Category: Anti Civil Rights ideas & “Friends”

Categories
All About Guns Another potential ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California Cops EVIL MF

How California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Recent Major Court Losses Have Him Scrambling Mark Chesnut

In fact, after the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on July 24 that the state’s ammunition background check law violated the Second Amendment and affirmed a district court’s order granting a permanent injunction against enforcement of the law, Newsom shared some harsh words with the media.

“Strong gun laws save lives—and today’s decision is a slap in the face to the progress California has made in recent years to keep its communities safer from gun violence,” Newsom said in a released statement. “Californians voted to require background checks on ammunition, and their voices should matter.”

Newsom’s frustration isn’t just with the decision on ammo background checks, however. To be sure, Newsom’s and California’s anti-gun regime have seen plenty of court losses as of late, and they have been dealt with especially harshly by the 9th Circuit Court—historically a bastion of anti-gun advocacy—in recent weeks.

For one, on June 20, a three-judge panel of the 9th Circuit Court struck down the California law limiting firearm purchases to just one every 30 days. This gun-rationing scheme, the court said, not only violated the Second Amendment but had no historic precedent as required by the Bruen doctrine.

“The district court held that this law violates the Second Amendment. We affirm,” the 9th Circuit ruling stated. “California’s law is facially unconstitutional because possession of multiple firearms and the ability to acquire firearms through purchase without meaningful constraints are protected by the Second Amendment, and California’s law is not supported by our nation’s tradition of firearms regulation.”

Less than a month later, the 9th Circuit reversed a district court decision and upheld an earlier ruling that the Golden State’s law prohibiting advertising of any “firearm-related product in a manner that is designed, intended, or reasonably appears to be attractive to minors” is also unconstitutional.

In Other NEWS

“California has many tools to address unlawful firearm use and violence among the state’s youth,” the ruling stated. “But it cannot ban truthful ads about lawful firearm use among adults and minors unless it can show that such an intrusion into the First Amendment will significantly further the state’s interest in curtailing unlawful and violent use of firearms by minors.”

Note that the big losses haven’t just been in the 9th Circuit Court, but also at the district court level. On July 1, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ruled that the state’s law banning nonresident carry permits is unconstitutional.

“Although California identifies a regulatory burden from potentially tens of thousands of new applications, the constitutional infringement pushes the balance of equities in Plaintiffs’ favor,” the ruling stated.

Ultimately, his recent court losses might have something to do with Newsom’s recent lie proclaiming he’s now a Second Amendment advocate.

“I’m not anti-gun at all,” Newsom said at the time. “I’m for just some gun safety common sense. I’m challenged by large-capacity magazine clips in urban centers, weapons of war sometimes outgunning the police. But otherwise, man, people have the right to bear arms, and I’ve got no ideological opposition to that at all.”

Hopefully, pretending not to be anti-gun made him feel a little better about all the bad beatings he’s been taking in court recently. He’s going to need it, as more lawsuits in the pipeline will continue to dismantle the state’s tangle of anti-gun laws.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

ATF Hates This One Trick to Get a Short Barreled Shotgun!

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California

BREAKING: California’s Gun Law Just Got EXPOSED in Court – You Won’t Believe What Happened!

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Delaware: Gov. Carney Signs Anti-Gun Bills & General Assembly Adjourns

Delaware: Gov. Carney Signs Anti-Gun Bills & General Assembly Adjourns

Yesterday, Governor John Carney signed all of the anti-gun bills that the General Assembly sent to his desk. This surprised no one, as he announced his support for these schemes early on. They include a ban on many commonly-owned firearms, a ban on many standard-capacity magazines, discriminating against young adults, and allowing lawsuits to bankrupt the firearm industry regardless of whether there is a violation of the law. To read more about the bills that were signed, click here and here.

We thank all of the NRA members and Second Amendment supporters who came together to repeatedly express their opposition to their elected officials throughout the whole legislative process. Though the anti-gun majorities in the General Assembly were determined to pass these bills from the start, this opposition helped amend some of the bills to alleviate the impact on law-abiding citizens.

The General Assembly has adjourned. NRA will be back in Dover for the 2023 legislative session. In the meantime, please stay tuned to www.nraila.org and your email inbox.

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Being a Stranger in a very Strange Land

Now I debated on wither or not to post this. But I decided that it was worth sharing – Epic Rant I saw on Farcebook

I posted this a while back and now I can just smile while old age & death are becoming a close friends of mine.

