Categories
A Victory! Allies War

New details uncovered of British girl’s kidnap and rescue in 1920s Raj by Mark Bridge

Previously unseen papers have revealed new details of the extraordinary rescue mission that followed the kidnapping of a British teenage girl on the North-West Frontier 100 years ago.

The abduction of Mollie Ellis and the dramatic response inspired breathless news coverage in the 1920s but were quickly overshadowed by a royal wedding. According to a study drawing on private letters of a British official, the episode isn’t only a compelling tale of terror and derring-do, but also reveals the “bankruptcy” of colonial policy.

The events unfolded in the historically contested region where northern outposts of the British Raj ran up against quasi-independent tribal territories on the border with Afghanistan.

A 1967 illustration by CL Doughty depicting Mollie Ellis and Lilian Starr, “the heroine of Peshawar”. Image: ©Look and Learn

In the early hours of April 14, 1923, five men from these tribal lands attacked the bungalow of Major Archibald Ellis in the cantonment of Kohat. With the major away, they murdered his wife Ellen and abducted the couple’s 17-year-old daughter, Mollie, whose cries for help were drowned out by a violent storm. The party fled to the hills and sheltered in caves and ravines as they made their way to the tribal area of the Tirah.

New insights into what happened next have been shared by historian Dr Jayne Gifford after she was given access to the papers of Sir John Maffey, Chief Commissioner of the North-West Frontier Province and the leading British administrator on the spot.

Learning of the attack at Kohat, 45-year-old Maffey wrote to his wife Dorothy: “This Kohat affair has lurched me sideways… Nothing can make such a sordid affair anything but a bad show.”

The motive of the attackers, led by one Ajab Khan Afridi, was believed to have been revenge after a police raid seized rifles linking Ajab and his brother Shahzada to the murders of a Colonel and Mrs Foulkes. The men tried to conceal the guns by disguising themselves as women but Frontier Constabulary entered the women’s quarters and foiled the scheme. The brothers were reportedly taunted by the women of their clan for allowing this insult to their sex.

Several days after her abduction, Mollie was permitted to write to Lieutenant-Colonel CE Bruce, district commissioner at Kohat, saying she was “alive and fairly well, but very weak from living on bread and potatoes”. Mollie, who was unaware of her mother’s death, wrote: “I am in a village N.W. of the Samana. My captors tell me that the D.C. [district commissioner] at Peshawar has offered a ransom for me. Is it true? If so, they are after it. They also want three or four men you took in connection with those rifles the other day. What can you do for me?”

She urged Bruce to comply with the men’s terms and to send her warm clothes, including a coat and breeches — “A skirt is no use to me, the way I shall have to travel.” The next day she wrote: “They are frightening me more than ever and I am afraid I shall never get out of this. I can’t quite make out what they say, so I may be imagining worse than it is.”

Portrait of John Maffey in 1923, the year of Miss Ellis’s abduction, by Philip Alexius de László. Image: Alamy

Maffey believed a conventional military operation in tribal territory would be unsuccessful and might endanger Mollie. For now, he didn’t even know her precise location.

As Gifford, lecturer in modern history at the University of East Anglia, explains, Maffey formulated a three-part plan that relied on close cooperation with the tribes. First, Zaman Khan, a tribal leader, was despatched from Peshawar to raise a lashkar, or war party, from the clans of the Afridi — the Pashtun tribe to which Ajab Khan and Shahzada belonged. His role was to put pressure on the tribesmen to stop Mollie’s abductors moving her further towards Afghanistan and, if necessary, “to cut them off and to capture her by force”.

Next, Khan Bahadur Kuli Khan, another Pashtun who was political assistant at Kurram, secured an audience with the influential Mullah Mahmud Akkundzake, who confirmed rumours that Mollie was being held by Ajab Khan in the cleric’s home village of Khanki Bazaar.

Finally, Maffey approached Lilian Starr, a missionary sister in Peshawar, and asked if she would join a rescue party. He believed the inclusion of a woman would have a “very real political effect” in the projection of imperial power. Starr, whose husband Dr Vernon Starr had been stabbed to death by Pashtun assassins in March 1918, told Maffey she was “only too glad” to be of use.

As the Newcastle Sunday Sun would put it days later: “Perhaps it was because of her bereavement that she deemed life a little thing, and was willing, as she now signified, to take her life in her hands and seek out the missing girl in the heart of the disaffected area… It seemed a veritable lion’s den into which she was putting her head.”

