV of 273 Sqn at RAF Tan Son Nhut. The squadron began to receive these in November 1945.

In August 1945, the sudden outbreak of peace caught South East Asia Command completely by surprise. Plans were being laid for operations stretching far into 1946, including Operation Zipper, the amphibious invasion of Malaya. Extensive preparations had been made, including training and equipping RAF units and personnel for detached, expeditionary operations under field conditions, with adequate supplies and vehicles. This would prove invaluable as an urgent need suddenly arose to send smaller forces to targets all across the region to seize key points, free prisoners of war and take the official surrender of Japanese forces still in the field.

For French Indochina, this led to Operation Masterdom. The Japanese had moved in Indochina in 1941 to secure their route to the oil and rubber reserves of Malaya, effectively taking over control from the Vichy French. Throughout the war the country had been something of a sideshow. It fell between the Chinese Theatre of Operations and South East Asia Command, who clashed several times over who should take control of the area. Neither particularly wanted it for immediate strategic reasons, but rather for political reasons relating to post-war spheres of influence. In the end, at the Potsdam Conference, the country was split along the 16th Parallel, the north going to China and the south to SEAC.

Blurred Lines

Inside the country chaos reigned. A tenuous French government maintained power, while a dizzying array of internal splinter groups agitated for independence in various political flavours. In March 1945 the Japanese officially toppled the French government and the country was declared to be the independent country of Vietnam.

The Allies, particularly the Americans, had supported various groups regardless of ideology, looking for likely leaders of post-war regimes that they could control. (Famously, the Americans even convinced the Chinese to let Ho Chi Minh out of prison so he could return to Indochina.) As the war neared an end, the activities of the Americans became increasingly focused on not just removing the Japanese and their puppet government, but also the French. Their staunch anti-Imperialist stance meant they wanted all of the European Powers to give up their possessions in the Far East, but they faced a tough resistance to this idea from the British. The French, however, were in less of a position to protest. Soon, US-backed Indo-Chinese groups were attacking not only the Japanese, but also the French attempting to regain control.

Thousands gather at Saigon’s docks to welcome the arrival of the British led occupation forces.

On the other hand, the British were equally determined to let the French keep the country, and a task force was sent to reinstall the French government in mid-September 1945. The 20th Indian Division was despatched under Major General Douglas Gracey, who was to have both military and political control in the country (although he reported militarily to Field Marshal Slim in Burma and politically to Lord Mountbatten at SEAC, who provided sometimes contradictory instructions). To support these separate missions, two RAF formations were also detailed for Indochina. An RAF Element under Air Cdre Walter Cheshire was added to the Control Commission, again reporting to Mountbatten, while No. 908 Wing under Gp Capt F. C. Sturgiss was formed to support the Army, and was controlled via AHQ Burma by Sir Keith Park as Allied Air Commander at SEAC.

The lines between these two formations was blurred from the start, and became more so when No. 908 Wing was disbanded and Air Head Quarters French Indochina, under Cheshire, was formed at RAF Saigon, the airfield at Tan Son Nhut just outside the city. The two RAF headquarters were co-located, and nobody seemed entirely clear to which organisation they nominally belonged. Instead, the whole HQ staff simply pitched in and did the work that needed doing, without worrying too much about the administrative distinctions.

Diverse Groups

If the members of the higher command structure were confused, this was even truer for those lower down the chain. The Spitfire Mk. VIIIs of 273 Sqn began to arrive at Tan Son Nhut on 19 September 1945, eight days after the army had begun landing, and found themselves occupying an airfield full of Japanese aircraft still guarded and operated by the Japanese! Even a month later the Operations Record Book (ORB) would record: ‘The situation in Saigon is bewildering, though, when we have our former enemies now our allies against a foe of which nearly all the squadron never knew the existence.’

This view permeated all ranks, with the subtle shades of political allegiances and agendas being lost on most of the incoming British. After the British and French mounted a coup to overthrown the new Vietnamese government and re-establish colonial rule, violence broke out around the capital and across the country. The diverse groups taking up arms against the French, and now the British, were a bewildering array – one intelligence report, slightly hysterical in tone, even talks about ‘Buddhist guerrillas’ – and for the most part the whole lot were lumped together as ‘Annamites’, after one of the country’s regions.

