Categories
A Victory! Allies Dear Grumpy Advice on Teaching in Today's Classroom Hard Nosed Folks Both Good & Bad Manly Stuff Real men Soldiering Some Red Hot Gospel there! Stand & Deliver War

The Doctor Who Earned the Victoria Cross Twice by, Will Dabbs

Shot three times and still refusing to quit, Dr. Arthur Martin-Leake became one of only three men ever to earn the Victoria Cross twice. His story makes most definitions of courage seem inadequate.

Dr. Arthur Martin-Leake
This is Arthur Martin-Leake. He was utterly fearless in combat. Public domain.

There is kind of a weird dichotomy in my world. As a Bible-believing evangelical Christian who served as a combat arms officer, I came to grips with the peaceful tenets of my faith juxtaposed against the prospect of ripping the very life out of our great nation’s enemies. Then I left all of that and entered medical training, eventually formally taking the Hippocratic Oath.

The modern version of that pledge is actually fairly verbose. The last bit reads, “If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help.” That honestly seems a bit unduly touchy-feely to me, but you get the gist.

Curiously, the earliest surviving version of the oath of Hippocrates dates back to 43 AD and specifically forbids abortion. Additionally, the concept of “Primum Non Nocere” or “First Do No Harm” isn’t actually in there per se. “I will abstain from all intentional wrong-doing and harm” typically substitutes today.

Docter holding Gun
I haven’t had a great deal of difficulty reconciling my faith, my profession, and my innate drive for self-reliance.

It is respect for the Hippocratic Oath that typically keeps physicians from participating in state-sponsored executions. It’s pretty tough to “First Do No Harm” if your objective is to institutionally kill somebody. It can therefore seem a bit incongruous that a professional medicine man might pack a gun every day or bear arms in service to his country.

Personally, I never struggled with any of that. I read Christ’s mandate to turn the other cheek as a personal thing. Standing idly by while evil men harm innocent folk never seemed terribly righteous to me. That’s certainly not the way real men like Moses, David, Joshua, or Nehemiah might have done it.

As such, while I do spend my days stamping out disease, I also pack a gun whenever I’m out where the Wild Things Roam and then sleep soundly afterwards. It turns out I am not the only physician to have found such balance.

The Guy

Born in April of 1874, Arthur Martin-Leake was the fifth son of Stephen and Isabel Martin-Leake at Standon outside Ware, Hertfordshire. Arthur also had two sisters. Four of the five male Martin-Leake siblings earned commissions in the British Army. The fifth was a Naval officer who captained the first combat vessel to be torpedoed by the Germans during WW1. One of his Army brothers perished in a ballooning accident over the English Channel while in uniform.

Photo of British physician Joseph Lister
This epically whiskered gentleman is esteemed British physician Joseph Lister. He and Arthur Martin-Leake practiced medicine around the same time. Lister pioneered the sterile prep of surgical instruments and, in so doing, saved countless lives. Listerine antiseptic and the Lister bag (IYKYK) are named after him. Public domain.

Martin-Leake attended Westminster School and then matriculated at University College Hospital. He graduated with his medical degree at age 19 in 1893. That seems a bit young to me, but medicine was not quite the complicated bucket of snakes back then that it is today.

After graduation, Martin-Leake served at Hemel Hempstead District Hospital. In 1899, the young doctor signed on with the 42d (Hertfordshire) Company, Imperial Yeomanry. The British Empire was at war in South Africa, and Arthur wanted to do his bit.

The Boer War was, in a word, complicated. There were several major phases, but the most compelling was the Second Boer War. This bloody counterinsurgency scrap cost the British Empire more than 100,000 casualties. 22,092 of these were KIA.

On the other side of the balance sheet, 51,555 Boer commandos and sundry auxiliaries were rendered hors de combat. Along the way, 26,370 Boer women and children perished in concentration camps alongside an unknown number of indigenous Africans.

Atrocities were committed by both sides. It was a dark time. There were nonetheless extraordinary examples of individual heroism to be found in both camps.

The Warrior Doc

Dr. Arthur Martin-Leake
Despite being trained as a physician, Arthur Martin-Leake began his military career as a grunt. Public domain.

