Categories
COOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You have to be kidding, right!?!

Rudyard Kipling King Of The Road by The Field

He was a prolific writer, the first Briton to be awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature, who nonetheless declined the appointment as Poet Laureate and turned down a knighthood. Rudyard Kipling was feted in his day for his portrayal of stiff-upper-lip Englishness – even though his traditional values and literary reputation are now occasionally vilified by fashionable revisionism. This is the familiar Kipling. However, there was another side to him. The author and poet had a passion that later went on to be shared by millions. He loved motoring.

Kipling was drawn into the fraternity of the road by newspaper magnate Alfred Harmsworth, who drove down to Rottingdean on the Sussex coast in October 1899 to demonstrate his Panhard car to his literary friend. Motoring was “like being massaged at speed”, Harmsworth declared. Kipling and his wife, Carrie, took a 20-minute trip and were equally enthralled. The outing left them ‘white with dust and dizzy with noise – but the poison worked from that hour’, Kipling declared in Something of Myself.

Kipling and his wife were enthralled by motoring

He hired a car he called The Embryo, a Lutzmann Victoria of carriage crudeness with a single-cylinder engine and belt drive, capable of 8mph. The weekly cost, including chauffeur, was 31/2 guineas. When it arrived, it was “pawing the ground before the door” and the children started dancing around it, according to their cousin, Angela, granddaughter of Edward Burne-Jones (who later became the novelist Angela Thirkell).

Kipling promised the children a ride, but “the monster” refused to start. “We sat and sat in it while the chauffeur tinkered at its insides, and then had to get out with a promise for a real ride some day,” Thirkell wrote.

The GWK light car was one of the vehicles Kipling took an interest in

The GWK light car was one of the vehicles Kipling took an interest in

Kipling and his wife used it through the summer of 1900, ostensibly for house-hunting although he admitted that they simply enjoyed the “small and fascinating villages” of England. They were driven 20 or 30 miles after breakfast, lunching in hotels and returning home in the evening on virtually empty roads.

In 1901, Kipling purchased a US built Locomobile steam car that spent much of its time off the road, mainly because the petrol burners habitually blew out in a crosswind. On one 19-mile trip the car “betrayed us foully”, he wrote to a friend. “It was a devil of a day. It ended in coming home by train.” The car was noiseless, he conceded, “but so is a corpse”. Kipling felt he had been let down. “Her lines are lovely, her form is elegant, the curves of her buggy-top are alone worth the price of admission, but as a means of propulsion she is a nickel-plated fraud.”

British cars and innovation

The underwhelming experience with the Locomobile directed him towards British cars and genuine innovation, qualities that were combined in the Lanchester produced in Birmingham by Frederick and George Lanchester. They were designed as a motor car rather than a carriage adaptation, and with a power train that owed nothing to stationary engines and transmissions. Kipling’s 1902 purchase had a centrally mounted 10hp air-cooled engine with horizontally opposed cylinders.  Plus each piston had its own crankshaft and flywheel assembly, and two contra-rotating shafts to provide mechanical smoothness, a solution that later appeared in many modern engines. Unfortunately, this car, too, was trouble. On its delivery trip from the factory to Rottingdean, driven by George Lanchester, it suffered 21 tyre deflations.

A portrait of Rudyard Kipling from 1865

A portrait of Rudyard Kipling from 1865

Flats were commonplace at that early stage of motoring. Tyres were poorly constructed and road surfaces were rugged, so a set on a light car was expected to last no more than 2,000 miles and on a large car perhaps 1,000 miles. The Lanchester’s delivery journey proved to be a foretaste. Once in Kipling’s ownership, it broke down so often that he christened it Jane Cakebread after a prostitute notorious for 93 convictions. This is possibly the first recorded instance of a pet name for a car. Kipling became an addict. In 1903, the car underwent a six-month overhaul but still broke down so often that Lanchester provided a full-time engineer at 30 shillings a week, as well as a driver. Only after June 1904, when the firm supplied a new 12hp car that Kipling named Amelia, did the author experience comparatively trouble-free motoring.

The fuel for Kipling’s passion

Amelia fuelled Rudyard Kipling’s devotion to motoring so much that he said a car was a means of indulging one’s sense of English history. “A time machine on which one can slide from one century to another,” he said. Plus, he added, cars were good for the nation’s temperance and education, since drivers needed to remain sober and to read road signs. After trying a Siddeley in 1905, Kipling bought a Daimler he called Gunhilda. But in 1910 he was won over to what became known as ‘the best car in the world’. Travelling through France with his wife, Kipling encountered two friends in Avignon. These were the motoring peer Lord Montagu, who was trying out a new 60hp Rolls-Royce, and Claude Johnson, managing director at Rolls-Royce and the man known as the hyphen in the brand’s name.