The party, consisting of Mrs Starr, Maffey’s assistant Rissaldar Mogal Baz Khan and members of the Orakzai tribe, set off on April 20 and reached Khanki Bazaar the next day. In the meantime, at the urging of Kuli Khan, the mullah had persuaded Ajab Khan to hand over Mollie to his own protection, pending negotiations.

Talks between the abductors and the British representatives took place at the mullah’s house while Mrs Starr cared for Mollie. During the discussions, Ajab Khan and Shahzada learned that the Afridi lashkar raised by the British had arrived in the brothers’ village and was attacking their homes.

Furious, Shahzada threatened the safety of Mrs Starr and Mollie. As Gifford writes in her paper in the Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History: “This action proved to be the turning point. The Mullah Mahmud was enraged at the insult to the sanctity of his roof and publicly cursed Shahzada and his companions. The balance had shifted. The demands for ransom and the concessions of a pardon were abandoned and the surrender of Mollie Ellis was swiftly arranged in exchange for the release of two men … held in Kohat jail for theft.”

The rescue party set out on their return journey on April 23 and were greeted by Maffey, Major Ellis and local officers at Shinawari Fort. Writing to his wife, Maffey said: “It is always hateful to the independent tribes when we stick our finger into their midst. The despatch of a woman was a bit of ju jitsu which has thrown them out of their bearings. It establishes our prestige and gives them a chance of regaining some of theirs. ‘You have shown how damned badly you can behave to a woman. Here’s another! See if you can do any better’.”

A young patient of Lilian Starr’s in a photograph from her 1920 book Frontier folk of the Afghan border — and beyond. Image: public domain, via United States Library of Congress

He described “the dainty English nurse, sitting at night in the house of the notorious Mulla[h] Mahmud with a pencil in her hand writing down in English what the Rissaldar is saying and round them the three bloodthirsty ruffians who murdered Mrs Ellis, haggling for terms. (This ought to be done for the Royal Academy!)”.

As for Mollie, he wrote: “[She] is not attractive to look at, tiny, pale, peaky, with huge black eyes, but lots of character. A marvellous escape!”

The rescue was fêted in the newspapers, although Maffey complained that, in their hassling of the various protagonists for comment, “the Press has been a perfect arse to us all”. Referring to the wedding of the future King George VI and Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon on April 26, he said: “Thank God there’s a Royal Wedding to attract attention now.”

Mrs Starr, Kuli Khan and Mogal Baz Khan were all subsequently awarded the Kaiser-i-Hind gold medal by the viceroy on behalf of George V.

Yet for all the congratulations, the attack and its aftermath had exposed the fragility of the British presence. With the perpetrators still at large and Afghanistan suspected of having, at the least, encouraged their actions, Maffey was expected to act decisively to restore British authority.

On May 11, he travelled to Kohat to convene a tribal council, or jirga, the following day. Four days previously he had arranged for 15 warplanes to fly over the tribal lands “as a gentle demonstration (no bombing yet) and to help produce the right atmosphere for the jirga“.

After the jirga, Maffey wrote to Dorothy that the results were “excellent”, even if attributable more to the aerial threat than his own eloquence. The tribal representatives declared Ajab Khan’s band their enemies. They said the kidnappers and their families would not be permitted to enter their territories and it would be the tribes’ duty to hand them over if they tried it.

They also agreed that the British could take action, by aeroplane or otherwise, if shelter was nevertheless provided by any individual or group. Maffey observed: “Under severe strain and much humiliation the tribal organisation has been made to work for us.”

Yet, presciently, he added: “But because I am satisfied, it doesn’t follow that other people will be”.

Indeed, while the Government of India was broadly happy with the outcome, questions were raised over Maffey’s methods. As one official put it: “The aerial demonstrations over Tirah is repeatedly stated to have had an excellent ‘lowering’ effect: but it is almost equally constantly stated to have been very deeply resented.”

In spite of the viceroy’s praise for Maffey’s “success” in the case, during the autumn of 1923 the colonial government was considering him “for some other post than that of Chief Commissioner of the North-West Province”.