Martin-Leake spent a year in combat as a trooper with the Imperial Yeomanry. Afterwards, he remained in South Africa as a civilian surgeon before joining the South African Constabulary.

The SAC was a paramilitary organization established in 1900 by the British Army to pacify areas captured from the Transvaal and the Orange Free State during the preceding unpleasantness. Keeping that mob in check was no mean feat.

At age 27, Arthur Martin-Leake was serving with the 5th Field Ambulance in 1902. The Second Boer War raged, and there was blood aplenty spilt on both sides of the line. In such a gory space, competent medical support was critical.

The Fight

Photo of hurt solider in the feild
Arthur Martin-Leake earned his combat accolades by saving lives rather than taking them. Public domain.

On 8 February while his unit was engaged at Vlakfontein, Captain Martin-Leake was called upon to tend to British wounded. King Edward VII later awarded the young Army surgeon the Victoria Cross for his actions that bloody day. This was the narrative:

“During the action at Vlakfontein, on the 8th February, 1902, Surgeon-Captain Martin-Leake went up to a wounded man, and attended to him under a heavy fire from about 40 Boers at 100 yards range. He then went to the assistance of a wounded Officer, and, whilst trying to place him in a comfortable position, was shot three times, but would not give in till he rolled over thoroughly exhausted. All the eight men at this point were wounded, and while they were lying on the Veldt, Surgeon-Captain Martin-Leake refused water till everyone else had been served.”

Now appreciate, this was a big deal. The Victoria Cross is the British equivalent to the American Medal of Honor. Since 1854, the VC has been awarded 1,358 times. 295 of those were posthumous. By contrast, since 1863, the MOH has been awarded 3,555 times.

Suffering from three bullet wounds, Martin-Leake was in quite the bad way. He was eventually evacuated back to Britain due to his injuries. The king presented his award on 2 June 1902.

A Warrior Without a War

Dr. Arthur Martin-Leake
Despite being a card-carrying war hero, Arthur Martin-Leake just couldn’t seem to sit still. Public domain.

Recovering from combat injuries was and is typically an arduous process. Particularly back in the heady days before antibiotic drugs, getting over a trio of bullet wounds took a minute. To keep himself occupied, Dr. Martin-Leake studied up on his surgery texts while he healed. In 1903, he qualified as a Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons.

In addition to a quick mind and an almost lethal dose of patriotic fervor, Arthur Martin-Leake was afflicted with a most deplorable wanderlust. Once he healed sufficiently to travel, the certified war hero signed on as Chief Medical Officer with the Bengal-Nagpur Railway. It seemed Dr. Martin-Leake was now headed to India.

Along the way, he made time to get married. Arthur was the only one of the Martin-Leake children to do so. His wife perished shortly thereafter in India under suspicious circumstances. History seems to have forgotten the details.

Well, That Didn’t Take Long…

In 1912, Dr. Martin-Leake volunteered for the British Red Cross and was attached to the Montenegrin Army during the Balkan Wars. Dr. Martin-Leake subsequently tended to the wounded during the Siege of Scutari. At least this time he didn’t get shot.

The Balkans were the early 20th century version of the Middle East. Those lunatics were forever fighting over something or other. In fact, it was in the Balkans that the world’s next proper dustup conflagrated. In 1914 in Sarajevo, a disaffected anarchist named Gavrilo Princip assassinated Archduke Ferdinand and his wife Sophie. This kicked over an anthill that ultimately morphed into World War 1. Dr. Martin-Leake got in on the ground floor.

A Serious Scrap

Life in the trenches on the Western Front during World War 1 was indescribably ghastly. Public domain.

Everything Martin-Leake had done up until this point was simply preparation for combat on the Western Front during the First World War. Martin-Leake fell in as a Lieutenant with his old unit, the 5th Field Ambulance of the Royal Army Medical Corps. Late in 1914, the 5th Field Ambulance was in action near Zonnebeke, Belgium. History has come to refer to this bloody fight as the First Battle of Ypres.

