Author: Grumpy
Categories
L4: The Bren in 7.62mm NATO
What is the reason that we prepare? What is our ultimate justification for what we’re doing?
If you watch “Doomsday Preppers” or some other show on TV, the answer would seem to be that it’s because we’re crazy. They selected people and edited the clips to make them look crazy, which led to years of people laughing at preparedness.
This last year has changed the public perception of preparedness.
So, then, why do we do it?
The ultimate reason, when you break it down completely, is FREEDOM. We prepare so that we are SELF RELIANT and don’t have to trust anyone else to come to our rescue. The evidence is clear in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, the midwest floods, and the Texas weather outages, that the government is going ride over the hill to save you about an hour after you’ve already died.
How does this view of being self-reliant match up with the Ultimate Tactical Handbook?
It is for freedom that Christ has set us free.
Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves
Be burdened again by a yoke of slavery.
Galatians 5:1
Seems clear: Be self-reliant. You are your own rescuer, protector, and provider.
When you look at the riots over the spring and summer of 2020, you will realize that the police are not coming to protect you. In fact, the Supreme Court case of Castle Rock v Gonzales says they have no duty to protect you. In Portland, when both the far right and the far left faced off in the streets, the Portland Police Bureau admitted that they were not capable of protecting the city when the two factions fought each other. This will be more common in 2021, so be prepared to fend for yourself.
When people in New Orleans relied on the government to come to their rescue, they found that rather than feeding everyone, the government’s first response was to go door-to-door and seize 551 firearms, all of which were lawfully owned. Then they forcibly relocated people to the SuperDome, where they were actually at greater risk. There was a shortage of food & water at the SuperDome, and crime was rampant inside.
So, again, relying on ourselves is good, but not merely good enough.
Let’s say I lived in New Orleans, and I had stored up 120 days of food and water, I had secured my house, obtained personal protection firearms, and had my own generator. Sounds prepared, right?
Well, on day 4, while I was getting ready to make lunch, our good friend General Russell Honore and his troops arrived at my house and demanded entry. They flashed emergency orders, and seized my firearms for “security & safekeeping”, then declared that they were seizing my food and generator under the emergency order. They then put me and my family in a truck and drove us to the SuperDome.
Did my preparedness help?
Inside the SuperDome, food and water began to run out and the National Guard began to ration it. Recovered bodies from the surrounding area began to pile up, and in an emergency, live people plus a lot of dead bodies equals illness. Three people died inside the SuperDome from various causes. Does that sound like people you should rely on?
What does this mean for preparedness folks who live in a city and plan on “bugging in”? I can’t answer that for YOU, but for me, if I had remained in the city, and the government showed up, I’d follow Galations 5:1 and not let myself be burdened with a yoke of slavery. Relying on someone else to feed, house, and protect you is SLAVERY.
The best advice I can give is to have a plan that allows you to either hide yourself and your gear effectively, or a plan that allows you to leave undetected in a hurry. The best of both worlds is to have hidden most of your supplies and have the means to leave quickly and hide for a day or two, until you can come back safely.
In Clay Martin’s excellent book on urban preparedness, Concrete Jungle, he describes how to do these things, and I highly recommend it (see link below).
If you plan on bugging in, you need to start NOW on Operational Security (OPSEC). Telling the world all about your preparations will make you a target. Many people think “My neighbors won’t take my stuff” or “My Facebook friends would never steal from me”. Those people underestimate the power of hunger. Hungry people, or people with children on the edge of starvation, will act very differently than they do now. They may show up and demand food, or band together and take food.
Even worse, when the troops take them to a relocation camp, and offer them extra food in exchange for reporting “hoarders” or “people hiding guns”, people WILL report you, if they know.
In preparedness, I see lots of people talking about how, after an event, when bugging in, they’ll fortify their house. A fortified house looks like a fortified house. When hungry people, or people intent on looting, see a fortified house, they think “there’s good stuff in there”. It’s far better to make your house look unoccupied or unremarkable in any way.
I know, folks like us love to fly our American flag right next to the “Come and Take It” flag. We are already seeing ANTIFA target houses flying either of those flags, so what do you think will happen post-event? Oh, you’ll take it down then, after the event and when the WROL situation exists?
What if I told you that the left is already preparing for mass violence, and recording addresses they suspect? THEY ARE.
This last weekend, the Young Social Democrat Association had booths set up in Washington state. There was literature on the tables about setting up “Community Emergency Response Teams”. These teams would be comprised of armed personnel for “community self-defense” as well as medics. Do you think you’re part of the community they’ll defend?
It’s interesting that they avoided using the term “militia”, but an armed “community self defense” group is INDEED a militia.
They told these groups to form and begin establishing “safe houses” and gathering information. By gathering information, they mean identifying anyone who isn’t a radical socialist for “redistribution”. Make no mistake, their preparedness plan is to seize your supplies and redistribute them to each other. They are already forcibly taking over neighborhoods and buildings, and we aren’t even fully into a WROL situation.
