Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic!

French Gun Control Failed, Leaving Law-Abiding Citizens Helpless As Nation Burned BY TYLER DURDEN

Submitted by Aidan Johnston, federal affairs director for Gun Owners of America

In case you missed it, France entered into a pseudo-civil war this past weekend. Rioters took to the streets, destroyed billions of dollars in local property, violent criminals pulled out their illegal guns, and there was nothing the average disarmed Frenchman could do about it.

These recent riots proved the old adage, “When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.”

France has much stricter gun laws than anywhere in the United States. French citizens do not have the individual right to bear arms, nor carry a firearm in public for self-defense. Instead, they have strict regulations for anyone that does want to keep a firearm at home:

  • limits on the type and amount of guns and ammo you can own; 
  • universal background checks; and 
  • gun registration. 

Nevertheless, what began in France as mostly peaceful protests would end with fully automatic weapons and banned “weapons of war” being used to terrorize the streets of France.

Protesters started by burning cars, starting fires, and shooting off fireworks, but soon began using shotguns to shoot out police cameras.

Criminals soon brought out the bigger guns—semiautomatic AK-style firearms. Video footage revealed the criminals shooting directly into the air in the city center—endangering the surrounding area.

Shortly after that, footage surfaced online of protestors with handguns and belt-fed machine guns marching down the street in broad daylight. Terrorized citizens ran and screamed as security alarms blared.

Meanwhile, average French citizens attempted to stand up to the rioters with wooden bats and other improvised weaponry.

France’s gun control did nothing to protect its people.

Criminals dominated the streets. In this short period of civil unrest, thousands were arrested, and more than a billion dollars of damage was done to local businesses—which doesn’t even include schools, town halls, or community centers.

These rioters didn’t care for France’s gun laws. They had illegal firearms—such as banned, fully-automatic belt-fed machine guns.

They took those illegal firearms and shot them in public to wreak havoc—without regard for France’s ban on the public carry of firearms or the safety of the general public.

While armed criminals ignored French gun laws and destroyed cities, Florida’s permitless concealed carry law went into effect.

Anti-gun advocates decried Florida for becoming a “more dangerous state.” Yet, Florida celebrated the weekend in peace while gun-controlled France burned.

The Founding Fathers fostered our well-armed society “for the security of [our] free state.” In other words, the individual Second Amendment right is protected for the common good and helps us keep ourselves, our loved ones, and our nation safe.

For example, during the race riots in Los Angeles, local Korean business owners stood up to criminals by arming their employees and guarding their neighborhoods from the rooftops.

Again, during riots in Kenosha, Wisconsin, locals like Kyle Rittenhouse used firearms to patrol local communities, put out fires, offer first aid, and defend themselves from violent criminals.

In the United States, our Second Amendment empowers citizens with the means to stand up to tyranny—whether by an oppressive government, a violent criminal, or a roving gang of bandits during civil unrest.

France’s example has proven that gun control only affects law-abiding citizens.

Criminals won’t give up their guns no matter what gun restrictions the government enacts, and the Second Amendment says that the People shouldn’t have to give up their guns either.

We refuse to sit idly by while bureaucrats or legislators enact “feel good” measures that disarm you and leave you searching for improvised weapons during the next wave of riots.

*   *   *

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic!

Dems eye suburban women to garner Republican support for new gun reform by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is leading the pack of rabid Democrats prepping to take another stab at passing gun control legislation with the help of suburban women and, believe it or not, Republicans.

Citing mass shootings with no context as to why they are happening, Schumer and the Left continue screaming that something has to be done and that gun rights must be taken away from Americans in the name of safety.

The Hill seems to be in step with the Left on pushing for more gun control, reporting, “At least 10 people were killed in separate shootings in Baltimore, Fort Worth, and Philadelphia over the weekend and July 4, while shootings in Lansing, Mich., and Wichita, Kan., left dozens more injured. The Gun Violence Archive has counted 20 mass shootings across the nation since July 1, leaving 19 people dead and more than 100 injured.”

In the wake of passing gun control measures a year ago, it was, of course, not enough. Now the Left wants further steps taken, Constitution be damned.

 

“Leader Schumer was proud to have passed a significant bipartisan gun safety bill through the Senate last summer but more must be done. Schumer continues to work with his caucus to find a path forward that can garner enough Republican support and combat the scourge of gun violence, save lives, and bring meaningful change,” Schumer spokesperson Allison Biasotti declared.

