Categories
All About Guns

A Closer Look at the 2025 NRA Officers Election By John Petrolino

AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File

The 2025 National Rifle Association Annual Meeting was a big one for the organization. After the membership meeting wrapped up–with a number of noteworthy happenings occurring there–the newly installed board met on Monday April 28. The election of officers did not go lock-step with what the nominating committee wished, and the so-called “reformers” managed to sweep the slate, taking control of most of the organization.

Over the last two years, the NRA Board of Directors has cleaved off into essentially two parties, with a few directors remaining unaffiliated. Previously reported, the 2025 election of board members overwhelmingly favored one party over the other.

One group self-identifies as “Strong NRA,” and is made up of what’s colloquially called the “old guard.” The other group labels themselves “NRA 2.0,” and they’re referred to as “reformers.” NRA 2.0 has alleged that the Strong NRA is made up of a Cabal of loyalists of former NRA CEO and Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre.

NRA 2.0 took 66% of the available seats in the recent board election, a near supermajority of the spots. Strong NRA took the remaining 34%.

There were no incumbent directors or nominated candidates elected or reelected who were unaffiliated.

The Nominating Committee made the recommendation that Bob Barr continue to serve as president and have First Vice President Bachenberg replaced by Second Vice President Mark Vaughan, with Eb Wilkinson to take the second vice president spot.

The committee recommended keeping incumbents Executive Vice President Doug Hamlin, Secretary John Frazer, Treasurer Sonya Rowling, and Chief Compliance Officer Mensinger.

It was recently reported by Cam Edwards that the NRA 2.0 party took control at Monday’s board meeting, with them securing top leadership positions. Incumbent Strong NRA President Bob Barr was challenged by NRA First Vice President Bill Bachenberg–a proponent of reform.

As discussed in an interview with Edwards prior to the officers election, Bachenberg stated his intention to challenge Barr. Traditionally–on a handshake–officers would normally serve two years in a given position and then bump up the line. It can be speculated that Bachenberg’s challenge to Barr is what resulted in the Nominating Committee’s suggestion to remove him from the line.

Ultimately, Bachenberg secured a win over Barr, with the top three officer positions being secured by reform-minded directors. These results were reported officially by the NRA.

“I am deeply honored to be entrusted by my colleagues on the Board to serve as President of the NRA,” NRA President Bill Bachenberg said in a statement. “We are at a pivotal point in our Association’s history as we work to reach out to new members, build upon the trust of existing members, and provide the gold-standard programs that American gun owners expect. As the Nation’s oldest civil rights organization, the NRA plays a critical role in protecting and advancing freedom in America.”

The final numbers are in. A request was made to board Secretary John Frazer to return the official tally, as well as the results of the committee appointments/elections. NRA spokesperson Nick Perrine delivered the election results to Bearing Arms in fulfillment of that request.

The report noted that Bill Bachenberg secured the president’s seat. The vote tally was 38 for Bachenberg and 34 for Barr, for a total of 72 votes. Bachenberg’s win comes where a 4.2% swing could have resulted in a loss. He took 53% of the votes, enough to secure more than a simple majority.

Three votes could have changed this election.

The following officers–including the executive vice president–were elected “by acclamation”: First Vice President Mark Vaughan, Second Vice President Rocky Marshall, Executive Vice President Doug Hamlin, Treasurer Sonya Rowling, and Chief Compliance Officer Robert Mensinger.

Incumbent Secretary John Frazer won with 38 votes, over Bryant Lewis who took 32 votes.

The following committees were also formalized and or had members added to them:

Executive Committee: Thomas Arvas, Bob Barr, Charles Beers III, Anthony Colandro, Todd Ellis, Al Hammond, Craig Haggard, Maria Heil, Charles Hiltunen, Robert Mansell, Buz Mills, Janet Nyce, James Porter II, David Raney, Barbara Rumpel, Amanda Suffecool, Craig Swartz, Linda Walker, Bruce Widener, and Robert Wos.

**Note: The President, First Vice President, and Second Vice President also serve on the Executive Committee.

Nominating Committee: Cam Edwards, Al Hammond, Maria Heil, Robben Love, Mitzy McCorvey, Buz Mills, Janet Nyce, Susan Springhorn, and Robert Wos.