Although the war was over, victory did not mean a reduction of commitments for the British. Victory brought new challenges which ran well into the 1960s. For the first time in Britain peacetime conscription was maintained, but National Service could not alleviate the manpower shortage, nor was it cheap. Garrisons in Europe and the Middle East drained resources, as would financial difficulties – efforts in the Malayan Emergency only sustainable because profits from the colony funded military action. However, in 1945, there were urgencies Britain had to tackle in the Far East. Japanese forces had to be surrendered and repatriated, and newly-liberated colonies had to be administered until European governments returned.

Operation Masterdom was one case. Eager to go in, the British only arrived after the official surrender of Japan because of restrictions imposed by General Douglas MacArthur. This meant those imprisoned in camps were denied access to aid, but local revolutionary groups filled the power vacuum. When British and Indian troops entered Indochina to free prisoners and secure the country, they faced a new war. In one of history’s oddities, they utilised rearmed Japanese soldiers in a successful campaign after imposing hard won victory upon them.

Setting a precedent for the next half century, a professional and experienced British force led by men well-versed in internal security matters completed their objectives and signed responsibility over to French authorities before withdrawing.

The Spitfire pilots also found themselves in unfamiliar operational as well as geographic and political territory as strict rules of engagement were imposed by high authority. Only in certain areas, and under specific conditions, could they open fire on ground targets, and even then only after leaflets had been dropped. In effect, these rules meant that no action was possible at all – even on the rare occasions all of the conditions were met, the pass to drop leaflets was enough to cause the enemy to melt away.

For pilots fresh from the crucible of the Burma campaign, this was a deeply frustrating situation, especially as British and (more so) French units on the ground were coming under regular attack and they were impotent to help. When the first offensive strike operation was authorised on 16 October, the ORB records that there was ‘great excitement’, and that: ‘The team was selected by drawing out of a hat and then they were briefed. Then there was a great disappointment, the show was cancelled.’

An RAF airman poses with a Japanese guard.

Successful Attacks

Finally, on 11 December, it was recorded that: ‘At last the great day has arrived and permission has been given to strafe the Ammanites and give close support to French troops who are threatened by 1,000 Ammanites in the area MZ8086 northeast of Ban Me Thuot.’ Three Spitfire Mk. XIVs (which had begun arriving in late November) made successful attacks. To add to the momentousness of the day, that afternoon another highlight of the deployment occurred: the official surrender of the Japanese garrison: ‘At 16:00 hours a very impressive ‘Sword Surrendering’ ceremony took place outside Station Headquarters, when seventy-three Japanese Air Force Officers surrendered their swords to a similar number of Royal Air Force officers being of the same rank or status. Sqn Ldr W. J. Hibbert, Flt Lts W. E. Steele, S. S. Shisho, Fg Offs R. K. Parry, W. Hayes, B. Hirst, J. B. Wingate, Plt Offs H. Keen, and E. Gaukroger were the officers of the squadron who received swords from their equivalent Japanese officers – and weren’t they delighted!’

No doubt the event was particularly satisfying for Flt Lt Shisho, a Burmese officer who had not seen his family since the Japanese invasion.

While the Spitfires continued to fly regular reconnaissance sweeps and make ‘shows of force’ in support of land operations, the French had no such restrictions on their actions. Or rather, their only restrictions were with their equipment. There were not many French aircraft in the country; a few Moraine 500s (license built Fiesler Storchs), some Catalina flying boats, and a handful of salvaged Japanese fighters.

Soon, the Catalinas were begin used in a ground-attack role, surely a unique experience even for this versatile aircraft – and causing friction with Gracey by not bothering to drop leaflets first. The French Air Force was sending aircraft, Spitfire IXs, from France, but they would take months to arrive, and in the meantime the British were asked to loan them aircraft.

