Categories
All About Guns Allies This great Nation & Its People War

The Guns of U.S. Army Aviation in Vietnam — Personal Defense Weapons on Slicks, Snakes & Loaches by Will Dabbs MD

The U.S. Army has never been a particularly agile beast when it came to bold new technologies. Horse cavalrymen were dragged kicking and screaming into tanks during World War II, and the grunts and tankers of the ’50s viewed the helicopter with a tolerant skepticism at best. In 1963 the 11th Air Assault Division was testing the practical aspects of air mobility at Fort Benning, Georgia. Two years later the 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) went to war.

This WW2-era Smith and Wesson Victory .38 revolver is typical of the sorts of double action .38 revolvers issued to Army aircrews in Vietnam. Simple and stupid-proof, this basic wheelgun is easily operated one-handed.

The war in Vietnam saw the introduction of a wide array of new technologies. From smart bombs to night vision and lightweight assault rifles, Vietnam was a proving ground for countless new weapons and the tactics that drove their employment. As a result, flight crews operating Army rotary-wing combat aircraft frequently made up the rules as they went along.

There really was no precedent for what those guys were doing. UH1 Hueys and CH47 Chinooks carried troops, ammunition, equipment, and supplies into places that would have otherwise been inaccessible. The use of massed helicopter assets allowed Army commanders unparalleled mobility around and above a non-linear battlefield. Light and agile aeroscout aircraft like the OH6 provided responsive intelligence gathering. Armed versions of the UH1 and later dedicated AH1 Cobra gunships offered responsive and overwhelming aerial fire support. Throughout it, all Army flight crews operated in the treetops engaging the enemy face to face in a pitiless close range fight to the death.

The OH6A Loach (a colloquialism for Light Observation Helicopter) flew down in the treetops gathering intelligence and rooting out the enemy.

The Whirlybird Becomes a Warplane

The M3A1 Grease Gun was in common use by the Army of the Republic of South Vietnam. The gun was therefore available for barter among US forces in Vietnam.

For better or for worse the M60 was our standard belt-fed light machine gun at the time. This basic gun saw action in the D-model configuration with spade grips on a pintle mount in the doors of Hueys and Chinooks. As a flexible weapon crew chiefs frequently simply suspended their standard ground guns on bungee cords for maximum maneuverability. Solenoid-fired versions in pivoting mechanical mounts armed the first Huey gunships.

The M134 minigun saw its baptism by fire in Vietnam as well. While a few of these electric-powered Gatling guns were mounted as door guns, most saw action in the chin turrets of AH1G Cobra gunships. In this configuration, the M134 alongside the M129 automatic grenade launcher reaped a bloody harvest from the Viet Cong and NVA.

The 1911A1 pistol carried generations of GIs through several major wars. Its single-action trigger meant that the 1911A1 was not typically an issue aircrew weapon, but many were utilized for this purpose nonetheless.

One aspect of the helicopter’s low and slow operational environment was that these early aircraft were mightily vulnerable to ground fire. Heavy machineguns like the DSHk were murder on low-flying helicopters while shoulder-fired small arms were also quite effective at the sorts of ranges these engagements demanded. As a result, the Vietnam War saw an unprecedented number of survivable aircraft crashes. When faced with the prospect of personal defense while awaiting air support and extraction many of these early Army aviators acquired some unusual small arms.

The UH1 was the archetypal utility helicopter used in Vietnam. Employed as troop transports, Medevac aircraft, and gunships, the Huey transformed the battlefield in Southeast Asia.

GI-Issue Personal Defense Weapons

There is an adage in Army Aviation that you will leave a burning helicopter equipped solely with what is affixed to your body. Throughout most of the Vietnam War the standard issue handgun for Army aircrews was the double action .38 revolver. In the event of a crash pilots and aircrewmen needed to be able to operate their handguns one-handed if they were injured. As Condition 1 carry was not authorized for troops armed with the 1911, the double action .38 offered easy one-handed operation and foolproof reliability. Countless Army aviators nonetheless acquired 1911 pistols through means both official and otherwise.

Helicopter cockpits were cramped so small lightweight rifles that were easy to stash behind seat armor became a great boon. The M16 found its way into Aviation units as it was issued to other branches. Despite the relatively small size of those early M16’s, they still did not ride well in the front end of a helicopter. The solution was something somewhat stubbier.

In 1967 Colt developed a shortened version of the M16 called the XM177. There had been several lesser efforts previously, but the XM177 was the first Carbine version of the M16 to see large-scale production. Early versions sported a 10-inch barrel tipped with a sound moderator. Later versions extended the barrel to 11.5 inches for greater reliability as well as diminished muzzle flash and noise. These guns were universally referred to in theater as CAR-15’s.While technically this little chopped-down M16 was designated the XM177E2; the troops who used it called it the CAR15. Sporting either a 10 or 11.5-inch barrel and a sound moderator, the CAR15 was the submachine gun version of the M16 and a popular aircrew weapon.

The CAR-15 weighed 5.35 pounds and was 29.8 inches long with its stock collapsed. These little rifles could subsequently fit inside the cramped cockpits of Cobra Attack and Loach Observation helicopters. While problems with range, poor accuracy, excessive fouling, and erratic performance with tracer rounds plagued the guns, they saw widespread service with Army aviators.

The M134 Minigun had its baptism by fire in Vietnam. While these electrically powered Gatling guns were occasionally used as helicopter door guns, they were most commonly encountered in the chin turrets of AH-1G Cobra gunships.

Necessity is the Mother of Invention

A protracted war such as the one in Vietnam saw the proliferation of small arms from a variety of nations and eras. Friends who served in theater have related stories of obtaining everything from World War II-era submachine guns to civilian shotguns to captured Combloc weapons by barter, purchase, or theft. As a result, in these heady days before so much standardization, Army aircrews frequently flew with an amazing amalgam of defensive small arms.