Following the jirga, tribal search parties set out to find the perpetrators but it was established that they had fled to Afghanistan. It was only after months of diplomatic pressure that Ajab Khan and two other Kohat fugitives were arrested in January 1924 and exiled to Afghan Turkestan. The remaining two fugitives returned to the Tirah where they lived freely.

As Gifford writes: “The harbouring of these men was in direct contravention of the agreement reached on May 12 but the majority of Afridi opinion was in favour of allowing them to remain. The work of Maffey was ultimately null and void whilst the cat and mouse game between Britain and the tribes on the frontier continued. On the day that Maffey’s Indian Civil Service pension was due, he resigned from the service and left the North-West Frontier in 1924.”

She said Mollie’s rescue and its aftermath demonstrated Britain’s ability to project power across the frontier in the short term by utilising the tribal system and military coercion. “Longer-term consequences demonstrate the bankruptcy of British rule. That, despite the superior military technology, the construction of more secure cantonments and the capture of several of the perpetrators of the abduction, Britain could not secure its uncontested influence: two of the perpetrators returned to live in the Tirah country and the raiding of the settled districts resumed.”

DRC1XE Afghanistan – Kohat Pass – N. W. Frontier Province

She added that the case highlighted longstanding tensions between administrators and soldiers on the frontier, the Government of India and officials in London. In a memorandum of 1922, Maffey had argued that involvement in the tribal territories was a mistake. In his view, it did not strengthen Britain’s position when confronted with the risk of Soviet encroachment in Afghanistan, but rather “trammelled” it.

Gifford said: “Outwardly the rescue was touted as a success. Internally the whole episode really showed up the friction between the men on the spot like Maffey vis-à-vis London. London was pushing a harder line whereas Maffey was effectively saying, ‘No, we need to withdraw from these areas — it’s just making our lives a lot harder’.”

In his letters to his wife, Maffey referred to the Foreign Department of the Government of India as “most unhelpful and full of ignorant criticisms”. He dismissed Sir Francis Humphreys, the British Minister in Kabul, as “that namby pamby Humphreys”.

On a broader level, Gifford said: “The Mollie Ellis abduction is a good case study lens to look into the nature of British rule and people like Maffey, who wasn’t a big political figure. He was a mid-level imperial administrator. But the more you look into his story, the more you see the big network he built up of military and civilian contacts in his different postings. So there’s a bigger picture of imperial networks and how it was all about who you knew and what favours you could call in.”

After leaving India, Maffey had a distinguished diplomatic career and was raised to the peerage as Baron Rugby. He was the grandfather of the politician Jonathan Aitken who gave Gifford access to Maffey’s papers.

At Partition in 1947, the North-West Frontier became part of Pakistan. Ajab Khan Afridi has been celebrated as a hero and freedom fighter there and is the subject of several action films.

Mollie Ellis and her father travelled to England shortly after her rescue. She went on to marry Major Eric Wade at All Souls’ Church, Langham Place, London, in 1930. She returned to Kohat in 1983 to visit her mother’s grave.

The top picture shows the mountainous landscape around Kohat in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province as it appears today. Photo: Shutterstock

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

Strangest Armoured Car of WW2

Categories
All About Guns Born again Cynic! Paint me surprised by this Soldiering that’s too bad” The Green Machine This great Nation & Its People You have to be kidding, right!?!

The 24th, Buffalo Soldiers, and the Houston Mutiny of 1917 | Based on a True Story

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

Hand Engraved Colt Combat Commander by TJHarris

Categories
All About Guns You have to be kidding, right!?!

Can You Shoot a Grenade Out of the Air? | MythBusters | Discovery

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

UPDATE! Nationwide Block of Suppressor & SBR Tax Passed! NFA Block Now Pushed With Court Help!

Categories
This great Nation & Its People War You have to be kidding, right!?!

The US Literally Forgot How to Build Navy Ships

Categories
Cops You have to be kidding, right!?!

New pro-gun group challenging extreme gun control of U.S. Virgin Islands The USVI has one of the highest crime rates in the world. by Lee Williams

Crown Bay Marina, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands. (Photo courtesy Crown Bay Marina)

by Lee Williams

The United States Virgin Islands are beautiful, peaceful and serene as long as visitors don’t stray too far from the well-patrolled tourist areas. For Virgin Islands residents, as well as any visitors who may wander out of the safe zones, the USVI can be a death sentence.

The USVI has one of the highest crime rates in the world, per capita more than New York or even Washington D.C.

