











The Winchester 1300 Defender has an old-world charm to it. It’s something we don’t see much these days, but it shouldn’t be a surprise coming from the Winchester Repeating Arms company. The classic American gun maker might still exist in name, but its glory days seem long gone. Winchester has two distinctive generations. We have its era as the lever gun company and its second era as the shotgun company.
Winchester produced the first successful pump action shotgun and continued to perfect the design along with the Model 12 and later the Model 1200, but finally concluding their reign with the Winchester Model 1300 shotgun. Although the 1300 is the accumulation of several small changes to the Winchester 1200 and not necessarily a distinctly different gun.
The 1200 and 1300 series were designed to compete with the Remington 870s and Model 500s of the world. They required less skilled labor and craftsmanship than the Model 12 and were easier to mass produce. At the same time, these guns are a step above the Remingtons and Mossbergs of the world. They were quite successful and came in a number of different configurations, including the aptly named model.
Winchester built the Model 1300 to be a general-purpose shotgun. They produced models focused on hunting deer and birds, turkey models, slug guns, and the Defender model we are discussing today. Winchester picked a great name for a defensive shotgun. The Defender was built for tactical use, mainly aimed at police, military, and home defense markets.

The Defender sports a standard 18.5-inch barrel and a magazine tube that extends the entire length of the barrel. This allows you to hold seven rounds in the magazine tube. For tactical use, shorter is better, and so is more ammunition. A simple bead sight tops the barrel, and we get the furniture you expect from a tactical shotgun developed in 1964. Meaning no black plastic. It’s pure wood and arguably looks fantastic.

Other than that, it’s not much different from other Winchester 1300s. It lacks the fancy texturing of the Deer Slug models and is not optics-ready. The gun is plain, but shotguns can be quite plain and remain effective. If you want to replace the stock and pump with polymer goodness, that’s possible, but the wood has too much charm to get rid of it.
Pump action shotguns haven’t changed much since the 1960s and 70s. That’s where the dominant designs still come from, and the Winchester 1300 still keeps up with guns like the Mossberg 500 and Remington 870 series. We get a simple cross-bolt safety that’s in front of the trigger and a rather small pump release behind the trigger.

The pump is a little dinky and surprisingly small for a tactical shotgun. It’s a corncob design that is quite small. It’s still easy to grab and use, but compared to most guns, it’s rather small. Heck, even compared to other models of the Winchester 1300. My Winchester Deer Slug gun’s pump is quite a bit larger than the Defender’s model.
The stock has that 14-inch length of pull that we are used to with these old guns. It’s fairly long for modern shooters. A big, thick recoil pad might help soften things. The Defender models lack any fancy checkering around the grips, and it’s just a straight wood stock.
You won’t be impressed by the gun’s ergonomics if you’ve ever handled nearly any other pump shotgun. The Winchester 1300 doesn’t stand out in any way. The ergonomics aren’t excellent, but they are functional and useable.

One stand out is how easily everything glides and pops into place. The action is slick and smooth. Thumbing rounds into the tubular magazine is very smooth, and the shell elevator moves out of the way with very little effort. Winchester certainly built these guns well and didn’t skimp on their quality control.
The Defender seems pretty standard compared to most other pump-action shotguns. Where it does stand out is the use of a rotating bolt. Shotgunners will know that the Benelli SuperNova and Nova utilize a rotating bolt, but Winchester did it first. The rotating bolt does two things for us. First, it exerts rotation force on the shell along with rearward force, which could help with a hull that might otherwise get stuck.

The second benefit is the speed pump design. After you fire the gun, the pump wants to automatically unlock and even slightly pushes the pump and action rearward oh so slightly. This, combined with the slick pump action, makes this a blazingly fast pump action gun. You can rock and roll with this gun a good bit faster than others. Against the clock, it might only be fractions of the second, but those fractions can matter. It’s fun to see just how fast you can run the gun’s seven rounds.