The M1A1 Thompson and M3A1 Grease Gun were readily available as they were in widespread issue with South Vietnamese forces. These guns both launched heavy .45ACP rounds and had the added benefit of sex appeal to young soldiers who grew up on gangster movies. However, the Thompson, in particular, was brutally heavy. Many sky soldiers who acquired Thompsons soon grew weary of them after packing them for a time.The M60 belt-fed machinegun was the standard light machine gun for US forces in Vietnam. As aircrew weapons, they were suspended on bungee cords, fitted with spade grips and mounted on a pedestal, or fired from mechanical mounts via solenoid.

Captured Iron

Fixed stock Kalashnikovs are compact and powerful making them suitable defensive tools in close quarters. This is a new stamped receiver PSAK47 from Palmetto State Armory.

The argument has frequently been made that the enemy’s AK47 was a better Infantry weapon than our M16. The Russian AK47 and its Chinese counterpart the Chicom Type 56 were robust, reliable, hard-hitting rifles. When they could be obtained AK47’s, particularly the compact folding-stocked versions, were popular aircrew guns. AKs fed from reliable 30-round magazines and carried the extra benefit of producing a common muzzle report with the enemy’s weapons. When down and evading in hostile territory it is not good to sound strange, distinctive, or foreign.

The Combloc RPD was also a superlative weapon for its time. Firing the same M43 7.62x39mm round the AK ran from non-disintegrating 100-round belts, the RPD was remarkably lightweight and effective. Though it suffered from the lack of a quick-change barrel and a tedious reloading protocol, the RPD offered a great deal of firepower for its 16-pound weight. By contrast, our M60 weighed 23 pounds. The RPD carried its onboard ammunition in a pair of connected 50-round belts connected and wound into a pressed steel drum.The belt-fed RPD was prized for its large volume of onboard firepower. While the RPD would not fit in the most spacious helicopter cockpit, they were used on occasion by crew chiefs as survival weapons.

Practical Tactical

The CH47 Chinook provided heavy lift support to troops on the ground and could carry outsized cargo as a sling load.

The Smith and Wesson Victory Model .38-caliber revolver is indeed stupid-proof. Reliable and soft shooting, the .38 Special caliber has proven itself in countless police shootings over the decades. However, reloading is tedious and carrying spare ammunition loose in a survival vest is a suboptimal solution.

The 1911A1 hits like a freight train downrange, and its single action trigger is the standard by which all others are judged. A friend who carried a 1911 for two years as an Infantryman in World War II told me he carried his pistol with a round in the chamber, the hammer at half cock, and the safety on. With practice he could get his weapon into action both quickly and one-handed. The GI-issue 1911’s that I used operationally back in the day were all fairly long in the tooth. The loose tolerances that kept these guns in action in the face of dirt and grime typically came at the cost of accuracy.

The many-splendored ills of the M16 have been thoroughly explored in other venues, and most of the same problems apply equally or worse to the CAR15. However, aircrews typically had the luxury of keeping their weapons clean and in good repair. In my prime, I could consistently hit a man-sized target out to 400 meters with an M16A1. Having run a lot of rounds through the CAR15 over the years I would not trust it much past a football field.

Folding stock AKs were relatively unusual but popular among aircrews when they could be scrounged. This is a stamped receiver Chicom Type 56-1. Almost all AKs encountered in Vietnam had forged receivers.

The 5.56mm round relies upon velocity for effectiveness. As the CAR15 barrel in its earliest iterations was exactly half as long as that of the M16 the CAR15 offers questionable wound ballistics at long ranges anyway. Spare 20-round magazines typically rode in bandoleers draped over the seat armor.

The AH1G Cobra gunship was fast, sleek, and lethal. Cobras operated in concert with OH6 Loaches to form what was called a Pink Team. This combination of gunship and observation helicopter found, fixed, and destroyed enemy troops and equipment.

The M60 is a monster of a gun that is pure torture on a long forced march. When kept clean and run from fixed mounts the M60 was relatively reliable in my experience, but I never had one run really well in the dirt. Personally, I would leave the Pig, the affectionate term all soldiers used for this beast of a gun, in the aircraft. I’d grab something lighter with which to escape and evade.

The AK, particularly in its folding stock guise, is a superb aircrew weapon. The steel struts on the underfolding stock are uncomfortable, but they remain fully serviceable. You can wrap the stock struts in 550 cord to improve your cheek weld. The AK jumps around a bit on full auto, but its heavy 123-grain bullet carries energy well out to 300 meters or so. The sliding tangent sights are yesterday’s news but remain thoroughly effective.

The RPD would never ride in the cockpit of a Cobra or Loach but would easily tuck behind the sling seat in the crew compartment of a Huey or Chinook. The RPD offers massive short-term suppressive firepower during an extraction, though reloading is a pain. Additionally, any full auto belt fed gun runs through ammunition at a frightful rate.

Ruminations

When I flew for Uncle Sam we packed M9 Beretta pistols that offered both high capacity semiautomatic firepower along with one-handed double-action operation. A colleague indeed scrounged an M3A1 Grease Gun and flew with it during the First Gulf War. However, for the most part, Aviators of my era were expected to make do with a handgun. Much of my career was spent flying CH47D Chinooks so we had plenty of space. Nowadays the widespread issue of the M4 Carbine allows most Aviators to pack the same weapon used by his or her ground-pounding brethren.Dedicated Huey gunships mounted a variety of machineguns, automatic grenade launchers, and unguided rockets for their aerial fire support role.