This was combat on a whole new scale. Unlike previous wars, this forsaken place saw the widespread use of such diabolical stuff as belt-fed machineguns and poison gas. Over 35 bloody days, a quarter of a million men were either killed or seriously wounded. 55,000 of those were British.

Borderline Unbelievable

Amidst the fetid trench warfare that so characterized humanity’s first truly industrialized war, LT Martin-Leake once again willingly placed himself in the thick of the action to rescue wounded Tommies trapped in No-Man’s Land. Miraculously, he was not himself killed. However, he did earn a second Victoria Cross. Here’s the citation:

“Lieutenant Arthur Martin-Leake, Royal Army Medical Corps, who was awarded the Victoria Cross on 13th May, 1902, is granted a Clasp for conspicuous bravery in the present campaign: — For most conspicuous bravery and devotion to duty throughout the campaign, especially during the period 29th October to 8th November, 1914, near Zonnebeke, in rescuing, whilst exposed to constant fire, a large number of the wounded who were lying close to the enemy’s trenches.”

In the annals of the British Empire, only three men have earned the Victoria Cross twice. Nineteen Americans can make a comparable claim with the Medal of Honor. In March of 1915, Martin-Leake was promoted to Major and assumed command of the 46th Field Hospital. He ended the war as a Lieutenant Colonel.

The Rest of the Story

painting of Dr. Arthur Martin-Leake
Dr. Arthur Martin-Leake has been rightly venerated in the United Kingdom. He was a hero of the highest order. Public domain.

When the guns fell silent, LTC Martin-Leake still couldn’t seem to settle down. He returned to India yet again seeking adventure and eventually retired in 1937. In the late 1930’s he purchased and apparently flew a de Havilland Tiger Moth airplane without bothering to obtain any formal training as a pilot. With the onset of World War 2, the aging warrior physician commanded an ARP post. ARP stood for Air Raid Precautions. These civil defenders helped protect British civilians during the Blitz.

LTC Martin-Leake, two-time recipient of Great Britain’s highest award for gallantry in combat, died at home in 1953 at High Cross near Ware. He was attended at his death by his faithful dog Waif. Waif later found a forever home thanks to a formal appeal by the Royal Army Medical Corps.

Martin-Leake’s Victoria Cross with bar is on display at the Army Medical Services Museum in Aldershot, England today. Arthur Martin-Leake was that rare hybrid warrior/healer. His extraordinary exploits were the stuff of legend.

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

USS Franklin D. Roosevelt – The Unluckiest Midway

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Don’t you just hate it when this happens !?!

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns

5th Circuit: Federal Ban on Interstate Handgun Sales Violates 2nd Admendment by AWR Hawkins

A customer checks out a hand gun that is for sale and on display at SP firearms on Thursda
AP Photo/Brittainy Newman

On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the federal ban on interstate handgun sales violates the Second Amendment.

CQ Almanac noted that the ban on interstate handgun sales was put in place via the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. The ban was then fleshed out and expanded in the Gun Control Act of 1968 which was signed into law by Democrat President Lyndon Johnson.

The Fifth Circuit surmised: “The government’s theory of the Ban’s historical justification centers on its contention that ‘when it enacted the Omnibus Crime Control Act and the Gun Control Act of 1968 [which contains all of the provisions comprising the Ban], Congress sought to address concerns about public safety and that individuals deemed dangerous might evade state laws designed to ensure only law-abiding citizens could acquire firearms by purchasing them outside the jurisdiction.’”

But the government’s theory did not survive the Bruen (2022) test.

The Firearms Policy Coalition, a plaintiff in the case, noted that the Fifth Circuit “held that the constitutional right to keep firearms necessarily includes the right to purchase them” and a prohibition against buying a handgun in a state outside one’s state of residence interferes with that right.

The First Circuit ruled, “The Ban sullies the plain text of the Second Amendment and is inconsistent with the nation’s tradition of firearms regulation, dating back to the founding era, under that Amendment.”

 

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Ammo

POTUS Rescinds Lead Ammo Ban

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

A Mid Life Crisis Mobile!

Categories
All About Guns This great Nation & Its People War You have to be kidding, right!?!