Despite the incessant screeching, tearing of hair, and rending of clothes, the prospects for yet mreo gun control are dim, thankfully. However, in an ominous sign, things may be shifting.

Former Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.) claims the political dynamic concerning gun control is beginning to shift among GOP voters.

“It’s clear from today’s data — especially the growing incidence of mass shooting events involving high-capacity magazines and assault weapons — that it’s time to consider policy changes,” Frist, sounding more Democrat than Republican, wrote in an op-ed for Forbes where he called for a federal assault weapons ban and expanding background checks for all firearms purchases.

Frist has been beating the gun control drum for a while now.

 

Then Frist went to The Hill to do an interview claiming that Republican voters’ views of gun control are changing.

“Something is changing over the last three years compared to 20 years ago when I was here. There is a willingness to have civil discussions on what have been highly contentious issues that I didn’t see 15 years ago,” he asserted. “More needs to be done on gun safety today. Something more needs to be done because the overall governance of gun safety is outdated and it’s incomplete.”

The Hill dug up a poll in early May by “All In Together,” a nonprofit women’s civic education group, and “Echelon Insights,” a GOP polling firm, to cite that suburban voters support tougher gun laws. The polling venues appear to be leftist in nature despite the hyping of “Echelon Insights” being a GOP polling firm.

To many, the results do not sound conservative in the least and stretch credibility.

 

“Forty-two percent of independent women voters said a candidate needed to share their view on guns to get their vote, rating the issue as important as a candidate’s view on abortion and the cost of living,” The Hill reported.

“The poll of 1,227 likely voters also showed that 61 percent of Republican women support restricting the ability to purchase certain types of guns — a far higher percentage than the 41 percent of Republican men who feel that way,” the media outlet continued.

The saving grace here is that so far, discharge petitions to push gun control bills through the House are going nowhere fast. Instead, Democrats are likely to start in the Senate with the push. But it will most likely be dead on arrival in the House.

“Leader Schumer called a special caucus meeting last month solely dedicated to combatting gun violence which produced many good ideas. Now, we’re determining the best path forward that could garner enough Republican support,” a Senate Democratic aide said, according to The Hill.

 

Minority Senate Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is a weak link in the chain. Fifteen Republicans last year supported the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act, including McConnell.

“That is one of the absolute critical reasons for why we have seen this issue change,” Christian Heyne, vice president of policy at Brady Campaign, said. “Suburban women are not only wildly supportive of gun violence prevention policies but we’ve seen numbers that it’s a huge motivator to bring people to the polls. It’s why the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act had such overwhelming majority support.”

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), who played a leading role in negotiating last year’s gun violence legislation, bluntly contends that an assault weapons ban has no chance of passing Congress.

“I don’t think that’s going to happen. And, truthfully, the so-called assault weapons ban — what are they going to do about the millions of semi-automatic rifles that are already out there? I don’t think a prospective ban will have any of the intended effect of the proponents,” he remarked. “Basically what they’re advocating for is confiscation from law-abiding citizens. I’m willing to look at whatever the proposal is but I’m not willing to erode the rights of law-abiding citizens.”

 

Unbelievably, Frist told The Hill that “a majority of Republicans” support improved “gun safety.”

“It really is having people own guns if they want them and be able to do it in a way that is safe and secure,” he declared.

“The visibility with the increase in shootings, the lethality of the incidents that happen, the numbers of people [killed or injured] make it a real teaching point,” Frist claimed.

Categories
Born again Cynic! The Green Machine You have to be kidding, right!?!

Recruiters celebrate Supreme Court striking down college loan cancellation by Paul Szoldra

Back gate auto dealers anticipate used Dodge Charger demand increase

Receiving should be fun

STRIP MALLS IN BAD PARTS OF TOWN, U.S.A. — The sounds of champagne bottles popping echoed through recruitment centers over the weekend as recruiters celebrated the news that the Supreme Court blocked President Joe Biden’s attempts to cancel college loans.

“Man, what a huge relief it is for us, the nation’s military recruiters, to know that people who took on crippling predatory loans in search of making better lives through education for themselves and their offspring may still have to turn to us for relief,” said Army Master Sergeant Kim Babcock.

On a 6-3 vote along ideological lines, the Supreme Court ruled that the Executive Branch had no standing to cancel the debt of 40 million borrowers.