On the modern battlefield, a soldier’s personal weapon is but the smallest part of the overall tactical equation. However, for a downed aviator that handgun or rifle become his entire world. A friend who was shot down in Mogadishu actually had to rely on his handgun for real. While it was not a decisive tool, it did buy him some time. When he got home he made a point to impart to those with whom he served the importance of range time with your assigned defensive weapon.

As of 2013 a CH47F helicopter cost $38.55 million. The investment required in training up the pilots and flight crewmembers to operate these complex aircraft is comparably substantial. However, when evading in hostile territory everything comes down to a basic rifle or handgun. Starting back in the 1960’s Army Aviators have carried a wide variety of personal defense weapons. In today’s non-linear battlefields these lessons learned still carry exceptional gravitas.

Categories
Soldiering This great Nation & Its People War

What Walking Point Really Meant in Vietnam

Categories
War

When Uncle Sam gets really tired of somebodies sh*t

Categories
This great Nation & Its People War

The Most Famous Marines in U.S. History | USMC Legends Battlefield Of Knowledge Battlefield Of Knowledge

Categories
All About Guns This great Nation & Its People War

USS Saratoga: WWII Carrier Sunk by an Atom Bomb By Peter Suciu

The USS Saratoga (CV-3) was one of just three United States Navy aircraft carriers — along with USS Ranger (CV-4) and USS Enterprise (CV-6) — to survive the entirety of the Second World War.

Although outdated by 1943, as the newer and more capable Essex-class entered service, CV-3 was one of the American flattops that fought for time in the early stages of the conflict, and continued to find a role until victory was finally achieved.

USS Saratoga CV-3 in 1928
This 1928 photograph shows the starboard side of the USS Saratoga. Note the presence of the four twin 8-inch (203mm) guns. Image: U.S. Navy

After the war ended, USS Saratoga was among the warships that helped return United States military personnel from distant posts in the Pacific, and met her end as a target for nuclear weapon tests during Operation Crossroads.

An Important Name

USS Saratoga is fittingly remembered for her role during the Second World War, yet she has historic ties to the founding of the nation. In addition, she was ordered as the United States sought to avoid entry into the First World War, and was originally authorized as a Lexington-class battlecruiser.

USS Saratoga CV-3 underway at sea in 1928
The USS Saratoga was photographed here in 1928 while she was underway at sea. Image: NARA

The famed American flattop was also the fifth of six U.S. Navy warships named for the Revolutionary War’s Battle of Saratoga, which actually consisted of two battles fought in September and October 1777. The second was a decisive American victory, which persuaded France to enter the conflict as an American ally.

USS Saratoga recovers Martin T4M bombers during flight operations in the 1930s
The USS Saratoga recovers Martin T4M torpedo bombers during flight operations in the 1930’s. Image: NARA

The World War II carrier was preceded by an 18-gun sloop-of-war lost in a gale during the Revolution and was itself followed by a 26-gun corvette that saw service during the War of 1812 on Lake Champlain. The third USS Saratoga was a 22-gun sloop-of-war that served with the U.S. Navy for more than 40 years. The fourth USS Saratoga (ACR-2) was the former armored cruiser USS New York, which also ended her service with the name USS Rochester.

The most recent and final to date USS Saratoga (CV-60) was a Forrestal­-class supercarrier that saw service during the Cold War.

From Battlecruiser to Carrier

As noted, the Lexington-class was originally to have consisted of six battlecruisers. Construction of what was to become CV-3 was put on hold during the First World War because there was a greater need for anti-submarine vessels to counter Germany’s U-boat campaign, which led to America’s entry into the conflict. That was almost certainly for the best, as it allowed the design to be improved, including increased armor protection based on experience gained by the UK’s Royal Navy during the conflict. That likely contributed to her survival during the Second World War.

construction progress of USS Saratoga CV-3
This series of photographs shows the construction progress of the USS Saratoga. Image: NARA

When she was finally laid down at the New York Shipbuilding Corporation at Camden, New Jersey, in 1920, the warship received the hull number CC-3. USS Saratoga was on track to be the second of the six Lexington-class battlecruisers.

However, the Washington Naval Conference resulted in the construction of USS Saratoga being suspended when she was around 28 percent completed. Work was also halted on USS Lexington, and rather than scrap the vessel, it was converted into a carrier. CC-3 was subsequently given the hull number CV-3 on July 1, 1922.

forward gun turrets of USS Saratoga 1933
View of forward gun turrets on the USS Saratoga while in Hawaiian waters, circa 1933. Image: U.S. Navy

Following the conversion, the USS Lexington (CV-2) and CV-3 were the largest aircraft carriers in the world, with flight decks 901 feet long and 100 feet wide. Each was fitted with lowerable crash barriers, a simple yet innovative feature that enabled the two American flattops to quadruple the landing rate of aircraft. That allowed USS Lexington and USS Saratoga to operate with 86 planes, double the number of the Royal Navy’s HMS Courageous.

USS Saratoga transits the Panama Canal in 1930
Under the command of Capt. Fredrick J. Horne, the USS Saratoga transits the Panama Canal in March of 1930. Image: U.S. Navy

Powered by diesel-fueled turbines with electric motors, the U.S. carriers could reach speeds of 34 knots. As naval aviation was still considered experimental in nature, the warships, which displaced 36,000 tons, were armed with four twin 8-inch (203mm) guns.

Readying for War

CV-3 was commissioned on November 16, 1927, nearly a month ahead of USS Lexington, giving USS Saratoga the distinction of being the first “fast carrier” to enter service. She sailed from Philadelphia in early January 1928 for a shakedown cruise, and it was on January 11 that Marc Andrew “Pete” Mitscher, the ship’s air officer, made the first landing on the flight deck. Mitscher, a pioneer in naval aviation, would go on to become an admiral in the United States Navy, leading a Fast Carrier Task Force in the Pacific War.