The Most Devastating Confrontation in US Navy History – Battle of Savo Island

Categories
This great Nation & Its People You have to be kidding, right!?!

The Truth About Brandon Herrera

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Fieldcraft

Michigan, Indiana and Iowa Are Opening the Door to More Deer Rifles by Scott Witner

Scoped deer hunting rifle with rifle cartridges in a Midwestern hunting setting

For years, deer hunters across parts of the Midwest had to study cartridge case dimensions before heading into the woods. Straight-wall cartridges like the .350 Legend and .450 Bushmaster grew popular in no small part because they gave rifle hunters legal alternatives in states that heavily restricted traditional bottleneck cartridges.

300-grain JHP (Jacketed Hollow Point) 450 Bushmaster

That landscape keeps changing.

Michigan, Indiana, and Iowa now give hunters considerably more flexibility than their old regulations allowed — though the rules, and when they changed, differ in each state.

Michigan Drops the Limited Firearms Deer Zone

Michigan made the biggest change for the 2026 season.

The Michigan Natural Resources Commission eliminated the Limited Firearms Deer Zone in the Lower Peninsula. Beginning September 12, 2026, hunters can use all legal firearms across the Lower Peninsula — including bottleneck-chambered rifles.

Michigan defines a legal rifle during applicable firearm deer seasons as one firing any caliber larger than .22 rimfire.

For hunters who spent years selecting cartridges specifically for the zone, that’s significant. Straight-wall cartridges are still legal; they’re just no longer required simply because you’re hunting the southern Lower Peninsula.

One capacity restriction is worth remembering for AR-platform and other semi-auto hunters: a semi-automatic rifle or shotgun can’t hold more than six shells in the barrel and magazine combined.

(Michigan DNR 2026 deer regulations: https://www.michigan.gov/dnr/managing-resources/laws/regulations/deer)

Indiana Standardizes Rifle Rules

Indiana took a different approach.

The state now permits centerfire rifles firing a bullet at least .219 inch, or 5.56mm, in diameter on both public and private land.

That public-versus-private distinction matters because Indiana previously maintained different rifle-cartridge restrictions depending on where you hunted. Senate Enrolled Act 280, passed in 2025, eliminated that distinction.

The state still prohibits full-metal-jacket bullets for deer and limits hunters to carrying no more than 10 cartridges for each such rifle while hunting deer.

In practical terms, Indiana hunters now follow a much simpler standard: centerfire, .219-inch bullet diameter or larger, with an appropriate hunting projectile. Meet the diameter and it’s a legal rifle — which puts a common AR-15 in 5.56 or .223 on the table, loaded with expanding bullets.

Iowa Is Still Different

Then there’s Iowa.

Iowa allows both straight-wall and necked-down cartridges during its youth/disabled and first and second shotgun seasons — but that doesn’t mean you can grab your .308 or 6.5 Creedmoor and head for the stand.

The cartridge must fire an expanding bullet measuring from .350 through .500 inch and generate at least 500 foot-pounds of muzzle energy.

That makes cartridges such as the .35 Whelen, .350 Legend, .358 Winchester, .450 Bushmaster and .45-70 Government legal options.

300-grain JHC (Jacketed Hollow Cavity) 45-70

It excludes common smaller-diameter bottleneck cartridges — the .308 Winchester, .30-06 Springfield, .270 Winchester and 6.5 Creedmoor — from those seasons. Note the reason: Iowa cares about bullet diameter and energy, not case shape. A bottleneck round that clears .350 (the .35 Whelen, for instance) is fine; a .308 isn’t, because it’s too small.

There’s another important distinction: this isn’t a new Iowa rule for 2026.

The framework allowing these rifles dates to legislation passed in 2020 and administrative rules effective in June 2021. Hunters may be hearing more about expanded Midwestern rifle options this year because of Michigan’s change, but Iowa has operated under its current rules for several seasons.

(Iowa DNR deer hunting page: https://www.iowadnr.gov/things-do/hunting-trapping/types-hunting-trapping/deer-hunting)

Straight-Wall Isn’t Dead

None of this means the Midwest’s straight-wall boom is over.