“The good news is that we now have a list of 40 million Americans who thought for a few years that they wouldn’t have these massive, interest-bearing debts to pay off. Jackpot!” shouted Air Force Tech Sergeant James Tchaikovsky.

Categories
Born again Cynic! Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom

American History’s Biggest Fibs | BBC Select

https://youtu.be/Xt7ag4vT2O0

Categories
Being a Stranger in a very Strange Land Born again Cynic! Well I thought it was funny!

Okay, Okay but I thought it was amusing!

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! Cops Paint me surprised by this

FIREARMS INDUSTRY REACTS TO HUNTER BIDEN GUN CRIMES DEAL WRITTEN BY HANDGUNNER STAFF

“DO AS WE SAY, NOT AS WE DO”

In a world in which politicians would like the American public to believe no one is above the law, the government has once again demonstrated justice is not equitable, and leaders throughout the firearms industry are calling them out on it.

On Tuesday, it was announced the Department of Justice (DOJ) reached a plea agreement with Hunter Biden, son of President Joe Biden, to avoid prosecution for illegally possessing a firearm as an admitted drug user.

Hunter Biden’s plea agreement to misdemeanor tax offenses allows him to avoid federal felony charges for lying on a background check form when he purchased a firearm. Hunter Biden was an illegal user of crack cocaine at the time, which made him ineligible to legally purchase or possess a firearm.

The punishment for the felony offense of lying on the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) Form 4473 is up to 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Not to mention, the firearm Hunter Biden purchased was later disposed of in a public trash can.

In a statement released by the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), the organization criticizes the agreement as it comes at the same time the Biden administration is punishing firearm retailers by revoking licenses and terminating livelihoods for minor clerical errors with its “zero-tolerance” policy.

“Under this administration’s ‘zero tolerance’ policy, licensed firearm retailers have had their lives destroyed for paperwork mistakes far less egregious than buying a gun when you are a crack addict,” said Lawrence G. Keane, NSSF’s Senior Vice President and General Counsel. “They are not serious about reducing gun violence, only scoring cheap political points. It is worth noting this announcement came today, after President Biden’s appearance in Hartford last Friday to call for gun control.”

During the appearance, President Biden once again called on Congress to pass unconstitutional gun control measures that would ban an entire class of commonly-owned semiautomatic rifles and allow for suing members of the firearm industry.

The Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms released a statement in response calling the deal “an insult to the intelligence of the American people.”

“Why should anybody respect any gun laws if the president’s son gets a pass,” CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb questioned. “The American public should be outraged at what amounts to a deplorable double standard.

“It is important to note that none of the gun prohibition lobbying groups have uttered a word of condemnation,” he continued. “This fact alone shows what hypocrites they are, and what a hypocrite Joe Biden is. Their silence is deafening.”

Gottlieb noted how President Biden has spent his entire political career campaigning for strict gun control, including bans on so-called “assault weapons” and more recently, an acknowledged effort to prevent the sale of 9mm pistols. But the rules evidently change when the president’s son is involved in a federal gun crime that would result in fines and imprisonment for up to 10 years for anybody else who knowingly lied about not being a prohibited person, to obtain a handgun.

“If Joe Biden wasn’t president,” Gottlieb said, “Hunter Biden would be heading to jail. Looks like the biggest loophole of them all is to violate a federal gun law when you’re the president’s son.”

The CCRKBA chairman also said the gun ban lobby’s silence on this case should erase any influence they have on the nation’s gun law policies.

“The anti-gun-rights movement, from Joe Biden on down through all of the billionaire-backed gun control groups have just lost whatever credibility they ever had, and ever will have, by not immediately denouncing this deal,” Gottlieb stated. “These elitist anti-gunners must never again be taken seriously by the public, the media or members of Congress and state legislatures when they advocate for tougher gun laws, while remaining silent about the Biden gun crime loophole.”

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Born again Cynic! California Cops You have to be kidding, right!?!

Bank of America Turns Over Information on Gun Owners to the FBI by John Crump

Bank of America Turns Over Information on Gun Owners to the FBI iStock-471503379
Bank of America Turns Over Information on Gun Owners to the FBI, iStock-471503379

WASHINGTON, D.C. — FBI whistleblowers have come forward with damning allegations against Bank of America (BoA). According to Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), the banking giant has been revealing information to the FBI about its customer’s gun purchases without a warrant. Now the pair has sent letters to other banks to see if they also violated the privacy rights of their customers.