Audit Committee: Charles Beers III, Jonathan Goldstein, Theresa Inacker, Rocky Marshall, and John Richardson

Special Contribution Fund (Whittington Center) (terms ending in 2028): Al Hammond, Robert Mansell, Barbara Rumpel, and Craig Swartz.

The 2025 NRAAM is now in the rearview. NRA Executive Vice President and CEO Doug Hamlin celebrated the conclusion of what he said was a “very successful” meeting.

“I know one thing for sure: NRA’s best days are ahead of us,” said Hamlin. “This Association is moving forward, full speed ahead, to support the shooting sports, train new gun owners, and defend the sacred right to self-defense. I thank the dedicated staff of the NRA who work day and night on behalf of NRA’s millions of members and America’s more than 100 million firearms owners.”

The decisive win that NRA 2.0 saw in the board election prior to the NRAAM seems to have paid off for the reform candidates, gaining them more ground within the Association. While the members spoke loudly and clearly in who they wanted to take a director’s chair, how big is their hold now within the ranks?

With a new makeup of directors, a shakeup within the officers’ line, and the formulation of reform-minded committees, it’s time for the BOD to get to work. The majority of the Association’s legal problems are behind them–with some exceptions. The voices of the members have been communicated to the board, and everyone will have to see who listens and who does not.

According to the NRA, the 2026 NRA Annual Meetings & Exhibits will take place in Houston, Texas, from April 17-19, 2026.

The complete list of election results as sent by Spokesperson Perrine is below:

President
Bill Bachenberg – 38
Bob Barr – 34

First Vice President
Mark Vaughan (by acclamation)

Second Vice President
Rocky Marshall (by acclamation)

Executive Vice President
Doug Hamlin (by acclamation)

Secretary
John Frazer – 38
Bryant Lewis- 32

Treasurer
Sonya Rowling (by acclamation)

Chief Compliance Officer
Robert Mensinger (by acclamation)

Executive Committee
Thomas Arvas
Bob Barr
Charles Beers III
Anthony Colandro
Todd Ellis
Al Hammond
Craig Haggard
Maria Heil
Charles Hiltunen
Robert Mansell
Buz Mills
Janet Nyce
James Porter II
David Raney
Barbara Rumpel
Amanda Suffecool
Craig Swartz
Linda Walker
Bruce Widener
Robert Wos
**Note: The President, First Vice President, and Second Vice President also serve on the Executive Committee.

Nominating Committee
Cam Edwards
Al Hammond
Maria Heil
Robben Love
Mitzy McCorvey
Buz Mills
Janet Nyce
Susan Springhorn
Robert Wos

Audit Committee
Charles Beers III
Jonathan Goldstein
Theresa Inacker
Rocky Marshall
John Richardson

Special Contribution Fund (Whittington Center) (terms ending in 2028)
Al Hammond
Robert Mansell
Barbara Rumpel
Craig Swartz

Categories
All About Guns

Snub Nose Colt SAA

Categories
All About Guns Allies Soldiering

Sir Evelyn Wood – Victoria Cross Recipient Trampled By A Giraffe

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

Air Force Flinches on Arming Recruits with Working Guns …Again by Tred Law

Opinion

U.S. Air Force Basic Military Training trainees carry weapons at Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland on August 2, 2024. (U.S. Air Force photo by Ava Leone)

Well, here we go again. The United States Air Force had a brief moment of clarity—just a moment—when it looked like they might start treating their own recruits like real warfighters by letting them carry actual M4 rifles during basic training.

But predictably, that moment passed faster than a Beltway politician dodging accountability.

According to the Air Force’s top brass, arming trainees with real, live-fire-capable rifles throughout boot camp is just too hard. Too many “logistical challenges,” they say. Too much responsibility. Heaven forbid young Americans who sign up to wear the uniform actually handle the tools of war early on—tools they’ll be expected to be intimately familiar with when the real fight starts.

Instead, they’re sticking with glorified toys: inert M4s that look real, feel real, but don’t go bang. Maj. Gen. Wolfe Davidson, who oversees the whole training pipeline, confirmed they’re not moving forward with real rifles “in the near term.” You know what that means—it’s code for never, unless they get forced into it by reality.

