Author: Grumpy
.jpg)
Maryland’s Aberdeen Proving Ground opened in 1917 and today is the military’s oldest weapons-testing facility in the United States. It’s a big operation. At its peak in World War II, Aberdeen had housing for more than 27,000, and today it still employs more then 12,000 people.
Through its first decades Aberdeen was a man’s world. But that changed during World War II. LIFE covered extensively the real-life Rosie the Riveters who moved into industrial jobs during that era, and the women who became weapons-testers for the first time in Aberdeen were part of that same phenomenon.
The story in LIFE’s Feb. 1, 1943 issue described how the soldiers who once worked the testing grounds but had been deployed overseas were at first replaced by male civilians. Then “as the draft hit hard, the civilians began to disappear and in their place came thousands of women.”
And who were these women?
The women come from everywhere. Many have husbands in the Army. Others have husbands who also work at Aberdeen. They wear bright-colored slacks, and their “firing fronts” are a rippling blend of pink. blue and orange, mixed with white and black powder from the guns. They serve on crews of all weapons up to the 90-mm A.A.’s. [anti-aircraft guns]. They handle highly technical instruments. They drive trucks, act as bicycle messengers, swab and clean vehicles. A few of them have even been tested as tank drivers, but that work, with its physical bruises, is still a little too tough for them.
The declaration of that last sentence reflected a time when women were making their first inroads to military service. In 1942 the WACs had just come into being (see LIFE’s coverage of the first WACs here) and the change in attitudes about what roles women could play was slow and incremental. It was not until 2015 that the Department of Defense opened all military occupations and positions to women.
The photographs by Myron Davis and Bernard Hoffman capture a world in transition. Some pictures indulge in the novelty of the moment—such as the photo of a woman who looks like a schoolmarm set up behind the sites of a machine gun with an ammunition belt being fed through it. But in other photos the women, such as Mrs. Ruby Barnett, a grandmother who had never fired a gun before coming to work at Aberdeen, look right at home in their new jobs. Those pictures seem to ask the question about the women taking on this new line of work: Well, why not?
A woman tested a 30 caliber machine gun at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Women loaded shells into an anti-aircraft gun at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Myron Davis/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A group of men and women tested a 90 mm anti-aircraft gun at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds in Maryland, 1942.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Viola Testerman carried a 41-pound shell at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, 1942.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Betty Wainwright and Opal Burchette fed cartridges into magazines at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Nealie Bare at work at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942. Here she hammered a plug into a test shell to keep the shell’s sand from running out.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mrs. Ruby Barnett, a grandmother, had never fired a gun before coming to work at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland during World War II.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mrs. Ruby Barnett at work at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, 1942.
Myron Davis/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mrs. Ruby Barnett was among the women who tested artillery at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Myron Davis/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Mrs. Ruby Barnett, a grandmother, tested a carbine at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Women fired machine guns at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Myron Davis/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Women tested machine guns at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Myron Davis/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A woman loaded a bullet aircraft cannon at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Myron Davis/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
A women tested a 20 millimeter aircraft cannon at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Myron Davis/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
Aerial view of testing range at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, 1942.
Bernard Hoffman/Life Picture Collection/Shutterstock
In a significant ruling, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals announced on Thursday that New Jersey possesses the authority to sue firearm manufacturers under its “public nuisance” law. This comes as a substantial victory for the ant-freedom state and its ongoing efforts to gut public safety amidst the backdrop of gun rights affirmation by the U.S. Supreme Court.
From Fox News:
“A three-judge panel on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously ruled that a legal challenge brought against the law by the National Sports Shooting Foundation (NSSF) was premature. Though the court acknowledged the law is somewhat vague about what conduct can trigger a lawsuit from the state, it nevertheless said the firearms industry “jumped the gun” by filing a legal challenge before demonstrating injury. “
Although New Jersey’s “public nuisance” legislation was signed into law by Democratic Governor Phil Murphy in July 2022, the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) moved swiftly, only four months later, to block its enforcement.
NSSF argued that this state law was in direct contradiction to the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA), which offers broad protective measures against liabilities for the gun industry. However, the recent 3rd Circuit decision ruled that NSSF’s legal challenge might have been too hasty. This sentiment was mirrored in Judge Stephanos Bibas’ statement, noting that there was little evidence to indicate that enforcement was imminent.
As a result, he commented, the firearms industry “jumped the gun” by filing a legal challenge prior to any observable harm.
Despite this setback for the gun industry, the NSSF remains resolute. Lawrence Keane, the NSSF General Counsel, pointed out that while they disagreed with the court’s decision, it’s important to underline the court hasn’t expressly stated that New Jersey’s law is compliant with the PLCAA. This distinction leaves a door open for further legal challenges if New Jersey moves to enforce the “public nuisance” law against firearm manufacturers.
This constitutionally shaky law is part of a broader series of gun reforms rushed into law by Governor Murphy. It grants New Jersey the ability to sue the firearms sector over concocted “public nuisance” violations that government officials claim arise from various stages in the gun lifecycle – from manufacturing and distribution to marketing. The significance of this strategy is further highlighted by the establishment of a new office by the state attorney general, Matt Platkin. This office, reportedly the first of its kind in the nation, sole purpose is initiating civil enforcement actions against firearm companies at taxpayers’ expense.
Democrat supporters of the legislation believe it’s an essential tool for public safety. Attorney General Platkin reaffirmed this belief, stating that the law aims to hold accountable those whose actions, driven by profit motives, exacerbate the epidemic of gun violence.
On the national stage, New Jersey’s initiative appears to be setting a foreboding precedent. Following the state’s lead, other predominantly blue states, including Delaware, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Washington, and Illinois, have either passed or are considering analogous measures to attack the gun industry, one of America’s last robust manufacturing sectors. With the 3rd Circuit’s ruling being the first instance of a federal appellate court weighing in on such laws, the decision will likely influence subsequent judicial perspectives.
The journey is far from over. As states tread this shady legal path, they are guaranteed to encounter additional challenges from the gun industry and advocates for the U.S. Constitution. The primary contention remains the incongruence between overarching state laws like New Jersey’s and the federal PLCAA.