After the protest at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, Bank of America provided the FBI with a list of customers who made transactions in or around Washington, D.C., purchased a flight to the Nation’s Capital, or booked a hotel room in the Washington D.C. metropolitan area. Most of Bank of America’s customers that attended the large rally never entered the Capitol Building, and the FBI did not have probable cause to allow the law enforcement agency to get a court order for the bank to surrender the documents.

When the FBI approached BoA about turning over the records, the bank complied without requesting a court order.

The megabank would put anyone in or around D.C. and purchase a gun on the top of the list. By simply being in or around D.C. on January 6 and purchasing a firearm using a BoA product, the FBI would mark you for investigation. The FBI investigated many BoA customers without a court order and with the full cooperation of Bank of America.

“In a transcribed interview, retired FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst George Hill testified that BoA, ‘with no directive from the FBI, data-mined its customer base’ and compiled a list of BoA customers who used a BoA product during a specified date range. Mr. Hill further noted that ‘on top of that list, they put anyone who had purchased a firearm during any date.’ Mr. Hill also testified that the list that BoA provided targeted transactions in Washington D.C., and the surrounding area,” the letter reads.

The letter was sent to JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup, Truist Financial Corporation, Wells Fargo, U.S. Bancorp, and PNC Financial Services. The Congressmen are asking the banks to provide any documents or communications about the release of customer data from the January 6, 2021, timeframe to the FBI or any other federal law enforcement agencies.

This request is to see if the other major banks of similar size leaked the same customer information to the federal authorities that Bank of America released.

“Congress has an important interest in ensuring that Americans’ private information is protected from collection by federal law enforcement agencies without proper due process. The Committee and Select Subcommittee must understand if, how, and to what extent financial institutions, including PNC Financial Services, worked with the FBI to collect Americans’ private data,” the letter reads.

Many are concerned that the FBI is becoming overtly political and weaponized against anyone the Biden regime considers enemies. We have seen the weaponization of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) against conservative non-profits. The FBI has also used documents like the discredited “Steele Dossier” to get FISA warrants to surveil political opponents. Some of those concerned about the weaponization of government agencies are serving in Congress.

It should concern all Americans (not only gun owners) that big business is working hand and hand with big government. Instead of protecting its customers’ data, it turns it over to the surveillance state without a fight. Gun owners now know that Bank of America is not protecting their data from an ever-encroaching government. The only question now is how far the rot goes.


About John Crump

John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.

John Crump

Categories
All About Guns Born again Cynic! Cops

Nine people shot as Denver Nuggets win NBA title and riot police try to control crowds

DENVER (KDVR) — Multiple shootings sent 11 people to the hospital early Tuesday morning after thousands flocked downtown in celebration of the Denver Nuggets’ historic NBA Finals win, celebrating into the early morning hours.

Just before 1 a.m., the Denver Police Department tweeted that they were investigating a shooting in the 2000 block of Market Street.

DPD said nine gunshot victims were located and that they identified a suspect who also had a gunshot wound.

Three victims were in critical condition at a local hospital, and the other victims appeared to have non-life-threatening injuries, according to DPD.

At around 1:11 a.m., DPD said they were investigating a shooting in an area where one person was shot. However, officers provided an update that the victim was actually shot in a different location and self-transported to the hospital.

In total, 10 people were injured in the 2000 block of Market Street, which is next to Coors Field.

DPD said this shooting is complex and the investigation is in its early stages. Early information suggests that multiple shots were fired during an altercation that involved several people.

Around 11:50 p.m. Monday, DPD said they were also investigating a shooting in an area a block away from the 16th Street Mall and several downtown hotels.

One person was taken to a local hospital, but their injuries were not immediately known.

Officers were working to obtain suspect information.

Aaaaand Its Gone Meme - Imgflip

Categories
Born again Cynic! California You have to be kidding, right!?!

California Takes a Big Step Towards Legalizing Shoplifting BY STEPHEN GREEN

California Takes a Big Step Towards Legalizing Shoplifting
San Francisco Financial District. (Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0.)
If California isn’t already the nation’s shoplifting leader, it soon will be if State Senator Dave Cortese’s SB 553 becomes law, according to some retailers. The bill just passed the state Senate and now moves over to the Assembly.

Ostensibly aimed at curbing workplace violence — a nice way of saying “criminals who come in to steal stuff and create the conditions for violence” — California Retailers Association chief Rachel Michelin described the bill in harsh terms. “It says no employee can approach someone who is shoplifting. So even if someone is trained on how to deter someone from doing that, now they’re not allowed to approach someone. So, what does that mean?”