Kipling accepted the offer of a spin and the party drove into the Alps, soaring up winding passes beyond the snowline as mountain panoramas unfolded with a grandeur beyond the expectations of even the much-travelled author. He followed up this experience with a lift to Paris and promptly ordered a Rolls-Royce Silver Ghost with limousine landaulet body by coachbuilder Barker. It was delivered in March 1911 – all for £1,500. He wrote to Johnson: ‘This place, which was reasonably quiet, simply stinks and fizzes with every make of car except R-R. It’s a Christian duty to raise the tone of the community. So when you’re ready, send it along.’ However, a fire at Barker’s and royal requests for coaches for the forthcoming coronation delayed the order.

Rolls-Royce raised the tone

Rolls- Royce lent him a car, then sent a Hooper-bodied limousine. Kipling rejected it and decided to pull strings through Max Aitken, later Lord Beaverbrook. He was also his friend, investment adviser and a Rolls-Royce shareholder. Aitken wrote to Johnson: ‘I warn you that Kipling is being lost to you entirely through downright neglect and ill usage.’ Johnson’s response was that, because of Kipling’s ‘complaints and wailings’, he would be glad to be rid of him, but the matter was settled amicably and the author took delivery of The Green Goblin. He ran it for two years, then part-exchanged it for another Silver Ghost 40/50hp he called The Duchess, which took the family to France in March 1914. Kipling kept it for seven years and sold it for £200 more than it had cost him, remarking dryly that Rolls-Royces were the only cars he could afford to run.

With their lives overshadowed by the fate of their 18-year-old son, John, unaccounted for after a Loos action in 1915, the Kiplings motored many miles after the war. They hoped to find someone who knew what had happened to him. They travelled many more to cemeteries as part of Kipling’s work as an Imperial War Graves commissioner. However, fast motoring could still enliven their day. Leaving the Villers- Cotterets cemetery where an Irish Guards memorial was mooted, The Duchess ‘broke all modest records… the first 16 miles in 25 minutes,’ he wrote. Then, at 46mph, they were overtaken by ‘a light blue two-seater with lots of luggage behind’.

Kipling in hot pursuit

Kipling ordered his chauffeur to set off in pursuit. The Rolls wound up to 50mph, ‘but even then we could not see him’. However, on a Scottish bend taken too fast, The Duchess came into her own: the car, he wrote, ‘hung on with her teeth and toenails, shattering gravel like shot under her mudguards and literally swearing like a cat on a wall’. Kipling owned three Silver Ghosts through the 1920s. He sold one back to the company, which shipped it to India where it was converted into a mobile temple. In 1928, he bought a Phantom 40/50 with his favourite black-and-green coachwork, dubbed Esmeralda. With blue Windover body, this car passed to the National Trust and is housed at the Kipling family home, Bateman’s, in Rottingdean.

But his enthusiasm was beginning to wane. In 1930, Rudyard Kipling lamented that careless drivers and accidents were taking the fun out of motoring. Nevertheless, in 1932 he bought a Phantom 1 20/25 with body by Abbott of Farnham, specifying that he could wear his top hat in the back. Although trips to the south of France and Marienbad were taken by train, the chauffeur drove the car from England to meet them. The Phantom 1 was Kipling’s last car. He died in 1936, and Carrie three years later. The next reference to it seems to have been a 1963 advertisement in The Times, offering it for sale with the stipulation that ‘only Empire loyalists or persons of similar persuasion need apply’.

The famous author was ‘no driver’

Keen on swift regal motoring though he was, Kipling was no driver. Chauffeurs sustained his passion and, for all his writings, a handful of simple lines published in the Daily Mail in 1904 seem to offer his motoring epitaph. It was entitled The Dying Chauffeur: Wheel me gently to the garage, since my car and I must part. No more for me the record and the run. That cursed left-hand cylinder the doctors call my heart Is pinking past redemption – I am done. They’ll never strike a mixture that’ll help me pull my load. My gears are stripped – I cannot set my brakes. I am entered for the finals down the timeless untimed road To the Maker of the makers of all makes.

Acknowledgements: Toni and Valmai Holt, The Kipling Society, Motor Sport
Want to read more motoring content from The Field? Click here. Read about the classical cars being given an environmental makeover here. And click here to read our guide to the best UTVs for rural estates.