Boeing F2B biplane fighters on the flight deck of the USS Saratoga in 1928
Boeing F2B biplane fighters on the flight deck of the USS Saratoga in 1928. Aircraft carriers were still in their infancy and took a backseat to the power the battleships seen in the background. Image: U.S. Navy

On January 27, 1928, USS Saratoga carried out a unique experiment with the rigid airship USS Los Angeles (ZR-3), which moored to the flattop’s stern to take on fuel and stores.

Two years later, CV-3 took part in Fleet Problem IX, her first fleet exercise. The drills included a simulated attack on the Panama Canal, during which USS Saratoga launched a strike that could have destroyed the locks. However, as the carrier had been spotted by defending vessels, she was also “sunk” by aircraft from USS Lexington. Those drills served as an augury to the future conflict in which both carriers would fight, and sadly, the Lexington wouldn’t survive.

Over the next decade, the United States Navy continued to develop its carrier tactics. During the subsequent Fleet Problem X in the Caribbean in 1930, CV-3 was again sunk, along with USS Langley (CV-1), in a surprise attack carried out by CV-2. USS Saratoga managed to gain the upper hand in the following Fleet Problem XI, where CV-3 came out on top.

Fleet Problem XIX in 1938 may have been the most significant of the exercises, as CV-3’s new squadron of Douglas TBD Devastators, the first torpedo bombers to serve on a flattop, was used in a “sneak attack” on Pearl Harbor, catching the base largely off-guard!

At that point, Japanese and American tactics were mainly the same: to provide an air umbrella for a strike force of battleships. That exercise clearly demonstrated a more effective use of aircraft carriers, where air power could strike far deeper and harder into enemy territory than any warship.

USS Saratoga CV-3 anchored in Hawaii
The USS Saratoga (CV-3) was an early design of aircraft carrier that still incorporated surface warfare thinking. In this photo, you can see the 8-inch/55-caliber gun turrets forward of the superstructure. Image: U.S. Navy

Japan soon began building two 30,000-ton carriers, along with aircraft ideally suited for such operations. Then, three years after the Fleet Problem XIX, the Imperial Japanese Navy (IJN) attacked Pearl Harbor for real. At that point, the IJN operated 10 carriers to the United States Navy’s eight, of which only three were in the Pacific.

USS Saratoga in December 1941

CV-3 wasn’t at sea when the IJN attack on Pearl Harbor occurred, as the carrier had only recently completed a modernization at Bremerton Navy Yard, Washington, which saw the widening of the flight deck at the bow, and additional aircraft guns installed.

USS Saratoga in Puget Sound May 1945
The USS Saratoga navigates through the Puget Sound on May 15, 1945. Image: U.S. Navy

Work was only completed in late November 1941, and on December 7, the USS Saratoga arrived in San Diego to embark her air group. Just a day later, the warship was dispatched to carry United States Marine aircraft to reinforce the garrison at Wake Island.

She arrived at Pearl Harbor on December 15, quickly refueled, and then rendezvoused with the cargo ship USS Tangier (AV-8), which carried relief troops and supplies. USS Lexington (CV-2) and USS Enterprise (CV-6) provide distant cover, but when reports came that Wake Island was under attack, the relief force was recalled. Wake Island, the “Alamo of the Pacific,” fell to Japanese forces on December 23. Military historians have debated whether the right call was made to pull back the American carriers, but the U.S. was still fighting for time at that point.

USS Saratoga carried out operations near the Hawaiian Islands as the year ended.

USS Saratoga CV-3 arrives at Pearl Harbor Hawaii June 1942
USS Saratoga arrives at Pearl Harbor in June 1942. She departed the following day to join USS Enterprise (CV-6) and USS Hornet (CV-8) near the Midway Islands. Image: U.S. Navy

Just days into 1942, south of Oahu, CV-3 was hit by a deep-running torpedo fired by the IJN submarine I-16. It could have been a disaster for the United States Navy to lose a carrier, but the added armor likely helped save the ship. Six crew members were killed and three firerooms were flooded, yet the aircraft carrier limped back to Pearl Harbor under her own power. Temporary repairs were made, and the ship then headed back to Bremerton Navy Yard for permanent repairs and upgrades to her anti-aircraft batteries.

Returned to Service

USS Saratoga was sidelined until May, undergoing repairs. After then traveling again to San Diego, CV-3 conducted intensive training with her air group before heading back into action. Although the United States Navy expected a major assault on Midway in early June 1942, the carrier first needed to load aircraft, stores, and rendezvous with escorts.

crewmen conducting air operations on USS Saratoga
A Navy sailor signals to the pilot of an F6F Hellcat during air operations on the USS Saratoga. Image: U.S. Navy

She only arrived at Pearl Harbor on June 6, missing the showdown at the Battle of Midway.

Joined by USS Enterprise and USS Hornet (CV-8), the carrier was deployed to the Aleutian Islands, where the Japanese had landed its forces. However, the operation was canceled due to the slow speed of the fleet, and just a month later, CV-3 was steaming again to the South Pacific.

USS Saratoga served as the flagship for Rear Admiral Frank J. Fletcher during the landings on Guadalcanal, and the flattop had completed training flights at the Fiji Islands just weeks earlier. For two days, aircraft from the carrier provided cover, and afterwards, CV-3 continued to operate east of the Solomons to protect the sea lanes.