“We are opening up the door to allow people to walk into stores, steal and walk out,” she said.

Cortese, a Democrat, says that “We don’t want rank-and-file employees to be forced to place themselves in harm’s way,” something that Michelin says employers aren’t doing anyway.

What SB 553 looks like to me is more virtue signaling, enshrined into law, that California now turns a blind eye to shoplifting. That’s certainly the way criminals will read it.

Meanwhile, over at the San Francisco Standard, they’re all a flutter over when the new downtown Ikea will finally open. There are signs of life at the construction site, “potentially signaling the company’s commitment to opening its Market Street store this year.” The bright blue and yellow store sign is posted and lit, and there are bare shelves in place, waiting to be stocked.

But maybe the question that San Francisco shoppers should ask isn’t when the new Ikea will open, but how long before corporate is forced to close it.

Downtown San Francisco has some of the priciest real estate in the world but empty office buildings, rampant shoplifting, and other so-called “lifestyle crimes” have forced big-name retailers to abandon the area. A massive Whole Foods closed in April after just a year of being open, with employees having to call the police an average of 10 times every week. Two city Nordstrom locations will close this summer after the company decided not to renew their leases on Market Street and at the Westfield Mall. Saks Off Fifth is closing, as are H&M and Uniqlo. Walgreens has closed several locations around the city.

And that’s just in San Francisco, just in the last few months.

Democrats like to portray their soft stance on shoplifting as a reasonable measure: “You wouldn’t prosecute a starving man for stealing a loaf of bread, would you?”

But in San Francisco, for example, most of the shoplifting is done by well-organized theft rings operating out of neighboring Oakland. Criminals know the police won’t do anything because the district attorney won’t do anything. Now, if Senate Bill 553 passes the Assembly and earns Gov. Gavin Newsom’s slimy signature, not even store security staff will be allowed to do anything.

High-end retailers will continue to flee, and the grocery and convenience stores remaining will quickly move to a Soviet model of retailing. Customers will not be allowed past a heavily protected cash register. After they pay, a clerk will retrieve their goods for them and then pass them through the opening in a prison-like cage.

Remember when suburban and rural folks used to make special trips to the city just to do some shopping?

Good times, fading fast.

—————————————————————————–           Now call me silly or worse. But it seems to me that the State Legislature of California has a “few” other minor issues that could be looked at. Instead of pandering to the criminal class.

Like oh let us say, Tax Reform, Term Limits, Water issues, Homeless / Bums, Infrasturcture, Housing, Over crowding, Gun issues, Mental health, Traffic, Over regulation of everything, Anti business enviroment, locking up bad folks and throwing away the key. Or let say also fighting illegal immigation instead of incouraging it. But whom am I ? I am just a taxpayer who helps foot the bills. Grumpy

Categories
Born again Cynic! War You have to be kidding, right!?!

BELL’S AH-1 SUPERCOBRA, AND THE IRANIAN CONNECTION By Will Dabbs, MD

Human beings are tribal. No matter how advanced we or the Information Age trappings with which we adorn ourselves become, we simply cannot escape this most primal urge. Whether it’s driven by the clothes we wear, the language we speak or our zip code, homo sapiens will invariably seek out a tribe.

super cobra
The AH-1W SuperCobra was an extensively-upgraded version of the Vietnam-era gunship with new sensors, fresh weapons, and an upgraded powertrain. Image: NARA

In no place is this weird tenet more overtly manifest than in the military. I once saw a man die trying to earn the privilege of wearing a funny-looking hat. It’s indeed a strange old world.

super cobra attack helicopters
An AH-1 SuperCobra helicopter comes in to Landing Zone Bluebird during CAPEX ’92. Image: NARA

In the case of the U.S. military, we have the curious love/hate relationship manifest between the Army and Marine Corps. Each organization espouses unique strengths and weaknesses, and some of their turf overlaps. When overseen by the U.S. Congress, arguably the most dysfunctional group of humans ever to grace the earth, the results can seem nonsensical.