 

Categories
All About Guns Allies

AYA De Luxe No 2 side-by-side by Michael Yardley

Having a hand in the specification of a pair of deluxe side-by-sides makes the job of testing even more of a pleasure, and Michael Yardley is excited to see exactly what the guns can do

Product Overview

Product:

AYA De Luxe No 2 side-by-side

Manufacturer:

Having a pair of side-by-sides to test is a luxury and Michael Yardley, after having a hand in the specification of the guns, takes even more pleasure when he takes them out to put them through their paces.

AYA DE LUXE NO 2 SIDE-BY- SIDE

This month’s test concerns a new pair of AyA No 2 12-bore de Luxe sidelock side-by-sides specifically built for grouse shooting, proofed and choked for steel shot. Weighing in at just over 7lb, an ideal weight for a modern 30in game gun – or, indeed, a vintage one – they were ordered from AyA by ASI of Snape, the British importer that also brings in Rizzini from Italy. I must declare an interest before continuing: I helped specify these guns for a friend, but this afforded me the opportunity not only to consider them in much detail, but to handle and shoot them more than I normally would when testing.

First impressions are of an attractive, classically styled and well-stocked pair of guns. The scroll engraving (which is laser cut but hand finished) looks good. While you can tell the difference under scrutiny, I wouldn’t bother, however, paying more for handwork on guns intended for the field (although nothing beats hand-cut Holland or Purdey scroll). Laser engraving techniques have much advanced and suit medium scroll, as seen here, especially well. The stocks of the test guns are well proportioned, longer than the average at 15 3/4in and slightly deeper in the butt sole (at 5 3/8in) too as requested. They are nicely figured Turkish walnut and well finished in oil with hand-cut chequering. I liked the proportions of the grips and the combs. The grip is slim without being too slim. It was also specified that the combs be made a little fuller than the AyA norm.

The guns dry-mount well and feel secure at the shoulder and well anchored. They also have a bit more cast than is typical. This opens an interesting issue. The man for whom they were made – a right-hander shooting off the right shoulder – has a left eye that cuts in a bit more than it should sometimes (as many of us have). The remedy for this would normally be extra cast, but he also wanted guns that handled without feeling too odd or crooked on the moor. He had shot near-standard measurements for a long time.

So, after considerable thought and a little experiment, a compromise was reached. On clay birds, I had noted he didn’t seem too badly affected by eye dominance issues when he focused hard (indeed, he shot well). On the pattern plates, however, the potential problem became more evident. My final advice was to go with extra cast, but not as much as some old-school gunfitters (who loved specifying bent stocks) might have liked.

Breaking with our precedent to leave shooting impressions until the end, I will also note here en courant that it was really gratifying that when he did shoot with these guns for the first time, he was connecting with 90% or more of what was presented. I don’t think he would have done better with more cast – probably worse – and the guns were mounting beautifully. Generally, I always avoid extremes of cast in over-and-unders, but these guns have made me reconsider cast on side-by-sides too. Watching someone shoot should be the final arbiter, not just the pattern plate.

Back to the main plot. A feature of these guns, and another aspect of them where much thought went in, was the barrel specification. They are chopper lump and fleur-de-lys steel shot proofed at tight 1/4 (15 thou or 3/8) in both barrels for lead or steel. Steel shot does not suit tight constriction, but this choking is most efficient with lead too. Having the same choke also avoids the ‘ballistic thrombosis’ of worrying about constriction (in the old days, meantime, grouse guns were sometimes choked a little tighter in the right barrel preparing for what was expected to be a rangier first shot).

What else to say? Well, these are No 2 guns, albeit deluxe ones. AyA does still make its mechanically similar No 1, which is considerably more expensive, benefiting from better wood and engraving, and a finer finish. But, for me, the No 2 de Luxe meets a very acceptable standard for practical use.

 

TECHNICAL

AyA has long used the pattern of the Holland Royal as the inspiration for its sidelocks. Continental manufacturers making side-by-sides tend to copy the Holland rather than the Purdey design because it is more straightforward to make and, critically, simpler to regulate with its Southgate over-centre cam ejector work. AyA has had huge success with its sidelocks. With actions made from forgings, they have proven themselves extremely reliable. The test guns have the usual AyA features, including disc-set strikers, replaceable hinge pins and chopper-lump barrels – in this case proofed for steel shot and choked at 15 thou constriction right and left. Steel shot does not need any more constriction to pattern well. It is a mistake to over-choke it. I also tend to use a pellet one size bigger now rather than two. These guns have a longer forcing cone better suited to steel shot, but will happily digest conventional lead loads as well.