All major crime in the U.S. Territory is run by the “Commission,” hardcore but well-organized gangsters who are headquartered on St. Croix, the largest of the three islands.

The Commission is responsible for operating a massive international drug trade, which are delivered from across the Caribbean. It’s not unusual to hear planes landing at night without lights.

Virgin Islands criminals are smart, sophisticated and well-armed with handguns, shotguns and machineguns. For the most part, they only prey on other criminals, but this can change in an instant.

The Virgin Islands Police Department offers little resistance to the armed gangs who actually run the territory. The VIPD is severely undermanned, underpaid and undertrained. The department is horribly led.

Many VIPD officers are corrupt. If they’re told to stay away from an area because a shipment is inbound, they do what they’re told, or they can disappear without a trace.

Gun control in the USVI is the worst in the country, and as a result only the bad guys have guns. Civilians have no legal way to protect themselves, their family or their home.

In December 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against the VI Government, the VI Police Department and the Police Commissioner, alleging that they “have continued to obstruct and systematically deny law-abiding American citizens this fundamental right by systematically delaying the processing of applications and imposing unconstitutional conditions on the exercise of this constitutional right.”

“The conduct by the USVI, the VIPD, and Defendant Brooks has rendered the constitutional right to keep and bear arms a virtual nullity within the United States Virgin Islands territory,” the lawsuit states.

While this may appear to be a good step forward, many VI residents see little likelihood that the lawsuit will be quick, and even less likelihood that it will force any significant change.

A unique idea

Kosei Ohno owns the Crown Bay Marina, which is located on St. Thomas. The marina has 100 slips, including many that can take mega-yachts of 200-feet or greater, and it’s only five minutes from the airport.

Kosei Ohno

Ohno, who also spends time in Washington State, recently filed suit against the Virgin Islands Police Commissioner and the VI government after they denied his attempt to renew his firearm licenses, which he had for several years.

Legally owning firearms in the USVI is incredibly invasive and expensive. Gun owners must pay a tax of $150 per firearm every three years. If you legally own 10 guns, you’re going to pay $1,500 every three years. You must also allow a VI Police Officer access to your safe, and they photograph the contents. Getting the actual license can take 18 months or even longer.

“The officer comes into your home without a warrant, demands to see your safe, demands you open the safe and then takes pictures,” Ohno told me this week. “Some people have guns, jewelry and gold bars as well as cash, and you wonder how it gets stolen. The whole process creates a vulnerability and a list of people, many of whom have lost guns through burglaries and theft.”

Ohno soon learned he was not alone.

“I found out through a source of mine at the VIPD that they made it their new mission to deny everyone’s permits,” he said.

So far, Ohno said, he has spent more than $70,000 to get his permits back, so he decided to act. He created the Virgin Islands Safe Gun Owners, a private group of more than 250 residents who all believed it was time to get organized. Their mission is to “restore and promote Second Amendment Rights in the Territory while promoting safe gun ownership.”

“There was considerable abuse happening,” Ohno said. “Our members include many retired officer, feds, military and business owners. It’s a pretty diverse and expansive group. We were able to give the feds evidence, which allowed them to get involved in the Second Amendment litigation against the police department. I learned it’s not just me whose rights were violated.”

The group introduced legislation that they say will modernize firearms ownership throughout the territory.

Ohno said his lawsuit, which he filed in federal not territorial court, has “expansive potential.” But getting arrested for a firearm that’s not registered, he said, would be disastrous.

“According to Virgin Islands law, if you’re caught with an unregistered firearm, the mandatory sentence is 10 to life,” he said.

Ohno has just launched a GoFundMe page and is considering other legal options.

Said Ohno: “Bravery is contagious. Fear is just as contagious, but transition is always risky.”

Categories
A Victory! All About Guns Our Great Kids Paint me surprised by this

Forging the Future Aluminum’s Journey from Rarity to Ubiquity By Will Dabbs, MD

The AR-15 rifle is the most popular long gun in America. It is built around upper and lower receivers cut from aircraft-grade aluminum.

Aluminum is a ubiquitous material in modern society. Back in 1956 when Gene Stoner and a few others designed that first AR-15 rifle around aluminum receivers, they literally changed the landscape. In the 1980s, everybody in the combat handgun world was churning out high-capacity, aluminum-framed pistols. Nowadays, we discard or recycle aluminum beverage cans by the zillions.