TPM torpedo bomber lands on the deck of the USS Saratoga
Grumman F6F-3 Hellcat fighters on the USS Saratoga flight deck as a TBM torpedo plane approaches to land, circa 1943-44. Image: U.S. Navy

Finally, on August 24, contact was made, and USS Saratoga saw her first major combat operations, launching her aircraft at the IJN’s light carrier Ryūjō. Commander H. D. “Don” Felt led the Air Group 3 (AG-3), equipped with the Grumman TBF Avenger torpedo bomber, in the attack. A 1,000-pound armor-piercing bomb dropped by Felt’s aircraft struck the flight deck of the IJN’s light carrier, setting it afire.

Three more bombs found their target, and five torpedo-armed Avengers also targeted the Ryūjō at the starboard bow, with one torpedo striking the carrier. Ryūjō listed to the starboard, dead in the water. By that evening, she was at the bottom of the Pacific. Aviators from USS Saratoga had scored their first significant victory of the war.

Then just a week later, another Japanese torpedo, fired by the IJN submarine I-26, struck CV-3. Although no one was killed, a dozen sailors were wounded, and an engine room was flooded. She was temporarily dead in the water, but the New Orleans-class heavy cruiser USS Minneapolis (CA-36) was able to tow the carrier back to Tongatabu for temporary repairs. USS Saratoga arrived at Pearl Harbor on September 21.

Grumman TBF Avenger lands on the deck of the USS Saratoga CV-3
In this 1942 photograph, a Grumman TBF Avenger lands on the USS Saratoga. Image: U.S. Navy

Repairs were completed by early November 1942, and she was deployed back to the Eastern Solomons. She spent a year providing air cover for some minor Allied operations, and it wasn’t until a year later, in November 1943, that she took part in any significant combat, when the carrier helped neutralize the Japanese airfields on Buka.

On November 5, 1943, aircraft from USS Saratoga and the Independence-class light aircraft carrier USS Princeton (CV/CVL-23) conducted a raid on the occupied port of Rabaul to destroy the IJN fleet. The port was one of the most heavily defended Japanese bases in the Pacific, with anti-aircraft guns ringing the harbor, as well as six airfields from which fighter aircraft could launch.

The Japanese assumed the defensive shield couldn’t be penetrated, but they were wrong.

CV-3’s aircraft were able to break through the heavily defended port and damage multiple Japanese heavy cruisers, including the AtagoChikumaMayaMogami, and Takao, as well as the light cruiser Agano. The Avengers succeeded in torpedoing the light cruiser Noshiro and the destroyer Fujinami. The carrier-based assault was followed by 27 Consolidated B-24 Liberators, but the American bombers — which sought to target Japanese aircraft on the ground — found no targets of opportunity and hit the shore installations instead.

USS Saratoga circa 1942-1943
Shown here is a photo of the USS Saratoga taken some time in 1942 or 1943. Image: U.S. Navy

The strike, although costly with every carrier-based plane taking some damage, crippled operations at Rabaul and stopped a major Japanese naval offensive. Having spent a year at sea, USS Saratoga was overdue for repairs and returned to the United States.

From the Marshall Islands to Iwo Jima

In January 1944, USS Saratoga once again returned to Pearl Harbor, joined by USS Langley (CVL-27) and USS Princeton, as the warships were deployed to support the U.S. Navy’s Gilbert and Marshall Islands Campaign. Aircraft from CV-3 took part in attacks on Japanese-held Wotje and Taroa, then on the Engebi and Eniwetok atolls, and provided air cover for American ground forces during the landings.

Following the campaign, in March 1944, USS Saratoga was dispatched to the Indian Ocean, where she trained with the Royal Navy carrier HMS Illustrious, and then took part in Operation Cockpit, the raids on Japanese-occupied Java and Sumatra. The operation was notable as the Allied force included the Free French battleship Richelieu, the Dutch cruiser HNLMS Tromp, the New Zealand cruiser HMNZS Gambia, and four Australian destroyers.

sailors rescue wounded crewmen from TBF Avenger after Rabaul Raid 1943
Sailors aboard the USS Saratoga rescue wounded crewmen from a TBF Avenger after an air raid on Rabaul in 1943. Image: U.S. Navy

The air wing of the British flattop included Vought F4U Corsairs and Fairey Barracuda torpedo/dive bombers, while the air group of CV-3 consisted of Grumman F6F HellcatsDouglas SBD Dauntless dive bombers, and Grumman TBF Avenger torpedo bombers. The engagement was largely inconclusive, but it provided the Royal Navy with much-needed insight into carrier operations. Following the brief battle in the Indian Ocean, USS Saratoga was recalled to the United States for another refit. However, on the return journey, most of the Allied force also took part in Operation Transom, against the occupied city of Surabaya on Java, another raid that has been deemed inconclusive.

USS Saratoga completed her refit and spent the remainder of 1944 carrying out training for night fighter squadrons. Then, in January 1945, she was ordered to rejoin the fleet at Iwo Jima. As the carrier arrived in the area of operations, she came under a Japanese kamikaze attack.

Three bombs and two kamikaze aircraft struck the aging flattop. She was struck again as night fell. The carrier’s forward flight deck was destroyed, there were holes on her starboard side, and a large fire broke out on the hangar deck. The attack killed 123 men and also destroyed 36 planes.

Miraculously, USS Saratoga survived.

flight deck of USS Saratoga on fire after being hit by kamakazes
Fires burning on the foreword part of the USS Saratoga‘s flight deck after she was hit by several kamikazes off Iwo Jima, February 21, 1945. Image: U.S. Navy

She didn’t meet the same fate as USS Lexington, which had been lost following the Battle of Coral Sea in May 1942. By evening, the fires on USS Saratoga were under control, and she was even able to recover aircraft. She was again forced to return to Bremerton for repairs. CV-3 then spent the final months of the war as a training platform at Pearl Harbor.