 

SHOOTING IMPRESSIONS

Being involved with the specification, I was excited to actually try the AyAs. Aesthetically, it would be hard to better them at the price. Dry handling was good. Balance was on the hinge pins even with the 30in barrels, and the weight was ideal. The first bird was centred, and, happily, so were the next half-dozen, swapping the guns every few shots. On tougher stuff, the AyAs continued to perform well. The 3/8 chokes in both barrels (near ideal for steel) produced good kills with lead too. Even on the 120ft tower, the guns continued to do the business. The combs, a little fuller than the AyA norm, were fine. The extra cast suited. Ejection was excellent. For the price – which is not insignificant – these offer a lot. They are a 10th of the cost of the English equivalent, but would still stand happily in more exalted company.

 

AYA DE LUXE NO 2 SIDE-BY- SIDE

♦ RRP: £12,900

♦ ASI Ltd, Alliance House, Snape, Saxmundham, Suffolk, IP17 1SW

♦ 01728 688555

♦ a-s-i.co.uk

Categories
Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom Interesting stuff

The westernmost point of the Chinese Empire is closer to Germany than it is to the easternmost point of China

Categories
All About Guns

S&W Model 610 10mm

Categories
Soldiering The Green Machine War

The Untold Horrors Of The Korean War | Korea: The Forgotten War in Colour | War Stories

Categories
All About Guns

Perfecting the Colt Python by ROB GARRETT

The new Colt 3” Python may be the best revolver on the market today!

RETURN OF THE SNAKE

In 2022, Colt fans were ecstatic when Colt brought back the King of the Colt revolvers. The return of the Python marked a new day for Colt and fans hoped it would be everything the old Python was.

The original Pythons were true works of art. Craftsmen took oversized parts and, using stones and files, carefully fitted them to the frame. The original Python was probably the most labor-intensive revolver of its time. Unfortunately, Colt discontinued Python in 2005. Ever since fans have begged Colt to resurrect the “Snake.”

In appearance, the new Python is a faithful rendition of the original. The new model retains the same graceful lines and vent rib that endeared the Python to its fans. However, this is not a remake of the original 1955 gun. In reality, Colt does not have enough skilled gunsmiths to manufacture Pythons in the old method. And, if they did, the cost of a Python would be astronomical.

The new Python retained the appearance of its predecessor while incorporating improvements in strength and production

Instead, Colt updated the Python with some very significant improvements. First, Colt has made extensive use of modern manufacturing technology to make individual parts to a higher tolerance. This eliminates most of the hand fitting that was so costly. Second, there are also subtle changes in design, specifically the frame, that make the new gun stronger than the original. This ensures that the new Python will withstand a steady diet of full house .357 Magnum loads. One great feature is that the user can change the front sight using an Allen wrench. Finally, Colt redesigned the rear sight to be more durable.

THREE INCHES IS PERFECT

When Colt introduced a 3” version, I immediately ordered one. I consider a medium frame, 3” barrel, revolver to be the perfect fighting gun! So, I was very excited when the new Python arrived at my dealer.

Taking the 3” from the blue Colt box, I found an absolutely gorgeous pistol. The brightly polished stainless finish is flawless. The pistol is void of sharp and offending edges and there are absolutely no visible machine marks. The double action on the new gun is like glass and the single action breaks nicely at just over five pounds with no grit or excessive creep. For me, the 3” barrel is the perfect length for a carry gun and the balance of the Python is perfect.

The author found the factory ramped front sight difficult to acquire and track during recoil.
In addition, the author found that the rear sight was very shallow and the notch was too narrow for the width of the front sight.

After an initial range visit, I found that the Python was lacking in two areas; the sights and the stocks. While not an issue for some shooters, I found the sights were difficult to acquire and index. The rear sight blade was very shallow and did not allow for a significant amount of light to either side of the front sight blade. I also had difficulty seeing the red ramp front sight blade.

The second issue with the Python was the stocks. I have two issues with the factory stocks. First, the stocks are not properly shaped for optimal recoil control. The taper of the stocks results in the hand riding up on the backstrap during recoil. In addition, the rear backstrap is not contoured. However, the most disappointing issue is the stocks do not fit the top of the back strap. The edge actually extends past the frame creating a sharp edge.

HARRISON SNAKE SIGHTS

John Harrison, of Harrison Design, is a good friend who happens to own a new model 4” Python. John is my age and we share the same issues with aging eyes. He found he was having the same issues with his Python as I was. While John is known for his custom work and extensive line of 1911 components, he is also a true wheelgun aficionado.

