Categories
All About Guns

Grandpa Shows Off His Hunting Rifle

Categories
War Well I thought it was neat!

The Hitler Captured at Stalingrad

Categories
Well I thought it was neat!

Did People Ever Actually Throw Down a Gauntlet? Or Is That a Modern Myth?

Categories
All About Guns Well I thought it was funny!

New Baby, New Gun

Categories
All About Guns

S&W Model 17 Combat Masterpiece

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

.50 BMG vs GIRAFFE | Getting scoped by a .50 BMG

Categories
All About Guns

JAGDPANTHER – Firing the main 88mm Gun.

Categories
N.S.F.W.

Somebody stole this poor womans clothes! NSFW

Tumblr media

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Cops

Intruder Shot When 80-Year-Old Victim Fights Back! by KIMBER PEARCE

Intruder Shot When 80-Year-Old Victim Fights Back! - Gun Reviews and News |  GunsAmerica.com/Digest

A peaceful Chicago neighborhood received a shock last month when an 80-year-old man defended his home from two intruders.

The homeowner, who is a holder of a valid FOID card, was inside his home in the 8500 block of West Catherine when two individuals knocked on his door at 10:30 am. Upon opening it, the intruders, a man and woman, forcibly entered the home and a scuffle ensued.

However, the determined homeowner didn’t give up without a fight and managed to fire a shot, striking the man in the chest. The second intruder, the woman, escaped unharmed.

The homeowner sustained several injuries in the altercation, including a severe head injury, and Fox32 reports that he was rushed to Resurrection Hospital in critical condition.

The two perpetrators fled the scene but eventually sought medical treatment at the same hospital. The perp who was shot was admitted in critical condition. Since then the police have gained custody of both intruders. Charges are still pending.

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends"

The Firearms Industry is Given a Win by Biden-Appointed Judge in New Jersey by MATTYP

Gov. Phil Murphy
Gov. Phil Murphy (Photo: Murphy/Twitter)

U.S. District Court Judge Zahid Quraishi, a Biden appointee, killed a new law that was widely celebrated by anti-gun Liberals and Democrats. The law would have allowed the state to shut down, and likely bankrupt, the firearms industry if a single gun were misused in a crime.

The Federal Judge said that he agreed with the gun industry that the New Jersey law was likely unconstitutional and granted the National Shooting Sports Foundation a preliminary injunction.

In a 20-page opinion, the Judge said that the New Jersey law signed last summer by Gov. Phil Murphy ignored a larger federal law (the PLCAA) that protects the makers of guns, and other items, from being dragged into court when somebody misuses their product.

Here’s a recap of Gov. Phil Murphy’s package of anti-gun measures:

(Photo: Gov. Murphy)

Judge Quraishi said that the federal 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) gives immunity to gun and ammo makers and sellers against the types of public nuisance laws Murphy championed.

“The court is mindful that firearms are inherently dangerous and even more so in the wrong hands,” wrote the judge, “but it is also mindful that the PLCAA embodies Congress’s earnest effort to balance those dangers against the national interest in protecting access to firearms.”

Mark Oliva, the spokesman for the National Shooting Sports Foundation, told a Washington Examiner reporter, “It’s a basic understanding of tort law. It’s the foundation of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, that anyone that criminally misuses a firearm or a product is responsible for the damages caused by their crime, not the person that lawfully made, lawfully sold that product.”

In an initial filing last November, the NSSF said the New Jersey law “is squarely preempted by federal law. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, several state and local governments sought to use novel applications of common law theories like negligence and nuisance to impose civil liability on manufacturers and sellers of firearms and ammunition when third parties misused their products. Congress saw these lawsuits for what they were: unconstitutional efforts to stamp out lawful and constitutionally protected activity.”