Categories
All About Guns

A Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 in caliber 22 LR

Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 2
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 3
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 4
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 5
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 6
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 7
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 8
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 9
Smith & Wesson Model-41 22 Pistol 5 1/2 Heavy Barrel Circa 1972-73 .22 LR - Picture 10

 

Categories
All About Guns

M1 Carbine: A Whole New Class of Weapon

Categories
Uncategorized

I say chain saw if there are no witnesses or cameras around!

May be an image of outdoors, tree and text that says 'THE SHTF AND YOU ARE BUGGING OUT WHEN YOU COME ACROSS THIS MOVE ON OR MOVE AROUND?'

Categories
All About Guns

A S&W Model 53 wheel gun chambered in .22 Jet magnum

Categories
All About Guns Allies Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

Victorian (Canada) shooters to face 10 year gun bans for stepping out of line BY NEIL JENKINS

The Andrews Government is making more bad changes to Victoria’s gun laws.

The latest changes will allow police down to the rank of inspector to ban shooters from holding firearm licences for at least 10 years – for getting nothing more than a speeding fine.

People hit with a ban will also be subjected to warrantless searches of their homes or cars at any time, and barred from going to any place where guns may be stored or used.

This is a major backward step for shooters – but the good news is that the NSC is well placed to fight this, which is why we need your help.

Who will be able to impose the bans?

The legislation that was introduced into the Victorian State Parliament by the state’s Police Minister, Lisa Neville (pictured above), is called the Firearms and Other Acts Amendment Bill 2021.

As it stands, the bill proposes that the bans will be able to be put in place by officers at inspector level.

This includes inspectors in the firearms registry.

Ban includes warrantless searches and other restrictions

Once a ban is in place, the laws will allow any police officer to search the shooter, their home, their car or any person with the shooter, without a warrant.

How it would work

Imagine if you received a COVID or speeding fine.

From previous experience, Victoria Police has seen these as being sufficient to suspend firearms licences.

The new bans would permit bad ‘behaviour‘ – potentially simply having an argument over the fine or suspension – to be sufficient for an inspector to hit you with a ban.

This would subject you to searches until 2032 – and you would not be able to appeal the ban until 2027.

All for copping a simple fine.
Or for no reason at all.

It also means you can’t go anywhere firearms are used or stored – which may be your local range, gunshop or even a friend’s or relative’s home where firearms are stored.

You also cannot change address without risking a year in jail if you don’t notify the police within 24 hours of moving.

You will also have no right of appeal for at least the first five years of the 10 year ban.

Could you get a ban?

The bill before Parliament will allow officers to impose bans for any of the following reasons

  • “because of the behaviour of the individual” – the legislation does not define what ‘behaviour’ means, and so comes down to the officer’s personal opinion. What is clear from the legislation is that this behaviour does not need to relate to anything illegal.
  • “because of the people with whom the individual associates” – which means people Victoria Police do not like. Again, this does not need to relate to anything illegal.
  • “because of the criminal history of the individual” – which sounds ok but again the lack of definition means it could apply to very old history – such as minor offences conducted as a teenager; and
  • “because, on the basis of information known to the Chief Commissioner about the individual, the individual may pose a threat or risk to public safety.” – again, this is vague and open to abuse.

It means if an officer of Victoria Police does not like your ‘behaviour’, you could easily find yourself getting one of Lisa Neville’s new bans.

Copping a COVID fine, for instance.

Key questions you might have about this

Here’s what you can do

There are two things you can do to help us fight this, especially with a state election in Victoria due next year.

The first is you can make our voice stronger by becoming a member. In fact if you are a Victorian who wants these laws scrapped, then you really don’t have any other options.

HELP US GET CHANGE

Let Victoria’s Police Minister know that the changes to the state’s gun laws are not on. Click the orange box to send her an email now!

(This should open your email program, if you have one. It might take a couple of seconds to open for you)

We’ve FOI’d the government about consultation

The NSC has already put a Freedom of Information request into the Government to see which shooting organisations may have supported these laws – or alternatively if there was no consultation at all.

We’ll let you know what the result is.

Extension of recent laws

The bans are an extension of laws the government introduced in 2018 but were limited to being put in place by superintendents. Called Firearm Prohibition Orders, they were originally touted as being aimed at criminals, and bikie gangs.

At the time, Liberties Victoria expressed real concern over how the laws would be applied.

However those concerns were ignored – and the proposal is to delegate the laws further down in VicPol, making it easier for them to be used against almost anyone.

It’s why shooters who supported Labor at the last election need to change their vote.

Categories
Well I thought it was funny!

Sure enough!

Categories
All About Guns

Top 10 Things New Gun Owners Need To Know

Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft

He would know that is for sure!

May be an image of 1 person and text that says '"Fast is fine but accuracy is final. must learn to be slow in Y" a hurry." -Wyatt Earp'

Categories
All About Guns

Colt Monitor: The First Official FBI Fighting Rifle

Categories
Allies Soldiering Well I thought it was neat!

Indian soldiers of Dunkirk By Sudha G Tilak

Leave party at Woking Mosque, 10 May 1940. Major Akbar is in the centre, in uniform, bareheaded. He has written in the names of many of the soldiersIMAGE SOURCE,PRIVATE COLLECTION
image caption Maj Akbar Khan, bareheaded, in the center and in uniform, and other Indian soldiers

The remarkable evacuation of Allied troops from Dunkirk was a pivotal moment in World War Two. What is not well known is the story of nearly 300 Indian soldiers who were also part of the contingent.