Let’s be clear: The Marines do it. The Army does it. Hell, even most ROTC programs give their kids more trigger time. But the Air Force? Nope. They’re convinced a red-plastic-tipped dummy gun is enough to create a “warfighter mindset.”

And that’s the problem.

We’ve got high-ranking Air Force officials saying we’re on the brink of a near-peer war with China or Russia.

We’ve got high-ranking Air Force officials saying we’re on the brink of a near-peer war with China or Russia. They’re right. The next war won’t be fought from cushy air-conditioned offices—it’ll be brutal, ugly, and real. But if you believe that, and you still won’t arm the next generation of Airmen with anything more than a cosplay rifle, you’re not preparing for war. You’re playing pretend.

Security concerns? Too many weapons to store? Not enough instructors? Guess what—none of that stopped our grandfathers from winning WWII. They figured it out with clipboards, paper maps, and grit. But now, in the era of biometric locks and digital armories, the world’s most advanced Air Force can’t figure out how to responsibly issue a basic firearm to a grown adult?

Meanwhile, here’s what Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth had to say just three months ago in his Message to the Force:

“We will remain the strongest and most lethal force in the world… All of this will be done with a focus on lethality, meritocracy, accountability, standards, and readiness.”

So let’s ask the obvious: how exactly does marching around with a red-tipped plastic toy gun meet the Secretary’s call for lethality? How does locking a non-functioning rifle in a dorm room locker restore the warrior ethos?

It doesn’t.

This is what happens when political correctness meets the profession of arms. Instead of sharpening the spear, the Air Force dulled it—again.

Sure, they still make the recruits look like they’re carrying rifles. They march them around with fake M4s, let them break them down—oh wait, you can’t—and then practice holding them. It’s like handing someone a rubber knife and calling them a chef.

You can’t fake warfighting. And you sure as hell can’t fake the Second Amendment. That right—the one to keep and bear arms—isn’t just a civilian right. It’s a warrior’s foundation. If the Air Force can’t trust its own people with real rifles in basic training, maybe it shouldn’t be trusted to send them into combat either.

We’re raising a generation of soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines to fight enemies who are armed to the teeth and trained from childhood. And instead of meeting that threat with strength, we’re stuffing red and blue plastic into warrior’s M4 barrels and calling it a day.

Lock and load, America. Because the people in charge of defending this country still think the scariest thing in a barracks is a loaded rifle.


About Tred Law

Tred Law is your everyday patriot with a deep love for this country and a no-compromise approach to the Second Amendment. He does not write articles for Ammoland every week, but when he does write, it is usually about liberals Fing with his right to keep and bear arms.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Gun Fearing Wussies

FPC Trashes DOJ’s “Horrifically Flawed” Brief In Machine Gun Ban Appeal by Mark Chesnut

A brief filed by the federal government in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in a case involving the constitutionality of banning machine guns has one pro-gun rights group seeing red.

The case United States v. Justin Bryce Brown revolves around the federal government charging Justice Bryce Brown with knowingly possessing a machine gun in violation of federal law. Brown’s attorney argued that under the landmark 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, the statute was unconstitutional as applied to him.

A district court dismissed the charge against Brown in January, holding that the ban violated the Second Amendment as it applied to him. The government then appealed to the Fifth Circuit.

A brief filed April 24 by Patrick Lemon, acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Mississippi, argued that “machine guns are not the kind of arms protected by the Second Amendment,” and that America’s “history of regulating dangerous and unusual weapons confirms [the federal machine gun ban’s] constitutionality.” The brief drew quick condemnation from the Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC), which called the brief both “horribly flawed” and “insanely offensive.”

One portion of the brief that really set the gun-rights group off was when Lemon cited The Trace, a rabidly anti-gun instrument of Michael Bloomberg’s so-called Everytown for Gun Safety, as his source of information.

“Acting U.S. Attorney Lemon’s horrifically flawed brief is unprincipled and an incredible affront to the People and our constitutionally protected rights,”  Brandon Combs, FPC president, said in a press release about the brief. “Not only does this lemon of a brief expressly advance anti-liberty arguments, it went so far as to cite the radically anti-Second Amendment Everytown propaganda publication, The Trace, in support of its position. This brief could not be less consistent with President Trump’s ‘Protecting Second Amendment Rights’ executive order.”