When the war ended with Japan’s surrender, USS Saratoga was among the many warships assigned to “Magic Carpet” duty. She helped bring home more than 29,000 Pacific War veterans, more than any other vessel. For her actions in the Second World War, she received four campaign decorations, eight battle stars, the American Campaign Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, the American Defense Service Medal, and the World War II Victory Medal.

Impressively, USS Saratoga recorded a lifetime total of 98,549 landings during her 17 years in service.

Operations Crossroads

USS Saratoga wasn’t just one of the three United States Navy carriers in service before the war to survive until victory was achieved; she was also the oldest. It was already evident there would be no place for the flattop in the post-war world.

USS Saratoga flight deck showing army equipment arranged for atomic test
The flight deck of the USS Saratoga is shown here with a variety of U.S. Army vehicles and weapons tied down for the atomic testing of Operation Crossroads. Image: NARA

Sadly, no consideration was given to preserving the vessel as a floating museum. Instead, the decision was made to employ the carrier in the Operation Crossroads atomic bomb tests on naval vessels at Bikini Atoll. USS Saratoga proved as tough and determined against an atomic bomb as she did against the torpedoes and kamikazes.

USS Saratoga CV-3 sinks beneath the waves during atomic bomb testing
The “Big Three” on her flight deck visible until the last, the gallant old aircraft carrier Saratoga slides beneath the radioactive waters of Bikini Lagoon. Image: NARA

She survived the initial bomb, Test Able, which was an air burst over the site. However, she was fatally damaged during the subsequent Test Baker, an underwater detonation carried out on July 25, 1946. USS Saratoga sank approximately eight hours after the underwater blast. She was struck from the U.S. Navy list on August 15, 1946, marking the official end of her service.

Categories
Art War

The Bedford Incident

Categories
All About Guns The Green Machine War

M1 Abrams — Best Job I Ever Had By Mason Berryman

The M1 Abrams was conceived with a singular, unyielding purpose: the total destruction of enemy armored formations. Over the last four decades, it has become the absolute pinnacle of tank warfare made manifest.

Its sheer battlefield dominance has not only won conflicts, but forced militaries across the globe to fundamentally rewrite their combat doctrines when it comes to both employing and defending against armored units.

M1 Abrams tank at Fort Irwin
U.S. Soldiers hold a defensive position in a M1 Abrams main battle tank at the National Training Center, Fort Irwin, California. Image: Spc. Casey Auman/U.S. Army

From spearheading the rapid collapse of the Iraqi regime in the famous “Battle of 73 Easting” to maintaining overmatch and superiority in all manner of theaters worldwide, the Abrams has spent generations striking fear into the enemies of the Free World. As a tank crewman who has served on every position of the M1 Abrams in the U.S. Army, let me be the first to tell you: that fear is well-deserved.

original M1 Abrams tank prototype at Aberdeen Proving Grounds
The original M1 Abrams prototype main battle tank on display at the U.S. Army Aberdeen Proving Grounds. Image: Don S. Montgomery, U.S. Navy/NARA

While there have been many changes since the first 105mm M1 rolled off of the assembly line, its core identity remains exactly the same. Its familiar silhouette hasn’t changed much over the decades, but that familiarity should not be mistaken for stagnation. The current iteration, the M1A2 SEPv3, proves the platform’s enduring supremacy.

Make no mistake: underneath that recognizable steel carapace lies a heavily upgraded, cutting-edge war machine that remains the pinnacle of armored technology, lethality, and protection available anywhere in the world.

Genesis & Evolution

Born from the ashes of a failed U.S./West German joint venture in the 1960’s, the United States eventually realized it needed its own independent, uncompromising design to hold the Fulda Gap against any Soviet incursions into the rest of Europe. The result of this realization was the M1 Abrams. Entering service in the 1980s with a 105mm rifled gun, it was a war machine purpose built for what is referred today as Large Scale Combat Operations (LSCO).

M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams tank
An M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams assigned to the 1st Armored Division at McGregor Range Complex, New Mexico in March 2026. Image: Sgt. David Poleski/U.S. Army

As the threat evolved, so did the Abrams. The first step of that evolution was the M1A1. This model introduced the much more powerful 120mm smoothbore cannon that is still used today. This power was demonstrated to the world firsthand during Operation Desert Storm.

M1A1 Abrams tank gunner loads ammunition during training at Fort Carson Colorado
Sgt. Zachary Wilson reloads ammunition on an M1A1 Abrams tank during qualification tables on Fort Carson, Colorado, September 29, 2025. Image: Sgt. William Rogers/U.S. Army

Riding high off of the positive waves of absolute victory from Desert Storm, the M1A1 gave birth to the M1A2, which ushered in the digital age of armored warfare. Advanced fire control networks and independent thermal sights for both the tank commander and the gunner are now staples in the armored community, but they were cutting edge and game changing at the time.

M1A2 SEPv3 firing sabot round at McGregor Range Complex New Mexico
An M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams fires a sabot-type round at the McGregor Range Complex in New Mexico. Image: Sgt. David Poleski/U.S. Army

During the Global War on Terror, the Abrams was forced to change its identity. Gone were the days of facing down enemy tank battalions.

Now was the time of counterinsurgency (COIN) and urban warfare. Upgrade kits like the Tank Urban Survival Kit (TUSK) and System Enhancement Packages (SEP) facilitated that evolution and allowed the Abrams to adjust as needed to the mission at hand.

However, times and missions have changed once again: COIN is out and LSCO is back in. The M1A2 SEPv3 showcases a definitive return to the Abrams original mission and purpose: complete domination over near-peer adversaries on the battlefield.

Upgraded with enhanced power generation, an Ammo Data Link (ADL) with programmable munitions, and reinforced armor capable of defeating modern anti-tank guided missiles, the SEPv3 ensures the Abrams remains the apex predator in the conventional battle space.