One of the neat things about aluminum is the way it sort of heals itself. Pure aluminum is highly reactive when exposed to air. However, the resulting aluminum oxide is exceptionally stable. This results in a natural microscopic protective coating on exposed surfaces. In applications like window frames, mechanical trauma from repetitive use results in tiny scratches that instantly oxidize, ensuring a robust material that resists environmental degradation.

Aluminum is relatively soft and easy to both extrude and machine. There are dozens of recognized aluminum alloys. Most AR parts are formed from 6061, which includes trace amounts of silicon, magnesium, copper and chromium. The 7075 alloy includes zinc in place of the silicon.

The 1980s was the decade of the “Wonder Nines.” These high-capacity 9mm pistols were built around aluminum frames.

Digging Deeper

 

Aluminum is indeed fascinating stuff. It has an atomic number of 13 and is roughly one-third of the density of steel. Aluminum is the 12th most common element in the universe and the third-most common element in the Earth’s crust right behind silicon and oxygen. It accounts for 1.59% of the Earth’s mass. The stuff is everywhere.

Despite the fact that aluminum was so common in nature, back in the late 1800s it was actually considered a precious metal. Gram for gram, aluminum once cost more than both gold and silver. Napoleon III reserved his aluminum flatware to impress visiting dignitaries. Lesser visitors got the silver.

In 1884, the Washington Monument was capped with a six-pound piece of aluminum. The total national output of aluminum that same year in the United States was only 112 pounds. Aluminum was revered similarly to platinum. How was it that such an abundant material might have been considered so rare and valuable a short century or so ago? That all depends on how you refine it.

While there are scads of elemental aluminum in the earth’s crust, prior to the late 1800s, it was terribly difficult to access. Most elemental aluminum is found in the form of a natural ore called bauxite. By 19th-century standards, extracting usable aluminum from this ore was nigh impossible.

Nowadays, lots of guns are built out of aluminum. This custom
takedown AR short-barreled rifle and this FN SCAR-15P carbine
are counted among them.

Find a Need and Fill It

In 1886, a 17-year-old college student named Charles Hall was sitting in a chemistry class when his professor told him about the aluminum quandary. Hall’s professor actually said that if someone could devise a cost-effective method for extracting aluminum from bauxite, he would become the richest man in the world. Intrigued, the teenager went home determined to find a better way.

For the next five years, Charles Hall toiled in a workshop he had erected inside his family’s woodshed. Eventually, his perseverance paid off and he discovered a unique process that would produce aluminum from bauxite using electricity. At age 22, Charles Hall was indeed about to change the world.

Bizarrely, at exactly the same time in France, another 22-year-old, this one named Paul Heroult, discovered the identical technique. The resulting electrolytic extraction of aluminum from bauxite has become known as the Hall-Heroult Process.

AR-15 receivers are lightweight, ubiquitous and strong.

Changing the World

Because both men discovered the process at the same time, neither established a monopoly. However, there was more than enough sweetness to go around. The young Charles Hall founded Alcoa, short for Aluminum Company of America. In 2023, Alcoa’s total revenue was $10.55 billion.

Extracting usable aluminum is still a terribly energy-dependent undertaking. As a result, most aluminum smelters are located in places where electric power is cheap. Production of one kilo of aluminum requires the equivalent of seven kilos of oil energy. That compares to 1.5 kilos for steel and 2 kilos for plastic. Today, 5% of the electric power produced in the United States goes toward smelting aluminum.

Ruminations

I am pretty quick to denigrate young people. With the exception of my own kids, I just don’t find the youth of today terribly impressive. In fact, I’m not sure I’d trust your typical Information Age 17-year-old unsupervised with electrical tape, much less a homebuilt metal smelting workshop. However, when Charles Hall was seventeen, he took up the challenge to find a better way to extract aluminum from rocks. In so doing, he did become lyrically wealthy.

Had Charles Hall been born a century later, he would not have been able to buy a beer or own a gun when he first embarked upon his holy quest to conjure aluminum from the ground. However, through hard work, perseverance and no small amount of talent, this driven young man did, indeed, change the world. So, the next time you drag your favorite AR-15 out to the range, just appreciate that some teenager figured out how to extract the stuff they used to make it.

 

Categories
You have to be kidding, right!?!

How the Rich & The Shameless live