This issue was passed all the way up to Mountbatten and Park, the latter of whom was emphatic that the RAF could not loan aircraft to foreign powers. A wave of political issues entered the equation, from the Air Ministry wanting to help the French so as to ease negotiations to keep using Tan Son Nhut as a transport base, the disapproval of the anti-French Americans. SEAC itself was not keen as the Americans were demanding their Lend-Lease aircraft back, leaving the Command short of aircraft across the theatre. In the end, some cast-off Spitfire VIIIs were reluctantly passed to the French in mid-November, on the strict understanding they had the personnel and equipment to operate and maintain them. As it turned out, they French did not. As a consequence, they would be plagued by high accident and unserviceability rates. In fact, the attack by 273 Sqn on 11 December had only been staged because the French had no serviceable Spitfires themselves.

Gremlin Task Force

While the Spitfires conducted patrols and occasional close air support, and a detachment of Mosquitos of No. 684 Sqn conducted a photographic survey of the country to aid map-making, an entirely different RAF force was also in the air over Indochina: Gremlin Task Force.

Japanese naval ratings lay down their arms and surrender to the British in a ceremony in Saigon.

Saigon was ideally placed to form an important hub in the various air routes that criss-crossed South East Asia. However, transport aircraft, or even bombers that could be used as transports, were in short supply, with fuel for them even rarer. Or, at least, British and American aircraft and fuel was. What the RAF had access to at Tan Son Nhut, though, were plentiful Japanese aircraft, along with stores, aircrew and maintenance staff along with large stocks of fuel that could not be used on Allied aircraft. Japanese soldiers were already being used to supplement the British and Indian Army (and RAF Regiment) on the ground in defending key points, including the airfield, which was attacked by guerrillas several times.

Air Cdre Cheshire therefore decided to conscript the Imperial Japanese Air Force as well, forming Gremlin Task Force under the command of Squadron Leader H. F. McNabb. RAF roundels were painted over the Japanese rising suns, and a handful of British officers and wireless operators were designated to the force which was then simply left to get on with it. The Japanese would report their readiness state each morning, and various operations and tasks would be allocated accordingly. Mostly, these were transport sorties within Indochina, although trips to neighbouring Siam and even to Singapore were also made. In this way, Cheshire added considerably to the transport assets available to the RAF, and for very little cost. Problems did occur, not least because of the equipment and with language problems involved in air traffic control. One controller recalled that: ‘The first we would know is when a Japanese aircraft presented itself at the end of the runway, because we had no R/T communication with them. They were just flying by Mk 1 eyeball. They’d appear on the end of the runway, get a green light, and they’d be off.’
Japanese soldiers salute French Commandos in Saigon, September 1945. The Corps Léger d’Intervention was an interarm corps modelled on the Chindit brigades used in the Burma Campaign by
the British.

Doubtless these same problems caused alarm and despondency among the controllers at their destinations, especially if they had not been warned in advance that ‘mute’ Japanese aircraft were about to descend on them. For the most part the system ran smoothly, and British and Japanese ground crew worked well together. To begin with they were not supposed to mix, but inevitably, and as working relations improved, so any tension between the erstwhile enemies cooled. LAC Stan Collinson recalled: ‘The one thing that really annoyed us was that there was an edict from above that there was to be no fraternising in any conceivable way. Of course, it’s like all these rules, they’re all open to interpretation, and it becomes a necessity if you are working on these jobs, you have to talk with them… The people who were actually there [in Saigon] were what you might call the draftees, not the gung-ho types we’d had out in Burma or anything like that – they were a load of nutters, them.’

Heightened Circumstance

On the other hand, there was distinct friction between the British and the French authorities, even if among the civilian population relations were good. After months or years living in the jungle, the ORB for 273 Sqn records that ‘morale was high and everybody was delighted to see the well dressed French women in Saigon… [as well as at] the novelty and proximity of a practically European town with plenty of things to buy’.

A mixture of RAF and Gremlin Task Force aircraft at Tan Son Nhut.