Since President Trump’s executive order on protecting the Second Amendment does matter—or at least it should to Lemon—Combs said the brief should prompt the president and Attorney General Pam Bondi to look into Lemon’s ability to respect the executive order. After all, the U.S. Attorney filed the poorly thought-out brief on behalf of the federal government, which Trump heads.

“This insanely offensive brief should never have been filed in any court, let alone at the Fifth Circuit,” Combs continued. “It should be immediately withdrawn and thrown into the trash, along with Mr. Lemon’s ability to make these filings in the future.”

Combs added that the Lemon filing is a prime example of why the organization has been asking President Trump to appoint a competent Second Amendment czar to coordinate the administration’s agenda across the government and with stakeholders in Second Amendment litigation.

“Our rights must be protected at all costs and the American people are counting on President Trump and Attorney General Bondi to fulfill their promise to do just that,” he concluded.

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Big Horn Armory .500 S&W Magnum

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Marlin Model 95 Dark Series .45-70

Categories
All About Guns Allies

Unique British Crankfire .58 Morse Manual Machine Gun

Categories
All About Guns

That is why the Marine Corps M27 has replaced the M249 SAW.

Categories
All About Guns

Kelsey’s Rifle by Edmund Lewis

John Kelsey, the stage driver, was prevailed upon to accept the desperado as a fare and he wasn’t exactly happy about it. His injured leg was still bothering him and he hadn’t slept well. The rough-and-tumble Montanan didn’t much like having to tote Bill’s sorry ass to Virginia City but he needed the money, needed Bill’s fare.

It was cold that morning in Montana. Small, hard snowflakes were blowing, portending the storm to come. Things went reasonably well on the road, though the ruts were slick with early morning ice and the stage was bouncing and skidding along, but Kelsey had a strong team and was making good time. They would be in Virginia City in a few hours. 

Bad Bill was riding with a salesman and two other passengers, one a lady. Bill was swigging from the bottle of rotgut he’d stuck in his pocket to ward off the cold of that winter morning. By the time the coach had reached Brown’s Bridge station on the Big Hole River, Bad Bill was drunk and bullying the other passengers. 

In the melee that ensued, Kelsey took on Bill and threw him into the stage yard. Bill responded by pulling his Colt and taking a shot at him. Bad move – and Bill’s last. Kelsey reached up and pulled his rifle from the stage’s boot and shot him dead with the big .45-75 Winchester.

These events, as reported in the Virginia City newspaper the next day, add to the rich history of John Kelsey’s 1 of 100 Model ’76 Winchester. He had been given the rifle by Sam Benham, a Butte mining official, when the two were hunting for winter meat. Kelsey shot an elk with his single-shot Sharps, while Benham, who had an untimely attack of buck fever, stood idly by. Kelsey grabbed Benham’s Winchester and in short order dropped three more elk with the repeater.

“Hell,” cried Benham, “a man that shoots like that needs a better gun. Take it . . . it’s yours!”

Suddenly John Kelsey became the second owner of this historic Winchester rifle.

The rifle, serial number 713, is by far the most well-known Model 1876 1 of 100. On November 15, 1877 it was shipped by Winchester to the Butte Rifle Club in the company of several other 1 of 100s and 1 of 1000s. Sam Benham, along with William A. Clark, one of the Montana Copper Kings, used the rifles in shooting matches at the club.

Kelsey’s rifle is an early First Model 1876, a so-called “Open Top” because of the lack of a dust cover. It has a set trigger and came with sling swivels from the factory. The rifle is in surprisingly good condition for having been carried in the boot of Kelsey’s stage for many years.

The early Model 1876 guns were .45-75 W.C.F. caliber and later guns were chambered in the then more popular .45-60 W.C.F. The earliest Model 1873 premium rifles were simply engraved 1 of 1000 in Arabic. Later rifles had “One of One Thousand” or “One of One Hundred” engraved with an arabesque and foliate border in a panel on the top flat of the octagon barrel, just forward of the receiver. 