Lethality and Firepower

The first thing any apex predator is judged by is the size of its teeth, and the Abrams possesses some of the sharpest teeth in the game. The combat-proven 120mm M256 smoothbore cannon strikes fear into enemy armor commanders worldwide, and for good reason. The SEPv3 pairs that cannon with an upgraded Fire Control System (FCS) with state-of-the-art, third-generation Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) day and night optics for both the gunner and tank commander.

This enables true “hunter-killer” capability, allowing the commander to scan for new targets while the gunner engages the current one. The tank can carry up to 43 main gun rounds: 18 in the ready rack behind a mechanized blast door, 18 in the semi ready rack, six in hull storage, and one battle-carried in the tube.

M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams tanks in Lithuania during NATO exercise
U.S. Army M1A2 SEPv3 Abrams staged prior to conducting a live fire exercise, Jan. 28, 2026, on General Silvestras Žukauskas Training Area, Pabradė, Lithuania. Image: Sgt. Asher Atkinson/DVIDS

Not every target is going to require a 120mm sized one-way-ticket to hell, so that’s where our secondary armament comes in. A 7.62mm M240 coaxial machine gun sits right next to the main gun, supported by an immense 11,400-round combat load.

The loader’s station features a skate-mounted M240, while the commander operates a .50-cal. machine gun mounted on a Low Profile Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station (CROWS-LP). The CROWS-LP is a massive upgrade for crew survivability, allowing the commander to accurately fire the machine gun using a joystick and screen from the safety of the turret interior.

Armor & Survivability

The SEPv3 features the latest generation of depleted uranium composite armor, offering unparalleled kinetic and chemical energy protection. However, the most significant survivability upgrade against modern threats is the integration of the Trophy Active Protective System, more commonly referred to as the “trophy system”.

M1 Abrams on maneuver at Fort Knox Kentucky 1980s
M1 Abrams main battle tanks seen here on maneuvers at Fort Knox, Kentucky during the 1980’s. Image: NARA

The trophy system utilizes radar arrays mounted to the exterior of the tank to detect incoming Anti-Tank Guided Missiles (ATGMs) and rocket-propelled grenades, automatically launching a counter-measure to intercept and destroy the projectile before it impacts the vehicle.

Communications

While the internal networking isn’t the most glamorous aspect of the tank, it is absolutely critical for modern maneuver warfare. The SEPv3 completely overhauls the tank’s digital architecture. It builds upon the situational awareness provided by Joint Battle Command-Platform (JBC-P), allowing the crew to track friendly and enemy forces in real-time on digital maps.

prepositioned M1 Abrams tank activated during Reforger 84 in West Germany 2d Armored Division
In West Germany, a prepositioned M1 Abrams main battle tank is guided out of a warehouse by a member of the 1st Tiger Brigade, 2nd Armored Division during Reforger ’84. Image: NARA

The physical integration of these systems is streamlined through Remote Switching Modules (RSMs), which efficiently distribute power and data across the platform, eliminating the need to completely gut and rewire the tank for future upgrades.

Mobility and Power Generation

The SEPv3 is propelled by the iconic Honeywell AGT1500 gas turbine engine.

Delivering 1,500 horsepower, it can push the tank to a listed top speed of 42mph on paved roads (however I can neither confirm nor deny having gotten one to over 60mph going down a massive hill at Fort Benning as a Private). Keep in mind, this vehicle weighs more than 70 tons.

M1A2 Abrams tank during exercise in Poland 2026
U.S. Army M1A2 Abrams tank advances during a platoon level situational training exercise at Bemowo Piskie Training Area, Poland, Jan. 22, 2026. Image: Sgt. Eric Allen/DVIDS

To support the massive electrical draw of these new systems, optics and networking devices without constantly running the turbine engine, the SEPv3 comes with a factory installed Auxiliary Power Unit (APU). Older model tanks had after-the-fact APUs mounted in the exterior bustle racks of the turret, but this took up valuable storage space and left it vulnerable to enemy fire. This new APU is co-located with the turbine engine in the hull of the tank, giving it valuable armored protection. The APU allows the crew to run all electronic systems in a silent watch mode while preserving main engine fuel and minimizing the tank’s thermal and acoustic signatures.

Peer Comparison

When stack ranking the SEPv3 against the rest of the world, the dividing line ultimately comes down to doctrine. Eastern designs tend to favor a smaller silhouette and lower weight, while Western designs prioritize crew survivability and sustained fighting capability.

The Adversaries

Russia’s T-90 and China’s Type 99A share a fundamental difference in combat philosophy from the Abrams. Both utilize a 125mm main gun fed by an autoloader, reducing the crew to three men. This allows for a lower profile and lighter weight (50 tons to the Abrams’ 70), but it makes these changes in exchange for the acceptance of a few fatal flaws.

M1 Abrams tank moves into position at National Training Center Fort Irwin
An M1 Abrams moves into a fighting position during Decisive Action Rotation 22-06 at the National Training Center, Fort Irwin, Calif., April 8, 2022. Image: Spc. Kyle Goines/U.S. Army

The Russian reliance on the carousel autoloader stores ammunition directly in the crew compartment. Once a penetrating hit detonates that ammunition, the crew and tank are instantly destroyed, typically with the turret being cast into the air like a toddler throwing a toy. This is referred to as the “Turret Toss Olympics” in the armor community.

US Army M1 Abrams moves through German countryside in Reforger 82
A U.S. Army M1 Abrams tanks kicks up a cloud of dust in the German countryside while participating in Reforger ’82. Image: NARA

The Abrams’ manual loader, combined with the isolated ammo compartment, mechanized pneumatic blast door and blowout panels, ensures that a similar hit usually leaves the crew alive. Furthermore, the lack of a fourth crew member in the T-90 and Type 99 degrades the crew’s ability to execute tasks like track maintenance, pull security, or manage fatigue during continuous operations.