The .350 Legend, .450 Bushmaster, .45-70 and their kin still make plenty of sense for whitetail, particularly in timber and where shots are short. Plenty of hunters already own rifles chambered for them, know their holds, and shoot ammunition that performs.

The difference is that regulations increasingly give hunters more choice. Michigan effectively removed case geometry from the equation in the Lower Peninsula. Indiana uses a minimum bullet diameter requirement rather than restricting hunters to straight-walled cartridges. Iowa allows necked-down cartridges, but only inside a fairly specific caliber, projectile and energy envelope.

Three Midwestern states, three different sets of rules.

As always, check current state regulations before heading into the field. The fact that your deer rifle is legal on one side of a state line doesn’t mean it’s legal on the other.

Scott Witner

Scott Witner is a former Marine Corps Infantryman with 2nd Battalion, 8th Marines, and served with the 24th MEU(SOC) during a six-month deployment to the Mediterranean. He’s completed specialized training in desert warfare, mountain warfare, and jungle operations across the U.S., South Korea, and Japan.
With over a decade in the firearms and outdoor industry, Scott has helped leading brands grow their visibility and reach through strategic marketing and content development. He currently resides in Northeastern Ohio, where he enjoys hiking, shooting, and testing related gear in the environments it’s intended to be used in.
Categories
All About Guns Anti Civil Rights ideas & "Friends" Grumpy's hall of Shame Gun Fearing Wussies Paint me surprised by this Some Scary thoughts You have to be kidding, right!?!

Highland Park Lawsuit Subpoenas James Reeves, Treats Gun Reviews as ‘Advertising’by Duncan Johnson

Subpoena beside an AR-15-style rifle, notebook and microphone representing litigation reaching into firearms media.
James Reeves says the Highland Park lawsuit against Smith & Wesson has subpoenaed records concerning his firearm reviews and treats unpaid social-media content as advertising. Original illustration by AmmoLand News using OpenAI.

A lawsuit attempting to hold Smith & Wesson responsible for the crimes committed during the 2022 Highland Park parade shooting is now reaching beyond the firearm manufacturer and into the gun media.

Firearms reviewer and attorney James Reeves disclosed on X that he was served with a subpoena demanding years of records and analytics concerning Smith & Wesson and reviews he has produced.

The most troubling part for firearm journalists and content creators is how broadly Reeves says the subpoena defines advertising. According to Reeves, the plaintiffs’ definition includes “even unpaid organic social-media content.”

In other words, an independent review of a lawful firearm could be treated as corporate advertising merely because the reviewer received, tested, or discussed the product.

That is a dangerous theory with implications extending well beyond Smith & Wesson or the firearm industry.

 

Everytown Lawsuit Targets Smith & Wesson Marketing

The subpoena arises from Roberts v. Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., No. 22-LA-00000487, pending in the Circuit Court for Illinois’s 19th Judicial Circuit in Lake County.

The case was filed by Keely and Jason Roberts, individually and on behalf of their twin sons. The family attended the July 4, 2022, parade in Highland Park when murderer Robert Crimo III fired 83 rounds from a rooftop, killing seven people and injuring dozens more.

The Roberts family suffered horrific injuries. According to the complaint, Keely Roberts was shot through the foot, one son was struck by shrapnel, and the other suffered catastrophic injuries that left him unable to walk.

Those facts are tragic. They do not, however, make Smith & Wesson or independent firearm reviewers responsible for the deliberate actions of a murderer.

The 78-page First Amended Complaint—signed by attorneys from Everytown Law and several private firms—names Smith & Wesson, Budsgunshop.com, Red Dot Arms, Crimo, and Crimo’s father as defendants.

The lawsuit advances 11 counts, including alleged violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, deceptive trade practices, negligence, battery, assault, and emotional distress.

Its central theory against Smith & Wesson is that the company unfairly marketed the semiautomatic M&P15 to adolescent and young adult men through military imagery, appeals to excitement and adrenaline, first-person-shooter aesthetics, and social-media influencers.