However, over time the interaction with the local populations decreased as the level of violence increased, and the amenities on the airfield improved to include a cinema and a canteen. For many the only French that they came into contact with, albeit indirectly, were the authorities – military and political – who were doing their best to reimpose colonial control. In these heightened circumstances their actions were, at times, heavy handed.

At RAF Tan Son Nhut, a symbol of this was the saga of the flagpole on the terminal building. When the French Air Force returned to the station, they insisted on taking the Union Flag down from the flagpole and putting up the French Tricolour. The author’s source, who claimed to have had nothing to do with the episode, yet was strangely well-informed, recalled the consensus among the RAF staff was: ‘…that was an obvious insult, wasn’t it?’ So, at night, the Tricolour mysteriously disappeared and the British flag went back up. The French insisted the flags be swapped again, and they were. This time a group of RAF personnel, who had carefully worked out that the flagpole outside the Governor’s Palace in Saigon was the tallest in the country, ‘borrowed’ the pole and placed it next to the existing one on the terminal. Come dawn, there was the British flag alongside but above the tricolour. In fairness to the French, no effort was made to remove the new pole even though they were clearly less than impressed. The local RAF opinion was that, as a consequence, the French suffered something of a ‘sense of humour failure’.

Tight Rules of Engagement

At the end of 1945, RAF operations began to wind down. Their surveys finished, 684 Sqn withdrew their Mosquito detachment in January, 1946, moving it to Bangkok. Gremlin Task Force supported this move as one of their last tasks, standing down soon afterwards after having clocked up over 2,000 sorties.

The main terminal building at RAF Tan Son Nhut. Note the two flagpoles…

Partly this was a logical progression as the French strength in Indo China grew, but it was also due to an increasing shortage of spares for the Japanese aircraft. On the other hand, 273 Sqn were notified they would be disbanded at the end of that month. In mid-January, the first personnel were being withdrawn to Burma, and on 31 January the squadron stood down. Two weeks later RAF Saigon was also closed, although a small staging post remained at Tan Son Nhut.

The control tower at RAF Tan Son Nhut.

The RAF contribution to the liberation and re-colonisation of French Indochina had been small but important. It had also been shackled by tight rules of engagement and other limitations imposed by the French, Americans and by the British themselves. While this may have been frustrating at times, particularly to the Spitfire pilots, it did at least keep Britain largely disengaged from the problems within the country, and avoided an escalation of involvement in a shooting-war that was none of their concern. Unlike other operations, such as that to liberate the Netherlands East Indies, the British were able to do their job and get out without getting bogged down.

The French and the Americans would not be so lucky. In that respect, Operation Masterdom was a complete success.

The British in Indonesia

A particularly bloody episode was had in the Dutch East Indies. Following the Japanese occupation of the Dutch colonies, a republican government was installed, this government did not desire a Dutch return. However, the Dutch were keen to regain control, and despite a dislike of a European administered Far East, the US loaned $10m to the Dutch to facilitate their return. Weakened by German occupation, the Dutch had no real significant force until early 1946 and the British agreed, reluctantly, to administer the East Indies in their place.

British troops arrived in September 1945, tasked with restoring order and faced with the repatriation of some 300,000 Japanese as well having to free POWs. While clashes occurred, the British had not the will nor resources to commit to a long struggle to regain Indonesia for the Dutch. In October, the Japanese tried to regain the authority they relinquished to Indonesians. The cities of Pekalongan and Bandung were taken with ease, but Semarang was the scene of a bloody contest. By the time Japanese soldiers were repatriated, 500 Japanese and 2,000 Indonesians had been killed. A British led evacuation of Indo-Europeans and European internees followed as troops encountered stronger resistance. A brief ceasefire was arranged on 2 November 1945, but fighting soon resumed. Republican attacks against Allied and pro-Dutch civilians reached a peak in November and December, with 1,200 killed in Bandung alone.