Over the course of nine days in May 1940, more than 338,000 Allied forces were evacuated from the beach and harbour at the French port city of Dunkirk as the German military bore down on them.

In this sea of European servicemen was Major Mohammad Akbar Khan, an Indian soldier.

On 28 May, he led 300 Indian soldiers and 23 British troops in an orderly column along the bombed-out harbour to the East Mole, the nearly mile-long wooden jetty which featured in Christopher Nolan’s epic 2017 film, Dunkirk.

The imposing 183cm (6ft) tall soldier returned to India after the war and later became a senior officer in the new Pakistan army when British-ruled India was divided into India and Pakistan in August 1947. He was made a military aide to Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the man who founded Pakistan, wrote more than 40 books, and met Chairman Mao on a visit to China.

Indian soldiers like Major Akbar who were evacuated from Dunkirk have been completely forgotten, according to British historian Ghee Bowman. He spent five years in five countries, tracking down lost archives and photographs from family albums and talking to descendants of the soldiers.

The Indian soldiers belonged to the 25th Animal Transport Company, who had travelled 7,000 miles (11,265 km) with their mules to help the British army. All but four of them were Muslim.

Hexley and Ashraf ‘swinging along Broad St’ in Birmingham, summer 1941IMAGE SOURCE,PRIVATE COLLECTION
image captionIndian soldiers marching in Birmingham in 1941
1px transparent line

They wore khaki, tin helmets, caps and pagris (turbans). They carried no weapons, because none had been issued when they left Punjab six months before they landed in France.

In the bitter winter in France, the British army needed mules to replace motorised vehicles to carry supplies. But as they lacked “animal-handling skills”, the Indian troops were deployed to help them.

Some five million Commonwealth servicemen joined the military services of the British Empire during the war. Almost half of them were from South Asia. What happened with the Indian soldiers in Dunkirk has been unclear.

“The story of these soldiers and their comrades is one of the great untold stories of the war,” said Mr Bowman, author, most recently of The Indian Contingent: The Forgotten Muslim Soldiers of the Battle of Dunkirk.

Take, for example, Chaudry Wali Mohammad, who later recounted that “German planes [were] like terrible birds flying overheard and firing on us… I did not sleep for 15 days”. He and his contingent reached Dunkirk on 23 May.

“We didn’t think we would come out of Dunkirk alive… Everything was on fire. The whole of Dunkirk was alight. There were so many fires it was like daylight…

“The ship we were supposed to board was sunk. We got down to the beach and found the ship had sunk, so then we had to run back to the woods,” he later recalled. Two days later, Mohammad and his troops were evacuated.

Then there was Jemadar Maula Dad Khan who was feted for showing “magnificent courage, coolness and decision” in protecting his men and animals when they were shelled from the ground and strafed from the air by the enemy.

“I don’t think the significance of Indian soldiers lies in their numbers. It’s in the simple fact that they were there, as Indians, as citizens of the Empire, with a maulvi [Muslim priest] and pagris, and a whole different way of looking at the world,” Mr Bowman said.

Kundan Lall, Herbert Foster, Betty Foster and three unidentified sepoys at the Fosters’ house near Shirley, autumnIMAGE SOURCE,PRIVATE COLLECTION
image captionIndian soldiers at a British resident’s home near Shirley, England
1px transparent line

These men had spent much of 1940 in a village in northern France, just north of the city of Lille. Braving a biting winter, they exercised and fed their mules. They met local villagers, charming packed audiences with their “weekly gymkhanas where they performed tricks on mule back and danced bhangra [an energetic folk dance from Punjab]”.

Things changed rapidly in May when the Germans attacked France, and “within a space of two weeks, from being part of a well-ordered, disciplined, multi-national army, the soldiers were part of a chaotic retreat to the coast”, says Mr Bowman.

On reaching Dover, the historian says, they played Punjabi folk music, upon which even “many British spectators joined in the dance”.

They were welcomed into British homes and hearts, and had a set of toy soldiers reproduced after them.

Their lives had changed as they travelled from India to villages and towns across Britain and France until they returned home after the end of the war. Some were captured by Germans and held in prisoner of war camps in France, Germany, Italy and Poland.

Types Of Indian Soldiers Being Inspected By Their Officer. This series of pictures were taken of the B.E.F Indian troops "somewhere in England"; many of them have just arrived back from Dunkirk under the charge of Major Wainwright and Major Jermyn, two British officers. (IMAGE SOURCE,HULTON DEUTSCH/GETTY IMAGES
image captionNearly 300 Indian soldiers were evacuated from Dunkirk
1px transparent line

Then why were these soldiers forgotten in the books and films of what Winston Churchill, Britain’s prime minister during World War Two, called a “miracle of deliverance” in a famed speech in 1940?

One reason, according to Mr Bowman, could be that they were “involved in the business of supply, not front-line fighting, and such support troops are rarely remembered”.

“Public memory and public forgetting are fascinating processes, it’s hard to put your finger on all the reasons,” Mr Bowman says.

“The post-war environment was a very different one, in Europe and in India. In Europe there was a need for physical reconstruction and for building new societies. The focus was on the future, and the elements of the war that lived on in popular memory were taken from a narrow field, usually involving those with white faces and posh backgrounds.

“In India, the process leading to independence and partition took precedence. History is always a moving and unfolding process.”

Sudha G Tilak is a journalist and author of Temple Tales: Secrets and Stories from India’s Sacred Places