As we got the bastards on the run! So when are we going to fire up the helicopters? Grumpy

I saw this rant from some one on Farcebook and it was an epic rant and I can’t locate the owner to give the props.  This statue is a statue of Robert E Lee.  I have a quick post of U.S Grant that we had discussed a couple days ago that I will put up in a couple of days.

“Some of you have done NOTHING with your life and you’re mad. You have a college degree & a smart phone with access to virtually *anything* and you can barely get out of bed in the morning while you spit on people who built a whole world with nothing but a horse, map, & axe.

You’ve made nothing with access to everything. You’ve conquered nothing. Hell you can’t even conquer yourself. So go tear it all down. Scream into the void how unfair it all is. It’s not that you’ve wasted your short time here. Surely not. Don’t bother with your own legacy you’re busy shitting on the long dead who aren’t here to care. Go burn down every Starbucks. That’ll show them. Torch the Target. Tear down every monument. Deface every memorial.

But what have you built? What do you leave behind? So take your benzos. Watch your porn. Get Uber to drop off your dinner. Buy an adult coloring book. Have sex with strangers to ease your crippling anxiety. It’s not you. It’s the system really. It isn’t fair. Go cancel someone. Dox someone. They deserve it. You’re the good guy. Don’t write an epic novel worth building a statue to remember you.

Go troll seven year old problematic tweets ever on the hunt for the boogeymen. See now you’ve accomplished something. Cancel everyone. You’re a warrior now. A real hero. And lastly whatever you do never ever take even a moment to self reflect on your own failures. Never own them. Never take a hint of responsibility. Remember you’re just a helpless victim of circumstances beyond your control. This all means nothing. Its like you weren’t even here.”

 Apparently I and people like me are “dinosaurs” and she and her”allies” are wanting me and mine to hurry up and “die” or they will encourage us into the boxcars for the gulag ride to the “reeducation camps” to either be re educated or die” for our new overlords” 

I guess that is their plan…….Well I really don’t see that happening. 

Another point, You see her and the soy boy next to her smiling, they thing that they will be pardoned by the new overlords because they were such “good allies”  shoot, they will find themselves along with the other palefaces off to the gulags for “re-education and death like the other dinosaurs to the great plan” and the fact that they are woke ain’t going to matter .  stupid idiots. 

Somehow they think that we dinosaurs will just roll along with the great plan to fade away, the problem is that we are getting pretty pissed and they want to keep playing games and to us in middle America, we keep seeing our ways under attack, our traditions under attack, who we are under attack and they keep pushing and it will come to a point and one day…

One day the folks we will just get tired of the incessant pushing, insults, assaults, murders, and the government doing nothing, but mouthing platitudes and being impotent,and allowing the left to run amuck, but charge anybody from the conservative side and you wonder if the government supports the riots and the protestors and we will realize the age of the vigilante is back and it will be on like donkey Kong. 

Do I want to see it…..No…but do I fear it will happen….possible if the left keep pushing like they do, the people on the right will get tired, if it and it will be on.  You will have the media clutching at pearls right now, but if someone on the right does something, the media will condemn them whereas they have not condemned the fruitcakes on the left for the same behavior first. 

And most people on the right will see the double standard of the media and tune them out and the media will lose even more credibility.

 I normally take “infowars” with a huge grains of salt but Matt Bracken did a great job explaining how Antifa operates and how they work the riots and chaos and how they formed up from the initial training and more training.  the video is 48 minutes long and well worth the watch and explains how they operate and overwhelm the police and cause the destruction they do.  Also he explains what most likely will happen next.

I stole this from My Daily Kona – Thanks by the way as you have a great Blog! Grumpy

Categories
Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Martial Law in Mascara: How FDR Hijacked the Constitution and No One Told You The Constitution wasn’t suspended—it was sidelined, buried under emergency powers, executive orders, and fear, while Americans barely noticed the quiet coup. By Maureen Steele

Let’s get this out of the way first. No, the Constitution wasn’t officially suspended in 1933. But it was gagged, blindfolded, and tied to a chair while the federal government handed itself sweeping emergency powers and redefined “freedom” into a kind of bureaucratic improv comedy routine. They didn’t declare martial law on paper because that would have looked bad. Instead, they declared it in practice and gave it a haircut, a press pass, and a desk job. Most Americans never noticed. Most still don’t.

The story begins with a “banking emergency.” On March 6, 1933, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt signed Executive Order 2039, effectively closing the banks. This wasn’t a request—it was a national lockdown of the financial system.