The factory front sight blade is shown in comparison to the new Harrison blade.
The Harrison rear sight blade, shown on the right, is a significant improvement over the factory blade. (left)

John set out to design a better set of sights for the Python. He has redesigned both the rear sight and the front sight for an optimized sight picture. The overall improvement is dramatic.

The height of the rear sight blade has been increased by .040, giving it a deeper notch. The width of the notch has been increased the width by .150” to allow for more daylight on each side of the front sight blade. The rear blade is also thicker than the factory blade increasing the strength against impact. Finally, he increased the size of the dovetail to reduce the play found in the factory blade.

The Harrison rear sight blade not only offers an improved sight picture but is more robust than the factory blade.
The increased height and thickness of the Harrison rear sight blade is shown in this photo.

The front sight blade is also higher to be compatible with the rear sight. The blade is .125” in width and available with a plain black serrated face, a fiber optic rod, or a 14K gold bead. Installation of the new sights can be done in just a few minutes using the supplied Allen wrench and a flathead screwdriver. I ordered a front sight with a flat-face gold bead.

The Harrison rear sight is a major improvement, especially for those with an aging eye. The gold bead had a flat face instead of the more traditional domed bead.

HOGUE MONOGRIPS

For the first 12 years of my law enforcement career, Hogue’s Monogrips were on my police service revolvers. The Hogues fit my hand well and the shape, when combined with the finger grooves, is very effective in controlling recoil and the pistol shifting in the hand. For the Python, I ordered a set of their over-mold rubber stocks.

The factory stocks, while attractive, are not the optimal shape for recoil control.
Installation of the Hogue Monogrip requires the fitting of a “U” shaped bracket to the bottom of the frame.

THE PROOF IS IN THE SHOOTING

The really nice thing is the design of the Python enables the owner to replace the sights in a matter of minutes. Range time reflected just how much difference these two improvements made to my Python. The square front post, combined with the gold bead and larger rear sight aperture, improved alignment and tracking significantly. The Hogue stocks absorbed the recoil and eliminated any shift in my grip. The Python was pleasant to shoot, even with the hottest magnum loads.

With the Harrison Snake sights, and the Hogue stocks, the 3” Python is now perfected!

I shot a modified “Test” from 10 yards, shooting two strings of five rounds each, with a par time for each string of five seconds. I used Speer’s 158-grain, Gold Dot Personal Protection load, which averaged 1,142 fps out of my chronograph. I dropped four points into the 9-ring while making the par time on both strings.

A CLASSIC PISTOL DESERVES CLASSIC LEATHER

For my revolvers, I’m addicted to custom leather. For the 3” Snake, I contacted Mike “Doc” Barranti and ordered a Chairman holster and speed strip pouch. The Chairman is a high-ride, neutral cant, holster that can be worn both strong side and cross-draw. While my holster was plain finished, for those who like to dress up their leather, Doc does amazing borders and carvings. The pouch for the speed strip is open-top and designed for low-profile carry while keeping the strip easily accessible. The combination was perfect for the “Snake”. Barranti Leather Company

Doc Barranti makes some of the best leather holsters on the market today. The Chairman was the perfect selection for the 3” Python.
Barranti’s quality and attention to detail is evident when one sees how uniform and precise the stitching is on the Barranti Chairman.

PYTHON LEGACY

The new Python, Cobra, King Cobra, and Anaconda are some of the best revolvers to ever come out of Hartford. I have had an opportunity to shoot several new Pythons, along with a King Cobra and an Anaconda. The consistent quality and finish have impressed me. Having come up in the revolver era, I am encouraged to see a revival of the market. If you own an older Python, consider getting a new one to carry and shoot. If you have never owned a Python, here is your chance to own a classic!

Colt Python Specifications

Model SP3WTC
Caliber .357 Magnum
Capacity 6 Round
Length 8.25”
Front Sight OEM Red Ramp
Rear Sight OEM Fully Adjustable
Action Single/Double
Grip Walnut w/Colt medallion
Material Stainless
Barrel Length 3”
Weight 35.5 oz.
MSRP $1,499
Categories
All About Guns Fieldcraft War Well I thought it was funny! You have to be kidding, right!?!

Marines called customer service for help in a firefight

Categories
All About Guns

A Dakota Arms single shot in Caliber 7×57 (7mm Mauser)

Categories
Manly Stuff Real men Soldiering

What real combat troops look like in the field

Why does the term a “like a bunch of pirates” come to my mind? Grumpy

Categories
Well I thought it was funny! Well I thought it was neat! You have to be kidding, right!?!

Good luck on getting that one!