The rifles were stocked in premium, highly figured and finished walnut. The 1 of 1000 rifles had platinum barrel bands inlaid at the breech and muzzle end. The receivers of most of these rifles were colorfully case hardened, and the blued barrels and magazines received extra finish. Set triggers were often installed, and special engraving or gold plating could be ordered on request. Winchester had a policy of providing whatever the customer desired and would pay for.

To this day Kelsey’s rifle is still accurate, and the author has shot two-inch groups with handloads at 100 yards.                                   

The history of John Kelsey was related by his grandson, John Ballard, in March 1942 in The Montana News Association and was repeated by James E. Serven in an article in the American Rifleman in September of 1957: 

“ . . . his early years were spent in the mountains, before the arrival of the railroads in that region. His father, Eli Kelsey, became the historian of the Mormon Church after his arrival in Utah in 1848.

Shortly thereafter, Brigham Young ordered a group of young men to leave everything and to ‘go on a mission, without script or purse’ to preach the Mormon gospel. A number of men, including Eli, refused, fearing they would lose all their worldly goods to someone else while in the field.

“Along with the others, Eli was cut off from the church and from young John, who was ten at the time. From that day on little “Jack” Kelsey was a marked boy and was called an “apostate” by his schoolmates. He often heard this epithet on the way to and from school, and was frequently forced to fight his Mormon schoolmates. John paid dearly for his father’s refusal to obey church elders, but he learned lessons that later stood him in good stead on the roads and in the mining camps of Montana.

“By 1880 Kelsey had enough of Utah life and set out for Montana. He bought a dead-axe wagon, drove to Red Rock, which was then at the end of the rail line, and engaged in hauling passengers and freight . . .”

Kelsey later became a stage driver who occasionally had to fight his passengers for the fares they owed him. One of them was an actor named Adams who traveled about the territory with his troupe. They played Sheridan, Montana as their first town, but Adams did not pay Kelsey, telling him he “would settle up” in Virginia City. There, however, Adams refused to pay. Kelsey challenged him for his fare and in the ensuing fight left the much larger actor on the floor. Kelsey ended up in the hands of the city marshal. He avoided jail and was awarded the money owed him by the judge who fined Adams for “trying to cheat the boy out of his fare.”

On another trip Kelsey and two passengers, men named Rafferty and Thompson, were set upon and robbed by highwaymen on the road between Deer Lodge and Helena. Preferring not to fight, the passengers threw their pistols in the brush.

On their arrival in Helena, one of the men, who had concealed his purse from the robbers, refused to pay Kelsey. That evening the stage driver confronted him as he sat playing cards at the Centennial Hotel with a large pile of chips before him. Kelsey put the man down and took his due from the table.

Later in life Kelsey became a bailiff for the Federal Court, a guard at the U.S. Marshal’s office, and a lookout for a gambling and bawdy house in Butte. He was still one tough customer, and his rifle continued to serve him well. Upon his retirement, Kelsey hung the Winchester on a rack of antlers above the fireplace in his home in Butte.

Early in their planning for the Model 1873, Winchester officials decided to market the rifle to shooters who were willing to pay for a high-quality, extremely accurate gun.

According to a note written in 1919 by George K. Walker, an early Winchester historian, the man primarily responsible for the 1 of 1000 program was James E. Stetson, a well-known precision shooter who worked for Winchester in the 1870s as a contractor supplying gun barrels.

He traveled throughout the country representing the company at tournaments and shooting matches, competing against other marksmen such as Wild West showman Doc Carver and Buffalo Bill Cody. Competitive rifle shooting at the time was a popular pastime, with many matches drawing thousands of people.

In 1873 Winchester announced a program to produce exceptionally accurate rifles that would sell for substantially more than their standard guns. A Model 1873 rifle in those days cost $17. The company manufactured 136 Model 1873 1 of 1000 rifles, which sold for $80 to $100 each.

That was a great deal of money back then, similar to a sportsman now paying $5,000 for a custom-made rifle. Rifles that were deemed slightly less accurate were sold as 1 of 100 guns for $60 to $75, depending on finish. In the same fashion these two grades of premium rifles were also produced in the Model 1876. 