Within days, Congress passed the Emergency Banking Relief Act, which amended the Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917 to allow the president to seize private property and control commerce even in peacetime. You read that right. The original act was intended for use against foreign enemies during wartime.

Roosevelt’s administration simply redefined the term “enemy” to include American citizens. That’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s a matter of historical record. You can read it here and here. This wasn’t martial law with tanks in the streets. It was something more insidious: the silent transfer of authority from constitutional governance to executive fiat, wrapped in the language of patriotic crisis management.

Then came House Joint Resolution 192 in June of that same year. This little piece of legal sorcery declared that debts could no longer be paid in gold. Instead, all gold was to be surrendered to the Federal Reserve, and the American public would now transact in fiat currency—Federal Reserve Notes.

In one move, Roosevelt erased the gold standard domestically, outlawed the most stable form of lawful money, and replaced it with an I.O.U. The people didn’t protest. They complied. It was all for the good of the nation, they were told. Never mind that their savings were now denominated in debt-backed paper. Never mind that the Constitution says only gold and silver shall be legal tender. Never mind that the American people’s wealth was effectively nationalized with the stroke of a pen.

By 1938, the Supreme Court put the nail in the coffin. Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins may sound like a mundane case about trains and trespass, but the decision fundamentally altered the legal landscape of America.

Prior to Erie, federal courts operated under general common law principles—those ancient foundations rooted in natural law and the rights of man.

After Erie, federal courts were now confined to statutory law. In other words, judges would interpret the rules written by bureaucrats and legislatures, not derive justice from first principles. The Constitution didn’t vanish overnight. It just became irrelevant in practice. What mattered now was what the statute said.

If Congress wrote a law giving an agency the right to inspect your property, seize your earnings, or regulate your behavior, the courts would uphold it, even if it made a mockery of the Bill of Rights.

So no, martial law was never formally declared. But we’ve been living under a continuous state of emergency ever since. Roosevelt’s national emergency was never truly repealed. Instead, it became the precedent for every president that followed.

As of this writing, there are at least 41 ongoing national emergencies in effect, some of them decades old. You can find the full list here. The 9/11 emergency is still active. The COVID emergency was extended multiple times before it was quietly phased out.

New emergencies are declared regularly over foreign sanctions, trade disruptions, and cyber threats. Each declaration unlocks a set of executive powers that bypass the normal constitutional process. Congress almost never intervenes to end them.

The public barely registers their existence. The result is a legal environment in which emergency governance is the norm, not the exception.

Why does this work? The answer lies in psychology. When people feel threatened, they surrender liberty for safety. The fight-or-flight part of the brain takes over. Critical thinking shuts down. This is not speculation. It’s basic neuroscience.

Governments have long known that fear makes citizens more compliant. Tell them the banks are collapsing, the virus is coming, the terrorists are plotting, or the climate is boiling, and they’ll accept almost anything in the name of protection.

Even the erosion of their most sacred rights. Once that pattern is set, it becomes permanent. Americans have been conditioned to believe that constitutional protections are optional—valid only when convenient and subject to immediate cancellation when the sirens start blaring.

Now let’s talk about the legal sleight of hand. Most Americans assume they live under the jurisdiction of the Constitution. But the courts increasingly operate under a hybrid system of statutory and administrative law, often enforced through what is functionally maritime law.

Don’t believe me? Take a look at the gold-fringed flag in most courtrooms. That’s not just decoration. It’s a symbol of admiralty jurisdiction, meaning you’re not in a constitutional court. You’re in a corporate tribunal. And speaking of corporations, the United States is defined in 28 U.S. Code § 3002(15)(A) as a federal corporation. You are not a sovereign individual under natural law. You are a legal entity—an asset tracked by a Social Security number and collateralized against the national debt.

From Roosevelt to Biden, every president has expanded these powers. Truman declared emergency powers during the Korean War. Reagan authorized secret continuity of government plans. Bush signed the Patriot Act. Obama embedded indefinite detention into the NDAA. Trump launched Operation Warp Speed and accelerated the surveillance state through Palantir and FISA. Biden renewed and expanded nearly every emergency he inherited. The mechanisms of control don’t change. Only the branding does.

And here we are. The Constitution is still there, printed in pocket-sized booklets and waved around at rallies. But in most courtrooms, classrooms, and government buildings, it has all the force of a museum artifact.