The Battle of Surabaya would be bloodiest battle of the revolution. 6,000 British and Indian troops landed in the city and there was hand-to-hand fighting in every street. Thousands perished as the fighting continued until 29 November. Defeat at Surabaya permanently disadvantaged Republican forces, yet the battle galvanised support for independence and reminded the Dutch they faced a well-organised and popular resistance. On Java and Sumatra, the Dutch enjoyed success in urban areas, but could not subdue rural areas. On outer islands Republican sentiment was not as strong and they were occupied with ease. Indonesian independence would eventually be achieved in 1949. 5,000 Dutch would die in the campaign, as would tens of thousands of Indonesian combatants. Estimates of Indonesian civilian deaths vary between 25,000 and 100,000. The last British troops left Indonesia in November 1946 and in their shorter campaigns, 1,200 British and Indian soldiers would be killed, as would more than 1,000 Japanese.

Categories
All About Guns This great Nation & Its People War

M1 Garand Bucket List: Shoot The Legend BY Robert Sadowski

We walk the M1 Garand from history to the firing line, breaking down features, ammo picks, accuracy, and the unmistakable ping that made this WWII icon a must shoot.

M1 Garand rifle profile showing full length wood stock and 24 inch barrel

The M1 Garand was radical when it was adopted by the U.S. military in 1936. Every standing army around the globe in the 1930s was armed with manually operated bolt-action rifles; the Garand was a semi-automatic rifle.

The M1 Garand fired eight shots as quickly as the trigger was pressed at a rate of fire of 40 to 50 rounds per minute. At the start of World War II in 1939, it offered superior firepower over Germany’s slower-firing five-shot Mauser K98 bolt action and Japan’s five-shot Arisaka Type 99 bolt action rifle.

Perhaps the M1 Garand’s contribution to the war effort is best summed up by two of the U.S. military’s greatest generals during WWII. Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur said the “Garand rifle is one of the greatest contributions to our armed forces.” General George S. Patton is quoted as saying the M1 was “the greatest battle implement ever devised.” The M1 is legendary.

Why The M1 Garand Belongs On Your Bucket List

The M1 Garand has different meanings to people, depending on who you are, and since some 6.5 million were produced, that equates to a lot of different meanings. For the Greatest Generation and those few remaining veterans of World War II and those veterans of the Korean War, the Garand is a respected weapon spoken with reverence.

The legacy of this combat rifle spans over 80 years, from the beaches of Normandy during World War II to Pork Chop Hill in the Korean War. For shooters who shoot competitive service rifle matches, the M1 is a tool they use to hit a 3-inch bullseye at 200 yards with open sights. Collectors of the M1 Garand covet the history of the rifles.

M1 Garand right side view showing reciprocating charging handle and rotating bolt
The M1 is an easy-to-operate rifle. It uses a reciprocating charging handle and rotating bolt.

My connection to the M1 Garand takes a lot of different routes, from an uncle who was on Iwo Jima in 1945. He saw a lot of M1s used on that tiny island. A shooting pal who runs a D Day Match in early June at a local rod and gun club. He will let you borrow his rifle, show you how to load it without getting Garand Thumb, and how to shoot. He feels it is important to keep the legacy of the M1 alive. Another pal has a collection of 23 Garands and can tell you in excruciating detail the difference between each rifle, even though they all look the same to me. Another connection with the M1 Garand actually started in Jewett City, Connecticut, a rundown former mill town where I attended grammar school. All the textile mills had left by my time, but in the early 1900s, the town hummed with machines, and that is where John Garand, the inventor of the M1 Garand, combined his love of machinery and shooting. What is your connection to the M1 Garand?

US GI with M1 Garand in the Pacific theater during World War II
The M1 Garand replaced the M1903 Springfield bolt-action rifle and was used by every branch of the U.S. military during World War II and during the Korean War.

Key Features Of The M1 Garand

The M1 Garand uses a gas-operated, long-stroke piston system. The rifle’s mechanism cycles when expanding gases from a fired cartridge travel through the port and into a gas cylinder holding the long stroke piston. This system is still in use today in M14 rifles and variants, as well as AK-47 and AK-74 pattern rifles.

M1 Garand internal box magazine and en bloc clip system
An internal box magazine is used on the M1 Garand. A clip is used to load cartridges into the rifle.