At the Winchester plant, of every 100 rifles tested, the one with the most accurate barrel was set aside. This continued until 1,000 rifles had been judged. Then, of the ten that had been set aside, one was engraved as “1 of 1000” while the other nine were marked “1 of 100.”

Ultimately, Winchester only produced eight “1 of 100” rifles, which were listed in the 1875 catalog but never again advertised. Winchester realized that in promoting these extremely accurate rifles, they were implying that their standard guns were inferior. As one old Winchester worker stated, “Hell, they were all accurate!” Oliver F. Winchester, who was acutely aware of marketing and profits, soon dropped the program. 

These special rifles then fell into obscurity, known only to a few collectors and dealers until the release of the motion picture Winchester ’73 in 1950.

The movie relived the story of a rifle that had been used to win a target match, then was stolen and recovered only to be stolen again before it was returned to its rightful owner. Starring James Stewart, Shelley Winters and Dan Duryea, Winchester ’73 was well received by moviegoers and critics alike, and was named the Best Written American Western by the Writers Guild of America.

The film, partly based on fact, was popular not only with Winchester fans, but with gun collectors and those interested in the Old West.

Universal Pictures, in conjunction with Winchester Repeating Arms Company, conducted a nationwide search for Model 73 rifles and offered a new Model 1894 to the first 20 individuals who reported ownership of a 1 of 1000.  

More than 150,000 “WANTED!” posters were distributed nationwide to newspapers, radio stations and rifle clubs affiliated with the NRA, in addition to 20,000 chiefs of police. The search was extraordinarily successful and more than 20 Model 73 “1 of 1000s” were reported as well as six Model 1876 “1 of 1000s.” Although their existence was known, no Model 73 or Model 76 “1 of 100s” surfaced.

Universal Pictures and Winchester’s 1 of 1000 search clearly exceeded all expectations. Their program to advertise the motion picture stimulated the entire field of gun collecting and brought the Winchester rifles to the attention of collectors and the public at large.  

A final press release in the fall of 1950 by Universal Pictures publicist William Depperman reported the results of the search. It proved to be prophetic . . .

“From obscurity these unique ‘One of One Thousand’ Winchester Model 1873 rifles have graduated in only five months into one of the most sought after collector’s items in the country. Even garden variety Model 1873’s have doubled in price in the last few months.”

Depperman predicted the rifles would continue to increase in value (they have, and to levels he could hardly have imagined) and that the new interest in Winchesters would also generate great enthusiasm for gun collecting in general. 

Upon John Kelsey’s death in April, 1929, his gun was passed down to his grandson. The rifle resurfaced during the Winchester ’73 search and was one of the “discovery” rifles reported to Winchester and Universal Pictures at that time. 

The historic and detailed connection to a very colorful character of the Old West, who used a rifle as it was meant to be used, makes this Winchester more than just a fine gun. It’s an important link to our past and represents a part of our American heritage.

My interest in Winchester rifles began at age 15 when I purchased John Parson’s book, The First Winchester. I was fascinated by his stories of the early Winchester carbines and rifles, and the western characters and cowboys who used them. I was enchanted by Parson’s comments on, and illustrations of, the Winchester 1 of 1000s and 1 of 100s, but could only dream of having one. 

Years would pass before I was able to purchase my first Winchester, a beat-up Model 1876 that cost $10. This old gun ignited a collecting fire that has yet to be quenched. Many more years would go by before I acquired the Model 1876 1 of 100 rifle that is the subject of this story. 

I was determined to learn everything about the men who owned the rifle. Although my quest took several years, I succeeded in tracing every individual, 12 in all, including Sam Benham and John Kelsey. 

Of the eight Model 1876 1 of 100s presently known, John Kelsey’s rifle is by far the most historic. The 1 of 1,000 rifles were produced in greater numbers and are much less rare, though all of these premium Winchester rifles are extremely desirable and highly sought-after by collectors.

Because of its rarity, condition and provenance, John Kelsey’s rifle is now valued at more than $400,000. Benham, the original owner, paid $112.50 for it.

My ultimate dream in gun collecting was to own the quartet of both Model 1873 and 1876 1 of 1,000s and 1 of 100s. It took decades but I reached my goal and they’re illustrated in my book, The Story of the One of One Thousand and One of One Hundred Rifles. ‘