They didn’t suspend it. They just bypassed it. They didn’t tear it up. They just buried it under 90,000 pages of federal regulations. And when someone like you or me points this out, we’re called extremists, radicals, or conspiracy theorists. That’s fine. History is full of people who were slandered for telling the truth too early.

But the Constitution doesn’t give you rights. It recognizes the rights you already have. The paper is not the source. You are. And no act of Congress, no executive order, no foreign or domestic emergency can erase what God has written into your being. They can only convince you to forget it.

Until you remember.

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Saves the Taxpayers of Texas some money

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" HUH!

Rooting Out the Anti-Gun Rot Takes Perseverence and Grit

If anyone has any doubt how deep the rot goes in America, just take a look at the organized resistance to any move to tackle waste and fraud in the government.

Regrettably, the magnificent glow of victory has dimmed somewhat as efforts to eliminate the squandering of our nation’s resources or boot swamp creatures from government has proven almost impenetrable.

A handful of leftist legal wingnuts and the media have been able to stymie what the majority of Americans have been begging for: a government that doesn’t repeatedly disrespect our money, our values, not to mention our Constitution.

This has created a lot of frustration because the changes we were promised in November have been slower in coming than we’d like.

But there are things we must remember: the forces pushing against us are powerful, mean-spirited and boy, are they are angry. They are spitting mad that someone has dared to question anything they have done, which is why we have to be tougher, more resolute in our fight to break their grip on the country.

The grip is no more keenly felt than at the very agencies whose boot has been on the necks of lawful, responsible gun-owning Americans.

The Department of Justice – the FBI, ATF are chock-full to the gills with anti-Trump operatives who have been able to deliberately conceal all manner of sketchy activities, whether from Congress or the American people.

Imagine trying to make changes for more transparency and fiscal responsibility while surrounded by what legal scholar and author Hans Mahncke calls “a tenured army of left-wing activists, unfireable, hostile, and wholly uninterested in reform.”  Their single-minded mission is to outlast anyone who wants a shift in policy which means FBI Director Kash Patel is fighting against a machine of entrenched civil servants, many of whom are working FBI agents.

This is an incredibly tough hill to climb, but GOC is confident Kash and those he appoints will ultimately be able to kick some serious butt. The waiting, however, for the swamp creatures to be sacked (and prosecuted) is excruciating.

This is unfortunately happening at all levels of our federal government – even the National Institute of Health has faced mass walk-outs of scientists at the mere suggestion that COVID was manufactured in a lab in China.

Even well-schooled scientists will shun the science if it runs counter to their political idiosyncrasies!  GOC agrees with Mahncke when he says “The truth is that the remedies required are going to be far tougher and more radical than anything currently on the table.” 

Trump’s victory in November was – and still is – glorious.  But we’ve said it before and we will say it again: it can also send the wrong message that it’s time to sit back and relax.

THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO RELAX.  When your enemy is on his heels, this is the exact time to move forward with resolve, which is why GOC will keep hammering away that there are battles to be fought every day of the week.  We want to celebrate every win out there, but we must keep pushing ahead with the momentum that took us over the line in November.  In some ways, the battles are even greater – the anger, deceit and ugliness with which the Left has come at us has been stunning.  The media has given them a powerful boost and it’s unfortunate that so many folks have drunk the fake Koolaid news – and in such mass quantities.

Some have said this is a unique time to be politically alive and that the FAFO ethos is upon us. There’s no FA in the Gun Owners community – but we sure want the anti-gun Left to FO.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

NY Congressman Reveals Anti-Gun Bias in Propaganda Letter to Constituent by Dan Wos

Second Circuits Review of Cases Challenging New York’s Concealed Carry Improvement Act iStock-1421061908

When it comes to unconstitutional gun legislation, it is crucial to hold our representatives accountable. It’s even more important to call them out when they attempt to circumvent the Constitution with politically biased propaganda.

With the recent push for H.R. 38 (Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act), gun owners across America have been demanding that their elected officials support the bill.

Democrat representative Paul D. Tonko from the 20th district in New York State not only made it clear he will not be supporting H.R. 38, but his response letter was extremely revealing. Radical leftists like Tonko seem to have no idea what the Constitution represents and what the 2nd Amendment actually means. Upon instructing Tonko to support H.R. 38, he responded in the following way.

Tonko started his anti-gun lecture with, “As you well know, in recent years, our nation has witnessed an unprecedented spate of gun related acts of violence.” The reason this sentence is so damaging to our State of New York and the Country in general is that Democrat representatives seem to be either blind to, or purposefully ignorant of, the real causes of violence. Blaming the gun and ignoring human behavior has always been a Democrat strategy, and using the word “unprecedented” is out of place and used purely for effect in this case.