The complaint repeatedly describes the M&P15 as an “assault rifle” and a “weapon of war.” It alleges that Smith & Wesson’s marketing influenced Crimo’s decision to select the rifle for his attack. That is an allegation, not a finding by the court.

Gun Media Named as Discovery Respondents

The complaint does more than attack Smith & Wesson’s advertising. It separately names Cybear Interactive, Watauga Group, and Clandestine Media Group as “respondents in discovery.” They are not listed as defendants.

The complaint contains only two paragraphs addressing these companies. It alleges that they may possess information “essential” to determining the parties or issues and asks that they answer interrogatories, produce records, and appear for depositions.

Reeves now says the plaintiffs have followed through by serving him with a subpoena seeking years of information concerning Smith & Wesson and his reviews.

AmmoLand reviewed the First Amended Complaint and Reeves’s public statement. The subpoena itself was not included with the documents reviewed, so its precise language and demands are being reported based on Reeves’s account.

According to Reeves, the requested material potentially reaches nearly any YouTube video discussing the M&P15 during the relevant period—even content produced independently and without payment from Smith & Wesson.

“If a manufacturer sends a journalist or creator a product to independently test, that does not magically transform the resulting review into advertising,” Reeves wrote.

That distinction should be obvious. A favorable firearm review does not become an advertisement merely because the manufacturer supplied a sample. Nor does a manufacturer control every conclusion, criticism, or demonstration published by an independent reviewer.

Treating journalism as advertising could allow plaintiffs to drag reporters and creators into litigation simply for covering firearms someone later misused.

Lawsuit Seeks Restrictions on Smith & Wesson Speech

The plaintiffs are seeking monetary damages, but they also want the Illinois court to impose sweeping restrictions on Smith & Wesson’s marketing.

The requested injunction would prohibit Smith & Wesson from targeting AR-15-style rifle marketing at children and young adults and from using military branding, imagery, or references. It would also require age gates on social media, warnings in advertisements, and disclosure whenever an advertisement features actors.

The complaint relies heavily on the claim that Smith & Wesson created a misleading association between its M&P rifles and the United States military. It further alleges that marketing rifles with military themes encourages civilians to engage in unlawful military, militia, or paramilitary activity.

The argument effectively treats ordinary images of lawful rifle use, tactical training, or military heritage as evidence of wrongdoing. Now, based on Reeves’s description of the subpoena, plaintiffs appear prepared to apply that same theory to independent firearm coverage.

Another Attempt to Plead Around the PLCAA

Reeves characterizes the case as another attempt to circumvent the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

Congress enacted the PLCAA to prevent firearm manufacturers and sellers from being held civilly liable for harm caused by criminals who misuse lawful products. The law contains specific exceptions, including cases involving defective products, negligent entrustment, and knowing violations of laws governing firearm sales or marketing.

Gun-control organizations have increasingly attempted to fit their cases within those exceptions by framing traditional product advertising as consumer fraud or unlawful marketing.

Reeves compared the Roberts case to the litigation brought against Remington following the Sandy Hook murders. He also connected the subpoena to his work on proposed state legislation intended to clarify and reinforce protections against lawsuits based on third-party criminal misuse.

Regardless of how the Illinois court ultimately rules, the effort to classify independent reviews as advertising should concern every journalist and content creator.

The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms. The First Amendment protects the right to speak, publish, and report about them. Anti-gun litigants should not be permitted to evade one constitutional protection by attacking the other.

Reeves advised firearm-media professionals who receive similar subpoenas not to ignore them—and not to delete records. That is sound advice. A subpoena is a legal demand requiring a serious and timely response.

It is also a warning that the gun-control lobby’s campaign against the firearm industry is expanding. The target is no longer limited to manufacturers and dealers. The people who review, explain, and report on lawful firearms are now being pulled into the fight.

=============================================       For the Record my Blog “You will shoot your eye out.com has gotten ONE Penny from the Public or the Gun Industry. This is just a hobby of mine and should be protected by the 1st Amendment of the US Federal Constitution.

Also it should be noted that I am dirt poor! So to all the blood thirsty lawyers out there. I kind of doubt that you would make much money off of me! Grumpy