The Allies

NATO allies’ design philosophy and doctrine tend to align closely with the United States and the Abrams, featuring heavily armored treaded dreadnoughts with four-man crews.

M1 Abrams tank in training exercise Fort Lewis Washington 1996
A M1 Abrams Tank from the 2nd Infantry Division, Fort Lewis, Washington, on maneuvers at the Joint Readiness Training Center. Image: NARA

Germany’s Leopard 2A7V is the closest thing the Abrams has to a cousin. The M1’s 120mm cannon is a derivative of the same Rheinmetall gun used in the Leopard 2. The primary divergence between the two vehicles is their means of propulsion. The Leo uses a diesel powerpack rather than a gas turbine. The diesel is more fuel-efficient, but lacks the immediate, drag-strip torque and multi-fuel flexibility of the Abrams AGT1500 turbine.

The UK’s Challenger 2 is renowned for its focus on crew protection and survivability, which is shown in its development and implementation of their highly classified Dorchester armor. The Challenger 2 uses a 120mm rifled gun, but the Challenger 3 will be switching to a 120mm smoothbore cannon, just like the Leopard and the Abrams. This aligns their lethality doctrine directly with that of the USA and Germany, standardizing ammunition logistics across allied armor formations.

The Operator’s Perspective

Allow me to be crystal clear: while being a part of the Abram’s crew is the best job I ever had, it is by no means a walk in the park. It is brutally physically and mentally demanding. You are living, eating, and sleeping out of a mechanized steel coffin, manhandling 120mm tank rounds the size of an adult human leg that weigh 50 pounds each. The sheer kinetic toll of maintaining a 73-ton war wagon and its weapons is intensive to say the least.

M1 Abrams tank maintenance
U.S. Army Spc. Colin Palacios, an M1 Abrams driver, performs maintenance on his tank during the Iron Spear Tank Competition in Adazi, Latvia, on Nov. 17, 2025. Image: Pfc. Gabriel Martinez/DVIDS

The technology inside the SEPv3 is incredible, but it doesn’t make the work effortless. In fact, it just changes the nature of the difficulty. For the Tank Commander, the main challenge is command and control. He must process a massive influx of digital data from his JBC-P and radios while directing his tank and his crew.

USMC M1A2 Abrams tank with M1 mine clearing blade system Iraqi Freedom 2003
On the side of the highway near Az Zubayr, Iraq, a U.S. Marine Corps (U.S.M.C.) M1A2 Abrams tank is equipped with an M1 Mine Clearing Blade System. Image: NARA

The Gunner has to manage the advanced Fire Control Systems, toggle optics, laser targets and conduct fire commands under extreme pressure. The Loader does more than just slam rounds into the breech. They are the ultimate multitaskers who have to balance loading the gun/coax, managing the radios, manning his M240 and assisting the TC/gunner in target acquisition.

M1 Abrams tanks in NATO Exercise Display Determination 87 Turkey
M1 Abrams main battle tanks from the 24th Infantry Division (Mechanized) participate in NATO Exercise Display Determination ’87 in Turkey. Image: NARA

The Driver has to execute tactical maneuvers in a massive treaded vehicle from a reclined position with an incredibly limited field of view. This requires constant vigilance to avoid accidents, such as throwing a track or burying the tank in soft terrain.

M1 Abrams tanks move through West German forest during REFORGER 85
U.S. Army M1 Abrams main battle tanks move along a dirt road in West Germany during Exercise Reforger ’85. Image: NARA

Furthermore, the Army’s doctrinal shift from counterinsurgency back to Large Scale Combat Operations has been a hard transition for some. Retraining the muscle memory from urban patrols and route clearance to fast-paced, peer-on-peer armored maneuver warfare is a massive undertaking.

Conclusion

But at the end of the day, when the line-of-departure is crossed, the exhaustion fades away. The SEPv3 and its weapons are the absolute best in the world, and they are crewed by the best army in the world.

M1A2 Abrams with crew at Novo Selo Training Area Bulgaria 2025
An M1A2 Abrams crew prepares for gunnery training at Novo Selo Training Area, Bulgaria on September 27, 2025. Image: Maj. Brian Sutherland/DVIDS

The Abrams stands as the ultimate refinement of a legendary machine. It is a 73-ton masterclass in firepower, protection, and maneuver warfare. That being said, no platform can defy the limits of physics forever.

Recognizing the unsustainable weight of constant bolt-on upgrades, the Army has pivoted toward the M1E3. Drawing inspiration from the recent AbramsX tech demo, this generation will shed tons in weight, embracing a hybrid-electric drive, unmanned turret, and built-in active protection to counter the drone and missile-saturated battlefields of the future.

Tomorrow will get here eventually, but until it does, we have today thoroughly taken care of. If a nation needs to shatter enemy lines and dominate the ground domain, the M1A2 SEPv3 is the undisputed best tool for the job. It is the sharpest tip of the longest spear, ensuring the nations who use it and the tankers who crew it will continue to dictate the terms of armored warfare for years to come.

Categories
Art War

“Gassed” by John Singer Sargent 1919 (Imperial war museum).

The Son & Heir and I were lucky enough to have gone to the War Museum. Where we saw this painting. It is of a huge size and very moving to see. As it really tell of the human cost of War.

By the way if you are in London, I can most highly recommend going to this place. It is just jammed packed with relics of all the wars that Britain has fought in.  Also the Docents there are a fountain of information.

Categories
All About Guns The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People War

Bizarre Things No One Told You About The Korean War

Categories
War

Russia Launches Massive Assault (It Ends in Disaster)