Next, Tonko would use an emotional ploy in his letter. In the following sentence, Tonko said, “These horrific events, shocked and saddened the nation,” when referring to violence. I am sure he is aware that this type of emotional fear-inducing rhetoric works with liberal voters, but in this case, Tonko seems to be trying this strategy on conservatives, who know better.

In typical left-wing fashion, Tonko used the old faithful, “we cannot afford to do nothing.” The ignorance of this comment is especially aggravating because radical Democrats like Tonko are referring to more gun regulations when they say things like this. Unfortunately, their focus is never on the criminal and what causes them to act violently, but rather always on more gun regulations as the solution to human violence. It has become ingrained in the anti-gun mindset that “doing something” always means more gun regulations.

Tonko went on to say, “H.R. 38 would allow individuals with concealed carry permits in any state to carry a concealed weapon in any other state. The bill would also allow qualified individuals to carry concealed firearms in school zones and on federal public lands.”

When I first read this, I thought to myself, “Yes, that’s exactly the way it should be.” But of course, Tonko has a different perspective. Tonko followed up his statement with, “this legislation would effectively negate any commonsense safeguards States wanted to put in place to protect their citizens.” In other words, they want more control and always leave room for restrictions.

Of course, being a true radical anti-gunner, Tonko threw in the statement “commonsense,” implying that anyone who supports H.R. 38 has no common sense.

It’s frustrating to watch politicians drunk on the anti-gun Kool-Aid support this type of legislation because we know that over 95% of mass killings occur in gun free zones, exactly what Tonko is promoting here.

How many children must die before politicians like Paul Tonko stop supporting deadly gun free school zones? Ever since Joe Biden introduced the 1990 Gun Free School Zones Act, the killing of innocent children and teachers has increased because defensive gun use has been essentially eliminated, giving all the leverage to the bad guys. Is Tonko perpetuating the killing of innocent children in support of his Democrat party’s failed policies? It appears that way.

In what appeared to be an attempt at patronizing those in support of H.R. 38, (because of course an electable politician must appear to be for all the people they represent) Tonko acknowledged the fact that “families have the right to protect themselves and sportsmen have the right to own guns for hunting and target shooting purposes.” The problem with this belief is that it completely negates the actual purpose of the 2nd Amendment in favor of activities that Democrats believe they can regulate. It appears that Paul Tonko believes the 2nd Amendment was written for the purpose of people protecting themselves and hunting. Does he not understand the reason our Founders wrote the 2nd Amendment?

In typical anti-gun form, Tonko followed up his arrogant statement with, “However, we must also be sure to keep illegal guns out of the hands of those who intend to do harm to others.”

This seemed like a typical left-wing talking point for a couple of reasons. First, anti-gunners like Tonko can never support a pro-gun policy without having a counteracting qualifier. This is the typical, “I support the second amendment, but….” strategy. By saying they support a Constitutional right while simultaneously offering up a law that violates that very right, left-wingers reveal themselves. The truth is, they do not support the Constitution, but they need you to think they do. Their arrogance always causes them to insert some sort of qualifier when being forced to declare their support for the 2nd Amendment. They must look good in the eyes of their voters.

Tonko also said he “swore to uphold the Constitution,” while following it up with, “it is also my duty to promote the interests of public safety and common sense.” in other words, like most radical left-wing politicians, they will swear on the Bible to get into office and then violate the Constitutional rights of the very people they represent.

Paul, you’re so-called “duty to promote the interests of public safety and common sense” does not give you authority to violate the rights of American citizens in the process. Your job is to uphold the Constitution.

In closing, Paul Tonko couldn’t resist making another final comment about passing “commonsense legislation,” which frankly is getting tired and overused by the gun-grabbers. They use it to serve their own righteousness and recruit those who are afraid of looking “senseless.”

Although Paul Tonko claims that he remains “open and committed to the best ideas out there,” I doubt he will entertain the pro-gun position. If Paul truly wants to understand the risks gun restrictions present to the safety of New Yorkers, I am here to discuss the “best ideas out there” with him.

If you want to experience the most shameful, Constitution-violating human beings on the planet, come to New York. You may get the pleasure of meeting Paul D. Tonko.

