Categories
All About Guns The Green Machine You have to be kidding, right!?!

Coastal Defenses and The Endicott Era

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Gun Fearing Wussies You have to be kidding, right!?!

Experts expect California’s background checks for ammunition law to go to US Supreme Court sacramento By Kenny Choi

The war on regulation in California is escalating.

Gun violence prevention advocates say it’s saving lives, while gun rights supporters argue it’s regulation overkill.

“If you ask me if it was something that made shooting difficult, yes it was,” said Stolfi.

Stolfi is using a World War 2 era M-1 carbine for target practice.

“The imposition of needing a background check, and vendors not wanting to send ammunition to California, it became problematic for me to find this ammunition for this rifle with ease,” said Stolfi.

The Cloverdale resident has been buying gun powder and primers to hand load cartridges for many of his rifles since the tighter ammo restrictions were put in place.

Experts expect the case that is challenging state law requiring background checks for purchasing ammunition to go all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. For Bradley Stolfi, he supports common sense gun regulation.

“I think every firearm should require a background check and it should be thorough,” said Stolfi.

But a state law implemented in 2019 requiring in-person background checks for ammunition isn’t one of them.

Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" California Gun Fearing Wussies You have to be kidding, right!?!

Maybe, California To Require ANNUAL Firearm “Registration” Just Like Your Vehicle

Categories
A Victory! Allies

Idaho Bill Bans Public Contracts For Companies That Discriminate Against Gun Industry By Mark Chesnut

A measure recently introduced in the Idaho legislature seeks to keep companies that discriminate against firearms-related businesses or groups from receiving contracts from the state government.

Senate Bill 1291 was introduced in the state Senate earlier this week. The measure would prohibit public contracts with individuals or companies that are boycotting those that engage in or support the manufacture, distribution, sale or use of firearms, and would also require companies that contract with the state to disclose if their policies discriminate against the firearms industry.

Interestingly, the measure also includes the same protections for a few other industries that often find themselves in the crosshairs of so-called “progressives.”

Per the text of the measure, no company can be granted a state contract if it is engaged in, or plans to engage in, a boycott of any individual or company because the individual or company: “(a) Engages in or supports the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale or manufacture of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, minerals, hydroelectric power, nuclear energy or agriculture; or (b) Engages in or supports the manufacture, distribution, sale or use of firearms, as defined in section 18-3302(2)(d), Idaho Code.”

As the legislation’s language explains, “boycott” means, “without a reasonable business purpose, refusing to deal with an individual or organization, terminating business with an individual or organization, or taking another action that is intended to penalize, inflict economic harm on, or limit commercial relations with an individual or organization because the individual or organization: (i) Engages in a particular business sector; (ii) Engages in a particular business sector and does not commit or pledge to meet standards beyond applicable federal and state law; or (iii) Does business with an individual or organization that engages in a particular business sector.”

If the legislation passes, it will be in effect for contracts executed on or after July 1, 2024. As for contracts issued before that date, the legislation states: “Any contract executed prior to July 1, 2024, that violates the provisions of this section shall not be renewed unless the contracting authority obtains the written certification described in subsection (1) of this section.”

The measure will first be considered in the Senate State Affairs Committee.

 

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Marine Left for Dead in Mojave Desert Sparks Internal Investigation

Categories
A Victory! Darwin would of approved of this! Well I thought it was funny!

BEST DAD EVER!!!

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

God has a wicked sense of humor at times

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

They also said, they would tell us if a missile launch was detected. Then we found out that with only 32 minutes warning, they wouldn’t. I guess they thought the panic it would cause, might impede them from getting to protection.

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

THE DUELING DOCTORS OF TRANSYLVANIA WRITTEN BY JEFF “TANK” HOOVER

A pair of your typical dueling pistols.

We’ve all heard the axiom “an armed society is a polite society,” and this was no more apparent during the early 1800s. For better or worse, severe disagreements were settled on the “field of honor” by the most stubborn of those willing to risk life or limb. While it wasn’t uncommon for doctors to attend these deadly duels, they usually did so in supportive roles of providing care for the duelists. It was indeed rare for doctors to be active participants in such shenanigans.

Normally, of course, doctors save lives. But in 1818, brawls between doctors were alarmingly common. However, not all of them ended like this one, in a duel with pistols. One doctor in Philadelphia during that era agonizingly stated how his colleagues “lived in an almost constant state of warfare.”

Too Many?

The reason for this warfare was simple, competition. The United States then turned out five times as many doctors per capita as some European countries, so there was fierce competition for patients. Doctors beat each other bloody all the time for stealing business.

But, this duel in 1818 was especially noteworthy. It kicked off a series of events that led to the formation of the most powerful medical society in the United States.

Dr. Benjamin Dudley

Dr. William Richardson

The Stage

Initially, the dispute was between Dr. Dudley and Dr. Drake. The two disagreed over the methods Dudley used during an autopsy. Words were exchanged, and tempers flared until Dr. Dudley felt insulted beyond reason and challenged Dr. Drake to a duel.

Dr. Drake opposed duels for settling differences, so his friend Dr. Richardson accepted in his place. A date was set, and a strategic location was chosen. For at this time, dueling was illegal. While the loser had to deal with potentially fatal consequences, the winner was usually arrested.

A Fine Line…

On a warm early August morning, the combatants, along with their chosen surgeons and attendants, as well as a few close friends, adjourned to the famous dueling sight of central Kentucky. It was only 6.5 miles west of Lexington, home of Transylvania Medical school.

After arriving on the grounds, the combatants coldly bowed to each other while their assistants loaded pistols, measured the ground and tossed a coin for choice of position and the right to give the word. You know, your typical pre-duel preparation. The adversaries stared intently at each other until they were given the word to “FIRE!”

Dr. Dudley was unscathed, but Dr. Richardson fell to the ground with a life-threatening wound in the groin. Bleeding profusely and needing immediate assistance to survive, his attending doctor could not stop the blood flow. So, in an ironic turnaround, Dr. Dudley offered his assistance, stopped the bleeding and sewed the severed artery, and saved Dr. Richardson’s life. How’s that for a way of drumming up business? Think he billed him for his efforts?

This location of the duel is special indeed, having a built-in “get out of jail” defense for the winner. The duel’s location was held on the Fayette and Scott County line. Each combatant was standing in a different county during the duel, meaning each was in a different jurisdiction. They could not be legally charged with dueling, hence making their duel legal.

This location is partially on the Walnut Hall Farm, which still stands today.

The American Medical Association

The 1818 duel between doctors Dudley and Richardson was especially noteworthy for having kicked off a series of events that led to the formation of the most powerful medical society in the United States.

That’s right. The American Medical Association itself traces back to this scuzzy skirmish and the backlash it provoked to find, somehow, some way to prevent doctor-on-doctor murder.

Some physicians began calling meetings in the mid-1840s to discuss starting a club — an open one, to discuss differences. Finally, in 1847, the American Medical Association was founded for several reasons. One was regulating the crazy treatments common for the day, which were flourishing then. But beyond those medical concerns, the association’s constitution explicitly addressed the need to “foster … friendly intercourse between doctors.”

Today, the AMA is a powerhouse — one of the most respected institutions in the world. Ultimately, though, we can trace its origins back to a bloody duel from 1818. As Paul Harvey would say, now you know the rest of the story. Perhaps the AMA logo should be a pair of crossed dueling pistols?

Categories
War You have to be kidding, right!?!

Nice to know that I live on one of the primary nuclear targets & hopefully it would be quick.

As I do not to live in the new Dark Ages that would follow for the survivors! Grumpy