The rifle weighed about 10 pounds and was 43.5 inches long. The stock was wood, which was the typical material used for stocks in the mid-20th century. The 24-inch barrel generated a muzzle velocity of about 2800 fps with the 152-grain M2 wartime ammo. A well-trained soldier averaged about 45 accurate shots per minute at a range of 300 yards.

Rear sight on an M1 Garand with windage and elevation adjustments
The rear sight on an M1 Garand is adjustable for windage and elevation.
Front sight on M1 Garand showing wing protected post
The front sight on M1 Garand is a post protected by wings.

The Garand incorporates an en bloc clip that holds eight cartridges, which was a radical departure for combat rifles of the time. This clip allowed a soldier to quickly and efficiently load the M1 by locking back the operating handle and pushing the clip into the M1’s internal magazine.

At the time, the U.S. military believed detachable box magazines were a bad idea. Magazines were not thought of as a disposable commodity as they are today. When the last round is fired, the M1 Garand ejects the clip with a characteristic metallic pinging noise.

A myth was that enemy soldiers waited for the ping to take advantage of GIs reloading their M1s. After WWII, soldiers on both sides were interviewed about the ping sound. Both sides said the chaos of battle was the only sound they heard.

Eight round en bloc clip for the M1 Garand with .30-06 cartridges
This is a clip that holds the cartridges in an M1.

While the clip idea was fast, it was not perfect. The M1 magazine and clip system did not allow soldiers to top off the magazine. A button on the left side of the rifle allowed a clip to be ejected.

M1 Garand with bolt locked back ready to accept an en bloc clip
With the bolt locked back, this M1 Garand is ready to be loaded with a clip.

The rear sight of the M1 was a fully adjustable aperture sight. The front sight was a post protected by wings.

Left side of M1 Garand showing clip eject button with bolt locked back
That button allows the clip to be ejected when the bolt is locked back.

What Rifle Did The U.S. Army Use In WWII?

With over a decade of design work and prototyping, the M1 was finally patented in 1934. In 1936, the rifle was adopted by the U.S. military and officially designated: Rifle, Caliber .30, M1.

The M1 Garand replaced the M1903 Springfield bolt-action rifle and was used by every branch of the U.S. military during World War II. During the Korean War, the U.S. government contracted for more rifles in the early 1950s. In 1958, the M1 was replaced by the select-fire M14 rifle.

World War II GIs in foxholes with M1 Garand rifles at the ready
GIs in foxholes during World War II with M1 Garands at the ready.

What Caliber Was The M1 Garand Chambered In?

Part of the M1’s enduring legacy is the rifle’s caliber, the .30 06 Springfield cartridge. In 1938, the .30 caliber, M2 cartridge was developed using a 152 grain flat-based FMJ bullet with a muzzle velocity of 2,800 fps. Veterans of WWI were familiar with the caliber, and like other military calibers, it found its way into hunt camps, becoming the de facto caliber by which all other American hunting calibers were benchmarked. To this day, the .30 06 Springfield is still a popular and enduring hunting cartridge.

What Is Garand Thumb?

When loading a Garand, remember to fully lock the bolt rearward. If you do not, the bolt will slam forward, trapping your thumb between the bolt and the chamber as you seat the clip. That is called Garand Thumb. Trust me, if this happens once, you will soon learn to load the M1 correctly.

How to load an M1 Garand with the bolt locked back and clip pressed into the magazine
To load an M1 Garand, lock the bolt back and press the 8-round clip into the magazine.

Who Made The M1 Garand?

During WWII, the Garand was manufactured by Winchester (WRA) and Springfield Armory (SA), the actual U.S. military armory, not Springfield Armory, the commercial firearm manufacturer. Springfield Armory was the first to start producing rifles and cranked out 100 rifles a day. Winchester followed.

In the 1950s, with the Korean War raging, the U.S. military contracted International Harvester Company (IHC) and Harrington & Richardson Arms Company (HRA) to produce Garands. There have been some commercially made M1s, and those were produced by Springfield Armory, the commercial firearm manufacturer.