About Dan Wos, Author – Good Gun Bad Guy

Dan Wos is available for Press Commentary. For more information, contact PR HERE

Dan Wos is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment advocate, Host of The Loaded Mic and Author of the “GOOD GUN BAD GUY” book series. He speaks at events, is a contributing writer for many publications, and can be found on radio stations across the country. Dan has been a guest on Newsmax, the Sean Hannity Show, Real America’s Voice, and several others. Speaking on behalf of gun-rights, Dan exposes the strategies of the anti-gun crowd and explains their mission to disarm law-abiding American gun-owners.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Why the Supreme Court Fight Over Nationwide Injunctions Matters for Gun Owners by Ammoland Editors & Staff

Opinion
H/T Mark Smith, Four Boxes Diner YouTube channel.

 

If you’re someone who values the Second Amendment, you should be paying close attention to a Supreme Court case that—on the surface—has nothing to do with guns. But dig deeper, and you’ll see why the fight over nationwide injunctions is a backdoor battle that could seriously affect our right to keep and bear arms.

Here’s the quick breakdown—and why this case might change the legal battlefield for good.

What’s This Case Really About?

The Supreme Court just heard arguments in a case tied to the birthright citizenship loophole, allowing the theft of our national heritage. But that’s not the headline for us.

What really matters here is a challenge to nationwide or universal injunctions—court orders from one judge that stop the government from enforcing a law everywhere in America, even for people who aren’t part of the lawsuit.

In recent years, anti-gun, anti-Trump, anti-liberty districts—think places like California, New York, and D.C.—have used this tactic to block federal policies they don’t like. These aren’t class actions with real representation of the whole country.

They’re legal grenades tossed by activist judges to freeze Trump-era and pro-2A policies coast-to-coast.

Why Should Gun Owners Even Care?

Let’s say the ATF tries to enforce some insane new regulation—like calling semi-auto rifles “machine guns” again. Normally, you’d expect gun rights groups to fight that in court, win, and have the rule stopped for their members.

But in the current system, one anti-gun judge can issue a nationwide ban that stops your rights even if you weren’t part of the case.

Even worse? These emergency rulings are flooding the Supreme Court’s docket, forcing them to deal with messy, rushed legal chaos instead of working through proper cases with clear facts and full records.

But What If They Try to Ban Guns Nationwide?

Justice Sotomayor actually floated this fear: “What if a new president tries to confiscate all guns? Wouldn’t we need a nationwide injunction to stop him?”

Sounds dramatic—but it’s a distraction.

As Mark Smith from the Four Boxes Diner explains, the proper way to stop unconstitutional executive actions is through the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). That’s how groups like the Second Amendment Foundation, GOA, and FPC have crushed illegal ATF rules before.

Using vacatur—a legal term that cancels a regulation—a judge can shut down an overreaching gun ban without needing to apply that ruling to every citizen instantly. Gun owners and pro-2A groups would still win in court, just through the proper legal channels.

So What’s the Problem With Nationwide Injunctions?

Here’s the real issue:

  • They give one judge the power to affect everyone’s rights.
  • They bypass the hard work of building real class-action lawsuits.
  • They let left-wing groups “forum shop” for friendly judges in places like San Francisco or D.C.
  • They weaponize the courts against lawful executive action and constitutional gun policy.

That’s not the rule of law. That’s rule by activist decree.

What Happens Next?

Most observers think the Supreme Court is going to shut this scheme down—likely in a 7–2 decision. That would mean:

  • No more coast-to-coast bans from one rogue judge.
  • More power to local and state-level legal battles.
  • A cleaner path for gun rights groups to strategically fight anti-gun laws—without getting bogged down in politically driven injunctions. This may seem like a courtroom technicality, but don’t be fooled—it’s a power struggle over how federal laws are challenged and who gets to speak for America.

Gun owners have always played by the rules—filing smart lawsuits, sticking to the Constitution, and winning fair and square. These universal injunctions? They’re shortcuts for people who lose in the court of public opinion and try to win in backroom courtrooms.

It’s time to put an end to that game.

Stay informed. Stay armed—with knowledge and your rights. —A proud member of the well-informed, liberty-loving 2A generation

Note: If you want more in-depth legal analysis, check out Mark Smith’s full breakdown on the Four Boxes Diner YouTube channel.

Handcuffs

Arresting a Judge? About Time Or a Mistake by the FED ~ VIDEO

Without notice, this judge was stopped on a public street, handcuffed behind her back — a technique reserved for the most dangerous individuals — and within minutes, the FBI Director himself had posted still photos of this event on X…

AmmoLand Shooting Sports News
 98Comments