The textured pump provides enough texture to run the pump quickly. It is small, but the texture allows you to grip it tightly and surely. You can run the action and control the gun. I would like a bigger pump with some more material on the rear to make it less of a reach, but it’s workable. The biggest challenge comes from the long length of pull, which makes it tough to square up behind the gun.
Recoil from a 12 gauge pump gun doesn’t change much. You can get a hefty dose of it if you aren’t using the right recoil mitigation techniques. My chosen technique is to push the pump forward while pulling rearward with the stock. This creates tension, which stabilizes the gun and helps defeat recoil.
The Defender’s front grip provides enough texture for an easy push forward. The rear pistol grip has enough of a hook to pull it nicely into your shoulder. With these techniques in place, I kept the gun from getting too far ahead of me. I had enough control the recoil pad didn’t matter much.

The bead isn’t big, and it’s welded directly to the barrel. Even so, there isn’t a noticeable issue with the point of impact and the point of aim. It hits a little high with slugs, but this is a buckshot gun. With buckshot, it’s dead on and hits where you’re aiming. Heck, even the trigger is surprisingly nice.
As you’d expect, the Winchester 1300 is as reliable as it gets. A pump action shotgun design from a legendary American company better be functional and reliable. The 1300 eats up whatever you put through it. High brass, low brass, whatever, as long as it’s standard length.
The Winchester Defender series is long gone these days, but not forgotten. They are still common enough to pop up on the used market, and if you can get one for a good price, they are a worthwhile investment. I imagine in the next few years, they’ll start to climb in price, so if you want one, this might be the time to act. They are solid shotguns that still keep up with the current crop of modern pump shotguns.
I’ve been paying close attention to the war in Israel and Gaza; watching a lot of footage. Came across some video of Palestinians — probably late teens/early 20s — throwing stones at vehicles in a chaotic protest on a road. This was, I believe, on Saturday, and it wasn’t clear to me whether the footage was real time or from recent protests.
Suddenly, one of the most active stone-throwers pulled up his right leg, his face knotted in a grimace of pain, and he began to hop away on his good leg. His comrades abandoned their pile of rocks and helped him down an incline and out of the frame.
I knew immediately what had happened: The stone-thrower had taken a .22lr round to the ankle or shin.
“Medics in the Gaza Strip have reported treating an influx of protesters who appear to have been deliberately targeted in the ankle by Israeli forces in recent unrest at the volatile boundary of the blockaded Palestinian enclave. At least one person has been killed and dozens more wounded since demonstrations by groups of young men, some of them throwing stones and molotov cocktails, began in mid-September.”
The Guardian being The Guardian, this was presented as a new cruelty inflicted by the Occupation on oppressed Palestinians.
Human rights groups say that such targeting procedures are unlawful as they allow the use of potentially lethal force with no immediate threat to soldiers’ lives.
They did get one paragraph of “balance” into the piece:
In a statement, the IDF said: “Over the past few weeks, the Hamas terror organisation has organised violent riots along the border fence, for purposes of harming Israeli security forces … It should be noted that the IDF resorts to live fire only after exhausting all available options, and only as necessary to handle imminent threat.”
For years, the IDF has been deploying integrally suppressed .22 caliber Ruger 10/22 carbines, originally as a “less lethal” option for riot control. They are also used as a “hush puppy” to take out dogs and lights in raid operations. Because Israel actually adheres to rules of engagement and laws of combat, the Israeli Judge Advocate General tested the effect of fire from the .22lr and reclassified it as a lethal weapon, which restricts its use.
But clearly, it was in the field in the weeks preceding the explosion of violence in Hamas’ Operation Al Aqsa Flood.
The use of a .22 in a sniper role at limited range, especially in urban environments makes a lot of sense. It’s comparatively quiet even unsuppressed, making it difficult for an enemy to determine where fire is coming from. Suppressed, it’s pretty close to silent; only the sonic crack of the bullet is heard. If your target is higher than the ankles, a .22 can be plenty lethal. Ask any emergency room doc.
Chechens deployed .22 snipers against Russian troops in urban combat in the 1990s, using makeshift suppressors made from plastic bottles — a technique depicted in the movie Shooter, based off of Stephen Hunter’s classic thriller Point of Impact. They were taking head shots.
The Russians took heed, and developed a purpose-built .22 sniper rifle, the Kalashnikov SV99:
The .22 LR SV-99 sniper rifle was developed as a precision small-caliber weapon for special forces snipers to silently engage enemy personnel and other targets at ranges up to 100 meters, as well as for training purposes.
For their part, the IDF now has an updated and upgraded Ruger to work with (seen in the top photo):
Countless threads on gun forums have flogged the topic to death and beyond, but it bears keeping in mind that the .22 is more than just a plinker.