M1 Garand safety lever located at the front of the trigger guard in the on position
The manual safety is that flat blade in the front of the trigger guard. In this position, the safety is on.

How Accurate Are M1 Garands?

The accuracy of a surplus M1 is dependent on the condition of the rifle, the quality of the barrel, and, of course, a shooter’s ability. My expectation with my M1 was 3 to 4 MOA. The bore looked good, but that does not mean a thing. Stocks can contract and interfere with the harmonics of a barrel. A fiberglass bedded receiver and quality barrel can greatly improve the accuracy in these old war horses with accuracy of 1 MOA or even better.

Five shot 100 yard group from an M1 Garand with Federal American Eagle ammo measuring 2.82 inches
This M1 gave up a best 5-shot group at 100 yards with Federal American Eagle that measured 2.82 inches. I will take that especially with open sights.

What Is The Best Ammo For M1 Garands?

While in service, the M1 Garands ran on 150-grain FMJ M2 Ball ammo with a muzzle velocity of about 2800 fps. Federal American Eagle .30 06 Springfield ammunition is designed to a similar spec and pushes a 150 grain FMJ at 2740 fps.

Hornady’s Vintage Match ammo is also a safe choice. It loads a 168-grain ELD bullet with a 2710 fps muzzle velocity. Be aware of .30 06 ammunition with heavier bullets and higher muzzle velocities. They will fire in a surplus M1, but they can harm an M1’s gas piston system and can bend the operating rods. I use 150-grain FMJ ammo with a muzzle velocity of 2700 fps.

Boxes of .30-06 Springfield ammo suitable for the M1 Garand including Federal American Eagle
A good ammo option for the M1 Garand is Federal American Eagle .30 06 Springfield ammunition designed to a similar spec and pushes a 150 grain FMJ at 2740 fps.

Shooting The M1 Garand

Wrapping yourself in the Garand’s sling, you get the real shooting experience. The heft of the rifle alleviates felt recoil. From the two-stage trigger that allows you to pre-load the trigger for the shot to the break, you instantly find that the M1 is willing to please.

When the mechanism operates, there is a lot of movement and sound. After eight shots, the ping sound of the ejected clip is obvious. From sandbags, my old war horse still has game. My best 5-shot group at 100 yards with Federal American Eagle measured 2.82 inches. I will take that especially with open sights.

Shooter wrapped into M1 Garand sling firing from supported position
Wrapping yourself in the Garand’s sling, you get the real shooting experience.

Collecting M1 Garands

Most M1 Garands are arsenal rebuilds and may have mixed parts. An M1 with all original parts, or at least most of them, is rare and will fetch top dollar. Things to look for in an M1 are inspector cartouches and proof marks that match the original manufacturer.

Many rifles have been refinished. The barrel throat is usually given as an indication of wear. The throat refers to the area where the lands of the rifling start at the breech end of the barrel. The higher the number, the more wear.

The Civilian Marksmanship Program (CMP) rebuilds and sells M1 Garands by grade. A number of collector websites provide serial number lookup to determine the year the rifle was produced.

Conclusion: The Ping That Echoes

It is hard to believe, but the weapons used during World War II started with bayonets and bolt-action rifles and ended with assault rifles and atomic bombs.

By the end of WWII, the M1 Garand was dated. It was long, heavy, and the caliber was too powerful for full automatic fire. Any shooter’s bucket list should include trigger time with M1 Garand. It is not a perfect weapon, but the rifle is woven into the fabric of our nation. There are millions of M1 Garands. This one is mine.

M1 Garand Specifications

Model M1 Garand (Rifle, Caliber .30, M1)
Action 8-round en bloc clip
Caliber .30 06 Springfield (7.62x63mm)
Finish Parkerized
Shoulder Stock Walnut with steel butt plate
Front Sight Fixed, wing protected
Rear Sight Adjustable aperture
Barrel Length 24 in.
Overall Length 43.5 in.
Weight 10 lbs.
Capacity 8 round en bloc clip