Keep your bug-in location as low-key as possible, and if a WROL situation develops, take the same position as The Rooftop Koreans did, and be ready to defend your stuff.
During the LA Riots of 1992, the Korean business community suffered the most loses. Over 2,300 businesses owned by Koreans were destroyed (half of all property damage). When they realized that the police wouldn’t be able to get help to them for over a week, the Rooftop Koreans banded together, armed themselves and began manning the roofs of their business. For several days they exchanged gunfire with looters, but they didn’t lose anymore buildings. Not a single Korean was charged with a crime.
Keep your preparations low key, have a way to hide them, and retain your ability to move out quickly, even if it’s only temporarily. Retain also the ability to defend yourself.
Operational Security means making sure that only the people who need to know are aware of your plans. This applies to every area of life, not just preparedness. Americans put a ridiculous amount of information on social media for everyone to see. People brag about leaving for a two-week vacation, not realizing the OPSEC error in telling people that your home is now unoccupied and you are out of the country.
Make sure you keep your circle of people who know your preparedness plans small. If you join a mutual aid group (see, I didn’t say militia or community self defense team), keep the group small. You need enough people in your group to be able to band together and defend each other, but not so many that a full leadership organization is required. Once you set up some type of large hierarchy, the potential exists for one person to force others to give things up.
Remember our goal, self-reliance and individual freedom.
But, every group needs leader, so what do we do? We take a lesson from the military organizations of 1700s. In the 1700s, and most of the 1800s, military units elected their officers. In a small, 4-5 family mutual aid organization, that’s a simple and effective way to handle it.
In a WROL situation, there won’t be any “lone wolf” people after 30 days. Find a group of like minded people and organize now.
I hope this helped you remember why we prepare, and gave you some ideas for be self-reliant. Most importantly, I hope it inspired you to remember that we ARE a free people, and the government doesn’t really have the authority to tell us where we can go and how many of us can gather at once.
If you’d like to help us keep up our work here, consider making a donation.
Donation – March 2021
Donation to help us produce content.
$5.00
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| . |
Categories
The Owen Gun : WW2 SMG
Authored by Jack Phillips via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours),
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) on Thursday introduced a ban on more than 200 “assault weapons” after the House passed two gun-control measures pertaining to background checks.
Her bill (pdf), called the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2021,” is co-sponsored by 34 Senate Democrats and would ban ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds—similar to the bans on magazines in New York state and California.
According to the legislation, which was also introduced in the House by Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), the ban would encompass more than 205 rifles. Feinstein’s bill would allow current owners of the guns to retain possession of them. If that gun is transferred, a person has to undergo an FBI background check before getting the firearm.
The bill also bans any weapon that has the capacity to use a magazine that isn’t a fixed ammunition magazine and has one or more characteristics such as a pistol grip, forward grip, a threaded barrel, a folding or telescoping stock, or a barrel shroud.
The bill “requires that grandfathered assault weapons are stored using a secure gun storage or safety device like a trigger lock” and prohibits the transfer of high-capacity ammunition magazines while banning “bump-fire stocks and other devices that allow semi-automatic weapons to fire at fully automatic rates,” according to a news release from Feinstein’s office. Bump-fire stocks were made illegal in March 2019.
“It’s been 17 years since the original Assault Weapons Ban expired, and the plague of gun violence continues to grow in this country. To be clear, this bill saves lives. When it was in place from 1994-2004, gun massacres declined by 37 percent compared with the decade before. After the ban expired, the number of massacres rose by 183 percent,” Feinstein said in a statement Thursday.
There are more than 20 million modern sporting rifles owned by private citizens, according to the National Shooting Sports Foundation, as reported by pro-Second Amendment website Bearingarms.com.
Republicans and gun-rights groups have said proposals from Feinstein, who has long advocated for gun control, are unconstitutional and won’t prevent firearms from getting in the hands of criminals.
“Law-abiding Americans use them for every type of lawful purpose, including personal and home defense, hunting, marksmanship competitions, and recreational target practice,” stated the National Rifle Association (NRA) when Feinstein attempted to introduce the bill in 2019. “Needless to say, however, the modern criminal element will not be playing by the antiquated rules that Feinstein hopes to apply to the rest of us,” the group asserted.
On Thursday, the House passed two Democratic-backed gun control measures, including one would that would expand background checks to those purchasing weapons over the internet, at gun shows, and through certain private transactions. Only eight Republicans joined the Democrats in backing the bill.
The second bill, passed 219-210 with only two Republicans supporting it, would give authorities 10 business days for federal background checks to be completed before a gun sale can be licensed.
Reuters contributed to this report.