Dueling Gunships

The U.S. Army deployed the first AH-1G Cobra gunships to Vietnam in the summer of 1967. The Marines coveted these sexy beasts but were rightfully uncomfortable with the single-engine design given the amount of over-water flying they had to do. The Army transferred 38 single-engine Snakes to the Jarheads in 1969, but this was a stopgap measure at best.

ah-1w
An AH-1W SuperCobra helicopter takes off from Tallil Air Base, Iraq, during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Two U.S. Army CH-47 Chinook helicopters are visible in the background. Image: NARA

Now stick with me here. This is complicated. The Marines requested Snakes of their own, which they ultimately christened SeaCobras. At some point in production, Bell engineers fitted these Marine airframes with Pratt and Whitney T400-WV-402 Twin Pac engine units.

To accommodate the extra power produced by two engines, these upgraded gunships incorporated the transmission system taken from the commercial Bell 214. The main rotor and tail rotors both grew a bit as well, and there were some other minor upgrades.

These new versions were eventually designated the AH-1T. By the end of the Vietnam War, the Marine Corps had taken delivery of 49 twin-engine SeaCobras. These capable aircraft saw action at the very end of the conflict, providing air cover during the final evacuation of the US embassy in Saigon in 1975.

ah1 supercobra
A U.S. Marine Corps AH-1W SuperCobra fires rockets during an exercise at Chocolate Mountain Gunnery Range. Image: Lance Cpl. Jeremy L. Laboy/U.S.M.C.

The Marines’ twin-engine Snakes had a greater payload capacity than their single-engine brethren and were also more easily maintained in an austere environment. T-models had an extended fuselage, TOW missile capability, and advanced targeting systems. Eventually, Marine SeaCobras were fitted with the twin GE T700-GE-700 turboshaft engines designed for the AH-64 Apache and redesignated the AH-1T+. Unlike the previous Vietnam-era gunships that carried 40mm automatic grenade launchers and miniguns, the AH-1T sported a 3-barrel M-197 20mm Gatling gun in the chin turret.

The Shah’s Snakes

In 1971, the Iranians were our buddies. The Shah of Iran was a fairly bloodthirsty despot, but he was our bloodthirsty despot. Flush with cash and unencumbered by the fundamentalist Ayatollahs who run the place nowadays, in 1971 the Shah purchased 202 twin-engine AH-1J SeaCobras. The Iranians then proceeded to fly the heck out of those machines.

ah 1 w super cobra
A U.S. Marine Corps AH-1W SuperCobra attack helicopter flies over Florida during close-air support training on the massive live-fire ranges. Image: NARA

Most of the Iranian Cobra combat action took place against the Iraqis during that bloody seven-year war. Along the way, Iranian Snake drivers killed scads of Iraqi tanks with their TOW-armed gunships. They also scored air-to-air victories against Iraqi Mi-8 and Mi-24 helicopters. The Combloc Mi-24 was faster and more heavily armed, but the Cobra was much more nimble.

super cobra helicopters
A right-side view of a U.S. Marine AH-1 Cobra helicopter in flight during a training mission in 1986. Image: NARA

Though the numbers are impossible to verify, the Iranians claimed a 10-to-1 kill advantage for their Cobras over their rotary-wing opponents. There were even three confirmed kills by AH-1J pilots against MiG-21 Fishbed jet fighters. Iranian gunship pilots also claimed one Su-20 and the shared downing of a MiG-23. All of the fast-mover kills were the result of engagements with the 20mm M197 cannon.

marine cobra helicopter
U.S. Navy Sailor Lou Robinson guides an AH-1W SuperCobra attack helicopter onto a landing deck aboard the Baylander (IX-514) while underway in Pensacola Bay. Image: NARA

All the Iranian Cobras are simply worn out these days. Decades of sanctions choked off the supply of spare parts, while protracted combat operations just ground down the machines. Ali Akbar Shiroodi and Ahmad Kashvari are two Iranian Cobra jocks who are considered national heroes in Iran today.

The Next Generation

Back in the U.S., the Marines really wanted to replace their twin-engine Cobras with AH-64 Apaches. In 1981, the Leathernecks conducted an intensive two-week evaluation of the Army gunship only to have Congress deny funding for the new aircraft.

ah 1w super cobra helicopter
Lance Cpl. Matt Riddle guides an AH-1W SuperCobra after refueling at Jalibah Air Base, Iraq, in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom. Image: NARA

As a result, the Marines upgraded their old Cobras to carry Sidewinder air-to-air missiles as well as the AGM-114 laser-guided Hellfire antitank missile system. This upgraded version was redesignated the AH-1W SuperCobra. The Marines eventually fielded 179 newly-manufactured SuperCobras alongside 43 examples that were upgraded from previous AH-1T’s.