California is always at the forefront of the national conversation on gun control, and Governor Gavin Newsom is a prominent figure in pushing for strict regulations. California’s plasticized Governor signed Assembly Bill 28 which directly assaults law-abiding American citizens’ by adding a state tax to firearm or ammunition purchases.
The federal government already imposes a 10-12% tax on all firearm purchases. But the new California law is the first time where a state will impose another tax on any person who wants to purchase a firearm or ammunition.
The relevant part of the law does the following things:

The term “sin tax” is typically used to discourage certain behaviors or activities that are deemed socially undesirable, such as smoking or excessive alcohol consumption. However, it’s important to recognize that owning a firearm is a constitutional right protected by the Second Amendment.
Check out KSG Armory’s affordable holsters.
Applying a sin tax to firearms implies that gun ownership is inherently sinful or undesirable, which undermines the principles of our nation. It is a disservice to the millions of law-abiding citizens who exercise their right to bear arms responsibly and for legitimate reasons such as self-defense, hunting, and sport shooting.
Newsom’s proposed gun tax unfairly targets law-abiding citizens. By imposing additional financial burdens on those who seek to exercise their Second Amendment rights, this policy creates an unnecessary obstacle for individuals who follow the law.
Criminals steal the vast majority of guns they use in crimes. This “sin tax” does not affect these criminals, only law-abiding citizens.
Furthermore, a tax like this disproportionately impacts lower-income individuals who struggle to afford the additional costs associated with gun ownership. This regressive approach contradicts the goal of ensuring equal access to self-defense for all citizens, regardless of their economic status.
Thanks to the Craiyon website for generating this image of California’s destructive leader, Governor Newsom.
Advocates of the gun tax argue that it will generate revenue to fund programs aimed at reducing gun violence. While this may sound appealing in theory, it’s important to scrutinize the effectiveness of such a claim.
I recently wrote on how gun control advocates use the term “gun violence” deceptively to disarm law-abiding citizens.
Understanding Gun Violence: Numbers, Context, and Solutions
Anyone who thinks “government programs” to study or reduce gun violence is sadly nieve. No matter how much money they throw at the problem of violence, it will fail because the progressive leaders in California don’t want to address violence. They just want to disarm their constituents. In this respect, they have been effective.
I am convinced that these programs will funnel a lot of money to bogus organizations run by friends and associates of California lawmakers, and do nothing to focus any real help to fix mental health, or address the lawlessness and broken California criminal justice system that encourages crime.
If you want to read the entire bill, you can do so here.
While the goal of reducing gun violence is undoubtedly a noble one, Governor Gavin Newsom’s proposed gun tax is evil, misguided and counterproductive approach. For a leader to purposefully make the people they govern more vulnerable to criminals, while encouraging those criminals, is not just wrong, but it is evil.
I moved out of California in 2014, and I am so glad I did. I wonder how much longer will Californian’s put up with this type of garbage.
California Assembly Bill 28 unfairly targets law-abiding citizens, places an undue financial burden on those with limited means, and ultimately does nothing root causes of gun violence.