The U.S. House Representatives, with the urging and support of Joe Biden, passed two bills on Thursday – H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446 – that would usher in a sweeping overhaul of how firearms are bought and sold in the U.S. Neither would impede criminals, who overwhelmingly obtain their firearms outside normal channels of lawful commerce. But together they would transform the constitutionally protected right to obtain firearms into a privilege administered at the whim of anti-gun bureaucrats.
To understand why these bills are so consequential, it’s important to understand how retail firearm sales work under existing federal law.
Currently, the primary means by which the federal government regulates firearms is through a network of licensed dealers (FFLs) making commercial sales. Anyone who repetitively engages in firearm sales for livelihood and profit is required to become an FFL. Failure to do so is already a federal felony. So when the media mentions “unlicensed dealers,” they’re actually talking about criminals, not people falling into a legal “loophole.”
Anyone buying a gun from an FFL must first go through a computerized, point-of-sale background check administered by the FBI. This check, which is supposed to be instant, searches several national databases to determine if a would-be buyer falls into any statutorily-defined category of “prohibited persons,” which include such things as felons, people who have been committed to a mental institution, and illegal aliens.
If the search does not turn up a disqualifying record, the system notifies the dealer to proceed. Sometimes, however, the records are unclear, and a response cannot be provided immediately. This results in a delay of up to three business days to allow the FBI to conduct additional research.
If the FBI still has not resolved the check within that three business day period, the FFL has the option (but not a requirement) to proceed with the sale, provided he or she has no reason to believe the buyer is prohibited. This is known as a default transfer.
The system is structured this way not because of some inadvertent loophole but as an intentional safeguard to protect Americans’ constitutional right to obtain firearms.
As with any constitutional right, the burden is on the government to justify a restriction, which in the case of a background check means the FBI must be able to locate a disqualifying record before it blocks a sale. The three day default transfer window ensures the government maintains the burden of proof, provides a specific timeframe to resolve incomplete checks, incentivizes the FBI to administer the system efficiently, and ensures legal transfers are not subject to extended delays.
Without the automatic default transfer option, the FBI could block even legal firearm sales, simply by refusing to complete the check.
Private individuals who are not selling firearms with the principle objective of livelihood and profit can make occasional transfers, sales, loans, or gifts of firearms without becoming an FFL. They cannot, however, transfer a firearm to anyone who they have reason to believe is legally prohibited from buying firearms. Private individuals also have the option (but not the requirement) to process a private transfer using the services of an FFL, with the attendant background check and record-keeping required of the dealer for a commercial sale.
The bills passed by the House last week would – in the case of H.R. 8 – presumptively ban any private transfer of a firearm, including loans and gifts, as well as – in the case of H.R. 1446 – eliminate the automatic three day default transfer period for dealer sales.
This means that every time a firearm changed hands, the transfer would have to be processed by an FFL, which would involve fees, background checks, and government-accessible paperwork documenting the sale. Friends and neighbors could no longer freely loan, sell, or trade firearms amongst the people they know and trust. Even some family members could no longer share firearms with each other.
Handing a firearm over to someone without hiring an FFL to facilitate the exchange would be a federal crime under H.R. 8, unless you could show the situation fell into certain narrow and confusing exceptions. For example, you could loan someone a gun for self-defense, but only if the person was actually under attack at the time. You could not loan someone a firearm as a safeguard against danger that had not yet materialized.
Making matters worse, H.R. 1446 would empower the FBI to indefinitely delay a firearm sale or transfer, simply by failing to complete the “instant” check that would now be mandatory for EVERY non-exempt transfer. There would be no automatic default transfer window. Instead, it would be up to the intended recipient of the gun to appeal a delayed background check and ask – for the second time – for an answer from the FBI.
If the FBI failed to answer this SECOND request for a resolution to the background check, the dealer would have to wait an additional 10 business days before deciding whether to transfer the gun. So, at a minimum, H.R. 1446 would allow the FBI to arbitrarily impose an extended delay, even in the case where a person stood on his or her rights by appealing the FBI’s non-answer to the check. If the person did not appeal, there would be NO option for the dealer to transfer the gun, even though the FBI had not shown the transfer was illegal.
Taken together, these bills transform the right to obtain firearms into a privilege administered at the say-so of the government. They also set the stage for a universal registry of gun owners and the transformation of the current “shall-issue” paradigm for FFL transfers to eligible buyers into a “may-issue” system where the FBI can block sales on a case-by-case basis as they see fit.
Arch anti-gun Senator Chuck Schumer has already promised that the legislation will get a vote in the Senate, where the margin for victory or defeat is razor thin.
That is why every freedom-loving American must contact their senators NOW and firmly but respectfully demand that they vote NO on H.R. 8 and H.R. 1446.
Giving the government total authority to document and oversee the movement of every legal gun in America is a recipe for a crackdown on law-abiding gun owners, while leaving criminals operating outside the bounds of the law untouched.
Do not delay. Make your voice heard TODAY or suffer the potential loss of your rights tomorrow! Contact your U.S. Senators Now!